Essential-Guide Excerpts
Essential-Guide Excerpts
Essential-Guide Excerpts
of
Law School
The Essential Guide
for
First-Year Law Students
Law Is Personal
1L Mind- Set | 15
Rule 4
16 | 1L Mind- Set
Rule 5
You will find that this way of thinking is helpful for re-
solving questions on an exam and arguing about the best
new restaurant or hot- button political issue. It will also
make you insufferable around your nonlawyer friends and
family.
1L Mind- Set | 17
Rule 8
Planning to Plan | 23
Rule 14
32 | Books
Rule 19
40 | Studying
Rule 20
Studying | 41
Rule 21
Read!
Reading | 45
Rule 22
46 | Reading
Rule 23
Reading | 47
Rule 24
48 | Reading
Rule 25
Reading | 49
Rule 26
During the first week, you will brief every case and prom-
ise yourself you will continue to do so all semester. By the
second week, you will start taking shortcuts, using com-
mercial case briefs, or just underlining extra hard. This is
a common but counterproductive approach. Do the hard
work of briefing your own cases.
Briefing cases matters because the briefing process forces
you to deconstruct the structure of a case. By breaking
down the facts, pulling out the issues, rewriting the rules,
and mastering the holding, you are decoding how the law
is put together, while at the same time encoding it as your
own.
If you merely copy the words on the page, you are doing
it wrong. Briefing involves active learning. The repetitive
process of breaking down cases and building up your own
knowledge is central to being a good lawyer. You are build-
ing the muscle memory of legal reasoning, and it takes rep-
etition, thought, and practice. The goal is that after doing
this for a year, the ability to break down and organize a case
will be intuitive. You will never have to think twice in your
career if you can master this skill now. After a year, the skill
will be in your lawyerly DNA.
Briefing Cases | 53
Rule 27
In time, you will sense that IRAC (issue, rule, analysis, con-
clusion) is the secret key to success on law school exams.
On an issue-spotting exam, there are issues for you to
spot. Each issue has a rule. Each rule can be applied to
the facts. This application is the analysis. The analysis leads
to a conclusion. Writing an answer in IRAC format (or
some variant) will become a constant drumbeat as you hear
about ways to succeed on exams.
But if you study your briefed cases, you will also see the
IRAC pattern. Judges routinely start cases with sentences
like, “The issue in this case is . . .” and methodically list out
the elements of the rule. The rule is then analyzed against
the facts, providing the analysis and then the conclusion.
If you start seeing that many cases follow the IRAC pat-
tern and many legal arguments follow the IRAC pattern,
you will see why the framework is also so useful on exams.
Every 1L course teaches you a variety of issues. Again,
each issue has a rule. Your task on an exam (or in life) is to
identify the issue, cite the rule, apply the facts, and come
up with a conclusion. Judges do that every day in their
written opinions. Litigators do it in their briefs. Lawyers do
it every day in solving problems. It is the pattern that links
all your class work and the work you will do as a lawyer.
54 | Briefing Cases
Rule 29
56 | Briefing Cases
Rule 30
Briefing Cases | 57
Rule 31
In Class | 61
Rule 32
62 | In Class
Rule 33
In Class | 63
Rule 39
72 | Habits of Success
Rule 40
Habits of Success | 73
Rule 41
Confidence | 77
Rule 42
78 | Confidence
Rule 43
Confidence | 79
Rule 44
80 | Confidence
Rule 46
Outlines | 85
Rule 47
86 | Outlines
Rule 49
A Mind Map
88 | Outlines
Rule 50
Outlines | 89
Rule 51
Test Yourself
If you simply read and reread the cases assigned, you are
likely to do poorly in law school. Reading is not the same
thing as applying the law. You have to find ways to test
yourself. If you simply memorize the rules, you will think
you know the law, but you will only be half ready for an
exam. You need to test those rules on new facts.
Find supplements, tests, or quizzes and force yourself to
apply the rules you have learned from the cases. You will
see that reading provides only the basic knowledge, with
none of the nuance you need to master the course.
Only by testing (and getting the answers wrong until
you get them right) will you start to see the level of de-
tail needed to master the course. Application, application,
application is really repetition, repetition, repetition, and
the key to success. This cannot be emphasized enough. Ap-
plication means taking practice exams, studying practice
exams, and taking them again. Application means challeng-
ing yourself to fail in your first few attempts. Application
means testing yourself so hard that the final exam seems
routine. There is no substitute. There is no other way.
You think you can write. Sure, you have been writing your
whole life. Sure, legal writing seems just like normal writ-
ing and should be easy. You are wrong.
Legal writing is not more difficult than other types of
writing. It is not more complicated. But it is different, and
that difference must be understood and accepted.
Once you accept this truth, you will also accept the
constructive criticism coming from your legal writing pro-
fessors. Be kind. Legal writing professors have the hardest
jobs on the faculty because they must tell you to improve
your writing to your face (not hidden behind blind grading
rules). No one wants to hear they could do better, espe-
cially at something as personal as writing, but you should
listen to the hard truths your professors share.
Once you accept these truths, you will start to see the
structure, form, language, and conventions that distinguish
legal work. You will distinguish between legal writing as ad-
vocacy and legal writing as advice. You will see the style of
judicial opinions as opposed to legal scholarship. You will
see that lawyers write a lot and that plenty of examples exist.
Once you accept the truth that you cannot write, you can
start studying the craft of legal writing. No one is born a
great legal writer. It takes work, study, practice, and editing.
110 | Professors
Rule 66
Expectations of Excellence
You have one chance to learn the law. Why would you
shortchange yourself and your future clients? Every time
you skip a class or a case or do less than the best you can
do, you undermine your own expectations of excellence.
Help build a culture of excellence. Make it unacceptable
to be unprepared for class or late. Make it a practice to join
the debate and speak. Make it a habit to engage the mate-
rial at a level of precision, depth, and nuance so that you
feel like you own it. Set aside enough time to do the assign-
ments in a way that will make you feel proud. Last- minute
efforts or halfhearted attempts are not excellent and are not
the stuff of excellent lawyers. They are not who you want
to be as a lawyer.
Any lawyer in any law school can be the best lawyer
in their city if they work hard enough. You must estab-
lish your own internal standards of excellence and work to
achieve them. You are building a “brand” as a lawyer, and
it starts in law school. You may not be able to change your
peers in law school. You may not be able to change your
law school. But you can change your own expectations and
raise them high enough to excel.
Find Perspective
Not all midterm exams are issue- spotting exams. Some pro-
fessors use multiple choice, essay, or a problem approach.
But issue-spotting exams cause problems for 1Ls because
they are unlike other types of exams you might have had
in college.
Issue-
spotting exams involve a hypothetical fact pattern
in which students are expected to find the legal issues and
analyze the applicable law. When you first come across such
an exam, you might be paralyzed with trying to figure out
where to start. So here is a guide.
The overall goal is to spot the legal issue, demonstrate
you know the legal rule that governs the issue, analyze the
rule on the basis of the facts given, and conclude with an
answer. This is the IRAC method. Here is a handy way to
think about the task at hand:
I: In every fact pattern there will be legal issues.
R: Every legal issue spotted has a rule. Every rule can be
broken into elements.
A: Every element needs an argument from the facts.
C: Your argument needs a conclusion.
Just repeat this process over and over as you work through
the facts.
144 | Midterms
Rule 87
Exams equal stress. You can feel it in the air of a law school,
when for several weeks the final-
exam- generated tension is
palpable and unavoidable.
There is a reason for the stress. You are being asked to
synthesize too much information about too many subjects
in too little time. Even if you have followed all the rules in
this book, you will be stressed. No one can tell you to avoid
stress or use stress to focus in a way that will be helpful.
Stress is not helpful or avoidable.
But you can plan for it, put it in context, and not let
it take over your life. You will walk into each final exam
stressed. You will also walk out of that exam. And no mat-
ter how you do on the actual exam, you will be fine. Mil-
lions of lawyers have done it, and you will too.
Taking care of yourself as you approach exams is criti-
cally important. It seems cruel to suggest getting enough
sleep, eating right, and exercising at a time when everyone
knows those luxuries of life are nearly impossible with the
amount of work expected. But sleeping helps your think-
ing. Exercise clears the mind. Eating is necessary for your
body. If you plan ahead, you can find ways to destress and
take care of yourself. And if you didn’t plan ahead, don’t
worry; you will survive.
Read the questions before you read the facts. When you
first read the exam, skip to the actual questions at the end.
How many questions are there? How much time per ques-
tion? Read the call of the question carefully. Take a moment
to think. Strategize an answer. Don’t jump right into the
facts before you have thought through your strategy based
on the questions. Don’t skip over a question. (It happens.
It shouldn’t.) Five minutes of strategizing is worth twenty
minutes of panicked writing.
Words matter. Your professors have spent time crafting
the questions to test your knowledge. They have added
time suggestions to indicate what type of answer they ex-
pect. They have written the questions to keep you from
complaining that they were unfair after the fact. They have
written the questions carefully to get you to see certain is-
sues and make certain arguments. Exam drafting is a skill,
and the words chosen matter. Read carefully and think
about why the words were used. The call of the question
can be a helpful clue.