HRM3704 Study Notes 2018
HRM3704 Study Notes 2018
HRM3704 Study Notes 2018
Together We Pass
www.togetherwepass.co.za
Please remember to use these notes in conjunction with all our other features. The most important
of which is to work together with the lecturers and your fellow students in the study group.
Teaching is the best way to learn, so make sure you answer other students’ questions as often as
you post your own questions on areas where you’re struggling.
What else do you get to assist you in passing when you join a Together We Pass study group?
• A lecturer/guide to answer questions, facilitate discussions, and ensure you remain on track
and motivated in your studies
• A discussion forum where you can ask for help with difficult questions, from other students
as well as your dedicated lecturer
We at Together We Pass wish everyone the best of luck this semester, and we look forward to working
with you!
Should you want to get in touch with us, please view our contact details below:
Together We Pass
EMAIL [email protected]
WEB www.togetherwepass.co.za
FB www.facebook.com/togetherwepass
GOOGLE+ Together We Pass on Google+
TWITTER @togetherwepass
Evolution of HRM
Period before industrial revolution – The society was primarily an agriculture economy with
limited production. Number of specialized crafts was limited and was usually carried out within a
village or community with apprentices assisting the master craftsmen. Communication channel
were limited.
An important event in industrial revolution was growth of Labor Union (1790) – The works
working in the industries or factories were subjected to long working hours and very less wages.
With growing unrest, workers across the world started protest and this led to the establishment
of Labor unions. To deal with labor issues at one end and management at the other Personnel
Management department had to be capable of politics and diplomacy, thus the industrial relation
department emerged.
Post Industrial revolution – The term Human resource Management saw a major evolution after
1850. Various studies were released and many experiments were conducted during this period
which gave HRM altogether a new meaning and importance.
A brief overview of major theories release during this period is presented below
Frederick W. Taylor gave principles of scientific management (1857 o 1911) led to the
evolution of scientific human resource management approach which was involved in:
Worker’s training
Hawthorne studies, conducted by Elton Mayo & Fritz Roethlisberger (1927 to 1940).
Observations and findings of Hawthorne experiment shifted the focus of Human resource
from increasing worker’s productivity to increasing worker’s efficiency through greater
work satisfaction.
Douglas McGregor Theory X and Theory Y (1960) and Abraham Maslow’s Hierarchy of
needs ( 1954) – These studies and observations led to the transition from the
administrative and passive Personnel Management approach to a more dynamic Human
Resource Management approach which considered workers as a valuable resource.
As a result of these principles and studies, Human resource management became increasingly
line management function, linked to core business operations. Some of the major activities of HR
department are listed as:
With increase in technology and knowledge base industries and as a result of global competition,
Human Resource Management is assuming more critical role today. Its major accomplishment is
aligning individual goals and objectives with corporate goals and objectives. Strategic HRM
focuses on actions that differentiate the organization from its competitors and aims to make long
term impact on the success of organization.
Employer-Employee Relationship
The term 'employee relations' refers to a company's efforts to manage relationships between
employers and employees. An organization with a good employee relations program provides fair
and consistent treatment to all employees so they will be committed to their jobs and loyal to the
company. Many typical employer-employee relationships will vary on the scale of closeness and
familiarity, but it is essential that all employer-employee relationships involve at least these five
major characteristics:
1. Mutual respect
It’s perfectly fine to instigate a closer relationship with your employees to the point of socializing
with them outside of work. (This is particularly common in smaller businesses and start-ups).
But even in a relaxed workplace, it is crucial to retain the traditional hierarchal structure and
encourage awareness of this in your employees.
2. Mutual reliance
There should be a balanced amount of reliance on both employer and employee. The employer
relies on the employee to do his or her job well for the benefit of the business; the employee
relies on the employer to treat them fairly and pay them equitably.
When this mutual reliance becomes imbalanced or one-way, problems will inevitably occur.
Employers can help create a forum of openness and honesty by asking employees candidly about
their lives, families, and interests. Employees can, in return, contribute to this setting by being
forthcoming about their lives outside of work.
Employers should want their employees to reach their full potential and recognize when their
capabilities exceed their current role. Leaving natural abilities to stagnate will cause boredom and
frustration to grow in the employee, and as mentioned earlier, waste valuable energy that could
better help the team.
5. Gratitude
Gratitude should exist on both sides of the relationship, but it is probably a larger responsibility of
the employer to recognize and appreciate exceptional effort from their employees.
When employees consistently deliver and receive little or no appreciation, it can become very
easy for them to become disheartened, frustrated, and apathetic about their job, which destroys
productivity.
When employees consistently deliver and receive little or no appreciation, it can become very
easy for them to become disheartened, frustrated, and apathetic about their job, which destroys
productivity.
HRM has developed over time from mere administrative role to modern role of strategic
development. Strategic HRM has gained both credibility and popularity over the past
decade, employee are considered as part of the overall strategy.
Recruitment and retention - Aware of labour market, recruitment source and key talent
retention.
Employer of choice - To engage the best talent and keep these people engaged.
• Discuss the role of the different mind-sets in maintaining the competitive advantage in the
new competitive landscape.
Competitive Advantage
Historically: a matter of position, companies occupied a competitive space and built and defended
their market share competitive advantage depended on the area in which business was located
and where it chose to provide its goods and services known as the strategic model strategy
worked well in stable environment (for large and dominant organizations) with rapid competition
appearing, new meaning of ‘competitive advantage’ emerged
These attributes may include access to natural resources, such as high grade ores or
inexpensive power, highly skilled personnel, geographic location, high entry barriers, etc.
New technologies, such as robotics and information technology, can also provide
competitive advantage, whether as a part of the product itself, as an advantage to the
making of the product, or as a competitive aid in the business process (for example,
better identification and understanding of customers).
Michael Porter defined the two types of competitive advantage an organization can achieve
relative to its rivals: lower cost or differentiation.
A differential advantage is created when a firm's products or services differ from its competitors
and are seen as better than a competitor's products by customers.
The differences in company resources across an industry will be reflected in the variability
in profits generated by them
No two companies are alike, because no two companies have had the same
Set of experiences, acquired the same assets and skills or built the same organization
culture
Question of rarity - how many other companies already possess the valuable resources?
Strategic fit - aligning a company strategy and its resources with the environment, a
company can achieve superior performance
Strategic flexibility - the ability of a company to adjust to the changes (when rapid external
and internal changes takes place the strategic fit becomes more challenging)
How can a company sustain strategic fit whilst enjoying flexibility in acompetitiveenvironment?
Give a system flexibility within the company which allows it to create batches of unique
products quickly, at a relatively low cost, as and when required
Basis for this flexibility can be made possible by installing a company culture based on
creativity and quick response
RBV
identify HR's best practices, specify and measure the bundles of typologies of HR practices
associated with the high performance of labour
Process approach is anchored in both the resource-based view and the best-
practices theory, integrating economic considerations with social legitimacy aspects
To limit the damage that can occur as a result of losses, companies can design and
implement turnover management strategies;
Organizational interest alignment can be defined as "the degree to which the members of
the organization are motivated to behave in line with organizational goals.”
Motivation levels
Extrinsic motivation level - directly influenced by the reward system that specifies rewards for a
given behaviour, it also includes issues such as power and recognition
Hedonic intrinsic motivation level - this is the enjoyment the individuals experience in
completing the task in the work environment. It can be influenced by changes in the design of
individual tasks and the task context
Normative intrinsic motivation level - driven by the goal of engaging in behaviour that is
compliant with the norms and values of the organisation
Interest alignment
Organisations can influence interest alignment positively through adjustments of the three
interest alignment levers:
Why? Companies do not only exist in isolation but also form alliances with other companies
•
Alliance partners can play a significant role in shaping the
resource-based CA of the company through network resources
Network Resources are external resources that are embedded in the company's alliance
network that provide strategic opportunities and affect company behaviour and value.
Fundamental assumption of RBV (companies must own or at least fully control the resources
that confer competitive advantage) is incorrect
It is the services that resources provide, not the resources themselves that generate value for
the company
When an alliance is formed, each participating company endows a subset of its resources to
the alliance with the expectation of generating common benefits from shared resources of both
companies
Therefore, each company possesses a subset of shared resources and a subset of non-
shared resources that together form its complete set of resources.
Evidence is found that certain HR practices can be related to company performance - such
as compensation, selection and training activities
There are notable differences across studies as to what constitutes bundles of 'HR best
practices'
Most studies focus on enhancing the skill base of employees through HR activities -
selective staffing, comprehensive training and broad developmental efforts like job
rotation and cross-utilization
3. appraisal measures
4. profit sharing
5. employment security
6. voice mechanisms
7. job definition
This new trend came about with the introduction of the strategic HR approach 3 primary
perspectives:
1. universal approach
2. contingency approach
3. configurational approach
© 2018 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
Pg.19
Universalistic approach
Huselid - assumes that there are certain best HRM practices that will contribute to, for
example, increased financial performance of a company regardless of the strategic goals
of the company
Little work has been done that provides a definitive prescription as to which HRM
practices should be included in a best-practices system
Work undertaken has either focused on single organizations like banks or only on single
jobs within organizations, without really considering some other internal or external
influences
Contingency approach:
Closely related body of research calls for a configurational approach to strategic HRM and
argues that it is the pattern of HRM practices/systems that contributes to the attainment
of organizational goals
Configurational approach argues that the fit of HRM practices/systems with the company
strategy is a vital factor but that there are specific 'ideal types' of HRM systems/practices
that provide both horizontal and vertical fit of HRM systems/practices to the
organizational structure and strategic goals
The configuration of practices/systems that provides the tightest horizontal and vertical fit
with any given strategy would then be the ideal type for an organization pursuing that
particular strategy
Vertical fit refers to the congruence of the HR system with other organizational
characteristics such as the company strategy
Configurational approach
the pattern of HRM practices and systems contribute to the attainment of organizational
goals
HRM processes can become one of the company’s strategic assets if they are able to help
realize superior profitability
HRM processes is an engine of renewal that can be used continually to adjust the way in
which a company selects, trains, socializes and evaluates its human capital and enables a
company to execute its strategy effectively
Universal adoption of best practices → company homogeneity as people come and go,
but processes remain and improve the company
Thus HRM processes are about how things are done, NOT what is produced.
LEADERSHIP
Leadership involves:
sharing that vision with others so that they will follow willingly,
providing the information, knowledge and methods to realize that vision, and
coordinating and balancing the conflicting interests of all members and stakeholders
.
It all starts with getting the right team in place – together, the whole can be greater than the sum
of its parts. You need to select the right people for the right jobs, build a complementary team,
and align your people with your organizational goals and culture.
2. Show empathy
Empathy is the ability to listen to people, relate to their emotional experience and let them know
that you are doing so. According to Iain Crossing, it is the most important core competency for
managers and leaders.
‘Developing the ability to understand people and connect with them in a genuine, meaningful way
is a key determining factor in how effective you can be at influencing them, setting them
objectives that motivate them, and rewarding them in a way they each actually find rewarding,’
says Crossing.
3. Communicate
Communication is the key to fostering empathy and building relationships of openness, trust and
honesty with your team. The first step in effective communication, according to Crossing, is to
create the time and space for people to talk, and to ask questions.
Communication needs to flow in all directions, from managers to their staff, from staff to
managers, and between team members. An effective leader is a good listener and fosters an
environment where people get to know each other and understand each other’s strengths,
weaknesses and styles. Good managers are open to the input of their staff and learn from their
feedback.
4. Lead by example
It’s also important to practice what you preach. You can’t expect your staff to work harder than
you’re willing to. As Lee says, ‘Respect doesn’t come from your position – you have to earn it.’
5. Delegate
It’s important to let your staff take ownership of their work and find their own ways of doing
things. As Crossing advises, ‘Delegate responsibility rather than tasks.’
‘Don't interfere – know when your staff can run with things.’
It’s better to tell people what you want them to do rather than telling them what you don’t want
them to do, according to Crossing. If you have to comment on poor performance, use actual
observations to demonstrate the issue and talk about behaviours (which people can change)
rather than criticise personalities or make value judgments.
This area is often neglected but can’t be overstated – it takes little effort to thank someone but it
can make all the difference to how people feel on the job.
When it comes to rewards, Iain Crossing says that it’s important to provide rewards that people
will actually find rewarding. For example, some people love to be taken out for lunch, while others
might prefer time in lieu or more autonomy or responsibility. Many managers reward people in
the way they themselves like to be rewarded, which is not always effective.
Lee emphasizes the importance of focusing on your staff’s development and says, ‘Help your
employees to succeed – their success is your success. Be patient. Coach them and coach them
and coach them ... they'll remember one day.’
The best way to coach your people is to help them focus on process rather than content,
according to Crossing. As a manager you will have people coming to you with issues and
problems, but instead of getting bogged down in the detail, coach people by asking them to
outline the problem, describe the impact the problem is having, describe what they've tried
already, define an ideal outcome, explore the resources they might use to get there, consider
possible next steps, have them try it and come back with the results. This turns the problem into a
great learning opportunity and empowers the person to solve the problem themselves.
9. Encourage innovation
It’s important for leaders to think outside the square and know when to take risks. As Wallace Lee
advises, ‘Take risks with your employees – often they bring pleasant surprises.’
10. Be flexible
Good managers have a flexible approach and adapt their style to individual employees, allowing
them to work to their own style.
Flexible workplace practices have also emerged as an increasingly important priority for many
employees.
Trait theories argue that effective leaders share a number of common personality
characteristics, or "traits."
Early trait theories said that leadership is an innate, instinctive quality that you do or
don't have. Thankfully, we've moved on from this idea, and we're learning more about
what we can do to develop leadership qualities within ourselves and others.
Trait theories help us identify traits and qualities (for example, integrity, empathy,
assertiveness, good decision-making skills, and likability) that are helpful when leading
others.
However, none of these traits, nor any specific combination of them, will guarantee
success as a leader.
Traits are external behaviours that emerge from the things going on within our minds
– and it's these internal beliefs and processes that are important for effective
leadership.
Behavioural theories focus on how leaders behave. For instance, do leaders dictate what needs to
be done and expect cooperation? Or do they involve their teams in decision-making to encourage
acceptance and support?
In the 1930s, Kurt Lewin developed a framework based on a leader's behaviour. He argued that
there are three types of leaders:
Autocratic leaders make decisions without consulting their teams. This style of leadership
is considered appropriate when decisions need to be made quickly, when there's no need
for input, and when team agreement isn't necessary for a successful outcome.
Democratic leaders allow the team to provide input before making a decision, although
the degree of input can vary from leader to leader. This style is important when team
agreement matters, but it can be difficult to manage when there are lots of different
perspectives and ideas.
Laissez-faire leaders don't interfere; they allow people within the team to make many of
the decisions. This works well when the team is highly capable, is motivated, and doesn't
need close supervision. However, this behaviour can arise because the leader is lazy or
distracted; and this is where this style of leadership can fail.
Clearly, how leaders behave affects their performance. Researchers have realized, though,
that many of these leadership behaviours are appropriate at different times. The best
leaders are those who can use many different behavioural styles, and choose the right
style for each situation.
Power and Influence Theories - Power and influence theories of leadership take an
entirely different approach – these are based on the different ways that leaders use
power and influence to get things done, and they look at the leadership styles that
emerge as a result.
Create Entrepreneurial Culture - Compensate your employees with aggressive large cash
bonuses to keep them engaged. Your team craves an achievable carrot that provide
frequent gratification. This will encourage out-sized dedication and engagement from
your employees
Best Tools for Team - Provide superb support (equipment, software, etc) for your team
and they will provide extraordinary results. It costs more than their competitors however
it enables our engineers to get more creative so we can solve our clients challenges.
Listen-Put a cork in it and listen to your clients or vendors or employees. Really listen.
Turn off your cell phone. Listen intensely. You will get more out of meetings and will draw
conclusions that will pay dividends. People will notice you are attentive and take meetings
more seriously. The duration of the meetings will decline since meetings will go faster
since everyone is engaged
Continuous Improvement - Improve yourself and your company 1% each day. By the end
of the year you will more than double your productivity or sales. Never be complacent.
Even if your team is better than your competitors, they are gunning for you. Up your game
so your clients are enchanted with your performance.
Cure Mistakes Fast or "Hire Fast, Fire Fast" - As the economy picks up, hire people to keep
up with demand. Be picky. Purge the mistaken hires quickly so that your "A" players do
not become disappointed.
Grant Freedom--Hire Great People. Hire great people and get out of their way. If you have
a wonderful person, why would you want to slow them down with pestering questions? It
slows them down from their mission and makes them second-guess themselves. They will
make mistakes but you will be way ahead on the deal if you give them opportunities for
an unfettered launch.
Mentor, Not Bully-When discussing topics with your team mates, be a counsellor.
Mentoring talent is the best way to get a dedicated engaged employee. Many leaders get a
thrill bossing around people. This bullying tendency drives down employee motivation.
Failure is the Leader's Fault-Mistakes will happen. Failure is common. Don't throw your
team under the bus. Improve systems so failure does not occur again but stand in front of
the troops or clients and take the blame. This conduct will ingratiate you with your
associates and your team will embrace you for taking the heat.
Transparent-Be unique and call it like it is. Do not beat around the bush. When you first
observe a problem, share the concern with the person that tripped up. Clearly articulate
the failure and suggest ways to improve. Strike when the facts are in and be concise in
your description of the problem and the remedy. Do not tolerate lies of omission.
Integrity -be the most honest person on the team. Do not cut corners. Do not enter the
"grey areas." People like working for honest people.
A key role of HR is ensuring that the organization has the right people performing well in
leadership roles at all levels. This means HR must focus attention in five key areas: job
architecture, incumbent assessment, performance definition, recognition for success and
building leadership capacity
HR’s most important role may well be ensuring that the organization has an ample supply
of leadership and management capability at every level of the enterprise. It is leaders,
who envision the future and help people generate the motivation to go there, and
managers, who see to it that systems, assets and processes serve their purposes
efficiently, who enable the enterprise to make the most of each employee’s contribution.
In a world where technology evolution, demographic shifts and social change are rewriting the rules of
the workplace, the role of the HR function will also continue to change. What should not change,
however, is the contribution that HR makes toward building and preserving the organization’s leadership
and management capacity. HR should remain focused on this fundamental goal, acting as ally, trusted
advisor and coach.
Leaders and corporate executives of any organization are pivotal for achieving the goals of that
company. The recruitment and selection of these company heads and executives is done by the
HR department, as it has earned the respect of the decision makers for their excellent staffing
decisions made in the past. The HR professionals who are business partners as well have to take
leadership seriously especially when making decision and offering ideas to the leaders of the
organization.
Among the assets of the company, human capital talent is by far the most important. It is the job
of the human resource management for evaluating the human resource needs of the company in
the future and making plans for retaining and recruiting the best talent. Another element of
strategic human resource management is continuous development and training of the
employees. HRM also shoulder to identify the competencies that are required for a job including
skills, knowledge and abilities, as well as develop job descriptions that explain the responsibilities
of each job.
Employees in a high-potential organization are known for their creativity and high performance
levels.
Planning Strategies
Strategic planning is considered as the prime success reason by successful companies for what
they have gained with their employees and customers. Strategic human resource management is
extremely necessary for laying the foundations of strategic planning. HRM performs an important
role in retaining top talent and determining the satisfaction of customers through employee
satisfaction surveys and customer interviews respectively.
Strategic Management
Strategic management involves the formulation and implementation of the major goals and
initiatives taken by a company's top management on behalf of owners, based on consideration of
resources and an assessment of the internal and external environments in which the organization
competes. Strategy is defined as "the determination of the basic long-term goals of an enterprise,
and the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resources necessary for carrying out
these goals. Strategies are established to set direction, focus effort, define or clarify the
organization, and provide consistency or guidance in response to the environment.
To begin with, develop a concrete vision for the company. Perhaps you have already established a
company mission statement, or you have a general idea of the direction the company is going. It
is crucial to the development of a human resource strategy to have a clear vision for the
company. Knowing where the company is headed will give guidance to how human resources can
assist the company in reaching its goals. Communicating those goals to the human resource
department will help provide concrete methods that the HR strategy can use. By solidifying the
company’s short and long term goals, the HR strategy can be tailored to best help meet those
goals.
After the company’s vision has been clearly identified and communicated, the next step in
developing an effective HR strategy is to establish the role of the human resources department.
When designing a strategy for the HR department, understanding the specific tasks that HR will
handle is essential.
© 2018 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
Pg.29
Develop a company overview
Once the role of the HR department is clearly outlined, a company evaluation must be completed.
In effect, a total workplace plan will be established, giving a picture of where the company
currently is and providing a means of reaching their business goals while maximizing human
resources. Establishing a strategy that will work must include feedback from people at all levels of
the organization. Discussions with thefinancial department and company executives can
determine the staffing needs of the company and ensure that an adequate number of people are
hired as needed. The HR manager should meet with key employees in all departments to compile
the characteristics of the best employees in each position.
Subsequently, the next step in developing an effective HR strategy is to begin seeking out the
required human resources. This portion of the strategy includes not only hiring a talented
workforce, but determining the methods of attracting that workforce.
• Does placing a classified ad generate the type of skilled labor force you require?
This may require an evaluation of the demographics of the existing labor force. Further, the HR
strategy needs to include the areas that provide the competitive advantage within the job market,
and find ways to maximize that advantage. Identifying weaknesses among the company staff
members as well as providing a framework and timeline for correcting that area is also an
important feature of the HR strategy.
Evaluate HR Processes
Once the HR strategy has been developed, the plan must be implemented. Oftentimes,
companies spend time and money developing plans that are filed in a drawer and never utilized.
By creating a viable HR strategy, businesses can avoid this pitfall and develop a plan that will help
their business improve.
The HR strategy, while a driving force of the company, needs to be flexible to meet the ever changing
needs of the company. Implementing a new strategy can be confusing and tiring. Company executives
may be reluctant to ‘rock the boat’ with new methods of human resource planning. It should be noted,
however, that the leadership of the company sets the tone for how the employees react to new systems.
If the company executives embrace the new plan and demonstrate a willingness to utilize the new HR
strategy, it is more than likely that the rest of the company will follow suit.
Corporate strategy: This strategy is formulated at the top mangier level. This strategy may
be influenced by both internal and external environmental forces.
External environment: Some external forces also affect corporate and business strategies.
Among these forces competition and government regulations play most significant roles.
Business strategy: The next stage of, strategic human resource management after
formulating corporate strategy is business strategy. This strategy is formulated for each
business unit as per its overall objectives.
Human resource strategy: The main function of strategic human resource management is
to formulate a well-conceived HR strategy incorporating HR planning and job design
approaches.
Employee separation: This process is a key strategic issue for the separation, employees
leave the organization smoothly but at this, operations do not suffer or important
professional relationships do not hamper
Staffing: Staffing means acquisition of human resources for the vacant and potential
vacancies of the organization. Efficient employer must be recruited through the effective
staffing program.
Compensation: Another most important and difficult task of SHRM is to make a well-
accepted compensation plan. It the plan made acceptable to the union leaders and
general employees, it may be an excellent job for the SHR manager.
• Labour relations: A good industrial .climate is very important for smooth running of the
organization. Harmonious labour-management relations may help the purpose.
Therefore, SHRM (Strategic Human Resource Management) always try to maintain good labour-
management relations.
• discuss the changing dynamics of the workplace and their impact on new forms of
flexibility
"Flexibility is about an employee and an employer making changes to when, where and how
a person will work to better meet individual and business needs. Flexibility enables both
individual and business needs to be met through making changes to the time (when),
location (where) and manner (how) in which an employee works. Flexibility should be
mutually beneficial to both the employer and employee and result in superior outcomes."
Formal flexibility policies are "officially approved human resources policies, as well as any
official policies that give supervisors discretion to provide flexibility."
Informal flexibility refers to "policies that are not official and not written down but are still
available to some employees, even on a discretionary basis."
While most formal work arrangements can usually be identified, organizations acknowledge
that utilization statistics probably underestimate the true reach and impact of flexibility,
as they cannot accurately determine the extent of informal flexibility—for example,
employees who occasionally alter their work hours or work from home.
The various ways in which work is programmed in an organisation is also highly affected by
flexibility. Changes are constantly taking place in organisations; therefore it is also
essential for change to take place in the way work is completed. Workplace flexibility is
defines as "the ability of workers to make choices influencing when, where, and for how
long they engage in work related tasks" (Hill et al. 2008:152).
Flexibility is an approach used to define how and when work is carried out and how careers
are organised and structured. It is a critical factor to overall workplace effectiveness (Hill
et al. 2008). Firms make use of it as a means for improving recruitment and retention, for
managing workload, and for responding to employee diversity (Hill et al. 2008). .
Not only does workplace flexibility attract suitable candidates but employers also have the
responsibility of doing everything in their power to make the workplace as pleasant as
possible for the employees.
Employers must therefore look after their employee's interests and create opportunities for
them to grow and develop (Nieman & Bennett 2006:251). Working in a company where
the activities and working hours are flexible and where employees manage to find ways in
balancing work and personal life is beneficial to all (Nieman & Bennett 2006). Therefore,
employees in such companies are most likely to be settled in their positions and duties;
have a higher chance of increased work performance and improving retention in the
company (Nieman & Bennett 2006)).
Another major key factor in a business' success is the investment in technology and
software that makes it even easier for any business to adapt to being flexible (Nieman &
Bennett 2006). Technological advancement has been very influential in the running of
businesses, it has made the carrying out of tasks/activities/administration and financial
work more efficient and effective and less time consuming with easier access to the
internet.
o Flexible working time: In this pattern the employees total working hours are at
different times during a day, e.g. the employee decides when he/she should pitch
for work in the mornings, or leave in the afternoon. As long as the employee
works for the amount of time stated in the contract.
o Flexible career: This pattern involves an employee taking leave in their career, or
taking an absence from the company, but still remains an employee at the
particular company, e.g. worker who take a break from work without pay for
personal reasons, but carry on the same employment when they return.
o Flexible Place: In this pattern employees are permitted to work in other places
other than their offices, depending on the job task.
‘‘The changing dynamics of flexibility’’ describes four role players involved in the new flexible
environment, namely the flexible core worker, the flexible organization, flexible work systems and
flexible managers. The new generation of core workers will experience fundamental changes to
the nature of their employment relationship and they will need an organizational structure to
reflect this. The new flexible worker will also need managers that can apply new practices and
shed old habits. To make certain that the organization develops sustained competitive advantage
through their human resources, it will have to continue investing resources in these employees.
Telecommuting or working remotely. With this type of flexible working arrangement, the
employer does not dictate where the employee is located to do the work. Obviously this
requires the type of job that can be done from anywhere (usually with the assistance of
technology like VPNs to access the employer’s systems, video conferencing to join meetings,
and mobile devices for portability). A remote working option could be implemented full-
time, or it could be implemented for a specified number of days per week. Either way, the
employees get the benefit of reduced commuting costs and have the flexibility of working
from wherever they may be that day.
Adjusted work hours. This type of flexibility involves allowing employees to alter their work
hours (usually within specified options) to better suit their needs. For example, an employer
may allow employees to start their 8-hour workday any time between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m. to
accommodate those who have other activities that need to be accomplished in the morning.
Or they may allow employees to take time out during the workday to attend to personal
needs without penalty, as long as they complete the requisite number of agreed-upon
hours for the day or week. Or the employer may have multiple set schedule options
(typically done to ensure coverage during specific times), but still allow employees to choose
which of the schedule options best fits their needs. Yet another option for employers is to
allow the work to be done at any time that suits the employee, as long as all of the work
gets done in a timely manner.
Part-time work. Part-time work can be a benefit for individuals who would prefer to work
fewer total hours in a workweek. This is especially true if an employer opts to offer part-
time employees some or all of the benefits that are available to full-time employees (as loss
of benefits is one big reason that a lot of people do not look for part-time work, even if they
could otherwise benefit from fewer hours.)
Job sharing. Though perhaps less common than some of the other options on this list, job
sharing is another avenue to allow some flexibility for employee schedules. As the name
implies, this is where a single full-time job is shared between two or more employees. The
details can be worked out on an individual basis, but each person only works a portion of
the workweek. In practice, this results in a similar situation to having a part-time job, but
there are additional benefits for the employer in some cases, such as the ability to have
built-in coverage for when one of the individuals is away from work. Administration and
fairness to each employee can be more difficult to manage, however, since both employees
must be responsible for the same workload.
Vacation time flexibility - Headlines keep popping up reminding us that more organizations
are trying the idea of unlimited vacation time. This type of arrangement usually is set up
with specific requirements that must be met before vacation can be taken - such as being
caught up on work or having a continuation plan in place for ongoing work. Usually the
organization will need to have a culture that rewards employees for doing their job well,
regardless of how many hours the individual is at the workplace.
© 2018 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
Pg.36
There are benefits for both employers and employees when using flexible working arrangements. For
example, with staggered work start times, the employer may benefit from having employees working for
a longer part of the day, thus being available for customers for longer. Employers may also benefit from
improved job satisfaction of employees, less burnout, and reduced turnover that may result.
How to Make Flexible Work Arrangements a Success for Your Business: Problems
and Solutions
Employers can help ensure that both they and their workers reap the benefits of flexible work
arrangements by being aware of some of the most common problems associated with these
plans and how to avoid them:
One of the most common mistakes that companies make when establishing flex plans is
insufficient communication with workers.
Solution: Seek input from employees on their interest and needs as you develop a flexible work
program. Assess whether or not the new work arrangement is appropriate for their type of work.
Will workers be able to continue to function effectively? The best arrangement is one that
addresses employees’ personal needs or wants and at the same time addresses the company’s
needs to provide high quality products and services.
Problem #2. Failure to identify that Certain Positions/Individuals are not Conducive to Flexible
Work arrangements
Solution: Do your homework. Will the arrangement cause difficulties in ensuring office coverage?
Will it cause customer complaints about availability? Do the benefits outweigh the costs? Is there
any employee interest in the plan? Will it cause a problem in scheduling meetings?
An individual’s work style and history should also support the demands of the arrangement; i.e.,
Employees who have shown an inability to work well independently would not be ideal candidates for
telecommuting arrangements, and employees without the needed physical and emotional stamina
would not be able to sustain the long hours needed for compressed work schedules.
Inconsistent application of informal policies can cause resentment, poor morale, loss of
employees and even legal action.
Solution: Develop and prepare a formal written policy on company flexible work plans that is
detailed, clearly-stated and non-discriminatory.
Work arrangements such as telecommuting can result in a lack of business and social contact
with co-workers and supervisors.
Solution: Conduct staff meetings that include flex staff so that they are not excluded from
information sharing or alienated from co-workers and managers. Telecommuters’ contact with
other employees should not be limited to email; efforts should be made to include telephone
contact, especially with supervisors.
Managers are not always eager to relinquish direct supervision of staff “on-site” where they can
visually evaluate the work process of employees.
Solution: Managers may need to be educated in order to change their mind-set. They will need to
learn to manage in a system based on trust and respect, where it primarily the results, rather
than the work process, that is evaluated. Most output can be measured wherever a person may
be located.
Problem #6. Failure to Monitor, Assess and Update Flexible Work Arrangements
Solution: After a flex program has been initiated, take the time to assess its success in meeting
goals, and make any necessary adjustments. Keep the lines of communication open with
employees in terms of encouraging and listening to feedback. When initiating a new plan, pilot
programs with a limited time frame can be useful. At the onset, advise employees that – if the
plan proves unsuccessful – a return to prior traditional work arrangements may result.
Lawsuits have been charged against businesses in recent years with a number of flex time
abuses. Most flex time litigation has to do with the misclassification of workers as being exempt
from overtime. There is also the danger of a worker being injured at home while performing
company business, which may also result in litigation.
Solution: Employers must precisely determine which employees are exempt or non-exempt. Non-
exempt employees are entitled to overtime pay for hours worked in addition to 40-hours in any
given work-week. These employees must be required to document and submit hours worked.
Employers need to communicate with home workers that they are required to work in a healthy
and safe home office environment. Advise home workers that they need to report any work-
related injuries to you within 24 hours of occurrence. If an employee reports getting injured at
home, be sure to get a detailed account of the particular work activities performed at the time of
injury.
Although implementing a flexible work program may take time and planning, the benefits can be
well worth the effort for small business. Among the benefits: increased job satisfaction, lower
absenteeism and increased loyalty to the employer.
© 2018 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
Pg.38
The Atkinson flexible firm model
Researchers have also given huge emphasis on models of flexibility. The most common one is the
Atkinson's flexible firm model. Many of the forms of flexibility illustrated above in Table 1 can be
identified with the flexible firm model developed by John Atkinson in 1984. Atkinson's model is
important in combining the different forms and dimensions of flexibility, as well as contributing to
developing a structure for understanding workplace flexibility (Atkinson 1984).
The flexible firm model is a mixture of functional, numerical and financial flexibility by working
with a workforce that consists of core and peripheral workers, as well as a number of other
'outside' workers who are not a part of the organisation but provide their basic or essential
services (Reilly 2001).
Atkinson identifies functional, numerical and financial flexibility as the major types of flexibilities
that succeeding companies should seek for (Atkinson, 1984). Functional flexibility has to do with
the ability of employees to cope with different tasks and moves between jobs, e.g. multi-skilling
(Dilworth 1996). This approach enables employers to match changing workloads, production
methods and technology. Numerical flexibility involves having the power to change the number of
employees or the number of hours that each employee has worked, in reaction to the changes in
demand (Dilworth 1996). Financial flexibility involves a company's ability to adjust employment
costs in response to supply and demand in the external labour market. The objectives of
functional and numerical flexibility are made easier thanks to financial flexibility (Dilworth 1996).
Also, it involves a move away from standardised pay structures. It is directed towards more
individualised systems dependent upon performance.
Furthermore, Atkinson had proposed an ideal model of the fully flexible organization (Atkinson
1984). An organization of such kind would hire numerically permanent core group of workers. The
core group would include full-time workers who would execute out the key activities and duties in
the company (Atkinson 1984). Neighboring the core employees are the peripheral groups. There
are two types of peripheral groups. The first type of peripheral groups consists of workers that
have permanent contracts, but have fewer career opportunities and less employment security.
The second type of peripheral groups consists of part-time employees, job sharers, or workers
that are on short-term contracts (Atkinson 1984).
Although both core and peripheral workers form part of an organization, they are somehow both
distinguished and treated differently. Bryson (1999) has argued that the core employees are more
exposed to training and development, and benefit more through their involvement and
participation in the various group tasks and activities done in the workplace. The peripheral
employees however, seem to have fewer benefits offered in the job, making this an unfair
treatment (Bryson 1999). During a country's recession period, the peripheral workers are the
ones at higher risk of being retrenched or dismissed from the workplace, because the majority of
them have short-term contracts and less opportunities whereas the core employees have a more
secure position based on their full-time contracts in the company, states Bryson (1999). So how
can organizations use the flexible firm model for better organizational structure? Interesting
enough, what is also highly emphasized about the Atkinson's model is that the flexible firm model
itself is not exactly the way for structuring all organizations; it is just a model that can help
somehow. Organizations can therefore use other means of organizational structure that have
been more highly effective in the past.
© 2018 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
Pg.39
The link between the core and periphery sectors is more complicated than it is generally assumed
by the core-periphery model (Kallenberg 2001). It is often assumed that employees in the
periphery are utilized to protect the core group, but this is not the case. Furthermore, both the
core and periphery groups may be linked in most ways than others, especially when it comes to
recruitment and selection of temporary agency staff for fixed or full-time positions (Kallenberg
2001).
In addition, whether or not the flexible firm model identifies both the core and periphery labour
force as a separate employment category is questionable. Some writers have found that the
hiring of temporary workers is more likely to happen where demand is predictable.
Also, overtime is the ideal method or way to acquire temporary flexibility where demand is
unpredictable. Thus, standard workers are not being substituted by temporary workers (Pollert
1988; Legge, 1995; Buultjens and Luckie, 1997). It is highly ironic how recent evidence has
suggested that some managers and trade unionists view part-time employees as marginal,
because surprisingly, temporaryemployees and part-time employees are also each treated as
separate labour force segments (Pollert, 1988; Legge, 1995; Buultjens and Luckie, 1997).
Studies have illustrated that temporary work is often shown to be a screening procedure used to
hire permanent staff instead of a strategy to increase a periphery. On top of that, there is also
evidence that the main reason for utilizing self-employed workers is for specialist skills which are
unavailable in the core work force. It is not to provide numerical flexibility (Pollert, 1988; Legge,
1995; Buultjens and Luckie, 1997).
In summary, experiential research continuously comes to the conclusion that the flexible firm
model itself is not enough to explain the changes that have constantly taken place and been
observed in organisations (Proctor et al. 1994). Researches who have argued against the
Atkinson's model, argued seem to agree that in a majority of cases, the theoretical contrast made
between core and peripheral workers basically seems to be unproven (Proctor et al. 1994).
The pathway to future success for most organisations is having a flexible workplace. However, is
having a flexible working environment more of an advantage than a disadvantage, especially in
today's business world and due to the constant development of advanced technology? Exactly
how can both employers and employees benefit from having a flexible workplace? According to
Dickens (2005), the benefits/advantages for the employees include:
A flexible workplace environment shows that the needs of the workers are taken into
consideration, and this in turn increases their loyalty, trust and respect towards their
employers.
Dickens (2005) states that for the employer, the benefits include the following:
Minimizes absence and turnover: A flexible workplace decreases the stress level of
employees, stress that is often caused by trying to meet their job and family commitments
at the same time. Flexibility enables them to develop a greater sense of well-being, and
look forward to going to work each day.
With workplace flexibility, organisational resources are matched more closely with
customer/product demand.
A flexible workplace attracts highly qualified expertise that become keen to share their
experience and knowledge in the company.
A flexible workplace results to greater profits and a higher market share, due to the hard
work and dedication of its employees.
Employers get to save in recruitment costs, and minimize the fixed labour costs, such as
office space, fuel, etc.
Of course, to every advantage, there is always a disadvantage. The major disadvantages of flexible
patterns are the following (Stredwick & Ellis 2005):
Often, there is a need of a specialized management team for the flexible workforce in
organizations.
Workplace flexibility often creates tension amongst the diverse categories of workers due
to uneven treatment in terms of pay.
Workplace flexibility increases job insecurity, especially for the part-time workers.
• list the five key areas to make talent a source of competitive advantage
In the previous study units you learnt more about the changing nature of the employment
relationship which has contributed to an increasing recognition of the individual employee as the
primary source of competitiveness. As a result of this focus on the employee, the HR function has
an increasingly critical role to play in the development of systems and practices to attract, retain
and develop these key human resources. Increasing shortages of skills created major changes in
the labour market. If organisations are to remain competitive, the management of talented
employees will be a key focus.
Talent management is just another one of those pesky Human Resources terms. Right? Wrong.
Talent management is an organization's commitment to recruit, retain, and develop the most
talented and superior employees available in the job market.
So, talent management is a useful term when it describes an organization's commitment to hire,
manage, develop, and retain talented employees. It comprises all of the work processes and
systems that are related to retaining and developing a superior workforce.
Talent management is a business strategy that organizations hope will enable them to retain their
top talented employees. Just like employee involvement or employee recognition, it is the stated
business strategy that will ensure the attraction of top talent in competition with other employers.
When you tell a prospective employee that you are dedicated to a talent management strategy
that will ensure that he or she will have the opportunity to develop professionally, you attract the
best talent.
Human Capital Theory refers to the aggregate stock of competencies, knowledge, social, and
personal attributes embodied in the ability to create intrinsic and measurable economic value.
Human Capital Theory views humans and individuals as economic units acting as their own
economy. The role of human capital is widely discussed in economic development, productivity
analysis, innovation, public policy, and education.
The basic concept of Human Capital Theory is that investments in individuals can be
mathematically measured based on the economic value they are able to contribute to
society.
Human capital is often subdivided into categories such as cultural capital, social capital,
economic capital, and symbolic capital. Human capital is developed in many ways.
Economic capital is typically measured by the ability to perform labor which results in
economic value. Education, job training, and marketable talents are all ways in which
humans increase their ability to acquire knowledge and generate higher wages.
Social capital and cultural capital refer to the relationships and influence individuals
contribute to society. Although social, cultural, and symbolic capital are very difficult to
measure, understanding their existence and value is still vital. Each type of human capital
is important and the combination of all types generate total human capital.
The assumptions of human capital theory revolve around the immeasurable nature of its
many forms. Economic capital can be measured by its ability to produce wages, however,
an intrinsic value of human capital exists although it is not always measurable. Secondly,
human capital may be stored but not fully utilized at all times therefore making it difficult
to observe and study consistently.
Human capital theory is relatively consistent across different disciplines; the different types of
human capital are more relevant depending on the primary subject matter. Measuring economic
human capital and its return on investment is a vital aspect of the proposed theory. The
measurement of human capital is done in many ways and new metrics are being developed to
measure traditionally difficult fields such as social capital (Klout score).
Human capital theory has practical implication for determining the value of training and
education. It allows individuals to calculate the expected future returns of an investment in
education. In addition, human capital theory’s utility allows individuals to quantify the value of
their intangible assets such as education and social status.
The theory of human capital has both planning utility and measurement utility. Consumer
economics and financial planning often measures the value of current choices versus their long
run returns and implications. Human Capital Theory allows individuals to make decisions about
the inherent cost of future opportunities weighted with the opportunity cost of present situations.
Human capital theory also introduces the investment risks of human capital theory including its
illiquidity and assumptions about payback periods and opportunity cost. Again, human capital
theory can be applied to the lives of graduate students when looking at time allocation and the
investments in health and social capital. Investments in both physical health and mental health
are both necessary to maximizing overall human capital. Finally, measuring the intrinsic value of a
PhD allows graduate students to continue their course of action even if the economic returns and
opportunity cost produce a negative monetary return.
Resource-Based Theory
Influenced by Porter's [1980, 1985] studies in the 1980s, strategic management explains a firm's
success regarding industrial sector features. From this point of view, firms in the same industrial
sector having the same opportunities with few, if any, differences between them, remain that way
only for a short period of time [Cuervo, "Universidad Complutense de Madrid--Spain. 84 FOSSAS
OLALLA: HUMAN RESOURCES 85 1993].
Nevertheless, it is observed that an enterprise from the same industrial sector can be profitably
different for a long time. How is this explained? Not only do external factors determine the firm's
success and profitability but internal factors also play an important role. This idea is the origin of
the resource-based theory. This new perspective considers that each enterprise is
heterogeneous, having different established resources which arise from its own past history.
Heterogeneous character can be maintained for a long time, thereby, having long-term income
[Fern~adez and Sufirez, 1996].
To the extent that these firm-specific resources and capabilities yield economic benefits that cannot be
perfectly duplicated through competitors' actions, they may bepotent sources of sustained competitive
advantage." Along general lines of this theory, two key concepts are resource and capability. Wernerfelt
[1984] says:
"By a resource is meant anything which could be thought of as a strength or a weakness of a given
firm. More formally, a firm's resources at a given time could be defined as those (tangible and
intangible) assets which are tied semi permanently to the firm. Examples of resources are: brand
names, in-house knowledge of technology, employment of skilled personnel, trade contracts,
machinery, efficient procedures, capital..... "
What appears to differentiate talent management focused practitioners and organizations from
organizations that use terminologies such as human capital management or performance
management, is their focus on the manager's role, as opposed to reliance on Human Resources,
for the life cycle of an employee within an organization.
Practitioners of the other two employee development and retention strategies would argue that,
for example, performance management has the same set of best practices.
Talent management does give managers a significant role and responsibility in the recruitment
process and in the ongoing development of and retention of superior employees. In some
organizations, only top potential employees are included in the talent management system.
You can include the following systems when you approach talent management as your overall
business strategy to recruit and retain talented employees:
Job post writing and recruiting location placement for the posting;
In-house interviews that can involve multiple meetings with many of your current
employees;
On-the-job training;
As stated, the majority of these work systems are squarely in the hands of the employee's
manager. HR can provide support, training, and backup but the day-to-day interactions that
ensure the new employee's success come from the manager.
Developing and coaching the employee come from his or her active, daily interaction with the
manager.
HR can take the lead in some of the activities you see on this list, especially in recruiting and
selecting new employees, and in the case of an employment termination. HR is also deeply
involved in the performance management system, career planning, and so forth leading the
development of the systems.
But, managers are the means to carry them out for the overall recognition of the employee's work
and ongoing retention of the employee. Take the responsibility seriously
Talent management is a business strategy and you must fully integrate it within all of the
employee related processes of the organization. Attracting and retaining talented
employees, in a talent management system, is the job of every member of the
organization, but especially managers who have reporting staff (talent).
An effective strategy also involves the sharing of information about talented employees
and their potential career paths across the organization. This enables various
departments to identify available talent when opportunities are made or arise.
An organization that does this kind of effective succession planning makes sure that the
best talent you have is trained and ready to assume the next position in their career path.
Succession planning benefits the employees and it benefits the organization. Managers
across the organization are in touch with the employees you are grooming for their next
big role.
Talent management differs from previous HR processes for hiring, training, and retaining
employees—and indeed from HR itself—in several key ways:
Where hiring, training, and retention before were centralized in the HR department, with
talent management many of these duties are federated to thefront-line managers actually
leading the employees in question. In this way the whole organization is responsible for,
and has a stake in these activities.
Recruitment
Before HR managers can cultivate talent, they have to get high-quality candidates in the
door. Recruitment software can aid the talent acquisition process by helping HR
managers to research, source, communicate with and continuously engage potential job
candidates.
Learning
Learning management systems have long been used to administer courses and other
formal training programs. However, experts say that corporate learning is now branching
out beyond rigid course delivery to a more informal and integrated experience
Most organizations have historically adhered to an annual formal review process, where
an employee sits down with his manager to discuss strengths, goals and areas for
improvement. But today, HR managers are realizing that the performance management
process itself needs improvement.
In recent years, many companies have ditched the annual assessment-based review in
favor of a more frequent, coaching-oriented model. Another significant trend in the
performance management space is to involve more people in the review process, to
supposedly get a more accurate picture of an employee.
Compensation
Definitions of ‘talent’ vary across the globe. Are you talking about all employees or a selected
subset such as executives and senior leaders, high performers, maybe graduate in-take and fast-
track members? Or in some cases, a new concept, critical talent roles? Start by clarifying who you
mean by talent and how you will identify them.
Historically, talent related functions such as recruitment, learning & development and
performance and succession have been siloed in the way they work. That has made linking
internal and external talent sourcing initiatives harder than it should be.
There is a strong business case for sourcing candidates internally, according to the Saratoga
Institute, which estimates hiring externally costs on average 1.7 times as much more than filling
positions internally.
Learning and development is one of the central elements of the employee value proposition (for
attracting and retaining key talent) as well as being the central pillar of talent development. So,
make L&D the engine room of talent management. Whether you want to on-board new team
members faster, raise current business productivity and performance, fill current skills gaps or
develop strategic capabilities for the future – learning is key.
There is not much point in being great at talent acquisition or talent development, if you are not
great at talent retention. Retaining key talent is one of the clearest returns on investment you can
show related to your people, but money is only one of the factors at play here. For example, staff
leaving can negatively impact your current performance, as well as reduce your current skilled
capacity for work.
To retain your best people, you have to know who they are and to know why they might leave.
Implicit to raising standards in talent sourcing, management and retention is having good data on
the people concerned and their performance in the business, and being able to use it within the
context of the business.
But reporting from talent and HR systems is notoriously poor – especially for the business itself.
Improving this requires both an improvement in the accuracy of the data itself as well as better ways of
presenting it. That doesn’t just mean in the HR and talent systems, it also means being able to
contextually embed talent related data within work systems and vice versa. For example, being able to
embed performance support and learning around sales and customer service processes.
• list the three different scorecards available for measuring a company’s performance
• identify the components of the balanced scorecard, the HR scorecard and the workforce
scorecard
The balanced scorecard was first introduced by accounting academic Dr. Robert Kaplan and
business executive and theorist Dr. David Norton. It was first published in 1992 in a Harvard
Business Review article. Dr. Kaplan and Dr. Norton took previous metric performance measures
and adapted them to include nonfinancial information.
Kaplan and Norton describe the innovation of the balanced scorecard as follows:
"The balanced scorecard retains traditional financial measures. But financial measures tell the
story of past events, an adequate story for industrial age companies for which investments in
long-term capabilities and customer relationships were not critical for success. These financial
measures are inadequate, however, for guiding and evaluating the journey that information age
companies must make to create future value through investment in customers, suppliers,
employees, processes, technology, and innovation."
The balanced scorecard is used to attain objectives, measurements, initiatives and goals
that result from these four primary functions of a business. Companies can easily identify
factors hindering company performance and outline strategic changes tracked by future
scorecards.
With the balanced scorecard, they look at the company as a whole when viewing company
objectives. An organization may use the balanced scorecard to implement strategy
mapping to see where value is added within an organization. A company also utilizes the
balanced scorecard to develop strategic initiatives and strategy objectives.
First, learning and growth are analysed through the investigation of trainingand knowledge
resources. This first leg handles how well information is captured and how effectively employees
utilize the information to convert it to a competitive advantage over the industry.
Second, business processes are evaluated by investigating how well products are
manufactured. Operational management is analysed to track any gaps, delays,
bottlenecks, shortages or waste.
Third, customer perspectives are collected to gauge customer satisfaction with quality,
price and availability of products or services. Customers provide feedback regarding if
their needs are being met with current products.
Finally, financial data such as sales, expenditures and income are used to understand
financial performance. These financial metrics may include dollar amounts, financial
ratios, budget variances or income targets. These four legs encompass the vision and
strategy of an organization and require active management to analyze the data collected.
Therefore, the balanced scorecard is often referred to as a management tool, not a
measurement tool.
The HR scorecard is a method for Human Resources to position itself as a strategic planning
partner with line managers and executives within an organization. A detailed and excellent book
on this topic is The HR Scorecard, by Becker, Huselid, and Ulrich. This book is available on either
Amazon.com or the Society for Human Resource Management‘s web site.
The premise for an HR scorecard is that HR can and should develop metrics to demonstrate how
HR activities impact profitability. The process we recommend is:
Define HR activities that provide the critical deliverables (such as high-talent staffing or a
retention initiative).
Lastly, it’s important to ask the right questions to determine if HR is providing the appropriate
deliverables. Examples of these questions are:
How many exceptional candidates do we recruit and retain for each strategic job opening?
The Workforce Scorecard argues that to maximize the strategic contribution of the workforce,
organizations must meet three challenges: view their workforce in terms of its potential
contribution rather than as a cost to be minimized (the perspective challenge); replace
benchmarking metrics with measures that differentiate levels of strategic impact (the metrics
challenge); and hold line managers and HR professionals jointly responsible for workforce quality
and strategy execution (the execution challenge).
To make this happen, our main thesis in The Workforce Scorecard is that managers and leaders
need a strategy for the business, a strategy for the workforce, and a strategy for the HR function.
As a result, they also need a series of metrics and measures for each; a balanced scorecard, a
workforce scorecard, and an HR scorecard, respectively.
Designing such a system begins with a clear understanding of the unique processes through
which the workforce creates value in each business. The Workforce Scorecard offers a framework
that identifies and measures the outcomes, behaviours, competencies, mind-set, and culture
required for workforce success and reveals how each dimension impacts the bottom line. The
lynchpin of this perspective is an emphasis on looking at the role of human capital from the
“outside in” (or customer back), not from the “inside out” (starting with the HR function).
The first element is Workforce Success. Here the key question is: Has the workforce
accomplished the key strategic objectives for the business?
The second element is Leadership and Workforce Behaviours. Are the leadership team
and workforce consistently behaving in a way that will lead to achieving our key strategic
objectives? Have we identified and nurtured “A” Players in “A” Positions?
The third element is Workforce Competencies. Does the workforce, especially in the key
or “A” positions, have the skills it needs to execute strategy?
Finally, the fourth element is Workforce Mind-set and Culture. Does the workforce
understand the strategy, embrace it, and do we have the culture we need to support
strategy execution?
• identify and discuss issues that arise in the employment relationship from the
• discuss the role of HR professionals in the management of corporate ethics programs and
the benefits of such programs from an organizational perspective
• apply critical thinking skills and ethical imagination to resolve dilemmas and enhance
decision-making in the practice of HRM
The word ‘‘ethics’’, in the organizational context, deals with moral judgment, standards of conduct
and a shared value system that serves to guide, channel, shape and direct the behaviour of
individuals in the organization in a productive direction.
In South African-based enterprises business ethics have two important anchors, namely the
Constitution’s founding values and the King reports on corporate governance. Ethics also then
apply to HRM. Let us now take a look at the ethical dimensions of strategic HRM.
As long as HR professionals are concerned with both the management of systems and the
management of people, it is difficult to see how they could give up any one of these
values.
Operationalising the proper balance between conflicting values remains complex and
goes to the heart of strategically managing human resources with integrity.
SHRM & AHRI by-passed the issue of dual loyalties - now refer to standards and values
(advancing the profession, honesty, integrity, confidentiality, justice, competence,
lawfulness and organisational capability)
o Dual loyalty
o Hold in tension the plurality of values it has inherited from multiple traditions (not
only including HRM paradigms, but also South Africa’s constitution)
o Important vehicle for providing direction and counsel to the hr profession in South
Africa.
Business ethics - law specifies an ethical minimum and that ethics involves more than
minimal legal compliance
Strategic HRM paradigm calls for HR professionals to move beyond the roles of “policy
police and regulatory watchdog”, to business partner
Combined concern for the competitive use of human capital with managerial
responsibility for the ethical dimensions of an enterprise’s strategic operations
Utilitarianism (Consequentialism)
(Teleological theory)
Utilitarianism: The Utilitarianism theory holds that an action is good if it results in maximum
satisfaction for a large number of people who are likely to get affected by the action. Suppose a
manager creates an annual employee vacation schedule after soliciting the vacation time
preferences from all the employees and honor their preferences, then he would be acting in a
way that shall maximize the pleasure of all the employees.
Teleological Ethical Theories are concerned with the consequences of actions which means the
basic standards for our actions being morally right or wrong depends on the good or evil
generated.
Utilitarianism – the right thing to do is that which maximizes the greatest good for the
greatest number of people
act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism - deciding right and wrong on the basis of the
consequences of an action
o The difference is between whether a utility analysis should be applied to every action
whenever it occurs (act utilitarianism) or to classes of actions (rule utilitarianism), an
example being by breaking a contract.
o Egoism - the right action is that which maximizes self-interest
o Ubunthu - principle of reciprocity and interdependence. Mbiti translates the term as “I am,
because we are; and since we are, therefore I am”.
(Deontological theory)
The term “deontology” comes from the Greek word deon, meaning duty. The theory of
deontology states we are morally obligated to act in accordance with a certain set of principles
and rules regardless of outcome. In religious deontology, the principles derive from divine
commandment so that under religious laws, we are morally obligated not to steal, lie, or cheat.
Thus, deontological theories and duties have existed for many centuries. Immanuel Kant, the
theory’s celebrated proponent, formulated the most influential form of a secular deontological
moral theory in 1788. Unlike religious deontological theories, the rules (or maxims) in Kant’s
deontological theory derive from human reason.
Deontological theories differ from utilitarian theories in several key ways. The most notable
difference is utilitarianism aims at a goal of greatest happiness (or the best consequence) and
justifies any act that achieves that goal. Deontological theories hold that some acts are always
wrong, even if the act leads to an admirable outcome. Actions in deontology are always judged
independently of their outcome. An act can be morally bad but may unintentionally lead to a
favourable outcome.
o distributive
o procedural
o retributive
To claim a right is to claim that one is ethically entitled to something and this places a duty on
other people to act (or refrain from acting) in a way which brings about the fulfilment of one’s
right
positive rights are claim or welfare rights (e.g. the right to employment at a living wage)
most specific rights are derived from the 3 major Lockean rights of life, liberty and
property
criticism – opens the way for people to claim a right to ‘anything and everything’
Discussion of ethical theory generates four key questions that HR managers can usefully employ
to evaluate prospective responses to ethical challenges and dilemmas they may face. These
questions are as follows:
Who is affected and how? Which action will result in the greatest good for the greatest
number of people affected by it? (utilitarianism)
Is the action one that universally respects autonomous rational beings as ends in
themselves? (Kantian deontology)
Is the action one that treats all stakeholders fairly? (justice) Is the action one that upholds
fundamental human rights?
selection
screening
employment interview
psychological testing
compensation
• explain and discuss the shareholder and stakeholder models of corporate responsibility
(CR) and how the two models reflect different theories of the corporation
• discuss the implications of ethics governance and the governance of ethics for the HR
function
Corporations are living entities made up of multiple stakeholders and can therefore never be
static entities. Businesses never operate in a vacuum and are always part of a smaller or bigger
society. Because corporations are the conduits of society, they have the responsibility to harness
human, monetary, environmental and social capital in the best interest of the planet. This implies
that business enterprises can no longer only focus on the profit-taking interests of their
shareholders, but also have to take into account the diverse needs of individuals and groups in
the societies where they operate.
Obviously, the approaches regarding corporate ethics differ considerably in the different
countries around the world, not to mention in the different types oforganizations that are to be
found. Because of this, organizations, academics and governments in the various countries use
different terms when they refer to issues related to corporate ethics. Whatever term is used, the
landscape is vast. It is therefore useful to distinguish the key domains both theory and practice
attribute to them.
Corporate Social Responsibility is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and
contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their
families as well as of the local community and society at large
Corporate Social Responsibility (also known as CSR, corporate conscience, and corporate
citizenship) is the integration of socially beneficial programs and practices into a corporation's
business model and culture. CSR aims to increase long-term profits for online and offline
businesses by enabling them to become more efficient and attract positive attention for their
efforts.
Both ecommerce and brick-and-mortar businesses stand to benefit from the implementation of
CSR strategies. Some activities that fall under the umbrella of CSR, with their corresponding
benefits, include:
Prevent financial ramifications: Compliance with the spirit and letter of the law -
both nationally and internationally - through self-regulatory processes will prevent fines,
put your business "low on regulators' radar screens," and lower legal expenses.
Increase employee loyalty: Treating your employees fairly and generously is a part of
corporate social responsibility. By providing good jobs and encouraging high professional
and moral standards, you increase employee loyalty, and by procuring only those
overseas products produced at factories where workers were treated ethically, you gain
support among "Fair Trade" advocates.
Social Concern: Donating to humanitarian causes that fight persistent poverty, help the
victims of epidemics like AIDS or Ebola, or assist those displaced by hurricanes or
earthquakes shows concern for issues that consumers are more and more aware of in
our modern, interconnected world.
Online businesses can utilize and incorporate the above methods, but there are additional digital
opportunities to give back:
Helping the environment through "website sustainability," meaning lowering the carbon
footprint of webpages by removing screen clutter, replacing video clips with slide shows
and improving ease of navigation.
Allowing clients to choose a charity that receives a portion of profits. Many customers
appreciate their input being taken into account and are more likely to return when they
feel personally connected to the beneficiary of a charitable campaign.
Promoting additional social/humanitarian causes with display ads on the website, blog
content, and social media posts.
Recognizing how important social responsibility is to their customers, many companies now focus
on and practice a few broad categories of corporate social responsibility (CSR).
"European companies have really led the way on environment efforts, such as green energy
usage, eco-friendly office and travel policies, and ensuring that businesses take a responsibility
for controlling if their net impact is positive or negative," said Richard Stevenson, head of
corporate communications at ecommerce platform ePages.com.
2. Philanthropy: Businesses also practice social responsibility by donating to national and local
charities. Businesses have a lot of resources that can benefit charities and local community
programs.
3. Ethical labor practices: By treating employees fairly and ethically, companies can also
demonstrate their corporate social responsibility. This is especially true of businesses that
operate in international locations with labor laws that differ from those in the United States.
4. Volunteering: Attending volunteer events says a lot about a company's sincerity. By doing good
deeds without expecting anything in return, companies are able to express their concern for
specific issues and support for certain organizations.
"Ethical labor and volunteering are no-brainers – consumers and partners want to hear that a
business is building something more than just revenues. Even modest steps such as 'open door
days' can be a great way to build links to your community and reflect that you aim to make
valuable, long term impact," Stevenson added.
All stakeholders in a business seek to understand and value the mission of the company,
and why they should invest and support in it and that, according to Stevenson, is why CSR
matters.
"In recent history, the organizations that have achieved remarkable things tend to be the
ones that share success with others, instinctively," he said.
"Sustainability isn't just important for people and the planet, but also is vital for business
success," said Maw, whose company connects students and professionals who want to
use their business skills to do social good. "Communities are grappling with problems that
are global in scope and structurally multifaceted – Ebola, persistent poverty, climate
change. The business case for engaging in corporate social responsibility is clear and
unmistakable."
Consumers aren't the only ones who are drawn to businesses that give back. Susan
Cooney, head of marketing & partnerships, diversity inclusion at Change Catalyst, said
that a company's CSR strategy is a big factor in where today's top talent chooses to work.
"The next generation of employees is seeking out employers that are focused on the triple
bottom line: people, planet and revenue," Cooney told Business News Daily. "Coming out
of the recession, corporate revenue has been getting stronger. Companies are
encouraged to put that increased profit into programs that give back."
While many companies now practice some form of social responsibility, some are making it a core
of their operations. Ben and Jerry's, for instance, uses only fair trade ingredients and had
developed a sustainability program for dairy farms in its home state of Vermont. Starbucks has
created its C.A.F.E. Practice guidelines, which are designed to ensure the company sources
sustainably grown and process coffee by evaluating the economic, social and environmental
aspects of coffee production.
However, Stevens said that companies need to understand what their core social purpose is a
how that aligns with their stated mission, to create a cohesive CSR strategy i.e. Practicing what you
preach.
Undertaking socially responsible initiatives is truly a win-win situation. Not only will your company
appeal to socially conscious consumers and employees, but you'll also make a real difference in
the world. Keep in mind that in CSR, transparency and honesty about what you're doing are
paramount to earning the public's trust, Cooney said.
Stevens reminded business owners that the corporate world has more power than many realize,
and using that power to improve the world can bring people of all backgrounds, ages and
interests together.
"Given their power and sheer size, corporations can solve big social problems and have a huge
impact," she said.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The framework of rules and practices by which a board of directors ensures accountability,
fairness, and transparency in a company's relationship with its all stakeholders (financiers,
customers, management, employees, government, and the community).
The corporate governance framework consists of (1) explicit and implicit contracts between the
company and the stakeholders for distribution of responsibilities, rights, and rewards, (2)
procedures for reconciling the sometimes conflicting interests of stakeholders in accordance with
their duties, privileges, and roles, and (3) procedures for proper supervision, control, and
information-flows to serve as a system of checks-and-balances.
Governance refers specifically to the set of rules, controls, policies and resolutions put in place to
dictate corporate behaviour. Proxy advisors and shareholders are important stakeholders who
indirectly affect governance, but these are not examples of governance itself. The board of
directors is pivotal in governance, and it can have major ramifications for equity valuation.
The board of directors is the primary direct stakeholder influencing corporate governance.
Directors are elected by shareholders or appointed by other board members, and they represent
shareholders of the company. The board is tasked with making important decisions, such as
corporate officer appointments, executive compensation and dividend policy. In some instances,
board obligations stretch beyond financial optimization, when shareholder resolutions call for
certain social or environmental concerns to be prioritized.
Boards are often comprised of inside and independent members. Insiders are major
shareholders, founders and executives. Independent directors do not share the ties of the
insiders, but they are chosen because of their experience managing or directing other large
companies. Independents are considered helpful for governance, because they dilute the
concentration of power and help align shareholder interest with those of the insiders.
Bad corporate governance can cast doubt on a company's reliability, integrity or obligation to
shareholders. Tolerance or support of illegal activities can create scandals. Companies that do not
cooperate sufficiently with auditors or do not select auditors with the appropriate scale can
publish spurious or noncompliant financial results. Bad executive compensation packages fail to
create optimal incentive for corporate officers. Poorly structured boards make it too difficult for
shareholders to oust ineffective incumbents. Corporate governance became a pressing issue
following the 2002 introduction of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the United States, which was
ushered in to restore public confidence in companies and markets after accounting fraud
bankrupted high-profile companies such as Enron and WorldCom.
Good corporate governance creates a transparent set of rules and controls in which
shareholders, directors and officers have aligned incentives. Most companies strive to have a high
level of corporate governance. For many shareholders, it is not enough for a company to merely
be profitable; it also needs to demonstrate good corporate citizenship through environmental
awareness, ethical behaviour and sound corporate governance practices.
Note that the most important corporate governance reports in South Africa are the King I report
of 1994, the King II report of 2002, and the King III report of 2009. These reports came from
committees chaired by Mervyn King, who claimed that South Africa has taken the lead in defining
corporate governance in broadly inclusive terms, whereby companies consider the interests of a
wide range of stakeholders with regard to good financial, social, ethical and environmental
practice.
What is sustainability? Why do firms pursue it? Sustainability has been defined as the
ability “to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their needs.”
As regulatory pressures and societal demands for greater environmental and social
responsibility have increased, sustainability has become a key focus for many
organizations.
There is an emerging business case that corporate performance, under theright conditions, can
be enhanced in firms focused on sustainability. For example, a 2003 meta-analysis of
research studies suggests that corporate virtue in the form of social and environmental
responsibility is likely to pay off financially.
The HR function should help formulate and achieve environmental and social goals while
also balancing these objectives with traditional financial performance metrics.
The HR function can serve as a partner in determining what is needed or what is possible
in formulating corporate values and sustainability strategy. At the same time, HR should
play a key role in ensuring that employees implement the strategy consistently across the
organization.
Sustainable human resource management (HRM) can be defined as using the tools of HR
to create a workforce that has the trust, values, skills and motivation to achieve a
profitable triple bottom line.
Encouraging employees, through training and compensation, to find ways to reduce the
use of environmentally damaging chemicals in their products.
Assisting employees in identifying ways to recycle products that can be used for
playgrounds for children who don’t have access to healthy places to play.
For organizations aspiring to advance along the corporate responsibility path, the HR function is
arguably a critical partner. To get started on the sustainability journey, HR leaders should
understand and adopt the practices outlined by leading global frameworks. A number of
frameworks exist to support corporate sustainability strategy; however, only a few are truly
global, comprehensive and applicable to the majority of organizations.
Whichever standard or framework is adopted, the HR manager should review all HR core
functions relating to protection of employee rights, equal opportunity in employment,
recruitment, training, development, workplace facilities, health, safety and well-being,
compensation, organizational culture, and communications. The process will involve aligning all
aspects of the organization’s HR infrastructure to support new ways of working sustainably.
HR’s approach must always reflect the business approach to sustainability. Managers should
follow a broad roadmap that moves through understanding and engaging the stakeholders of the
HR function, identifying the most important issues that the HR function faces and examining all
the policies, processes, structures and cultural alignments required to deliver a sustainable HR
strategy effectively. This will include identifying appropriate sustainable HRM metrics and
correlating these with business outcomes.
• discuss how human resources can effectively integrate the HRIS with the intranet
• understand how technology can assist in creating and managing an effective talent
management strategy
• discuss why measuring a return on investment is an important step in the entire e-HR
process
E-HRM
Definition: E-HRM is the integration of all HR systems and activities using the web based
technologies. Simply, when HR uses the Internet or related technologies to support their activities,
procedures, processes, then it becomes an e-HRM.
Relational e-HRM: It is concerned with the supporting business processes Viz. Training,
recruitment, selection, etc.
Transformational e-HRM: It is concerned with the HR strategies and its activities such as
knowledge management, strategic orientation.
Through e-HRM, the main activities that could be performed online are Recruitment, Selection,
Training, Performance Management, and Compensation. The detailed description of these
activities is given below.
E-Recruitment: Also known as online Recruiting, is being widely used by companies these
days. Through e-Recruitment, companies usually hire the candidates using the internet as
a medium.
The common practice of facilitating the online recruitment is by uploading the recruitment
information on the company’s official website or hiring the online recruitment websites to
serve the purpose. Monster.com, Naukri.com, Timesjob.com are some of the well
renowned online recruitment websites.
E-Selection: The HR department using the online selection process must ensure that each
step complies with the procedural requirements viz. Project steps, vendor selection,
assessment steps, feedback to the candidates, etc. The purpose of E-selection is to utilize
the maximum human capital at a reduced cost and in less time.
E-Learning: It means using the internet or organization’s intranet to facilitate the training
and development programs for the workforce. Getting the online modules of training, a
large number of employees can be covered irrespective of their locations.
Thus, with the help of e-HRM, the records of all the employees sitting in different geographical
locations can be stored and also the new candidates could be hired from any part of the world.
Electronic or e-business will form the basis on which business will be conducted in the
future
Do more than just be aware of these changes, they must develop new 'best practices'
to address them
E-business is about doing business digitally - everything from buying and selling on the Web, to
extranets that link a company to suppliers, from intranets that enable an organisation to better
manage its knowledge to enterprise resource planning systems that streamline an enterprise's
supply chain, from electronic customer support to automated order tracking
Marie Karakanian:
E-business is the overall business strategy that redefines the old business models and uses digital
media and network technology to optimise customer value delivery.
It relies on Internet-based computing which is the platform that supports the open flow
of information between systems.
Technology is used in this case both as the actual cause and also driver of business
strategy.
It is used not only to develop the product or the service but also to provide better
choices to customers along with enhanced delivery options
Construct a coherent map identifying the areas where Web-based technology could be
introduced
3 core areas or domains (which can almost be seen as generic) that business should look
at:
– E-operations
– E-marketing
– E-services
E-operations - covers Web-based initiatives that improve the creation of existing products
important aspects: the way a business manages itself and its supply chain
o Where does e-business (not just e-commerce) fit in our strategic priorities?
o How will we ensure that the Internet does not make our niche in the value chain
obsolete?
o How will e-business help us attract new customers in the markets our strategy has
targeted?
o What role will our Web-site play? How will people find it?
o How will we ensure that we have the systems and technological capabilities to
implement this vision?
o How will we ensure that we have the human capabilities to implement this vision?
– Have to build at rapid speed the business and technical architectures required
E-business strategies;
Data management;
Security;
System-to-system integration;
Knowledge management;
Web-technology is changing every aspect of the way a company conducts its business
changing the way HR professionals do their job, and as a result, human resources has
become the latest partner in the Web development known as eHR
Describing e-HR
e-HR:
– needs to use wisely the network of technologies and various communication channels
such as the Web, wireless and perhaps kiosks
Human Resource Information System (HRIS) will form the backbone of the e-HR system.
It will interface with the organization’s intranet & connect to HR service suppliers and business
partners via an extranet as well as have links to the Internet via HR portals (single points of
access)
Process will allow cost-effective universal access to HR data by all authorized parties
(employees, managers, executives, HR service providers, relevant communities, corporate
customers and the public at large)
Will reduce the distance between the HR department and its internal customers
Online recruiting can eliminate paperwork and speed up the hiring process
Electronic benefits enrolment lets employees sort through options faster, while reducing
paperwork and questions for HR
Electronic payroll can cut costs and make data more easily accessible
Trading exchanges and e-market places can reduce the costs of products and services
Trading exchanges and e-market places can reduce the costs of products and services
E-procurement can eliminate catalogues and manual processes that are expensive and
slow
Electronic travel and expense reporting can crumple the paper glut and speed up
reimbursements to both employees and the company
Online retirement planning can help employees map out their future, while reducing
questions and paperwork for HR
Online learning can slash travel costs and make training available anytime, anywhere;
Disadvantages of e-HR
The security of the HR data (HR-related information is perhaps more critical than any
other because it involves private and highly sensitive individual data)
e-HR will play a crucial role in the e-operations' domain of the company
For the HR Web-site to achieve its full potential it is important to understand the levels of
Web-site development and how effectiveness increases as the site evolves to the next
level of sophistication
o Brochureware;
o Transactional;
o Integrated;
o Personalized.
E-HRM in practice
e-Recruitment and e-Selection
Lukaszewski & Isenhour (most common practices used for online recruitment) involve:
2) using specialized recruitment websites e.g. job portals, online job boards
3) developing interactive tools for processing applications such as online applications and
automatic E-mail responses
4) using online screening techniques such as keyword systems, online interviews and
personality assessment
b) Draft the desired flow process that will result from the e-selection process;
c) Consider how the various new stakeholders and clients (recruiters, administrators, etc.)
will use the system;
e) Draft the desired flow process that will result from the e-selection process;
f) Consider how the various new stakeholders and clients (recruiters, administrators, etc.)
will use the system;
i) Train the employees that will be responsible for the administration of the process.
k) Draft the desired flow process that will result from the e-selection process;
o) Train the employees that will be responsible for the administration of the
process.
E-training
o knowledge workers play an important part in the competitiveness of a company with the
rapid explosion of knowledge today, obsolescence of the knowledge workers possess is a
reality
How can this process be stopped? Answer lies in training. Training makes learning and relearning
essential if employees are to keep abreast with the latest developments in their fields.
Growing demand from companies for just-in-time training & cost effective ways to deliver this
training. There are four categories when it comes to e-learning, namely:
1. Independent e-learning
2. group-based e-learning
3. virtual classroom
4. blended learning
Compensation has become an important tool for attracting, retaining and motivating the
talent needed for survival over the long term
o Can increase access to critical compensation information without the need for
specialised IT staff to get involved
Tools thus enable an organization to gather, store, manipulate, analyze, utilize and
distribute compensation data and information
Software packages
• discuss the role of the learning organization and its benefits to all stakeholders
Change is inevitable
Organizations change all the time, every day. The change that occurs in organizations is, for the
most part, unplanned and gradual. Planned organizational change, especially on a large scale
affecting the entire system, is not exactly an everyday occurrence. Revolutionary change – a major
overhaul of the organization resulting in a modified or entirely new mission, a change in strategy,
leadership and culture – is rare indeed. Most organizational change is evolutionary. It is important
to note that change-capable organizations inspire continuous learning. In short, change is
inevitable if a company is to remain competitive in the business environment of today.
Change management
Change management is a systematic approach to dealing with change both from the perspective
of an organization and the individual.
A somewhat ambiguous term, change management has at least three different aspects, including:
adapting to change, controlling change, and effecting change. A proactive approach to dealing
with change is at the core of all three aspects. For an organization, change management means
defining and implementing procedures and/or technologies to deal with changes in the business
environment and to profit from changing opportunities.
Navigating in today's chaotic business environments is much like trying to steer a tiny boat back
to shore while caught in the center of a hurricane. There are many forces at work that a person
will need to respond to in order to make it safely back to port. Just like this tiny ship, today's
organizations and their managers are faced with a significant amount of factors that require an
immediate response, often in the form of organizational change. The forces that drive this change
in business are known as the internal and external environments. This lesson will discuss how
both the internal and external environments of an organization induce change.
The internal environment of an organization refers to events, factors, people, systems, structures,
and conditions inside the organization that are generally under the control of the company. The
company's mission statement, organizational culture, and style of leadership are factors typically
associated with the internal environment of an organization. As such, it is the internal
environment that will influence organizational activities, decisions, and employee behaviour and
attitudes. Changes in the leadership style, the organization's mission, or culture can have a
considerable impact on the organization.
The external environment are those factors that occur outside of the company that cause change
inside organizations and are, for the most part, beyond the control of the company. Customers,
competition, the economy, technology, political and social conditions, and resources are common
external factors that influence the organization. Even though the external environment occurs
outside of an organization, it can have a significant influence on its current operations, growth,
and long-term sustainability. Ignoring external forces can be a detrimental mistake for managers
to make. As such, it is imperative that managers continually monitor and adapt to the external
environment, working to make proactive changes earlier on rather than having to take a reactive
approach, which can lead to a vastly different outcome.
A manager will begin analyzing the internal environment by looking into inefficiencies inside the
organization, and will then look outside to the external environment and things occurring
independent of the organization. Environmental scans allow managers to use the knowledge
gained during the scanning process to decide what strategic steps, or changes, the organization
needs to take to create or maintain a competitive advantage.
Conducting a baseline assessment is an ideal process that will help any organization to identify
potential and actual barriers to change. Barriers will always crate a gap in recommended and
current practices, eventually having a negative effect on the daily production process of the
organization.
To prevent this from happening, it would be appropriate to pinpoint on the major barriers to
change as well as knowing how stay clear of them. Once you know how to solve these barriers, it
should be easy to plan and implement change. The most common barriers to change
implementation are often the following.
This is perhaps the most common barrier to change management. Employees always
have the fear of change, and unless they are involved in the change process, it is highly
likely that even the most loyal member of your employees will resist the change.
The biggest mistake some organizations make is failure to involve employees in the
change process. This spikes fear of the unknown, lack of desire to embrace a new culture
and eventually a complete barrier to the change.
Your efforts to introduce change can only succeed when you get employees involved in
the change process as much as possible. Getting the employees involved means listening
to their opinion, accounting for their output and assuring them that the change is for the
good of all in the organization including them.
Providing relevant, sufficient resources to drive them towards change will be a necessary
thing to do, so that they are comfortable and ready to adjust to the new development
within the organization.
Some organizations have no effective communication strategy. In fact, some top leaders always
assume that once they announce the change, people will adjust and be ready to get started with
the new development. This is the silliest way to introduce change, hence forceful resistance to the
change.
CEOs should stop making announcement and introduce strategies. Employees do not need to
know about the change only. They need to know how the change will affect them as well as how
they will adapt to the change.
Sometimes the planning team totally has no idea that the change will affect people. Of
course, the team at this state will only concentrate on planning administrative structure,
work area responsibilities, job responsibilities as well as work reporting structure.
More often than not, the planning team always fails to make decisions based on feelings
and intuitions. This really overlooks how people feel, reason and work hence barrier to
change.
The only way to break this barrier is for the planning team to understand that the
organization must not overlook the feelings of the employees. The organization has to do
whatever it takes to prevent deep resentments, which usually occur due to disrespect of
taboos and traditions at the workplace.
Change is always difficult for organizations that lack the idea of their current state. Trying to
introduce and implement change without conducting an assessment and understanding the
current blueprint of the organization is a common habit by many entities. Such entities actually
do not realize that the failure to analyze the current organization’s blueprint will cause a barrier to
the change they hope to introduce and implement.
The only way to get around this is to analyze and fully understand the current blueprint of the
organization before attempting to introduce or suggest any change. Once you go through the
blueprint and understand it clearly, it becomes easier to plan and transition to a future state.
• There comes a time when organizations begin to develop complex processes, making the
process of planning and implementing change a bit more complex.
• The complexities include complex processes, products and systems, all which contribute
to change barriers because they are often quite difficult for the members of the
organization to understand.
• It is necessary to break this barrier by introducing a keen and skillful approach to tackle
organizational fast growth as well as complexity. An organization can break this barrier by
employing diligent, quality and highly effective project and change management
approach.
• It is wise, however, never to tackle a change that is going to be too complex for your
organization. You also do not want to introduce and try to implement complex changes if
your organization still lacks the maturity to handle any complex change.
Once you understand and manage these barriers to change management, it will be easy to
implement the change. In the end, everyone in the organization will be comfortable to embrace
the new change.
Organizations that inspire continuous learning are generally known as learning organizations. In
these organizations, learning is accomplished by the organization as a whole and employees have
uninterrupted access to information and data, to name just a few of their characteristics.
A learning organization is the term given to an organization which facilitates the learning
of its employees so that the organization can continuously transforms itself.
Learning organization develops as a result of the pressures which are being faced by the
organizations these days for enabling them to remain competitive in the present day
business environment.
People have found the idea of a learning organization to be inspiring, yet difficult to
implement. It frequently involves deep change in the mind sets of employees as well as
the culture of the organization and the society. Such change does not occur overnight.
The following are some of the available definitions of the learning organization.
Peter Senge has defined the learning organization as the organization “in which you
cannot not learn because learning is so insinuated into the fabric of life.” According to him
the learning organizations are “ …organizations where people continually expand their
capacity to create the results they truly desire, where new and expansive patterns of
thinking are nurtured, where collective aspiration is set free, and where people are
continually learning to see the whole together”.
McGill and his colleagues had defined the learning organization as “a company that can
respond to new information by altering the very “programming” by which information is
processed and evaluated.”
A learning organization is one that is able to change its behaviours and mind-sets as a
result of experience. This may sound like an obvious statement, yet many organizations
refuse to acknowledge certain truths or facts and repeat dysfunctional behaviours over
and again.
This learning in the organization is a fighting process in the face of swift pace of change. In this
battle managers are responsible for increasing the awareness and the ability of the organizational
employees to comprehend and manage the organization and its environment. In this way they
can make decisions that continuously secure the organization to reach its goals.
However, most managers know how to ensure the organizational learning, but fail to understand
how to make their organization a learning organization.
Individuals and groups learn, and when conditions and systems are well designed. In a learning
organization, their learning can be shared across the organization and incorporated into its
practices, beliefs, policies, structure and culture.
The role of a leader in the learning organization is that of a designer, teacher, and steward who
can build shared vision and challenge prevailing mental models. He is responsible for building in
which the employees are continually expanding their capabilities to shape their future — that is,
leaders are responsible for learning.
The basic rationale for a learning organization is that in situations of rapid change only those that
are flexible, adaptive and productive will excel. For this to happen, it is argued, the organization
needs to ‘discover how to tap employee’s commitment and capacity to learn at all levels’
The learning organization aims to bring new ideas, debate issues, introduce innovative methods
and offer case studies to others.
Over time, the notion of “learning organization” as an idealized and apolitical ‘end-state’ rather
than as a process, has increasingly gained uncritical acceptance.
The key ingredient of the learning organization is in how the organization processes its
managerial experiences. A learning organization learns from the experiences rather than being
bound by its past experiences. In the learning organization, the ability of the organization and its
managers is not measured by what it knows (that is the product of learning), but rather by how it
learns — the process of learning. Management practices encourage, recognize, and reward with
openness, systemic thinking, creativity, a sense of efficacy, and empathy.
While all the employees have the capacity to learn, the structures in which they have to function
are often not conducive to reflection and engagement. Furthermore, the employees may lack the
tools and guiding ideas to make sense of the situations they face. Hence the learning organization
which is always aspiring for success in its operation is to create a future that requires a
fundamental shift of mind among its employees.
The idea of the learning organization developed from a body of work called systems thinking. This
is a conceptual framework that allows people to study businesses as bounded objects. Learning
organization uses this method of thinking when assessing the organization and has information
systems that measure the performance of the organization as a whole and of its various
components. Systems – thinking states that all the characteristics must be apparent at once in an
organization for it to be a learning organization. If some of these characteristics are missing then
the organization falls short of its goal. However some believes that the characteristics of a
learning organization are factors that are gradually acquired, rather than developed
simultaneously. Systems – thinking is the conceptual cornerstone of a learning organization. It is
the discipline that integrates all the employees of the organization, fusing them into a coherent
body of theory and practice. Systems thinking ability to comprehend and address the whole and
to examine the interrelationship between the parts provides for both the incentive and the means
to integrate various disciplines in the organization.
Personal Mastery
Organizations learn only through individuals who learn. Individual learning does not guarantee
organizational learning. But without it no organizational learning occurs. Personal mastery is the
discipline of continually clarifying and deepening employee’s personal vision, of focusing their
energies, of developing patience, and of seeing reality objectively. It goes beyond competence and
skills, although it involves them.
The commitment by an individual to the process of learning is known as personal mastery. There
is a competitive advantage for the organization over other competiting organizations if the
employees of the organization can learn more quickly. Individual learning is acquired through
employee’s training, development and continuous self-improvement, however learning cannot be
forced upon an individual who is not receptive to learning. Research shows that most learning in
the workplace is incidental, rather than the product of formal training. Therefore it is important to
develop a culture in the organization where personal mastery is practiced in daily life. A learning
organization has been described as the sum of individual learning, but there must be
mechanisms for individual learning to be transferred into organizational learning.
People with a high level of personal mastery live in a continual learning mode. They never ‘arrive’.
Sometimes, language, such as the term ‘personal mastery’ creates a misleading sense of
definiteness, of black and white. But personal mastery is not something you possess. It is a
process. It is a lifelong discipline. People with a high level of personal mastery are acutely aware
of their ignorance, their incompetence, and their growth areas. They are always deeply self-
confident.
Mental models are ‘deeply ingrained assumptions, generalizations, or even pictures and images
that influence how we understand the world and how we take action’.
The assumptions held by individuals and organizations are called mental models. To become a
learning organization, these models must be challenged. Individuals tend to espouse theories,
which are what they intend to follow, and theories-in-use, which are what they actually do.
Similarly, organizations tend to have ‘memories’ which preserve certain behaviours, norms and
values. In creating a learning environment it is important to replace confrontational attitudes with
an open culture that promotes inquiry and trust. To achieve this, the learning organization needs
mechanisms for locating and assessing organizational theories of action. Unwanted values need
to be discarded by the process called ‘unlearning’.
The discipline of mental models starts with turning the mirror inward; learning to unearth our
internal pictures of the world, to bring them to the surface and hold them rigorously to scrutiny. It
also includes the ability to carry on ‘learningful’ conversations that balance inquiry and advocacy,
where people expose their own thinking effectively and make that thinking open to the influence
of others.
If the organization is to develop a capacity to work with mental models then it is necessary for the
employees to learn new skills and develop new orientations. For this there need to be
institutional changes in order to foster such change. There need to have openness in the
organization. It also involved seeking to distribute organizational responsibly far more widely
while retaining coordination and control.
If any one idea about leadership that has inspired organizations for thousands of years, is the
capacity to hold a share picture of the future the organizations seek to create. Such a vision has
the power to be uplifting – and to encourage experimentation and innovation. Crucially, it is
argued, it can also foster a sense of the long-term vision, something that is fundamental
The practice of shared vision involves the skills of unearthing shared ‘pictures of the future’ that
foster genuine commitment and enrolment rather than compliance. In mastering this discipline,
management is to learn the counter-productiveness of trying to dictate a vision, no matter how
heartfelt it is.
Visions spread because of a reinforcing process. Increased clarity, enthusiasm and commitment
rub off on others in the organization. ‘As people talk, the vision grows clearer. As it gets clearer,
enthusiasm for its benefits grow. There are ‘limits to growth’ in this respect, but developing the
sorts of mental models can significantly improve matters. Where the organizations can transcend
linear and grasp system thinking, there is the possibility of bringing vision to fruition.
Team Learning
The accumulation of individual learning constitutes team learning. The benefit of team or shared
learning is that the employees grow more quickly and the problem solving capacity of the
organization is improved through better access to knowledge and expertise. A learning
organization has structures that facilitate team learning with features such as boundary crossing
and openness. Team learning requires individuals to engage in dialogue and discussion.
Therefore team members must develop open communication, shared meaning, and shared
understanding. A learning organization typically has excellent knowledge management structures,
allowing creation, acquisition, dissemination, and implementation of this knowledge in the
organization.
Team learning is viewed as ‘the process of aligning and developing the capacities of a team to
create the results its members truly desire. It builds on personal mastery and shared vision – but
these are not enough. Employees need to be able to act together. When teams learn together
then not only there are good results for the organization but the team members also grow more
rapidly which could not have happened otherwise.
The discipline of team learning starts with ‘dialogue’, the capacity of members of a team to
suspend assumptions and enter into a genuine ‘thinking together’.
The notion of dialogue amongst team members helps them to become open to the flow of a
larger intelligence. When the dialogue is joined with systems thinking, there is the possibility of
creating a language more suited for dealing with complexity, and of focusing on deep-seated
structural issues and forces rather than being diverted by questions of personality and leadership
style.
A learning organization does not rely on passive or ad hoc process in the hope that organizational
learning will take place through serendipity or as a by-product of normal work. A learning
organization actively promotes, facilitates, and rewards collective learning. The main benefits of a
learning organization are as follows.
Improving the corporate image of the organization by becoming more people oriented
More and more companies, both large enterprises and emerging players, are developing
company-wide talent development and learning strategies. Alongside this the role of the Chief
Learning Officer (CLO) has also rapidly evolved. Here are key points you need to know about the
role of the CLO and how it might apply to your business:
What Is a CLO?
A Chief Learning Officer (CLO) is the person in charge of the corporate learning program for a
company. According to elearningmind.com, an example of a successful Chief Learning Officer is
Amy Hayes, who serves as Facebook’s Global head of Learning and Development, which finds her
leading the growth of more than 9,500 employees.
CLO’s help to create strategies for employees related to their training, credentialing, learning and
development, all within the context of creating and sustaining the overall corporate culture and
building the talent pipeline for future leadership. The CLO’s responsibilities often include:
There are various types of industries that prefer to have a CLO within the organization, including
human resources, healthcare and pharmaceuticals, training, and information technology.
Businesses benefit from the role of the CLO because there is always a need to educate and train
employees in order to remain current, growth-oriented and ‘set apart’ from other companies.
Having a person in charge of making sure that a business is always in touch with what is going on
in the world, and how to upgrade the business culture and talent pool skills successfully, makes it
an easier process within the organization. Having someone whose specific tasks is to make sure
that employees are constantly learning new ideas in the process of working is a beneficial way to
strive to build and maintain a successful business.
According to clomedia.com, the following are key suggestions of best practices to build a
successful career as an effective Chief Learning Officer.
This will help explain why individual and organizational growth and development is
necessary within the company and to help for see the enterprise training and professional
pathways strategy into the future.
Do not expect the HR Director to plan your career
This basically means do not wait for your chance to be noticed. Keep producing your work
sufficiently and try to make yourself stand out. If you wait for someone to notice you, you
will be behind the learning curve for the business or organization. Being a CLO means you
always have to be a couple steps ahead of the company to help it be more effective.
If you stay only in your area of expertise and never attempt to experience other areas of
your work environment, your ideas dealing with improving the effectiveness will become
worthless.
Use every communication tool available to reinforce training’s value and contribution
Use every communication tool available to communicate your vision for the company. If
the organization you work for has an employee intranet, a newsletter, bulletin boards, etc.,
these are perfect tools to broadcast your ideas and initiatives to other employees.
• debate the duality raised by the simultaneous need for standardization and localization of
HRM
• identify some of the new features of IHRM that are changing the way organizations
operate
IHRM
“Human resource management issues, functions, policies and practices that result
from the strategic activities of multinational enterprises and that impact on the
international concerns and goals of those enterprises”
How do organizations (that operate in many countries) cope with the cultural and institutional
differences?
Universalist
Contextual
Are the differences between societies (in the way that people are managed) being reduced as
globalization increases?
© 2018 Together We Pass. All rights reserved.
Pg.90
Early management theorists thought that a form of "social Darwinism" = that
successful management practices would "crowd out" less successful ones and
management practices would inevitably converge towards the most efficient (they
argued for the U.S. model)
Theoretical possibilities:
Neither institutions nor cultures change quickly and rarely in ways that are the same
as other countries - managers within one country behave in a way that is noticeably
different from managers in other countries;
Cultural and institutional explanators are the differences between countries “sustained because
people find it repulsive, unethical or unappealing to do otherwise... [Or]... because a wider formal
system of laws, agreements, standards and codes exist?”
“culturists” school includes many different approaches they share the notion that it is not
possible to depart radically from established rules and norms
Culture is shared by individuals to confer meaning and to add sense to social interactions
National culture has an influence and organizations should not work against this
Cultural differences will inevitably be reflected in the differences in the way people are
managed
Cultural writers:
see institutions as being key artefacts of culture, reflecting deep underlying variations in
the values that they see between societies
Institutional writers:
Institutions cannot survive without legitimacy, but the way they operate also affects the
views of people in a society about what is legitimate
Human resource management is one of the areas where organizations are most likely to
maintain a 'national flavour'
advantages of integration – ensuring that HRM policies and practices are as far as
possible similar in all countries
Need to assess what we mean by the term IHRM; how we are to conceptualize it; what
areas and activities it includes; and model its drivers and enablers
Expatriation
o expatriates are among the most expensive human resources in any internationally
operating organization and they are almost invariably in crucial positions for the
organization
o expatriates experience a wider range of issues and problems than other staff,
thus the management of them is more challenging
o expatriates are often far from being the best managed employees
o how organizations could adapt their HRM approaches and practices to fit the
external environment in which the firm operates, and its strategic intent
While these attitudes have been a useful way of demonstrating the various
approaches to staffing foreign operations, it should be stressed that the above
categories refer to managerial attitudes that reflect the socio-cultural environment in
which the internationalising firm is embedded. A number of factors influence the
IHRM approach taken by an MNC.
These include the level of international experience of the firm, the method by which
worldwide subsidiaries are founded, the technology and the nature of the product or
products of the MNC, etc.
1. The nature of IHRM may be restricted by government policies and legal regulations
in the host country.
2. Culture, particularly national culture at the headquarters, plays a role in determining IHRM
practices. Culture may affect HQ decisions in two ways:
(a) Some cultures are simply more comfortable than others in taking an ethnocentric approach
to management.
(b) The mix of cultures in the subsidiaries of an MNC and the level of cultural difference among
the subsidiaries of an MNC will restrict the IHRM approach taken.
3. MNCs with extensive international experience have had the opportunity to develop more
diverse methods of maintaining coordination and control over their foreign operations.
4. The method used to establish operations in foreign locations may also affect HR policies. For
example, HR practises in the acquired/ merged operation will reduce the wholesale exportation of
home-country HR systems into the subsidiary.
5. An MNC opening subsidiaries in developed countries face a much different I HRM challenge
than one opening subsidiaries in developing countries. Developed countries have well educated
staff having technical and management experience.
Need to fill and manage important assignments that may not be in the home country
One-off" approach
There is evidence that there are variations between firms in the use of expatriates based
on size, organizational age and nationality
o key task and one that can be undertaken through a variety of mechanisms but is
not without its problems
international commuters
development of technology
selection of expatriates
expatriate adjustment
performance measurement
repatriation of expatriates
We live in rapidly changing times, especially for businesses. Consider that, in a single generation,
businesses have had to adapt to entirely new marketing channels (web and social), decide how to
invest in and utilize new technologies, and compete on a global stage — things that were barely
imaginable to our parents’ and grandparents’ generations.
One side effect of these rapid changes and growth is that no single CEO — or any employee, for
that matter — can be an expert in everything. This was, perhaps, always true, but it has never
been more apparent.
This is why, in my opinion, some of the biggest challenges businesses face today are best met and
addressed with qualified consultants. Bringing on a consultant helps CEOs add the expertise and
skills they need to address particular problems at particular times, and can provide the best
possible outcomes.
Just a few of the challenges I see businesses facing that are best addressed with the help of a
consultant include:
Being able to predict customer trends, market trends, etc. is vital to a changing economic climate,
but not every CEO has Warren Buffett-like predictive powers. Bringing in a consultant trained in
reading and predicting those all-important trends could be the difference between a bright future
and a murky one.
Many CEOs I know are ideas people; that means they’re great at the big picture and disruptive
thinking, but less good with things like cash flow, profit margins, reducing costs, financing, etc.
Small and medium businesses may not require a full-time CFO, but would do better to employ a
financial consultant who can step into the role as needed.
Monitoring performance
Using a meaningful set of rounded performance indicators that provide the business with insights
about how well it is performing is key. Most business people I know are not experts in how to
develop KPIs, how to avoid the key pitfalls and how to best communicate metrics so that they
inform decision-making. In most cases companies rely on overly simple finance indicators that
just clog up the corporate reporting channels.
As markets and technologies shift, so do rules and regulations. Depending on your industry, it can
make much more sense to bring in a consultant to help with these areas rather than trying to
understand the complexities yourself — and risk fines or worse for non-compliance.
Again, a small or medium-sized business might not need full-time human resources or recruiting
staff, but during peak growth periods, finding the right people and developing the right skills and
competencies is the key to a sustainable future. Bringing in a consultant with the expertise to find
exactly the workers you need would be a wise investment.
Technology
As technologies change practically at the speed of light, it’s vital for companies to innovate or be
left behind — but many CEOs started their careers and businesses before many of these
technologies even existed! Consultants can be vital for integrating new technologies, in particular
mobile, app development, and cloud computing.
Exploding data
Grandpa’s generation certainly didn’t have to deal with terabytes of data or worry about what to
do with it. 90% of the world’s data was created in the past two years and managing, keeping safe
and extracting insights from the ever-increasing amounts of data your company produces needs
to be in the hands of a qualified professional who can help you get the most return from that
data.
Customer service
In a world of instant gratification, customers expect instant customer service — and can take to
the web to share their displeasure at less than satisfactory service just as quickly. Consultants can
find ways to improve customer service and bring it into the 21st century.
In a similar vein, because customers can voice any displeasure so much more publicly and loudly
than ever before, businesses have to monitor and maintain their online reputations. And while it’s
an important task, it’s one best suited to a third party who can monitor and mediate with a certain
amount of distance.
Early adopter or late to the game? Consultants can help CEOs determine when to embrace
change and when to stay the course. Not everything new is better, yet eschewing every change
runs the risk of becoming obsolete. A professional outside opinion can make all the difference in
these decisions.
We are living in an era of constant change for the foreseeable future: change is the new normal.
Preparing for and embracing that change by investing in the right kind of advice is the best way to
meet these challenges head on.
Virtual organization
Just-in-time workplace
Aging workforce
Six-domain framework for conceptualizing HR competencies (see figures ‘‘Six domains to become
a successful HR professional’’ and ‘‘Competencies for the HR professional of the future’’)
It is often easier to look back to what has been than forward to what might be. HR has a rich
history, but an even more exciting future. In the past half-century or so, the HR profession has
been through three general waves and a fourth is emerging. Each wave follows a similar curve
through time with start-up, learning, growth, and then stability. Wave one emphasised the
administrative work of HR, where HR personnel focused on terms and conditions of work, delivery
of HR services and regulatory compliance. HR was predominantly what we would describe as an
“administrative and transactional utility”. Wave one HR roles tended to be filled with people who
did an excellent job of administration. The transaction and administrative work of HR continues
today, but it is done differently through outsourcing and technology solutions.
Wave three has focused on the connection of individual and integrated HR practices to business
success through strategic HR. For the last 15 to 20 years, HR has worked to link its work to the
strategy or purposes of a business. This work has expanded HR practices from a primary focus on
talent to include contribution to culture and leadership. Given a business’s strategy, HR
professionals would be charged with assessing and improving talent, culture, and leadership to
accomplish the strategy. In this wave, HR professionals turned strategies into HR priorities to
deliver on strategic promises.
The worldwide economic crisis, globalization, technological innovations, and other changes in
recent years have challenged the future of HR. Some HR leaders want to look back and reinforce
HR administrative work by doing basics well and others want to return to focusing on targeted HR
practices. I would rather look forward to a new normal for HR.
Wave four uses HR practices to derive and respond to external business conditions, called “HR
from the outside in”. Outside-in HR goes beyond strategy to align its work with business contexts
and stakeholders. The three earlier waves represent HR work that still has to be done well: HR
administration must be flawless; HR practices must be innovative and integrated; and HR must
turn strategic aspirations into HR actions. But rather than rely on these waves, future-facing HR
professionals should look outside their organisations to customers, investors, and communities
to define successful HR.
For HR to deliver the standards of the first three waves and the promises of the fourth (outside-
in), our research shows that HR professionals must master six competencies. These competencies
are based on research from more than 20,000 respondents around the world. These 20,000
respondents (HR professionals and their line and HR associates) completed assessments of HR
competence on 140 behavioural and knowledge items.
HR professionals in high-performing firms function as credible activists. They do what they say
that will do. Such results-based integrity serves as the foundation of personal trust that, in turn,
translates into professional credibility. They have effective interpersonal skills. They are flexible in
developing positive chemistry with key stakeholders. They translate this positive chemistry into
influence that contributes to business results. They take strong positions about business issues
that are grounded in sound data and thoughtful opinions.
Strategic Positioner
High-performing HR professionals understand the global business context – the social, political,
economic, environmental, technological, and demographic trends that bear on their business –
and translate these trends into business implications. They understand the structure and logic of
their own industries and the underlying competitive dynamics of the markets they serve,
including customer, competitor, and supplier trends. They then apply this knowledge in
developing a personal vision for the future of their own company. They participate in developing
customer-focused business strategies and in translating the business strategy into annual
business plans and goals.
Capability builder
Change champion
Effective HR professionals develop their organizations’ capacity for change and then translate that
capacity into effective change processes and structures. They ensure a seamless integration of
change processes that builds sustainable competitive advantage. They build the case for change
based on market and business reality, and they overcome resistance to change by engaging key
stakeholders in key decisions and building their commitment to full implementation. They sustain
change by ensuring the availability of necessary resources including time, people, capital, and
information, and by capturing the lessons of both success and failure.
Technology proponent
For many years, HR professionals have applied technology to basic HR work. HR information
systems (HRIS) have been applied to enhance the efficiency of HR processes including benefits,
payroll processing, health care funding, record keeping, and other administrative services. In this
HRIS round, we see a dramatic change in the implications of technology for HR professionals. At
the organisation level, high-performing HR professionals are now involved in two additional
categories of technological application.
First, HR professionals are applying social networking technology to help people stay connected
with each other. They help guide the connectedness of people within the firm and the
connectedness between people outside firms (especially customers) with employees inside the
firm.
Second, in the high-performing firms, HR professionals are increasing their role in the
management of information. This includes identifying the information that should receive focus,
bundling that information into useable knowledge, leveraging that knowledge into key decisions,
and then ensuring that these decision are clearly communicated and acted upon. This updates
the operational efficiency competency and will add substantive value to their organizations.
It is a great time to be in HR because the future holds not only a promise, but a pathway to
business impact. As HR professionals master these six competencies, they will not only be seen as
more effective HR professionals, they will add explicit value to their business. Our research shows
that being a credible activist helps HR professionals gain personal credibility, but being capability
builders, HR innovators and integrators and technology proponents have more impact on
business performance.
Rest assured that HR - Human Resource - will continue to play an important role in organizations,
national governments, and so on.
You may notice that HR issues are making the headlines from time to time and almost as often as
issues in finance, marketing, production, and so on.
It is predicted the use of technology in twenty first century HR service delivery will become
more widespread. There is currently a keen debate on this.
While it is true that the use of technology - including in HR - will become more widespread
in the future, it is very probable that this will involve mostly large organizations.
Technology is not cheap. A lot of small corporate entities cannot afford it.
But questions arise: "How will organizations identify the technology best suited to their
needs?
What strategies can organizations employ to ensure that their employees can, will and
continue to use technology for the intended purpose?
In-depth understanding of your operational activities and the strategies you want to adopt
will help in this respect.
New technology takes time to master. It takes additional effort to continue using systems
driven by new technology.
The apparent truth of the suggestion that more employees will learn to use technology
goes without saying. Whether they will use it for the good of all parties is an open
question.
Apart from this, there is a tendency by a lot of employees to misuse technology during
working hours.
Surveys conducted at the present day show that a lot of employees spend their working
hours surfing the internet and communicating through emails that has nothing to do with
their work.
In fact, the surveys show that many employees communicate to their friends about
negative things about their organizations.
Plan well in order to ensure that technology plays the proper role in twenty first century
HR and strategically fit into your overall organization's plan.
Technology must complement Human Resource management. It is only reasonable to expect that
in twenty first Century HR people and strategic utilization of technology will continue to contribute
to the success of your organization.
At these times when great technological advancements are being made, it is only logical
that you use the relevant technology in planning to advance the cause of human resource
development.
For example, you can use the latest technology in implementing human resources
information system or HRIS, and / or Executive Information System (EIS).
An EIS is intended to provide management with strategic information that can facilitate
better decision making.
Another area where you may want to employ technology is the tracking of your human
resources performance by using an HR Performance Dashboard. This is part of
performance management.
In every initiative that you take in improving human resource management by using
technology, ensure that the best possible option and most cost-effective type is selected.
John Sanders, a Hewitt consultant, had provided us with insights on some of the more
important twenty first century HR strategies that organizations can adopt.
Organization's preparation for twenty first century HR involves carrying out the following,
based on what Sanders had stated.
Understand your organization's direction. Get the support of your business leaders and
key HR people in formulating and implementing HR strategies.
Understanding your customer. Try to fully understand your customers' business issues
and needs.
Further to this, using the Dave Ulrich model in formulating HR strategy can help
organizations move smoothly into the twenty first century. (We will have more on this at a
later date.)
It is said that outsourcing will become more widespread in future. This is a real possibility
because of organizations' emphasis on cost control.
If your organization intends to do this, first answer the question "How can my
organization make substantial reduction in HR costs but retain overall control or ultimate
control over people?"
Under this arrangement, you may want to outsource the entire HR function or certain
activities to an independent management company or organization.
You can always cease outsourcing the HR activities without too much risk to your
organization. Ensure that this is inserted as a term in the agreement with the selected
management company.
If people are the most important asset, why do organizations give them away under a "total HR
outsourcing" arrangement?
It is true that outsourcing is a strategy, but it is only one of the many HR strategies available to
you.
What are the repercussions when performance appraisal is carried out by the
organization's assessors but the rewards are subject to the participation or determination
by "outsiders"?
How will line managers relate to the external HR service provider? How will this affect
their effectiveness?
How can employees trust their employer if they are "seemingly" working for another
organization?
These are only some of the questions that need answering. There are others depending on the
organization.
Even total outsourcing of the recruitment function may fall short of your expectation of the
results.
Experts had spent years in identifying HR strategies and how these can help to drive
organizational success.
And in spite of the HR strategies that proponents have put forward, there are still conflicting facts
about human resource management and the real strategic role of people. And now, we are
talking about twenty first century HR. Will organizations continue to look for the proverbial needle
in the haystack, namely HR strategies that answer to 21st century organizational challenges?
Many had accepted that an organization's most important resource are people. However, it was
found that the number of organizations that had implemented strategic human resource
management is small.
In addition, human resources are often the target during hard times or economic downturns.
Is this the way that twenty first century organizations want to see happening in twenty first
century HR?
How can you ensure that this remains so and how fast can organizations make the transformation in the
way they manage people?
Many organizations attempted to look for the answers in the past and continue to do so to the
present day.
The number of organizations that will seek for the answers at this very dawn of the twenty first
century will undoubtedly, increase. They will do so for as long as machines or robots cannot
reason and act as human beings. That time will never come to pass. Machines have no heart.
The right HR strategies can help HR continue on the road to truly become a business strategic
partner.
Many HR experts are anxious in helping organizations manage HR well. And this is a very good for
the future of HR.
The question remains, "Will the majority of organizations take advantage of the benefits of twenty
first century HR strategies that have the potential of propelling their success to new heights?
However, it is noted that there are so many people - commentators, professionals and experts,
HR practitioners, writers - who are convinced that HR will play a more, if not the most, critical role
in organizations of the future. No corporate leader, no organization can afford to remain at the
sidelines of strategic HR management.
Compelling signs are there. What remains is for organizations to conduct the necessary
investigations, make the required decision and take definite plans to implement strategies in
managing their people. This is a proactive move in the right direction.
Whatever the future holds in store, nothing can take over the role of people.
I hope you found these notes useful. We see it as a LIVING DOCUMENT that will be continuously
updated every term to add more and more insight into each subject. The best set of notes
written collaboratively over the years.
If you would like further help with improving your marks please join us in our Together We Pass
study groups which have other great ways of improving your marks.
Improve understanding and great time management as tutors lead every group
Never get stuck again – ask fellow members in your group and your tutor for help when you are
stuck
Instant study support!
Access to the biggest library of notes, past papers and tutorial letters available to UNISA
students ANYWHERE!
Get awesome marks through our cheat-free Assignment Comparison App
Ace those exams by using our Exam Revision App
We look forward joining you on this journey that is a UNISA degree and hope to see you in the
groups soon.
Click here to create your free account with Together We Pass, and start adding your subjects in
our shop to join the best UNISA study groups available anywhere.
Keep well
EMAIL [email protected]
WEB www.togetherwepass.co.za
FB www.facebook.com/togetherwepass
GOOGLE+ Together We Pass on Google Plus
TWITTER @togetherwepass