Persuasive Speech
Persuasive Speech
Persuasive Speech
• They try to enlist (to ask) our support, sell us products, or change our behaviors.
Understanding Persuasion
• All persuasion is self-persuasion.
Definition of Persuasion
• It is the way you try to have a particular impact on the other person’s thinking,
feeling, or action.
• Influence…
• You (as the speaker) can affect the other person’s thinking, feeling, or
action…even if you have little or no power.
• You try to get your audience to adopt (accept) your position (what you ask for).
Power vs Influence
• The persuader can force someone to say or do something.
Influence
Types of Influence
• To Change
• To Instill
• To Intensify
Values
Beliefs
Attitudes
Behaviors
#1. CHANGE
• This is the most dramatic response because you want the audience to alter their
value, belief, attitude or behavior.
#2. INSTILL
• To instill is to address (talk about) a particular problem about which the listeners
are unaware or undecided.
• You have successfully instilled a belief if you can persuade the audience that the
problem exists and is important.
#3. INTENSIFY
• You can intensify the audience’s value, belief, attitude or behavior if the audience
already shares your position (agrees with you).
• Know if your audience opposes, is indifferent (doesn’t care) to, or supports your
position.
• The information you gather and the assumptions (guess) you make about the
audience should determine your persuasion strategy.
• Persuasion occurs when the audience’s opinion moves in the direction you
advocate (support).
• To Convince
• To Actuate
• To Inspire
• Examples
• To persuade the audience that air travel is safer than ground travel
• Examples
• To move or actuate the audience to donate money or goods to orphanages
• Examples
• To have the audience appreciate those who made their education possible
• To inspire my students to enjoy studying Purposive Communication
Principles of Persuasion
Persuasion is more likely if the speaker follows certain fundamental (basic) principles.
• Step by step
• It is difficult for them to argue with you if they don’t have enough information.
• If the topic or issue is important to them, they will listen and think more; thus,
increasing the likelihood of persuasion.
• How can your speech give them what they need or want?
#6. The message is consistent with the audience’s values, beliefs, attitudes &
behaviors.
• Be careful that your message is not contrary to their values, beliefs, attitudes &
behaviors.
• Put your strongest argument at the beginning or at the end of your speech.
• According to Primacy Theory, messages that are said first have the greatest
impact.
• In contrast, Recency Theory states that messages which are mentioned last
have the most impact.
• They will not listen to someone whom they know does not have the experience,
knowledge or expertise on the subject matter.
• Finding common ground means to find something similar & important with
another person.
• A persuasive speaker must make efforts to change the attitude of the listener(s)
because attitude affects the way a person thinks.
• Principle of Consistency
• The human mind looks for consistency in attitudes and beliefs. If the brain
experiences inconsistency, change will occur to establish consistency
(homeostasis).
• The greater the inconsistency, the greater the change. However, the mind has its
limits to how much inconsistency it can tolerate.
• Selective perception: what you choose to think about & how you think about it
• Ethos derives (comes) from the character and reputation of the speaker.
Initial Credibility
Derived Credibility
Terminal Credibility
• The image listeners develop of a speaker by the end of a speech and for a period
of time after it
#1. Competence
#2. Trustworthiness
#3. Dynamism
Pathos can be very powerful and effective in persuasion. Using emotional appeal must
be done ethically.
• Though this is an advantage that native speakers have, the words must be
understood by the audience.
References
th
• Grice, G.L. & Skinner, J.L. (2001). Mastering public speaking (4 ed.). Boston.
McGraw-Hill
***
Fact
Value
Policy
Regarding Facts
• A question about the truth or falsity of an assertion
• Examples of facts
• Note!
• Just like an informative speech, a persuasive speech on questions of fact also
gives facts, but its purpose is to convince.
• Speakers also give facts in a persuasive speech, but they will give only the facts
that will support their position. They will not share all the information to the
audience.
Informative Speech
• Purpose is to inform
• The speaker is a lecturer
• Nonpartisan
• Not take sides
• Purpose is to persuade
• Partisan
• Take sides
You must state your standard that will be used to judge your claim.
• You cannot just state your opinion. You must justify (give a reason for) your
claim.
• When making a claim, you must first establish some standard (or criteria).
These are statements of value, but you must justify each one.
• Preparing your own food is a good practice.
• (You must explain why you think it’s a good practice.)
• Specific Purpose
• To persuade my audience that cheating to win is not a good habit.
• Central Idea
• Winning by cheating is wrong because you will not improve, people will not trust
you, and you will not feel good about yourself.
• Main Points
• To win because of cheating is wrong because you will not improve your skill or
knowledge.
• To win because of cheating is wrong because people will know and they will then
not trust you.
• To win because of cheating is wrong because, in the end, you will not feel good
about yourself.
• It can involve questions of fact or value, but it is really about what to do or what
not to do.
• Examples
• What measures should be taken to minimize road accidents during the holidays?
Types of Speeches
Regarding Policy
Speeches to Gain Passive Agreement
Speeches to Gain Immediate Action
• The goal is to get the listeners to agree with you on a certain policy.
• However, you do not ask them to take any action.
• As a speaker, you are trying to influence your audience’s opinion or feelings.
• Examples
• To persuade my audience that all karaoke bars should close not later than
midnight.
• To persuade my audience that motorists should obey the speed limit at all times.
• Examples
• To convince my audience to exercise regularly.
Problem-Solution Order
Problem-Cause-Solution Order
Direct Method Order
Criteria Satisfaction Order
Negative Method Order
Comparative Advantages Order
Monroe’s Motivated Sequence Order
Problem-Solution Pattern
• In the 1st main point, you discuss about a problem and how serious it is.
• In the 2nd main point, you introduce your plan and explain how it will solve the
problem.
• Example
• Main Point #1
• Studies have shown that students taking narcotics suffer from serious physical
and mental problems. (Problem)
• Main Point #2
• Schools must educate students about narcotics and provide extracurricular
activities and counseling services to help them avoid illegal drugs. (Solution)
Problem-Cause-Solution Pattern
• In the 1st main point, you identify a problem.
• In the 2nd main point, you analyze the cause(s) of the problem.
• Example
• Main Point #1
• During the new year’s, scores of people are injured or killed in road accidents.
(Problem)
• Main Point #2
• The main causes of these accidents are drunk driving and the lack of police
officers on patrol. (Cause)
• Main Point #3
• A solution will be for the city administrators to impose a ban on the selling of
alcohol and to strictly enforce road safety rules by assigning an adequate police
force on main highways and areas that are accident-prone. (Solution)
• Example
• Main Point #1
• Our city is no longer safe. (Claim)
• Main Point #2
• Last year the city was crippled by violent protests which led to deaths, injuries,
and damage to property. (Reason)
• Main Point #3
• This year much of the surrounding areas have been hit by intense flooding.
(Reason)
• Main Point #4
• Every year scores of people are killed in roadside accidents or victimized by
growing crime. (Reason)
Criteria-Satisfaction Pattern
• Set a standard that will be used to judge a proposal or solution.
• Example
• Main Point #1
• Sandbags and dykes can only hold up against a limited amount of floodwater
temporarily. (Negative)
• Main Point #2
• On the other hand, canals and waterways have a limited capacity in terms of
water volume. (Negative)
• Main Point #3
• The only real solution to save the city from future flooding is to build a modern,
extensive drainage system. (Solution)
• You compare your solution to others, and describe how yours is the better way.
• Example
• Main Point #1
• Renting DVDs costs much less than going to the cinema because the price of a
rented DVD can be 3 times less than that of a movie ticket.
• Main Point #2
• Renting DVDs can save you more time than going to the cinema because you
can watch them at home during your leisure time instead of having to wait at the
movie theater.
Monroe’s Motivated Sequence*
• A 5-step sequence used for policy speeches that seek immediate action.
• Attention
• Need
• Satisfaction
• Visualization
• Action
Supporting Materials
Use supporting materials to help you when you are presenting.
• Examples
• Statistics
• Testimony or Witness
• Identify the people you quote unless they don’t want you to.
• Does the story represent the world? Does it have a good message to tell?
Claim
Datum
Warrant
• Datum/Data:
• Any particular fact or opinion that is believed by the listener
• In rhetoric truth is relative.
• Warrant:
• A general belief held by the audience which makes the claim acceptable to them
based on the datum
Warrant is more general while datum is more specific. A warrant connects the datum to
the claim.
• Types of Warrants
• Motivational: based on assumptions regarding values, emotions, motivations, &
desires
• Authoritative: based on assumptions concerning the credibility of the data
source or speaker
• Example
• Claim
• You should exercise regularly.
• Datum
• Exercise will improve your health and appearance.
• Warrant
• You want to be healthy, strong, and good-looking. (Motivational Warrant)
• Example
• Claim
• You should exercise regularly.
• Datum
• The doctor told you that exercise will improve your health and appearance.
• Warrant
• The should listen to the doctor because she is an expert in health. (Authoritative
Warrant)
• Example
• Claim
• You should exercise regularly.
• Datum
• Good health will help you have a better, happier life.
• Warrant
• You have friends who exercise regularly and are strong and good-looking.
(Substantive Warrant)
• Cause-& Effect: datum is the cause & the claim is the effect or vice versa
• Sign: correlation; the presence of one thing (datum) entails that of the other
(claim)
• Analogy: if two or more things are alike in one way, they must be alike in other
ways; datum is the observed characteristic, the warrant assumes they have other
characteristics in common, & the claim asserts that one has the same
characteristic as the other
Analogy has two types: literal analogy and figurative analogy. Literal analogy compares
things that are essentially similar, whereas figurative analogy compares things that are
apparently not.
We can also say ‘group’ to substitute for ‘class.’ Generalization and classification can be
effective when people tend to think stereotypically.
As a modern persuasive speaker you can try to combine techniques from both Aristotle
and Toulmin.
When making your argument, you state your claim and datum but not the warrant (not
usually).
Aristotle + Toulmin
• For every claim you must have data and a warrant to support it.
• You can base your argument on ethos (of the speaker or source) or the self-
interest of the audience.
• Datum
• Our teacher advised us to start our project.
• Warrant
• The teacher knows best how we can get a good grade on the project.
• Datum
• If you study hard and get good grades, you will find good jobs and will earn lots
of money.
• Warrant
• We want to make a lot of money.
• If the audience does not accept the datum of your first argument, you will then
have to add more arguments.
• In the next argument, the datum will become the claim, which you will have to
support with other data and a warrant.
(First Argument)
• Claim
• The government should build a more efficient water drainage system.
• Datum
• Without a modern drainage system the city will be helpless against future mass
floods.
• Warrant
• We do not want to suffer from flooding anymore.
In this example, the audience rejected the datum in the first argument. Therefore, you
must add another argument. The datum from the first argument becomes the claim of
the second argument.
(Second Argument)
• Claim
• Without a modern drainage system the city will be helpless against future mass
floods.
• Datum
• We and other provinces are now experiencing a flood crisis.
• Warrant
• The water drainage system is outdated and insufficient.
***