INSO Key Final Version
INSO Key Final Version
INSO Key Final Version
SOLUTION OF
PREPARATORY PROBLEMS
for the
First International Nuclear Science Olympiad
(1st INSO)
____________________________________
Solution of 1st INSO Preparatory Problems
PREFACE
We are pleased to present the solution of preparatory problems for the first
International Nuclear Science Olympiad (INSO). The solution has been prepared
by the INSO International Jury, a distinguished panel of experts from eight
countries, organized by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
We hope that this booklet can aid you in delving into the core principles and
applications of nuclear science. Approach each question with curiosity and
determination. These problems go beyond mere assessments, aiming to inspire
creative thinking and a nuanced understanding of nuclear science concepts. This
preparatory experience aims to both challenge and inspire, fostering a deeper
appreciation for the complexities of atomic and subatomic phenomena.
We hope for your successful preparation for the competition and may your INSO
experience inspire a lifelong passion for the captivating world of nuclear science.
ii
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q1-1
Q1
Q1. CREATION OF NEW PARTICLES (10 pts)
Part 1. Total Energy E (0.5 pts)
1. 𝐸 = 𝐾 + 𝑚𝑐 ! 0.5 pts
2.
Hence 𝐸 ! = 𝑝! 𝑐 ! + 𝑚! 𝑐 "
3.
You might think that the creation of a new product particle, nine times more massive than in a
previous experiment, would require just nine times more energy for the incident proton.
Unfortunately not all of the kinetic energy K of the incoming proton is available to create the
product particle, since conservation of momentum requires that after the collision the system
as a whole still must have some kinetic energy. Only a fraction of the energy of the incident
particle is thus available to create a new particle.
Solving the problem, we will use a relativistic expression for the relationship between the
total energy of the incident proton 𝐸 and its linear momentum 𝑝 because accelerators of any
type make particles moving at very high speeds. The mass of the proton is denoted as 𝑚# . For
two colliding protons as the system, where one of the particles is initially at rest, before the
collision we have:
1
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q1-2
𝐸$ = 𝐾 + 𝑚# 𝑐 ! 𝐸! = 𝑚# 𝑐 !
Q1
𝐸$! = 𝑝$! 𝑐 ! + 𝑚#! 𝑐 " 𝑝! = 0
By conservation of momentum 𝑝$ = 𝑝%
The last two equations give energy available to create a product particle as
𝐾
𝑀𝑐 ! = 2𝑚# 𝑐 ! .1 +
2𝑚# 𝑐 !
From this result, when the kinetic energy K of the incident proton is large compared to its rest
!
energy 𝑚# 𝑐 ! , we see that 𝑀 approaches,2𝑚# 𝐾-" /𝑐.
Thus if the energy of the incoming proton is increased by a factor of nine, the mass you can
create increases only by a factor of three.
3. Thus if the energy of the incoming proton is increased by a factor 4.0 pts
of nine, the mass you can create increases only by a factor of three.
2
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q1-3
4.
This disappointing result is the main reason that most modern accelerators, such as those at
CERN (in Europe), at Fermilab (near Chicago), at SLAC (at Stanford), and at DESY (in
Germany), use colliding beams. Here the total momentum of a pair of interacting particles
can be zero. The center of mass can be at rest after the collision, so in principle all of the
initial kinetic energy can be used for particle creation, according to
𝐾 𝐾 𝐾
𝑀𝑐 ! = 𝑚𝑐 ! + + 𝑚𝑐 ! + = 2𝑚𝑐 ! + 𝐾 = 2𝑚𝑐 ! 11 + 2
2 2 2𝑚𝑐 !
where 𝐾 is the total kinetic energy of two identical colliding particles. Here if 𝐾 ≫ 𝑚𝑐 ! , we
have 𝑀 directly proportional to 𝐾, as we would desire.
These machines are difficult to build and to operate, but they open new vistas in physics.
5.
Efficiency is estimated as a ratio of the consumed energy and the energy pumped into a
device. This ratio is higher for the collider.
3
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q2-1
Q2. CRITICALITY OF A REACTOR (10 pts)
1. Total energy is equal to kinetic energy plus rest mass energy.
Total Production Rate
k=
Total Consumption Rate (𝐿𝑒𝑎𝑘𝑎𝑔𝑒 + 𝐴𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜)
𝑣S% f 𝑣S%
k= =
𝐷𝐵! f + S& f 𝐷𝐵! + S&
2.
30´19.1´0.6022´10!" 𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠
N( !()
'!𝑈) = = 0.014680683731´ 10!"
100´235.0439 𝑐𝑚(
!! (
= 1.4680683731´10 𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠/𝑐𝑚
70´19.1´0.6022´10!" 𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠
N( !(*
'!𝑈) = = 0.03382225´10!"
100´238.0508 𝑐𝑚(
𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠
= 3.382225´10!!
𝑐𝑚(
2. N( !()
'!𝑈) = 1.468´10
!!
𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠/𝑐𝑚( 2.0 pts
N( !(* !!
'!𝑈) == 3.38´10 𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠/𝑐𝑚
(
3.
1 1 1
D= = = = 1.000394 𝑐𝑚
3S+, 3[0.01468´6.8 + 0.0338´6.9] 0.999606
p 3.1415
B= = = 0.031415 𝑐𝑚-$
𝑅 100
!()
S% = !()
(𝑁𝜎% ) = 0.01468´1.4 = 0.020552 𝑐𝑚-$
S& = !()
(𝑁s& ) + !(*(𝑁s& )
!()
2.6´0.020552 0.0534352
𝑘= = = 1.57936
(1.000394)(0.031415) + 0.0328461 0. .338334
!
!(*
S% = 0.0338´0.095 = 3.2131´ 10-( 𝑐𝑚-$
4
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q2-2
!()/!(*
2.6(0.020552 + 0.003431 0.061789295
𝑘= = = 1.82628
0.0338334 0. .338334
!()
3. !()/!(*
𝑘 = 1.579 2.0 pts
𝑘 = 1.826
4.
Total Energy = 𝑇𝐸 = 𝐸0 + 𝑘𝐸0 + 𝑘 ! 𝐸0 + ⋯ + 𝑘 1 𝐸0 = (1 + 𝑘 + 𝑘 ! + ⋯ + 𝑘 1 )𝐸0
𝑘 1/$ − 1
= 𝐸0 n p
𝑘−1
𝑘 1-2/$ − 1
(n
Energy in first − m) fissions = 𝐸0 n p
𝑘−1
𝑘 1/$ − 1 𝑘 1-2/$ − 1
Energy in final m fission events = 𝐸0 s − t
𝑘−1 𝑘−1
𝑘 1/$ − 1 − 𝑘 1-2/$ + 1
Energy in final m fission events = 𝐸0 s t
𝑘−1
𝑘 1/$ − 𝑘 1-2/$
𝐹2 = Fraction of energy in final m generations = 𝐸0 s t
𝑘 1/$ − 1
5.
$-3 #$
If n is large 𝐹 = 𝐹2 = 𝐸0 w$-$/3 %&! x
$
Now if 𝑘 > 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛 → ∞, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑛 (3 %&! ) → 0
𝐹 = 1 − 𝑘 -2
Now if 𝐹 = 99.9% = 0.999
0.999 = 1 − 𝑘 -2
𝑘 -2 = 0.001
Taking log on both sides
− ln(0.001) 6.90777 6.90777
𝑚= = = = 11.469 ≈ 12
ln(𝑘) ln(1.82628) 0.60228
It means that 99.9% of the energy is released in 12´ 10-* seconds.
5. 𝑚 = 12 2.5 pts
12´ 10-* seconds
5
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q3-1
1. 1.0 pts
CM Frame of Reference
Center of mass moves with a speed of
𝑚# 𝑣#
v!" =
𝑚# + 𝑀$
𝑚! 𝑀$ Θ
Center of 𝑚! 𝑉! = 𝑣! − v"#
mass point 𝑚! 𝑉! = 𝑚! 𝑉$
6
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q3-2
THEORY
2.
𝑚$ 𝑣$
𝑣52 =
𝑚$ + 𝑀!
••⃗$ = 𝑣⃗$ − 𝑣⃗52
⋁
•⃗! = −𝑣⃗52
⋁
𝑣$ is the speed of neutron in the Lab frame of reference before the collision.
𝑣52 is the speed of the center of mass in the Lab frame of reference
⋁$ is the speed of neutron in the CM frame of reference before and after the
collision.
⋁! is the speed of nucleus in the CM frame of reference before and after the
collision.
3.
The total momentum in the CM frame of reference before and after the collision is zero.
i.e., 𝑚$ ••⃗ ••⃗! = 0.
⋁$ + 𝑀! ⋁
3. The total momentum in the CM frame of reference before and after 0.5 pts
the collision is zero
4.
Let us see the velocity of the neutron in both the frames of reference as seen in the Lab
Frame as shown in figure below
𝜃!
Θ
v! 𝑠𝑖𝑛Θ
v! v!"
Θ
v! 𝑐𝑜𝑠Θ v#$
7
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q3-3
THEORY
$
Kinetic Energy of the neutron after collision = 𝐸$6 = ! 𝑚$ (𝑣$6 )!
From part (4)
(𝑣$6 )! = ⋁$! + v78
!
+ 2⋁$ 𝑣52 cos Θ
As we know that ⋁$ = 𝑣$ − 𝑣52
(𝑣$6 )! = (𝑣$ − 𝑣52 )! + v78
!
+ 2(𝑣$ − 𝑣52 )𝑣52 cos Θ
!
𝑣52 ! v78 𝑣52 𝑣52
(𝑣$6 )! = 𝑣$! s11 − 2 + ! + 2 11 − 21 2 cos Θt
𝑣$ 𝑣$ 𝑣$ 𝑣$
Also we know that
𝑚$ 𝑣$
𝑣52 =
𝑚$ + 𝑀!
𝑣52 𝑚$ 1 1
= = =
𝑣$ 𝑚$ + 𝑀! 1 + 𝑀! 1 + 𝐴
𝑚$
So
1 ! 1 ! 1 1
(𝑣$6 )! = 𝑣$! s11 − 2 +1 2 + 2 11 − 21 2 cos Θt
1+𝐴 1+𝐴 1+𝐴 1+𝐴
𝐴! + 1 + 2𝐴 cos Θ
(𝑣$6 )! = 𝑣$! s t
(1 + 𝐴)!
Kinetic Energy of the neutron after collision is given by
6
1 6 !
1 !
𝐴! + 2𝐴 cos Θ + 1
𝐸$ = 𝑚$ (𝑣$ ) = 𝑚$ 𝑣$ s t
2 2 (1 + 𝐴)!
𝐴! + 2𝐴 cos Θ + 1
𝐸$6 = 𝐸$ s t
(1 + 𝐴)!
𝐸$6 𝐴! + 2𝐴 cos Θ + 1
=s t
𝐸$ (1 + 𝐴)!
9!' 9' =" /!=/$
Maximum ratio 9!
occurs at Θ = 0; 9! „ =w ($/=)"
x=1
! :;<
8
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q3-4
THEORY
6.
We need to find the energy of the scatted neutron in the laboratory frame of reference. From
the figure in part (v) we can write
𝜃!
Θ
v! 𝑠𝑖𝑛Θ
v! v!"
Θ
v! 𝑐𝑜𝑠Θ v#$
9' $ $/=
or cos Θ = n‹9! cos 𝜃$ − $/=p Œ =
•
!
=" /!= 7AB :/$
Using it in equation 𝐸$6 = 𝐸$ w ($/=)"
x after some simplifications one gets
⎡2 𝐸6
𝐸 cos 𝜃$ + (𝐴 − 1)⎤
‹ $
= 𝐸$ ⎢
𝐸$6 $ ⎥
⎢ (1 + 𝐴) ⎥
⎣ ⎦
6 6
(1 + 𝐴)𝐸$ − 2”𝐸$ 𝐸$ cos 𝜃$ − (𝐴 − 1)𝐸$ = 0
6 ”𝐸$ cos 𝜃$ ± ”𝐸$ cos ! 𝜃$ + (𝐴 + 1)(𝐴 − 1)
”𝐸$ =
(1 + 𝐴)
After simplifications
9
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q3-5
𝐸$ !
𝐸$6 = wcos 𝜃$ + ”A ! − sin! 𝜃 x
$
(1 + 𝐴)!
For 𝜃$ = 45° 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐴 = 2
1 𝑀𝑒𝑉 !
𝐸$6 = wcos 45° + ”4 − sin! 45° x = 0.7384 𝑀𝑒𝑉
9
10
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q4-1
THEORY
2.
Mirror nuclei have the same value of 𝐴 but interchanged values for N, Z. The only terms
in the SEMF which survive when taking the mass difference between mirror nuclei are
K"
the 𝑍𝑚D 𝑐 ! , 𝑁𝑚1 𝑐 ! and 𝑎5 ! .
=(
∆𝑚𝑐 ! = [𝑚( $$)𝐵 ) − 𝑚( $$L𝐶 )]𝑐 !
(𝑍$! − 𝑍!! )
= (𝑍$ − 𝑍! )𝑚D 𝑐 ! + (𝑁$ − 𝑁! )𝑚1 𝑐 ! + 𝑎5 $
𝐴(
Using given values of Z and masses gives ∆𝑚𝑐 ! = −2.66 MeV
Difference shows $$)𝐵 more stable than $$L𝐶 .
It means that $$L𝐶 will decay to $$)𝐵 by β+ emission
2. Using given values of Z and masses gives ∆𝑚𝑐 ! = −2.66 MeV 1.5 pts
Difference shows $$)𝐵 more stable than $$L𝐶 .
It means that $$L𝐶 will decay to $$)𝐵 by β+ emission
3.
Under the condition of 𝑍 = 𝑁, the binding energy per nucleon is given by
𝐵 $ 𝑎5 !
= 𝑎E − 𝑎F 𝐴 - ( − 𝐴 (
𝐴 4
=
Where 𝑍 = ! has been used for the third term and the fourth term does not appear due to 𝑍 =
𝑁. As long as 𝐴 is small, the second term is dominantly increasing with increasing 𝐴, and it is
eventually taken over by the third term which is decreasing. Therefore, the extermal
corresponds to the maximum of 𝐵/𝐴. One can explicitly carry out
𝑑(𝐵/𝐴)
=0
𝑑𝐴
to find the following condition,
𝑎F - " 𝑎5 - $
𝐴 (− 𝐴 (=0
3 6
11
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q4-2
The solution is
2𝑎F
𝐴=
𝑎5
From the given numerical values, 𝐴 = 50 (which must be an integer) is concluded.
Note: In reality 𝐵/𝐴 has a maximum for 𝐴 ranging from 56Fe to 62Ni. The discrepancy from
the answer in this problem is understood by the approximation of dropping the pairing energy
and disregarding a mass difference between the proton and the neutron.
3. 𝐴 = 50 1.5 pts
4.
Take the differentiation of (𝑍, 𝐴 − 𝑍)/𝐴 with respect to 𝑍 for a fixed 𝐴, which leads to
𝑍∗ 2𝑍 ∗ − 𝐴
−2𝑎5 $ − 4𝑎FG2 =0
𝐴
𝐴 (
By solving this in terms of 𝑍 ∗ , one finds
1 𝐴
𝑍∗ = !2
𝑎
1 + 4𝑎 5 𝐴(
FG2
From this expression one can understand that 𝑍∗ ≃ 𝑁 as long as 𝐴 is small enough, while 𝑍∗
becomes far smaller than 𝑁 for large 𝐴. It is obvious from the explicit form that the symmetry
energy tends to favor 𝑍 = 𝑁 but the Coulomb interaction tends to favor 𝑍 → 0, and the
balance between these competing effects determines 𝑍∗. Nuclei with too many neutrons
(protons) would go through the 𝛽− decay (the 𝛽+ decay or the electron capture) toward the
stable (𝑍, 𝑁).
For A=197, 𝑍∗ = 79.
5.
Fission process total nucleons remain the same. Terms dependent on A only will not
contribute.
∆𝑚𝑐 ! = [𝑚( !(* $$'
'!U) − 𝑚( "L𝑃𝑑 )]𝑐
!
𝐵( !(*
'!U)
= 𝑍𝑚D 𝑐 ! + 𝑁𝑚1 𝑐 ! −
𝑐!
! !
𝐵( $$'
"LPd)
− 2 n𝑍$ 𝑚D 𝑐 + 𝑁$ 𝑚1 𝑐 − p
𝑐!
In symmetric fission Z1=Z/2 and N1=N/2. Therefore using the SEMF.
12
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q4-3
THEORY
!
𝐵( $$'
"LPd) 𝐵( !(*
'!U)
∆𝑚𝑐 = 2 !
−
𝑐 𝑐!
= 2(1856.4 – 416.13 – 301.13 – 142.74
+ 0)– (3712.8 – 660.56 – 956.05 – 285.47 + 0.77)
= 181𝑀𝑒𝑉
5. Fission products are often unstable as you have gone from a heavy 1.5 pts
nucleus where the most stable configuration favours a large neutron
excess, to a lighter nucleus where the most stable configuration has
smaller (or zero) neutron excess. Therefore the fission fragments
tend to have an excess of neutrons compared to the stable
configuration and are unstable
6.
The expression for the binding energy per
𝐵 -
$ 𝑍! (𝐴 − 2𝑍)!
= 𝑎E − 𝑎F 𝐴 − 𝑎5 " − 𝑎FG2
(
𝐴 𝐴!
𝐴(
As A is very large the surface and coulomb terms are negligible. The B/A is determined by
the difference between the volume term and the asymmetry term. The latter approaches if we
assume the star is dominantly neutrons i.e. A>>Z
𝐵
= 𝑎E − 𝑎FG2 = 15.6 − 23.3 = −7.7 𝑀𝑒𝑉
𝐴
The expression is negative implying the system is unbound. Therefore to bind a star other
forces contribute.
7.
The expression apart from the parametric dependence on 𝐴 can be identified as
3𝐺𝑚1!
𝑎N,&E =
5𝑅<
which is re-expressed in terms of 𝑀𝑃 using the given relation to 𝐺, leading to
3ℏ𝑐 𝑚1!
𝑎N,&E =
5𝑅< 𝑀O!
3 197 𝑓𝑚 ⋅ 𝑀𝑒𝑉 × (939 𝑀𝑒𝑉/𝑐 ! )!
𝑎N,&E = ≈ 6.4 × 10-(P 𝑀𝑒𝑉
5 1.1 𝑓𝑚 × (1.22 × 1022 𝑀𝑒𝑉/𝑐 ! )!
The stability is judged from the condition that the binding energy should be positive, i.e.
)
𝐵(𝐴) = 𝑎E 𝐴 − 𝑎FG2 𝐴 + 𝑎N,&E 𝐴( > 0
This inequality can be translated into 𝐴 > 𝐴𝑐 with 𝐴𝑐 given by
13
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q4-4
(/!
𝑎E − 𝑎FG2
𝐴5 = n p ≅ 4.4 × 10))
𝑎N,&E
14
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q5-1
Q5. RADIOACTIVE DATING (10 pts)
Part 1. Naturally Occurring Uranium
1.1
Suppose that we have one gram of natural Uranium
Amount of !()
'!𝑈 in one gram of natural uranium=0.007 gram
Amount of !(*
'!𝑈 in one gram of natural uranium=0.993 gram
No of Atoms of !()
'!𝑈 : No of Atoms of !(*
'!𝑈
0.007 0.993
NQ ∶ N
235 238 Q
1 ∶ 140
1.2
"()
𝑛!() (𝑡) = 𝑛<!() 𝑒 -R +
"(*
𝑛!(* (𝑡) = 𝑛<!(* 𝑒 -R +
ln 2
𝜆!() = !() = 9.72 × 10-$< 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 -$
𝑇$
!
ln 2
𝜆!(* = !(* = 1.54 × 10-$< 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 -$
𝑇$
!
𝑛!(* (𝑡) 𝑛<!(* SR"() -R"(*T+
= 𝑒
𝑛!() (𝑡) 𝑛<!()
It is given that initially 𝑛<!(* = 𝑛<!()
"() "(*
140 = 𝑒 SR -R T+
1
𝑡 = !() ln(140)
(𝜆 − 𝜆!(* )
𝑡 = 6.04´10' years
15
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q5-2
1.3
!()
𝑇$/! = 7.13 × 10* 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
ln 2
𝜆!() = !() = 9.72 × 10-$< 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 -$
𝑇$
!
!(*
𝑇$/! = 4.51 × 10' 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
ln 2
𝜆!(* = !(* = 1.54 × 10-$< 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟 -$
𝑇$
!
"()
𝑛!() (𝑡) = 𝑛<!() 𝑒 -R +
"(*
𝑛!(* (𝑡) = 𝑛<!(* 𝑒 -R +
At 𝑡 = 0, isotopic abundance of 𝑈 !() = 0.03 = 𝛾!()
Since 𝑛!() 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑛!(* ≫ 𝑛!("
𝑛<!() 𝑛<!()
𝛾!() = = = 0.03
𝑛<!() + 𝑛<!(" + 𝑛<!(* 𝑛<!() + 𝑛<!(*
0.97𝑛<!() = 0.03𝑛<!(*
1+"() <.<(
1+"(*
= <.'P = 0.03093 at 𝑡 = 0
1"()
Presently 𝛾!() = 0.0072 = 1"() /1"(*
0.9928𝑛!() = 0.0072𝑛!(*
𝑛!(* 0.9928 1
!()
= =
𝑛 0.0072 0.00725
Dividing the two decay equations
𝑛!() (𝑡) 𝑛<!() SR"(* -R"()T+
= 𝑒
𝑛!(* (𝑡) 𝑛<!(*
1 0.00725
𝑡= ln 1 2
(1.54 × 10-$< − 9.72 × 10-$< ) 0.03093
𝑡 = 1.77 × 10' 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠
16
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q5-3
Part 2. Radioactive tracer
2.1
17
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q6-1
Q6. RADIOACTIVE EQUILIBRIUM (10 pts)
1.
1. 1.0 pts
2.
𝜆$
𝑅= ,𝑒 -R! + − 𝑒 -R" + -
𝜆! − 𝜆$
For small values of 𝒕, 𝑒 -R! + = 1 − 𝜆$ 𝑡 + ⋯ 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑒 -R" + = 1 − 𝜆! 𝑡 + ⋯
𝜆$
𝑅= [1 − 𝜆$ 𝑡 + ⋯ − (1 − 𝜆! 𝑡 + ⋯ )]
𝜆! − 𝜆$
𝜆$
𝑅= [(𝜆 − 𝜆$ )𝑡 + ⋯ ] ≈ 𝜆$ 𝑡
𝜆! − 𝜆$ !
For large values of 𝒕, and𝜆! ≫ 𝜆$ , the second exponential term can be neglected,
then
𝜆$ 𝜆$
𝑅= 𝑒 -R! + ≈ 𝑒 -R! +
𝜆! − 𝜆$ 𝜆!
2. 𝑅 ≈ 𝜆$ 𝑡 2.0 pts
𝜆$
𝑅 ≈ 𝑒 -R! +
𝜆!
18
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q6-2
3.
For small values of 𝒕, 𝑅 ≈ 𝜆$ 𝑡
Plot 𝑅 against 𝑡 for small 𝑡, (in the region where 𝑒 -R+ = 1 − 𝜆𝑡). This will be a
straight line with slope 𝜆$ . Hence 𝜆$ can be measured by the slope of the straight
line.
For large values of 𝒕,
𝜆$
𝑅= 𝑒 -R! +
𝜆! − 𝜆$
By taking log on both sides
𝜆$
ln 𝑅 = ln − 𝜆$ 𝑡
𝜆! − 𝜆$
Plotln 𝑅 against 𝑡 for large values 𝑡, (in the region where 𝑒 -R! + ≫ 𝑒 -R" + ). This
R!
will be a straight line with slope 𝜆$ and intercept ln R -R . 𝜆$ has already been
" !
determined, 𝜆! can be determined from the intercept as follows
𝜆$
𝑘 = ln
𝜆! − 𝜆$
By taking anti-log on both sides
𝜆$
= 𝑒3
𝜆! − 𝜆$
𝜆! = 𝜆$ (1 + 𝑒 -3 )
4.
As we have
𝑁! (𝑡) 𝜆$
𝑅= = ,𝑒 -R! + − 𝑒 -R" + -
𝑁< 𝜆! − 𝜆$
Also
𝑁$ (𝑡) = 𝑁< 𝑒 -R! +
For 𝜆! ≫ 𝜆$ and 𝑒 -R! + ≫ 𝑒 -R" + (after suitable long times) we get
𝑁! 𝜆$ 𝜆$
= =
𝑁$ 𝜆! − 𝜆$ 𝜆!
This implies that
𝑁! 𝜆! = 𝑁$ 𝜆$
Conditions for validity are 𝜆! ≫ 𝜆$ and 𝑒 -R! + ≫ 𝑒 -R" + .
19
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q6-3
5.
𝑁( (𝑡) = 𝑁< − 𝑁$ (𝑡) − 𝑁! (𝑡)
𝜆$
𝑁( (𝑡) = 𝑁< − 𝑁< 𝑒 -R! + − 𝑁 ,𝑒 -R! + − 𝑒 -R" + -
𝜆! − 𝜆$ <
,𝜆! 𝑁< 𝑒 -R! + − 𝜆$ 𝑁< 𝑒 -R! + + 𝜆$ 𝑁< 𝑒 -R! + − 𝜆$ 𝑁< 𝑒 -R" + -
𝑁( (𝑡) = 𝑁< −
𝜆! − 𝜆$
-R +
,𝜆! 𝑒 ! − 𝜆$ 𝑒 -R" + -
𝑁( (𝑡) = 𝑁< − 𝑁<
𝜆! − 𝜆$
20
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q7-1
Q7. RADIOACTIVITY AS SOURCE OF HEAT (10 pts)
1. Total energy is equal to.
2.
Conservation of momentum gives
𝑚Y 𝑣Y − 𝑚Z 𝑣Z = 0
This equation gives
𝑚Z 𝑣Z
𝑣Y =
𝑚Y
$
Kinetic Energy of the Daughter Nucleus i.e., ( *!𝑃𝑏) = 𝐾Z = ! 𝑚Z 𝑣Z!
!<L
$ $ 2 - E- ! 2-
Kinetic Energy of the Alpha Particle =𝐾Y = ! 𝑚Y 𝑣Y! = ! 𝑚Y Œ 2.
• = 2.
𝐾Z
2 2
Q value= Total Kinetic Energy=𝐾Y + 𝐾Z = 𝐾Y + 2 . 𝐾Y = 𝐾Y Œ1 + 2 . •
- -
𝑄
𝐾Y = 𝑚
Œ1 + 𝑚Y •
Z
By putting the corresponding values one gets
5.403
𝐾Y = = 5.3 𝑀𝑒𝑉
4.0026
Œ1 + 205.97447•
The kinetic energy of the daughter is given by
𝐾Z = 𝑄 − 𝐾Y = 0.103 𝑀𝑒𝑉
3.
$
The average/mean life time=𝜏 = R where 𝜆 is decay constant.
21
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q7-2
THEORY
H $.<×$<#,
Where 𝑁< = !<'.'*!*P 𝑁= = Œ!<'.'*!*P• × 6.022 × 10!( = 2.8678529 ×
10$) 𝐴𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠 (𝑁𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑖) is the initial number of nuclei of !$<
*"𝑃𝑜 .
Total energy released due to decay process during average life time = 𝑄𝑁
𝑄𝑁 = 5.403 × 1.812797 × 10$) = 9.79454 × 10$) 𝑀𝑒𝑉
= 9.79454 × 10$) × 1.602 × 10-$( 𝐽 = 1.569 𝐾𝐽
4.
).(×$<, IJ (.P×$<!+ [\F\1+IN,&+\]1F/F $.L<!×$<#!/ _
Energy released per unit activity= [\F\1+IN,&+\]1 × $ ^\
× $ IJ
=
`
0.0314056 ^\
22
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q8-1
Q8. MODEL OF THE ATOM (10 pts)
Part 1. Plum pudding model of the atom (4.2 pts)
1.1 Since we are considering the “plum pudding” model for hydrogen atom,
Z =1.
I (I
Therefore, nuclear charge dens ity of the positively charged cloud = 0 = "a&(
a& (
(
1.2 Here we are dealing with the characteristics inside the charged cloud and
therefore must concentrate in the region where 𝑟 < 𝑎.
0 (1
$ c a, ( dc d I
( 023(
Electric field at a distance r from the center = "ab ,"
= "ab+ & (
𝑟 Note that
+
this electric field is in the radially outward direction.
1.3 In this case, force acting on the electron is always directed towards the center.
[", I" [", I"
Therefore, 𝑚 [+ " = − "ab &(
𝑟 which leads to [+ " = −𝜔! 𝑟 with 𝜔 = ‹"ae (
+ + 2&
#) 0.4 pts
𝜔 = +$%& +
* '(
23
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q8-2
1.4 Because the Simple Harmonic Motion (SHM) described by the equations in
(iii) above is restricted to the inside of the charge cloud, the amplitude of the SHM
can be considered as 𝑎.
$
∴ Maximum speed = 𝐴𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 × 𝜔 = 𝑒‹"ab
+ 2&
1.5
1.5 The value we get for the maximum speed of a negative charge 0.6 pts
is greater than the speed of light in a vacuum and therefore the
model cannot be correct.
24
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q8-3
2.2 Radius of the "He is given as 1.74 fm. Use this information to find the mass
number of Fe isotope used as the target.
!
$ ".!( = (
Use the equation 𝑅 = 𝑟< 𝐴 g( . ∴ Œ$.P"• = Œ"• 𝐴 = 57
[Note: Depending on the way one does the numerical calculation, he/she might get the
answer as 58, which can also be considered as correct. If A is taken as 58, then the
answers to following (iii), (iv) and (v) must be changed accordingly]
#",
2.4Density of nuclear matter= 𝜌m = 0'.")$'*!×$<
a(".!(×$<#!) )(
~3 × 10$P kg. m-(
(
Densities as high as this can be found in neutron stars.
2.4 𝜌m ~ 3 × 10$P kg. m-( 1.0 pts
Neutron stars (or other acceptable answer) 0.2 pts
2.5
2.5 Positively charged quarks = 83 0.5 pts
25
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q9-1
Q9. H3-DECAY (10 pts)
Part 1. Radioactive decay (6.5 pts)
1.1
1.1 pc : 𝛽,! (Beta particle or electron) 0.25 pts
0.25 pts
pn : 𝜈"! (Anti electron-neutrino)
1.2
1.2 pc (or 𝛽,! ) can be detected easily 0.6 pts
Because pn (or 𝜈"! ) is uncharged particle with almost zero mass. 0.4 pts
1.4
1.4
For indicating the maximum value on the energy axis 0.2 pts
0.3
0.4
1.5 The energy spectrum for alpha particles show discrete peaks 1.0 pts
as opposed to a continuous spectrum similar to the one
depicted in (iv) above.
26
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q9-2
0.5
1.5 Energy of pn = 18.6-16.1 = 2.5 keV 2.0 pts
2.2
To find the initial activity, one must know the number of tritium atoms that exist in the
sample. From the nuclear data sheets, mass of a tritium atom is 3.0160495 u or
5 × 10-!" g.
<.$
Therefore number of tritium atoms in a 0.1 g sample = )×$<#"0 ~2 × 10!!
[Note that you get the same answer by considering the molar mass of tritium which is
3.016 g.]
∴ Initial activity = 2 × 10!! × 1.78 × 10-' s -$ = 3.56 × 10$( Bq
2.3
**
Average energy = L<×L<×(.)L×$<!( J = 6.87 × 10-$L J = 4.3 keV
27
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q10-1
1.2
1.2 Based on the change in energy values, the second process is 0.8 pts
not spontaneous.
# ! # ! 2
1.3 Total K.E. emitted per decay = 𝐸+ = 𝐸Y + 𝐸n = !2.
.
+ !2.
5
= 𝐸Y Œ1 + 2 . •
5
!(*
= 5.5 Œ!("• = 5.6 MeV
[Note that 𝑝Y = 𝑝n , from the conservation of momentum]
28
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q10-2
1.4
Number of atoms in 120 g of !(*Pu = N
$!<
= $.LL<)"×$<#"0 ×!(*.<"'))( = 3.04 × 10!(
[m L*.!
Decay rate = Œ [+ • = ).L×$.L<!$*×$<#!( = 7.60 × 10$( 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦𝑠. s -$
78
c d P.L<$!)×$<!(
Decay constant = 𝜆 = 79
m
= (.<()P"×$<"( = 2.50 × 10-$< 𝑠 -$
<.L'( <.L'(
∴ 𝐻𝑎𝑙𝑓 𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑒 = 𝑡! = R
= !.)<('!×$<#!+ s = 2.77 × 10' s = 87.7 years
"
1.4
Decay constant = 𝜆 = 2.50 × 1013" 𝑠 13 0.6 pts
1.0 pts
Half life = 2.77 × 102 s 𝑜𝑟 87.7 years
2.2
29
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q10-3
Power variation is same as the variation of activity because,
[9 [m
𝑃𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 = [+ = 𝐸+ Œ [+ • = 𝐸+ 𝐴(𝑡) with 𝐸+ constant. Therefore power becomes half
during a period equal to the half-life which is 87.7 years.
2.2
2.3
Because the initial power is sixteen times more than the minimum power required, the
RPS would generate less than the minimum power after four half-lives.
Therefore, lifetime of RPS = 87.7 × 4 = 350 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 !!!!!!!!!!!!!
2.4
Lifetime of the RPS = 4𝑡!
"
o1\+\&p =5+\E\+G
∴Activity at the end of the lifetime of the RPS = $L
!.)×$<#!+ ×!×L.<!×$<"(
= $L
= 1.88 × 10$( Bq
30
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q11-1
= 3.15 × 10"
1.2
(.$)×$<0 ×<.LL!×$.L<!×$<#!( ×!×L<×L<×.<)
Absorbed dose = P)
Gy
1.2 Absorbed dose = 1.6 × 10-* Gy = 1.6 × 10-L rad 0.7 pts
1.3
Absorbed dose = 1.6 × 10-* Gy = 1.6 × 10-L rad
The currently accepted value of quality factor for alpha particles is 20.
Therefore, Dose Equivalent = 3.2 × 10-P Sv = 3.2 × 10-) rem
31
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q11-2
1.3 Absorbed dose = 1.6 × 10-* Gy = 1.6 × 10-L rad 0.4 pts
(.$)×$<0
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = "a×!**
× 10-( × 0.8 counts per second
= 0.007 s-1
This is a very low count rate and cannot be observed due to the typical background
level.
Very small count rate compared to typical background level 0.5 pts
2.2
(.$)×$<0 ×$<#( ×<.*
If this distance is d, "a[ "
= 20, and therefore 𝑑 ≈ 32 cm.
2.3
2.3 This particular radiation detector cannot be used to locate the 0.6 pts
source because the count rates are very low in general and
detector must be at a distance closer than 32 cm to have a
measurable count rate.
32
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q11-3
Required activity for the added tracer = A(0) = 62.8 Bq 0.5 pts
33
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q12-1
Q12 NUCLEAR BINDING ENERGY (10 pts)
Part 1. Nuclear Binding Energy (2.5 pts)
1.1
1.2
1.2 𝐵 = %𝑍𝑚" + 𝑁𝑚# − (𝑚( %X) − 𝑍𝑚! ).𝑐 & 0.8 pts
𝐵 = 1𝑍(𝑚- + 𝑚. ) + 𝑁𝑚/ − 𝑚( 1X)7𝑐 $
𝐵 = [𝑍𝑚( !H) + 𝑁𝑚/ − 𝑚( 1X)]𝑐 $ 0.7 pts
=
For derivation in the form 𝑍 = 3 " 0.8 pts
!/ ( = :(
"30
=
For the derivation final expression 𝑍 = " 0.6 pts
!/<.<$)"= :(
2.2
= $
𝑍~ ! for smaller values of A and therefore gradient of the graph~ !.
$
For larger values of A, gradient < !.
34
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q12-2
2.2
2.3
2.3 If A =125, then Z = 52.4 and therefore most stable isotope is 1.0 pts
)!Te.
2.4
Neutron separation energy (normally represented by the symbol 𝑆1 ) for a nucleus =K𝑋m
is the energy required to remove one neutron from the nucleus. Thus, 𝑆1 is equal to the
difference in binding energies between =K𝑋m and =-$K𝑋m-$ .
Therefore 𝑆1 = 𝐵( =K𝑋m ) − 𝐵( =-$K𝑋m-$ ).
35
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q12-3
Substituting numerical values for e and 𝜀< in the above expression one can find R0 as R0
3.1 Δ𝐵 = 8.21 MeV 1.0 pts
" (()* (
∆𝐸! = #$%& {(20𝑒)# − (19𝑒 )# } = ) 1.0 pts
' ' #$%&' '' (",) +*
36
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q13-1
Q13 RADIATION DETECTION (10 pts)
Part 1. Alpha particle in a magnetic field (6.5 pts)
1.1
!$" !$<
*!Po → *<Pb + "!He
!$" !$<
1.1 *!Po → *<Pb + "!He 0.5 pts
1.2
1.2
For the correct (semicircular to the right side) path as indicated 0.5 pts
1.3
At the minimum energy of not hitting the detector plane, radius of the chamber = twice
the radius of the path.
By equating the magnitude of the centrifugal force to the force due to magnetic field,
2. E " rt0
0
= 𝐵𝑞𝑣, and therefore 𝑣 = 2.
37
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q13-2
1.3 2. E " 0.5 pts
For the equation 0
= 𝐵𝑞𝑣
1.4
From equation (1), it is clear that 𝐸 ∝ 𝑅! for particles with same charge and
mass.
9. ((.!L !
Therefore, 9 = i ().< j and 𝐸Y = 7.68 MeV.
$3>
1.5
!9 !×P.L*×$.L<!×$<#!(
From 𝑣Y = p 2 . = p L.L")×$<#"?
= 1.92 × 10P m s -$ ~ 0.06𝑐
.
1.6
𝐸+ = 𝐸Y + 𝐸Ov
From the conservation of momentum 𝑃s⃗Y + 𝑃s⃗Ov = 0 and therefore, 𝑃Y! = 𝑃Ov
!
O" 2
Using the non-relativistic equation 𝐸 = !2 , we have 𝐸Ov = 2 . 𝐸Y
@A
38
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q13-3
2.2
𝑆𝑎𝑡. 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 3.7 × 10" × 2.26 × 10) × 1.602 × 10-$' A = 1.33 × 10-' A
2.2 𝑆𝑎𝑡. 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡 = 1.33 × 10-' A 1.5 pts
2.3
𝑣\1 = 1.33 × 10-' × 10L = 1.33 × 10-( V
𝑣]w+ = 0.2 V
EBC9
∴ 𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 = E4%
= 150
39
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q14-1
Q14. PHOTON INTENSITY (10 pts)
1.
At each position,
𝐼(𝑥$ ) = 𝐼< 𝑒 -3D u!
𝐼(𝑥! ) = 𝐼(𝑥$ )𝑒 -3E u"
𝐼$ = 𝐼(𝑥! )
𝐼(𝑥" ) = 𝐼$ 𝑒 -3E u0
𝐼(𝑥) ) = 𝐼(𝑥" )𝑒 -3D u)
𝐼! = 𝐼(𝑥) )
Thus, 𝐼$ = 𝐼(𝑥! )
= 𝐼(𝑥$ )𝑒 -3E u"
= 𝐼< 𝑒 -3D u! 𝑒 -3E u"
= 𝐼< exp (−𝑘= 𝑥$ − 𝑘r 𝑥! )…………..….(1)
And 𝐼! = 𝐼(𝑥) )
= 𝐼(𝑥" )𝑒 -3D u)
= 𝐼$ 𝑒 -3E u0 𝑒 -3D u)
= 𝐼$ exp (−𝑘r 𝑥" − 𝑘= 𝑥) )…………….(2)
From (1),
𝐼$
𝐼𝑛 = −𝑘= 𝑥$ − 𝑘r 𝑥!
𝐼<
1 𝐼$ 𝑥!
− 𝐼𝑛 z { = 𝑘= + 𝑘r
𝑥$ 𝐼< 𝑥$
𝐼$
𝑥! 𝐼𝑛 i𝐼< j
𝑘= = −𝑘r −
𝑥$ 𝑥$
F
3E u" /o1c ! d
F+
−𝑘= = [ u!
] ……………………….(3)
40
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q14-2
𝐼! 𝐼$ 𝑥)
𝐼𝑛 z { = −𝑘r 𝑥" + [𝑘r 𝑥! + 𝐼𝑛 z {]
𝐼$ 𝐼< 𝑥$
𝐼! 𝐼$ 𝑥) 𝑘r 𝑥! 𝑥)
𝐼𝑛 z { − 𝐼𝑛 z { = −𝑘r 𝑥" +
𝐼$ 𝐼< 𝑥$ 𝑥$
𝐼 𝐼
𝑥$ 𝐼𝑛 i𝐼! j − 𝑥) 𝐼𝑛 i𝐼$ j 𝑥! 𝑥) − 𝑥$ 𝑥"
$ <
= 𝑘r [ ]
𝑥$ 𝑥$
F F
u! o1c " d- u) o1c ! d
F! F+
𝑘r = u" u) -u! u0
1. 𝐼 𝐼 3.5pts
𝑥" 𝐼𝑛 i < j − 𝑥! 𝐼𝑛 i $ j
𝐼$ 𝐼!
𝑘= =
𝑥$ 𝑥" − 𝑥! 𝑥)
𝐼 𝐼
𝑥$ 𝐼𝑛 i𝐼! j − 𝑥) 𝐼𝑛 i𝐼$ j
$ <
𝑘r =
𝑥! 𝑥) − 𝑥$ 𝑥"
2.
$ o
From 𝐼$ = 𝐼< 𝑒 (-3F xF ) , it is reached that 𝑘o = − x ln o! .
F +
$ o
Similarly, 𝑘oo = − x ln o" .
FF !
41
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q14-3
3.
ln 𝐼$ /𝐼< = ln 1 = 0
% ' (&) % '' (&) % % (&)
Taylor expansion, 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(𝑎) + (𝑥 − 𝑎) + (𝑥 − 𝑎)! + ⋯ + (𝑥 − 𝑎)1
$! !! 1!
From Eq. 1,
o
𝑘= 𝑥$ + 𝑘r 𝑥! = 𝑙𝑛 o+ (Eq. 3)
!
From Eq. 2,
𝐼< 𝐼! 3D [u! -u) ]/3E [u" -u0 ]
! = 𝑒 = 𝑒 3D |u! /3E |u"
𝐼$
42
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q14-4
= (1 + 𝑘= Δ𝑥$ )(1 + 𝑘r Δ𝑥! )
= 1 + 𝑘= 𝑘r Δ𝑥$ Δ𝑥! + 𝑘= Δ𝑥$ + 𝑘r Δ𝑥! ≈ 1 + 𝑘= Δ𝑥$ + 𝑘r Δ𝑥!
Where Δ𝑥$ = 𝑥$ − 𝑥) and |Δ𝑥$ | ≪ 𝑥$ ; and Δ𝑥! = 𝑥! − 𝑥" and |Δ𝑥! | ≪ 𝑥! .
By Taylor expansion to the first order, the above equation is approximated as
I< 𝐼!
= [1 + 𝑘= Δ𝑥$ ][1 + 𝑘r Δ𝑥! ] ≈ 1 + k Q Δx$ + k • x!
I$!
Therefore,
o+ o"
𝑘= Δ𝑥$ + 𝑘r Δ𝑥! ≈ o!"
−1 (Eq. 4)
u $ o
From Eq.3, 𝑘= + 𝑘r u" = u ln o+
! ! !
€u o o $
From Eq. 4, 𝑘= + 𝑘r €u" ≈ ‡ +o"" − 1ˆ €u
! ! !
Thus,
1 𝐼 1 𝐼𝐼
‰𝑥 iln 𝐼< j − Δ𝑥 z <!! − 1{Š
$ $ $ 𝐼$
𝑘r =
𝑥! Δ𝑥!
i𝑥 − Δ𝑥 j
$ $
1 𝐼< 𝑥!
𝑘= = ln − 𝑘r
𝑥$ 𝐼$ 𝑥$
1 𝐼 1 𝐼𝐼
‰𝑥 iln 𝐼< j − Δ𝑥 z <!! − 1{Š
$ $ $ 𝐼$
𝑘r =
𝑥 Δ𝑥
i𝑥! − Δ𝑥! j
$ $
43
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q15-1
2.
Assuming the compound is static before fission, then from momentum conservation,
we have;
𝑚$ 𝑣$ − 𝑚! 𝑣! = 𝑚^m 𝑣^m
Since the compound nucleus is assumed to be static before fission, we can write the
above equation in two ways. The first is that we can write
𝑚$ 𝑣$ − 𝑚! 𝑣! = 0
𝑚$ 𝑣$ = 𝑚! 𝑣!
𝑚$ 𝑣!
=
𝑚! 𝑣$
A different way to express these are
𝑚$ 𝑣$ − 𝑚! 𝑣!
= 𝑣^m
𝑚^m
𝑚$ 𝑣$ − 𝑚! 𝑣!
=0
𝑚^m
𝑚$ 𝑣$ 𝑚! 𝑣!
=
𝑚^m 𝑚^m
𝑚$ 𝑣$ 𝑚! 𝑣!
=
𝑚^m 𝑚$ + 𝑚!
𝑚$ 𝑣$
𝑚^m = (𝑚 + 𝑚! )
𝑚! 𝑣! $
𝑚$
𝑚^m 𝑣! = 𝑚$ 𝑣$ z + 1{
𝑚!
44
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q15-2
Because the ratio of the fragments mass is inverse proportional to the ratio of
fragments velocity,
𝑣!
𝑚^m 𝑣! = 𝑚$ 𝑣$ z + 1{
𝑣$
𝑣! + 𝑣$
𝑚^m 𝑣! = 𝑚$ 𝑣$
𝑣$
𝑚^m 𝑣! = 𝑚$ (𝑣$ + 𝑣! )
𝑣!
𝑚$ = 𝑚^m
𝑣$ + 𝑣!
-!P
1.4516 × 10P 𝑚𝑠 -$
𝑚$ = (236.0 × 1.66 × 10 𝑘𝑔)
0.92716 × 10P 𝑚𝑠 -$ + 1.4516 × 10P 𝑚𝑠 -$
-!P
𝑚$ = (391.76 × 10 𝑘𝑔)(0.6102339)
𝑚$ = 239.065 × 10-!P 𝑘𝑔
1
𝑚$ = 239.065 × 10-!P z × 10!P 𝐷𝑎{
1.66
𝑚$ = 144.015 𝐷𝑎
𝑚$ ≈ 144 𝐷𝑎
3.
1 1
𝐾 = 𝑚$ 𝑣$! + 𝑚$ 𝑣!!
2 2
1
𝐾 = (144.015 × 1.66 × 10-!P 𝑘𝑔)(9.2716 × 10L 𝑚𝑠 -$ )!
2
1
+ (91.985 × 1.66 × 10-!P 𝑘𝑔)(1.4516 × 10P 𝑚𝑠 -$ )!
2
𝐾 = 1.02753 × 10-$$ 𝐽 + 1.60875 × 10-$$ 𝐽
𝐾 = 2.63628 × 10-$$ 𝐽
1 𝑀𝑒𝑉
𝐾 = 2.63628 × 10-$$ ×
1.6 × 10-$(
𝐾 = 164.768 𝑀𝑒𝑉
45
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q15-3
4.
Total excitation energy of the fragments,
𝑇𝑋𝐸 = 𝑄 − 𝐾
𝑇𝑋𝐸 = 190.0 𝑀𝑒𝑉 − 164.768 𝑀𝑒𝑉
𝑇𝑋𝐸 = 25.232 𝑀𝑒𝑉
Neutron separation energy,
𝑆1 = (939.565 𝑀𝑒𝑉/𝑐 ! − 931.494 𝑀𝑒𝑉/𝑐 ! )𝑐 !
𝑆1 = 8.071 𝑀𝑒𝑉
Thus, the maximum possible number of neutron emission are,
𝑇𝑋𝐸 25.232 𝑀𝑒𝑉
𝑀1 = = = 3.126 𝑛𝑒𝑢𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛𝑠
𝑆1 8.071 𝑀𝑒𝑉
5.
5.1
The charge of the first fragment,
𝐴$
𝑍$ = 𝑍^m
𝐴^m
144
𝑍$ = 92
236
𝑍$ = 56.136
𝑍$ ≈ 56
The charge of the second fragment,
𝑍! = 𝑍^m − 𝑍$
𝑍! = 92 − 56
𝑍! = 36
46
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q15-4
5.2
At full acceleration, all the energy from Coulomb repulsion will turn into
kinetic energy, where
𝐸5 = 𝐸3
𝑍$ 𝑍!
1.44 = 164.768 𝑀𝑒𝑉
𝑅
𝑍$ 𝑍!
𝑅 = 1.44
164.768
56(36)
𝑅 = 1.44
164.768
𝑅 = 17.620 𝑓𝑚
5.3
(
Radius of fragment 1, 𝑅$ = 1.2 (‘𝐴$ = 1.2 √144 = 6.290 𝑓𝑚
(
Radius of fragment 2, 𝑅! = 1.2 (‘𝐴! = 1.2 √92 = 5.417 𝑓𝑚
Since the radius between fragments at full acceleration is 17.620 fm, the
distance between the fragment surface is 5.913 fm.
5.3 The distance between the fragment surface is 5.913 fm. 1.0 pts
47
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q16-1
Q16. FISSION PRODUCT (Sm-157) (10 pts)
1.
$<< k•/8(
Rate of fission = (.$×$<#!( _
= 3.2258 × 10!< fission s-1 m-3
2.
The production rate of Eu-157,
𝑑𝐶$
= 𝜆< 𝐶< − 𝜆$ 𝐶$
𝑑𝑡
Where 𝜆$ is the decay constant of Eu-157. The half-life of Eu-157 is 15.2 hours, we
p1!
can express its decay constant as 𝜆$ = )"P!< F = 1.267 × 10-) 𝑠 -$
3.
Because Gd-157 is a neutron absorber, the rate of consumption is the reaction rate of
Gd-157,
48
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q16-2
𝑅 = Σ& Φ
𝑅 = 𝑛𝜎& Φ
Where 𝜎& Φ = 240000 (1 × 10-!" 𝑐𝑚! ) × (7.5 × 10$! 𝑛 𝑐𝑚-! 𝑠 -$ ) = (1.8 ×
10-L )𝑛 𝑠 -$ , thus,
𝑅 = 𝑛(1.8 × 10-L )𝑠 -$
We know 𝑛 = 𝐶! (𝑡), hence,
𝑑𝐶!
= −𝐶! 𝜎& Φ
𝑑𝑡
Thus, we may write the full governing differential equation as,
𝑑𝐶!
= 𝜆$ 𝐶$ − 𝐶! 𝜎& Φ
𝑑𝑡
Giving us ,
𝜆$ 𝐶$ (1.267 × 10-) )(6.950 × 10!< )
𝐶! (𝑡) = = = 4.892 × 10!$
𝜎& Φ (1.8 × 10-L )
4.
At steady state before shutdown, we can calculate that,
𝐶! (𝑡 = 0) = 4.892 × 10!$ .
After shutting down for 14 days=1,209,600 seconds, only the decay component
contributes to the population of Gd-157,
𝑑𝐶!
= −𝐶! 𝜎& Φ
𝑑𝑡
𝐶! (𝑡) = −𝐶! (0) 𝑒 -‚3 ƒ+
#, T+ +
𝐶! (𝑡) = −(4.892 × 10!$ )4𝑒 -S$.*×$< C<
#, $!<'L<<
𝐶! (𝑡 = 1209600𝑠) = −(4.892 × 10!$ )4𝑒 -S$.*×$< T+ C<
𝐶! (𝑡 = 1209600𝑠) = (4.892 × 10!$ )[1 − 0.11335]
𝐶! (𝑡 = 1209600𝑠) = 4.337 × 10!$
49
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q17-1
∆𝑚 = 0.003 𝑢
2.
Then in the case of Li ground state, the energy of Li and α will be equal to 2.79 MeV while in
case of excited state which will result in gamma with energy of 0.482 MeV, Li and α will
have energy equals to 2.31 MeV.
3.
Ground state:
From conservation of momentum law:
𝑚„\ ∙ 𝑣„\ = 𝑚Y ∙ 𝑣Y
! !
𝑚„\ ∙ 𝑣„\ = 𝑚Y! ∙ 𝑣Y!
50
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q17-2
1 ! !
1
∙ 𝑚„\ ∙ 𝑣„\ = ∙ 𝑚Y! ∙ 𝑣Y!
2 2
1 !
1
∙ 𝑚„\ ∙ 𝑣„\ ∙ 𝑚„\ = ∙ 𝑚Y ∙ 𝑣Y! ∙ 𝑚Y
2 2
𝐸„\ ∙ 𝑚„\ = 𝐸Y ∙ 𝑚Y ……. (1)
(2.79 − 𝐸Y ) ∙ 𝑚„\ = 𝐸Y ∙ 𝑚Y
7.016
𝐸Y = 2.79 ∙
4.0026 + 7.016
7.016
𝐸Y = 2.79 ∙
4.0026 + 7.016
𝐸Y = 1.78 𝑀𝑒𝑉
Excited state:
7.016
𝐸Y = (2.79 − 0.482) ∙
4.0026 + 7.016
𝐸Y = 1.47 𝑀𝑒𝑉
51
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q17-3
𝐸„\ = 2.31 − 1.47 = 0.84 𝑀𝑒𝑉
4.
Peak (a) represents 2.31 𝑀𝑒𝑉 (the energy of Li and α in the excited state)
Peak (b) represents 2.79 𝑀𝑒𝑉 (the energy of Li and α in the ground state)
52
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q18-1
∆𝑚 = (𝑚r + 𝑚1 ) − (𝑚„\ + 𝑚Y )
∆𝑚 = 0.003 𝑢
2.
Then in the case of Li ground state, the energy of Li and α will be equal to 2.79 MeV while in
case of excited state which will result in gamma with energy of 0.482 MeV, Li and α will
have energy equals to 2.31 MeV.
3.
Ground state:
From conservation of momentum law:
𝑚„\ ∙ 𝑣„\ = 𝑚Y ∙ 𝑣Y
! !
𝑚„\ ∙ 𝑣„\ = 𝑚Y! ∙ 𝑣Y!
53
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q17-2
1 ! !
1
∙ 𝑚„\ ∙ 𝑣„\ = ∙ 𝑚Y! ∙ 𝑣Y!
2 2
1 !
1
∙ 𝑚„\ ∙ 𝑣„\ ∙ 𝑚„\ = ∙ 𝑚Y ∙ 𝑣Y! ∙ 𝑚Y
2 2
𝐸„\ ∙ 𝑚„\ = 𝐸Y ∙ 𝑚Y ……. (1)
(2.79 − 𝐸Y ) ∙ 𝑚„\ = 𝐸Y ∙ 𝑚Y
7.016
𝐸Y = 2.79 ∙
4.0026 + 7.016
7.016
𝐸Y = 2.79 ∙
4.0026 + 7.016
𝐸Y = 1.78 𝑀𝑒𝑉
Excited state:
7.016
𝐸Y = (2.79 − 0.482) ∙
4.0026 + 7.016
𝐸Y = 1.47 𝑀𝑒𝑉
54
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q17-3
THEORY
4.
Peak (a) represents 2.31 𝑀𝑒𝑉 (the energy of Li and α in the excited state)
Peak (b) represents 2.79 𝑀𝑒𝑉 (the energy of Li and α in the ground state)
55
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q18-1
1.2
1.0 mR / 0.0833 mR/min. = 12 minutes
2.
2.1
$($ $($ <
)(I → )"Xe + -$e
2.2
T1/2 = 6.01 hours
VW ! VW !
l=+ = *.P<
= 0.0797 days-1
!:
"
56
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q18-2
0.05 A0 = A0e-(0.0797)t
0.25 = 𝑒 -(<.$$)()+
t = 37.6 days
3.
ln 2 ln 2
l= = = 0.1153
𝑡$g 6.01
!
0.25 A0 = A0e-(0.1153)t
0.25 = 𝑒 -(<.$$)()+
t = 12.02 hours
4.
Alpha particles can be stopped by very thin shielding but have much stronger ionizing
potential than beta particles, X-rays, and γ-rays. When inhaled, there is no protective
skin covering the cells of the lungs, making it possible to damage the DNA in those
cells and cause cancer.
4. Alpha particles can be stopped by very thin shielding but have 0.5 pts
much stronger ionizing potential than beta particles, X-rays, and γ-
rays. When inhaled, there is no protective skin covering the cells of
57
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q18-3
the lungs, making it possible to damage the DNA in those cells and
cause cancer.
5.
5.1
The decay constant,
VW !
VW !
l = + = $P = 0.0408 day-1
!:
"
A = lN
$ †‡ˆ
= (0.0408 day-1)i*L"<< B#!j( 8.94 x 1014 nuclei)
= 4.22 x 108 Bq
5.2
58
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q18-4
5.2 Total mass = 1.53 x 10-10 kg 1.0 pts
6.
VW ! VW !
l=+ = $)
= 0.0462
!:
"
A = Aoe-lt
A = (0.05 x 10-6)e-(0.0462)(4.5)
= 4.06 x 10-8 Ci
= 40.6 x 10-9 Ci
= 40.6 x nCi
= 40.6 x 103 nCi
Given that 1 cm3 = of blood contains 8.00 pCi, and assume that Na-24 is uniformly
dispersed throughout the blood;
40.6 × 10(
𝑉+]+&p =
8
𝑉+]+&p = 5.08 liters
7.
VW ! VW !
l=+ = $".!L = 0.0486 day-1 = 5.63 x 10-7 s-1
!:
"
59
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q18-5
N = Noe-lt
= (9.28 x 1012)e-(0.0486)(10)
= 5.71 x 1012 nuclei
8.
Convert R/hour to mR/hour;
456 𝑅
× 1000 = 456 000 mR/h
ℎ
𝐼$ 𝐷$! = 𝐼! 𝐷!!
𝐼$ = 456000 mR
𝐷$ = 1 m
𝐼! = 2, 5 and 100 mR/h
(456000)(1)
𝐷! =
(2)
𝐷! = 477.5 m
(456000)(1)
𝐷! =
(5)
𝐷! = 301.99 m
(456000)(1)
𝐷! =
(100)
𝐷! = 67.5 m
60
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q19-1
1.1
For FDG:
ln (2)
𝜆=
𝑇$⁄!
ln (2)
𝜆=
110 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠 × (60 𝑠⁄𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠)
𝜆 = 1.05 × 10-" 𝑠 -$
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠
𝑁< = × 𝑁=
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠
10 × 10-( 𝑔
𝑁< = × 6.022 × 10!( 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒 -$
181.15 𝑔⁄𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒
𝑁< = 3.324 × 10$' 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝐴< = 𝜆𝑁<
𝐴< = 1.05 × 10-" 𝑠 -$ × 3.324 × 10$' 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝐴< = 3.491 × 10$) 𝐵𝑞
1.2
For FDG, where t = 2 hours:
𝑡 = 2 ℎ𝑟 × (3600 𝑠⁄ℎ𝑟) = 7200 𝑠
𝐴+ = 𝐴< × 𝑒 -R+
#0 ×P!<<
𝐴+ = 3.491 × 10$) 𝐵𝑞 × 𝑒 -$.<)×$<
𝐴+ = 1.639 × 10$) 𝐵𝑞
61
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q19-2
THEORY
1.3
For FDG, where t = 1 hour:
𝑁+ = 𝑁< × 𝑒 -R+
#0 ×$×(L<<
𝑁+ = 3.324 × 10$' × 𝑒 -$.<)×$<
𝑁+ = 2.278 × 10$' 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝑑𝑁
𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦, = −𝜆𝑁
𝑑𝑡
𝐷𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒 = 𝜆𝑁+
𝐷𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒
= (1.05 × 10-" 𝑠 -$ × 60 𝑠⁄𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒) × 2.278 × 10$' 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠
𝐷𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒 = 1.435 × 10$P 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠 -$
1.4
For FDG, where t = 4 hours:
𝜆 = 1.05 × 10-" 𝑠 -$
"
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦 𝑖𝑛 4 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑠, 𝑁‹ = ¢ 𝐴< 𝑒 -R+ 𝑑𝑡
<
"
-$.<)×$<#0 +
𝑁‹ = 3.491 × 10$) ¢ 𝑒 𝑑𝑡
<
-$.<)×$<#0 ×"×(L<< #0
$)
𝑒 𝑒 -$.<)×$< ×<
𝑁‹ = 3.491 × 10 × (− + )
1.05 × 10-" 1.05 × 10-"
𝑒 -$.)$! − 1
𝑁‹ = 3.491 × 10$) × (− )
1.05 × 10-"
𝑁‹ = 3.491 × 10$) × 7424.109
𝑁‹ = 2.592 × 10$' 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑎𝑦𝑠
62
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q19-3
1.4 𝐸‹ = 5.184 × 10$! 𝐽 3.0 pts
2.1
𝑇I%% = 35 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠
𝜆I%% = 𝜆 + 𝜆v
ln (2) ln (2) ln (2)
𝜆I%% = ,𝜆 = , 𝜆v =
𝑇I%% 𝑇$⁄! 𝑇v
2.2
An advantage of using short-lived radionuclides in imaging studies is the
reduction of radiation exposure to the patient. Because these radionuclides
have a shorter half-life, they undergo decay relatively quickly, resulting in a
shorter period of time during which the patient is exposed to radiation.
63
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution Q20-1
THEORY
1.1
The time required for the number of radioactive nuclei to decrease to one-half the original
number.
1.1 The time required for the number of radioactive nuclei to 0.5 pts
decrease to one-half the original number.
1.2
Subtracting the background counts, the decay counts are
1.2 𝑁$ = 372 – 5(15) = 297 in the first 5 min interval. 0.5 pts
𝑁! = 337 – 5(15) = 262 in the second. 0.5 pts
1.3
The amount of the radioactive sample at time 𝑡 is 𝑁 = 𝑁] 𝑒 -R+
Here we don’t know𝑁] !!
Therefore, we will follow another approach. The number of decay counts
between (𝑡 = 0) and (𝑡 = 𝑇) are:
𝑁$ = 𝑁] 𝑒 -R(<) − 𝑁] 𝑒 -R‹
𝑁$ = 𝑁] − 𝑁] 𝑒 -R‹
𝑁$ = 𝑁] L1 − 𝑒 -R‹ M = 297
𝑁$ + 𝑁! = 𝑁] 𝑒 -R(<) − 𝑁] 𝑒 -R(!‹)
𝑁$ + 𝑁! = 𝑁] − 𝑁] 𝑒 -R(!‹)
64
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q20-2
𝑁$ + 𝑁! = 𝑁] (1 − 𝑒 -!R‹ ) = 297 + 262 = 559
m! /m"
Now, considering the ratio 𝑟 = m!
to eliminate (𝑁] ) as follows:
𝑁$ + 𝑁! 𝑁] (1 − 𝑁] 𝑒 -!R‹ )
=𝑟=
𝑁$ 𝑁] (1 − 𝑒 -R‹ )
𝑟 − 1 = 𝑒 -R‹
𝑁$ + 𝑁!
(𝑟 − 1) = z − 1{
𝑁$ ln 2
ln(𝑟 − 1) = −𝜆𝑇 = − ¤ ¥𝑇
𝑁! 𝑇$
= z { !
𝑁$
ln 2
𝑇$ = − T
𝑁
! ln i ! j
𝑁$
1.3 ln 2 3.0 pt
𝑇$ = − T
𝑁
! ln i ! j
𝑁$
1.4
The value of the half-life is:
ln 2 ln 2
𝑇$ = − T = −(5 𝑚𝑖𝑛) × = 27.6 𝑚𝑖𝑛
𝑁 262
! ln i ! j ln i j
𝑁$ 297
1.5
The smallest likely value for the half-life is then given by:
262 − 5 ln 2
ln z { = − (5) Gives: z𝑇! { = 21.5 𝑚𝑖𝑛
297 + 5 𝑇$
! " 2\1
65
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q20-3
262 + 5 ln 2
ln z { = − (5) Gives: z𝑇! { = 38.7 𝑚𝑖𝑛
297 − 5 𝑇$
! " 2&u
𝑇$ = 30.1 ± 8.6
!
Part 2.
2.1
𝑁 = 𝑁] 𝑒 -R+ … (𝐴)
23 $
Where 𝜆 = 45
= 0.00990 𝑠 ,!
Substituting 𝑁5 = 82 in Eq(A):
80 𝑒 ,($!5)(5.55995) = 10.3 ≠ 19
∴ 𝑘 = 10 𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑠/𝑠
2.2
66
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q20-4
Here
𝑁 = 𝑁$ 𝑒 -R! + + 𝑁! 𝑒 -R" +
𝜆! ≪ 𝜆$
∴ 𝑇! ≫ 𝑇$
For times 𝑡 ≫ 𝑇$ , the main source of radioactivity would be due to the second source,
then:
𝑁 ≅ 𝑁! 𝑒 -R" +
And hence
ln 2
𝑇$ =
𝜆2
𝜆! ≪ 𝜆$
∴ 𝑇! ≫ 𝑇$
67
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q21-1
Q21. FUSION REACTION (10 pts)
1.
1 proton and 1 neutron.
2.
• Because deuteron nucleus contains 1 proton and 1 neutron, while each
Hydrogen nucleus contains only one proton.
• Because each heavy water molecule consists of two deuteron atoms
which is relatively similar to to the the size of the the neutron, and hence
the collisions would reduce the neutron’s speed.
3.
The deuteron and a triton are at rest before the fusion reaction, therefore,
the total momentum before the reaction is zero.
Hence, the conservation of momentum requires:
0 = 𝑚 7 v7 + 𝑚 6 v6
68
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q21-2
vn 𝑚7 4.0026 𝑢
= = = 3.968
v7 𝑚6 1.0087 𝑢
3. ln 2 3.0 pt
𝑇$ = − T
𝑁
! ln i ! j
𝑁$
4.
The deuteron and a triton are at rest before the fusion reaction, therefore,
the total momentum before the reaction is zero.
Hence, the conservation of momentum requires:
0 = 𝑚 7 v7 + 𝑚 6 v6
vn 𝑚7 4.0026 𝑢
= = = 3.968
v7 𝑚6 1.0087 𝑢
4. vn 1.5 pts
= 3.968
v7
5.
(a) The total energy of the neutron and the alpha particle can be calculated
from the defect mass:
𝐸 = 𝛥𝑚 × 931.494 𝑀𝑒𝑉
𝐸 = 17.51 𝑀𝑒𝑉
1 1
17.51 𝑀𝑒𝑉 = 𝑚! v!" + 𝑚# v#"
2 2
69
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q21-3
1 1 v! "
𝐸 = (1.0087 𝑢)v!" + (4.0026 𝑢) F G
2 2 3.968
17.51 𝑀𝑒𝑉 1𝑢
v!" = ×
0.631 𝑢 𝑀𝑒𝑉
931.494 "
𝑐
1 1 1𝑢
𝐾𝐸! = 𝑚! 𝑣!" = (1.0087 𝑢 ) × (0.173 𝑐)" ×
2 2 𝑀𝑒𝑉
931.494 "
𝑐
6.
𝐸1 + 𝐸Y = 𝑚1 𝑐 ! + 𝑚Y 𝑐 ! + 𝑘 [1]
(𝑚1 𝑐 ! )! −(𝑚Y 𝑐 ! )!
𝐸Y = 𝐸1 −
(𝑚1 𝑐 ! + 𝑚Y 𝑐 ! + 𝑘)
xNow substituting (𝐸Y ) from the above equation back to Eq. [1]:
(𝑚1 𝑐 ! )! −(𝑚Y 𝑐 ! )!
𝐸1 + 𝐸1 − = 𝑚1 𝑐 ! + 𝑚Y 𝑐 ! + 𝑘
(𝑚1 𝑐 ! + 𝑚Y 𝑐 ! + 𝑘)
(𝑚1 𝑐 ! )! −(𝑚Y 𝑐 ! )!
2𝐸1 = + 𝑚1 𝑐 ! + 𝑚Y 𝑐 ! + 𝑘
(𝑚1 𝑐 ! + 𝑚Y 𝑐 ! + 𝑘)
71
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q22-1
1.1
Alpha emitting radioisotope is preferred than a beta or gamma emitting isotopes
because of the properties of alpha particles produced.
1.1 Alpha particles are more easily absorbed by smoke particles OR 0.5 pts
Alpha particles are the most ionizing form of radiation.
1.2
The production of Am-241 radioisotope from U-238 is detailed below:
$<=
1.2 9$U + !5n → $<9
9$U + 55γ 1.5 pts
(0.25 pt
$<9 $<9
9$U → 9<Np + ,!5β + 55ν each)
$<9 $<9
9<Np → 9>Pu + ,!5β + 55ν
$<9
9>Pu + !5n → $>5
9>Pu + 55γ
$>5
9>Pu + !5n → $>!
9>Pu + 55γ
$>! $>!
9>Pu → 9>Am + ,!5β + 55ν
2.1
The half-life of a radioisotope is related to its decay constant as:
𝑡!/$ = ln 2 /𝜆
72
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q22-2
2.1 𝑡&/",) = 14.9999 days or 15 days 1.0 pt
𝑡&/",* = 365.0064 days or 365 days (0.25 pt
𝑡&/",+ = 199.9848 days or 200 days each)
𝑡&/",, = 100.0068 days or 100 days
2.2
These radioisotopes are not suitable alternatives for Am-241 in a smoke detector
because:
2.2 The half-life of the sources will be too short and when used 0.5 pts
it will result in smoke detectors that cannot last for 10 years.
3.1
The activity of the Am-241 in a smoke detector is one microcurie.
With 100% alpha emission, this corresponds to 37,000 alpha particles emitted per
second.
3.2
The total energy transferred due to ionization by an alpha particle per 1 cm distance
travelled can be calculated from the specific ionization and the energy required to
produce one ion pair:
.@ AB/ -CAD
= 36 AB/ -CAD
× 34,000 "#
𝑒𝑉 𝑀𝑒𝑉
= 1.22 × 10E 𝑜𝑟 1.22
𝑐𝑚 𝑐𝑚
The estimated range of the alpha particle in air is therefore:
73
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q22-3
5.5 𝑀𝑒𝑉
=
𝑀𝑒𝑉
1.22 𝑐𝑚
= 4.5 𝑐𝑚
3.3
The total dose absorbed from alpha radiation in the entire shift is:
The equivalent dose received by the worker from exposure to alpha particles can
be calculated from the absorbed dose and radiation weighing factor:
𝐻 =𝐷×𝑊
𝐻 = 3,600 × 20
𝐻 = 72,000 𝑛𝑆𝑣 𝑖𝑛 𝑡ℎ𝑒 12 − ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑓𝑡
If the exposure limit is 20 mSv per year (20 x 106 nSv per year), then the worker
can work:
𝑛𝑆𝑣
20 × 10E 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
=
72,000 𝑛𝑆𝑣
= 277.78 𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑓𝑡𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟
74
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q22-4
Part 4. Production of Am-241 (4 pts)
4.1
The rate equation for the buildup of Am-241 can be expressed as:
d𝑁FG
= 𝜆HI 𝑁HI − 𝜆FG 𝑁FG
d𝑡
The half-life of Am-241 is 432.6 y and that of Pu-241 is 14.3 years. Based on these data
and if the amount of Am-241 is zero at 𝑡 = 0, the plot of 𝑁HI and 𝑁FG as a function of
time will look as follows:
JK!"
4.1 Rate equation:
JL
= 𝜆HI 𝑁HI − 𝜆FG 𝑁FG 0.5 pts
(0.25
Plot of amount as function of time: pts
each)
75
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q22-5
4.2
Secular equilibrium cannot be attained, because the daughter nuclide, Am-241 has a
longer half-life (432.6 y) than its parent nuclide, Pu-241 (14.3 y). This means that Am-
241 activity builds up to a maximum and then declines. Because of its shorter half-life,
the parent eventually decays away and only the daughter is left.
4.3
Assuming that the decay of Am-241 is negligible, the rate equation for Am-241 can be
simplified into:
d𝑁-.
= 𝜆/0 𝑁/0
d𝑡
which provides the following simplified expression for 𝑁-. as a function of time:
𝑁-. = 𝜆/0 𝑁/0 𝑡
We first calculate:
𝑚𝑁) (50 g)(6.022 × 10"1 /mol)
𝑁/0 = = = 1.249 × 10"1
𝑀 241.05685 g/mol
ln(2) 0.693
𝜆/0 = = = 0.04846 y 2&
𝑡&/" 14.3 y
4.3 𝑁FG = 1.659 × 10!9 (accept 1.658 × 10!9 or 1.66 × 10!9 ) 1.0 pt
4.4
Substituting the values provided into the following equation:
𝜆/0 𝑁/0
𝑁-. = `e23!"4 − e23#$4 a
𝜆-. − 𝜆/0
76
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q22-6
(0.04846 y 2& )(1.249 × 10"1 ) 2(6.6898: ;%&)(6.66"%8;)
𝑁-. = `e
0.001602 y 2& − 0.04846 y 2&
%&
− e2(6.66&:6" ; )(6.66"%8 ;) a
𝑁-. = 1.659 × 10&=
This answer differs from the result obtained in (4.3) by 0.0069%, (or almost no
difference) which means that it is reasonable to neglect the decay of Am-241 as
long as the elapsed time is very short compared to its half-life.
4.4 𝑁FG = 1.659 × 10!9 (accept 1.658 × 10!9 or 1.66 × 10!9 ) (0.5 pts) 1.0 pt
4.5
We first obtain the decay constant of Am-241 in units of per second:
77
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q23-1
1.1
The total number of nuclei remains constant during the process of decay from
parent P to daughter D:
Solving for t,
1 𝐷(𝑡)
𝑡 = 𝑙𝑛 n1 + o
𝜆 𝑃(𝑡)
1 𝐷(𝑡)
1.1 𝑡 = 𝑙𝑛 g1 + i
1.0 pt
𝜆 𝑃(𝑡)
1.2
1.2 All daughter atoms are from the decay of the parent (0.5 pts) 1.0 pt
2.1
Decay chain for Th-232:
78
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q23-2
2.1 1.5
pts
(0.375
pts
each)
2.2
These radioisotopes are not suitable alternatives for Am-241 in a smoke detector
because:
𝑿 𝑃𝑏
𝑡 =
𝑈 + 0.326 𝑇ℎ
C
Multiply equation (1) with ( D/)
79
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q23-3
𝑃𝑏"6: 𝑊"6: 𝑃𝑏"69 𝑊"69 𝑃𝑏 𝑁) 𝑃𝑏 𝑁)
+ − 𝑃𝑏"6: − 𝑃𝑏"69 = −
𝑊 𝑊 𝑊 𝑊AB
Simplify
𝑊 − 𝑊AB
𝑃𝑏"6: (𝑊 − 𝑊"6: ) − 𝑃𝑏"69 (𝑊"69 − 𝑊) = 𝑃𝑏 𝑁) v w (4)
𝑊AB
Decay Formula
𝑢 = 𝑢E 𝑒 23+4 which can be written as 𝑢E = 𝑢𝑒 3+4 (5)
𝑡ℎ = 𝑡ℎE 𝑒 23.04 which can be written as 𝑡ℎE = 𝑡ℎ 𝑒 3.04
𝑃𝑏"6: 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑃𝑏"69 can be approximated by the decay of uranium and thorium atoms.
𝑃𝑏"6: = 𝑢E − 𝑢 (6)
𝑃𝑏"69 = 𝑡ℎE − 𝑡ℎ
H
𝑢 = D 𝑁) (8)
+
IG
𝑡ℎ = D 𝑁)
10
where:
U = mass of uranium (grams)
Th = mass of thorium (grams)
𝑊H = atomic weight of uranium isotopes (g/moles)
𝑊IG = atomic weight of thorium isotopes (g/moles)
𝑈
𝑃𝑏"6: = 𝑁 `𝑒 3+4 − 1a (9)
𝑊H )
𝑇ℎ
𝑃𝑏$5= = 𝑁 k𝑒 O#$ L − 1l (10)
𝑊MN 1
80
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q23-4
Substitute (9) & (10) to (4)
𝑈 𝑇ℎ 𝑊 − 𝑊AB
𝑁 `𝑒 3+4 − 1a(𝑊 − 𝑊"6: ) − 𝑁 `𝑒 3.04 − 1a(𝑊"69 − 𝑊) = 𝑃𝑏 𝑁) v w (11)
𝑊H ) 𝑊IG ) 𝑊AB
207.2−𝑊AB
5.041𝑥1021 `𝑒 3+4 − 1a𝑈 − 3.448𝑥1021 `𝑒 3.04 − 1a𝑇ℎ = 𝑃𝑏 v w (12)
𝑊AB
For the amount of common lead in the mineral (𝐿), from the equations (2), (9) & (10)
𝑃𝑏 𝑈 𝑇ℎ
𝑝 F𝑊 G 𝑁) − 𝑊 𝑁) `𝑒 3+4 − 1a − 𝑊 𝑁) `𝑒 3.04 − 1a
AB H IG
𝐿= 𝑊= 𝑊
𝑁) 𝑁)
𝑃𝑏 𝑈 𝑇ℎ
𝐿 = 207.2[ − `𝑒 3+4 − 1a − `𝑒 3.04 − 1a] (13)
𝑊AB 238.029 232.0381
Solution for equation (12) give us 𝑡, the age of mineral and (13) gives us the amount of
common lead present in the mineral.
𝜆" 𝑡 " 𝜆1 𝑡 1 𝜆8 𝑡 8 𝜆J 𝑡 J
𝑒 34 − 1 = 𝜆𝑡 + + + + + ⋯ … … … ..
2 6 24 120
Since 𝜆F 𝑡 𝑜𝑟 𝜆4G 𝑡 < 1 (if 𝑡 < 6x10= yrs.), 𝑒 34 − 1 ≈𝜆𝑡& , then equation (12) becomes
207.2−𝑊AB
5.041𝑥1021 (𝜆F 𝑡& )𝑈 − 3.448𝑥1021 (𝜆4G 𝑡& )𝑇ℎ = 𝑃𝑏 v w
𝑊AB
207.2 − 𝑊AB 1
𝑃𝑏 F 𝑊AB G
(5.041𝑥1021 )𝜆F
𝑡& = (14)
3.448𝑥1021 𝜆4G
𝑈− ( )𝑇ℎ
5.041𝑥1021 𝜆F
Now let us consider equation (13) when common lead is not present
81
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q23-5
𝑃𝑏 𝑈 𝑇ℎ
0 = 207.2[ − `𝑒 3+4 − 1a − `𝑒 3.04 − 1a ]
𝑊AB 238.029 232.0381
Solve for 𝑡
𝑃𝑏 238.029
(𝑊 )( 𝜆 )
AB F
𝑡=
238.029 𝜆
𝑈 + 232.0381 v 𝜆4G w 𝑇ℎ
F
Substitute all know values
Therefore
𝑃𝑏 (7,411,539,420)
𝑡=
𝑈 + (0.326)𝑇ℎ
3.1
The cosmic ray-induced reaction is
! !>
3.1 5𝑛 + !>
4𝑁 → E𝐶 + !!𝑝 1.0 pt
3.2
The preserved T rex skin contains the 5 mg of C, which is equivalent to the following number of C
atoms:
82
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q23-6
The number of C-14 atoms can be calculated from the atomic ratio measured by AMS:
𝑁(𝐶 − 14 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠)
𝑁(𝐶 − 14 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠) = 𝑁(𝐶 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠) ×
[𝑁(𝐶 − 12 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠) + 𝑁(𝐶 − 14 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠)]
K(P,!> CLB#Q)
Given the very low ratio of C-14 to C-12 atoms, the term [K(P,!$ CLB#Q)SK(P,!> CLB#Q)] could
K(P,!> CLB#Q)
be approximated as K(P,!$ CLB#Q). The equation can therefore be simplified as:
𝑁(𝐶 − 14 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠)
𝑁(𝐶 − 14 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠) = 𝑁(𝐶 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠) ×
𝑁(𝐶 − 12 𝑎𝑡𝑜𝑚𝑠)
𝐴 = 1.6348 × 10,E 𝐵𝑞
Now, the assumed constant specific activity of C-14 in the pre-nuclear era is 227 Bq/kg.
𝐴5 = 1.135 × 10,< 𝐵𝑞
The age of the T rex skin could be calculated based on the radioactive decay law, and
the solution is as follows:
1 𝑁5
𝑡 = 𝑙𝑛 | }
λ 𝑁
1 𝐴5
𝑡 = 𝑙𝑛 | }
λ 𝐴
83
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q23-7
1 1.135 × 10,< 𝐵𝑞
𝑡= 𝑙𝑛 ~ •
ln 2 1.6348 × 10,E 𝐵𝑞
|5,730 𝑦}
𝑡 = 54,087.5 𝑦
84
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q24-1
1.1
EB irradiation has higher dose rates compared to gamma irradiation.
1.1 EB irradiation has higher dose rates thus allowing greater 1.0 pt
throughput for butanediol production.
1.2
The kinetic energy of the electron can be determined from the energy of incident
gamma ray: 𝐾𝐸.U."LDB/ = 𝐸VC##C − 𝐵𝐸.
𝐾𝐸.U."LDB/ = 9,470 𝑒𝑉
4 𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑑 = 9,470 𝑒𝑉 ×
100 𝑒𝑉
1.3
To calculate the amount of power, which is equivalent to the amount of energy
delivered to the ethanol per unit time during irradiation, we simply multiply the
current with the energy of the accelerated electron used in the facility, assuming
85
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q24-2
that all the energy is absorbed by the ethanol being irradiated. The energy absorbed
per unit time in the irradiation of ethanol is:
𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑏𝑒𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 (𝑘𝑊) = 𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑡(𝑚𝐴) × 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑛 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 (𝑀𝑒𝑉)
1𝑚𝐴
𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑏𝑒𝑑 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑒 (𝑘𝑊) = 50 𝜇𝐴 × × 2 𝑀𝑒𝑉
1000 𝜇𝐴
10 𝑔 $<
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠 = 𝑔 × 6.022 × 10 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠/𝑚𝑜𝑙
90.121 𝑚𝑜𝑙
100 𝑒𝑉 1𝐽
𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 = 6.682127 × 10$$ 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠 × ×
2 𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑜𝑙 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑠 6.242 × 10!= 𝑒𝑉
𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 = 535,255.32 𝐽
The time needed to impart this amount of energy to produce the desired
amount of butanediol can be calculated from the calculated power of electrons
in the EB facility:
86
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q24-3
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 = 535,255.32 𝐽 × …1† 𝐽‡
100 𝑠
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 = 5,352.5532 𝑠
𝑇𝑖𝑚𝑒 = 89.2 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑠
2.1
We calculate first the energy delivered to air in one minute by the accelerator giving
10 W (10 J/s) of power.
𝐽
𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑏𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑎𝑖𝑟 = 10 × 60 𝑠
𝑠
From the calculated amount of energy absorbed by air, we can calculate the number
of ozone molecules produced.
And finally, the moles of ozone can be determined using Avogadro’s number:
Assuming ideal gas behavior, the volume of ozone in cubic centimeters (cc)
produced during the interaction of the accelerated electrons with air in the EB
facility can be calculated using the ideal gas equation.
𝑃𝑉 = 𝑛𝑅𝑇
𝑛𝑅𝑇
𝑉=
𝑃
87
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q24-4
𝐿 𝑎𝑡𝑚
(6.2192 × 10,> 𝑚𝑜𝑙)(0.0821 )(273.15 𝐾)
𝑉= 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐾
1 𝑎𝑡𝑚
𝑉 = 0.013947 𝐿 = 13.95 𝑐𝑐
2.2
The total absorbed dose in the 8-hour shift is the absorbed dose per hour multiplied
by the total hours of exposure:
𝜇𝐺𝑦
𝑎𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑏𝑒𝑑 𝑑𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑓𝑡 = 45 × 8ℎ
ℎ
The equivalent dose received by the worker can be calculated from the total dose
absorbed by the worker and the radiation weighing factor.
If the workers are limited to 8-hour shift per day, then the number of days a worker can
report to the plant can be calculated from the annual exposure limit set by the
regulatory body and the equivalent dose received per day.
𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑡
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠 =
𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑜𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑎𝑦
1000 𝜇𝑆𝑣
20 𝑚𝑆𝑣 × 1 𝑚𝑆𝑣
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑎𝑦𝑠 =
𝜇𝑆𝑣
360
𝑑𝑎𝑦
88
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q25-1
The first step is to determine the values for 𝑡< and 𝑡$ . The variable 𝑡< is the time
period the reactor was operating before shutdown:
The variable 𝑡$ is the time period since the reactor has shutdown:
Next, the variable 𝑃< is found, which is the thermal power of the reactor before
shutdown. Since the reactor was operating at 97% of its rated power, the rated
power must be multiplied by 0.97:
The above values are then substituted into the Wigner-Way equation:
1.2
Common light water reactor nuclear power plants contain three1 primary physical
barriers to the release of radioactive material to the environment:
0 Fuel cladding
1
The fuel matrix itself it sometimes considered a fourth physical barrier.
89
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q25-2
1 Primary system boundary (reactor vessel and piping)
2 Containment building
Since the accident scenario and loss of core cooling resulting in increased fuel
temperatures and fuel melting with cladding failure, only physical barriers #2
and #3 remained to prevent the release of radioactive material to the
environment.
1.2 1) Primary system boundary (or reactor vessel, primary coolant 0.5 pts
system, primary system, etc.)
2) Containment (or containment building, reactor building, etc.)
1.3
The following gamma ray shielding equation can be used:
𝑋̇ = 𝑋<̇ 𝑒 -•+
Where,
𝑋̇ = Exposure rate with shield in place
𝑋<̇ = Exposure rate without shield
𝜇 = Linear attenuation coefficient
𝑡 = Thickness of shield
To reduce the exposure rate by 1,000, the following ratio is used:
𝑋̇ 1
=
̇
𝑋< 1000
Stated another way, where 𝜇 = 29.205 cm-1
𝑋̇ 1
= = 𝑒 (-!'.(<)+)
𝑋<̇ 1000
Solving for t:
1
𝑙𝑛 z { = −29.305𝑡
1000
90
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q25-3
1.4
Dose can be calculated based on the source activity, the total time of exposure, and
dose conversion factor, which is given as a simplified “gamma constant” in this
problem. There, 1 mSv equals:
1 mSv = gamma constant × time × activity
Before the mass of Xe-133 can be found, the problem must be solved for activity:
mSv 1
1 mSv = 2.78E-5 z {z { × 24hr × activity (MBq)
hr MBq
activity = 1498.8 MBq
With activity found, the specific activity value of Xe-133 can be used to convert
activity to mass. However, given the units of specific activity, the activity of Xe-133
must first be converted from MBq to Ci:
1 Ci
1498.8E+6 Bq × z { = 0.0405 Ci
3.7E10 Bq
Finally, the specific activity value can be used to find the amount of mass:
Ci
1.4 . 𝟎𝟒𝟎𝟓 Ci / 𝟏. 𝟖𝟗E𝟓 | } = 𝟐. 𝟏𝟒𝟑E-7 g
0.5 pts
g
1.5
1.5 Evacuation can reduce (or eliminate) the amount of time that 0.5 pts
the population is exposed to radioactive material. It also
increases the distance between the population and the location
with radioactive material. In general, evacuation is not
associated with shielding, although the distance placed
between the population and the material can also be
considered shielding with air/structures.
91
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q25-4
1.6
The inverse square law can be used for this problem:
𝐷$ 𝑑$! = 𝐷! 𝑑!!
Where,
𝐷$ = Dose rate at distance 1
𝐷! = Dose rate at distance 2
𝑑$ = Distance 1
𝑑! = Distance 2
The following values are given:
𝐷$ = 8.7 𝑚𝐺𝑦/ℎ𝑟
𝑑$ = 35 𝑐𝑚 = 0.35 𝑚
𝑑! = 3 𝑚
Then solve for 𝐷!
𝐷$ 𝑑$!
𝐷! =
𝑑!!
(8.7 𝑚𝐺𝑦/ℎ𝑟) × (0.35 𝑚)!
𝐷! =
(3 𝑚)!
1.7
𝐷 = 𝐷] 𝑒 -•+
Where,
D = Dose rate with shield in place
D< = Dose rate without shield
𝜇 = Linear attenuation coefficient
𝑡 = Thickness of shield
The Half value thickness (HVL) is defined by:
92
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q25-5
𝑙𝑛 2
𝐻𝑉𝐿 (𝐻𝑎𝑙𝑓 − 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠) =
𝜇
Therefore, 𝜇 can be found based on the following:
𝑙𝑛 2
𝜇=
𝐻𝑉𝐿
𝑙𝑛 2
𝜇=
12.5 𝑐𝑚
𝜇 = 0.056 𝑐𝑚-$
Next, solve for shielding thickness t:
𝐷 = 𝐷] 𝑒 -•+
10 𝜇𝑆𝑣⁄ℎ𝑟 = 12.5𝑒 -<.<)L+ 𝑚𝑆𝑣⁄ℎ𝑟
10
𝑒 -<.<)L+ =
12.5 × 10(
𝑒 -<.<)L+ = 8 × 10-"
𝑙𝑛 𝑒 -<.<)L+ = 𝑙𝑛 8 × 10-"
−0.056𝑡 = −7.131
𝒕 = 𝟏𝟐𝟖. 𝟒𝟖𝟓 𝒄𝒎
1.8
The number of atoms of Cs-137 and Cs-134 can be found using the source activity:
𝑁 = 𝐴⁄𝜆
Where,
N = Number of atoms
93
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q25-6
𝐴 = Activity
𝜆 = Decay constant
First, convert the activity from µCi to Bq:
For Cs-137:
𝑁 = 𝐴⁄𝜆
5.775 × 10L 𝐵𝑞 ⁄𝑐𝑚(
𝑁=
7.286 × 10-$< 𝑠 -$
𝑵 = 𝟕. 𝟗𝟐𝟔 × 𝟏𝟎𝟏𝟓 𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒎𝒔⁄𝒄𝒎𝟑
Repeat for Cs-134:
𝐴 = 26 𝜇𝐶𝑖 ⁄𝑐𝑚( × (3.7 × 10$< 𝐵𝑞 ⁄𝐶𝑖 )
𝐴 = 9.62 × 10) 𝐵𝑞⁄𝑐𝑚(
𝑁 = 𝐴⁄𝜆
9.62 × 10) 𝐵𝑞⁄𝑐𝑚(
𝑁=
1.067 × 10-* 𝑠 -$
94
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
Q25-7
𝑵 = 𝟓. 𝟗𝟖𝟔 × 𝟏𝟎𝟏𝟑 𝒂𝒕𝒐𝒎𝒔⁄𝒄𝒎𝟑
1.9
The dose to each worker is the sum of the doses from individual sources:
𝐷‹ = Ô 𝐷̇\ × 𝑡
Where,
D• = Total dose
𝐷̇\ = Dose rate from source i
𝑡 = time
For worker A:
95
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY Q25-8
1.10
The activity of a source at a future time can be calculated based on the half-life:
𝐴(𝑡) = 𝐴< × 0.5(+/‹!/" )
Where,
A(t) = Activity at future time t
𝐴< = Current activity
𝑡 = time
𝑇! = Half life
"
For 137-Cs:
96
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury
Solution
THEORY
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
____________________________________________________________________________
97
Prepared by the 1st INSO International Jury