Survey 1
Survey 1
Survey 1
2. Review of Techniques
2.1 Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs)
Overview: CNNs have been the cornerstone of image classification tasks due to their ability to
learn spatial hierarchies of features. Various architectures like VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, and
Inception have been adapted for skin cancer classification.
Specific Approaches:
VGG and ResNet: In [7], ResNet, DenseNet, and Inception were employed, showing the benefits
of deep architectures in capturing intricate details in dermoscopic images.
CapsNet: In [6], CapsNet was utilized, demonstrating its potential in handling spatial
hierarchies and improving classification accuracy for dermoscopic images.
5. Future Directions
5.1 Research Gaps
Data Diversity: There is a need for more diverse and representative datasets to ensure model
generalizability across different populations.
Model Interpretability: Future research should focus on developing models that are not only
accurate but also interpretable, allowing clinicians to understand the rationale behind
predictions.
5.2 Emerging Trends
Transformers and Attention Mechanisms: The increasing use of transformers and attention modules
indicates a shift towards more sophisticated architectures that can capture global and
contextual information effectively.
Hybrid Models: Combining deep learning with other AI techniques, such as reinforcement learning
or probabilistic models, may offer new avenues for improving classification accuracy.
6. Conclusion
This survey has provided a detailed review of recent advances in deep learning for skin cancer
classification. The integration of novel architectures, such as transformers and attention
mechanisms, alongside traditional CNNs, has led to significant improvements in model accuracy and
robustness. However, challenges such as class imbalance, computational complexity, and the need for
explainable models remain. Addressing these issues in future research will be crucial for the
successful deployment of these models in clinical settings.