Influence of Applying VARK Learning Styles On Enhancing Teaching Skills: Application of Learning Theories
Influence of Applying VARK Learning Styles On Enhancing Teaching Skills: Application of Learning Theories
Influence of Applying VARK Learning Styles On Enhancing Teaching Skills: Application of Learning Theories
Abstract
Background Social media in our networks have been exploited as dynamic learning tools and free platforms.
Aims The main objective of this study is to determine the impact of VARK learning styles (visual (V), aural (A), read/
write (R), and kinesthetic (K)) in enhancing parasitological laboratory skills using social media and various learning
theories.
Methods A research sample of 100 chemists working in Mega Alfa labs underwent online learning of laboratory
parasitology skills via Facebook posts and WhatsApp dictated messages for an average of 7 weeks. All posts served
various VARK learning styles and were designed based on Zeigarnik’s effect (conducting information with tactical
breaks), memory storage and retrieval strength theories (repetition of information). Trainees were classified according
to their VARK learning style preferences and were evaluated through pre/post-tests. Data on VARK learning styles
were summarized using frequency (count) and relative frequency (percentage). Data of pre-test and post-test scores
were summarized using mean and standard deviation. T-test was used to compare pre-test and post-test scores.
The difference between the pre-test results, the post-test results and the preferred learning style was analyzed using
ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc testing. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results In a total of 100 trainees, tri-modal and multimodal learning styles were preferred by 40% and 30% of the
trainees respectively; on the contrary, the unimodal and bimodal learning styles were the least preferred. In the
trimodal and multimodal groups, the post-test results showed significant increase when compared with the pre-test
results. Also, using the ANOVA test and a Tukey’s post-hoc comparison, the assemblage of multiple learning styles
(tri-modal and multimodal) appeared to significantly improve the learning performance in the post-test results when
compared with the unimodal and bimodal groups.
Conclusion The tri-modal and multimodal learning styles were found to influence the acquirement of the laboratory
parasitology skills much better than the unimodal and bimodal learning styles. Kinesthetic learning should have a
special emphasis in training.
Keywords Facebook, WhatsApp, VARK model, Zeigarnik’s effect, Memory storage, Retrieval strength
*Correspondence:
Amal M. Mahfoz
[email protected]
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
© The Author(s) 2024. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use,
sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and
the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included
in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
El-Saftawy et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:1034 Page 2 of 9
of this learning style preference on the proficiency of the supplied with narrated commentary, and discussions on
laboratory skills. the most commonly asked questions. The material was
subdivided into three consecutive courses.
Methodology
Study setting The online platform
The current study was carried out with the cooperation
of the training units related to the Mega Alfa labs starting a) A WhatsApp group Data were executed in the
from October 2018 to December 2021. form of dictated messages. Each course was for
consecutive 50 ± 5 days (i.e. average of 7 weeks).
Study population b) A Facebook page Exploiting the habit of scrolling
A cross-sectional study was conducted on a total of 100 through daily posts a Facebook page was constructed
chemists, 61 were male and 39 females, aged between with the hyperlink https://www.facebook.com/
22 years to 25 years old. A pre-post design study was Parasitology-for-All-112721744195736.
conducted. Thirteen OSPE stations were constructed to
simulate multiple tasks and to assess certain intended The authors have chosen social media as an e-learning
learning objectives (ILOs) [25]. Inclusion criteria: platform to deliver the training material in visual, audi-
recently graduated chemists who are receiving training tory and kinesthetic modalities for a variety of reasons
to be hired. Exclusion criteria: chemists who are already including the modern behavioral patterns in frequently
hired in the workplace and graduated for more than 1 navigating to the social media, preference of network
year. The sample size is calculated using the following technology for transfer of information and interest of the
formula: n = 2 (Za + Z1–β) 2σ2, Δ2 where n = 100 [26]. trainees in the online teaching approach rather than the
traditional education. The social media is also cost-effec-
Ethical consideration tive being a feasible tool in the hands of every partici-
The aim of the study was described to the trainees, and pant. The social media platforms also offered the trainees
written consent was obtained before conducting the schedule flexibility, easy interaction and simple achieve-
VARK questionnaire. Chemists were free to accept ment orientation. Investigating how the trainees learn-
or refuse the filling of the questionnaire by the end ing styles affect the quality of post-test performance is
of the training course. Also, they were free not to con- also better achieved through the social media. The social
tinue training at any time. The study was approved by media also represented a suitable platform for delivering
the Institutional Review Board and Ethical Commit- the different VARK learning style variables that engage
tee of 6th October University (approval number PRC- the participants’ kinesthetic, auditory, visual, and read-
Me-2311008). Before enrolment, written informed write senses through different multimedia forms (Videos,
consent was obtained from all the participants, wherein text, photographs, audios, graphics and interactive mate-
they were informed that they could freely withdraw from rial etc.). This endeavor would yield a more accurate illus-
the study. There would be no negative consequences tration of the learning style preferences of the laboratory
from opting not to participate in the study. All methods trainees and the effect of incorporation of these learning
were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines styles on the real-life practical proficiency in the lab field.
and regulations, including the Code of Practice for the
Care and Use of Human Subjects for Scientific Purposes Core features of the training courses
according to the Declaration of Helsinki (2013).
a) Scripts Scripts were manipulated to distribute the
Pretest and post-test assessment information among chemists irrespective of their
Pre-tests and post-tests were conducted at the start and levels of expertise. Overall, the author used a simple
end of the three training courses consecutively to test display of information to encourage engagement and
the acquisition of the trainees to the training course’s interactivity [27, 28].
intended learning objectives (ILOs). Each test was com- b) The applied theories The educational material was
posed of thirteen questions (3 case studies, 4 MCQ published and shared regularly, repeatedly, and in
questions, and 6 microscopic identifications), and each pieces applying the theory of memory storage and
question scored one mark, i.e. 13 is the maximum score. retrieval recovery strengths and Zeigarnik’s effect;
additionally, all material was designed to serve two
The learning material or more components of the VARK learning styles.
The current study introduced medical contexts for para- Visual in the form of labeled images in mini-
sitic diseases, various laboratory skills “safety, quality, videos and posts; auditory in the form of audio
…”, labeled mini-videos (40 ± 10 s.) for microscopic fields commentary in the mini-videos and explanations;
El-Saftawy et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:1034 Page 4 of 9
reading/writing in the form of textual reviews and styles scoring equal records, bi-, tri-, or multi-modal
discussions; and kinesthetic through encouraging learning styles are determined, respectively. The
the trainees for the digital sharing of images and questionnaire followed formerly validated scoring
videos captured during their real work life. Posts guidelines [10] (Fig. 2).
involved figures that were labeled by the author
as in Fig. 1. Chemists were grouped according to
their VARK preferences and underwent post-test Statistical analysis and operational definitions
assessment by the end of the training course. Data were coded and entered using the statistical pack-
c) Repetitive publication of the videos and photos was age for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 28 (IBM Corp.,
done to increase interaction and involvement by the Armonk, NY, USA). Data on VARK learning styles were
trainees through their comments. The trainees were summarized using frequency (count) and relative fre-
provoked to ask the trainer on the WhatsApp group quency (percentage). Data of pre-test and post-test scores
to accomplish the previous incompletely explained were summarized using mean and standard deviation.
slide to achieve the information and discriminate The T-test was used to compare pre-test and post-test
different parasites microscopically; thus, attaining scores. The difference between the pre-test results, the
interaction by the trainees using the Zeigarnik effect post-test results and the preferred learning style was ana-
and memory storage and retrieval recovery theories. lyzed using ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc testing. P-val-
ues less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Fig. 1 Conduction of educational material. (A), (B) A model for the dictated data in the WhatsApp group with labelled figures for different parasites.
(C) The whole procedure of the online training. ZE: Zeigarnik’s effect; MS&RS: memory storage and retrieval strengths theory; R: receive posts; S: send
anonymous microscopic structures and inquiries
El-Saftawy et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:1034 Page 5 of 9
Fig. 3 VARK assessment. A Distribution of VARK within the unimodal (single preference). B and C Distribution of the bi, tri, and multimodal learning styles
Table 1 Pre- and post-scores in the different groups of the VARK learning styles
Unimodal Bimodal Trimodal Multimodal
Mean Standard deviation Mean Standard deviation Mean Standard deviation Mean Standard deviation
Pre-test scores 1.30 0.82 1.30 0.80 2.65 1.00 2.80 1.10
Post-test scores 1.40 0.52 1.40 0.50 12.33 1.25 12.37 1.38
P-value 0.678 0.541 < 0.001 < 0.001
the trainees). Notably, in the trimodal style of learning, Pre- and post-scores in the different groups of the VARK
kinesthetic (active) learning provided with other learn- learning styles
ing styles had the highest records. Nevertheless, the uni- The mean values of post-test results were (1.530 ± 0.376,
modal and bimodal styles had lower scores (10% and 20%, 1.530 ± 0.278, 12.278 ± 0.184, and 12.299 ± 0.215) in the
respectively). The results also revealed that a definite sin- unimodal, bimodal, trimodal, and multi-modal styles,
gle preference was noticed in only 10% of the chemists, respectively. Using the T-test, the pre-test and post-
where the predominantly preferred learning style was the test scores in both the trimodal and multimodal groups
kinesthetic followed by the visual style (Fig. 3). revealed significant differences (Table 1).
El-Saftawy et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:1034 Page 6 of 9
Post-test results in the different groups of the VARK The current model showed that the kinesthetic style
learning styles was almost preferred either solely (unimodal) or in com-
Comparison between the effect of the VARK learning bination with other learning styles (bimodal, trimodal,
style on the post-test results using ANOVA test with and multimodal) followed by the visual style. This was
Tukey’s post-hoc test showed that the tri-modal and reflected by improved performance of the trainees in the
multimodal learning styles had better performance with techniques of biological sample preparation and identifi-
statistically significant difference (p-value < 0.001) when cation of pathogens. A plausible explanation to the kines-
compared with the unimodal and bimodal learning styles thetic preference among the participants is the practical
as shown in Table 2. nature of the laboratory field and the importance of accu-
rate manipulation of the techniques in the trainees’ pro-
Based on estimated marginal means fessional development. The trainees endorsed increased
interest and reliance on shifting to practical and labora-
Discussion tory training rather than the academic didactic-focused
The current study has been designed to investigate the teaching in the faculty of science graduating chemists.
learning style preferences of the chemist trainees, while This preference also highlights the critical need for incor-
examining the effects of those learning styles on the pro- porating in-depth practical training for the newly-gradu-
ficiency of the lab skills in the context of the differences ated chemist candidates before receiving an occupation
of the pre/post-test results. in a diagnostic laboratory. This helps in interpretation of
Knowledge about learning styles is crucial for the prog- the assimilated theoretical knowledge into real-life labo-
ress of medical education, especially in the health-related ratory skills that serve the future career.
disciplines [29]. In the current study, about 70% of the Previous studies have reported variable learning style
trainees showed a trimodal and multimodal learning preferences in different studied fields. For example in the
preference, which is consistent with the previous learn- field of nursing, visual learning was the most preferred
ing style preference recorded on investigations of medi- style, followed by the kinesthetic and auditory styles
cal [20] and pharmacy [21] students denoting the role of [35]. Also, dental students prefered visual learning to the
multimodal learning on enhancing brain perception and kinesthetic style [36]. A plausible explanation of the dis-
achievement of learning goals [30]. Our results are also crepancy between our results and the aforementioned is
in agreement with the results of a questionnaire-based that the learning style preference appears to be tailored
study supporting the effects of VARK-dependent learn- according to the needs of the trainees to proficiently fill
ing in physician assistant [31] and management pro- their deficiencies. It also differs according to the field of
grams [32]. Ghobain and Zughaibi [33] speculated that study and the ILOs required from the training.
multimodal education is a considerable chance for bet- Assemblage of multiple learning styles (tri-modal
ter education. Previous neuroscience research has also and multimodal) appeared to significantly improve the
revealed that multiple representations of content using post-test results when compared with the unimodal and
multimedia improved learning outcomes across the dif- bimodal groups. This result reflects the advantageous
ferent learning styles [34]. Taken together, those results effect of training using various learning styles to enhance
highlight the necessity of integrating the different learn- knowledge recognition and practical proficiencies which
ing styles to fit the multiple training needs. gives the multimodal learning trainees an advantage over
other peers.
Table 2 Post-test assessment using the hoc pairwise Integration of the sensory and motor inputs appeared
comparison test between groups to affect the perception and processing of information,
Group P value thereby helping in the practical training process. Com-
Unimodal learning style Bimodal learning style 1.000 parable results have been reported by Tabatabei (2018)
Trimodal learning style < 0.001 [31] who confirmed the crucial role of manipulating vari-
Multimodal learning style < 0.001 ous senses with the VARK learning styles in enhancing
Bimodal learning style Unimodal learning style 1.000 deep learning. Similarly, Liu (2021) [37] has highlighted
Trimodal learning style < 0.001 the importance of implementing multiple sensory inputs
Multimodal learning style < 0.001 in the success of the training process. Dantas and Cunha
Trimodal learning style Unimodal learning style < 0.001 (2020) [38] speculated that a successful learning process
Bimodal learning style < 0.001 achieved through integration of different learning styles
Multimodal learning style 0.936 leads to neuronal interconnections in the cerebral cortex.
Multimodal learning style Unimodal learning style < 0.001 This might reflect the provoking effects of the learning
Bimodal learning style < 0.001 styles on the interpersonal attitude toward sharing and
Trimodal learning style 0.936
El-Saftawy et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:1034 Page 7 of 9
searching for knowledge, internal motivation, behavior, more comprehensive way, which, in turn, leads to opti-
and practice [39]. mal practical performance, enhanced motivation and
According to Felder [40] each learning style has its improved employee engagement.
potencies and flaws if manipulated individually. For
example, addressing distant blended multimodal learning Recommendations
styles requires good online learning experiences [41], but Future large multicenter studies testing the implemen-
it has, on the other hand, immense promises for improv- tation of the multimodal learning styles in the different
ing the efficiency of distance learning and empowering practical laboratory sub-fields (microbiology, biochem-
deeper understanding of the subject matter [31, 36]. istry, hematology, biotechnology, computational analy-
Recent studies have also illustrated the crucial role of sis, etc.) are recommended to build an encompassing
enhancing the learning approaches using modern meth- framework for identifying the ideal educational design
ods such as the tree machine learning model for optimiz- for accommodating the diverse learning preferences and
ing the practice in the dental field [42], the mixed reality develop the best ways of optimizing the required skills in
technologies to enhance in the surgical skills [43] and the a personalized learning approach according to the spe-
educational video resources to improve teaching of clini- cific laboratory specialties.
cal examination [44].
Author contributions
E. S. contributed to study conception, writing original draft, methodology
Conclusion and collection of data, A. A. designed the research and wrote the manuscript.
This study is the first to illustrate the learning style pref- Verification, validation, resources were done by A.S. and M. (A) A. M. oversight
the project, validation, (B) A.: contributed to methodology, writing, reviewing
erences of chemist trainees and examine how such pref- and editing. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript.
erences affect lab skill competency in the light of the All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
variations in pre- and post-OSCE test outcomes.
Funding
The study represents a promising training model None.
for bridging the gap between the traditional theoreti- Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation
cal faculty education and the hands-on laboratory skills Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank
(EKB).
required for practicing applied parasitology through
implementation of the different components of the VARK Data availability
learning styles via investing in the technology in hands, The data used and analyzed during the current study are available from the
corresponding author upon reasonable request.
(i.e. cell phones and social media applications).
Since different individuals have unique preferences for
Declarations
learning, thus understanding and applying the visual,
auditory, reading/writing, and kinesthetic models is a key Ethics approval and consent to participate
approach for fostering an inclusive learning style based The study was approved from the Institutional Review Board and Ethical
Committee of 6th October University (approval number PRC-Me-2311008).
on each individual preference. The study, thereby, has Before enrolment, written informed consent was obtained from all the
tailored the practical material of the parasitology train- participants, wherein they were informed that they could freely withdraw
ing to fit the various VARK learning styles. The Zeigar- from the study. There would be no negative consequences from opting not
to participate in the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with
nik approach (implemented through short videos and relevant guidelines and regulations, including the Code of Practice for the
petite didactic notes) and the retrieval recovery approach Care and Use of Human Subjects for Scientific Purposes according to the
(applied through repeated material publication) appeared Declaration of Helsinki (2013).
to enhance the model’s results and the memory storage of Consent for publication
knowledge. This was reflected on the trainees’ preference None.
of the tri-modal and multimodal strategies of the VARK
Competing interests
model. The trimodal and multimodal approaches were The authors declare no competing interests.
also related to the highest post-test achievements among
the trainees; which again elucidates the beneficial role of Author details
1
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo
exposure to multiple sensory and motor inputs. University, Cairo, Egypt
While the different VARK learning strategies now 2
Department of Medical Parasitology, Armed Forces College of Medicine,
represent an area of extensive research in the practi- Cairo, Egypt
3
Department of Medical Parasitology, October 6th University, Healthcare
cal medical, paramedical and pharmaceutical fields, yet, Quality Excellence Diploma, Cairo, Egypt
application of the VARK educational design for the pur- 4
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University,
pose of mastering the laboratory skills, could pave the Giza 11562, Egypt
5
Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, King Khalid University,
way to best personalize teaching not only to comprehend Abha 62529, Saudi Arabia
and retain information, but also to develop an engaging 6
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy,
and efficient learning experience in a deeper, faster, and Modern University for Technology and Information, Cairo, Egypt
El-Saftawy et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:1034 Page 8 of 9
7
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo 21. Wani Jailani NE, Suratman S, Maniam S, Ali AA. Assessment of Undergraduate
University, Cairo, Egypt Pharmacy Student Learning styles using the VARK Questionnaire. Malaysian J
Med Health Sci. 2023;19(12):7–14.
Received: 25 February 2024 / Accepted: 2 September 2024 22. Maidin S, Shahrum MA, Qian LY, Rajendran TK, Ismail S. Effective blended
learning model selection based on Student Learning style using Analytic
Hierarchy process for an Undergraduate Engineering Course. Int J Eng.
2023;36(12):2232–42.
23. Van Der Wege M, Kiel S. VARK: linking teaching strategies to Preferred Learn-
References ing styles in nursing. Int J Nurs. 2020;7(12):1–5.
1. Accettone SL, DeFrancesco C, King CA, Lariviere MK. Laboratory skills assign- 24. Chaudhry NA, Ashar A, Ahmad SA. Association of Visual, Aural, Read/Wite,
ments as a Teaching Tool to develop Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ and Kinesthetic (VARK) learning styles and academic performances of dental
conceptual understanding of practical laboratory skills. J Chem Educ. students. Pakistan Armed Forces Med J. 2020;70(1):S58–63.
2023;100(3):1138–48. 25. Dewan P, Khalil S, Gupta P. Objective structured clinical examination for
2. Sumin VI, Smolentseva TE, Belokurov SV, Lankin OV. Information model of teaching and assessment: evidence-based critique. Clin Epidemiol Global
trainees characteristics with definition of stochastic behavior of dynamic Health. 2024;25:101477.
system. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018; 973 (1): 012047. 26. Sharma SK, Mudgal SK, Thakur K, Gaur R. How to calculate sample size for
3. Elfar E, Asem N, Yousof H. The awareness of neglected tropical diseases in a observational and experimental nursing research studies. Natl J Physiol
sample of medical and nursing students in Cairo University, Egypt: a cross- Pharm Pharmacol. 2020;10(1):1–8.
sectional study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 November;14(11):e0008826. https:// 27. Saftawy E. Artificial intelligence in Medical Parasitology between hopes and
doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008826. fears. Parasitologists United J. 2023;16(2):94–9.
4. Eladawy A, Elsaftawy E, Nagi G, Abdel Fattah M. An Educational experi- 28. Brame CJ. Effective educational videos: principles and guidelines for maximiz-
ment in parasitology implemented on Preclinical Medical Students in ing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sci Educ. 2016;15(4):es6.
Discipline-based and Integrated Programs at AFCM. J Health Prof Edu Innov. 29. Muijsenberg AJ, Houben-Wilke S, Zeng Y, Spruit MA, Janssen DJ. Methods to
2024;1(1):13–25. https://doi.org/10.21608/JHPEI.2024.248231.1001. assess adults’ learning styles and factors affecting learning in health educa-
5. Bada AA, Jita LC. Integrating brain-based learning in the Science Classroom: a tion: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2023;107:107588.
systematic review. Int J Pedagogy Teacher Educ. 2022;6(1):24–36. 30. Hernandez JE, Vasan N, Huff S, Melovitz-Vasan C. Learning styles/preferences
6. El-Sabagh HA. Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and among medical students: kinesthetic learner’s multimodal approach to learn-
its impact on development students’ engagement. Int J Educational Technol ing anatomy. Med Sci Educ. 2020;30(4):1633–8.
High Educ. 2021;18(1):53. 31. Tabatabei E. Innovative, creative VARK learning styles improvement strategies.
7. Wahyudin AY, Wahyuni A. Exploring students’ learning style and proficiency Global J Foreign Lang Teach. 2018;8(3):87–93.
at a University in Indonesia: a quantitative Classroom Research. Teknosastik. 32. Espinoza-Poves JL, Miranda-Vilchez WA, Chafloque-Céspedes R. The Vark
2022;20(2):77–85. Learning styles among University students of business schools. J Educational
8. Estrada FJP, García-Prieto FJ, Conde-Vélez S. Learning styles in university stu- Psychology-Propositos y Representaciones. 2019;7(2):401–15.
dents: types of strategies, materials, supports, evaluation and performance. 33. Ghobain E, Zughaibi AA. Multimodal fits all: revisiting the relevance of Per-
Case Study. Eur J Contemp Educ. 2020;9(2):394–409. ceptual Learning styles in Higher Education today. Theory Pract Lang Stud.
9. Tonkaboni A, Pareshkooh MK, Manafi S, Mendes RA, Kharazifard MJ. Different 2024;14(4):995–1004.
scoring methods of the VARK questionnaire to evaluate dentistry students’ 34. Kotiash I, Shevchuk I, Borysonok M, Matviienko I, Popov M, Terekhov V, Kuchai
learning styles. Eur J Dent Educ Eur J Dent Educ. 2022;00:1–5. https://doi. O. Possibilities of using Multimedia technologies in Education. Int J Comput
org/10.1111/eje.12835. Sci Netw Secur. 2022;22(6):727–32.
10. Karim MR, Talukder MHK, Mondol RU, Ghose RK, Hossain MMI. Learning 35. Jahan S, Ali S, Bahadur S, Muhammad D, Aisha I, Ahmad T. Learning Styles
styles of Undergraduate Medical Students and their relation with Preferred Association with academic performance among nursing students. Rehman J
teaching-learning methods. TAJ: J Teachers Association. 2022;35(2):19–26. Health Sci. 2024;6(1):57–63.
11. Khanal L, Giri J, Shah S, Koirala S, Rimal J. Influence of learning-style prefer- 36. Aldosari MA, Aljabaa AH, Al-Sehaibany FS, Albarakati SF. Learning style
ences in academic performance in the subject of human anatomy: an preferences of dental students at a single institution in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia,
institution-based study among preclinical medical students. Adv Med Educ evaluated using the VARK questionnaire. Adv Med Educ Pract 2018; 179–86.
Pract 2019; 343–55. 37. Liu X, Nagai Y, Yabuuchi K, Cui X. Use interactive media to enhance creativity
12. Inam S, Haq A. Exploring the Preferred Learning styles among first and final of designers by stimulating the senses in the context of art design education.
year MBBS students using VARK Inventory at Fauji Foundation Hospital Rawal- Proc Des Soc. 2021;1:3319–28.
pindi. Health Professions Educ J. 2022;5(1):9–13. 38. Dantas LA, Cunha A. An integrative debate on learning styles and the learn-
13. MacLeod CM. Zeigarnik and Von Restorff: the memory effects and the stories ing process. Social Sci Humanit Open. 2020;2(1):100017.
behind them. Mem Cognit. 2020;48:1073–88. 39. Li J, Xue E. Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and
14. Jean PH. Brain-based and learning theories: application of theories in the learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influ-
classroom. Eur J Educ Stud. 2019;5(12):225–42. encing factors. Behav Sci. 2023;13(1):59.
15. Frankland PW, Josselyn SA, Köhler S. The neurobiological foundation of 40. Felder RM. Opinion: uses, misuses, and validity of learning styles. Adv Eng
memory retrieval. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(10):1576–85. Educ. 2020;8(1):1–16.
16. El Saftawy EA. Evaluating the Cognitive Engagement and Pre/Post Assess- 41. Philippe S, Souchet AD, Lameras P, Petridis P, Caporal J, Coldeboeuf G, Duzan
ment ratings after blended teaching of parasitology skills. Educational Res H. Multimodal teaching, learning and training in virtual reality: a review and
Innov J. 2023;3(9):1–13. case study. Virtual Real Intell Hardw. 2020;2(5):421–42.
17. Kumar A, Kugler J, Jensen T. Evaluation of trainees competency with point- 42. Shoaib L, Azura SH, Safii N, Idris. Ruhaya Hussin, and Muhamad Amin
of-care ultrasonography (POCUS): a conceptual framework and review of Hakim Sazali. Utilizing decision tree machine learning model to map dental
existing assessments. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34(6):1025–31. students’ preferred learning styles with suitable instructional strategies. BMC
18. Fauth F, González-Martíne J. Trainees perceptions of Instructional Design in Med Educ. 2024;24(1):58.
continuous online learning and learning transfer. Educ Res Int. 2021. https:// 43. Guha P, Lawson J, Minty I, Kinross J, Martin G. Can mixed reality technolo-
doi.org/10.1155/2021/3121559. gies teach surgical skills better than traditional methods? A prospective
19. Purwanto A, Fahmi K, Cahyono Y. The benefits of using social media in the randomised feasibility study. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):144.
learning process of students in the digital literacy era and the education 4.0
era. J Inform Syst Manage (JISMA). 2023;2(2):1–7.
20. Das A, Chakraborty A, Sukul B. Learning styles of undergraduate medical
students–A cross sectional study using VARK questionnaire. J Indian Acad
Forensic Med. 2020;42(1):49–53.
El-Saftawy et al. BMC Medical Education (2024) 24:1034 Page 9 of 9
44. Flatt E, Brewer P, Racy M, Mushtaq F, Ashworth R, Ali F, Tomlinson J. Can edu-
cational video resources improve learning when used to augment traditional Publisher’s note
teaching of clinical examination? A randomized control trial of novice medi- Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
cal students. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):21. published maps and institutional affiliations.