Case Study 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

CASE STUDY 1

Yet another poor year... Profits down by 15%, sales and turnover static in a market... reckoned to
be growing at a rate of some 20% per annum - these are the words of Ajay Kapoor, Senior
Executive of Mephisto Products Ltd. Kapoor's concern is that the company may be out of
business if the next year turns out to be as bad as this.

Mephisto Products produces a range of sophisticated electromechanical control devices. Major


customers of Mephisto Products are chemical processing industries. The control devices are
fitted to the chemical processing plants in order to provide safety and cut-out mechanisms to
prevent anything hazardous during the manufacturing process. The products are sold through a
national sales force of some twelve people. Each operates in a different area of the country and
all are technically qualified mechanical or electrical engineers.

The company believed till now that if the product was right, i.e., well designed and manufactured
with a high level of quality, there would be a market. Therefore, very little advertising and sales
promotion was carried out. The assumption was that the product should sell on its own.

Pricing of the product was done on a cost-plus basis with total cost being calculated and a fixed
percentage added as profit. Prices were fixed by the accounts department and sales had no say in
how they were worked out. This led to much dissent among the salespeople and they constantly
argued that prices were not competitive, and if those were not reduced, sales would decline
substantially.

There were also very few discounts given to big buyers. Here again, the salespeople had to get
all such discounts first approved by the Accounts Department. In the matter of discounts, the
company's old philosophy prevailed: 'Why offer discounts for large quantities if they did not
want that many, they would not order them."

Delivery periods were slow in Mephisto compared with average in the industry. Here also, the
company's old philosophy ruled: “If they want the products badly enough, they will wait for it.”

Marketing has become much more competitive now with many new entrants particularly from
foreign countries coming into the Indian market. Many of those new entrants have introduced
new and upgraded products. These new products are seen by many buyers as technically
innovative. But Mephisto has been ignoring product life cycles expecting that customers would
come back to their products.

Kapoor is worried about the developments over the past five years and there is need for changes
in the company. He is aware that the more successful new entrants have introduced a marketing
philosophy into their operations. But Mephisto's Sales Manager, who is expecting to be shortly
made Sales Director, is of the view the marketing is suitable for a baked beans manufacturer, but
not for a company engaged in the manufacture and sale of sophisticated control devices for the
chemical industry. He argues that Mephisto's customers would not be swayed by 'superficial
advertising and market ploys'.
Case Question Is Mephisto Products' sales and marketing approach responsible for the
company's sinking situation? While explaining this, also comment on Mephisto's (a) marketing
orientation, (b) marketing mix application and (c) product life cycle.

Suggest solution for the case.

What title do you think the case shoud have?

You might also like