Spe 12168 MS
Spe 12168 MS
Spe 12168 MS
SPE 12168
This paper was presented at the 58th Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held in San Francisco, CA, October 5-8, 1983. The material is subject
to correction by the author. Permission to copy is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words. Write SPE, 6200 North Central Expressway,
Drawer 64706, Dallas, Texas 75206 USA. Telex 730989 SPEDAL.
11. Coulter, A. W., Copeland, C. T., and Harris- 15. Gruesbeck, C. and Collins, R. E.: "Entrain-
berger, W. H.: "A Laboratory Study of Clay ment and Deposition of Fine Particles in
Stabilizers," Soc. Pet. Eng. J. {Oct. 1979} Porous Media," Soc. Pet. Eng. J. {Dec. 1982}
267-269. 847-856.
12. McLaughl in, H. C., El phingstone, E. A., and 16. Clementz, D. M.: "Cl ay Stabil ization in Sand-
Hall, R. E.: "Aqueous Polymers for Treating stones through Adsorption of Petrol eum Heavy
Cl ays in Oil and Gas Producing Formations," Ends," J. Pet. Tech. {Sept. 1977} 1061-1066.
paper SPE 6008 presented at the SPE-AIME 51st
Annual Fall Technical Conference and Exhibi- 17. Barkman, J. H., Abrams, A., Darley, H. C. H.,
tion,· New Orleans, Oct. 3-6, 1976. and Hill, H•.J.: "An Oil Coating Process to
Stabilize Clays in Fresh Water Flooding
13. Copeland, C. 1., Coulter, A. W., and Harris- Operations," paper SPE 4786 presented at the
berger, W. H.: "Designed Appl ication of Cl ay SPE-AIME Symposium on Formation Damage
Stabilizer Improves Performance," paper SPE Control, New Orleans, Feb. 7-8, 1974.
6759 presented at the SPE-AIME 52nd Annual
Fall Technical Conference and Exhibition, 18. Khilar, K. C. and Fogler, H. S.: "Water
Denver, Oct. 9-12, 1977. Sensitivity of Sandstones," Soc. Pet. Eng. J.
{Feb. 1983} 55-64.
14. Muecke, T. W.: "Formation Fines and Factors
Controlling Their Movement in Porous Media,"
J. Pet. Tech. {Feb. 1979} 144-150.
Bulk Fines
Core
-- ( <5].lm)
= 0 - 1.9 cm 3/s
q
-+-+--+-,v = 0 - 0.37 cm/s
HASSLER CEll
PARTICLE SIZE
ANALYZER
TRANSDUCER~ECORDER
SYSTEM
100 r"-, I I
'-.
.....................
---------------
'--- ~~--------------------~-
-
< Vc
---------- V
----v>V c
-
o L -__________ L - I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _L - I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _- - '
0200400
CUMULATIVE PORE VOLUMES
!§~
2
Ll.v Ll.v
'-----j b--
~~60
~Ll.V -------
:;;
lOO~-.~~,--------,--------,-----~
~ 1--___~v~<:...:cVc'----_ _ _ _ _+-_______v~_v_"c_ _ _ _ _--j
10'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I INPUT lEVEl
I
I
I
I IOl I~
I
I CUMULATIVE PORE VOLUMES
I
I
j--'-V C = 0.007 Fig. 4-Particle concentration surges with changes in the fluid velocity.
Fig. 3-Srine flow above the critical velocity causes permeability damage.
............ --- -- ---__
1---- -
I __
----.J - - __
I
flOW
FORWARO flOW -
0.007 cm/s REVERSAL
f.----...r- v<
r~
Vc
"-
-
----V>Vc
r- t---.. t-- -
r-
1-1-1--
REVERSE flOW
006 cm/s
,....211
; I
I
I
I
2-10 I--- --............ - I
~
I
i
I
I-- ........... I
I
t- ~ I
I
~ 0 -r- I
I
I
I 2 4 6 7 8 9 10 211 I
I
SIZE, pm
1
I
I
I
i-- Vc
I
= 0.007
I
Fig. 5-Effluent particle size distribution is independent of flow velocity and direction. I
I
01 0.4
SUPERFICIAL VElOCITY, cm/s
Fig. 7-0il flow at connate water does not cause permeability damage.
100====~----'-------~'-------~'-------~
80
I-
Z
LU
t..J
a:
~
goo
z
~
a:
~40
==
~ - - - CaCl 2 OR H20 SATURATION; H20 FLOW
:E
ffi ------ KCI OR NaCI SATURATION; H20 FLOW
£l..20
= 0.007
\,
OL-~~==~~~====~==-===-===-==~-===-==~·~~~
02 0.3 0.4
SUPERFICIAL VELOCITY, cm/s
Fig. a-Permeability damage from fresh water flow depends on initial saturation.
100 - - v-
A
I I
KCl OR NaCI \
SATURATION .
-
\ -
\ V< Vc
\ ---V> Vc
- \ -
\
\
-
- ----------
-
H2 O
flOW
" ' ........
........
- -
BRINE flOW
o I I
o 2 3 200 400 600
CUMULATIVE PORE VOLUMES
Fig. 9-Fresh water flow damage is arrested by brine flow at a controlled velocity.
l00~--------~I----------~I~--------~
- - - - Hz 0 FLOW IANY vI
I- 80 t- -
as ___ BRINE FLOW
~
l:t. ,
COOL. -
~ I FLOW REVERSAL
~
5 ~~
i !r~"~._____
-----------------v-<~vc----~-----4_
~ i . . . . . . . . . . . __
~~ 20 ~, "
i,
--------
v> Vc --_.::
\..~-
DL-~--------~----------~----------~
1 I
0200400 600
CUMULATIVE PORE VOLUMES
Fig. lO-Flow reversal with brine partially restores fresh water flow damage.
l00~----------",----------------------~
' ..... v<v ,
..... __
V> ---
c _
vc -
I+-KCI OR NaCI INJECTION 1< 1 PVI
I~
I
-
i
! -
I
',eaozOR HzO SATURATION; HzO FLOW
D~---------L-I\~~~~=-~-=-~-=-~-~-=====-~-=-~~__~
0200400 600
CUMULATIVE PORE VOLUMES
Fig. ll-KCI or NaCI injection can readily sensitize cores to fresh water flow.
100 KCI-OR NaCI~ CLAY T',. . . . . - - -v < vc
SATURATION STABILIZERJ ' ' ' __
-
I-
I I
10 20 200 400
CUMULATIVE PORE VOLUMES
Fig. 12-Pretreatment with a clay stabilizer prevents only chemical incompatibility damage.
100 -l~ I I T
'"\
----
I,
1\
,
\,
'------- --- ---- _----
I
rvc = D.DDl
,
I
I I I
D~~~----~--------L---------~------~
0.1 Dl 0.3 0.4
SUPERFICIAL VELOCITY, cm/s
Fig. 13-Pretreatment with a clay stabilizer does not prevent mechanical flow
damage.