2019 en AKF Inclusive Classroom Guide
2019 en AKF Inclusive Classroom Guide
2019 en AKF Inclusive Classroom Guide
Creating an
Inclusive Learning
Environment
“Educating effective future leaders is a high responsibility.”
“To do it well, we must look beyond the world, which is passing from sight and turn our eyes to
the unchartered world of the future. We must rise above the antiquated approaches of earlier
days and instead infuse our students with what I would call three “A’s” of modern learning - the
spirit of anticipation, the spirit of adaptation and the spirit of adventure. This will happen best in
learning environments which are both serious and focused on the one hand, but which are also
joyous and inspiring places, operating on the cutting edge of pedagogy and knowledge.”
The Aga Khan Foundation (AKF) believes that teachers and school leaders are at the heart of
educational change. Drawing on over 100 years of learning experiences in education across
15 countries in Asia and Africa, AKF and the broader agencies of the Aga Khan Development
Network (AKDN) work with schools, governments and key partners to develop
globally-informed and locally-rooted teaching and learning solutions. Alongside the broader
approach of the AKDN in advancing pluralism as an ethic of respect for diversity, the Aga Khan
Foundation (AKF) has adopted pluralism and ethics as the lens through which it approaches its
work with teachers and educators in equipping young people with the attitudes and values
required to become contributing members of society. AKF’s education programme focuses on
enhancing students’ curiosity, imagination, resilience, and the capacity to respect and care
about the well-being of themselves, their friends, families, communities and planet.
This classroom guide has been designed to provide a set of guidelines for teachers and
educators defining and creating positive classroom experiences for early years, primary, and
secondary students. The guide is based on a large body of research suggesting that personal
qualities that are also defined as social and emotional skills, can enhance academic
achievement and student well-being.1 This includes the growing evidence that students who
experience classrooms that are guided by principles of positive and trusted relationships
demonstrate better achievement in the short - and long-term.2
The tool offers examples of each aspect of positive emotional climate and instructional quality,
but not all of these will be relevant for each context. Users are strongly encouraged to
contextualise and adapt the guide to create a set of relevant examples for each dimension
described.
1
Bruns et al., RISE Working Paper: Measures of effective teaching in developing countries, 2016; McKinsey, and Company, How to improve student
educational outcomes: new insights from data analytics, 2017; OECD, Learning Framework 2030: The future of education and skills, 2018.
2
AKES, Teaching and Learning at the heart of school improvement (Draft), 2018; Teachstone - CLASS, Effective-Teacher Child Interactions and Child
Outcomes, 2017.
The guide is intended to be used as a professional development tool, along with others, to
promote best practices in creating a classroom environment in which students not only gain
knowledge and skills required for success in the 21st century, but also develop pluralistic and
ethical attitudes and values necessary for individual and societal well-being and stability. The
guide considers ten dimensions of an inclusive classroom environment, the first three of which
comprise the essentials of a positive emotional climate: emotional climate (positive and
negative), teacher sensitivity and classroom agreements. The additional seven dimensions are
grouped under the category of instructional quality: effective facilitation, learning objectives
and sequencing, differentiation, individual and collaborative learning, learning to learn
strategies, assessment and feedback strategies. Under each dimension, detailed teaching
strategies/descriptors and developmental dialogue questions encourage teachers to consider
how they can explicitly integrate pluralistic and ethical attitudes and values across the
planning, delivering and evaluating phases of their lesson.
The World Bank has also recently published Teach, a teaching measurement toolkit, which
uses observation to holistically measure teaching quality – including social-emotional learning
– in low- and middle-income countries3. AKF’s Classroom Guide to Creating an Inclusive
Learning Environment complements Teach. The guide is a capacity building tool that focuses
on building understanding of what quality and inclusive teaching and learning looks like, using
observation as a method. With this aim in mind, the guide elaborates on the dimensions
associated with an inclusive learning environment – including the centrality of a positive
emotional climate. A second aim of the guide is to introduce a focus on pluralism and ethics as
both a lens and vehicle to enhancing teacher-student and student-student relationships.
3
Bruns et al., RISE Working Paper: Measures of effective teaching in developing countries, 2016; McKinsey, and Company, How to improve student
educational outcomes: new insights from data analytics, 2017; OECD, Learning Framework 2030: The future of education and skills, 2018.
The focus on pluralism and ethics is also connected to several social and emotional skills and
personal competencies.
4
Hattie, John, Visible Learning, 2009; Hamre, Bridget and Robert Pianta, 2003; Gillispie, Mary, 2002.
Descriptions under each dimension that connect to these pluralistic and ethical skills and
attitudes have been marked with
2. Teachers’ professional development processes. The mentor and the teacher should
mutually agree to focus on one or two dimensions at a time, as relevant to the
professional development needs and plans of the teacher. The professional
development dialogues presented at the end of each section are suggested starting
points to support individual reflection and mentoring. These questions are intended to
be explored in an open-ended discussion format, following peer observation with a
teacher. The questions can be taken as a whole or used in parts to apply to the entire
dimension, rather than specific indicators. The most important aspect of the
development dialogues is to promote introspection and reflection on areas to improve
teaching practices without ‘ranking’ teaching performance.
AG
A GA
A K
KHHA
ANN FFO
OUUN
NDDAATTIIO
ONN || C
CL A S S R O O M
M G
GUUIIDDEE 03
4
How can this guide be contextualised?
One of the most critical steps in contextualizing this guide is generating contextually relevant
values, attitudes and practices for the indicators under each of these dimensions. This does
not only include assessing current values, attitudes and practices, but also understanding what
you would like to see for your classrooms and students in the future – in other words, those
behaviours you want to see.
Below are steps we recommend be taken into consideration when adapting this guide. They
are based on AKF’s own experiences:
1. Engage the right stakeholders. Depending on how the guide will be introduced or rolled
out, it is critical to engage the relevant stakeholders, such as teachers, school heads and
educators.
3. Revise the indicators under each dimension. Review the elements included under
each dimension, revise and adapt the existing ones and add to them if there are aspects
that are not reflected based on your definitions.
4. Think about what this looks like in your context. Identify contextually relevant
behaviours, practices, or markers of each dimension that reflect your new definitions.
Working with your stakeholders, brainstorm behavioural markers that will help teachers
and mentors/educators anchor the indicators to what they can see in a classroom. This
could be thought about in terms of what an “ideal” classroom looks like and what kinds of
things you want to avoid. For example, what does “respect” look like between teacher and
child or between students?
This process is particularly helpful if the guide is used as a professional development tool. Not
all of the ten dimensions need additional contextualized behavioural markers, but expression
of positive affect, for example, can be displayed in many different ways. It is important to get
these behaviours “right” for the context.
3. Observable indicators
How do we observe for these dimensions in a classroom?
The following set of Observable Indicators provide an approach to examining these ten
dimensions in the classroom. Included are a set of indicators - or descriptors - for each
dimension which can be reasonably demonstrated within a classroom environment and
through the course of a given lesson or series of lessons.
While the indicators mainly refer to the actual delivery of the lesson, they also include
assessment and evaluation elements. Moreover, they all have underlying planning
dimensions. It is recommended that the observer or mentor have the lesson plan before them
while observing a lesson to enable effective reflection and dialogue as soon as possible after
the completion of the lesson.
Following the indicators are a set of suggested questions to support teachers’ professional
development through ‘development dialogues’. These questions are intended to be a starting
point for reflection and self-guided inquiry on one’s teaching practices and strategies to better
highlight the dimensions included in this guide. The suggested questions should be used if the
guide is used as professional development tool between a mentor or observer and a teacher.
During the development dialogues, the mentor is advised to encourage the teacher to analyse
the preparation and delivery of the lesson, beginning the conversation first with a
self-assessment. Reflecting back the observations in a helpful manner will enable teachers to
grow in confidence and develop a dialogue to improve teaching practice. In general, mentors
should aim for open-ended questions that encourage reflection. Mentors might also consider
meeting with the teacher prior to the lesson to better understand the lesson design and
purpose before observation.
1. How do you know the objectives or expected learning outcomes were achieved?
What helped students understand the purpose of the lesson?
How can you make the purpose more explicit?
4. Is there a way the activities could have been designed or linked better?
How did your lesson end? Is there a way you can bring students together at the end?
5. Is there a way you could have used the classroom space better?
1. How do you think you related to your students? What did you do well, and how do you know?
What could you have done better? What do you need to be more effective to better enable students’
learning?
2. What strategies did you use to foster positive interactions with your students and positive interactions
among students? How well do the students relate to each other? How can you better enable this?
3. What do you think makes students enjoy your lesson? What could you have done better?
4. How do you make your classroom more inclusive with regard to students from different backgrounds,
cultures, languages, religions/sects, gender, abilities etc?
How would you describe the social dynamics of your classroom?
1. How do you assess students’ learning? Are there other methods you can use?
5. What records do you keep of students’ learning? What else can you do?
Aga Khan Foundation Pakistan. RCC: Classroom Observation Tool. Pakistan: AKF(P).
Association for Childhood Education International (ACEI). ACEI Global Guidelines Assessment
(GGA) An Early Childhood Care and Education Program Assessment. Washington: ACEI, 2011.
Bennet, T. Creating a Culture: How school leaders can optimize behaviour, Independent review
of behaviour in schools. Department for Education: London, 2017.
British Council. Teaching for Success - Continuous Professional Development (CPD) Framework
for Teachers. London: British Council, 2016.
Bruns et al. RISE Working Paper: Measures of effective teaching in developing countries, 2016
Hamre, Bridget and Robert Pianta. “Early Teacher–Child Relationships and the Trajectory of
Children's School Outcomes through Eighth Grade.” Child Development 72 (2001): 625-638.
Hattie, John. Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement.
New York: Routledge, 2009.
Husbands, C. and Jo Pearce. What makes great pedagogy? Nine claims from research,
National College for School Leadership: Nottingham, U.K., 2012
McKinsey, and Company. How to improve student educational outcomes: new insights from
data analytics. McKinsey and Company, 2017.
OECD. Learning Framework 2030: The future of education and skills. Paris: OECD, 2018.
Pintrich, Paul. “The role of metacognitive knowledge in teaching, learning and assessing.”
Theory into Practice 41:4 (2002) 219-225.
The World Bank Group. Teach: Observer Manual (English). Washington, D.C.: World Bank
Group, 2018.
United Kingdom Department for Education. Standards for teachers’ professional development.
UK: Crown, 2016.
United Kingdom Department for Education. Teachers’ Standards: Overview. UK: Crown, 2011.
The Aga Khan Foundation brings together human, financial and technical resources to address some of the
challenges faced by the poorest and most marginalised communities in the world. Special emphasis is placed
on investing in human potential, expanding opportunity and improving the overall quality of life, especially for
women and girls. It works primarily in six areas: Agriculture and Food Security; Economic Inclusion; Education;
Early Childhood Development; Health and Nutrition; and Civil Society.
For over 100 years the Aga Khan Development Network (AKDN) has worked to ensure that students of all ages
have access to quality learning opportunities. The Network operates programmes and institutions that span the
educational ladder, from early childhood programmes to primary and secondary schools, from vocational
studies for youth and adults to university degrees and continuing professional development. Each year, the
AKDN reaches 2 million learners across 16 countries.