Ale Mpls Reference Design Guide En2
Ale Mpls Reference Design Guide En2
Ale Mpls Reference Design Guide En2
Guide
IP/MPLS fundamentals, reference design concepts, positioning,
and deployment guidelines for the Alcatel-Lucent Operating Software (AOS) implementation of
MPLS
Table of Contents
Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 4
Audience ..................................................................................................................................... 4
Scope ........................................................................................................................................... 4
Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 5
MPLS Fundamentals...................................................................................................................... 6
Targeted-LDP............................................................................................................................ 12
MP-BGP ..................................................................................................................................... 13
MPLS Operations...................................................................................................................... 14
Licensing ................................................................................................................................... 21
Conclusion.................................................................................................................................... 32
Audience
The intended audience for this document includes customer and business partner
networking professionals involved in the design and deployment of enterprise
networks.
Scope
This document does not attempt to cover every aspect, nor every possible
architecture option; but only the most common, validated and recommended
architectures.
This document will provide an overview of the technology and some features which
will be presented but might not be supported in the first release of IP/MPLS in AOS.
An updated version of this document may be published once such features are
available. Supported features will be presented in the Implementation section of this
document.
IP/MPLS first supported release is 8.9R3 and supported on the OmniSwitch 6860N
platform. AOS supports installation or removal of AOS MPLS package. MPLS is
packaged into a Debian package which can be installed on the switch. To configure
MPLS in AOS, it is required to install the MPLS package using Package Manager
commands, which are further detailed in the Licensing section. You are encouraged
to refer to the AOS documentation for additional details, options and guidelines , as
reference in the Related Documents section.
Introduction
Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) has been and still is the de-facto technology
used by Service Providers and enterprises to provide VPN services. MPLS is a label-
switching technology where forwarding of traffic is based on pre-determined labels
which are advertised between routers to build a label-to-label mapping. The MPLS
router forwards traffic based on a label value that is attached to IP packet headers
without looking at the inner IP packet destination details.
Benefits of MPLS
MPLS introduces many benefits to the network, including:
BGP-Free Core
Since MPLS uses labelling as a tunnel mechanism, this allows for a BGP-free core
network. This saves cost to the service provider since the core routers do not need to
support a large number of routes.
Simplicity
MPLS allows routers to perform a label lookup without examining the IP packet
details. This results in a simpler lookup process based on exact match rather than
longest match lookup as in the case of routing.
Resiliency
MPLS offers a highly-available, self-healing network and supports fast convergence
times using features such as Fast-Reroute (FRR) which provides less than 50 msec
convergence time. This makes it well-suited for mission-critical networks where
resiliency is a key factor.
Traffic Engineering
MPLS provides traffic engineering capabilities to distribute traffic load more
efficiently and optimize resource usage. Network administrators can engineer traffic
based on certain constraints using RSVP-TE protocol.
MPLS Terminology
LER
The Label Edge Router (LER) is a router that operates at the edge of the MPLS
network connecting to the Customer Edge (CE) router. It is also called Provider Edge
(PE) router in Service Provider networking terminology. It is the router responsible to
“push” or insert an MPLS label into an incoming packet to the MPLS network and
“pop” or remove an MPLS label from an incoming packet exiting the MPLS network.
There are two types of LER routers, the ingress LER (iLER), and the egress LER (eLER).
LSR
The Label Switch Router (LSR) is a router that operates within the MPLS network and
is connecting to other LSR Routers. An LER is also considered an LSR, but usually
performs the “push” and “pop” operations. An intermediate LSR is responsible to
“swap” MPLS label from incoming packets as they transit through the MPLS network
based on the LSP.
LSP
The Label Switched Path (LSP) is the transport tunnel or the pre-determined path
which is defined to switch packets from the iLER to the eLER. LSPs are unidirectional
as shown in the Figure 2 below.
FEC
Forward Equivalence Class (FEC) in MPLS terminology, which tends to correspond to
an LSP, is a set of packets with similar characteristics, such as destination IP or
Quality of Service (QoS) markings, to be assigned to an MPLS label. It is mostly used
for destination IP prefixes.
LDP
Label Distribution Protocol (LDP) is a signaling protocol used in MPLS for label
exchange and signaling to create LSP paths using the pre-determined routing
information provided by the underlying IGP.
Figure 2 - LSPs
RSVP
Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP) is a transport layer protocol used to allocat e or
reserve resources across an MPLS domain along a pre-determined LSP. RSVP-TE
which is an extension with Traffic Engineering capabilities is generally used with
MPLS to establish LSPs depending on network constraints.
MPLS Architecture and Service Framework
MPLS Label Structure
MPLS label header is 32 bits (4 bytes) and includes the following fields:
• Label: (20 bits) This is the label value which are in a range of 0-1048575 with
the first 16 values reserved for special use.
• EXP: (3 bits) These are the experimental bits used for QoS applications.
• S Bit or Bottom of Stack (BoS): (1 bit) This value is usually refers to the bottom
of the stack. If it is set to 1, then this is the bottom of the stack. Otherwise, it is
set to 0.
• Time To Live (TTL): (8 bits) This value is used for loop-prevention similar to IP
TTL value. It is decremented by 1 at each hop and the packet is discarded if it
reaches 0.
The MPLS label sits between the IP Packet and the Ethernet header as a “shim”
header. This is the reason why it is sometimes refered to as a Layer 2.5 protocol.
Reserved Labels
Labels 0-15 are reserved labels. The currently defined label values ar mentioned in
below table:
Label Purpose
0 IPv4 Explicit NULL Label
1 Router Alert Label
2 IPv6 Explicit NULL Label
3 Implicit NULL Label
14 OAM Alert Label
Table 1 - Reserved Labels
Explicit NULL and Implicit NULL labels are used in Penultimate Hop Popping (PHP)
operations which will be discussed in the Data Plane section. The Operation and
Maintenance (OAM) Alert Label differentiates OAM packets from normal user data
packets, but it is not widely implemented.
Control Plane
MPLS is tunneling protocol which relies on the underlay network to be pre-configured
with an IGP routing protocol to allow full rechability between LERs. Open Shortest
Path First (OSPF) and Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS -IS) are usually
configured in the MPLS backbone network. They are responsible to distribute the
reachability information. The best routes are stored in the Routing Table (RT) or
Routing Information Base (RIB) and then they are populated in the Forwarding
Information Base (FIB). FIB is used to forward IP packets on the Data Plane.
Transport Label allocation can be done statically or dynamically. The labels can be
dynamic allocated using a label signaling protocol such as Label Distribution Protocol
(LDP), Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP), or by using an existing protocol for
label distribution such as Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) or Segment Routing (SR).
Loopback interfaces are created at each LSR which are used for reachability between
them. Routers establish peering sessions and after which they start exchanging label
bindings for FECs. MPLS FIB comprises FTN (FEC To Next Hop label Forwarding Entry-
NHLFE) and tunnel entries for requests for a Push operation and Ingress Label
Mapping (ILM) entries for requests for a Swap/Pop operation. The FIB entries are
replicated to the Network Interfaces (NIs) in order for the hardware table to be setup
with the label entries. LSPs will then be established between LERs to allow for full
reachability. LSPs are established upstream from downstream LERs.
Furthermore, another label signaling protocol is required to advertise the Service
labels between iLER and eLER. There are two main dynamic signaling protocols for
the service labels are Targeted-LDP (T-LDP), and Multiprotocol-BGP (MP-BGP). This
can also be done statically through static label configuration. Let’s discuss each of
these protocols further.
LDP uses the reserved multicast address for “all-routers” 224.0.0.2 and uses UDP port
646 for discovery messages to establish sessions between LDP neighbors and TCP
646 for the remaining messages. LDP is automated and is used to establish both
transport tunnel LSPs and T-LDP is used to establish service tunnel LSPs. T-LDP is
covered in the next section. Each router creates a local binding of a label to each IP
prefix in its Route Table including the loopback interface. It then distributes this
binding information to all of its LDP peers. Both remote and local bindings are stored
in the ILM. A full mesh of transport tunnels is created and LSPs based on IGP best
paths. LDP associates a FEC with each LSP it creates. The FEC associated with an LSP
specifies which packets are "mapped" to that LSP.
LDP Operations
LDP should be enabled on all interfaces in the MPLS domain except towards the CE
router (in the LER router). When LDP is enabled, LSRs start sending UDP-based LDP
Hello messages on all links where it is enabled to discover any directly connected
peers. After Hello messages are exchanged and neighbors have discovered each
other, they attempt to establish an LDP session between them using TCP-based
messages. LDP message exchanges are accomplished by sending LDP protocol data
units (PDUs) over LDP session TCP connections. They negotiate LDP session
parameters by exchanging LDP Initialization messages, which contain session
parameters such as timer values, the label distribution method, and others. If they
agree, they maintain the LDP session, otherwise they wil l try to re-negotiate. After
the peer relationship is established, Hello messages and Keepalive messages are
periodically sent.
A pair of LSRs negotiates the hold-time they use for hellos from each other. Hold-
time specifies the time an LSR maintains its record of hellos from a peer on not
receiving another hello from that peer. Each proposes a hold time value, and the LSR
uses the lower of the two hold-time values. The hold-time value set on the interface
overrides the hold-time value set globally. The same also applies to Keepalive time
and Keepalive timeout.
In most cases, one LDP session is established even if multiple links exist between the
LSRs. LSRs that are running LDP have an LDP Identifier, or LDP ID. This LDP ID is a 6 -
byte field that consists of 4 bytes identifying the LSR uniquely (the loopback address)
and 2 bytes identifying the label space that the LSR is using. If the last two bytes are
0, the label space is the platform-wide or per-platform label space, which is usually
what is implemented. If they are non-zero, a per-interface label space is used.
Label Withdraw message is used to signal to an LDP peer to withdraw a FEC-label
mapping that was previously advertised. This could be because the FEC is no longer
available or was manually configured to be removed. The Label Release message is
used to respond to a Label Withdraw message or to signal to an LDP peer that it does
not need a specific FEC-label mapping that was previously requested and/or
advertised by the peer.
It is important that the LSR ID, or the loopback address is unique in the
MPLS domain to avoid any unpredictable behavior.
Label Distribution and Management
An LSR can use different modes to distribute label bindings to LDP neighbors:
• Downstream-on-Demand (DoD) Mode: Router distributes a label to a peer only
if there is a pending label request from a peer.
• Downstream Unsolicited (DU) Mode: This parameter distributes labels to peers
without waiting for a label request. This mode is typically used with the liberal
label retention mode (LLR). This is the default mode in AOS.
There are also two modes of control for label creation:
• Independent Label Distribution (ILD) Control: Each LSR might advertise label
mappings to its neighbors at any time. In independent downstream-on-
demand mode, an LSR might answer requests for label mappings immediately,
without waiting for a label mapping from the next hop. In independent
downstream unsolicited mode, an LSR might advertise a label mapping for a
FEC to its neighbors whenever it is prepared to label-switch that FEC. This is
the default mode in AOS.
• Ordered Label Distribution (OLD) Control: in this mode, an LSR may initiate the
transmission of label mapping only for an FEC for which it has a label mapping
for the FEC next hop, or for which the LSR is the egress. For each FEC for which
the LSR is not the egress and no mapping exists, the LSR must wait until a label
from a downstream LSR is received. An LSR may be an egress for some FECs
and a non-egress for others.
There is also retention modes which specifies whether a FEC is maintained or not if it
is learned from an LSR which is not the next -hop for that FEC. These retention modes
are:
• Conservative Label Retention (CLR) Mode: Maintains only the label bindings
for valid next hops in an LSP. i.e. delete all unused labels and FECs .
• Liberal Label Retention (LLR) Mode: Retain all labels binding to FEC received
from label distribution peers, even if the LSR is not the current next -hop. i.e.
retain all labels, regardless of use. This is the default mode in AOS.
LDP label distribution is propagated and flooded from the eLER upstream towards
the iLER. After LDP sessions are established and labels are distributed between LDP
peers, a full-mesh of LSPs (transport tunnels) will be created in the MPLS domain.
Targeted-LDP
Targeted-LDP (T-LDP) is used when labels are required to be exchanged between
remote LERs. In our case, it is used to establish the service labels and the service
tunnel. T-LDP is also used to improve convergence time and for traffic engineering
purposes. This is because when a link between two LSRs in an LSP fails without T -LDP,
then the LDP session is lost. However, with T-LDP, the LDP session stays up since an
alternative path may exist and negotiated labels are preserved.
T-LDP is configured between LERs to establish service tunnel LSPs and for service de-
multiplexing. T-LDP still depends on transport tunnels to establish the service
tunnels. Transport tunnels can be created using LDP, RSVP-TE, or through static
configuration.
T-LDP, as can be observed from the name “targeted”, uses unicast UDP
communication to establish the adjacency and session.
MP-BGP
MP-BGP, which is defined in RFC 2283, may be used by the Service Provider to
exchange routes of a particular Service among the LERs that are attached to that
Service. Each route within a VPN is assigned an MPLS Service Label and BGP is used
to distribute the route and the label.
The multiprotocl capabilities of BGP mainly focuses on new Network Layer Reachbility
Information (NLRI) which includes the Address Family Identifier (AFI) that identifies
the set of Network Layer protocols to which the address carried in the Next Hop field
must belong to and Next hop address to reach the NLRI IP prefixes. The
multiprotocol capabilities of BGP also enables the auto discovery of PE’s or tunnel
end point in the same service instance.
When customer traffic from a certain service instance reaches the iLER, it is
encapsulated with the Service Label, and then it is further encapsulated with the
transport label.
Data Plane
MPLS Operations
As shown in Figure 4, There are three operations for an LSR to switch packets
through a LSP: push, pop, and swap. The “push” operation is also sometimes refered
to as “imposition” and the pop operation is referred to as “disposition”. After a FEC
lookup is done, the iLER inserts or “push” a label on the received packet which is not
yet labeled and sends the packet on the data link. When an intermediate LSR receives
the labeled packet, it “swaps” or changes the top label of the stack and switches the
packet through the LSP on the data link. After the packet reaches the edge of the
network towards the eLER, all labels are “popped” or removed before the packet is
switched out of the MPLS network domain.
MPLS QoS
Using the experimental (EXP) bits in the MPLS header, preferential treatment can be
provided to different packets. Only the EXP bits of the top label (transport label) is
processed. There are two different modes for QoS: Uniform and Pipe Mode.
In uniform mode, the IP precedence value (first 3 bits of DSCP) in the IP packet is
copied to the EXP bits in the MPLS header as the packet enters the MPLS domain at
the iLER and then copied back to the IP Precedence value at the eLER as the packet
exists the domain. As the label is “swapped” in the MPLS domain, the new label EXP
value is given the same EXP value as the top label.
In pipe mode, the EXP value is set according to the Service Provider’s policy and is
independent of the customer’s QoS markings and classifications. The existing DSCP
values are unchanged.
QOS over EXP bit is not supported in the current implementation of AOS.
MPLS TTL
MPLS TTL field in the MPLS header is used for loop-prevention similar to the IP packet
TTL field. It is decremented by 1 in each hop and discarded once it reaches 0. It is
however handled differently in MPLS networks. Similar to how only the Transport
label EXP bit is processed, only the Transport label TTL is decremented as the packet
traverses the MPLS network. There are also two different modes of processing TTL
packets: Uniform and Pipe mode.
In uniform mode, the IP header TTL field is copied to the MPLS header TTL field and is
decremented normally as the packet traverses the MPLS domain.
In pipe mode, the IP header TTL field remains unchanged and the MPLS header TTL
field is handled indpendently. In case of a Layer 3 VPN, the TTL is decremented by 1
at the iLER and again at the eLER, while for Layer 2 VPN, the TTL is not changed since
only the Ethernet header is processed and not the IP packet header.
TTL manipulation is not supported for MPLS tag in the current implementation of
AOS.
An MPLS service represents a VPN, or tenant and is uniquely identified by it’s service
identifier. The service needs to be only created on LER nodes which are servicing the
locations associated to the service. There are also the following components which
exist in the LER:
• Service Access Point (SAP): A UNI-side logical port which binds a physical port
and spcific customer traffic types to a service. It is the point where the
customer traffic ingress/egress the MPLS network. Multiple SAPs can be
associated to the same physical port thus multiplexing and mapping different
customer traffic encapsulations to different SPB services.
• Service Distribution Point (SDP): An NNI-side logical port which binds a
service to a far-end router over which MPLS encapsulated packets are
distributed.
• Service Tunnel
• Transport Tunnel
There are two FECs associated with providing VPN services. One FEC for the service
tunnel, which is the service identifier, and another is or the transport tunnel, which is
the loopback interface for each LSR. Labels are stacked to provide VPN services. Th e
iLER binds the customer’s traffic from the SAP to the dedicated service and then to
the mapped service tunnel. This is done by “pushing” the Service Label to the packet.
Then another Transport label (Loopback interface) is added to the stack
corresponding to the LSP and the packet is forwarded to the next LSR. Once the
packet reaches the eLER, the top label (transport label) is “popped” and the Service
Label is processed and also “popped” and the packet is associated to the
corresponding Service and traffic is forwarded to the customer’s SAP. Intermediate
LSR are unaware of the service tunnels and labels and only process the transport
labels.
VPWS
L2VPN services can be emulated over an MPLS backbone by encapsulating Layer 2
ethernet frames and transmitting them over a PW service. Defined in RFC 8077, a
Pseudo-wire service, also called E-pipe, is used to define a virtual wire (E-LINE)
connection between two local SAPs or between two SAPs across the SPB network. The
SAP that the PW service is associated with serves as an attachment point for one end
of the point-to-point connection. With a PW point-to-point connection, there is no
forwarding decision to be made; packets simply enter one end of the connection and
leave the other end of the connection unchanged. As a result, customer MAC
addresses are not learned on the SAP attachment points. Packets are transparently
forwarded, which simplifies traffic flow and reduces hardware usage. VPWS is not
supported in the current implementation of AOS.
VPLS
VPLS is an L2VPN service that allows any-to-any (multipoint) connectivity (E-LAN). The
provider network emulates a LAN by connecting all the customer’s remote sites at
the edge of the provider network to a single bridged LAN. A full-mesh of PWs needs
to be established between LERs to form a VPLS.
In the case of VPLS, it is assumed that Ethernet is the layer 2 protocol used between
the CE and the PE. As VPLS is an Ethernet layer 2 service, the PE must be capable of
MAC learning, bridging and replication on a per-VPLS basis.
To prevent forwarding loops, the so-called “Split Horizon” rule is used. In the VPLS
context, this rule basically implies that a PE must never send a packet on a PW if that
packet has been received from a PW. This ensures that traffic cannot form a loop
over the backbone network using PWs. The fact that there is always a full mesh of
PWs between the PE devices ensures that every destination within the VPLS will be
reached by a broadcast packet.
Implementation
In this document, we will provide the configuration steps of Alcatel-Lucent Operating
System (AOS) implementation of MPLS L2VPN including:
• LDP-based VPLS
• BGP-based VPLS
We will use the following topology to provide the configuration steps for MPLS VPN
services.
Physical Topology
Licensing
MPLS is a licensed feature in AOS. MPLS is packaged into a Debian package, which
can be installed or removed independently on the switch. To configure MPLS in AOS,
it is required to install the MPLS package using Package Manager commands. Upon
installing the MPLS package, MPLS process is loaded. The LDP and BGP modules will
be loaded only after the load commands - mpls load ldp, and ip load bgp.
Also, it is required to install Site-based or Node-based license for MPLS interface to
be up and running. Two types of licenses are supported:
• Site-based license - The Site-based licenses can be used as a floating or a
shared license up to a maximum of four network nodes, without being bound
to the hardware. For licensing, a network node can be a standalone switch or a
virtual chassis of up to eight units. Site license eliminates the need to support
expiry, revocation, or transfer attributes on the switch client. All these are
handled by the site license server. Switch identification can be done using
serial numbers and system MAC addresses, and so on.
• Node-based license – The Node-based licenses are specific to any MPLS node,
not bound to the hardware, and are not tied to the Node's Serial Number, MAC
addresses, and so on. For licensing, an MPLS node can be a standalone of a
Virtual Chassis of up to eight units.
The SILOS (Site Local Licensing Server) is available as a ALE Debian software package
that runs on a switch or a virtual chassis acts as a server issuing the site or node
licenses to the sites and nodes. SWLIC (Switch Local Licensing client) runs on every
MPLS-enabled switch in the network and acts as a client getting the site or node
licenses from the SILOS.
To install the licenses, download the site or node licenses generated on the ALE
portal to the SILOS switch. To enable the site or node license in the SILOS, the
customer must use the current ALE license portal to generate the license and install it
manually using the SILOS management configuration commands. A customer may
purchase multiple site or node licenses to support more than four MPLS network
switches.
Please refer to the OmniSwitch AOS Switch Management Guide for details on how to
install the license.
Best Practices
Some best practices which you can consider for your MPLS implementation include:
• Configure IGP (OSPF/IS-IS) as an underlay in your network
• Configure a (/32) loopback interface on each switch to be used and advertise it
into your IGP
• Assign the loopback interface as the Router-ID (make sure it is unique for each
switch)
• Configure the OSPF/IS-IS network type as point-to-point between your
switches
• Use routed interfaces
• Use Bidirectional Forwarding Detection (BFD) for fast detection and
convergence
• Consider using /31 contiguous (/31) addresses for point-to-point links
This configuration is only required on the PE/LER nodes where the full-mesh
pseudowire service tunnels will be established. In our example topology, this will be
configured on R1, R6, and R7.
This configuration is only required on the PE/LER nodes where the full -mesh
pseudowire service tunnels will be established. In our example topology, this will be
configured on R1, R6, and R7.
Verification Commands
The following commands can be used to verify MPLS configuration:
# Displays the installed packages in the switch.
-> show pkgmgr [mpls]
Examples:
-> show pkgmgr
Legend: (+) indicates package is not saved across reboot
(*) indicates packages will be installed or removed after reload
Name Version Status Install Script
---------------+---------------------+------------------+---------------------------------
ams default installed default
+ mpls 1 installed /flash/working/pkg/mpls/install.sh
ams-apps default installed default
# Use this command to view Incoming label mapping (ILM) table entries.
-> show mpls ilm-table
Examples:
-> show mpls ilm-table
Legends:
ILM Code: B - BGP, L - LDP
OpCode : 1 = PUSH, 2 = POP, 3 = SWAP
ILM-ID Code FEC In-Label Out-Label Out-Intf Nexthop
------|--------|-------------|-----------|-------------|---------------|-------------
1 L 4.4.4.4 53125 3 intf3 30.30.30.2
2 L 50.50.50.0 53122 3 intf2 20.20.20.2
3 L 2.2.2.2 53121 3 intf2 20.20.20.2
# Use this command to display information about all the core VC connections for all
VPLS instances.
-> show mpls vpls-mesh
Examples:
-> show mpls vpls mesh
VPLS-ID Peer Addr Tunnel-Label In-Label Network-Intf Out-Label Protocol Status
---------+------------+--------------+----------+--------------+-----------+----------+---------
100 7.7.7.7 3 53123 intf5 52482 LDP Active
# Use this command to display all the neighbors/adjacencies for the current LSR.
-> show mpls ldp neighbor
Examples:
-> show mpls ldp neighbor
IP Address Negotiated Holdtime LDP ID Interface Name Mode
-------------+---------------------+-----------+------------------+------------
10.10.10.1 15 5.5.5.5:0 intf1 Targeted
# Use this command to display sessions established between this LSR and other LSRs.
-> show mpls ldp session [ip-address]
Examples:
-> show mpls ldp session
Peer Address Interface Name TCP State Session State Keepalive
------------+-------------------+-----------------+------------------+------------
5.5.5.5 intf1 Established OPERATIONAL 30
# Displays debug information for the virtual ports associated with the service
-> show service {<service_id> | vpls <vpls_id>} debug-info
Examples:
-> show service vpls 100 debug-info
Legend: * denotes a dynamic object
VPLS Service 1 Debug Info
Admin : Up, Oper : Down, Stats : N,
VPLSID : 100, RemoveIngTag : N,
VFI : 1, McIdx : 3, StatsHandle : 0
# Displays the virtual ports associated with the specified VPLS service
-> show service {<service_id> | vpls <vpls_id>} ports
Examples:
-> show service vpls 100 ports
Legend: * denotes a dynamic object
VPLS Service 1 Debug Info
Admin : Up, Oper : Up, Stats : N,
VPLSID : 100, RemoveIngTag : N,
Sap Trusted:Priority/ Sap Description /
Identifier Adm Oper Stats Sdp FarEnd/Group Intf Sdp Intf Name
----------------+----+----+-----+--------------------+--------+--------------------
sap:1/1/11:10 Up Up N Y:x 1/1/11 -
Total Ports: 1
# Displays SDP bindings with the specified SDP ID and/or service ID number.
-> show service vpls <vplsId> mesh-sdp {<num> |<num:num>}
Examples:
-> show service vpls 100 mesh-sdp 5
Mesh-SDP Detailed Info
MeshSDP Id : 5:1, Remote SysName : ,
RemoveIngTag : No, Remote SystemId : 0000.0000.0000,
VPLSID : 100, Interface : ***ifIdx=0***,
Admin Status : Up, Oper Status : Down,
Stats Status : Yes, Allocation Type : Static,
SdpType : , SP_SourceId : 0x0,
L2 McIndex : 0, EgressPortList : ,
Ingress Pkts : 0, Ingress Bytes : 0,
Egress Pkts : 0, Egress Bytes : 0,
Mgmt Change : 02/04/2008 19:54:22, Status Change : 02/04/2008 19:54:22
# Displays the SDP configuration for VPLS services.
-> show service sdp [<sdp_id>] | [vpls]
Examples:
-> show service sdp vpls
Legend: * denotes a dynamic object
VPLS SDP Info
SdpId FarEnd/Group Addr Adm Oper Intf Bind Count Protocol Associated LSP IDs
-----+-----------------+----+----+-----+----------+--------+--------------------
10 1.1.1.1 Up Up - 1 LDP 2,
Total SDPs: 1
Total Bind-SDPs: 1
Total Bind-SDPs: 1
Total Bind-SDPs: 1
Total Bind-SDPs: 1
# This command will display in the last two highlighted fields whether L2VPN VPLS
is activated for the neighbor and whether L2VPN VPLS capability is enabled or
disabled between the peers
-> show ip bgp neighbors [ip_address]
Examples:
-> show ip bgp neighbors 120.120.0.2
# Displays the configured vpls info and number of mesh peers established.
-> show ip bgp l2vpn-vpls
Examples:
VPLS-ID VE-ID Route-Target Route-Distinguisher Discovered-Peers
----------+----------+---------------+---------------------+----------------
50 51 65724:50 65724:50 1
# Displays the local and remote VPLS attributes info.
-> show ip bgp l2vpn-vpls path [VPLS-ID]
Examples:
The following commands can be used to verify the source learning MAC address table
information for the switch:
# Displays Source Learning MAC Address Table information for the switch.
-> show mac-learning
Examples:
Conclusion
MPLS is a mature and proven technology and remains crucial for service providers
and enterprise mission-critical networks. This is due to its fast-covergence, traffic
engineering capabilities, and its ability to provide multiple services (Layer 2 or Layer
3) over a single unified infrastructure. It’s complexity is proportional to it’s
performance. ALE IP/MPLS implementation along with it’s service-defined networking
allows for achieving an autonomous multi-technology fabric network.
Related Documents
[1] RFC 3031 – MPLS Architecture - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3031/
[2] RFC 3036 – LDP Specification - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3036/
[3] RFC 5036 – LDP Specification - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5036/
[4] RFC 2283 – Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2283
[5] RFC 4761 - Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using BGP for Auto-Discovery and
Signaling - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4761/
[6] RFC 4762 - Virtual Private LAN Service (VPLS) Using Label Distribution Protocol
(LDP) Signaling - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4762/
[7] RFC 3478 - Graceful Restart Mechanism for Label Distribution Protocol -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3478/
[8] OmniSwitch AOS Network Configuration Guide
[9] OmniSwitch AOS Advanced Routing Guide