Sept 30 Lecture
Sept 30 Lecture
Sept 30 Lecture
1
READING REFLECTION
2
DISCUSSION
• Discussion Question: Do you think the media helped or hurt the West Memphis
Three? Overall, do you think the media helps or hinders the justice system?
• Write answers and reasoning for each question on one sheet of paper and have every
group member sign it
3
PARADISE LOST
• Social Structure Theory: Explain delinquency using socioeconomic conditions and cultural values
• Socioeconomic conditions: Poverty, neighborhood deterioration, concentrated disadvantage
• High poverty areas have higher delinquency rates (Or do they? Arrest and Crime rates are not the same)
• Cultural values: Culture of poverty?, subcultural tolerance of deviance?, gang/delinquency culture, legal cynicism…
• Do high poverty areas have different cultural values that make delinquency and crime more likely?
• Social Disorganization Theory (SDT): Inability of community to exert social control allows youths freedom to
engage in delinquency
• Two types of social control:
• 1. Formal social control: Police, schools, teachers (formal social control agents of the state)
• 2. Informal control: Parents, family, neighbors (informal agents who also maintain social control in society)
• Communities with social disorganization have less informal social control which leads to kids breaking the law,
joining gangs, and engaging in uncivil/destructive behavior
• SDT first posited by Clifford Shaw and Henry McKay (1942) and later developed by Robert Sampson most
notably in Great American City (2011)
• Theory: Areas with social disorganization pass on deviant traditions and delinquent values to children (cultural
transmission) which increase crime and delinquency
• Economic/racial inequality exacerbate social disorganization (relative deprivation/concentrated disadvantage)
while collective efficacy helps reduce disorganization and crime/delinquency
9
THE CYCLE OF SOCIAL
DISORGANIZATION
10
SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION CRITIQUES
• Critiques of SDT:
• Overpredicts crime/delinquency for lower-income and minority residents and struggles to explain why
rich people commit crime (Offending Rates similar across class for juveniles)
• SDT studies never capture rich or rural areas (do rich people care about or trust their neighbors?)
• No evidence lower-income neighborhoods have deviant subcultures (nobody likes crime!)
• Ignores police discretion in arrest rates (lower class arrested more, but Arrest and Crime rates are different!)
• Legal cynicism (less trust in police/law) is higher in lower income areas (Sampson and Bartusch 1998)
• Why this matters: Deviant subculture theories blame poor people and indirectly racial minorities for crime
through ‘culture’ while legal cynicism blames police/justice system for crime by being biased/illegitimate
11
ANOMIE/STRAIN THEORY
• Anomie/Strain Theory:
• 1. People share similar values/goals, such as good education, nice home/car, family, material comforts…
• 2. But ability to achieve these goals is stratified by socioeconomic class
• Harder for the lower class to achieve the ‘American Dream’
• 3. Inability to achieve goals will cause frustration and anger or ‘strain’
• Sharp divisions between rich and poor can create violence and aggression
• The lower class is expected to have higher delinquency rates because they have more strain
12
ANOMIE/STRAIN THEORY
• Anomie (Robert Merton): Without acceptable means for obtaining success individuals feel social and
psychological strain
• Youths who lack acceptable means may use deviant methods to achieve goals or reject socially accepted goals for
deviant ones (either way increased likelihood of delinquency as goals/means influence behavior)
• Negative Affective States: Anger, depression, disappointment, fear, and other adverse emotions from
strain all make delinquency more likely
• Research supports those with strain more likely to be delinquent (may provide relief to strain)
• Those with more support from family, friends, and social institutions are better able to cope with strain
and less likely to engage in delinquency
• Differential Opportunity Theory: Posits lower class youths whose legitimate means are limited join gangs
and pursue criminal careers
• Related to strain theory juveniles become criminals as alternative means to achieve goals (the American Dream)
18
CRITIQUES OF ANOMIE/STRAIN THEORY
• Critiques:
• Over predicts lower-income crime and under predicts middle and upper-income crime
• Fails to explain white-collar criminals (many already achieved success through legitimate means)
• Over predicts racial minorities committing crime
• Why? They have more ‘strain’ due to discrimination/racism
• Does not account for group inequality in criminal justice system and unequal police deployment in
‘socially disorganized’ areas
• Does lower class actually offend more or are they just more heavily policed/arrested?
• Does society have a common goal? Is it the ‘American Dream’
• People may strive for a variety of different goals
19
SOCIAL STRUCTURE THEORY AND POLICY
• SDT and Anomie/Strain Theory Policy Implications: Both theories view delinquency rooted in
poverty/stratification so reducing poverty will decrease delinquency
• Programs to combat delinquency should provide youth with greater opportunities to rewards of
conventional society (increase access to legitimate means)
• Mentoring, school/job training programs, community outreach programs, financial aid for education, public
assistance programs, improving community structures, neighborhood restoration programs…
• Example: Crime rates decrease when families receive more public assistance
• Punishment and incarceration would not be expected to reduce delinquency
• Stigma and economic penalty of incarceration will reduce access to legitimate means and increase crime
20
NEXT STEP
21