Fluorescence/photoacoustic Imaging Guided Nanomaterials For Highly Efficient Cancer Theragnostic Agent
Fluorescence/photoacoustic Imaging Guided Nanomaterials For Highly Efficient Cancer Theragnostic Agent
Fluorescence/photoacoustic Imaging Guided Nanomaterials For Highly Efficient Cancer Theragnostic Agent
com/scientificreports
OPEN Fluorescence/photoacoustic
imaging‑guided nanomaterials
for highly efficient cancer
theragnostic agent
Vu Hoang Minh Doan1,2,4, Van Tu Nguyen1,2,4, Sudip Mondal2, Thi Mai Thien Vo1,2,
Cao Duong Ly1, Dinh Dat Vu1, Gebremedhin Yonatan Ataklti1, Sumin Park1,2, Jaeyeop Choi1 &
Junghwan Oh1,2,3*
Imaging modalities combined with a multimodal nanocomposite contrast agent hold great
potential for significant contributions in the biomedical field. Among modern imaging techniques,
photoacoustic (PA) and fluorescence (FL) imaging gained much attention due to their non-invasive
feature and the mutually supportive characteristic in terms of spatial resolution, penetration depth,
imaging sensitivity, and speed. In this present study, we synthesized IR783 conjugated chitosan–
polypyrrole nanocomposites (IR-CS–PPy NCs) as a theragnostic agent used for FL/PA dual-modal
imaging. A customized FL and photoacoustic imaging system was constructed to perform required
imaging experiments and create high-contrast images. The proposed nanocomposites were confirmed
to have great biosafety, essentially a near-infrared (NIR) absorbance property with enhanced
photostability. The in vitro photothermal results indicate the high-efficiency MDA-MB-231 breast
cancer cell ablation ability of IR-CS–PPy NCs under 808 nm NIR laser irradiation. The in vivo PTT
study revealed the complete destruction of the tumor tissues with IR-CS–PPy NCs without further
recurrence. The in vitro and in vivo results suggest that the demonstrated nanocomposites, together
with the proposed imaging systems could be an effective theragnostic agent for imaging-guided
cancer treatment.
Recently, breast cancer is the main cause of mortality among women w orldwide1. The dramatic rise in breast
cancer death rates over the last two decades necessitates a greater emphasis on finding an adaptive therapy2.
The primary target in the battle against breast cancer is to establish successful therapeutic strategies with low
toxicity and high precision for eradicating tumors, especially their metastases, and preventing r ecurrence3. How-
ever, conventional methods for treating cancer such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy have several side effects4,5
and may need surgical intervention required for cancer t reatment6,7. Photothermal therapy (PTT), which pro-
duces heat from photothermal agents upon near-infrared (NIR) irradiation, is a promising technique of cancer
management8. PTT has many benefits over conventional cancer treatments, including high tumor sensitivity;
temporal, spatial selectivity; and less invasive to normal surrounding tissues9. The use of PTT agents to ablate
tumors by achieving adequate hyperthermia using NIR laser irradiation has been investigated as a highly accurate
and minimally invasive cancer treatment procedure10–12.
Photothermal therapy agents have a high NIR absorption property which facilitates deeper penetration
into the solid tumor without dispersing absorbed photons to the surrounding normal t issues13,14. Several NIR-
absorbing materials have been investigated for photothermal applications, including gold nanorods15,16, upcon-
version nanoparticles17, carbon nanotubes18, graphene19, graphene–iron oxide nanoparticles20, and polypyrrole
nanoparticles (PPy NPs)21,22. PPy NPs are one of the most effective polymeric photothermal agents among those
materials. They have high NIR absorbance, effective photothermal conversion efficiency, biocompatibility, and
low cytotoxicity. Additionally, PPy NCs show excellent photostability when exposed to NIR for a long time
period23. PPy NPs are easy to fabricate with large quantities at affordable p
rice24. Furthermore, PPy NPs were used
1
Industry 4.0 Convergence Bionics Engineering, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Pukyong National
University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea. 2New‑Senior Healthcare Innovation Center (BK21 Plus), Pukyong
National University, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea. 3Ohlabs Corp., Busan 48513, Republic of Korea. 4These
authors contributed equally: Vu Hoang Minh Doan and Van Tu Nguyen. *email: [email protected]
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
for cancer diagnosis as effective contrast agents because of their high NIR absorption p roperties25,26. A variety
of research groups have used them in imaging-guided PTT for in vivo cancer t reatment27,28. Similarly, marine
biopolymers such as chitosan (CS) have attracted considerable attention in recent years for their application in
the cosmetics, nutraceutical, and pharmaceutical industries29,30. Manivasagan et al. reported the combination
of CS and PPy to be a strong NIR absorbance PTT agent for cancer treatment. The chitosan–polypyrrole nano-
composites (CS–PPy NCs) have promising efficiency which could act as a multifunction theragnostic agent for
biomedical applications.
Fluorescence imaging along with NIR probes is evolving as a powerful diagnosis method for clinical applica-
tions such as intraoperative tumor margin detection31,32. In clinical trials, several research groups have demon-
strated effective NIR fluorescence imaging to classify neoplastic tissues based on various NIR p robes33–35. How-
ever, owing to strong optical scattering in biological tissue, fluorescence imaging resolution decreases drastically
as sample depth i ncreases36, restricting the efficient imaging-depth capacity. Photoacoustic imaging is a special
non-invasive imaging technology that relies on the acoustic waves produced from the absorption of pulsed laser
energy by endogenous tissue chromophores or supportive contrast agents37,38. In addition to possessing high
spatial resolution, high sensitivity properties as a general optical imaging technique, photoacoustic imaging has
the foremost benefit of penetration depth (up to several centimeters) since the emitted ultrasound waves are less
scattered in biological tissue than optical waves39,40. By contrast, fluorescence imaging is beneficial for construct-
ing large field-of-view images. Therefore, in terms of imaging resolution, depth, sensitivity, and speed, these two
imaging modalities are c omplementary41. As a consequence, design and synthesis of photoacoustic/fluorescence
dual-modality nanoprobes are highly desirable for many molecular imaging applications.
In this present study, the PA and FL imaging systems were fabricated to diagnose the cancer cells and tumor
region treated with synthesized IR-CS–PPy NCs. The IR-CS–PPy NCs were synthesized by the following previ-
ous protocol with further modification. The PTT-assisted IR-CS–PPy NCs were verified in vitro and in vivo to
confirm the photothermal effect under NIR laser irradiation. The FL/PA experiments were also performed to
prove the multimodal imaging ability of the developed IR-CS–PPy NCs.
Figure 1 indicates the possible mechanism of IR-CS–PPy NCs for treating the tumor with the guidance of
fluorescence and photoacoustic imaging system. The IR-CS–PPy NCs characteristics required for PTT and
imaging stages were described below.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 2. Characterization of CS–PPy NCs (a) UV–Vis–NIR absorbance spectrum CS–PPy NCs dispersion in
water. (b) XRD patterns of CS–PPy NCs. (c) Raman spectrum of CS–PPy NCs. (d) FTIR spectrum of CS–PPy
NCs. (e) FE-TEM image of CS–PPy NCs.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 3. Characterization of IR-CS–PPy NCs (a) UV–Vis spectrum of IR-CS–PPy NCs (125 μg/mL) before
and after PTT. (b) FE-TEM images of IR-CS–PPy NCs (125 μg/mL) before and after PTT.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 4. (a) The temperature elevation in an aqueous solution of different IR-CS–PPy NCs concentrations (0,
25, 50, 75, 100, 125 μg/mL) as a function of irradiation time by 808 nm laser at 2 W/cm2 of laser power densities.
(b) The temperature elevation of IR-CS–PPy NCs aqueous solution at a concentration of 125 μg/mL under 808-
nm laser irradiation at different power densities (0.5 W/cm2, 1.0 W/cm2, 1.5 W/cm2, and 2.0 W/cm2) for 5 min.
(c) The photothermal response of IR-CS–PPy NCs (125 μg/mL) aqueous solution exposed to an 808-nm laser
source at 2 W/cm2 for 300 s and then the laser was shut off for about 900 s. (d) Temperature profiles of IR-CS–
PPy NCs (125 μg/mL) aqueous solution for five on/off cycles. (e) The corresponding NIR thermographic images
of the well containing IR-CS–PPy NCs (125 μg/mL) during 300 s of laser irradiation (2 W/cm2).
Photothermal performance of IR‑CS–PPy NCs. After 5 min of the NIR irradiation (2.0 W/cm2), the
temperature increased to 28.7 °C for the control group without any IR-CS–PPy NCs materials, whereas the
temperature reached 62.6 °C for the IR-CS–PPy NCs (100 µL) inoculated solution for at the highest concen-
tration of 125 µg/mL (Fig. 4a). As shown in Fig. 4b, the temperature of IR-CS–PPy NCs solution (125 μg/mL)
increased to 25.7, 35.2, 51.5, and 62.6 °C when the laser power densities were applied at 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 W/
cm2, respectively. The graph in Fig. 4c and thermal images in Fig. 4e demonstrate the gradual increase of the
temperature during the turn-on cycle, whereas a steady decrease after the laser was turned off. The highest pos-
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 5. The cell viability of (a) MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and (b) L929 human normal fibroblast cells
treated with IR-CS–PPy NCs with and without NIR laser (2 W/cm2, 5 min). (b) The cell viability of L929
cells treated with IR-CS–PPy NCs with and without NIR laser (2 W/cm2, 5 min). (c) AO/PI staining of
MDA-MB-231 cells and L929 cells treated with PBS, PBS + laser (2 W/cm2, 5 min), 125 µg/mL IR-CS–PPy NCs,
and 125 µg/mL IR-CS–PPy NCs + laser (2 W/cm2, 5 min). Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation
(n = 3). (*Significant p < 0.05).
sible temperature (62.6 °C) above hyperthermia indicates the promising potential for killing tumor cells during
in vivo cancer therapy.
The laser on–off cycle was repeated 5 times to determine the photostability of IR-CS–PPy NCs. As illustrated
in Fig. 4d, there is no significant difference in the thermal profile among five cycles of the IR-CS–PPy NCs heat-
ing and cooling period. The photothermal conversion efficiency (η) of PTT nanomaterials is also an essential
characteristic that has to be verified. Based on the in vitro photothermal data, the linear fitting of the cooling
period was performed to define τs with a value of 156.48 s (Fig. S9). From the equations in Supporting Infor-
mation, the photothermal conversion efficiency (η) was calculated as 20.29%, similar to that of conventional
photothermal agents such as gold nanorods (~ 21%) and higher than that of Cu2−xS nanocrystals (~ 16.3%). The
in vitro photothermal results suggest that IR-CS–PPy NCs have consistent photothermal stability and a decent
photothermal conversion ability.
In vitro cell cytotoxicity assay and photothermal therapy. The biocompatibility of nanomaterials
is an essential aspect regarding biomedical applications. The standard MTT assay was used to inspect the cyto-
toxicity of IR-CS–PPy NCs against MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and L929 human normal fibroblasts cell lines.
After 24 h of incubation, there is a slight reduction in the number of living cells following the increase of the
IR-CS–PPy NCs dosage (Fig. 5a, b). The cell viability results indicate the good biocompatibility of IR-CS–PPy
NCs because no substantial cytotoxicity was detected even at the highest concentration of 125 µg/mL.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
The photothermal effect of IR-CS–PPy NCs was inspected based on the viability of MDA-MB-231 breast
cancer and L929 human normal fibroblasts cells during the in vitro PTT treatment. The cells were incubated
with different concentrations of IR-CS–PPy NCs (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 μg/mL) and then exposed to 808 nm
NIR (2 W/cm2) for 5 min. According to the viability studies, IR-CS–PPy NCs coupled with NIR laser could
effectively destroy cells in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4b). After being checked using the MTT
assay, the photothermal efficiency of IR-CS–PPy NCs was further examined by the fluorescence method. The
four groups of MDA-MB-231 and L929 human normal fibroblasts cells were formed based on corresponding
treatments: group I (PBS); group II (PBS + NIR laser); group III (CS–PPy NCs, 125 μg/mL); group IV (IR-CS–PPy
NCs, 125 μg/mL + NIR laser). Fluorescence dye AO and PI were co-stained with treated cells in every group.
AO enters live/ dead cells and emits green fluorescence, whereas, PI only penetrates dead cells and generates red
fluorescence. As illustrated in the merged fluorescence images, a few red-fluorescence signals were detected in
groups I, II, and III, suggesting the minority of deceased cells. Meanwhile, a significant number of cells in group
IV fluoresced red for both types of cell lines, suggesting that most of the cells were ablated (Fig. 5c). The in vitro
thermal results conclude that the IR-CS–PPy NCs with the supportive NIR laser could productively enhance
the ablation of breast cancer cells. There are no fluorescence hindrances or interference observed for conjugated
IR783 dye due to its different excitation and emission wavelength.
Fluorescence imaging and performance test. Different companies around the world support several
commercial fluorescence imaging systems for biomedical applications. The FOBI of Neoscience was used by
Chuang Gao et.al. to deal with indocyanine green fluorescence dye50. Lokesh Basavarajappa et. al. handled the
Pearl Triology from LI-COR Biosciences to detect IR-780 dye51. IVIS Spectrum from PerkinElmer is the most
popular fluorescence imaging system to monitor the whole mice body during in vivo fluorescence s tudy52. The
typical fluorescence imaging instruments discussed were used and confirmed by numerous researchers world-
wide. But those highly expensive systems are not easily available to most researchers in this field. The price range
of these instruments varies from 18,000$ to 550.000$ and more depending upon functions and applications. The
goal of our study is to fabricate a fluorescence system at an affordable price without compromising imaging qual-
ity. The lateral resolution of the proposed fluorescence imaging system was measured using a USAF resolution
test chart (R3DL3P, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) (Fig. S1a, S1b). From the equations in Supporting Information,
the lateral resolution was calculated as 140.29 μm following the previously reported method53. The different
concentrations of IR-CS–PPy NCs (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, 125 μg/mL) were used to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio
(SNR) of the fluorescence system. The SNR got the peak of 40.29 at the highest concentration (125 μg/mL). The
higher concentration of IR-CS–PPy NCs (25, 50, 75, 100 μg/mL) enhanced the SNR of the fluorescence system
at 5.74, 12.6, 21.91, 36.61, respectively (Fig. S1c).
For in vitro fluorescence study, two columns of dual control/fluorescent dye groups were prepared after several
steps. In Fig. 6a, no fluorescence signal was detected in five control wells while the strong fluorescence intensity
at different concentrations of IR-CS–PPy NCs was identified. Among them, the strongest one was observed at
the 125 μg/mL concentration of IR-CS–PPy NCs (Fig. 6d). After verifying in vitro, the highest concentration
(125 μg/mL) of IR-CS–PPy NCs was locally injected into the mice tumor for checking the in vivo distribution
using the NIR fluorescence imaging system. The fluorescence images of tumor-bearing mice were captured at
different time points (1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 h) until no evidence of IR-CS–PPy NCs was observed
(Fig. 6b). Right after intratumoral injection, few fluorescence signals were detected due to the attenuation of
IR783 in w ater54. Next, the IR-CS–PPy NCs were slowly accumulated by the tumor cells while the injected water
solution dissipated from the treated area. Therefore, the fluorescence intensity gradually increases and reached
a peak after 6 h. After that, it slowly decreases until 24 h due to the metabolic activity of the cellular system
(Fig. 6e). The intensity peak indicated the moment of strongest activity of IR-CS–PPy NCs inside the tumor
area and proved that 6 h after injection is the ideal time for the in vivo photothermal therapy. Furthermore, the
distribution of IR-CS–PPy NCs was investigated through ex vivo fluorescence imaging. After 24 h of injection,
the mice used for study in vivo were euthanized to collect and analyze organs and tumors. As observed in the
customized NIR fluorescence system, the fluorescence signal was only observed in tumor, whereas no significant
signal was found in other organs (Fig. 6c).
Photoacoustic imaging and performance test. The PAI system was widely used to spot the distribu-
tion of nanoparticles inside the mice body due to their high-resolution detection characteristics. Several studies
were reported showing high-quality images of nanoparticles distribution during in vivo experiment55,56. Our
PAI system was presented for the sake of collecting the same level of image quality. The characterization of the
proposed PAI system was conducted using 6-μm width carbon fiber, black tape and chicken breast tissue. The
measured lateral and axial resolutions were 7 μm and 75 μm, respectively (Fig. S2a and S2b). The longest distance
from the tissue surface to visible black tape (Fig. S2c) indicating the penetration depth (~ 1.2 mm) of our PAI
system. Fig. S2c demonstrates the SNR of the PAI system which increased from 8.33 to 12.5 when the IR-CS–PPy
NCs concentration increased from 75 to 125 μg/mL. (See Supplementary Information for more details about
resolution, penetration depth, SNR calculation of PAI system).
The performance of the fabricated PAI system was further tested with in vitro and in vivo experimental
studies. After 6 h of incubation with different concentrations of IR-CS–PPy NCs (75, 100, and 125 μg/mL), the
MDA-MB-231 cells were harvested. Thus, after trypsin digestion, the cells were pumped into PTFE tubes and
used for in vitro PAI study (Fig. S3). The three tubes containing IR-CS–PPy NCs-treated cells emitted signals;
meanwhile, no PA signal was produced from the control tube (Fig. 7a). The IR-CS–PPy NCs (highest concentra-
tion at 125 μg/mL) produced a higher PA signal at 532–1000 nm and 625–1000 nm compared to the lower ones
(Fig. S4). The in vitro results indicate the IR-CS–PPy NCs’ ability as a PAI-guided nanomaterial.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 6. (a) In vitro fluorescence imaging of control cells and MDA-MB-231 cell treated with different concentrations of IR-CS–PPy
NCs (25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 μg/mL) (b) In vivo fluorescence imaging of MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing nude mice at different time
points after local injection of IR-CS–PPy NCs. (c) Ex vivo fluorescence imaging of the organs including, the heart, liver, lung, kidney,
and spleen, and tumors excised from the mice treated with IR-CS–PPy NCs at 24 h post local injection. (d) The mean fluorescence
intensities of different concentrations of IR-CS–PPy NCs were measured, displaying the highest fluorescence intensity at 125 μg/mL.
(e) The mean fluorescence intensities of tumors were quantified at different time points, showing a peak value after 6 h injection of
IR-CS–PPy NCs. Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Min = 0, and Max = 100.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 7. (a) In vitro PAI of MDA-MB-231 cells incubated with various concentrations of IR-CS–PPy NCs
using PAI system with 532–1000 nm wavelength and 625–1000 nm wavelength. (b) Representative digital
photographs of MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing nude mice for in vivo PAI. The white dash lines indicate the
tumor area. (c) In vivo PAI of tumor tissues in MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing nude mice at 0, 6, and 12 h after
injection of IR-CS–PPy NCs (100 μL) using PAI system with 532–1000 nm wavelength, and 625–1000 nm
wavelength. (d) Representative 3D PA images of tumor tissues MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing nude mice at 0, 6,
and 12 h after injection of IR-CS–PPy NCs using PAI system with 532–1000 nm wavelength.
For the very first of in vivo PAI, the tumor area of MDA-MB-231-bearing mice was scanned using the PAI
system with laser (wavelength: 532–1000 nm) to visualize the local microvascular system. Followed by a long-pass
filter was used to block the wavelength under 625 nm for the sake of removing the PA image of blood vessels.
As illustrated in Fig. 7c, in the pre-injection part, the blood vessels gather at a higher density at the tumor area
in the 532–1000 nm wavelength, whereas all blood vessel images were blocked by the filter in the 625–1000 mm
wavelength. Next, 0.1 mL IR-CS–PPy NCs (125 μg/mL) was prepared and locally injected into the tumor area
of MDA-MB-231-bearing mice (Fig. 7b). After 6 h and 12 h of injection, the same process as pre-injection was
repeated. The tumor area of injected mice generated a higher PA signal due to the appearance of IR-CS–PPy
NCs in the 532–1000 nm wavelength at 6 h. The presence and extension of IR-CS–PPy NCs were clearly revealed
with support from the filter in the 625–1000 nm image. Because of the circulation of blood during mice’s activi-
ties, the PA intensity of the IR-CS–PPy NCs was fairly reduced after 12 h of injection (Fig. S5). The in vivo PAI
results prove the optimal time for the photothermal therapy was 6 h post-injection of IR-CS–PPy NCs. The
reconstructed 3D images in Fig. 7d and Video S1, S2, and S3 clarify the distribution of injecting nanomaterials
inside the mice samples.
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
The proposed PAI system constructed a high-contrast tumor structure and nanomaterial distribution with a
high spatial resolution. The additional IR-CS–PPy NCs enhanced the PA intensity and served as an effective PA
contrast agent for following photothermal therapy. Similar results have been presented by Manivasagan et al.15
Thi Tuong Vy, Phan et al.27.
In vivo photothermal therapy. To further investigate the thermal efficiency of IR-CS–PPy NCs, in vivo
PTT study was performed on tumor-bearing mice. The thermal image of treated mice was captured using the i5
IR thermal camera to monitor the temperature variation in tumor areas. As illustrated in Fig. 8a and b, the tumor
temperature of group IV under the effect of the IR-CS–PPy NCs and NIR laser, reached 59.8 °C within 300 s,
whereas the only PBS without any nanoparticle raised up to 36.8 °C temperature when irradiated with 808-nm
laser for 300 s. The temperature peak resulted in by IR-CS–PPy NCs-assisted laser was able to induce the tumor
ablation in vivo. No sudden death during laser treatment was witnessed, and no considerable weight change was
recorded on daily observation basis (Fig. 8e). The overall experimental study proves that IR-CS–PPy NCs are
highly biocompatible and did not produce any considerable toxicity in vivo due to their photothermal impact.
As illustrated in Fig. 8d, there were negligible differences in tumor volumes and tumor growth rates in groups I,
II, and III, suggesting that NIR laser irradiation (808 nm) and IR-CS–PPy NCs individually did not significantly
affect tumor growth. Meanwhile, the IR-CS–PPy NCs-mediated PTT could effectively retard tumor growth and
completely destroy tumors after 20 days (Fig. 8c). After successful treatment, only scars were found at the tumor
site; thus, the treated mice in all groups were euthanized by cervical dislocation to collect all organs and tumors
(Fig. S6). As illustrated in Fig. S7, the tumors for all groups were collected, weighed, and compared. There was
no tumor found for group IV mice; which indicates the efficiency of IR-CS–PPy NCs that generates sufficient
heat to ablate the tumor without regrowth. Histological analysis (Fig. S8) also revealed no noticeable toxic effect
of IR-CS–PPy NCs on the major organs of mice after 20 days of photothermal treatment. Comparing with the
control group, no significant tissue morphological differences were observed for IR-CS–PPy NCs treated group
of animals. In case of the control group, the histological analysis for tumor sample, densely packed tumor cells
were identified with deep staining. Whereas, IR-CS–PPy NCs treated group of mice was successfully cured and
no tumor was observed.
Conclusion
In this present study, the improved IR-CS–PPy NCs were synthesized as multimodal imaging-guided PTT
contrast agents. Because of the great NIR absorption, the proposed IR-CS–PPy NCs exhibited high-efficiency
therapeutic capacity and thermal stability, which were demonstrated during in vitro thermal therapy. The synthe-
sized NPs were also highly biocompatible, as there was no significant decrease in the number of live cells when
treated with different concentrations. After injecting the nanocomposites at the tumor areas, the targeted regions
were diagnosed very accurately by the FL/PA imaging systems. The fluorescence and photoacoustic modules
were proposed and fabricated to acquire the experimental images during the imaging period of in vitro, in vivo,
and ex vivo studies. After 20 days of the treatment with IR-CS–PPy NCs with NIR laser irradiation, the treated
tumors disappeared and the MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing mice fully recovered without noticeable side effects.
Generally, our findings demonstrate that the multimodal imaging system based on the proposed nanomaterials
is capable of effectively treating the tumors in vivo. The non-toxic and stable characteristics along with thermal
and dual-modal imaging properties of the synthesized IR-CS–PPy NCs could be a promising theragnostic agent
for biomedical applications.
Characterization of synthesized CS–PPy NCs and IR‑CS–PPy NCs. The absorption spectrum of
CS–PPy NCs and IR-CS–PPy NCs was discovered using UV–Vis spectroscopy (Thermo Biomate 5 Spectropho-
tometer). The structure of the synthesized CS–PPy NCs was studied through X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns
in the step-scan mode using a Philips X’Pert-MPD PW 3050 diffractometer with Cu Kα (40 kV, 30 mA). Fourier
transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Perkin Elmer Inc., USA) and Raman spectroscopy (Horiba Jobin Yvon
RAM HR800) with frequencies ranging from 4000 to 400 cm−1, were used to investigate the functional and
structural groups. The CS–PPy NCs and IR-CS–PPy NCs’ size and composition were characterized using field
emission transmission electron microscopy (FE-TEM; JEM-2100F, JEOL, Japan). The working condition for
FE-TEM was maintained as follows: TEM lattice resolution at 200 kV was 0.1 nm, with probe current: 2.5 nA at
0.7 nm of probe diameter (pressure 1 × 10−8 Pa).
In vitro cell culture study. In this study, the breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and human normal
fibroblasts (L929) cell line were used to assess the ability for biomedical application of the proposed IR-CS–PPy
NCs. The standard DMEM media used to culture the cells procured from the Korean Cell Line Bank (KCLB,
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 8. (a) NIR thermographic images of tumor-bearing mice with intratumoral injection of PBS and IR-CS–PPy NCs with 808-
nm NIR laser irradiation at 2.0 W/cm2 for 5 min. (b) Temperature change of tumor-bearing mice after intratumoral injection of with
IR-CS–PPy NCs with 808-nm NIR laser irradiation at 2.0 W/cm2 for 5 min. (c) The digital photographs of tumor-bearing mice taken
at day 0 before treatment and 20 days after treatment. (d) Tumor volume growth curves of different groups of mice after different
treatments. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation. (n = 3). (e) The body weight after different treatments indicated in 20 days.
Data are shown as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
The animal model. All the animal experiments were performed in accordance with the animal ethical
committee guidelines and regulations approved by Pukyong National University, Busan, Republic of Korea All
the animal experimental studies were approved by ethics committee of Pukyong National University, Busan,
Republic of Korea. The protocol PKNU IACUC-2019-09 for the animal experiment study was strictly followed
and performed following ARRIVE guidelines and regulations for the care and use of laboratory animals. Six-
week-old BALB/c female nude mice (~ 20 g) purchased from Orient Bio Inc. (Seongnam, Republic of Korea)
were used for in vivo experiments regarding the institutional guidelines. For the animal cancer model, 100 μL
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) suspension of 1 × 106 MDA-MB-231 cells was subcutaneously injected into the
right flank of all the mice. The dimensions of tumors were measured every day using a digital caliper until their
volume reached approximately 100 mm3.
Fluorescence imaging system design (LUX 3.0). All of the fluorescence images in this study were
obtained from the indigenously developed NIR fluorescence imaging system (LUX 3.0). A self-made controller
printed circuit board (PCB) was designed to manipulate the whole system. There are several blocks in this PCB
with the 8-bit microcontroller (PIC16F1713-I/SS, Microchip Technology Inc., Austin, TX, USA) being used
for the primary processor cores. The microcontroller set the output current of the light-emitting diode (LED)
driver (RCD-24-1.2, RECOM Power, Dietzenbach, Germany) through the digital-analog converter mode. Every
LED whose working current is smaller than 1.2 amp can be connected with this driver. An indigenous motor-
ized filter wheel was fabricated consisting of a step motor (42HS4013A4G18, NEMA, Arlington, VA, USA),
a motor driver (DRV8825, Texas Instruments, Dallas, TX, USA), and a proximity sensor (LJ8A3-2-Z/BX-5V,
Suzhou Leoho Electronics, Suzhou, China). The chamber was lightened up by the white LED module (LMMW1,
OMC Ltd., Redruth, UK) to obtain the background image. The user interface was built based on a 5-inch liquid
crystal display touchscreen (NX8048T050, Nextion, Shenzhen, GD, China) with the supportive Nextion Editor
programming software.
For dealing with the IR783 fluorescence dye, we used a compact excitation module including a 780-nm NIR
LED (M780L3; Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) and a required excitation filter (FF01-769/41-25; Semrock, Roch-
ester, NY, USA). The output light from the LED was justified by a special coating collimated lens (ACL2520B;
Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) to effectively irradiate the sample. Another corresponding filter (FF01-832/37-25;
Semrock, Rochester, NY, USA) was used to minimize the background noise of emission signals generated from
the fluorescence contrast agent. To acquire all filtered fluorescent images, an imaging module was built including
a USB 3.0 NIR camera (GS3-U3-41C6NIR-C; FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, OR, USA) integrated with a machine
vision lens (V1628-MPY 1.1 f/2.8; CBC Group, Phoenix, AZ, USA). The image acquisition was performed using
the FlyCapture (FlyCapture Software Development Kit (SDK) 2.0; FLIR Systems, Wilsonville, OR, USA) and the
acquired images were processed by ImageJ (ImageJ 1.53e; National Institute of the Health, MD, USA). Figure 9a is
a schematic diagram of the fluorescent system. The 3D model of the controller PCB and the fluorescence system
are presented in Fig. 9b and c, respectively.
Photoacoustic imaging system design. In the current study, we designed and developed a customized
high-resolution PAI system whose schematic diagram is represented in Fig. 10. A high-efficiency diode-pumped
Q-switched 532-nm laser (SPOT-10-100-532; Elforlight, Daventry, UK) was used at a 5 kHz frequency to excite
the system. The generated light was coupled into a 2 m single-mode patch cable (P3-460B-FC-2; Thorlabs, New-
ton, NJ, USA) by a half-wave plane and a fiber coupler. The coupled laser output was filtered and collimated by
several objective lenses and a band-pass filter to achieve near-diffraction-limited laser focus. The laser energy
density adjusted to be under 13.3 mJ/cm2 was utilized to irradiate the sample. A tailored-made PAI probe was
fabricated to guide the laser light and maximized the generated ultrasound waves in the reflecting mode as fol-
lowed from a previous study59. The acoustic signals were received by an attached 25 MHz transducer with a 0.5-
inch focal length (V324-SM; Olympus, Norfolk, VA, USA). A z-axis stage was used to synchronize the laser spot
and transducer focal point to gain the optimum ultrasound signals, and a 2D motorized stage (x- and y-axis) was
used to scan the sample. The focused transducer was then connected with two serial preamplifiers (ZFL-500LN;
Mini-Circuits, Brooklyn, NY, USA) to boost the received signal before transmitting it to the acquisition system
(NI PXI-5124; National Instruments, Austin, TX, USA). The electrical trigger created at the 10 µm spatial step of
the linear actuator was synchronized with the laser to construct the 2D PA image. The system had to operate for
approximately 10 min to scan an 8 × 8 mm field-of-view image. Finally, an open-source software platform (3D
Slicer version 4.10.2; slicer.org) was used to build the 3D model.
Fluorescence imaging. The MDA-MB-231 cells were incubated with IR-CS–PPy NCs for different con-
centrations (5, 25, 50, 100, and 125 μg/mL) and were ready for the in vitro study. The fluorescence intensities of
IR-CS–PPy NCs were observed within 6 h. For the in vivo fluorescence, the IR-CS–PPy NCs (125 μg/mL) was
locally injected into the MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing mice. The in vivo fluorescence distribution at different
time intervals (1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 h) was monitored using the customized fluorescence imaging
system described earlier. After the imaging period, the mice were euthanized by carbon dioxide inhalation fol-
lowed by cervical dislocation to collect all organs including the liver, lung, kidney, spleen, heart, and tumors. The
ex vivo fluorescence was performed after washing all of the obtained organs with cold PBS.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 9. The proposed fluorescence imaging system (a) Schematic diagram of fluorescence system and the
controller printed circuit board (PCB) (b) 3D design of controller PCB (c) 3D design of fluorescence system.
Photoacoustic imaging. The previously described PAI system was used to conduct the photoacoustic
imaging experiment. Various concentrations of IR-CS–PPy NCs NCs (75, 100, and 125 μg/mL) were used to
treat the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells for 6 h. The treated cells were centrifuged for 3 min at 950 rpm
after trypsin digestion. The polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes were prepared to contain the cell pellets as
the in vitro PAI sample. The IR-CS–PPy NCs with 125 μg/mL concentration was selected to use for in vivo
PAI. The prepared solutions were applied to the right flank of tumor-bearing nude mice through intratumoral
injection. The in vivo PA images of IR-CS–PPy NCs distribution were constructed at pre-injection, 6 and 12 h
post-injection.
Measurement of the photothermal performance of IR‑CS–PPy NCs. The IR-CS–PPy NCs were
dispersed in distilled water at various concentrations (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 µg/mL), followed by inoculation
of 1 mL prepared solution to each 12-well plate for assessing photothermal performance. Each well was directly
exposed to 808-nm NIR laser at 2 W/cm2 of power density for 5 min. The well with the highest concentration
(125 µg/mL) was further irradiated with different power densities (0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 W/cm2) for 5 min. The real-time
temperature of the exposed area was monitored using an infrared (IR) thermal camera (FLIR i5, FLIR Systems,
Wilsonville, OR, USA) and a digital thermometer.
The photothermal stability of IR-CS–PPy NCs was studied using a quartz cuvette. The 1 mL aqueous solu-
tion of the IR-CS–PPy NCs (125 μg/mL) was applied to the quartz cuvette irradiated by 808-nm NIR laser for
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Figure 10. Schematic of the proposed photoacoustic imaging system. HWP half-wave plate, FC fiber coupler.
300 s at a density of 2 W/cm2. The temperature fluctuations were measured during five cycles of laser activation
accompanied by five cycles of heating, cooling process. According to previously reported s tudies60,61, the photo-
thermal conversion efficiency (η) was obtained (see Supporting Information).
In vitro cytotoxicity assay and photothermal efficiency. The percentage of viable MDA-MB-231
breast cancer cells and L929 human normal fibroblasts cell lines was calculated to evaluate the cytotoxicity of
IR-CS–PPy NCs. The 96-well plates were used for seeding the cells at a concentration of 1 × 104 cells/well. After
24 h of incubation with different concentrations of IR-CS–PPy NCs (0, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 µg/mL), 100 µL
MTT was poured in each treated well to assess the cell viability. To evaluate the in vitro photothermal efficiency
of IR-CS–PPy NCs, another group of IR-CS–PPy NCs-treated cells was irradiated with 2 W/cm2 NIR laser for
5 min. Next, the cells were incubated for a further 2 h, and finally, the MTT assay was performed to quantify the
cell viability post-NIR laser treatment.
For qualitative photothermal capacity evaluation, 12-well plates were used to incubate MDA-MB-231 and
L929 cells (2 × 105 cells per well) for 24 h at 37 °C of temperature. After removing the culture media, we separate
the cells into four groups: group I (PBS treatment), group II (PBS plus NIR laser treatment), group III (125 μg/
mL IR-CS–PPy NCs treatment), and group IV (125 μg/mL IR-CS–PPy NCs plus NIR laser treatment). After
5 min of laser exposure, the cells in all groups were stained with acridine orange (AO) and propidium iodide
(PI). The in vitro photothermal effect was assessed based on fluorescence images of the samples obtained using
a Leica DMI300B fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
In vivo photothermal therapy. The in vivo photothermal therapy efficiency of the synthesized IR-CS–PPy
NCs was examined using MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing mice. The mice tumors were grown until their volume
reached around 100 m m3. After that, the mice were divided into four groups (n = 3): group 1 treated with only
PBS, group 2 treated with PBS + NIR laser, group 3 treated with only IR-CS–PPy NCs, and group 4 treated with
IR-CS–PPy NCs + NIR. The mice were given 100 µL of PBS or IR-CS–PPy NCs with a concentration of 125 g/
mL through intratumoral injection. After 6 h of injection, groups II and IV received thermal therapy through the
exposure of the tumor areas to the NIR laser at a density of 2.0 W/cm2 for 300 s. The thermal camera was used
to continuously monitor the tumor temperature change during treatments. Until 20 days after injection, all mice’
weight was checked using lab weighing scales, and tumor volume was measured after every two days interval
using a digital caliper. The tumor volume (mm3) was calculated using the equation V = (1/2) × (L × W2), where, L
is the tumor’s length, and W is its width.
Histological analysis. After 20 days of experimental study, five major organs: liver, spleen, kidney, lung,
heart and tumor were harvested from the control and treated group of mice. Each organ was dehydrated by
neutral buffered formalin and fixed with a series of chemical immersion for histological analysis. The chemically
fixed samples were microtomed into 4 μm thick sections for further staining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)
and observed under the optical microscope.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Statistical analysis. All the data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were
carried out using one-way analysis of variance. OriginPro 8.0 from OriginLab corp. (Northampton, MA, USA)
was used to analyze the data.
References
1. Agabeigi, R., Rasta, S. H., Rahmati-Yamchi, M., Salehi, R. & Alizadeh, E. Novel chemo-photothermal therapy in breast cancer using
methotrexate-loaded folic acid conjugated Au@SiO2 Nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res. Lett. https://d oi.o
rg/1 0.1 186/s 11671-0 20-3 295-1
(2020).
2. Azamjah, N., Soltan-Zadeh, Y. & Zayeri, F. Global trend of breast cancer mortality rate: A 25-year study. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev.
https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.7.2015 (2019).
3. Feng, Y. et al. Breast cancer development and progression: Risk factors, cancer stem cells, signaling pathways, genomics, and
molecular pathogenesis. Genes Dis. 5(2), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2018.05.001 (2018).
4. Jeffe, D. B., Pérez, M., Cole, E. F., Liu, Y. & Schootman, M. The effects of surgery type and chemotherapy on early-stage breast
cancer patients’ quality of life over 2-year follow-up. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 23(3), 735–743. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4926-0
(2016).
5. Ratajczak, M. Z., Jadczyk, T., Schneider, G., Kakar, S. S. & Kucia, M. Induction of a tumor-metastasis-receptive microenvironment
as an unwanted and underestimated side effect of treatment by chemotherapy or radiotherapy. J. Ovarian Res. https://doi.org/10.
1186/1757-2215-6-95 (2013).
6. Sheng, W. Y. & Huang, L. Cancer immunotherapy and nanomedicine. Pharm. Res. 28(2), 200–214. https://d oi.o
rg/1 0.1 007/s 11095-
010-0258-8 (2011).
7. Hamdy, S., Haddadi, A., Hung, R. W. & Lavasanifar, A. Targeting dendritic cells with nano-particulate PLGA cancer vaccine
formulations. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63(10–11), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2011.05.021 (2011).
8. Zou, L. et al. Current approaches of photothermal therapy in treating cancer metastasis with nanotherapeutics. Theranostics 6(6),
762–772. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.14988 (2016).
9. Fang, J. & Chen, Y.-C. Nanomaterials for photohyperthermia: A review. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19(37), 6622–6634. https://doi.org/10.
2174/1381612811319370006 (2013).
10. Tian, Q. et al. Sub-10 nm Fe3O4@Cu2−xS core–shell nanoparticles for dual-modal imaging and photothermal therapy. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 135(23), 8571–8577. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja4013497 (2013).
11. Jaque, D. et al. Nanoparticles for photothermal therapies. Nanoscale 6(16), 9494–9530. https://d oi.o
rg/1 0.1 039/c 4nr00 708e (2014).
12. Geng, J. et al. Biocompatible conjugated polymer nanoparticles for efficient photothermal tumor therapy. Small 11(13), 1603–1610.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201402092 (2015).
13. Cheng, W. et al. A multifunctional nanoplatform against multidrug resistant cancer: Merging the best of targeted chemo/gene/
photothermal therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(45), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201704135 (2017).
14. Tao, W. et al. Black phosphorus nanosheets as a robust delivery platform for cancer theranostics. Adv. Mater. 29(1), 1–9. https://
doi.org/10.1002/adma.201603276 (2017).
15. Manivasagan, P. et al. Anti-EGFR antibody conjugation of fucoidan-coated gold nanorods as novel photothermal ablation agents
for cancer therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(17), 14633–14646. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b00294 (2017).
16. Kang, X. et al. Photothermal therapeutic application of gold nanorods-porphyrin-trastuzumab complexes in HER2-positive breast
cancer. Sci. Rep. 7(January), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep42069 (2017).
17. Li, P. et al. Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles complexed with nano-oxide graphene used for upconversion fluorescence
imaging and photothermal therapy. Biomater. Sci. 6(4), 877–884. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7bm01113j (2018).
18. Moon, H. K., Lee, S. H. & Choi, H. C. In vivo near-infrared mediated tumor destruction by photothermal effect of carbon nano-
tubes. ACS Nano 3(11), 3707–3713. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn900904h (2009).
19. Yang, K. et al. Graphene in mice: Ultrahigh in vivo tumor uptake and efficient photothermal therapy. Nano Lett. 10(9), 3318–3323.
https://doi.org/10.1021/nl100996u (2010).
20. Justin, R. et al. Photoluminescent and superparamagnetic reduced graphene oxide–iron oxide quantum dots for dual-modality
imaging, drug delivery and photothermal therapy. Carbon N. Y. 97, 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2015.06.070 (2016).
21. Phan, T. T. V., Bui, N. Q., Moorthy, M. S., Lee, K. D. & Oh, J. Synthesis and in vitro performance of polypyrrole-coated iron–plati-
num nanoparticles for photothermal therapy and photoacoustic imaging. Nanoscale Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-
017-2337-9 (2017).
22. Vy Phan, T. T. et al. Polypyrrole–methylene blue nanoparticles as a single multifunctional nanoplatform for near-infrared photo-
induced therapy and photoacoustic imaging. RSC Adv. 7(56), 35027–35037. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra02140b (2017).
23. Manivasagan, P. et al. Multifunctional biocompatible chitosan–polypyrrole nanocomposites as novel agents for photoacoustic
imaging-guided photothermal ablation of cancer. Sci. Rep. 7(March), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43593 (2017).
24. Hong, J. Y., Yoon, H. & Jang, J. Kinetic study of the formation of polypyrrole nanoparticles in water-soluble polymer/metal cation
systems: A light-scattering analysis. Small 6(5), 679–686. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200902231 (2010).
25. Zha, Z. et al. Biocompatible polypyrrole nanoparticles as a novel organic photoacoustic contrast agent for deep tissue imaging.
Nanoscale 5(10), 4462–4467. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00627a (2013).
26. Wang, X. et al. Enhanced photothermal therapy of biomimetic polypyrrole nanoparticles through improving blood flow perfusion.
Biomaterials 143, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.08.004 (2017).
27. Phan, T. T. V. et al. Photoacoustic imaging-guided photothermal therapy with tumor-targeting HA-FeOOH@PPy nanorods. Sci.
Rep. 8(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27204-8 (2018).
28. Wang, M. et al. Fluorescence imaging-guided cancer photothermal therapy using polydopamine and graphene quantum dot-capped
Prussian blue nanocubes. RSC Adv. 11(15), 8420–8429. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra10491d (2021).
29. Xia, W., Liu, P., Zhang, J. & Chen, J. Biological activities of chitosan and chitooligosaccharides. Food Hydrocoll. 25(2), 170–179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2010.03.003 (2011).
30. Phan, T. T. V., Phan, D. T., Cao, X. T., Huynh, T. C. & Oh, J. Roles of chitosan in green synthesis of metal nanoparticles for biomedi-
cal applications. Nanomaterials 11(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11020273 (2021).
31. Zhang, X., Bloch, S., Akers, W. & Achilefu, S. Near-infrared molecular probes for in vivo imaging. Curr. Protoc. Cytom. 2012(SUPPL.
60), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142956.cy1227s60 (2012).
32. Cao, J. et al. Recent progress in NIR-II contrast agent for biological imaging. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7(January), 1–21. https://
doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00487 (2020).
Vol:.(1234567890)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
33. Yue, X., Zhang, Q. & Dai, Z. Near-infrared light-activatable polymeric nanoformulations for combined therapy and imaging of
cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 115, 155–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2017.04.007 (2017).
34. Van Dam, G. M. et al. Intraoperative tumor-specific fluorescence imaging in ovarian cancer by folate receptor-α targeting: First
in-human results. Nature Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2472 (2011).
35. Hu, Z. et al. First-in-human liver-tumour surgery guided by multispectral fluorescence imaging in the visible and near-infrared-I/
II windows. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 4(3), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0494-0 (2020).
36. Xi, L. et al. Photoacoustic and fluorescence image-guided surgery using a multifunctional targeted nanoprobe. Ann. Surg. Oncol.
21(5), 1602–1609. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3541-9 (2014).
37. Liu, C. et al. Advances in imaging techniques and genetically encoded probes for photoacoustic imaging. Theranostics 6(13),
2414–2430. https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.15878 (2016).
38. Attia, A. B. E. et al. A review of clinical photoacoustic imaging: Current and future trends. Photoacoustics 16(November), 100144.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2019.100144 (2019).
39. Hu, S. & Wang, L. V. Photoacoustic imaging and characterization of the microvasculature. J. Biomed. Opt. 15(1), 011101. https://
doi.org/10.1117/1.3281673 (2010).
40. Rao, B., Zhang, R., Li, L., Shao, J. Y. & Wang, L. V. Photoacoustic imaging of voltage responses beyond the optical diffusion limit.
Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02458-w (2017).
41. Zhao, J. et al. Recent developments in multimodality fluorescence imaging probes. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 8(3), 320–338. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.apsb.2018.03.010 (2018).
42. Gowtham, B. et al. Physical investigations on various weight percentage of acetic acid doped polypyrrole by chemical oxidative
polymerization. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 30(6), 2197–2203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-019-01408-5 (2020).
43. Wang, Z. L. et al. Semiconducting and piezoelectric oxide nanostructures induced by polar surfaces. Adv. Funct. Mater. 14(10),
943–956. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200400180 (2004).
44. Margheri, G., Trigari, S., Berti, M., Muniz Miranda, M. & Traversi, R. Chitosan-capped Au nanoparticles for laser photothermal
ablation therapy: UV–Vis characterization and optothermal performances. J. Spectrosc. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8271254
(2018).
45. Oh, J. W., Chun, S. C. & Chandrasekaran, M. Preparation and in vitro characterization of chitosan nanoparticles and their broad-
spectrum antifungal action compared to antibacterial activities against phytopathogens of tomato. Agronomy https://doi.org/10.
3390/agronomy9010021 (2019).
46. Xie, Y. & Du, H. Electrochemical capacitance of a carbon quantum dots-polypyrrole/titania nanotube hybrid. RSC Adv. 5(109),
89689–89697. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra16538e (2015).
47. Lee, Y. K., Lee, K. J., Kim, D. S., Lee, D. J. & Kim, J. Y. Polypyrrole–carbon nanotube composite films synthesized through gas-phase
polymerization. Synth. Met. 160(7–8), 814–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.01.028 (2010).
48. Ye, D., Luo, L., Ding, Y., Chen, Q. & Liu, X. A novel nitrite sensor based on graphene/polypyrrole/chitosan nanocomposite modi-
fied glassy carbon electrode. Analyst 136(21), 4563–4569. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1an15486a (2011).
49. Hao, G. et al. Physicochemical characteristics of chitosan from swimming crab (Portunus trituberculatus) shells prepared by
subcritical water pretreatment. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81318-0 (2021).
50. Gao, C. et al. Harnessing platelets as functional vectors for contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging and fluorescence imaging. RSC
Adv. 9(72), 41993–41999. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ra05118j (2019).
51. Basavarajappa, L., Rijal, G. & Hoyt, K. Image-guided focused ultrasound therapy system and method for improved anticancer
drug delivery. IEEE Int. Ultrason. Symp. IUS https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8925705 (2019).
52. Leslie, J., Robinson, S. M., Oakley, F. & Luli, S. Non-invasive synchronous monitoring of neutrophil migration using whole body
near-infrared fluorescence-based imaging. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81097-8 (2021).
53. Kanniyappan, U. et al. Performance test methods for near-infrared fluorescence imaging. Med. Phys. 47(8), 3389–3401. https://
doi.org/10.1002/mp.14189 (2020).
54. Hale, G. M. & Querry, M. R. Optical constants of water in the 200-Nm to 200-Μm wavelength region. Appl. Opt. 12(3), 555. https://
doi.org/10.1364/ao.12.000555 (1973).
55. Liu, Z. et al. Nucleus-targeting ultrasmall ruthenium(IV) oxide nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging and low-temperature
photothermal therapy in the NIR-II window. Chem. Commun. 56(20), 3019–3022. https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cc09728g (2020).
56. Ding, D. et al. MoO3−x quantum dots for photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal/photodynamic cancer treatment. Nanoscale
https://doi.org/10.1039/c6nr09046j (2017).
57. Fang, Y. et al. Biocompatibility of CS–PPy nanocomposites and their application to glucose biosensor. Bioelectrochemistry 88, 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioelechem.2012.05.006 (2012).
58. Feng, Q. et al. Tumor-targeted and multi-stimuli responsive drug delivery system for near-infrared light induced chemo-photo-
therapy and photoacoustic tomography. Acta Biomater. 38, 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.04.024 (2016).
59. Doan, V. H. M., Nguyen, V. T., Choi, J., Park, S. & Oh, J. Fuzzy logic control-based HIFU system integrated with photoacoustic
imaging module for ex vivo artificial tumor treatment. Appl. Sci. 10(21), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10217888 (2020).
60. Roper, D. K., Ahn, W. & Hoepfner, M. Microscale heat transfer transduced by surface plasmon resonant gold nanoparticles. J.
Phys. Chem. C 111(9), 3636–3641. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp064341w (2007).
61. Liu, X. et al. Facile synthesis of biocompatible cysteine-coated CuS nanoparticles with high photothermal conversion efficiency
for cancer therapy. Dalton Trans. 43(30), 11709–11715. https://doi.org/10.1039/c4dt00424h (2014).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to give a special thanks to Dr. Manivasagan Panchanathan for his helpful advice during
the preparation of the manuscript.
Author contributions
V.H.M.D. wrote the main manuscript text, designed the fluorescence system, and conducted the fluorescence
experiment, photothermal therapy. V.T.N. set up and did the photoacoustic experiment. S.M. edited the manu-
script text, conducted the photothermal therapy. T.M.T.V. and S.P. synthesized the nanoparticles and did the
characterization. D.D.V. G.Y.A. designed the electrical circuit for the fluorescence system. C.D.L. processed and
reconstructed the 3D photoacoustic images. J.C. and J.O. managed workflow and gave instructions. All authors
have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was supported by Pukyong National University Development Project Research Fund (Philosopher
of Next Generation), 2020.
Vol.:(0123456789)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/
10.1038/s41598-021-95660-w.
Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.O.
Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Vol:.(1234567890)