Group 11
Group 11
Group 11
Plagiarism
Submitted by
(Group 11)
Academic misconduct is a growing concern all over the world today. One of the most highly
employed methods of such misconduct is plagiarism, which has now become a very
controversial issue in academic circles. Plagiarism is an act of misappropriation of others'
intellectual property, including but not limited to scholarly texts, research methods, graphics, and
ideas (Gasparyan et al, 2017). The University of Oxford defines plagiarism as follows-
“Presenting work or ideas from another source as your own, with or without consent of the
original author”. Simply put, plagiarism is an academic act of misconduct that occurs when a
student or researcher intentionally takes credit for someone else's ideas, words, or other original
material without giving credit to the source. The origin of the term "plagiarism," meaning literary
theft, traces back to the Latin words plagiārius, meaning "kidnapper" and plaga meaning
"hunting net".
Although such a phenomenon is not new, plagiarism has become easy and widespread with the
worldwide development of the internet and easy and spontaneous access to it, (Ashworth et al.,
1997; Park, 2004; Roberts, 2008). The ability to easily copy and paste large sections of text,
manipulate ideas, and paraphrase without acknowledgement has made plagiarism easier to
commit in institutional settings and harder to detect. According to Sikes (2009), it has perhaps
become the most common type of authorial offence, threatening the integrity of universities and
their academic standards. Although the internet is to be blamed for the lion’s share of plagiarism,
it is also important to note that there are other contributing factors to it as well.
Given the current landscape and the growing prevalence of plagiarism, it is essential to recognise
how the issue poses a significant threat to not only students but to the integrity of academic
institutions as well. The consequences of plagiarism extend beyond individual punishment; it
undermines the value of academic work and damages the credibility of educational systems.
With advancements in technology and the ease of access to online resources, opportunities for
plagiarism have increased, making it more difficult for educators and institutions to detect and
control. As a result, many universities and academic/research institutions have implemented
strict policies, detection tools, and educational programs aimed at preventing plagiarism. There is
also a growing recognition that at the core of this all, however, is the need to instill students and
academics with ethical writing practices.
However, despite these efforts providing some relief to preserve the originality of work, the
challenges remain, and there is a need for ongoing discourse around the responsibility of both
students and faculty in fostering an environment of academic honesty. This has sparked
conversations across the world on how to best address academic misconduct and maintain high
ethical standards in research and scholarship.
There has been a growing scholarship on plagiarism lately that has explored various facets of the
phenomenon including its causes, the growing role of technology and possible strategies to
overcome it. Not only that, studies have identified various reasons behind plagiarism such as a
lack of understanding of proper citation practices, cultural differences in academic writing
norms, and pressure to meet academic or publication requirements etc (Park, 2004). Researchers
like Sikes (2009) have examined how plagiarism is perceived differently across cultures, with
some arguing that certain societies place less emphasis on individual ownership of intellectual
property. This cultural diversity necessitates a more flexible and inclusive approach to
understanding and preventing plagiarism. Simply applying a one-size-fits-all, punitive model
across diverse contexts won’t be useful.
Given the complexity of the phenomenon, our paper will explore the multifaceted nature of
plagiarism, examining the role of technology in its proliferation and prevention, and the
measures that can be taken to combat it effectively. It emphasizes the need for a more holistic
understanding of plagiarism that emphasises not only on culture but also individuals. In doing so,
it will also reflect on the ethical implications of plagiarism in academia and propose solutions
that could help safeguard the future of scholarly integrity. By engaging with the existing body of
scholarship, this paper will contribute to the ongoing discussion on how best to safeguard the
integrity of academic research in an increasingly interconnected and digitalized world.
The first section of this paper emphasises the importance of instilling ethical writing practices
among academics and students. The next section explores the various strategies for preventing
plagiarism, going into both technology-driven solutions and individual strategies. By integrating
these approaches, the paper highlights how both technological tools and individual responsibility
is essential to effectively curb plagiarism. Ultimately, the discussion section calls for a holistic
approach, addressing not only the causes of plagiarism but also the all round strategies needed
for its prevention.
At its very core, plagiarism can be avoided in institutional settings if students and researchers
are instilled with ethical writing practices from the beginning of their academic career. At its
core, ethical writing revolve around honesty, fairness, transparency, and respect for
intellectual property. By adhering to ethical principles in academic writing, researchers uphold
the values of the academic community and ensure the reliability and validity of their work. In
ethical writing, plagiarism is perhaps the most serious and the most widely recognized ethical
lapse. It can occur in many forms and some of the more subtle instances, while arguably
unethical in nature. The importance of ethical writing, then, is based not only upon the
avoidance of plagiarism, but also avoiding the weaknesses of bias and exclusive language,
which strengthens the credibility and persuasiveness of the writer’s perspectives.
It is extremely important for researchers, students and scientific writers to understand the
importance of academic integrity as they get in their work on to public domain. Academic
integrity is about who you are as a person, and how you act when it matters. Academic
integrity means acting in a way that is honest, fair, respectful and responsible in studies,
research and ethical writing. It means applying these values in our own work, and also when
we engage with the work and contributions of others.
A general principle underlying ethical writing is the notion that the written work of an author,
be it a manuscript for a magazine or scientific journal, a research paper submitted for a
course, or a grant proposal submitted to a funding agency, represents an implicit contract
between the author of that work and his/her readers. Accordingly, the reader assumes that the
author is the sole originator of the written work and that any material, text, data, or ideas
borrowed from others is clearly identified as such by established scholarly conventions, such
as footnotes, block-indented text, and quotations marks. The reader also assumes that all
information conveyed therein is accurately represented to the best of the author’s abilities. In
summary “Ethical writing is being clear, accurate, fair, and honest” and its promotion conveys
to readers a commitment to ethical practice in other aspects of the author’s work.
From an academic perspective it is important that the researchers, students and related stake
holders get a handle around the dos and don’ts of ethical writing and prevention of plagiarism,
avoid intentional and unintentional breaches of the ethical writing / plagiarism practices,
understand the repercussions of failure of ethical writing practices and last but not the least
propagate the essence of Confidentiality, Availability and Integrity (CIA) coupled with team
spirit and team work. Citations and referencing is a repaying a debt of gratitude to the world
of ethical writing. These practices ensure that academic work remains credible, trustworthy,
and a true reflection of intellectual integrity.
Plagiarism detection tools like Turnitin and Grammarly are widely used to identify instances of
copied or poorly paraphrased content. While originally designed as detection tools, their role has
expanded into learning aids. These tools help students develop proper writing habits by
highlighting improper citations, unintentional plagiarism, and other writing issues. Here's how
they function as educational tools:
● Turnitin: This platform checks submitted documents against a vast database of published
works, web pages, and other student submissions. It provides students with originality
reports, helping them understand where they might have plagiarized. Turnitin also offers
detailed feedback on grammar, writing style, and the proper use of citations.
● Grammarly: Initially designed as a grammar checker, Grammarly has evolved into a
more comprehensive tool that also checks for plagiarism. It provides real-time
suggestions on sentence structure, punctuation, and vocabulary, making it a valuable asset
for students aiming to improve their writing. The plagiarism detection feature helps
students recognize instances where they may have copied text inadvertently.
By using these tools, students become more aware of academic honesty principles and are able to
develop the skill of correctly paraphrasing, quoting, and citing sources.
b. Teaching Students How to Use Citation Management Software (e.g., Zotero, EndNote)
One of the most common reasons for accidental plagiarism is improper citation. Citation
management tools like Zotero and EndNote simplify the process of collecting, organizing, and
formatting references, making it easier for students to adhere to academic citation standards.
Teaching students how to use these tools reduces the cognitive load associated with citation
management, enabling them to focus on developing original content and properly attributing
sources.
Learning Management Systems (LMS) such as Blackboard, Moodle, and Canvas provide a
centralized platform where students can access course materials, submit assignments, and engage
with their instructors and peers. LMS platforms play a significant role in promoting academic
integrity in several ways:
● Guidance and Resources: LMS platforms often include built-in tools and resources
related to academic integrity. For instance, many LMS platforms have direct integrations
with plagiarism detection tools like Turnitin. This allows students to check their work for
originality before final submission.
● Assignment Submission and Feedback: Through LMS, instructors can set clear
expectations for assignments and provide feedback on students' adherence to academic
standards. Submission of work through the LMS enables automatic checks for plagiarism
and facilitates secure, time-stamped submissions, reducing opportunities for academic
dishonesty.
● Collaborative Tools: Many LMS platforms have built-in forums, peer review systems,
and group work features. These tools encourage academic collaboration, allowing
students to work together while staying within the boundaries of integrity guidelines.
● Real-Time Monitoring: LMS platforms allow instructors to monitor student activity,
providing insight into how students engage with course materials. This monitoring can be
used to detect irregularities or suspicious behaviors, such as disproportionate access to
specific resources, which may indicate potential academic misconduct.
Through the proper use of LMS platforms, institutions can foster a culture of academic integrity,
guiding students toward ethical behavior in their academic pursuits.
Along with technological solutions to prevent plagiarism, individual-level strategies are equally
crucial in preventing plagiarism because they focus on building personal responsibility, ethical
awareness, and academic integrity. It is only through instilling such practices in students and
researchers, one can anticipate that they will stay away from dishonest practices. Some such
strategies as using proper citation, paraphrasing, and critical thinking, students and researchers
become more conscious of the value of original work and intellectual honesty. Not only do these
practices reduce the likelihood of unintentional plagiarism, but it also foster a culture of respect
for intellectual property. Ultimately, empowering individuals with the skills and ethical mindset
right from the beginning of their careers, to avoid plagiarism is essential for maintaining the
credibility and integrity of academic scholarship. Below we explore some individual-level
strategies to check plagiarism-
In this paper, we have delved into how ethical writing practice is the foundation to stop dishonest
practices in writing while modern technology offers effective strategies to prevent plagiarism.
However, implementing these measures may often present significant challenges in educational
settings as well. Many students enter higher education with ingrained academic habits that can be
resistant to change, making it difficult for educators to instill new approaches to research and
writing. Furthermore, the introduction of plagiarism detection tools often faces student pushback,
as these technologies may be perceived as punitive rather than supportive. Additionally, finding
the right balance between promoting academic freedom and enforcing plagiarism policies poses
a complex dilemma for institutions. This section explores these challenges, emphasizing the need
for ongoing dialogue, patience, and carefully crafted educational frameworks to foster a culture
of academic integrity.
● The challenge of altering established academic habits: Many students enter higher
education with entrenched behaviors regarding how they approach research and writing.
Changing these habits can be a daunting task, as they may be resistant to new methods or
unsure of how to adapt their skills. Educators must employ patience and provide
consistent support to help students navigate this transition, which may involve ongoing
training and encouragement to adopt new practices.
● Student pushback against plagiarism detection technologies: While plagiarism
detection tools are designed to uphold academic integrity, some students may view them
as intrusive or overly punitive. This resistance can stem from a lack of understanding of
the importance of original work or fear of being unfairly penalized. Educators can
address this challenge by providing clear explanations of how these tools function and
emphasizing their role in fostering a fair academic environment.
● Finding the right balance between academic autonomy and stringent plagiarism
regulations: Striking a balance between maintaining academic freedom and enforcing
plagiarism policies can be complex. Students should feel empowered to express their
ideas while also understanding the importance of attribution and originality. Institutions
need to create a supportive framework that encourages creativity and exploration,
alongside clear guidelines about acceptable practices and the consequences of violations.
Open dialogues about these issues can help foster a culture of integrity within the
academic community.
At the individual level, encouraging ethical writing practices is fundamental in academia. The
attention to personal accountability and the cultivation of integrity within students and
researchers forms the foundation of plagiarism prevention. It is the responsibility of educators to
guide students through the nuances of academic writing, helping them understand that original
thought and proper citation are essential to their intellectual growth. However, the shift from
already established academic habits to ethical writing practices in students is a complex and
gradual process, one that is often met with resistance from students. This challenge underlines
the need for consistent education and support, as well as a shift in the institutional culture to one
that prioritizes integrity over expediency.
On the technological front, tools such as plagiarism detection software and citation management
systems have become indispensable in the fight against academic dishonesty. These technologies
not only deter plagiarism by identifying copied content but also serve as educational aids,
helping students develop proper research and citation skills. However, the implementation of
these tools is not without challenges, as students may perceive them as punitive rather than
supportive. This calls for a more thoughtful integration of technology into the educational
process, ensuring that students understand the value of these tools in fostering fairness and
originality in academic work.
In conclusion, our paper put forward the idea that despite the promising role of technology and
education, the intricacies of plagiarism cannot be fully addressed by either approach in isolation.
A holistic and multifaceted understanding of plagiarism is necessary, one that considers multiple
factors- cultural differences in attitudes toward intellectual property, pressures in academia, and
the evolving nature of information sharing in the digital era. Academic institutions must strive to
strike a balance between encouraging originality and enforcing plagiarism policies, creating an
atmosphere where students feel motivated to explore ideas while also understanding the
importance of honest practices.
References
Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., Thorne, P., & Students on the Qualitative Research Methods
Course Unit. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and
plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in higher education, 22(2), 187-203.
Barrett, R., & Malcolm, J. (2006). Embedding plagiarism education in the assessment
process. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2(1).
https://doi.org/10.21913/ijei.v2i1.23
Gasparyan, A. Y., Nurmashev, B., Seksenbayev, B., Trukhachev, V. I., Kostyukova, E. I.,
& Kitas, G. D. (2017). Plagiarism in the context of education and evolving detection strategies.
Journal of Korean medical science, 32(8), 1220-1227.
Park, C. (2004). Rebels without a clause: Towards an institutional framework for dealing
with plagiarism by students. Journal of further and Higher Education, 28(3), 291-306.
Šprajc, P., Urh, M., Jerebic, J., Trivan, D., & Jereb, E. (2017). Reasons for plagiarism in
higher education. Organizacija, 50(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/orga-2017-0002
Sikes, P. (2009). Will the real author come forward? Questions of ethics, plagiarism, theft
and collusion in academic research writing. International Journal of Research & Method in
Education, 32(1), 13-24.