2clancian Case Scenario 2
2clancian Case Scenario 2
2clancian Case Scenario 2
CL 2025 | SECTION 1
CYBER CRIME INVESTIGATION
CASE SCENARIO # 2
1. Assuming that this occurred in the Philippines, what cybercrime(s) were
committed? Why do you believe that? Give an explanation and cite the exact
laws violated.
The cybercrimes committed in this scenario could include:
Cyberbullying and Online Harassment: The online attacks, harassment, verbal
abuse, and threats directed at Kim Soo Hyun and Kim Ji Won constitute
cyberbullying and online harassment under the Philippine Cybercrime Prevention Act
of 2012 (Republic Act No. 10175). The law prohibits acts of cyberbullying, defined as
the use of information and communication technology to intimidate, harass, or cause
harm to others.
Defamation: The spread of false and damaging information questioning the honesty
and integrity of Hyun and Won, along with their family members, constitutes
defamation. Defamation through electronic means is covered under the Philippine
Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012, particularly in its provisions on libel and cyber
libel.
Under Philippine laws, these cybercrimes can be cited as follows:
a. Republic Act No. 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012: This law covers
cyberbullying, online defamation, and hate crimes committed through information
and communication technologies.
b. Republic Act No. 10173 or the Data Privacy Act of 2012: This law may apply in
cases of identity theft, as it protects the privacy rights of individuals and regulates the
processing of personal data.
c. Republic Act No. 9262 or the Anti-Violence Against Women and Their Children Act
of 2004: This law may be applicable if the cybercrimes committed resulted in
physical or psychological harm to women and their children, including Kim Ji Won
and her family.
2. What pieces of digital evidence you will need to investigate the cybercrimes
committed if any? Explain the importance of each evidence.
To investigate the cybercrimes committed in this scenario, several pieces of
digital evidence would be crucial. These pieces of evidence help establish the
facts, identify the perpetrators, and understand the motives behind the online
harassment and defamation of Kim Soo Hyun and Kim Ji Won. The importance of
each evidence is explained below:
Online Posts and Messages: Copies of the online posts, messages,
comments, and threats made against Hyun and Won would serve as
crucial digital evidence.
IP Addresses and User Data: Identifying the IP addresses and user data
associated with the accounts responsible for the cyberbullying and
defamation would aid in tracing the perpetrators.
Digital Forensic Analysis: Analysis of digital footprints, metadata, and
timestamps on the defamatory content can provide insights into the origin
and dissemination of false information.
3. Would your answers to the above questions change if you were in a different
country? Please justify your explanation.
The answers to the questions related to safeguards against cybercrimes and the
situation faced by Kim Soo Hyun and Kim Ji Won might change if we were in a
different country. The specific cybercrime laws and legal frameworks vary from
country to country. In the Philippines, cyberbullying and defamation are explicitly
addressed under the Cybercrime Prevention Act. However, in different countries, the
legal definitions and penalties for these offenses may differ. Therefore, the
application of laws and procedures in investigating and prosecuting cybercrimes
would vary depending on the jurisdiction.