766-Article Text-2226-1-10-20240208

International Medical Science Research Journal, Volume 4, Issue 2, February 2024
OPEN ACCESS
International Medical Science Research Journal
P-ISSN: 2707-3394, E-ISSN: 2707-3408
Volume 4, Issue 2, P.No.141-157, February 2024
DOI: 10.51594/imsrj.v4i2.766
Fair East Publishers
Journal Homepage: www.fepbl.com/index.php/imsrj
MENTAL HEALTH POLICIES: A COMPARATIVE REVIEW

BETWEEN THE USA AND AFRICAN NATIONS
Ifeoma Pamela Odilibe1, Opeoluwa Akomolafe2, Jeremiah Olawumi Arowoogun3,
Evangel Chinyere Anyanwu4, Chinyere Onwumere5, & Jane Osareme Ogugua6
1
Independent Researcher, Houston, Texas, U.S.A
2
Health Connect Services Walsall, UK
3
Bharat Serums and Vaccines Limited, Lagos, Nigeria
4
Independent Researcher, Nebraska, USA
5
Abia State University Teaching Hospital, Aba, Nigeria
6
Independent Researcher, Abuja, Nigeria
___________________________________________________________________________
Corresponding Author: Ifeoma Pamela Odilibe
Corresponding Author Email: [email protected]
Article Received: 01-01-24 Accepted:27-01-24 Published: 08-02-24
Licensing Details: Author retains the right of this article. The article is distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 License
(http://www.creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial use,
reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is
attributed as specified on the Journal open access page.
___________________________________________________________________________
ABSTRACT
This comparative review examines mental health policies in the United States and various
African nations, shedding light on the divergent approaches taken to address the complex
challenges posed by mental health disorders. The analysis underscores the contextual nuances
that shape mental health policy formulation and implementation in these distinct regions. In the
United States, a comprehensive mental health policy framework has evolved over the years,
characterized by a combination of federal and state initiatives. The Mental Health Parity and
Addiction Equity Act, alongside the Affordable Care Act, has sought to integrate mental health
services into mainstream healthcare, promoting accessibility and reducing stigma. Additionally,
the National Institute of Mental Health plays a pivotal role in advancing research and evidence-
based interventions. Contrastingly, African nations exhibit a wide spectrum of mental health
policy landscapes, reflecting the diverse socioeconomic and cultural contexts across the
Odilibe, Akomolafe, Arowoogun, Anyanwu, Onwumere, & Ogugua, P.No. 141-157 Page 141
continent. Some countries have made significant strides in policy development, emphasizing
community-based approaches and integration with primary healthcare systems. However,
challenges persist, including limited resources, mental health workforce shortages, and stigma
associated with mental health conditions. The review explores the role of cultural factors in
shaping mental health policies, emphasizing the need for culturally sensitive approaches in
African nations. It also highlights the disparities in resource allocation and mental health
infrastructure between the USA and African countries, contributing to variations in service
accessibility and quality of care. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance of ongoing
efforts to destigmatize mental health issues, improve public awareness, and strengthen
community support systems. The review concludes by calling for increased international
collaboration, knowledge exchange, and resource mobilization to address the mental health
disparities between the USA and African nations, fostering a global commitment to holistic
mental healthcare.
Keywords: Health, Policies, Mental, Care, Stigmatize.
___________________________________________________________________________
INTRODUCTION
Mental health policies play a pivotal role in shaping the well-being of individuals and
communities, influencing the accessibility, quality, and inclusivity of mental health services
(Arakelyan and Ager, 2021). Recognizing the critical significance of mental health in overall
public health, this comparative review delves into the intricate frameworks governing mental
health policies, drawing a parallel between the United States and various African nations
(Sheather et al., 2023). The exploration of these distinct regions aims to unravel the contextual
intricacies that mold mental health policy formulation and implementation, shedding light on
disparities, challenges, and opportunities for improvement.
Mental health, long marginalized and stigmatized, has emerged as a central component of global
health agendas (Patterson et al., 2020). The recognition of mental health as an integral facet of
overall well-being has prompted nations to develop comprehensive policies that address the
multifaceted challenges associated with mental health disorders (Kalariya et al., 2023). These
policies encompass a spectrum of interventions, from destigmatizing mental health conditions
to integrating mental health services into mainstream healthcare frameworks (Montesanti et al.,
2022). The growing acknowledgment of the interconnectedness between mental and physical
health underscores the urgency of robust mental health policies to foster resilient, equitable, and
accessible mental healthcare systems (Pearson et al., 2023).
The rationale for comparing mental health policies between the United States and African
nations stems from the diversity of their respective sociocultural, economic, and healthcare
landscapes. The United States, characterized by a developed healthcare infrastructure, faces its
unique challenges in mental health policy implementation (Hoagwood et al., 2020). On the
other hand, African nations exhibit a wide range of healthcare systems, each grappling with
distinct sociocultural factors that shape mental health policies (Bemme and Kirmayer, 2020).
This comparative approach aims to unravel the variations and commonalities in policy
responses, allowing for a nuanced understanding of the successes and challenges encountered
in disparate contexts.
The primary objectives of this comparative review are twofold. Firstly, it seeks to provide an
in-depth analysis of mental health policies in the United States, unraveling the historical
development, key legislative frameworks, and the impact of federal and state-level initiatives.
Secondly, the review endeavors to offer a comprehensive examination of mental health policies
across diverse African nations, taking into account the variability in policy landscapes,
challenges faced, and innovative approaches adopted. By achieving these objectives, the review
aims to contribute to a broader understanding of the global mental health landscape, fostering
informed discussions and guiding future policy directions for improved mental health
outcomes.
Mental Health Policies in the United States
The evolution of mental health policies in the United States reflects a complex journey marked
by shifts in societal attitudes, legislative initiatives, and advancements in healthcare practices
(Puras, 2022). Historically, mental health was often marginalized, with individuals
experiencing mental illnesses subjected to institutionalization and social stigma. It was not until
the mid-20th century that a paradigm shift occurred, leading to the development of policies that
aimed to address mental health more comprehensively.
The mid-20th century witnessed the deinstitutionalization movement, driven by concerns about
the inhumane conditions in psychiatric institutions (Series, 2022). This movement advocated
for the transition from institutional care to community-based mental health services. The
Community Mental Health Centers Act of 1963 was a landmark piece of legislation that
supported the establishment of community mental health centers, fostering a more decentralized
and humane approach to mental health care (Bell et al., 2020). The latter part of the 20th century
saw increased advocacy for mental health parity, emphasizing the need to treat mental health
on par with physical health. This advocacy laid the groundwork for future policies that aimed
to eliminate discriminatory practices and ensure equitable access to mental health services.
Enacted in 2008, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act marked a significant
milestone in mental health policy. MHPAEA aimed to eliminate disparities in insurance
coverage between mental health and substance use disorder services and medical-surgical
services (Anim et al., 2022). The act mandated that insurance plans offering mental health and
substance use disorder benefits must do so on terms comparable to medical-surgical benefits.
This legislation represented a crucial step in dismantling barriers to mental health care and
reducing stigma by recognizing mental health as an integral component of overall healthcare.
The Affordable Care Act, signed into law in 2010, had profound implications for mental health
policy in the United States (Campbell and Shore-Sheppard, 2020). ACA expanded Medicaid,
increasing access to mental health services for low-income individuals. It also included essential
health benefits, mandating coverage for mental health and substance use disorder services in
individual and small group health plans. ACA's emphasis on preventive services and integration
of mental health into overall healthcare signaled a transformative approach, acknowledging the
interconnectedness of mental and physical well-being (Meisnere et al., 2023).
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) plays a central role in advancing mental health
research, treatment, and policy development in the United States. Established in 1946, NIMH
is part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and has been instrumental in shaping the
nation's mental health agenda (Sirey et al., 2023). NIMH conducts groundbreaking research to
enhance the understanding of mental illnesses, their causes, and effective treatments. The
institute supports a diverse range of research initiatives, from basic neuroscience studies to
clinical trials exploring novel interventions. NIMH's research informs evidence-based practices,
contributing to the development of effective mental health policies.
NIMH serves as a bridge between scientific research and policy development. The institute's
findings influence the formulation of mental health policies by providing policymakers with the
latest evidence on mental health interventions, prevention strategies, and the impact of mental
illnesses on society. NIMH's role in translating research into policy ensures that mental health
policies are informed by the most current and robust scientific knowledge (Pringle et al., 2021).
The integration of mental health services into mainstream healthcare has been a focal point of
recent mental health policies in the United States. Recognizing that mental health is inseparable
from overall well-being, efforts have been made to break down silos between mental and
physical healthcare and ensure that mental health services are integrated into the broader
healthcare system. Collaborative care models represent a paradigm shift towards integrating
mental health services into primary care settings (Menear et al., 2020). In these models, mental
health professionals work collaboratively with primary care providers to deliver comprehensive
and coordinated care. This approach aims to identify and address mental health issues early,
reducing the burden on specialized mental health facilities and ensuring that individuals receive
holistic care.
The integration of telehealth and technology has played a pivotal role in improving access to
mental health services. Telehealth platforms allow individuals to receive mental health support
remotely, overcoming geographical barriers and increasing the reach of services. Technology
integration also includes the use of mobile applications for mental health monitoring, virtual
therapy sessions, and online resources to enhance mental health awareness (Connolly et al.,
2021). Mental health policies increasingly emphasize preventive measures to address mental
health issues before they escalate. Integrating mental health education into schools, workplaces,
and community settings promotes early intervention and destigmatization. Preventive measures
contribute to a shift in societal attitudes towards mental health, fostering an environment that
supports mental well-being from a young age (Fusar‐Poli et al., 2021).
In conclusion, mental health policies in the United States have undergone significant evolution,
transitioning from a history of institutionalization to a contemporary approach that emphasizes
parity, integration, and prevention. The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the
Affordable Care Act have been pivotal in reshaping the landscape of mental health care,
breaking down barriers to access and promoting a more holistic understanding of health
(Duncan et al., 2023). The National Institute of Mental Health continues to be at the forefront
of research and policy translation, ensuring that mental health policies are evidence-based and
responsive to the evolving needs of individuals and communities across the nation. The
integration of mental health services into mainstream healthcare represents a transformative
shift, acknowledging that mental health is an integral aspect of overall well-being (McGorry et
al., 2022).
Mental Health Policies in African Nations
The mental health policy landscapes across African nations are marked by a rich tapestry of
diversity shaped by unique cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare contexts (Osío, 2023). The
variations in policy approaches are influenced by factors such as historical legacies, cultural
beliefs, governance structures, and the availability of resources. While there is a growing
recognition of the importance of mental health across the continent, the diversity in mental
health policies reflects the multifaceted nature of addressing mental health challenges in such a
heterogeneous region.
The cultural diversity within Africa contributes to the heterogeneity of mental health policies.
Cultural beliefs, traditional healing practices, and societal attitudes toward mental health play a
significant role in shaping policies. Some countries integrate traditional healing methods into
mental health frameworks, recognizing the importance of cultural competence in delivering
effective care (Im et al., 2021). Others may adopt a more biomedical approach, aligning policies
with Western models of mental health care. The governance structures of individual African
nations also influence mental health policies. Federal and decentralized governance models
impact the distribution of resources, the formulation of policies, and the implementation of
mental health programs. Countries with robust governance structures may have more
coordinated and effective mental health policies, while those facing governance challenges may
encounter difficulties in policy implementation (Paniagua and Rayamajhee, 2022).
Economic variations among African nations contribute to disparities in mental health policies.
Wealthier countries may have more resources to allocate to mental health programs, leading to
the development of comprehensive policies and well-equipped mental health facilities.
Conversely, countries with limited economic resources may struggle to establish and implement
effective mental health policies, leading to disparities in service availability and accessibility.
Recognizing the importance of community engagement and the interconnectedness of mental
and physical health, several African nations are adopting community-based approaches and
integrating mental health services into primary healthcare systems (Corbin et al., 2021). These
strategies aim to enhance accessibility, reduce stigma, and ensure that mental health is
integrated into broader healthcare agendas.
Many African nations leverage community-based approaches to address mental health
challenges. These approaches involve collaboration with local communities, traditional healers,
religious leaders, and community health workers. By incorporating culturally sensitive
interventions and utilizing existing community structures, mental health policies strive to bridge
gaps in awareness, reduce stigma, and provide support within the cultural context (Codjoe et
al., 2021).
Integrating mental health services into primary healthcare is a key strategy to enhance
accessibility. By embedding mental health care within general health services, individuals are
more likely to seek help early, reducing the burden on specialized mental health facilities
(Puffer and Ayuku, 2022). This integration fosters a holistic approach to healthcare,
acknowledging the interplay between mental and physical well-being. Collaborative care
models, where mental health professionals work alongside primary care providers, have gained
traction. This approach ensures that mental health is not treated in isolation but is an integral
part of overall health management. Integration with primary healthcare also addresses the
shortage of specialized mental health facilities, especially in rural areas.
One of the primary challenges faced by many African nations in mental health policy
development is the constraint of limited resources (Troup et al., 2021). Insufficient funding and
budgetary allocations for mental health programs hinder the establishment of robust
infrastructure, the procurement of essential medications, and the implementation of community-
based initiatives. The scarcity of financial resources poses a barrier to the comprehensive
expansion of mental health services, leading to disparities in service availability (Coombs et al.,
2021). African nations often grapple with shortages in the mental health workforce. The scarcity
of trained professionals, including psychiatrists, psychologists, and psychiatric nurses, impedes
the effective implementation of mental health policies. Addressing workforce shortages
requires strategic investments in education, training, and retention programs to build a
sustainable mental health workforce that can cater to the diverse needs of the population
(Alegría et al., 2021).
Stigma surrounding mental health conditions remains a pervasive challenge in many African
societies. Deep-rooted cultural beliefs, misconceptions, and traditional attitudes contribute to
the stigmatization of individuals with mental illnesses. The fear of social exclusion and
discrimination hampers efforts to destigmatize mental health and discourages individuals from
seeking help. Mental health policies need to incorporate targeted awareness campaigns,
education, and community engagement to challenge and change societal attitudes toward
mental health (Walsh and Foster, 2021). Stigma also affects policy development, as
policymakers may be hesitant to prioritize mental health due to prevailing negative attitudes.
Overcoming stigma requires a multi-faceted approach involving not only policy changes but
also societal transformations through education and community involvement.
In conclusion, the diversity of mental health policies in African nations reflects the complex
interplay of cultural, economic, and governance factors. While community-based approaches
and integration with primary healthcare demonstrate promising strides, challenges such as
limited resources, workforce shortages, and stigma persist (Nadkarni et al., 2023). Addressing
these challenges requires sustained efforts, collaborative partnerships, and a commitment to
mental health as an integral component of overall well-being. As African nations navigate the
complexities of mental health policy development, the recognition of cultural nuances and the
promotion of inclusive, accessible, and culturally competent mental health care remain
paramount.
Cultural Factors Shaping Mental Health Policies
Mental health policies are not only influenced by clinical and scientific considerations but are
also deeply rooted in cultural contexts that shape societal perceptions, attitudes, and responses
to mental health challenges (Kirkbride et al., 2024). This comparative review explores the
influence of cultural factors on mental health policy formulation in the United States and various
African nations. It delves into the importance of culturally sensitive approaches, highlighting
efforts to address cultural stigma in both regions.
In the United States, mental health policies are shaped by a dynamic cultural landscape marked
by diversity in beliefs, values, and practices (Kyere and Fukui, 2023). Cultural attitudes towards
mental health have undergone significant shifts over time, evolving from a historical backdrop
of stigmatization and institutionalization to a contemporary emphasis on destigmatization and
community-based care as explain in figure 1.
Figure 1: This framework can be used or adapted to address rural mental health disparities (Morales et al., 2020)
The influence of cultural contexts is evident in policy initiatives that seek to ensure equitable
access to mental health services for diverse populations.
Policies in the U.S. are designed to respect individual autonomy and accommodate a range of
cultural perspectives. For instance, the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act and the
Affordable Care Act emphasize the integration of mental health services into mainstream
healthcare, recognizing that mental health is inseparable from overall well-being (Agarwal et
al., 2022). This integration reflects an acknowledgment of the interconnectedness of mental and
physical health, aligning with cultural values that prioritize holistic approaches to healthcare.
The cultural diversity within African nations contributes to a nuanced approach to mental health
policy formulation. Mental health policies in African countries are often influenced by
traditional healing practices, communal support structures, and cultural norms that shape how
mental health is perceived within different communities. Recognizing this diversity, some
African nations adopt community-based approaches that leverage cultural resources and
involve traditional healers in mental health interventions (Okunade et al., 2023).
Cultural contexts also play a role in the integration of mental health into primary healthcare
systems. In many African societies, community-based care aligns with cultural values of
communal support and interconnectedness. Mental health policies that consider these cultural
nuances are more likely to be accepted and embraced by the communities they aim to serve.
Culturally sensitive approaches in African nations involve respecting and incorporating
traditional healing practices. Traditional healers, often deeply embedded in the fabric of local
cultures, can play a vital role in mental health care (Bemme and Kirmayer, 2020). Policies that
recognize and collaborate with traditional healers foster a more inclusive and culturally
competent mental health system.
Effective mental health policies in African nations engage local communities and tailor
interventions to be culturally relevant. Culturally sensitive policies recognize the importance of
community structures, religious beliefs, and social norms in shaping mental health perceptions.
Involving community leaders, religious figures, and local influencers in mental health initiatives
enhances the acceptability and effectiveness of these programs.
Cultural sensitivity extends to language use and communication strategies. Mental health
policies that employ culturally appropriate language, considering linguistic diversity within
African nations, facilitate better communication and understanding (Kamau et al., 2022). Clear
communication helps in destigmatizing mental health issues and encourages individuals to seek
help without fear of cultural insensitivity.
Despite progress, cultural stigma surrounding mental health persists in the United States.
Cultural factors, including cultural norms of self-reliance and individualism, can contribute to
reluctance in seeking mental health support. Mental health policies in the U.S. strive to address
stigma through public awareness campaigns, anti-discrimination efforts, and initiatives that
encourage open conversations about mental health. Cultural sensitivity is embedded in
programs that recognize the unique experiences of diverse populations, including ethnic and
minority groups (Remaker et al., 2021). Tailored interventions for specific cultural
communities’ help dismantle cultural barriers to mental health care, fostering a more inclusive
and accessible mental health system.
Cultural stigma around mental health is a significant challenge in many African nations, where
traditional beliefs and misconceptions may contribute to negative attitudes (Mascayano et al.,
2020). Policies aimed at addressing cultural stigma involve educational campaigns that
challenge stereotypes, dispel myths, and promote understanding of mental health conditions. In
some instances, cultural influencers, such as religious leaders, are involved in destigmatization
efforts to leverage their influence within communities. Moreover, mental health policies in
African nations prioritize the training of healthcare professionals to deliver culturally competent
care (Essien and Asamoah, 2020). This involves understanding the cultural contexts of
individuals seeking help and adapting interventions accordingly. The goal is to create an
environment where individuals feel comfortable seeking mental health support without fear of
judgment or discrimination.
In conclusion, the influence of cultural factors on mental health policies is a critical aspect of
shaping responsive and effective mental healthcare systems. Both the United States and African
nations grapple with the challenge of cultural stigma, but efforts to adopt culturally sensitive
approaches are evident. Recognizing the importance of cultural contexts, tailoring
interventions, and engaging communities are integral to building mental health policies that
resonate with the diverse beliefs and values of the populations they serve (Sim et al., 2023).
The ongoing journey towards destigmatization and accessibility in mental health care requires
continual collaboration, cultural humility, and a commitment to understanding the unique
perspectives of individuals and communities.
Disparities in Resources and Infrastructure
Mental health policies are intrinsically linked to the availability of resources and the robustness
of healthcare infrastructure within a given region (Delmelle et al., 2022). This comparative
review delves into the disparities in resources and infrastructure between the United States and
African nations, examining how variations in resource allocation impact mental health policies
and subsequently influence the accessibility and quality of mental health services. The United
States, with its advanced healthcare system, has made significant strides in resource allocation
for mental health (Alowais et al., 2023). However, despite progress, challenges persist,
reflecting a complex interplay of federal and state-level funding, insurance coverage, and
societal attitudes.
The federal government in the United States allocates funding for mental health through various
initiatives. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA),
operating under the Department of Health and Human Services, plays a pivotal role in
distributing grants to states, communities, and organizations (Alegría et al., 2021). Federal
funding supports a range of mental health programs, from prevention and early intervention to
treatment and recovery services. While federal funding provides a framework, mental health
resource allocation also varies at the state level. States maintain considerable autonomy in
determining mental health budgets, resulting in disparities in funding across different regions.
States with higher financial capacities may allocate more resources to mental health services,
leading to discrepancies in the availability of programs and support.
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has played a transformative role in expanding mental health
coverage in the United States (Mazurek et al., 2022). The inclusion of mental health and
substance use disorder services as essential health benefits ensures that insurance plans must
cover these services. However, variations in insurance coverage persist, impacting the
accessibility of mental health services for individuals with different insurance plans or those
without coverage.
The disparities in mental health infrastructure between the United States and African nations
are multifaceted, encompassing factors such as facilities, workforce, and technology. In the
United States, mental health infrastructure includes a network of psychiatric hospitals,
community mental health centers, and outpatient facilities. While urban areas often boast well-
equipped facilities, rural regions may face challenges in terms of accessibility. The existence of
a comprehensive network of mental health treatment centers reflects the higher level of
infrastructure development in the USA (Grum and Kobal Grum, 2020). In contrast, many
African nations encounter limitations in mental health infrastructure. The availability of
psychiatric hospitals and treatment centers varies widely, with some regions lacking sufficient
facilities. Rural areas, in particular, face significant gaps in mental health infrastructure, making
it challenging for individuals in these areas to access specialized care.
Workforce shortages are a common challenge in mental health infrastructure globally, including
both the USA and African nations. The United States, while having a more extensive mental
health workforce compared to many African countries, still experiences shortages, particularly
in certain geographical areas or specific specialties (Mongelli et al., 2020). African nations often
grapple with severe shortages in mental health professionals, including psychiatrists,
psychologists, and psychiatric nurses. The limited availability of trained professionals hinders
the establishment of a robust mental health workforce and contributes to disparities in service
delivery (Essien and Asamoah, 2020). The integration of technology, including telehealth
solutions, is more pronounced in the mental health infrastructure of the United States.
Telehealth services provide opportunities for remote consultations, increasing accessibility, and
addressing geographical barriers. The availability of technology in mental health services
contributes to the overall efficiency of the system in the USA.
In contrast, some African nations face challenges in adopting widespread telehealth solutions
due to technological infrastructure limitations. Unequal access to technology, limited internet
connectivity, and disparities in digital literacy contribute to variations in the utilization of
telehealth in mental health services (Song et al., 2021).
The relatively higher resource allocation and well-established mental health infrastructure in
the USA contribute to improved accessibility compared to many African nations. Urban areas
typically have a more comprehensive range of mental health services, including specialized care
and community-based support (Stroul et al., 2021). However, rural areas may experience
challenges due to workforce shortages and limited facilities, impacting the accessibility of
mental health services.
Insurance coverage also influences accessibility, with individuals covered by comprehensive
plans having better access to a broader spectrum of mental health services. Despite
advancements, disparities persist, affecting marginalized populations and those with limited
financial means.
Limited resources and infrastructure challenges in many African nations hinder the accessibility
of mental health services. Rural communities often face significant barriers due to the scarcity
of mental health facilities and a shortage of trained professionals. Geographic distance, coupled
with limited transportation options, exacerbates disparities, making it difficult for individuals
in remote areas to access timely and quality mental health care.
Additionally, cultural factors may influence help-seeking behaviors, further impacting
accessibility. Stigma, misconceptions, and traditional beliefs can deter individuals from seeking
mental health support, irrespective of the available infrastructure (Koschorke et al., 2021). The
quality of mental health services is influenced by resource allocation, workforce capacity, and
the overall infrastructure. In the USA, the availability of well-equipped facilities, a qualified
workforce, and technological advancements contribute to a higher standard of mental health
care (Dopheide et al., 2022). Evidence-based practices, research initiatives, and continuous
professional development programs contribute to the quality of services.
In African nations, challenges in resource allocation and infrastructure impact the quality of
mental health services. Limited access to specialized care, workforce shortages, and gaps in
training programs may contribute to variations in the quality of mental health care. Efforts to
enhance the quality of services often involve training programs, knowledge exchange
initiatives, and collaborations with international partners (Kasprowicz et al., 2020).
In conclusion, the disparities in resources and infrastructure between the USA and African
nations significantly impact the accessibility and quality of mental health services. While the
USA benefits from higher resource allocation, a more extensive mental health infrastructure,
and advanced technology, many African nations face challenges related to limited resources,
workforce shortages, and gaps in technological infrastructure. Recognizing these disparities is
crucial for the development of targeted interventions, capacity-building efforts, and
collaborative initiatives aimed at bridging the gap and ensuring equitable access to mental
health services globally (Pringle et al., 2021).
Challenges and Opportunities
Both the United States and African nations grapple with the pervasive challenge of stigma
surrounding mental health. Cultural norms, misconceptions, and historical attitudes contribute
to the reluctance of individuals to seek mental health support. Overcoming deeply ingrained
stigmas remains a shared challenge that requires targeted efforts to raise awareness and foster
cultural acceptance of mental health conditions (Sweeting and Haupt, 2024).
Limited resources pose a significant hurdle to effective mental health policy implementation in
both the USA and African nations. Insufficient funding, workforce shortages, and inadequate
infrastructure impede the development of comprehensive mental health systems. Addressing

resource constraints is crucial for ensuring equitable access to quality mental health care and
expanding services to underserved populations.
Shortages in the mental health workforce persist as a common challenge. The demand for
mental health professionals often exceeds the available supply, resulting in gaps in service
delivery. Adequate training programs, recruitment strategies, and retention initiatives are
essential to build a robust mental health workforce capable of meeting the diverse needs of
populations in both regions (Terregino et al., 2021).
Both the USA and African nations have opportunities to enhance mental health policy
implementation by integrating mental health services into primary care settings. This approach
promotes early intervention, reduces stigma, and ensures that mental health is treated with the
same importance as physical health. Collaborative care models that involve primary care
providers in mental health management can lead to more comprehensive and accessible
services.
Leveraging community resources and adopting community-based approaches offer promising
opportunities. In both contexts, involving communities in mental health initiatives enhances
engagement, promotes cultural sensitivity, and contributes to destigmatization. Community-
based programs can bridge gaps in access, particularly in underserved areas, and foster a sense
of collective responsibility for mental health (Shalev et al., 2020).
The evolving landscape of technology presents opportunities for innovative mental health
solutions. Telehealth, online counseling, and mobile applications can extend the reach of mental
health services, providing accessible and cost-effective options. Utilizing technology can
address geographical barriers, especially in remote areas, and enhance the overall efficiency of
mental health care delivery.
International collaboration plays a crucial role in addressing mental health disparities by
facilitating knowledge exchange and sharing best practices. Collaborative platforms enable
nations to learn from each other's successes and challenges, promoting a more informed and
evidence-based approach to mental health policy development and implementation.
Collaborative initiatives can focus on capacity building and training programs for mental health
professionals. By sharing expertise, resources, and training opportunities, nations can
collectively strengthen their mental health workforce. International partnerships can contribute
to the development of culturally competent professionals who are better equipped to address
the diverse needs of populations (Brottman et al., 2020).
Global collaboration enhances resource mobilization for mental health. International
organizations, governments, and advocacy groups can work together to mobilize funding,
influence policy agendas, and advocate for the prioritization of mental health on a global scale.
Joint efforts amplify the impact of advocacy initiatives, driving increased attention and
resources to mental health disparities.
In conclusion, the comparative review of mental health policies in the USA and African nations
reveals common challenges and shared opportunities. Addressing stigma, overcoming resource
constraints, and building a resilient workforce are challenges that demand concerted efforts.
Opportunities for improvement lie in the integration of mental health into primary care,
community-based approaches, and the utilization of technology. International collaboration
serves as a cornerstone for addressing mental health disparities, fostering a global commitment
to destigmatization, accessibility, and the creation of comprehensive mental health systems that
meet the diverse needs of populations worldwide (Okoro et al., 2024).
Conclusion
This comparative review has illuminated the diverse landscapes of mental health policies in the
United States and various African nations, showcasing the intricate interplay between cultural
factors, policy formulation, and the delivery of mental healthcare. From the historical evolution
of mental health policies to the contemporary emphasis on community-based approaches, the
review has underscored the unique challenges and innovative strategies adopted by both
regions. Cultural contexts have shaped the recognition of mental health as an integral
component of overall well-being, influencing policy initiatives that strive for inclusivity,
accessibility, and cultural competence.
In the United States, key legislative acts such as the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity
Act and the Affordable Care Act have contributed to dismantling barriers to mental health care,
emphasizing the integration of mental health services into mainstream healthcare. Meanwhile,
African nations have demonstrated a commitment to community-based approaches,
incorporating traditional healing practices, and tailoring interventions to cultural nuances.
A central theme emerging from the comparative review is the persistent challenge of cultural
stigma surrounding mental health, both in the United States and African nations. Despite
advancements in policy frameworks, cultural factors continue to contribute to reluctance in
seeking mental health support. Recognizing the intersection of cultural beliefs with mental
health perceptions, it is imperative to emphasize the need for ongoing efforts to destigmatize
mental health.
Destigmatization efforts should not be confined to policy formulation alone but should
permeate through educational initiatives, public awareness campaigns, and community
engagement programs. Creating a culture of open dialogue and understanding around mental
health is essential to foster an environment where individuals feel empowered to seek help
without fear of judgment or discrimination.
The complexity of mental health challenges demands a united and collaborative effort on a
global scale. Recognizing that mental health knows no borders, there is a critical need for
increased international collaboration and resource mobilization. Mental health policies should
transcend geopolitical boundaries and leverage shared knowledge, experiences, and best
practices.
This call to action involves establishing platforms for cross-cultural exchange, where nations
can learn from each other's successes and challenges. Collaborative research initiatives, training
programs, and cultural exchange opportunities for mental health professionals can contribute to
a more holistic and culturally sensitive approach to mental healthcare.
Resource mobilization is equally pivotal. Efforts should be directed towards securing funding
for mental health programs, training initiatives, and awareness campaigns. International
organizations, governments, and philanthropic entities must collaborate to ensure that mental
health receives the attention and resources commensurate with its impact on global well-being.
In conclusion, the comparative review between the USA and African nations highlights the
ongoing evolution of mental health policies in response to cultural dynamics. The journey
towards mental health equity requires a commitment to destigmatization, cultural competence,
and a collaborative approach that transcends borders. By recognizing the unique contributions
of diverse cultures and fostering a shared vision of mental health as a global priority, we can
pave the way for a future where mental healthcare is accessible, inclusive, and destigmatized
for individuals and communities around the world.
Reference
Agarwal, V., Sharma, A., Panicker, A., Shifa, S., & Rammurthy, R. (2022). Human rights in
mental health with specific focus on international standards and clinical practices.
International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, 15(1), 86-101.
Alegría, M., Frank, R.G., Hansen, H.B., Sharfstein, J.M., Shim, R.S., & Tierney, M. (2021).
Transforming mental health and addiction services: commentary describes steps to
improve outcomes for people with mental illness and addiction in the United States.
Health Affairs, 40(2), 226-234.
Alowais, S.A., Alghamdi, S.S., Alsuhebany, N., Alqahtani, T., Alshaya, A.I., Almohareb, S.N.,
Aldairem, A., Alrashed, M., Bin Saleh, K., Badreldin, H.A., & Al Yami, M.S. (2023).
Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC
Medical Education, 23(1), 689.
Anim, T.E., Rust, G., Strong, C., & Brown Speights, J.S. (2022). Population-based health care.
In Family Medicine: Principles and Practice (pp. 53-64). Cham: Springer International
Publishing.
Arakelyan, S., & Ager, A. (2021). Annual research review: a multilevel bioecological analysis
of factors influencing the mental health and psychosocial well‐being of refugee children.
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(5), 484-509.
Bell, M.C., Beckett, K., & Stuart, F. (2020). Investing in alternatives: Three logics of criminal
system replacement. UC Irvine Law Review, 11, 129.
Bemme, D., & Kirmayer, L.J. (2020). Global mental health: interdisciplinary challenges for a
field in motion. Transcultural Psychiatry, 57(1), 3-18.
Brottman, M.R., Char, D.M., Hattori, R.A., Heeb, R., & Taff, S.D. (2020). Toward cultural
competency in health care: a scoping review of the diversity and inclusion education
literature. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 803-813.
Campbell, A.L., & Shore-Sheppard, L. (2020). The social, political, and economic effects of
the Affordable Care Act: introduction to the issue. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation
Journal of the Social Sciences, 6(2), 1-40.
Codjoe, L., Barber, S., Ahuja, S., Thornicroft, G., Henderson, C., Lempp, H., & N’Danga-
Koroma, J. (2021). Evidence for interventions to promote mental health and reduce
stigma in Black faith communities: systematic review. Social Psychiatry and
Psychiatric Epidemiology, 56, 895-911.
Connolly, S.L., Kuhn, E., Possemato, K., & Torous, J. (2021). Digital clinics and mobile
technology implementation for mental health care. Current Psychiatry Reports, 23(7),
38.
Coombs, N.C., Meriwether, W.E., Caringi, J., & Newcomer, S.R. (2021). Barriers to healthcare
access among US adults with mental health challenges: A population-based study. SSM-
Population Health, 15, 100847.
Corbin, J.H., Oyene, U.E., Manoncourt, E., Onya, H., Kwamboka, M., Amuyunzu-Nyamongo,
M., Sørensen, K., Mweemba, O., Barry, M.M., Munodawafa, D., & Bayugo, Y.V.
(2021). A health promotion approach to emergency management: effective community

engagement strategies from five cases. Health Promotion International,
36(Supplement_1), i24-i38.
Delmelle, E.M., Desjardins, M.R., Jung, P., Owusu, C., Lan, Y., Hohl, A., & Dony, C. (2022).
Uncertainty in geospatial health: challenges and opportunities ahead. Annals of
Epidemiology, 65, 15-30.
Dopheide, J.A., Werremeyer, A., Haight, R.J., Gutierrez, C.A., & Williams, A.M. (2022).
Positioning psychiatric pharmacists to improve mental health care. Mental Health
Clinician, 12(2), 77-85.
Duncan, D.F., Ellis‐Griffith, G., Nicholson, T., & Nimkar, S. (2023). Health care administration
and drug policy. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 38(3),
735-746.
Essien, B., & Asamoah, M.K. (2020). Reviewing the common barriers to the mental healthcare
delivery in Africa. Journal of Religion and Health, 59, 2531-2555.
Fusar‐Poli, P., Correll, C.U., Arango, C., Berk, M., Patel, V., & Ioannidis, J.P. (2021).
Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people.
World Psychiatry, 20(2), 200-221.
Grum, B., & Kobal Grum, D. (2020). Concepts of social sustainability based on social
infrastructure and quality of life. Facilities, 38(11/12), 783-800.
Hoagwood, K.E., Purtle, J., Spandorfer, J., Peth-Pierce, R., & Horwitz, S.M. (2020). Aligning
dissemination and implementation science with health policies to improve children’s
mental health. American Psychologist, 75(8), 1130.
Im, H., Rodriguez, C., & Grumbine, J.M. (2021). A multitier model of refugee mental health
and psychosocial support in resettlement: Toward trauma-informed and culture-
informed systems of care. Psychological Services, 18(3), 345.
Kalariya, Y., Kumar, A., Ullah, A., Umair, A., Neha, F.N.U., Madhurita, F.N.U., Varagantiwar,
V., Jaffari, S.M.I.A., Ahmad, A., Aman, M., & Sapna, F.N.U. (2023). Integrative
medicine approaches: bridging the gap between conventional and renal complementary
therapies. Cureus, 15(9).
Kamau, S., Koskenranta, M., Kuivila, H., Oikarainen, A., Tomietto, M., Juntunen, J.,
Tuomikoski, A.M., & Mikkonen, K. (2022). Integration strategies and models to support
transition and adaptation of culturally and linguistically diverse nursing staff into
healthcare environments: An umbrella review. International Journal of Nursing Studies,
136, 104377.
Kasprowicz, V.O., Chopera, D., Waddilove, K.D., Brockman, M.A., Gilmour, J., Hunter, E.,
Kilembe, W., Karita, E., Gaseitsiwe, S., Sanders, E.J., & Ndung’u, T. (2020). African-
led health research and capacity building-is it working?. BMC Public Health, 20, 1-10.
Kirkbride, J.B., Anglin, D.M., Colman, I., Dykxhoorn, J., Jones, P.B., Patalay, P., Pitman, A.,
Soneson, E., Steare, T., Wright, T., & Griffiths, S.L. (2024). The social determinants of
mental health and disorder: evidence, prevention and recommendations. World
Psychiatry, 23(1), 58.
Koschorke, M., Oexle, N., Ouali, U., Cherian, A.V., Deepika, V., Mendon, G.B., Gurung, D.,
Kondratova, L., Muller, M., Lanfredi, M., & Lasalvia, A. (2021). Perspectives of
healthcare providers, service users, and family members about mental illness stigma in
primary care settings: A multi-site qualitative study of seven countries in Africa, Asia,
and Europe. PLoS One, 16(10), e0258729.
Kyere, E., & Fukui, S. (2023). Structural racism, workforce diversity, and mental health
disparities: A critical review. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 10(4),
1985-1996.
Mascayano, F., Toso-Salman, J., Ho, Y.C.S., Dev, S., Tapia, T., Thornicroft, G., Cabassa, L.J.,
Khenti, A., Sapag, J., Bobbili, S.J., & Alvarado, R. (2020). Including culture in
programs to reduce stigma toward people with mental disorders in low-and middle-
income countries. Transcultural Psychiatry, 57(1), 140-160.
Mazurek, K., Xue, W., & Beldon, M. (2022). Impact of ACA implementation on health related
quality of life among those with depressive disorders in the United States: A secondary
data analysis of the 2011-2017 BRFSS. Plos One, 17(3), e0266402.
McGorry, P.D., Mei, C., Chanen, A., Hodges, C., Alvarez‐Jimenez, M., & Killackey, E. (2022).
Designing and scaling up integrated youth mental health care. World Psychiatry, 21(1),
61-76.
Meisnere, M., South-Paul, J., Krist, A.H., & National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and
Medicine (2023). Evidence supporting whole health's foundational elements. In
Achieving Whole Health: A New Approach for Veterans and the Nation. National
Academies Press (US).
Menear, M., Dugas, M., Careau, E., Chouinard, M.C., Dogba, M.J., Gagnon, M.P., Gervais, M.,
Gilbert, M., Houle, J., Kates, N., & Knowles, S. (2020). Strategies for engaging patients
and families in collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders: A
systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 263, 528-539.
Mongelli, F., Georgakopoulos, P., & Pato, M.T. (2020). Challenges and opportunities to meet
the mental health needs of underserved and disenfranchised populations in the United
States. Focus, 18(1), 16-24.
Montesanti, S., Fitzpatrick, K., Fayant, B., & Pritchard, C. (2022). Identifying priorities,
directions and a vision for Indigenous mental health using a collaborative and
consensus-based facilitation approach. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 406.
Morales, D.A., Barksdale, C.L., & Beckel-Mitchener, A.C. (2020). A call to action to address
rural mental health disparities. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 4(5), 463-
467.
Nadkarni, A., Hanlon, C., & Patel, V. (2023). Mental health care models in low-and middle-
income countries. In Tasman’s Psychiatry (pp. 1-47). Cham: Springer International
Publishing.
Okoro, Y.O., Ayo-Farai, O., Maduka, C.P., Okongwu, C.C., & Sodamade, O.T. (2024). The
Role of technology in enhancing mental health advocacy: a systematic review.
International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 6(1), 37-50.
Okunade, B.A., Adediran, F.E., Maduka, C.P., & Adegoke, A.A. (2023). Community-Based
mental health interventions in Africa: a review and its implications for US healthcare
practices. International Medical Science Research Journal, 3(3), 68-91.
Osío, J.B. (2023). Unveiling the intersection: anthropological insights into health disparities
and well-being. Social Science Chronicle, 2, 1-20.
Paniagua, P., & Rayamajhee, V. (2022). A polycentric approach for pandemic governance:
Nested externalities and co-production challenges. Journal of Institutional Economics,
18(4), 537-552.
Patterson, A.S., Boadu, N.Y., Clark, M., Janes, C., Monteiro, N., Roberts, J.H., Shiffman, J.,
Thomas, D., & Wipfli, H. (2020). Investigating global mental health: contributions from
political science. Global Public Health, 15(6), 805-817.
Pearson, A.R., White, K.E., Nogueira, L.M., Lewis Jr, N.A., Green, D.J., Schuldt, J.P., &
Edmondson, D. (2023). Climate change and health equity: A research agenda for
psychological science. American Psychologist, 78(2), 244.
Pringle, B., Williams, M., & Collins, P.Y. (2021). Evidence for action: Stimulating research to
address the global mental health treatment gap. Innovations in Global Mental Health,
63-88.
Puffer, E.S., & Ayuku, D. (2022). A community-embedded implementation model for mental-
health interventions: reaching the hardest to reach. Perspectives on Psychological
Science, 17(5), 1276-1290.
Remaker, D.N., Gonzalez, M.M., Houston-Armstrong, T., & Sprague-Connors, G. (2021).
Women of color and mentorship in graduate training. Training and Education in
Professional Psychology, 15(1), 70.
Series, L. (2022). The law of institutions. In Deprivation of Liberty in the Shadows of the
Institution (pp. 32-52). Bristol University Press.
Shalev, D., Docherty, M., Spaeth-Rublee, B., Khauli, N., Cheung, S., Levenson, J., & Pincus,
H.A. (2020). Bridging the behavioral health gap in serious illness care: challenges and
strategies for workforce development. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry,
28(4), 448-462.
Sheather, J., Littler, K., Singh, J.A., & Wright, K. (2023). Ethics, climate change and health–a
landscape review. Wellcome Open Research, 8.
Sim, A., Ahmad, A., Hammad, L., Shalaby, Y., & Georgiades, K. (2023). Reimagining mental
health care for newcomer children and families: a qualitative framework analysis of
service provider perspectives. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 699.
Sirey, J.A., Pepin, R., Aizenstein, H., Taylor, W.D., Forester, B., Okereke, O., Byers, A.L., &
Bruce, M.L. (2023). Advanced Research Institute (ARI): supporting the geriatric mental
health research pipeline. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 31(12), 1209-
1215.
Song, Z., Johnston, R.M., & Ng, C.P. (2021). Equitable healthcare access during the pandemic:
The impact of digital divide and other sociodemographic and systemic factors. Applied
Research in Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing, 4(1), 19-33.
Stroul, B.A., Blau, G.M., & Larsen, J. (2021). The evolution of the system of care approach.
The Institute for Innovation and Implementation, School of Social Work, University of
Maryland. Retrieved, from https://www.cmhnetwork.org/wp-
content/uploads/2021/05/The-Evolution-of-the-SOC-Approach-FINAL-5-27-
20211.Pdf
Sweeting, K.D., & Haupt, B.B. (2024). Overcoming neutrality as an organizational learning
impediment. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 143-154.
Terregino, C.A., Byerley, J., Henderson, D.D., Friedman, E., Elks, M.L., Kirstein, I.J., Leep-
Hunderfund, A.N., & Fancher, T.L. (2021). Cultivating the physician workforce:
Recruiting, training, and retaining physicians to meet the needs of the population.
Medical teacher, 43(sup2), S39-S48.
Troup, J., Fuhr, D.C., Woodward, A., Sondorp, E., & Roberts, B. (2021). Barriers and
facilitators for scaling up mental health and psychosocial support interventions in low-
and middle-income countries for populations affected by humanitarian crises: a
systematic review. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 15, 1-14.
Walsh, D.A.B., & Foster, J.L.H. (2021). A call to action. A critical review of mental health
related anti-stigma campaigns. Frontiers in Public Health, 8, 990.

766-Article Text-2226-1-10-20240208

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

766-Article Text-2226-1-10-20240208

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

766-Article Text-2226-1-10-20240208

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Medical Science Research Journal, Volume 4, Issue 2, February 2024

MENTAL HEALTH POLICIES: A COMPARATIVE REVIEW

Article Received: 01-01-24 Accepted:27-01-24 Published: 08-02-24

infrastructure impede the development of comprehensive mental health systems. Addressing

(2021). A health promotion approach to emergency management: effective community

You might also like