Analytical Chemistry I - 010927-1
Analytical Chemistry I - 010927-1
Analytical Chemistry I - 010927-1
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I
UNIT ONE
• Meaning of Analytical Chemistry
Analytical chemistry is often described as the area of chemistry responsible for
characterizing the composition of matter, both qualitatively (what is present) and
quantitatively (how much is present). The craft of analytical chemistry is not in performing
a routine analysis on a routine sample which is more appropriately called (chemical
analysis), but in improving established methods, extending existing methods to new types
of samples, and developing new methods for measuring chemical phenomena. Here’s one
example of this distinction between analytical chemistry and chemical analysis. Mining
engineers evaluate the economic feasibility of extracting an ore by comparing the cost of
removing the ore with the value of its contents. To estimate its value, they analyze a sample
of the ore. The challenge of developing and validating the method providing this
information is the analytical chemist’s responsibility. Once developed, the routine, daily
application of the method becomes the job of the chemical analyst.
Analysis is a process that provides chemical or physical information about the constituents
in the sample or the sample itself. Qualitative analysis establishes the chemical identity of
the species in the sample. Quantitative analysis determines the relative amounts of these
species, or analytes, in numerical terms. The former deals with the identification of
elements, ions or compounds present in a sample (we may be interested in whether only a
given substance is present), while the latter deals with the determination of how much of
one or more constituents are present. The sample may be solid, liquid, gas or mixture.
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Qualitative tests may be performed by selective chemical reaction or with the use of
instrumentation. A clear distinction between selective and specific is that:
• A selective reaction or test is one that can occur with other substances but exhibits
a degree of preference for the substance of interest.
• A specific reaction or test is one that occurs only with the substance of interest.
Unfortunately, few reactions are specific but many exhibit selectivity.
Analytical chemistry seeks ever improved means of measuring the chemical composition
of natural and artificial materials. The techniques of this science are used to identify the
substances which may be present in a material and to determine the exact amounts of the
identified substance. Analytical chemistry is applied throughout all fields of study as
represented in fig 1.1 below. Some of the fields are;
2. Medicine: Analytical chemistry is the basis for clinical laboratory tests which help
physicians diagnose disease and chart progress in recovery.
3. Industry: It provides the means of testing raw materials and for assuring the quality of
finished products whose chemical composition is critical. Many household products,
fuels, paints, pharmaceuticals, etc. are analyzed by the procedures developed by
analytical chemists before being sold to the consumer.
4. Environmental Quality: This is often evaluated by testing for suspected contaminants
using the techniques of analytical chemistry.
5. Food and Nutrition: The nutritional value of food is determined by chemical analysis
for major components such as protein and carbohydrates and trace components such as
vitamins and minerals.
6. Forensic Science: Analytical chemistry techniques are needed to determine the
residues of narcotics, cannabis, barbiturates, and other hard drugs in criminals.
7. Archaeology: Archaeologists identify the source of volcanic glasses (obsidian) by
measuring concentrations of minor elements in samples taken from various locations.
This knowledge in turn makes it possible to trace prehistoric trade routes for tools and
weapons fashioned from obsidian.
8. Geology: The mineralogical composition of soil and rock is monitored using the
techniques developed by Analytical Chemistry.
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Analytical results are always reported as concentration based on weight (mass) or volume,
i.e. the quantity of analyte in a unit weight or unit volume of analyte.
Units of Measurements
The common units of mass/volume will be presented below. The basic unit of mass is
gram(g) in the metric system. It is the unit commonly used in macroanalysis. It has the
following subunits which are used for trace or ultra-trace constituents in samples;
Other subunits for quantities used by scientists are the following prefixes in the table below.
❖ Percent Concentration
Chemists frequently express concentrations in terms of percent (parts per hundred).
Unfortunately, this practice can be a source of ambiguity because percent composition of
a solution can be expressed in several ways. Three common methods are weight solute
𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒
Weight percent (w/w) = X 100%
𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒
Volume percent (v/v) = X 100%
𝑣𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Note that the denominator in each of these expressions refers to the solution rather than to
the solvent. Note also that the first two expressions do not depend on the units employed
(provided, of course, that there is consistency between numerator and denominator). In the
third expression, units must be defined because the numerator and denominator have
different units that do not cancel. Of the three expressions, only weight percent has the
virtue of being temperature independent. Weight percent is frequently employed to express
the concentration of commercial aqueous reagents. For example, nitric acid is sold as a
70% solution, which means that the reagent contains 70 g of HN03 per 100 g of solution.
❖ Parts per million: Micrograms of solute per gram of solution; for aqueous solutions
the units are often expressed as milligrams of solute per liter of solution (ppm). Parts
per billion: Nanograms of solute per gram of solution; for aqueous solutions the units
are often expressed as micrograms of solute per liter of solution (ppb).
For concentration in parts per million and parts per billion (w/w);
Parts per million (ppm) and parts per billion (ppb) are mass ratios of grams of solute to
one million or one billion grams of sample, respectively. For example, a steel that is 450
ppm in Mn contains 450 mg of Mn for every gram of steel. If we approximate the density
of an aqueous solution as 1.00 g/mL, then solution concentrations can be expressed in parts
per million or parts per billion using the following relationships. For gases a part per
million usually is a volume ratio. Thus, a helium concentration of 6.3ppm means that one
liter of air contains 6.3 mL of He.
❖ Molarity: The number of moles of solute per litre of solution (M). Molarity is the
concentration of a particular chemical species in solution.
𝒎𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒆
Molarity =
𝑳𝒊𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏
❖ Normality: The number of equivalents of solute per liter of solution (N). Normality
makes use of the chemical equivalent, which is the amount of one chemical species
reacting stoichiometrically with another chemical species. Note that this definition
makes an equivalent, and thus normality, a function of the chemical reaction in which
the species participates. Although a solution of H2SO4 has a fixed molarity, its normality
depends on how it reacts. The number of equivalents, n, is based on a reaction unit,
which is that part of a chemical species involved in a reaction. In a precipitation
reaction, for example, the reaction unit is the charge of the cation or anion involved in
the reaction; thus for the reaction
n = 2 for Pb2+and n = 1 for I–. In an acid–base reaction, the reaction unit is the number of
H+ ions donated by an acid or accepted by a base. For the reaction between sulfuric acid
and ammonia
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Equivalent weight: The mass of a compound containing one equivalent (EW). Formula
weight: The mass of a compound containing one mole (FW).
𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒆
No of EWs solute =
𝑬𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒗𝒂𝒍𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒘𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕
𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒆
Normality = ×n
𝑭𝒐𝒓𝒎𝒖𝒍𝒂 𝒘𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 × 𝑳𝒊𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏
Consequently, the following simple relationship exists between normality and molarity.
N = n×M
❖ Molality: The number of moles of solute per kilogram of solvent (m). This is given by
number of moles of solute per 1000grams of the solvent.
𝒎𝒐𝒍𝒆𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒓 𝒏
Molality (m) = ×1000
𝑲𝒊𝒍𝒐𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒎 𝒐𝒇 𝒔𝒐𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒐𝒓 𝑾
1. What is the molarity of a solution made by dissolving 2.355 g of sulfuric acid in water
and diluting to a final volume of 50.0 mL?
2. Hydrochloric acid is sold commercially as a 12.0 M solution. How many moles of HCl
are in 300.0 mL of 12.0 M solution?
3. Calculate the equivalent weight and normality for a solution of 6.0 M H3PO4 given the
following reactions:
(a) H3PO4(aq) + 3OH–(aq) PO43–(aq) + 3H2O(l)
(b) H3PO4(aq) + 2NH3(aq) HPO42–(aq) + 2NH4+(aq)
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Preparation of Solutions
Preparing a solution of known concentration is perhaps the most common activity in any
analytical lab. The method for measuring out the solute and solvent depend on the desired
concentration units, and how exact the solution’s concentration needs to be known. Pipets
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
and volumetric flasks are used when a solution’s concentration must be exact; graduated
cylinders, beakers, and reagent bottles suffice when concentrations need only be
approximate. Two methods for preparing solutions are described in this section.
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠
Molar concentration =
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 (𝑑𝑚3 𝑜𝑟 𝐿)
𝑔
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑑𝑚3)
Molar concentration =
𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 (𝑔/𝑚𝑜𝑙)
Also, mass concentration (g/dm3) =molar concentration X Molar mass. Therefore, standard
solution can be prepared in moldm-3 or gdm-3.
Example 1
Describe the preparation of 500cm3 solution of 0.5 moldm-3 (0.5M) of solution hydroxide
solution.
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Solution
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑠
Molar concentration =
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒 (𝑑𝑚3 𝑜𝑟 𝐿)
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻
Mole =
𝑀𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑁𝑎𝑂𝐻
Hence, to prepare 500mL of 0.5 solution of NaOH, weigh accurately 10g of NaOH and
dissolve distilled water of 500mL of volumetric flask. The beaker is rinsed repeatedly with
small portions of water, which are added to the volumetric flask. This process, which is
called a quantitative transfer, ensures that the NaOH is completely transferred to the
volumetric flask. Finally, additional water is added to the volumetric flask’s calibration
mark.
Example 2
Describe the preparation of 500cm3 of 3M H2SO4 from the consented reagent the labeled
on the bottle states that the reagent is 95% H2SO4 has a specific gravity of 1.84?
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Solution
The specific gravity (or density) of 1.84g H2SO4 if it 98% pure H2SO4
98 × 1.84𝑔
∴ 1cm3 of the acid will contain = 1.80g of H2SO4
100
1.80𝑔
∴ 1cm3 of the acid contains = 0.0184 mol of H2SO4
98𝑔/𝑚𝑜𝑙
CiVi = CfVf
3𝑀 ×500𝑚𝐿
Vi = = 81.52mL
18.4 𝑀
Hence, to prepare 3M H2SO4 take 81.52cm3 of the concentrated reagent and dilute to
500mL with distilled water.
Example 3
Solution
To find the concentration of the concentrated acid in the bottle, we start from the
information we have;
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
37𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝐻𝐶𝑙
37% (w/w) =
100𝑔 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
CiVi = Cf Vf
0.5𝑀 ×1000𝑚𝐿
Vi = =41.7cm3
12𝑀
Hence, to prepare 0.5M HCl, take 41.7cm3 of the concentrated reagent and dilute to
1000cm3 (1dm3) with distilled water.
Solutions with small concentrations are often prepared by diluting a more concentrated
stock solution. A known volume of the stock solution is transferred to a new container and
brought to a new volume. Dilution is e process of preparing a less concentrated solution
from a more concentrated solution. For convenience, chemicals are sometimes bought and
stored as concentrated solutions that must be diluted before use. Aqueous hydrochloric
acid, for example, is sold commercially as a 12.0M solution, yet it is most commonly used
in the laboratory after dilution with water to a final concentration of 6.0M or 1.0M.
Since the total amount of solute is the same before and after dilution, we know that
Ci × Vi = Cf × Vf
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
where Ci is the concentration of the stock solution, Vi is the volume of the stock solution
being diluted, Cf is the concentration of the dilute solution, and Vf is the volume of the
dilute solution. Again, the type of glassware used to measure Vi and Vf depends on how
exact the solution’s concentration must be known. Rearranging this equation into a more
useful form shows that the molar concentration after dilution (Cf) can be found by
multiplying the initial concentration (Ci) by the ratio of initial and final volumes (Vi/Vf):
𝑉𝑖
Cf = Ci ×
𝑉𝑓
𝐶𝑖
Cf = Ci = Cf × DF
𝐷𝐹
𝑉𝑖 𝑀𝑖
Where DF (Dilution Factor) = =
𝑉𝑓 𝑀𝑓
Suppose, for example, that we dilute 50.0 mL of a solution of 2.00 M to a volume of 200.0
mL. The solution volume increases by a factor of four (from 50 mL to 200 mL), so the
concentration of the solution must decrease by a factor of four (from 2.00 M to 0.500 M):
50.0𝑚𝐿
Cf = 2.00M × = 0.500M
200.0𝑚𝐿
𝑉𝑓 200.0𝑚𝐿
Dilution Factor DF = = =4
𝑉𝑖 50.0𝑚𝐿
Exercise
1. How would you prepare 500.0 mL of 0.2500 M NaOH solution starting from a
concentration of 1.000 M?
2. Describe how you would prepare the following three solutions: (a) 500 mL of
approximately 0.20 M NaOH using solid NaOH; (b) 1 L of 150.0 ppm Cu2+ using Cu
metal; and (c) 2 L of 4% v/v acetic acid using concentrated glacial acetic acid?
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
UNIT TWO
The whole essence of chemical analysis is to have good accuracy and good precision.
Measurements invariably involve errors and uncertainties. Only a few of these are due to
mistakes on the part of the experimenter. More commonly, errors are caused by faulty
calibrations or standardizations or random variations and uncertainties in results. Frequent
calibrations, standardizations, and analyses of known samples can sometimes be used to
lessen all but the random errors and uncertainties. In the limit, however, measurement
errors are an inherent part of the quantized world in which we live. Because of this, it is
impossible to perform a chemical analysis that is totally free of errors or uncertainties. We
can only hope to minimize errors and estimate their size with acceptable accuracy. In this
unit, we explore the nature of experimental errors and their effects on the results of
chemical analyses.
Concept of Errors
The term error has two slightly different meanings. First, error refers to the difference
between a measured value and the "true" or "known" value. Second, error often denotes
the estimated uncertainty in a measurement or experiment.
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Errors are normal in science or chemical analysis. Every measurement has an associated
error that can be quantified or determined and can be avoided. Although, some errors are
inherent in analysis and cannot be eliminated but can be minimized.
the precision of an analysis in which the only source of variability (spread) is the
analysis of replicate samples.
➢ Reproducibility is the precision that is associated with replicate analysis of a
sample over a long period of time often in different laboratory conditions. It is the
precision obtained under any other set of conditions, including that between
analysts, or between laboratory sessions for a single analyst. The precision when
comparing results for several samples, for several analysts, or several methods.
➢ Replicates are samples of about the same size that are carried through an analysis
in exactly the same way.
➢ Analytes: The components or constituents of interest in a sample.
➢ Matrix: All other constituents in a sample except for the analytes.
Types of Errors
There are at least two types of error that can affect the accuracy or precision of a measured
quantity. They are Determinate and Indeterminate errors.
❖ Determinate/Systematic errors are those that, as the name implies, are determinable
and that are presumably can be either avoided or corrected. They may be constant, as
in the case of an uncalibrated weight or glassware that is used in all weighing and
measurements. Or, they may be variable but of such a nature that they can be accounted
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
for and corrected, such as a burette whose volume readings are in error by different
amounts at different volumes. Such measurable determinate errors are classed as
systematic errors. Some of the common determinate errors are:
1. Personal/operative errors: These errors result from personal or the operator of the
instrument or due to carelessness on the part of the analyst. Also, analyst inability
to differentiate between colour changes at the end point during titration due to colour
blindness, mathematical errors in calculation and prejudice in estimating
measurements.
3. Reagent error: These errors arise from presence of impurities in a reagent used in
the analysis. A high purity reagent should be used to give good yield of the analysis.
4. Method error: These are the most serious errors of an analysis. Most of the above
errors can be minimized or corrected for, but errors that are inherent in the method
cannot be changed unless the conditions of the determination are altered. Some
sources of methodic errors include coprecipitation of impurities, slight solubility of
a precipitate, side reactions, incomplete reactions and impurities. Sometimes
correction can be relatively simple for example, by running a reagent blank.
❖ Indeterminate errors: These errors are often called accidental or random errors,
which represent the experimental uncertainty that occurs in any measurement. These
errors are revealed by small differences in successive measurements made by analyst
under virtually identical conditions and they cannot be predicted or estimated.
Indeterminate errors can be traced to several sources, including the collection of samples,
the manipulation of samples during the analysis, and the making of measurement. When
collecting a sample, for instance, only a small portion of the available material is taken,
increasing the likelihood that small-scale inhomogeneities in the sample will affect the
repeatability of the analysis. Individual pennies, for example, are expected to show
variation from several sources, including the manufacturing process, and the loss of small
amounts of metal or the addition of dirt during circulation. These variations are sources of
indeterminate error associated with the sampling process. During the analysis numerous
opportunities arise for random variations in the way individual samples are treated. In
determining the mass of a penny, for example, each penny should be handled in the same
manner. Cleaning some pennies but not cleaning others introduces an indeterminate error.
The accuracy of measurements or methods can be estimated using the absolute error or
relative absolute error, RAE.
• Absolute Error (Bias) is calculated as µ-x, where µ is the accepted true value and
x is the mean value of the measurement. It gives the bias that occurred between the
values.
µ−𝑋 µ−𝑋
R.A.E = × 100% or = × 1000‰
µ µ
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Also, the precision of the measurements can be evaluated using standard deviation, relative
standard deviation or coefficient of variation, standard error, etc.
• Standard deviation: It is related to stated mean (X), the higher the standard
deviation is equal to poor precision. The absolute standard deviation, s, describes
the spread of individual measurements about the mean and is given as
Sd = Σ(x-xi)2
n-1
𝑆 𝑆
Rsd = ×100% or ×1000‰
𝑋 𝑋
• Standard Error: It is sometimes referred to standard deviation of the mean Smean, and
is calculated
Smean = S
√N
Class Exercise
1. A sample of soil was analysed in replicate for its organic carbon content. The following
results were obtained:
2.34, 2.44, 2.29, 2.45, 2.53, 2.42, 2.42, 2.33, 2.51, 2.30 (%)
The organic carbon content had been previously established to be 2.56%. How
accurate is the result?
2. A plant sample was analysed in replicate for the concentration of phosphate-
phosphorus. The following results were obtained:
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
i. Absolute error
v. Coefficient of variation
vii. Variance
UNIT THREE
Sampling is one of the most important operations in a chemical analysis analyses use only
a small fraction of the available sample. Knowing how much sample to collect and to
further subdivide the collected sample to obtain a laboratory sample is vital in the analytical
process. The sampling process involves obtaining a small amount of material that
accurately represents the bulk of the material being analyzed. Acquiring a representative
sample is a statistical process. A chemical analysis is most often performed on only a small
fraction of the material whose composition is of interest. Clearly, the composition of this
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
fraction must reflect as closely as possible the average composition of the bulk of the
material if the results are to have value. The process by which a representative fraction is
acquired is termed sampling. Often, sampling is the most difficult step in the entire
analytical process and the step that limits the accuracy of the procedure. This statement is
particularly true when the material to be analyzed is a large and inhomogeneous liquid,
such as a lake, or an inhomogeneous solid, such as an ore, a soil, or a piece of animal tissue.
1. Random Sampling: A sample collected at random from the target population. The ideal
sampling plan provides an unbiased estimate of the target population’s properties. This
requirement is satisfied if the sample is collected at random from the target population.
Despite its apparent simplicity, a true random sample is difficult to obtain. Haphazard
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
sampling, in which samples are collected without a sampling plan, is not random and
may reflect an analyst’s unintentional biases. The best method for ensuring the
collection of a random sample is to divide the target population into equal units, assign
a unique number to each unit, and use a random number table to select the units from
which to sample. A randomly collected sample makes no assumptions about the target
population, making it the least biased approach to sampling. On the other hand, random
sampling requires more time and expense than other sampling methods since a greater
number of samples are needed to characterize the target population.
2. Judgmental Sampling: The opposite of random sampling is selective, or judgmental
sampling, in which we use available information about analyte distribution in the target
population to help select samples. Because assumptions about the target population are
included in the sampling plan, judgmental sampling is more biased than random
sampling; however, fewer samples are required. Judgmental sampling is common when
we wish to limit the number of independent variables influencing the results of an
analysis. For example, a researcher studying the bioaccumulation of polychlorinated
biphenyls (PCBs) in fish may choose to exclude fish that are too small or that appear
diseased.
3. Systematic Sampling: Random sampling and judgmental sampling represent extremes
in bias and the number of samples needed to accurately characterize the target
population. Systematic sampling falls in between these extremes. In systematic
sampling the target population is sampled at regular intervals in space or time. For a
system exhibiting a spatial heterogeneity, such as the distribution of dissolved O2 in a
lake, samples can be systematically collected by dividing the system into discrete units
using a two- or three-dimensional grid pattern. Samples are collected from the center
of each unit, or at the intersection of grid lines. When a heterogeneity is time-dependent,
as is common in clinical studies, samples are drawn at regular intervals.
4. Systematic-Judgmental sampling: A sampling plan that combines judgmental
sampling with systematic sampling. This is encountered in environmental studies when
a spatial or temporal distribution of pollutants is anticipated. For example, a plume of
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
waste leaching from a landfill can reasonably be expected to move in the same direction
as the flow of groundwater. The systematic–judgmental sampling plan includes a
rectangular grid for systematic sampling and linear transects extending the sampling
along the plume’s suspected major and minor axes.
5. Stratified Sampling: A sampling plan that divides the population into distinct strata
from which random samples are collected. Another combination of the three primary
approaches to sampling is judgmental–random, or stratified sampling. Many target
populations are conveniently subdivided into distinct units, or strata. For example, in
determining the concentration of particulate Pb in urban air, the target population can
be subdivided by particle size. In this case samples can be collected in two ways. In a
random sampling, differences in the strata are ignored, and individual samples are
collected at random from the entire target population. In a stratified sampling the target
population is divided into strata, and random samples are collected from within each
stratum. Strata are analyzed separately, and their respective means are pooled to give
an overall mean for the target population. The advantage of stratified sampling is that
the composition of each stratum is often more homogeneous than that of the entire target
population.
Three methods are commonly used to obtain samples: grab sampling, composite sampling,
and in situ sampling.
• Grab sample: A single sample removed from the target population at a given time and
location in space. A grab sample, therefore, provides a “snapshot” of the target
population. Grab sampling is easily adapted to any of the sampling schemes discussed
in the previous section. A systematic sampling using grab samples can be used to
characterize a target population whose composition varies over time or space. Grab
sampling is carried out on homogeneous materials especially for small size
homogeneous. We homogenize a small bulk of small size heterogenous sample. It can
be done grinding, blending, crushing, stirring, mixing and then carry out grab sampling.
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Large size homogeneous can not be converted to small size homogeneous, therefore,
we do compositing.
• Composite Sample: A composite sample consists of a set of grab samples that are
combined to form a single sample. After thoroughly mixing, the composite sample is
analyzed. Because information is lost when individual samples are combined, it is
normally desirable to analyze each grab sample separately. In some situations, however,
there are advantages to working with composite samples. One such situation is in
determining a target population’s average composition over time or space. For example,
wastewater treatment plants are required to monitor and report the average composition
of treated water released to the environment. One approach is to analyze a series of
individual grab samples, collected using a systematic sampling plan, and average the
results. Alternatively, the individual grab samples can be combined to form a single
composite sample. Analyzing a single composite sample instead of many individual
grab samples, provides an appreciable savings in time and cost. Composite sampling is
also useful when a single sample cannot supply sufficient material for an analysis. For
example, methods for determining PCBs in fish often require as much as 50 g of tissue,
an amount that may be difficult to obtain from a single fish. Tissue samples from several
fish can be combined and homogenized, and a 50-g portion of the composite sample
taken for analysis.
• In situ Sampling: An analytical sensor is placed directly in the target population,
allows continuous monitoring without removing individual grab samples. For example,
the pH of a solution moving through an industrial production line can be continually
monitored by immersing a pH electrode within the solution’s flow.
The term titrimetry or volumetry referrers to quantitative chemical analysis carried out
by determining the volume of a solution of accurately known concentration which is
required to react quantitatively with a measured volume of a solution of a substance to be
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
determined. Volumetric methods are much more easily used than gravimetry because they
are more rapid and convenient, but very good accuracy can be obtained with gravimetric
analysis.
Titrimetric methods are classified into four groups based on the type of reaction involved.
These groups are:
• Acid-Base titrations: This is a titration in which an acidic or basic titrant reacts with
an analyte that is a base or an acid.
• Complexometric titrations: This involving a metal–ligand complexation reaction.
• Redox titrations: This is where the titrant is an oxidizing or reducing agent.
• Precipitation titrations: This involves the analyte and titrant react to form a
precipitate.
• End point: The end point is the point in a titration when a physical change occurs that
is associated with the condition of chemical equivalence. We cannot determine the
equivalence point of a titration experimentally. Instead, we can only estimate its
position by observing some physical change associated with the condition of
equivalence. This change is called the end point for the titration. The difference in
volume or mass between the equivalence point and the end point is the titration error.
• Indicators: Indicator is mostly used in volumetric analysis. An indicator is a compound
that has physical properties usually colour or electrical signal that changes abruptly near
the equivalence point. The change is caused by the sudden disappearance of analyte or
appearance of titrant at the equivalence point. Examples of acid-base indicators shown
in table 9.4.
• Back titration: Back-titration is a process in which the excess of a standard solution
used to consume an analyte is determined by titration with a second standard solution.
Back-titrations are often required when the rate of reaction between the analyte and
reagent is slow or when the standard solution lacks stability. For example, the amount
of phosphate in a sample can be determined by adding a measured excess of standard
silver nitrate to a solution of the sample, which leads to the formation of insoluble silver
phosphate:
Ag+ + PO43- Ag3PO4(s)
The excess silver nitrate is then back-titrated with a standard solution of potassium
thiocyanate:
Ag+ + SCN- AgSCN(s)
Here, the amount of silver nitrate is chemically equivalent to the amount of phosphate
ion plus the amount of thiocyanate used for the back-titration.
Primary Standards
i. High purity: It should be 100% pure, although 0.01 – 0.02% impurities is tolerable.
ii. Atmospheric Stability: The primary standard is stable to dry temperature.
iii. Absence of hydrated water so that the composition of the solid does not change with
variations in humidity.
iv. Readily available at a modest cost.
v. Reasonablely large molar mass so that the relative error associated with weighing the
standard is minimized.
vi. Equilibrium to the reaction should be far to the right.
Very few compounds meet or even approach these criteria, and only a limited number
of primary-standard substances are available commercially. As a consequence, less pure
compounds must sometimes be used in place of a primary standard. The purity of such
a secondary standard must be established by careful analysis. A secondary standard
is a compound whose purity has been established by chemical analysis and that serves
as the reference material for a titrimetric method of analysis.
For titrimetric or volumetric analysis to be applied or be used, the reaction between the
titrant and sample solution (analyte) must fulfilled the following conditions:
1. The reaction should be stoichiometric (i.e., well-defined and known reaction between
the analyte and titrant).
2. The reaction should be fast or rapid.
3. There should be no side reaction.
4. The reaction should be specific.
5. There should be a marked change in the properties or in some electrical or other
physical properties of the solution.
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
6. The reaction should be quantitative (i.e., the equilibrium to the reaction should proceed
forward, i.e., irreversible).
5. 45.7cm3 of 0.500moldm-3 H2SO4 are required to react completely with 20.0cm3 sample
of NaOH solution. H2SO4(aq) + 2NaOH(aq) 2H2O(l) + Na2SO4(aq). What is the
concentration of NaOH solution in: (i.) moldm-3 (ii.) gdm-3.
Gravimetric Analysis
Gravimetric methods are quantitative methods that are based on determining the mass of a
pure compound to which the analyte is chemically related. This method is one of the most
accurate and precise method of macro-quantitative analysis. In this process, the analyte is
selectively converted to an insoluble form. The separated precipitate is dried or ignited,
possibly to another form and is accurately weighed. From the weight of the precipitate and
knowledge of its chemical composition, we can calculate the weight of analyte in the
desired form. There are several methods of gravimetric analysis;
Precipitation Gravimetry
The precipitate is filtered using a weighed filtering crucible, then dried and ignited. This
process converts the precipitate entirely to calcium oxide. The reaction is
After cooling, the crucible and precipitate are weighed, and the mass of calcium oxide is
determined by subtracting the known mass of the crucible. The calcium content of the
sample is then computed as will be shown later.
In gravimetric analysis, two experimental measurements are required. First, the mass of
the sample taken (natural water containing calcium), and secondly the mass of a product
of known composition derived from the sample (precipitate). Ordinarily, these data are
converted to a percentage of analyte by a simple mathematical manipulation.
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐴
%A= × 100%
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒
The species that is actually isolated and weighed either contains A or can be chemically
related to A. In either case, gravimetric factor (G.F.) is needed to convert the mass of the
precipitate to the corresponding mass of A.
Where a and b are small integers that take such values as necessary to make the number of
formula mass in the numerator and denominator chemically equivalent. The equation can
now be converted to the more useful form:
𝑎 𝐹.𝑀. 𝑜𝑓 𝐴
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑝𝑡 × 𝑏 𝐹.𝑀. 𝑜𝑓 𝑝𝑝𝑡 ×100%
%A =
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒
1. 0.703-gram sample of a commercial detergent was ignited at a red heat to destroy the
organic matter. The residue was then taken up in hot HCl which converted the P to
H3PO4. The phosphate was precipitated as MgNH4PO4.6H2O by addition of Mg2+
followed by aqueous NH3. After being filtered and washed, the precipitate was
converted to Mg2P2O7 (formula mass = 222.6) by ignition at 100℃. This residue
weighed 0.432-gram. Calculate the percentage of phosphorus, P (formula mass = 30.97)
in the sample.
2. 1.236 grams of an herbicide was decomposed with metallic sodium in alcohol. The
chloride ion liberated by this treatment was precipitated as AgCl and found to weigh
0.1840g. Calculate the percentage of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (C8H6O3Cl2,
formula mass = 221) in the sample.
3. The aluminum in a 0.910-g sample of impure ammonium aluminum sulfate was
precipitated with aqueous ammonia as the hydrous Al2O3.xH2O. The precipitate was
filtered and ignited at 1000°C to give anhydrous A12O3, which weighed 0.2001 g.
Express the result of this analysis in terms of
(a) % NH4Al(SO4)2 (b) % A12O3 (c) % Al
UNIT FOUR
CHROMATOGRAPHY
Chromatography refers to continuous equilibration of solute between two phases
(mobile and stationary). The mobile phase can be a liquid or a gas while the stationary
phase solid or liquid. The main purpose of mobile phase is to carry the solute through
the chromatographic column. The main factor causing the separation of a solute in the
stationary phase is distribution coefficient. The interaction of solute on the stationary
phase may either be adsorption, dissolution, ion-exchange, molecular size and/or
partition. Each type of interaction give rise to a distinct type of chromatography.
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Classification of Chromatography
Chromatographic process can be classified according to the equilibration process
involved. This is governed by the type of stationary phases used and equilibration are
base on.
1. Adsorption chromatography: In adsorption chromatography, the stationary phase
is solid on which sample components are adsorbed. The mobile phase maybe a liquid
(liquid-solid chromatography) or gas (gas-solid chromatography). The components
or solutes distribute between two phases through a combination of sorption and
desorption processes. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is a special example of
sorption chromatography in which the stationary phase is a “plane” in the form of
solid support on an inert plate, and the mobile phase is a liquid.
2. Partition chromatography: The stationary phase of a partition chromatography is
a liquid supported by an inert solid. Again, the mobile phase maybe a liquid (liq.-liq.
partition chromatography) or a gas (gas-liquid chromatography). Example is a paper
chromatography in which the stationary phase is a layer of water adsorbed on a sheet
of paper. In the normal mode of operations of liquid-liquid partition chromatography,
a polar stationary phase (e.g., methanol on silica) is used with a non-polar mobile
phase (e.g. hexane). This combination of polar and non-polar phases in liquid form
favours the retention of polar compounds and elution of non-polar compounds and
the process is called Normal Phase Chromatography. If a non-polar stationary phase
is used with a polar mobile phase, then the non-polar solutes are retained more and
polar solutes are readily eluted. This process is called Reverse Phase
Chromatography.
3. Ion-exchange and Size exclusion chromatography: Ion-exchange
chromatography uses ion-exchange resins. The mechanism of ion-exchange
chromatography is based on ion-exchange equilibria. In pore-penetration or size
exclusion chromatography, solvated molecules are separated according to their sizes
by their ability to penetrate a sieve-like structure (stationary phase).
CHM 219 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY I READING NOTE
Separation methods that are common in use to separate analyte from interferents are:
factors may preclude the use of precipitation to achieve a separation. For example, the
various coprecipitation phenomena may cause extensive contamination of a precipitate
by an unwanted component, even though the solubility product of the contaminant has
not been exceeded. Likewise, the rate of an otherwise feasible precipitation may be too
slow to be useful for a separation. Finally, when precipitates form as colloidal
suspensions, coagulation may be difficult and slow, particularly when the isolation of a
small quantity of a solid phase is attempted.