Design and Fabrication of A Magnetic Propulsion
Design and Fabrication of A Magnetic Propulsion
Design and Fabrication of A Magnetic Propulsion
I. INTRODUCTION
VER 3 million people annually in the U.S. alone suf-
O fer gastrointestinal (GI) disease serious enough to re-
quire hospitalization and 300 000 people die from GI diseases
Fig. 1. Background of capsule endoscopy (GI tract image was from [34]).
TABLE I
ACTIVE LOCOMOTION APPROACHES OF CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY
Kim et al. developed a locomotion mechanism for endoscopic Preliminary experimental results in vitro demonstrated that the
capsule using SMAs [17]. Prototype endoscopes including four device was capable of traveling in the digestive tract with a
pairs of SMA springs and clampers were fabricated, and in vitro typical speed ranging between 10 and 40 mm/min.
tests confirmed that the device was able to move in the tract Carpi et al. at the University of Pisa developed a solution us-
with a speed of 9.19 mm/min at a current of 300 mA when ing an external magnetic field applied to the endoscopic capsule,
controlling the four pieces of the moving modules sequentially. thus providing an approach of controlling capsule’s location pre-
However, considering issues of great power consumption and viously coated with a magnetic shell [24]–[26]. This technique,
high operation temperature associated with SMA-based micro- on the one hand, can interact with an imposed external magnetic
robot, state-of-the-art power-generation technology is expected field in the GI tract; on the other hand, it is readily and cheaply
to be developed for substituting the currently commercial bat- compatible with currently commercialized capsule endoscope,
tery for this specific application. and thus needs no modification of internal configuration. Re-
Mosse et al. proposed an electrical simulation method for cently, they used a commercial computer-aided surgery system
propelling an endoscope in the small intestine [18]. The loco- (Niobe, Stereotaxis, St. Louis, MO) as the controllable source
motion principle is that, by electro-stimulating circle muscle of magnetic field. They have reported the feasibility of using
contraction of the intestinal wall, the device can be propelled the technology of magnetic navigation in the field of GI en-
forwardly or backwardly. Five devices with a diameter ranging doscopy, and preliminary proof-of-concept investigations have
from 15 to 23 and with a taper of 28–40 degrees were tested in been performed [25]. However, The Stereotaxis is an advanced
the small intestine and esophagus of anesthetized pigs. When cardiology system for use in the cardiac catheterization. Thus,
stimulated at 15 Hz with 30-ms pulses at 20 mA, the device a navigation system should be designed for negotiating the spe-
moved reliably in either direction in the small intestine at a cific application of GI endoscopy. At present, to the best of our
maximum speed of 4.5 mm/s and negotiated tight curves. Elec- knowledge, few automated magnetic navigation systems have
trical stimulus approach has an unknown effect to the peristalsis been proposed and fabricated for serving the patients in the
mechanism of the intestine. Further research needs to be carried field of noninvasive GI endoscopy due to many concerns such
out for inspecting this electrophysiological problem. as safety and cost (Table I is a review of current active locomo-
Dario’s research group proposed an actuation mechanism ex- tion approaches of capsule endoscopy).
ploiting a legged microrobot to perform active exploration of Based on these motivations, we proposed an automated mul-
the digestive tract [19]–[22]. This device is equipped with four tiaxis magnetic propulsion system for specific application of
super elastic legs, allowing large stroke advancement in the GI controlling the endoscopic capsule’s location and orientation
tract, and a CMOS frontal camera to visualize the intestinal wall. in the GI tract. Magnetic-analysis model was established and
GAO et al.: DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF A MAGNETIC PROPULSION SYSTEM FOR SELF-PROPELLED CAPSULE ENDOSCOPE 2893
Fig. 5(a) shows a geometry-optimized magnet/PMMA cap- a = A0 + [An sin nω(t − t0 ) + Bn cos nω(t − t0 )],
sule prototype based on orthogonal process design. The capsule n =1
IV. MODELING
A. Magnetic Propulsion Modeling
In a current free region [37], where
∇×H=0 (2)
it is possible to define the scalar magnetic potential Vm from the
relation
H = −∇Vm (3)
where H is the magnetic-field intensity.
This is analogous to the definition of the electric potential for
static electric fields. Using the constitutive relation between the
Fig. 6. Illustration of magnetic propulsion modeling.
magnetic-flux density B and magnetic field density H
B = μ0 (H + M) (4)
The equations for the balance of forces on the capsule now
where μ0 is the permeability of vacuum, and M is the magne- become
tization vector, together with the equation
∇ · T1 + fext = 0 (12)
∇·B=0 (5)
n1 (T2 − T1 ) + gext = 0. (13)
we can derive an equation for Vm
For computing the total force F on the capsule, these equa-
−∇ · (μ0 ∇Vm − μ0 M) = 0. (6) tions need to be integrated over the entire capsule and the cap-
sule/medium boundary
Along the boundaries far away from the magnet, the magnetic
field should be tangential to the boundary as the flow lines should (∇ · T1 + fext )dV + (n1 (T2 − T1 ) + gext ) dS = 0.
form closed loops around the magnet. The natural boundary Ω1 ∂ Ω1
condition is (14)
Now, according to Gauss’ theorem
n · (μ0 ∇Vm − μ0 M) = n · B = 0 (7)
where n represents the unit normal vector. Thus, the magnetic ∇ · T1 dV − n1 T1 dS = 0. (15)
Ω1 ∂ Ω1
field is made tangential to the boundary by a Neumann condition
on the potential. This means that the external force
Cauchy’s equation of continuum mechanics reads Fext = fext dV + gext dS (16)
2 Ω1 ∂ Ω1
d r
ρ = ∇ · T + fext (8) is needed to balance the term for the boundary integral of the
dt2
where ρ is the density, r denotes the coordinates of a material stress tensor in the surrounding medium
point, T is the stress tensor, and fext is an external volume
F= n1 T2 dS (17)
force. This is the equation solved in the structural mechanics ∂ Ω1
application modes for the special case of a linear elastic material.
In the stationary case (as shown in Fig. 6), there is no accel- to keep the capsule stationary, i.e.,
eration, and the equation representing the force balance is Fext + F = 0. (18)
0 = ∇ · T + fext . (9) To summarize, the total force F is computed as a boundary
On the boundary, the following equations apply: integral of the stress tensor in the medium on the outside of the
capsule. Note that to obtain this result, the contribution from the
n1 (T̄2 − T1 ) = 0 (10) medium pressure gradient has been neglected. This is equivalent
to assuming that ∇ · T2 = 0.
n1 T̄2 = n1 T2 + gext (11)
Due to limitations of carrying out in vivo experiments, sim-
where T1 and T2 represent the stress tensor in the capsule and ulated intestinal experiments were conducted in cut-open in-
the medium around the capsule in the GI tract. The external testine specimen instead of the living body. Therefore, fluidic
boundary force gext can represent the reaction force from the medium of the intestine is approximated by air. However, in
wall of the intestine that the capsule is attached to. order to estimate the actual stress tensor of the fluidic medium
2896 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 57, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2010
TABLE II
ORTHOGONAL ARRAY OF AVERAGE FORCE UNDER FIVE FACTORS
Fig. 13. Fitting curve of the pressure (absolute pressure) of the external organs.
TABLE III
Fig. 11. Geometry model of capsule’s locomotion in the intestinal tract. SUMMARY OF COEFFICIENTS
Fig. 12. FE simulations of von Mises stress distributions allied along the
capsule moving inside the intestinal tract (in megapascals).
Fig. 15. Main effects analysis of frictional force with five factors.
Fig. 16. Interaction effects analysis of frictional force with five factors.
TABLE IV
SUMMARY OF In Vitro TESTS
[3] C. Mc Caffrey, O. Chevalerias, C. O’Mathuna, and K. Twomey, [25] F. Carpi, S. Galbiati, and A. Carpi, “Controlled navigation of endoscopic
“Swallowable-capsule technology,” IEEE Pervasive Comput., vol. 7, capsules: Concept and preliminary experimental investigations,” IEEE
no. 1, pp. 23–29, Jan./Mar. 2008. Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2028–2036, Nov. 2007.
[4] I. Kassim, W. S. Ng, G. Feng, S. J. Phee, P. Dario, and C. A. Mosse, [26] F. Carpi and C. Pappone, “Magnetic maneuvering of endoscopic capsules
“Review of locomotion techniques for robotic colonoscopy,” in Proc. 20th by means of a robotic navigation system,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.,
IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), Taipei, Taiwan, 2003, pp. 1086– vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1482–1490, May 2009.
1091. [27] J. Peirs, D. Reynaerts, and H. Van Brussel, “Design of miniature parallel
[5] B. S. Lewis and P. Swain, “Capsule endoscopy in the evaluation of pa- manipulators for integration in a self-propelling endoscope,” in Proc.
tients with suspected small intestinal bleeding: Results of a pilot study,” Eurosensors XIII Meeting, The Hague, Netherlands, 1999, pp. 409–417.
Gastrointest. Endosc., vol. 56, pp. 349–353, Sep. 2002. [28] V. R. C. Kode and M. C. Cavusoglu, “Design and characterization of
[6] M. Mylonaki, A. Fritscher-Ravens, and P. Swain, “Wireless capsule en- a novel hybrid actuator using shape memory alloy and DC micromotor
doscopy: A comparison with push enteroscopy in patients with gas- for minimally invasive surgery applications,” in Proc. 1st IEEE RAS-
troscopy and colonoscopy negative gastrointestinal bleeding,” Gut, EMBS Int. Conf. Biomed. Robot. Biomechatron. (BioRob), Pisa, Italy,
vol. 52, pp. 1122–1126, Aug. 2003. 2006, pp. 455–464.
[7] M. Y. Gao, C. Z. Hu, Z. Z. Chen, S. Liu, and H. H. Zhang, “Finite- [29] H. G. Sim, S. K. H. Yip, and C. W. S. Cheng, “Equipment and technology
difference modeling of micromachine for use in gastrointestinal en- in surgical robotics,” World J. Urol., vol. 24, pp. 128–135, Jun. 2006.
doscopy,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 2413–2419, [30] D. E. Koditschek, R. J. Full, and M. Buehler, “Mechanical aspects of
Oct. 2009. legged locomotion control,” Arthropod Struct. Dev., vol. 33, pp. 251–
[8] A. Menciassi, M. Quirini, and P. Dario, “Microrobotics for future gas- 272, Jul. 2004.
trointestinal endoscopy,” Minim. Invasive Ther. Allied Technol., vol. 16, [31] C. Pawashe, S. Floyd, and M. Sitti, “Modeling and experimental charac-
pp. 91–100, 2007. terization of an untethered magnetic micro-robot,” in Proc. 4th Robot. Sci.
[9] A. Moglia, A. Menciassi, M. O. Schurr, and P. Dario, “Wireless capsule Syst. Conf., Zurich, Switzerland, 2008, pp. 1077–1094.
endoscopy: From diagnostic devices to multipurpose robotic systems,” [32] S. Kumar, I. M. Kassim, and V. K. Asari, “Design of a vision-guided
Biomed. Microdevices, vol. 9, pp. 235–243, Apr. 2007. microrobotic colonoscopy system,” Adv. Robot., vol. 14, pp. 87–104,
[10] M. Delvaux and G. Gay, “Capsule endoscopy: Technique and indications,” 2000.
Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol., vol. 22, pp. 813–837, 2008. [33] K. B. Yesin, K. Vollmers, and B. J. Nelson, “Modeling and control of
[11] T. Nakamura and A. Teran, “Capsule endoscopy: Past, present, and future,” untethered biomicrorobots in a fluidic environment using electromagnetic
J. Gastroenterol., vol. 43, pp. 93–99, 2008. fields,” in Proc. 9th Int. Symp. Exp. Robot. (ISER), Singapore, 2004,
[12] K. Ishiyama, K. I. Arai, M. Sendoh, and A. Yamazaki, “Spiral-type micro- pp. 527–536.
machine for medical applications,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Micromechatron. [34] New world encyclopedia. (Nov. 10, 2007). [Online]. Available:
Human Sci., Nagoya, Japan, 2000, pp. 65–69. http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Gastrointestinal_tract
[13] M. Sendoh, K. Ishiyama, and K. I. Arai, “Fabrication of magnetic actuator [35] Wikipedia. (2006). [Online]. Available: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
for use in a capsule endoscope,” in Proc. Int. Magn. Conf., Boston, MA, Small_intestine
2003, pp. 3232–3234. [36] S. Park, J. Park, H. Park, S. Park, C. Jee, S. Park, and B. Kim, “Multi-
[14] A. Yamazaki, M. Sendoh, K. Ishiyama, T. Hayase, and K. I. Arai, “Three- functional capsule endoscope for gastro-intestinal tract,” presented at the
dimensional analysis of swimming properties of a spiral-type magnetic SICE-ICASE Int. Joint Conf., Busan, Korea, Oct. 2006.
micro-machine,” Sens. Actuators A—Phys., vol. 105, pp. 103–108, Jun. [37] R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands, The Feynman Lectures on
2003. Physics,. vol. 2, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1964, ch. 14.
[15] A. Chiba, M. Sendoh, K. Ishiyama, and K. I. Arai, “Moving of a magnetic [38] A. Kovetz, The Principles of Electromagnetic Theory. Cambridge, U.K.:
actuator for a capsule endoscope in the intestine of a pig,” J. Magn. Soc. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990.
Jpn., vol. 29, pp. 343–346, 2005. [39] O. Wilson, Introduction to Theory and Design of Sonar Transducers.
[16] A. Chiba, M. Sendoh, K. Ishiyama, Y. Suda, K. I. Arai, T. Komaru, Los Altos, CA: Peninsula, 1988.
and K. Shirato, “Colon endoscope navigation by magnetic actuator and [40] J. S. Kim, I. H. Sung, Y. T. Kim, D. E. Kim, and Y. H. Jang, “Analytical
intestine observations,” J. Magn. Soc. Jpn., vol. 28, pp. 433–436, model development for the prediction of the frictional resistance of a
2004. capsule endoscope inside an intestine,” in Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part
[17] B. Kim, S. Lee, J. H. Park, and J. O. Park, “Design and fabrication of a H—J. Eng. Med., Nov. 2007, vol. 221, pp. 837–845.
locomotive mechanism for capsule-type endoscopes using shape memory [41] X. Wang and M. Q. H. Meng, “An experimental study of resistant proper-
alloys (SMAs),” IEEE-ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–86, ties of the small intestine for an active capsule endoscope,” in Proc. Inst.
Feb. 2005. Mech. Eng. Part H—J. Eng. Med., 2010, vol. 224, pp. 107–118.
[18] C. A. Mosse, T. N. Mills, M. N. Appleyard, S. S. Kadirkamanathan, and [42] J. S. Kim, I. H. Sung, Y. T. Kim, E. Y. Kwon, D. E. Kim, and Y. H. Jang,
C. P. Swain, “Electrical stimulation for propelling endoscopes,” in Proc. “Experimental investigation of frictional and viscoelastic properties of
Digestive Disease Week/101st Annu. Meeting Amer. Gastroenterol. Assoc., intestine for microendoscope application,” Tribol. Lett., vol. 22, pp. 143–
San Diego, CA, 2000, pp. 79–83. 149, May 2006.
[19] L. Phee, D. Accoto, A. Menciassi, C. Stefanini, M. C. Carrozza, and [43] N. K. Baek, I. H. Sung, and D. E. Kim, “Frictional resistance characteris-
P. Dario, “Analysis and development of locomotion devices for the gas- tics of a capsule inside the intestine for microendoscope design,” in Proc.
trointestinal tract,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 613–616, Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H—J. Eng. Med., May 2004, vol. 218, pp. 193–201.
Jun. 2002.
[20] P. Dario, P. Ciarletta, A. Menciassi, and B. Kim, “Modelling and exper-
imental validation of the locomotion of endoscopic robots in the colon,”
in Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Exp. Robot. (ISER 2002), Sant Angelo, Italy,
pp. 445–453.
[21] A. Menciassi, A. Moglia, S. Gorini, G. Pernorio, C. Stefanini, and P. Dario,
“Shape memory alloy clamping devices of a capsule for monitoring tasks
in the gastrointestinal tract,” J. Micromech. Microeng., vol. 15, pp. 2045–
2055, Nov. 2005.
[22] M. Quirini, A. Menciassi, S. Scapellato, C. Stefanini, and P. Dario, “Design Mingyuan Gao (S’10) was born in Yinchuan, China,
and fabrication of a motor legged capsule for the active exploration of the in 1985. He received the M.S. degree in mechanical
gastrointestinal tract,” IEEE ASME Trans. Mechatron., vol. 13, no. 2, manufacturing and automation from Huazhong Uni-
pp. 169–179, Apr. 2008. versity of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, in
[23] K. D. Wang, G. Z. Yan, G. Y. Ma, and D. D. Ye, “An earthworm-like robotic 2010.
endoscope system for human intestine: design, analysis, and experiment,” His current research interests include biomedical
Ann. Biomed. Eng., vol. 37, pp. 210–221, Jan. 2009. equipment, biomechanical modeling, and microsys-
[24] F. Carpi, S. Galbiati, and A. Carpi, “Magnetic shells for gastrointesti- tems packaging.
nal endoscopic capsules as a means to control their motion,” Biomed. Mr. Gao received the 2009 GE Foundation TECH
Pharmacother., vol. 60, pp. 370–374, Sep. 2006. Award—first place award.
2902 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, VOL. 57, NO. 12, DECEMBER 2010
Chengzhi Hu received the B.S. degree in measur- Honghai Zhang received the Ph.D. degree in me-
ing and control technology and instrumentation and chanical manufacturing engineering from Huazhong
the M.S. degree in mechanical manufacturing and au- University of Science and Technology, Wuhan,
tomation from Huazhong University of Science and China, in 1988.
Technology, Wuhan, China, in 2008 and 2010, re- He is currently a Professor at the National Lab-
spectively. He is currently working toward the Ph.D. oratory for Optoelectronics, Huazhong University of
degree at Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan. Science and Technology. His research interests in-
His research interests include simulations and clude micro/nanomanufacturing technology. He has
analysis of electromagnetics, automation and micro- developed a number of micromanufacturing equip-
robotics, microsystems packaging technology, and ments, such as multifunctionally metrological scan-
active control of capsule endoscopy. ning probe microscopy, nanoimprinting equipment,
microjetting platform, and equipment for measurement and control of surface
microcharacteristics in precision process.