Veto FDD
Veto FDD
Veto FDD
October 2012
Dear Sir,
This is with reference to your request to provide a Company Analysis and Financial Due Diligence report (“FDD
Report”) covering the limited scope and for the purpose of potential listing of Veto Switchgears and Cables Pvt
Ltd (“the Company”) on the EMERGE Platform of the National Stock Exchange (NSE).
We enclose our Company Analysis and FDD Report dated October 22, 2012. This Company Analysis and FDD Report
is based on the information provided by the Company to us and also on the meetings with the Management of the
Company.
For the purpose of preparing the Company Analysis and FDD Report, we have not independently verified the
information provided by the Company or collected by us from other sources. CRISIL does not guarantee the
accuracy, adequacy or completeness of any information contained in such Reports. CRISIL especially states that it
has no financial liability whatsoever to you / Company / users of the Reports. CRISIL’s Reports submitted to NSE
do not constitute recommendations to list or not to list the Company on the SME Exchange.
All the Company Analysis and FDD Reports submitted by CRISIL are confidential and are meant for the internal
use only of NSE and should not be used for purpose other than the potential listing of the Company on SME
Exchange.
This Letter shall form an integral part of the Company Analysis and FDD Reports.
We appreciate the opportunity given to us to conduct financial due diligence on Veto Switchgears and Cables Pvt
Ltd.
Yours faithfully,
Mohit Modi
Director – CRISIL Research
Company Overview
Table of contents
Company Analysis 6
Company Overview 9
Executive Summary 13
Appendix 40
Scope of Work 44
Company Overview
Glossary of terms
AS – Accounting Standards MAT – Minimum Alternative Tax
bps – Basis points MIS – Management Information System
Capex – Capital expenditure Mn - million
CAGR – Cumulative average growth rate NDA – Non disclosure agreement
CC – Cash Credit PAT – Profit after tax
CFO – Chief Financial Officer PBT – Profit before tax
COGS – Cost of goods sold RM – Raw materials
CWIP – Capital work in progress SG&A – Selling, general and administrative
DRHP – Draft Red Herring Prospectus sq. ft. – Square feet
EBITDA – Earnings Before Interest Tax Depreciation and Amortisation SEZ – Special Economic Zone
EPS – Earnings per share w.e.f – With effect from
FG – Finished goods y-o-y – year-on-year
FIFO – First in first out
FS – Financial statements
FYXX – Financial year ended March 31, 20XX
GFA – Gross fixed assets
KG – Kilogram
Company Overview
Company Analysis
Company background
Incorporated in 2003 as a partnership firm called Veto Industries, the company’s name was changed to ‘Veto Switchgears and Cables’ in April 2007.
Subsequently in June 2007, the partnership firm was converted into a private limited entity and was re-named ‘Veto Switchgears and Cables Private Ltd’. The
company was rechristened as ‘Veto Switchgears and Cables Ltd’ (VSCL) in 2012. It manufactures and sells wires and cables and electrical accessories in India.
The product portfolio encompasses industrial, stand, telephone cables and co-axial wires, general and modular switches, ceiling and rechargeable fans,
compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) and other electrical accessories. Except for CFLs and fans (the production of which are outsourced), all products are
manufactured in Hardwar, Uttarakhand. Electrical accessories are sold under the ‘Veto’ brand while wires and cables are sold under the ‘Vimal Power’ brand.
The company is promoted by Veto Electropowers (India) Pvt. Ltd (VEIPL), which is a subsidiary of Gurnani Holding Pvt. Ltd, which in turn is owned by the
Gurnani family. VEIPL manufactures and exports wires and PVC cables to the Gulf countries.
Key positives
■ VSCL manufactures and sells wires, cables and electrical accessories. The company has a diversified product basket, which includes around 20 product
categories. It sells electrical accessories under the ‘Veto’ brand, and wires and cables under the ‘Vimal Power’ brand. In FY12, wires and cables
contributed 54% to Veto’s revenues and the rest was contributed by electrical accessories.
■ VSCL has an extensive presence in Rajasthan and derives 70% of its revenues from the state. The company is also present in Delhi, Gujarat, Madhya
Pradesh, West Bengal and Assam and has nearly 2,400 dealers overall. ‘Veto’ and ‘Vimal Power’ are well known brands in the north-western region of
India. The company leverages its dealer network by introducing new products or variants of existing products.
■ The company’s promoters have a long standing presence in PVC (polyvinyl chloride) wires and cables business, which has enabled the company to expand
the electrical accessories business and increase its dealer network in the domestic market.
■ VSCL stands to benefit from the healthy growth expected in the various segments - (a) Switchgears: Domestic switchgear market is expected to grow at 12-
15% with modular switches market posting the fastest growth, (b) Wires and Cables: Domestic wires and cables segment has grown at 25% CAGR over FY08-
12 and is expected to register steady growth in the future (c) Compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs): Volumes are expected to grow at 10% annually over the
next few years, and (d) Consumer appliances: Veto is present only in the fans business; the fan segment is expected to register healthy growth led by low
penetration levels especially in rural areas.
Company Overview
Key negatives
■ VSCL’s scale of operations is small and its product offerings are limited compared to the bigger players in the industry viz., Havells, KEI Industries, Anchor,
and others, which limit its bargaining power with dealers/distributors. We believe the company’s plan to establish itself in other geographies is likely to
take some time because it will have to invest in advertising and brand building.
■ VSCL’s operations are working capital intensive as reflected in its working capital cycle of 200 days. It has to maintain an inventory of two to three months
in anticipation of orders. It also gives credit of around 100 days to its dealers to counter intense domestic competition. However, it gets minimal credit
from its suppliers which include suppliers of copper and PVC/PVC compounds.
■ VSCL has strong inter-linkages with its group entities and in the past has extended and received interest free loans from promoters and other group
companies. However, VSCL’s reliance on related parties for debt funds has reduced over a period of time, as the company has substituted these loans with
bank loans.
■ Copper accounts for nearly 45% of Veto’s total raw material costs. The company is entirely dependent on a single supplier for sourcing of copper. The
company’s margins may be adversely affected in case it is unable to pass on the increases in copper prices to end consumers.
Company Overview
Key financials
■ VSCL’s operating income has grown at 20.8% CAGR over FY09-12 to Rs 686 mn led by management’s focus on augmenting distribution network, new product
launches and branding.
■ The company’s EBITDA margin has expanded to 16.2% in FY12 from 10.9% in FY11. We expect moderation in EBITDA margin going forward due to increase in
employee costs and marketing and advertising expenses.
■ Average PAT margin over FY10-12 was 9.6%. The company’s Hardwar plant received 100% income tax holiday over FY08-12. While Veto is liable to pay
minimum alternate tax (MAT), it set off its income tax with the MAT credit. Therefore, its effective tax rate was negligible during this period. Starting
FY13, the Hardwar plant is entitled to 30% income tax holiday for a period of five years.
Company Overview
Company Overview
Company Overview
Company Overview
Company Overview
Manufacturing process
Electrical Accessories Wires and Cables
Raw material Raw material
Moulding Brass Drawing of copper on drawing Packing Drawing of copper on drawing machine
Powder Parts machine material
Twisting & rewinding of copper on Twisting & Rewinding Machine
Injecting Moulding/Hand Moulding
Extruder—PVC lamination of PVC Compound on twisted copper as per required
Moulding goods to buffing machine for smoothing of edges size of wire
Worker table for tightening of brass parts Cutting Machine – Cutting of wire for coil size
Packing in cartons
Dispatch
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
Key Findings – Employee costs
Salary paid to key management personnel is on the lower side; Mr Dinesh Gurnani (whole-time director) and Mr P.V. Sharma (Group CFO) have
not drawn any salary in the past
Background Comments / implications Management Comments
■ Salaries paid to key management personnel are on the ■ The current salary cost may not be ■ Compensation to Mr Vishnu Gurnani has
lower side compared to their position/experience. representative of future costs. Salary been fixed at Rs 1.44 mn per annum
■ Mr Vishnu Gurnani (managing director) did not receive costs could increase post fund raising, and will be paid from FY13 onwards.
any salary during FY08-11, and received only Rs 79,000 as as the company attains higher scale of Similarly, Mr Dinesh Gurnani’s salary
compensation in FY12. operations. VSCL plans to add 100 has been fixed at Rs 0.6 mn per annum
employees post IPO. and will be paid from FY13 onwards.
■ Mr Dinesh Gurnani (whole-time director) has not received
any salary in the past. Group CFO, Mr P.V. Sharma, while ■ Given the size of the operations, the ■ Mr P.V. Sharma will continue to receive
involved in the operations of VSCL, does not receive any quantum of salary increase may have his salary from VEIPL, even though he
salary from the company. an adverse impact on profitability. will be involved in VSCL’s operations.
Employee cost as a percentage of sales ■ The company gives around 10% salary
■ Salaries of other key managerial personnel (other than
has decreased from 7.5% in FY11 to hikes to its employees each year and is
promoters) are also lower than market standards.
6.2% in FY12. likely to continue with this policy.
■ Mr Vishnu Gurnani, Mr Dinesh Gurnani and Mr P.V. Sharma
■ As there is no group-wide policy on Employee costs increased at a slower
hold key managerial positions in other group companies
payment of salaries to shared rate in FY12 as some high salaried
also. However, there is no group-wide policy for
management personnel, VSCL’s current employees left the company and were
allocation of cost between group entities, for shared
employee costs may not be appropriate not replaced.
resources.
in relation to the scale of its ■ The company has fixed sitting fees for
■ The company does not have a policy of paying sitting fees
operations. the directors at Rs 3,000 per board
to its board of directors. Independent directors have
meeting per member. The same will be
been appointed on the board of directors in August 2012.
paid for future board meetings.
Executive Summary
VSCL, in the past, has relied on its parent company and promoters for interest free loans for working capital
Background Comments / implications Management Comments
■ The company has relied on loans from related parties in the past ■ VSCL’s reliance on loans from related ■ In future, Veto Electricals Pvt.
to meet its working capital requirement. These loans are short parties has declined significantly by Ltd and VSCL’s other
term unsecured loans, with VEIPL as the main lender. FY12. Therefore, the current interest subsidiaries will raise equity
■ Outstanding loans from related parties have declined costs are reflective of the cost of capital only through allotment
substantially over the years. The current outstanding loan amount funds required for a business of this of equity shares to VSCL.
from related parties is less than Rs 1 mn compared to Rs 162 mn nature. Therefore, VSCL’s shareholding
in FY12. ■ In the future, transfer of funds in the company will increase to
between related parties is a key more than 90%.
■ VSCL has gradually substituted these interest free loans with
loans from banks. Further, loans amounting to Rs 47 mn were monitorable.
converted to equity shares.
■ VSCL has advanced Rs 18 mn (loans and advances) to related
parties as of FY12. Of this, Rs 17 mn was interest free loan to
Veto Electricals Pvt. Ltd for purchase of land at Mahindra World
City SEZ in Jaipur, Rajasthan. VSCL holds 90% stake in Veto
Electricals Pvt. Ltd. VEIPL and Mr Vishnu Gurnani hold the
balance 10%.
Executive Summary
Lease rental terms with related parties may not reflect commonly accepted market practices
Background Comments / implications Management Comments
■ VSCL has taken on lease 2,400 square feet of built up area ■ Monthly lease rental rate of Rs 5,000 ■ Not applicable
from its promoter Mr Vishnu Gurnani for monthly rent of Rs for corporate office premises is low
5,000. The lease rental is subject to increase at 10% per annum compared to market standards. The
(agreement date: August 9, 2012). In our opinion, the lease company’s rental expenses will
rental is below the market rate. increase in case the lease rates are
■ VSCL has taken on lease 2,500 square feet built up area from revised upwards.
Gurnani Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd for monthly rent of Rs ■ In our opinion, interest free security
15,000. The company has also given Rs 20 mn as interest free deposit of Rs 20 mn for leasing of
security deposit to the lessor (agreement date: August 8, warehouse space is high, given the
2012). nature of use of the property and the
monthly lease rental.
Executive Summary
Key Findings: Company needs to strengthen its quality of MIS and internal control
Revenue Analysis
Revenue details
■ VSCL’s operating income has grown to Rs 686 mn by FY12 at a three-year CAGR of
(Rs mn) FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 21% The company sells around 20 products, which can broadly be classified into
Manufactured goods sales 284 396 443 575 two categories – wires and cables and electrical accessories. The wires and cables
y-o-y change 57.0% 39.0% 12.0% 29.9% business contributed 54% and 58% to VSCL’s revenues in FY12 and FY11,
Traded goods sales 133 108 123 153 respectively. The rest was contributed by electrical accessories. We are unable to
y-o-y change 69.4% -18.7% 13.7% 24.7% comment on the revenue contribution prior to FY11 as the same has not been
Total gross sales 418 504 566 729 provided by the company.
y-o-y change 60.8% 20.6% 12.4% 28.7% ■ Sales of traded goods averaged 21% of total gross sales in the past three years.
Less: trade discount (28) (34) (35) (43) Traded goods include, among other products, CFLs and fans which VSCL does not
Trade discount as % of gross sales -6.8% -6.7% -6.1% -5.9% manufacture and has outsourced to local companies.
Net sales / operating income 389 470 531 686 ■ We are unable to comment on the historical growth in product realisations and
y-o-y change 55.9% 20.8% 13.1% 29.1% sales volumes as the company has not shared these data with us.
■ The company directly sells to dealers/retailers and has over 2,300 dealers as of
Distribution network FY12, most of them located in Rajasthan. VSCL derives its maximum revenue from
No. of dealers FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 Rajasthan (over 70%). In the recent years, it has ventured into other states
Number of dealers 1,366 1,878 2,187 2,375
including Gujarat, Delhi, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal and Assam. In the future,
the company intends to export electrical accessories.
Average revenue per
dealer (Rs) 284,952 250,288 243,022 288,798 ■ The company reports both gross sales and net sales – net of discount and duties.
For our analysis, we have used net sales.
■ VSCL’s dealer base has grown at around 20% CAGR over FY09-12, which we believe has led to revenue growth. As the company has increased its dealer
base, its average revenue per dealer has declined, except in FY12.
■ According to the management, VSCL has been able to pass on the increases in prices of key raw materials (such as copper, PVC/PVC compounds and others)
to end consumers. This is also reflected in the company’s raw material cost, which has remained constant at around 72% of sales over FY10-12.
Consequently, we believe that product realisations have also grown during the past few years.
■ As per our discussions with the management, the company added fans and CFLs to its product portfolio and has contributed around Rs 60 mn to the
company’s revenues in FY12. Remaining sales have been derived from existing products.
■ The company has given an average discount of 6% on sales to dealers. These are usually given to dealers placing large orders with the company or in order
to clear old inventory.
■ The company has two umbrella brands under which it sells all its products – ‘Veto’ and ‘Vimal Power’. While ‘Veto’ is owned by VSCL, ‘Vimal Power’ is
owned by its parent, VEIPL. VSCL has issued a ‘consent letter’ to VEIPL, permitting it to use the brand name ‘Veto’. VEIPL has also issued a ‘consent letter’
to VSCL, permitting it to use the brand name ‘Vimal Power’. However, these companies are not paying any royalty to each other.
■ ‘Veto’ was acquired by the promoters in 2006 for a sum of Rs 11,000, which in our opinion is very low.
■ Within its two umbrella brands, VSCL has other brands such as ‘Carino’, ‘Power’, ‘Puf’, ‘FM’ etc.
Seasonality of revenues
The company’s revenues are typically seasonal - Q2 contributes the highest sales, followed by Q4. Sales are usually higher in Q2 as this period is followed by
the festive season (Diwali) leading to strong demand for VSCL’s products in the residential real estate sector. Historical quarterly/half yearly revenue
breakdown is unavailable as the company has not maintained quarterly/half yearly financials in the past.
■ VSCL’s installed capacity for wires and cables is 14.08 lakh bundles whereas for electrical accessories it is 380 lakh pieces. The company increased its
capacity for manufacturing electrical accessories from 140 lakh pieces to 380 lakh pieces in FY11 in anticipation of growth in demand.
• Capacity expansion in FY10-11 in electrical accessories comprised investment of around Rs 25 mn in construction of additional space within the
company’s factory premises, investment in dies and furniture. This created space for more workers for the assembly operations and therefore
increased VSCL’s throughput capacity.
■ Production of electrical accessories declined from 91.43 lakh pieces in FY10 to 82.33 lakh pieces in FY12. As per the management:
• The company launched new products/brands during the initial years and ran promotional schemes to market new products. Therefore, volume offtake
from the dealers was higher in the initial years, leading to higher production.
• Company’s sales portfolio keeps changing and the same products may not contribute to sales in the same proportion each year. Therefore volumes
cannot be compared across the years.
■ Production of wires and cables declined in FY11 to 3.32 lakh bundles from 4.23 lakh bundles in FY10. As per the management, significant volatility in
copper prices in FY11 resulted in lower demand from end users, leading to lower capacity utilization in wires and cables manufacturing.
■ We have not been able to verify the product-wise production volume data, as the same was not available with the management.
■ Raw material cost as a percentage of sales has remained around 72% during FY10-12. We expect this to be on account of VSCL’s ability to pass on the
increases in raw material costs to end consumers. Nearly 100% of VSCL’s raw materials are procured domestically.
■ Copper is the key raw material and accounts for 45% of raw material costs as of FY12. Company’s sole copper supplier is Sterlite Industries. Other raw
materials include brass, aluminium and PVC/PVC compounds.
■ Purchase of traded goods includes, among other items, fans and compact fluorescent lamps, which the company purchases from other manufacturers to re-
sell under its own brand name.
Employee cost
Rs mn FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Salary, wages and bonus 27 33 37 39
Contribution to PF and other funds 2 2 2 2
Staff welfare expenses 1 1 1 2
Director’s remuneration - - - 0
Employee cost 30 37 40 42
As % of operating income 7.7% 7.8% 7.5% 6.2%
Number of employees 359 417 464 482
Cost per employee (Rs) 83,565 88,729 86,207 87,137
■ Employee cost as a percentage of sales has decreased from 7.7% in FY09 to 6.2% in FY12. We believe this is partly because of economies of scale.
■ According to the management, the company has historically given an average increase of 10-12% in salaries and wages. However, employee cost has grown
at around 7% in FY12. The management attributes this to some employees leaving the company during FY12. In our opinion, current employee cost is not
fully reflective of the true costs and therefore likely to increase going forward.
■ Members of the Gurnani family drew Rs 2.3 mn in salary from VSCL in FY12. The managing director, Mr Vishnu Gurnani, has received Rs 79,000 in salary in
FY12 and was not paid any salary during the earlier years. The company has fixed his remuneration at Rs 1.4 mn per annum going forward.
■ Mr Dinesh Gurnani, whole-time director, has not received any salary from VSCL in the past. According to the management, his remuneration has been fixed
at Rs 0.6 mn per annum from the current financial year.
■ During our interactions with the management, we learned that Mrs Pushpa Gurnani and Ms Jyoti Gurnani have ceased to be employees of VSCL and
therefore will not receive any remuneration from the company in the future.
Remuneration of promoters
Rs mn FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Vishnu Kumar Gurnani - - - 0.1
Rajesh Kumar Gurnani 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.2
Ragini Gurnani - - - 0.0
Dharam Gurnani 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2
Sarita Gurnani 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2
Pushpa Gurnani - 0.2 0.6 0.6
Jyoti Gurnani - 0.2 0.6 0.6
Priyanka Gurnani 0.1 - - -
Total 0.8 0.9 1.8 1.9
■ In our opinion, salaries of the key managerial personnel are on the lower side and the company may have to raise the salary levels if it has to retain the
key employees. Mr P.V. Sharma, Group CFO, receives his salary from VEIPL and not from VSCL.
■ VSCL came into existence starting June 20, 2007. Until FY12, the company followed the policy of accounting the gratuity on cash basis. However the same
was not in conformity with AS 15 prescribed by Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) in relation to disclosure of present value of obligations
with respect to the retirement/ future benefits to be paid to the employees and was in contravention of section 211(3C) of the Act. The Accounting
Standard stipulates that these liabilities should be accounted for in the books of accounts on accrual basis. The company has now created a gratuity fund
of Rs 34.64 mn and has obtained a gratuity bond dated August 28, 2012 from Life Insurance Corporation of India, and thus is in compliance with the
prescribed Accounting Standard.
• The company has paid a premium of Rs 3.2 mn towards the gratuity bond during FY13. Going forward, this premium is expected to amount to Rs 0.6-
0.7 mn per annum, as per our discussions with the management.
■ The paid up share capital of VSCL has increased beyond Rs 50 mn w.e.f. March 31, 2011. In terms of section 383A of the Companies Act, the company was
required to appoint a company secretary. Veto could not appoint the company secretary during FY12 but has obtained a compliance certificate from the
qualified practicing company secretary for the said year as required. However VSCL has appointed a whole time company secretary w.e.f. May 01, 2012.
■ Power and fuel forms a small proportion of the company’s total costs as it does not have manufacturing machineries which consume a large amount of
electricity.
■ Other manufacturing expenses (which include expenses such as factory rent, insurance, repairs to plant and building and others) as a percentage of sales
have decreased by around 1.4% in FY10 to 1.1% in FY12 due to economies of scale.
■ SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales have declined 2.4% in FY09 to 1.8% in FY12 primarily due to decline in advertising and sales promotion expenses.
VSCL’s advertising expenses include providing display boards for dealers and ‘Veto’ branded cloth bags, diaries and pens. According to the management,
these expenses are not necessarily linked to sales and are driven by dealers’ requirements. Therefore, they have declined in FY12, in spite of revenue
growth of 29% in that year. However, we find the same to be abnormal. Other SG&A costs include commission on sales and transportation, freight and
handling charges which form a small proportion.
■ The company does not have any policy for provisioning for bad and doubtful debts and product warranties.
■ Other expenses include rent, rates & taxes, travelling and conveyance, and other expenses. VSCL has leased the following properties from its related
parties:
• VSCL’s corporate office at Jaipur. The company has taken on lease 2,400 square feet of built up area from its promoter Mr Vishnu Gurnani for a
monthly rent of Rs 5,000. The lease rental is subject to increase at 10% per annum (agreement date: August 9, 2012). In our opinion, the lease rental is
below the market rate.
• VSCL’s branch office at Surat. The company has taken office space on lease from Gurnani Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd (promoter group company) for a
monthly rent of Rs 8,000. The lease rental is subject to increase at 5% per annum (agreement date: February 11, 2011).
• Warehouse at Jaipur. VSCL has taken on lease 2,500 square feet built up area from Gurnani Infra Developers Pvt. Ltd. for a monthly rent of Rs 15,000.
The company has also given Rs 20 mn as interest free security deposit to the lessor (agreement date: August 8, 2012).
EBITDA margin
Cost as a percentage of sales FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Raw material cost 73.5% 72.1% 72.0% 71.6%
Power and fuel 1.1% 1.0% 1.0% 0.9%
Other manufacturing expenses 1.0% 1.4% 1.2% 1.1%
Employee cost 7.7% 7.8% 7.5% 6.2%
Selling, general and administrative expenses 5.8% 5.5% 5.1% 4.1%
Total cost 89.1% 87.8% 86.8% 83.9%
EBITDA margin 10.9% 12.2% 13.3% 16.2%
■ The company has been able to improve its EBITDA margin over FY09-12 because of its ability to pass on the increase in raw material cost, low salary of key
management personnel and operating efficiencies. We expect VSCL’s EBITDA margin to moderate going forward as its employee costs and advertising
expenses are likely to rise as the company expands manufacturing, forays into new states and introduces new products.
Interest cost
Table below illustrates the break-up of interest cost over the period under review:
Rs mn FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Interest cost 7 7 12 24
Bank charges 1 1 1 1
Total 8 8 13 26
Year end debt 233 238 200 204
Interest rate on average debt (%) 4.0% 3.4% 5.9% 12.8%
■ Interest expense has increased significantly from FY09 to FY12. VSCL relied on interest free loans from related parties in the past due to which interest
costs were low at 4.0% in FY09. However, the company has gradually reduced its dependence on such loans and has replaced them with working capital
loans from banks. Further, unsecured loans amounting to Rs 47 mn were converted to equity shares. As a result, its interest costs have increased over
FY09-12. Total debt, however, has declined from Rs 233 mn in FY09 to Rs 204 mn in FY12.
Depreciation
Cost as a percentage of sales FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Depreciation expense (Rs mn) 8 9 9 11
Depreciation expense (% of sales) 1.9% 1.9% 1.7% 1.5%
Gross block (Rs mn) 70 95 100 116
Depreciation rate (% of average gross block) 11.7% 10.6% 9.3% 9.8%
■ The depreciation expense increased from Rs 8 mn in FY09 to Rs 11 mn in FY12 because of investments in factory building, plant and machinery, furniture
and fixtures and vehicles. Average depreciation rate declined after FY09 due to lower capex and written down value method of charging depreciation.
■ VSCL’s PBT margin has improved in line with EBITDA margin. PBT margin has expanded from 7.3% in FY09 to 11.0% in FY12.
■ The net profit for the company has increased at a four-year CAGR of 40% from Rs 25 mn in FY09 to Rs 72 mn in FY12.
Borrowings
Fixed Assets
Composition of net fixed assets
Rs mn FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Leasehold land 8 12 11 11
Factory building 14 24 23 21
Plant & machinery 30 30 28 29
Office equipment 1 1 0 0
Furniture and fixtures 2 3 4 4
Vehicles 3 4 4 11
Total assets 58 73 70 77
CWIP 10 - 6 5
■ VSCL’s assets comprise primarily of plant and machinery and factory building. The installed capacity for wires manufacturing is 14.08 lakh bundles and for
electrical accessories it is 380 lakh pieces. The company expanded its capacity for manufacturing electrical accessories from 140 lakh pieces to 380 lakh
pieces in FY11.
■ The company has purchased land for Rs 17 mn at Mahindra World City SEZ in Jaipur. The land is held in the name of its subsidiary Veto Electricals Pvt. Ltd.
■ Fixed assets are stated at actual cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost comprises the purchase price and any attributable cost of bringing the asset to
its working condition for its intended use. Depreciation on all fixed assets is provided on written down value method as per the rates and in the manner
specified in Scheduled XIV of the Companies Act, 1956.
Intangibles
Rs mn FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Goodwill 0.3 0.2 0.1 -
Trademark - - 0.001 0.005
■ Goodwill was created upon conversion of the company from a partnership firm to a private limited company in 2007. The company has completely
amortised the goodwill over FY08-12.
■ Trademarks include registered trademarks of some of the company’s key brands. These will be amortised over a period of five years.
Inventory
Veto Switchgears and Cables Ltd FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 Havells (India) Ltd FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Sales (Rs mn) 389 470 532 686 Sales (Rs mn) 23,415 25,928 31,971 40,109
Inventory (Rs mn) 124 130 142 179 Inventory (Rs mn) 2,075 3,312 4,699 6,489
Inventory days (based on sales) 116 101 97 95 Inventory days (based on sales) 32 47 54 59
■ As on March 31, 2012, the company had around 95 days of inventory (on sales basis) compared to 97 days in FY11 and 101 days in FY10. VSCL’s inventory
days are also higher than industry leader Havells’.
• Havells’ sales model involves selling to distributors, who in turn sell to retailers. In this case, distributors purchase the goods from the company and
stock it in their own warehouses. On the other hand, VSCL sells directly to retailers. Retailers usually do not have the capacity to store large amount of
inventory, and therefore VSCL has to stock inventory at its own depots and service the retailers based on demand.
■ The business was in expansion phase and the inventory days were high during FY09. With increase in sales, although inventory on absolute terms has
increased, inventory days have improved over time.
■ Stock in trade includes goods that are purchased through trading. These include fans, CFLs, wires and cables.
■ As per the management, the company does not have any work-in-process inventory as the production cycle is very short.
■ Inventory of raw materials, stock of finished goods, packing materials and stock in trade are valued at lower of cost or net realisable value. FIFO is used for
determining the historical cost.
Sundry debtors
FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Sales (Rs mn) 389 470 532 686
Debtors (Rs mn) 132 144 181 225
Debtor days 115 104 117 113
■ Sundry debtors mainly include amount receivable from dealers. It also includes loans and advances to related parties. Debtors amounted to Rs 21 mn
outstanding for more than six months as on FY12. Of this, around Rs 8 mn is currently outstanding, as per the management.
■ Receivables from related parties include a loan of Rs 17 mn given to subsidiary Veto Electricals Pvt. Ltd for purchase of land in Jaipur. Other receivables to
related parties are interest free loans given to members of the Gurnani family.
■ According to the management, the company has a policy of giving 90 days credit to its dealers. However, most dealers pay VSCL only when they sell the
goods, which is typically 100-120 days. Hence, the debtor days are over 100 days of sales. VSCL’s top customers are as follows:
■ Jai Electricals and Jaipur Electricals Ins. & Tools are promoters’ group companies. Pinkcity Build Home Pvt. Ltd is also a promoter group company but sale
to this company has not been disclosed under related party transactions (around 1% of sales in FY12).
■ The company does not provision for bad and doubtful debts. The company has a policy of taking post-dated cheques, which are collected as security
immediately from the dealers once the goods are sold by the company. VSCL also collects security deposits from its dealers in some cases. As per the
management, the company has not had any bad debts in the past and therefore has not formulated any policy regarding bad debt provisioning.
■ The company had Rs 4 mn in cash and Rs 16 mn in different bank accounts (Indian Overseas Bank, Bank of Baroda and Bank of Rajasthan) as on March 31,
2012.
Creditors
Rs mn FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Due to micro, small & medium enterprises - - - -
Due to others 40 35 37 55
Employee benefits payable 1 0 2 2
Duties and taxes payable 2 2 5 7
Trade deposits - 3 3 3
Advance from debtors 5 2 10 18
Total 48 42 56 85
■ Creditors (due to others) include creditors for capital goods, creditors for goods and creditors for expenses.
■ Advance from debtors includes advance payments received from dealers and distributors.
■ Duties and taxes payable includes outstanding liabilities towards payments of central sales tax, value added tax, tax deducted at source and contribution
to provident fund.
Provisions
Rs mn FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Provision for income tax (net of advance tax and TDS) 0 - 2 1
Provision for expenses 6 4 0 0
Interest accrued and not due 0 0 1 1
Total 7 4 2 2
Other Matters
Contingent Liabilities
Rs mn FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Guarantee given by banks on behalf of the company 0 0 5 0
Estimated amount of contracts remaining to be executed on capital account 0 0 1 1
Total 0 0 6 1
■ As per the information provided to us, there are no significant claims, pending or threatened litigations against the company in the latest available period.
■ The company has not given any significant guarantees, performance bonds, letters of comfort or similar documents of assurance and any indemnities
provided for the benefit of the company.
■ As informed by the management, all the transactions with related parties are on an arm’s length basis.
Appendix
Appendix
Appendix 1: Summary of loan agreements
Balance as at Starting
31st March Interest No. of Amount date of Re-
Lender Nature of loan Primary Security Collateral Security 2012 (Rs mn) Rate EMI of EMI payment
Indian Overseas Bank Term Loan Hypothecation of factory building, Personal guarantee 7.43 12.25% 60 0.6 3-May-08
plant & machinery of three directors
Indian Overseas Bank Term Loan Hypothecation of factory building, Personal guarantee 3.29 12.25% 60 0.10 20-Jan-11
plant & machinery of three directors
BMW Financial Services Hire Purchase Loan Hypothecation of vehicle financed Nil 3.30 11.00% 60 0.10 1-Jul-11
Private Limited
HDFC Bank Ltd Hire Purchase Loan Hypothecation of vehicle financed Nil 0.48 9.70% 60 0.00 5-Sep-10
ICICI Bank Ltd Hire Purchase Loan Hypothecation of vehicle financed Nil 2.68 2.22% 36 0.10 15-Nov-11
ICICI Bank Ltd Hire Purchase Loan Hypothecation of vehicle financed Nil 0.07 10.90% 60 0.00 10-May-08
HDFC Bank Ltd Hire Purchase Loan Hypothecation of vehicle financed Nil 0.09 9.70% 36 0.00 5-Dec-09
Indian Overseas Bank Working Capital Loan Hypothecation of stocks of raw Personal guarantee 186.51 12.00% NA NA NA
materials, work in process, of three directors
finished goods, book debts
Appendix
Appendix
The Report has been issued on the understanding that the Company's management has drawn our
attention to all matters, financial or otherwise, of which they are aware which may have an impact on
our Report upto the date of this Report. Additionally, we have no responsibility to update this Report for
events and circumstances occurring after this date.
Our work does not constitute recommendations about the completion of the operation. This Report also
does not constitute an audit in accordance with the Audit Standards and we have not independently
verified all the matters discussed in this Report and have relied on the explanations and information as
given by the management (verbal as well as written) of the Company. We have assumed the genuineness
of all signatures and the authenticity of all documents submitted to us, whether original or copies. In
this regard, management of the Company is responsible for the proper recording of transactions in the
books of account and maintaining an internal control structure sufficient to permit the preparation of
reliable financial information, including financial accounts. Consequently, we do not express an opinion
on the figures and other information included in this Report. CRISIL does take any responsibility towards
the usage of the Report in any form.
The information and conclusions of this Report should not be the basis for the listing or for any investor
to place a value on the business of the Company or to make a decision whether to acquire or invest in
the Company. Our due diligence and analysis should not be construed as investment advice; specifically,
we do not express any opinion on the suitability or otherwise of entering into any transaction in this
regard. We accept no responsibility for matters not covered by the Report or omitted due to the limited
nature of our analysis. The future plans of the Company, if any, are as informed to us by its
Management. We do not have any view on the same.
Scope of Work
The limited scope of coverage of the Company Analysis and Financial Due diligence Report would be:
i) Study of the financial statements of the Company for the financial periods ended March 31, 2010,
March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2012 (“Historical Period”).
ii) Review and comment on the reasonability and consistency of significant accounting policies
adopted
iii) Highlight significant matters in internal audit reports, audit committee reports and statutory
auditors’ management letters
iv) Analyze quality of earnings with particular focus on:
a) recurring versus non-recurring transactions (income and expenditure)
b) changes in accounting policies
c) impact of related party transactions, if any.
v) Analyze the key drivers of revenue and margin growth with particular reference to:
a) price and volume changes of key products
b) geographical expansion – export revenues vs. domestic revenues
c) key customer wins and losses during the reporting period
d) movement in prices of key raw materials and
e) changes in direct manufacturing costs
vi) Comments on the distribution network, commission, discounting arrangements and credit terms
with distributors.
vii) Analysis of selling costs, discounting policies and marketing overheads.
viii) Analysis of insurance costs including public and product liability insurances.
ix) Analysis of variances in significant administrative overheads.
x) Analysis of movement in head count and employee costs during the reporting period.
xi) Highlight key financial terms in top 5 customer contracts.
xii) Analysis of the cost sheet for the top 5 products and comment on the movements in the costs over
the Historical Period
xiii) Analysis of historical trends in replacement/maintenance capex. Based on discussion with
management, comment if there has been any deferred maintenance/replacement capex.
xiv) Analysis of the basis of capitalization and components of costs such as borrowing costs, pre-
operative expenditure, exchange fluctuations, etc.
xv) Summarize details of investments held, highlighting investments in related entities, if any.
xvi) Analysis of the trends in working capital during the reporting period.
xvii) Analysis of and comment on the ageing profile of receivables and inventories. Inquire into
provisioning policy and comment on provisions for uncollectible amounts and write-offs.
xviii) Analysis of the basis of inventory valuation and reasons for high inventory levels historically.
Emphasize on slow moving/obsolete and non-moving inventories. (physical verification of
inventories will not be conducted)
xix) Comment on other current assets, loans and advances and major creditors. Comment on
recoverability and provisioning for uncollectible amounts.
xx) Comment on the current liabilities including accounts payable and provisions/accruals.
xxi) Obtaining bank reconciliations for key accounts and comment on reconciling items.
xxii) Summarize repayment schedule for the loans outstanding as at the latest available date
The following areas (indicative list) are excluded from the scope of the Report.
Our Office
Ahmedabad Hyderabad Gurgaon
706, Venus Atlantis 3rd Floor, Uma Chambers Plot No. 46
Nr. Reliance Petrol Pump Plot No. 9&10, Nagarjuna Hills, Sector 44
Prahladnagar, (Near Punjagutta Cross Road) Opp. PF Office
Ahmedabad Hyderabad - 500 482 Gurgaon - 122 003, India
Phone : 91-79-4024 4500 Phone : 91-40-2335 8103 - 05 Phone: + 91 124 6722 000
Fax : 91-79-2755 9863 Fax : 91-40-2335 7507
Chennai
Thapar House,
43/44, Montieth Road, Egmore,
Chennai - 600 008
Phone : 91-44-2854 6205 - 06
Fax : 91-44-2854 7531
CRISIL Limited
CRISIL House, Central Avenue, Hiranandani Business Park,
Powai, Mumbai – 400076. India
Phone: + 91 22 3342 3000 Fax: + 91 22 3342 3001
Email: [email protected]
www.crisil.com