April 2018 1522658847 49
April 2018 1522658847 49
April 2018 1522658847 49
net/publication/382889805
CITATIONS READ
0 1
4 authors, including:
Suparna Kumar
Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences
1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Suparna Kumar on 06 August 2024.
Medicine
Dr. Abhishek Department of Pharmacology, College of Medicine & JNM Hospital, Kalyani, West
Ghosh* Bengal* Corresponding Author
3rd Prfessional part 2 MBBS student, College of Medicine & JNM Hospital, Kalyani, West
Suparna Kumar Bengal
ABSTRACT
Background- Cardiovascular disease is recognized as the leading cause of morbidity, mortality. The known risk factors are advanced age, obesity,
high cholesterol, high blood pressure, diabetes mellitus. Due to shift work, nursing staffs are at increased risk of having these risk factors.
Methods- It was a cross sectional study involving 102 female nursing staffs in a government Medical college hospital in Westbengal. Following
parameters were measured- Age, Family history, Body weight, Drug history, Blood pressure,Random blood sugar, Total cholesterol, LDL
Cholesterol, HDL cholesterol,Triglyceride.
Results- Our study revealed strong correlation between body weight and mean BP, random blood sugar, total cholesterol, triglyceride level, strong
correlation between blood sugar and total and LDL cholesterol level. Mean BP is significantly correlated with cholesterol level.
Conclusions- Prevalence of dyslipidemia among nursing staffs is more than the general population. Being shift worker,due to increased
dyslipidemia prevalence,they have higher chance of developing cardiovascular disease early.
KEYWORDS
Nurses, Dyslipidemia, mean Blood pressure, random blood sugar
Results cholesterol level was 101.53 mg/dl, which is higher than the current
Data from 102 nursing staffs were collected during the study. The normal level of LDL cholesterol (100 mg/dl). Mean triglyceride level
mean age of the nurses were 46.18 years, and mean weight was 62.11 of the staffs were 149.4 mg/dl, which was within normal range (upto
Kg. Mean of the random blood sugar level of the staffs came out 102.58 150 mg/ dl). Mean HDL cholesterol was 50.91 mg/dl, which is in
mg/ dl. only 4 of them had random sugar level above 140 mg/dl, which normal range.
is above the normal random blood sugar level. Mean Blood pressure of
the staffs (which is equal to diastolic blood pressure+ 1/3 rd of pulse
pressure) was 94.14 mm of Hg. The study aimed to see correlation of different biochemical parameters
with body weight and also to see correlation among age and blood
12 staffs (11.76%) among the study population are diabetic and 19 pressure, age and cholesterol level, blood sugar and cholesterol level,
(18.63%) had hypertension and they were receiving drugs for blood sugar and triglyceride level.
controlling these.According to lipid profile result, 42 nursing staffs are
dyslipidemic (41.17%). So, Pearson's correlation test was done.
It revealed the following data-
Mean total cholesterol level was 173.88 mg/ dl, whereas mean LDL Correlations
Table 1: correlation study of different cardiovascular risk factors among nursing staffs
Weight mean BP Random blood Total LDL Triglyceride
sugar cholesterol cholesterol
weight Pearson Correlation 1 .300** .314** .216* .152 .287**
Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .001 .029 .126 .003
N 102 102 102 102 102 102
mean BP Pearson Correlation .300** 1 .132 .220* .125 .282**
Sig. (2-tailed) .002 .188 .026 .209 .004
N 102 102 102 102 102 102
Random blood Pearson Correlation .314** .132 1 .232* .274** .137
sugar Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .188 .019 .005 .171
N 102 102 102 102 102 102
Total Pearson Correlation .216* .220* .232* 1 .916** .503**
cholesterol Sig. (2-tailed) .029 .026 .019 .000 .000
N 102 102 102 102 102 102
LDL cholesterol Pearson Correlation .152 .125 .274** .916** 1 .381**
Sig. (2-tailed) .126 .209 .005 .000 .000
N 102 102 102 102 102 102
Triglyceride Pearson Correlation .287** .282** .137 .503** .381** 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .004 .171 .000 .000
N 102 102 102 102 102 102
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
So the study revealed the following- staffs were similar to one similar study but prevalence of dyslipidemia
1. Body weight of the study population and their mean BP had very was much higher in our study.
significant correlation ( 2 tailed significance 0.002)
2. Body weight of the study population and their random blood sugar A study on total of 424 rail road workers between the ages of 21 and 64
level had very significant correlation (2 tailed significance 0.001) years showed that high serum total cholesterol and LDL-C level were
3. Body weight of the study population and their total cholesterol more common in shift workers than in day workers. This finding
level had significant correlation (2 tailed significance 0.029) persisted after adjustment was made for age and food type. But there
4. Body weight of the study population and their LDL cholesterol was no difference in the prevalence of fasting blood glucose and
level didn't have significant correlation (2 tailed significance hypertension between shift working and day working.8 This result
0.126) supported our study finding that nursing staffs, being shift worker had
5. Body weight of the study population and their triglyceride level increased prevalence of dyslipidemia and thus, have increased risk of
had very significant correlation (2 tailed significance 0.003) cardiovascular disease in future.
6. Mean BP and total cholesterol level had significant correlation (2
tailed significance 0.026). Another study on 493 nurses, nurse technicians and assistants, in a
7. Mean BP and triglyceride level had very significant correlation (2 large general hospital setting, night shift work did not increase blood
tailed significance 0.004) pressure and was not associated with hypertension or pre-hypertension
8. Random blood sugar level and total cholesterol level had in nursing personnel.9 Here in our study also, there was no increased
significant correlation ( 2 tailed significance 0.019) prevalence of hypertension among nursing staffs.
9. Random blood sugar level and LDL cholesterol level had
Correlation studies done in this study revealed strong correlation
significant correlation ( 2 tailed significance 0.005)
between body weight and mean BP, body weight and random blood
10. Random blood sugar level and triglyceride level didn't have
sugar, body weight and total cholesterol, body weight and triglyceride
significant correlation (2 tailed significance 0.171)
level, which is a well known fact.
11. Total cholesterol and triglyceride level had very significant
Our study also depicted strong correlation between blood sugar level
correlation ( 2 tailed significance was less than 0.001)
and total cholesterol level, LDL cholesterol level and this is supported
12. LDL cholesterol and triglyceride level had very significant
by a previous study, where among 401 patients, Patients with HbA1c
correlation ( 2 tailed significance was less than 0.001)
value greater than 7.0% had significantly higher value of cholesterol,
13. Also, correlation between age and mean BP, age and total
LDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C ratio compared with patients with an
cholesterol was measured. It reveled that age of the subject had
HbA1c value up to 7.0%.10
very significant correlation with both mean BP and total
cholesterol level ( in both the cases, 2 tailed significance was less
We have also found that mean blood pressure is significantly
than 0.001).
correlated with high cholesterol level.in a large cross sectional study
on approximate 16000 subjects, it was found that Total and non-HDL
Discussion
cholesterol levels increased significantly with increasing systolic or
The present study aimed to assess presence of existing CVD risk diastolic blood pressure in both sexes.11
factors among nursing staffs of a government medical college hospital
in eastern India.
Though diabetes, hypertension and diabetes mellitus are known risk
factors for development of cardiovascular disease, their prevalence
In our study, prevalence of hypertension, diabetes among nursing
46 International Journal of Scientific Research
Volume-7 | Issue-4 | April-2018 PRINT ISSN No 2277 - 8179
among nursing staffs have not been studied much. Their workload and
responsibility towards health care system is immensely important for
society. So early detection of these risk factors among nursing staffs is
very important, so that proper lifestyle measures and drug therapy can
reduce the chance of development of cardiovascular disease among
them.
Conclusions :
This cross sectional study revealed that prevalence of dyslipidemia
among nursing staffs of a government medical college hospital is more
than the general population. Prevalence of hypertension and diabetes
mellitus is comparable to general population. There is strong
correlation between body weight and mean BP, body weight and
random blood sugar, body weight and total cholesterol, body weight
and triglyceride level, between blood sugar level and total cholesterol
level, between mean blood pressure and blood sugar, mean blood
pressure and total cholesterol level. Thus nursing staffs, being shift
duty worker, due to increased dyslipidemia prevalence, may have
higher chance of developing cardiovascular disease early.
References
1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-
2020: Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 1997; 349:1498-504.
2. Gupta R, Joshi P, Mohan V, Reddy KS, Yusuf S. Epidemiology and causation of coronary
heart disease and stroke in India. Heart 2008; 94:16-26.
3. Reddy KS, Shah B, Varghese C, Ramadoss A. Responding to the challenge of chronic
diseases in India. Lancet 2005; 366:1744-9.
4. Smith SC, Greenland P, Grundy SM. AHA Conference Proceedings: Prevention
Conference V: beyond secondary prevention: Identifying the high-risk patient for
primary prevention: Executive summary: American Heart Association. Circulation
2000; 101:111-6.
5. Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in
Adults. Executive Summary of the 3 rd Report of the National Cholesterol Education
Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA 2001; 285:2486-97.
6. Chih-Ming LIN and Chung-Yi LI. Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factorsin
Taiwanese Healthcare Workers. Industrial Health 2009, 47, 411–418.
7. Salim Yusuf, Srinath Reddy, Stephanie Ôunpuu and Sonia Anand. Global Burden of
Cardiovascular Diseases: Part I: General Considerations, the Epidemiologic Transition,
Risk Factors, and Impact of Urbanization. Circulation: Journal of The American Heart
Association 2001;104:2746-2753
8. Ghiasvand M, Heshmat R, Golpira R, Haghpanah V, Soleimani A, Shoushtarizadeh P,
Tavangar SM, Larijani B. Shift working and risk of lipid disorders: A cross-sectional
study Lipids Health Dis. 2006; 5: 9
9. Sfreddo C, Fuchs SC, Merlo ÁR, Fuchs FD (2010) Shift Work Is Not Associated with
High Blood Pressure or Prevalence of Hypertension. PLOS ONE 5(12): e15250.
10. Hussain A, Ali I, Ijaz M, Rahim A. Correlation between hemoglobin A1c and serum lipid
profile in Afghani patients with type 2 diabetes: hemoglobin A1c prognosticates
dyslipidemia, Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Apr; 8(4): 51–57.
11. Bønaa KH, Thelle DS. Association between blood pressure and serum lipids in a
population. The Tromsø Study. Circulation. 1991;83:1305-1314