Nikolaj e Vic 1997
Nikolaj e Vic 1997
Nikolaj e Vic 1997
Relative dielectric constants of the materials used in 10.4 2.13 2.14 2.14
numerical models are listed in Table 1. 20.5 2.15 2.16 2.16
40.4 2.16 2.18 2.17
3.15.3
The EE on the top of the high dielectric constant made the situation worse. The EE at greater distance,
layer had a complex effect on the electric field 12 mm, according to the numerical simulation, could
grading: be a good solution for the cable termination.
0 The insulated EE even made the electric stress Grounded EE was found to be a good solution, apart
stronger. The situation was found to be worse when from the distance.
the EE was closer to the screen end.
When the EE was grounded, maximum electric When the relative dielectric constant was much
filed was reduced, see Table-3. The electric stress greater than 10, the electric field intensity was not
transferred from the insulation screen end to the EE found to change much with the presence of the EE.
and the surrounding material. When the EE was grounded, the greatest electric
stress moved from the insulation screen end to the
TABLE-3. Maximum values of the electric field EE.
Emax (MV/m) in the cable insulator near the screen
end for different permittivitv layers and the EE at the
distance 5 or 12 mm from the screen end. Shaded CONCLUSION
areas stand for confgurations which have no point,
where Emax>Edmax. Cable terminations should be made of material with
relative dielectric constarit E, =10 of more. The
Er "5 5" 12" 12" thickness of the layer d=l mm, was found to be
non grounded non grounded sufficient, and there was no point in increasing it.
The same effect may be achieved with a layer of
~ , = 5 but,
, the thickness must be grater. The layer of
10 cm length was found to be sufficiently long.
.\ \ \ I / /-A
S
Figure 1. The potential map of the classic cable termination. The electric field controlled at the cable
insulation screen end by geometric stress relief-stress relief cone.
Figure 2. The potential map of the cable termination with a high relative dielectric constant layer
(E, =I 0.4) beginning at the cable insulation screen end. The HST on the top.
Figure 3. The potential map of the cable termination with high relative dielectric constant layer
(E, =10.4) and the embedded electrode (EE) at the “floating” potential. The HST on the top.
Figure 4. The potential map of the cable termination with high relative dielectric constant layer
(E, =10.4) and the embedded electrode (EE) at the ground potential. The HST on the top.