Role of Media

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

ROLE OF MEDIA

Indian media coverage of the November 2008 Mumbai terror attacks has sparked a
discussion about how much media regulation is necessary for both public safety and
the general welfare. Since the media is a two-edged tool, it must be handled carefully
and sensibly. The media was enthralled with the idea of delivering images and
information in "real-time" as they competed for TRP during the 26/11 attacks.
Another negative aspect of media that frequently does more harm than good is
exaggeration. The terrorists and their handlers in Pakistan were receiving more
assistance than anyone else from the media, because of nonstop coverage of the events
at the Taj, Oberoi, Chabad House, and other locations.
While some media channels were covering these events in good faith and in order to
keep the nation informed, some media houses, may be deliberately covering these to
help the terrorists
Press freedom has been questioned frequently and in a variety of ways. Without a
doubt, national security, social, political, and economic issues are just as crucial as the
freedom of the fourth estate. Both sides are affected by the issue. By revealing
corruption at various levels of the system and so raising the state's accountability, the
press has performed enormous benefits to the country through its investigative
journalism. However, there has been a lot of instances in which the media has
straddled the fine line between presenting the facts and offering opinions on issues of
strategic and national importance, creating crisis situations. The most important reason
is that, the media, too, has become a victim of the 'tyranny of the market.' In their
struggle for survival in the market and enhancing television rating points (TRP),
which is essential for attracting advertisements and maximizing revenue and profits,
the television channels have lost out on the ethics of journalism.
Terrorist incidents are profitable for both the media and the terrorists. Terrorists
benefit from free publicity for their cause and for themselves. Meanwhile, as
newspaper sales rise in response to reports of terror attacks, the media profits.
International, national, and local media outlets have made some attempts to develop
reasonable protocols for reporting on terrorist incidents. While the media must be able
to continue serving as a counterbalance, it is equally vital that they be able to play a
positive role in times of local or national crisis. One of the best instances
demonstrating the critical need for responsible media was the Mumbai incident.

The primary goal of the terrorist attack in Mumbai was to instill fear in the public and
damage India's reputation abroad, which would have an adverse effect on the nation's
rapidly expanding economy and tourism. In the name of providing comprehensive
coverage, the media openly publicized the demands of terrorists and instilled fear in
the public, thereby satisfying their needs and motivating them to carry out more acts
of terrorism. The majority of the stories published in newspapers are negative ones
that sensationalize the problem, instill fear and insecurity in readers.
In summary, the "real-time" reporting by all TV networks was immature and
essentially pointless. Furthermore, he would have become a "Martyr" for all of them if
a member of the media had died. Both Indian viewers and Pakistani "handlers" were
receiving real-time reporting, and these reports were regularly being used to provide
direction and advice.

You might also like