Batch 1: Case Law

February 5, 2024
Doctrine of Preferred Freedom (Hierarchy of Rights)
1. Social Justice Society, et al. v. Atienza, Jr., GR No. 156052, Feb. 13, 2008
2. Carlos Superdrug Corp v. DSWD, et al., GR No. 166494, Jun. 29, 2007
3. PBM Employees Org v. PBM Co., Inc., 51 SCRA 189 (1973)
Police Power
1. MMDA v. Garin, GR No. 130239, Apr. 15, 2005
Test of Police Power
1. Balacuit v. CFI, GR No. L-38429, Jun. 30, 1988
2. Lozano v. Matinez, 146 SCRA 323 (1986)
3. Del Rosario v. Bengzon, 180 SCRA 521 (1989)
4. Tablarin v. Gutierrez, 152 SCRA 730 (1987)
5. Carlos Superdrug Corp v. DSWD, et al., GR No. 166494, Jun. 29, 2007
Zoning and Regulatory Ordinances
1. Ermita-Malate Hotel & Motel Operators v. City Mayor, 20 SCRA 849 (1967)
2. Cruz v. Paras, 123 SCRA 569 (1983)
3. Velasco v. Villegas, 120 SCRA 568 (1983)
4. Magtajas v. Pryce Properties, 234 SCRA 255 (1994)
5. Tano v. Socrates, GR No. 110249, Aug. 27, 1997
6. City of Manila v. Judge Laguio, GR No. 118127, Apr. 12, 2005
7. Ortigas v. Feati Bank, 94 SCRA 719
8. Presley v. Bel-Air Village Association, 201 SCRA 13
9. Pasong Baybas Farmers Association v. CA, GR No. 142359 and 142980, May 25, 2004
Administrative Rules and Regulations
1. Bautista v. Junio, 127 SCRA 329 (1984)
2. Taxicab Operators of Metro Manila v. BOT, 119 SCRA 597 (1982)
3. Mirasol v. DPWH, GR No. 158793, Jun. 8, 2006
4. Anglo-Fil Trading v. Lazaro, 124 SCRA 494 (1983)
5. PPA v. Cipres Stevedoring, GR No. 145742, Jul. 14, 2005
6. Chavez v. Romulo, GR No. 157036, Jun. 9, 2004
Batch 2: CASES FOR POLICE POWER

I. Characteristics
a. Stone vs Mississippi
b. Ichong vs Hernandez
II. Who exercises Police Power?
a. Congress
 b. President
c. Lawmaking bodies
III. Extent of Judicial Review
a. Zabal vs Pres Duterte GR 238467

IV. Limitations
a. Ichong vs Hernandez

V. Requisites of Police Power

a. Lawful subject
i. William Kwong Management Inc vs Diamond
Homeowners and Residents Association ii. Ynot vs IAC

iii. Association of Medical Clinics for Overseas Workers vs GCC Approved

Medical Centers
iv. Basco et al vs PAGCOR
v. Peopl vs Nitifan, GR 81559-60
vi. Gaston vs Republic Planters Bank
vii. SUNECO vs ERC
viii. Velasco vs Villegas ix. Dela cruz vs Paras GR No L-42571-72
x. Bautista vs Junio
xi. Ermita Malate Hotel vs City Mayor of Manila GR L-
24693 xii. City of Manila vs Laguio

xiii. White light Corporation vs City of Manila

xiv. Lutz vs Araneta
xv. Osmena vs Orbos GR 99886
xvi. Association of Small Landowners vs Secretary of
Agrarian Reform xvii. Manila Memorial Park inc vs Secretary of
Department of Social Welfare and Development GR 175356
xviii. Department of Education vs San Diego xix. Taxicab Operators of
Metro Manila vs BOT

xx. Balacuit vs CFI of Agusan del Norte GR L-38429

xxi. UBFHAI vs City of Mayor of Paranaque
xxii. MMDA vs Viron Transit Co

b. Lawful means

i. Association of Medical Clinics for Overseas Workers vs GCC Approved

Medical Centers
ii. Lorenzo vs Director of Health
iii. City of Quezon City vs Ericta
iv. Office of Solicitor General vs Ayala Land Inc
v. Fernando vs St Scholastica’s College
VI. Standards for Judicial Review
a. Strict Scrutiny
b. Rational Basis standard
c. Overbreadth doctrine
 d. Void for vagueness doctrine
i. Disini vs Executive Secretary
Batch 3: Picture Format

Batch 4:
Right to travel and abode
1. Marcos v. Manglapus [TAMBONG]
2. Manotoc v. CA [VIOLENTA]
3. Genuino v. De Lima [GONZALES]
4. Marcos v. Sandiganbayan - HADJI
5. SPARKS v. QC [MANTUA]
Right to Information
1. Chavez v. Public Estates Authority
2. Re: Request for Copy of 2008 SALN June 13, 2012 [NORTEGA]
Rights of the Accused
a. Free access to courts and adequate legal assistance
b. Right against unreasonable searches and seizure
i. Valid warrantless searches and seizures
1. People v. Idel Amminnudin [SANTOS]
2. People v. Mengote [GAYO]
3. People v. Binad Sy Chua [ASARES]
4. People v. Anita Claudio
5. People v. Quebral [ESTRADA]
6. People v. Manlulu [AYADO]
7. People v. Joselito del Rosario (Maglines)
8. People v. Olivares [AMANTE]
9. Robin Padilla v. CA [PRAJES]
10. People v. Abriol
11. Abelita III v. P Doria
12. People v. Gerente [CASTILLON]
13. Rolito Go v. CA [Pangilinan]
14. Luz v. People [CABANOS]
15. Ongcoma Hadi Homar v. People
16. People v. Salanguit (ZAFRA)
17. People v. Tiu Won Chua [ALVIZO]
18. People v. Estella [NACIONAL]
19. People v. Tampis (TORRALBA)
20. People v. Go [MANEJA]
21. Salvador v. People [CAINGLES]
22. Silahis Int’l Hotel v. Saluta
23. Valdez v. People 538 SCRA 811 [LUZON]
24. Terry v. Ohio (Tuso)
25. Posadas v. CA (ESPILOY)
26. Manalili v. CA (CONDEZA)
27. Malacat v. CA [DOLLISEN]
28. People v. Escano (RESPUESTO)
29. People v. De Gracia [IMAM]
30. Guanzon v. Villa (Molde)
31. People v. Suzuki (LADAGA)
32. People v. Johnson (DUMAPIAS)
33. Valmonte v. De Villa (OLMOGUEZ)
34. People v. Doria (RUEL)
35. Del Rosario v. People [MAGLINES]
36. People v. Andre Marti [ONYOT]
37. Waterous Drug Corp v. NLRC [CARCASONA]
 38. People v. Bongcarawan [ABUZO]
39. Marieta De Castro v. People (TOREŃA)
c. Rights under custodial investigation
1. Government of HK v. Olalia [ESCOBEDO]
d. Right to a speedy disposition of their cases
1. Tatad v. Sandiganbayan [ARANAS]
2. Cagang v. Sandiganbayan [PALER]
3. People v. Sandiganbayan G.R. No. 240776 [LADIA]

Batch 5
CUSTODIAL INVESTIGATION

1. People vs Mahinay
2. Morales v Enrile
3. People vs De Jesus
4. People vs Duenas GR 151286
5. People vs Andan 269 SCRA 95
6. People vs Bravo
7. Galman v Pamaran

8. Spontaneous Statements/Extrajudicial Confession

a. People v Abayon, 114 SCRA 197 (1982)
b. People v Alvarez
c. People vs Bermas
d. People vs Janson
e. People vs Encipido
f. People v Tawat
9. Independent and competent counsel
a. People vs Labatan GR 127493
b. People vs Hijada
c. People vs Andan GR 116437
10.Questioning
a. Jesalva People
b. People vs Dacanay GR 216064
c. People vs Domantay
d. People vs TAN 286 SCRA 207
e. People vs Bariquit
f. People vs Bolanos
11.Waiver
a. People v Fabro GR 95089
Batch 6 / Last Batch
RIGHT TO BAIL

Sec 13, Art III, 1987 Constitution

When can the right to post bail be invoked?

1. Teehankee v Rovira 75 Phil 634

2. Adapon v Domagtoy
3. Paderanga vs CA GR 115407

Right to post bail during suspension of writ of habeas corpus

What is bail?
Sec 1, Rule 114
Bail as a matter of right

4. Dela Ramos v People’s Court 77 phil 461

5. Sy Guan v Amparo GR L-1771

Bail as a matter if discretion

6. Obosa v CA
7. Francisco Yap Jr v CA
8. Robin Padilla vs CA
9. Boringa v Tamin

Bail not allowed

10.People v Crecencia Reyes

11.People v Hu Ruey Chun GR 158064
12.People v Vleriano GR 103604-05

Right to bail not applicable

13.Commendador v De Villa

Bail based on humanitarian reasons

14.Enrile v Sandiganbayan
15.Dela Rama v People’s Court

Amount of Bail

16.Sunga v Salud, 109 SCRA 253

17.Almeda v Villa Luz
18.Villasenor v Abano
 19.Francisco Yap Jr vs CA

Nature of the proceedings in application for bail

20.In Re: COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE ELMA

Effect of jumped bail

21.People v Agbulos
22.People v Valeriano

Hearing for bail

23.Tucay v Judge Domagas

24.Galvez c CA

Bail in extradition

25.Govt of US vs Purganan
26.Rodriguez et al vs Hon Presiding Judge RTC Manila Branch 17

RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED

Presumption of Innocence

27.People v Dramayo
28.Alejandro v Pepito
29.Dumlao v COMELEC GRL 52245
30.Suarez VS ca

NO PERSON SHALL BE HELD TO ANSWER FOR A CRIMINAL OFFENSE WITHOUT DUE

PROCESS OF LAW

31.Gallego v Sandiganbayan
32.People v Ramirez, GR L300635-6
33.Embuscado v People
34.Babanto vs Zosa
35.People v Legaspi 246 SCRA 206 GR 92167-68
36.People v Hermosilla
37.people V corral gr l-73604
38.People v Ortega jR
39.people V Rama gr 144386
40.People v Abiera GR 93947

SPEEDY TRIAL
Definition

1. Andres v Cacdac
2. Bernat v SAB e al
3. Velancia v SB GR NO 165996
 4. People v Sandiganbayan et al GR 199151056

Waiver of right to speedy trial

5. Uy v Hon Adriano
RIGHT TO PUBLIC TRIAL

6. Garcia v Domingo
7. Rule 119, Sec 21 of ROC
RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION

8. People v Dela Cruz GR L-33030

9. People v Santos GR L-62072
10.People v Biruar 130 Scra 513
11.Osias vs Court of Appeals
TRIAL IN ABSENTIA
What are the elements?

12.Nolasco v Enrile
Effect

13.People v Mapalao
14.Carredo v People GR77542
RIGHT AGAINST INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE
Ratio
Bailey v Alabama
Sarmiento v Tuico
Exception

1. Sec 18 par 2 of Article. III of the Constitution

2. People v Lagman and De sosa
3. Robertson v Baldwin
4. US v Pompeya
5. Kapisanan ng Manggagawa sa kahoy v Gotamco Sawmills

DOUBLE JEOPARDY
Sec 21 Art III
2 kinds of Double Jeopady

1. Yap v Lutero
Requisites for double jeopardy

2. People v Bocar GR L-27935

3. Paulin et al Gimenez GR 103323
4. People v Ting GR 225105
5. Ivler v San Pedro GR 172716
6. Monico Jacob v SB GR 162206
7. Dimayacyac vs SB et al GR 136264
8. Suero v People GR 156408
9. Guerrero V ca GR 107211
 10.Tan et al v Barrios et al GR 85481-82
11.People v Verra GR 134732
12.Poto v People GR 143547
13.Paulin v Gimenez
14.People v Tagle
15.Condrada v People
16.Tan v People 604 Phil 68
17.People v Sandiganbayan GR 232197-98
18.People v Robles 105 Phil 1016
19.pEOPLE V jARDIN gr l-33037-42
20.pEOPLE V gINES
Appeal after acquittal

21.Paulin et al v Gimenez
22.People v Villalon
23.People v Ting
24.People v Hon Laggui
“same offense”

25.Nierras v Dacuycuy
26.People v Manungas
27.People v Turda
28.People v Tiozon GR 89823
29.Paera v People 664 Phil 630
30.Ivler v San Pedro
31.Melo v people
“supervening event”

32.People v Adil
33.People v Yorac

BILL OF ATTAINDER
What is bill of attainder

34.People v Ferrer
35.Cummings v Missouri
36.Recuerdo v People
Ex post facto law

- Definition
37.Lorenzo v Posadas
38.Hernandez v Albano
39.Subido Jr Sandiganbayan
40.Lacson v Exec Secretary GR 128096
41.Wright v CA et al