CH 3
CH 3
CH 3
EXPLORATORY RESEARCH
Exploration is particularly useful when researchers lack a clear idea of the problems they will
meet during the study. Through exploration researchers develop concepts more clearly,
establish priorities, develop operational definitions, and improve the final research design.
Exploration serves other purposes as well. The area of investigation may be so new or so vague
that a researcher needs to do an exploration just to learn something about the dilemma facing
the manager. Important variables may not be known or thoroughly defined. Hypotheses for the
research may be needed. Also, the researcher may explore to be sure it is practical to do a
formal study in the area. More realistically, exploration may save both time and money and
should not be slighted.
The exploratory research strategy usually comprises one or more of the following:
• Discovery and analysis of secondary sources;
• Published studies (usually focused on the results of surveys or on case studies);
• Document analysis.
• Retrieval of information from organization’s database(s);
• Interviews with those knowledgeable about the problem or its possible solutions (called
expert interviews);
• Interviews with individuals involved with the problem (called individual depth
interviews , or IDIs);
• Group discussions with individuals involved with the problem or its possible solutions
(including informal groups, as well as focus groups or brainstorming).
The formidable problem that follows the task of defining the research problem is the
preparation of the design of the research project, popularly known as the “research design”. A
research design is a master plan that specifies the methods and procedures for collecting and
analyzing the needed information. It provides a framework or plan of action for the research.
In formulating a research design, the researcher has to balance the perspectives of decision-
makers and target respondents. From their education and experience, decision-makers may
have certain techniques that they believe to be the most effective and in which they
subsequently have more confidence. Thus, research design involves the researcher developing
an understanding of the type of data decision-makers have confidence in, plus an
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
As the research problem or topic has been explored, the researcher may consider many
different types of information sources, some much more valuable than others. Information
sources are generally categorized into three levels: (1) primary sources, (2) secondary sources,
and (3) tertiary sources.
Primary sources are original works of research or raw data without interpretation or
pronouncements that represent an official opinion or position. Included among the primary
sources are memos; letters; complete interviews or speeches (in audio, video, or written
transcript formats); laws; regulations; court decisions or standards; and most government data,
including census, economic, and labor data. Primary sources are always the most authoritative
because the information has not been filtered or interpreted by a second party. Other internal
sources of primary data are inventory records, personnel records, purchasing requisition forms,
statistical process control charts, and similar data.
Secondary sources are interpretations of primary data. Secondary data means data that are
already available i.e., they refer to the data which have already been collected and analyzed by
someone else. Encyclopedias, textbooks, handbooks, magazine and newspaper articles, and
most newscasts are considered secondary information sources. Indeed, nearly all reference
materials fall into this category. Internally, sales analysis summaries and investor annual reports
would be examples of secondary sources, because they are compiled from a variety of primary
sources. To an outsider, however, the annual report is viewed as a primary source, because it
represents the official position of the corporation. A firm searching for secondary sources can
search either internally or externally.
Tertiary sources may be interpretations of a secondary source but generally are represented by
indexes, bibliographies, and other finding aids (e.g., Internet search engines).
From the beginning, it is important to remember that all information is not of equal value. As
the source levels indicate, primary sources have more value than secondary sources, and
secondary sources have more value than tertiary sources.
Primary data is information collected directly from the first-hand experience and thus happen
to be original in character. This is the information that one gathers for the purpose of a
particular research project. It can be a long process but does provide important first-hand
information in many business cases.
Up-to-date information
The primary market research is a great source of latest and up-to-date information as the
researcher collects it directly from the field in real time. Usually, secondary data is not so up-to-
date and recent.
More expensive
It could be very expensive to obtain primary data collection because the researcher or the
research team has to start from the beginning. It means they have to follow the whole study
procedure, organizing materials, process and etc.
Time consuming
It is a matter of a lot of time to conduct the research from the beginning to the end as it needs a
large enough sample to make the sample credible and be able to generalize . Often it is much longer in
comparison with the time needed to collect secondary data.
Can have a lot of limits
Primary data is limited to the specific time, place or number of participants and etc. To
compare, secondary data can come from a variety of sources to give more details.
There are several methods of collecting primary data. Mostly used ones are:
(i) Observation method,
(ii) Interview method,
(iii) through questionnaires,
(iv) through schedules, and
(v) other methods include (a) warranty cards; (b) distributor audits; (c) pantry audits;
(d) Consumer panels; (e) depth interviews, and (f) content analysis.
i. Observation
The observation method is the most commonly used method in studies relating to behavioral
sciences. In a way we all observe things around us, but this sort of observation is not scientific
observation. Observation is a scientific tool and the method of data collection whereby the
information sought is gathered by way of investigator’s own direct observation without asking
from the respondent.
The main advantage of this method is that subjective bias is eliminated, if observation is done
accurately. Secondly, the information obtained under this method relates to what is currently
happening; it is not complicated by either the past behavior or future intentions or attitudes.
Thirdly, this method is independent of respondents’ willingness to respond and as such is
relatively less demanding of active cooperation on the part of respondents as happens to be
the case in the interview or the questionnaire method.
The two types of observation examined are- Participant Observation and Structured
Observation. Participant observation is qualitative in nature and emphasizes on discovering the
ii. Interview
The interview method of collecting data involves presentation of oral-verbal stimuli and reply in
terms of oral-verbal responses. This method can be used through personal interviews and, if
possible, through telephone interviews.
(a) Personal interviews: Personal interview method requires a person known as the interviewer
asking questions generally in a face-to-face contact to the other person or persons. This sort of
interview may be in the form of direct personal investigation or it may be indirect oral
investigation. In the case of direct personal investigation the interviewer has to collect the
information personally from the sources concerned. He has to be on the spot and has to meet
people from whom data have to be collected. This method is particularly suitable for intensive
investigations. But in certain cases it may not be possible or worthwhile to contact directly the
persons concerned or on account of the extensive scope of enquiry. In such cases an indirect
oral interview can be conducted under which the interviewer has to cross-examine other
persons who are supposed to have knowledge about the problem under investigation and the
information. Most of the commissions and committees appointed by government to carry on
investigations make use of this method.
The method of collecting information through personal interviews is usually carried out in a
structured way. As such we call the interviews as structured interviews. Such interviews involve
the use of a set of predetermined questions and of highly standardized techniques of recording.
As against it, the unstructured interviews are characterized by a flexibility of approach to
questioning. Unstructured interviews do not follow a system of pre-determined questions and
standardized techniques of recording information. In a non-structured interview, the
interviewer is allowed much greater freedom to ask, in case of need, supplementary questions
or at times he may omit certain questions if the situation so requires. He may even change the
sequence of questions.
We may as well talk about focused interview, clinical interview and the non-directive interview.
Focused interview is meant to focus attention on the given experience of the respondent and its
effects. Under it the interviewer has the freedom to decide the manner and sequence in which
the questions would be asked and has also the freedom to explore reasons and motives. The
main task of the interviewer in case of a focused interview is to confine the respondent to a
discussion of issues with which he seeks conversance. Such interviews are used generally in the
development of hypotheses and constitute a major type of unstructured interviews. The clinical
interview is concerned with broad underlying feelings or motivations or with the course of
individual’s life experience. The method of eliciting information under it is generally left to the
interviewer’s discretion. In case of non-directive interview, the interviewer’s function is simply
to encourage the respondent to talk about the given topic with a bare minimum of direct
questioning. The interviewer often acts as a catalyst to a comprehensive expression of the
It is more flexible.
It is faster than other methods i.e., a quick way of obtaining information.
It is cheaper than personal interviewing method;
Recall is easy; callbacks are simple and economical.
There is a higher rate of response. Non-response rate is generally very low.
Replies can be recorded without causing embarrassment to respondents.
Interviewer can explain requirements more easily.
At times, access can be gained to respondents who otherwise cannot be contacted
for one reason or the other.
No field staff is required.
Representative and wider distribution of sample is possible.
But this system of collecting information is not free from demerits. Some of these may be
highlighted.
Little time is given to respondents for considered answers; interview period is not likely
to exceed five minutes in most cases.
Surveys are restricted to respondents who have telephone facilities.
Extensive geographical coverage may get restricted by cost considerations.
It is not suitable for intensive surveys where comprehensive answers are required to
various questions.
Possibility of the bias of the interviewer is relatively more.
Questions have to be short and to the point;
Probes are difficult to handle.
iii. Questionnaire
A questionnaire consists of a number of questions printed or typed in a definite order on a form
or set of forms. This method of data collection is quite popular, particularly in case of big
enquiries. It is being adopted by private individuals, research workers, private and public
organizations and even by governments. In this method a questionnaire is sent to the persons
concerned with a request to answer the questions and return the questionnaire. The
questionnaire is mailed to respondents who are expected to read and understand the questions
and write down the reply in the space meant for the purpose in the questionnaire itself. The
respondents have to answer the questions on their own.
The method of collecting data by mailing the questionnaires to respondents is most extensively
employed in various economic and business surveys. The merits of this method are as follows:
iv. Schedules
This method of data collection is very much like the collection of data through questionnaire,
with little difference which lies in the fact that schedules (pro-forma containing a set of
questions) are being filled in by the enumerators who are specially appointed for the purpose.
These enumerators along with schedules, go to respondents, put to them the questions from
the pro-forma in the order the questions are listed and record the replies in the space meant
for the same in the pro-forma. In certain situations, schedules may be handed over to
respondents and enumerators may help them in recording their answers to various questions in
the said schedules. Enumerators explain the aims and objects of the investigation and also
remove the difficulties which any respondent may feel in understanding the implications of a
particular question or the definition or concept of difficult terms.
This method requires the selection of enumerators for filling up schedules or assisting
respondents to fill up schedules and as such enumerators should be very carefully selected. The
enumerators should be trained, intelligent and must possess the capacity of cross-examination
in order to find out the truth. Above all, they should be honest, sincere, hardworking and
should have patience and perseverance.
The important points of difference between a questionnaire and schedule are as follows:
• The questionnaire is generally sent through mail to informants. But, schedule is
generally filled out by the research worker or the enumerator, who can interpret
questions when necessary.
• To collect data through questionnaire is relatively cheap and economical since we
have to spend money only in preparing the questionnaire and in mailing the same to
2. Distributor or store audits: Distributor or store audits are performed by distributors as well
as manufactures through their salesmen at regular intervals. Distributors get the retail stores
audited through salesmen and use such information to estimate market size, market share,
seasonal purchasing pattern and so on. The data are obtained in such audits not by questioning
but by observation.
3. Pantry audits: Pantry audit technique is used to estimate consumption of the basket of
goods at the consumer level. In this type of audit, the investigator collects an inventory of
types, quantities and prices of commodities consumed. The usual objective in a pantry audit is
to find out what types of consumers buy certain products and certain brands, the assumption
being that the contents of the pantry accurately portray consumer’s preferences.
4. Consumer panels: An extension of the pantry audit approach on a regular basis is known as
‘consumer panel’, where a set of consumers are arranged to be interviewed repeatedly over a
period of time.
5. Use of mechanical devices: The use of mechanical devices has been widely made to collect
information by way of indirect means. Eye camera, Pupil metric camera, Psycho-galvanometer,
Motion picture camera and Audiometer are the principal devices so far developed and
commonly used by modern big business houses, mostly in the developed world for the purpose
of collecting the required information.
Research projects often begin with secondary data, which are gathered and recorded by
someone else prior to (and for purposes other than) the current project. Secondary data usually
are historical and already assembled. They require no access to respondents or subjects.
In addition, before collecting primary data, the researcher should locate and analyze relevant
secondary data. Thus, secondary data can be an essential component of a successful research
design. Secondary data can help in sample designs and in the details of primary research
methods. In some projects, research may be largely confined to the analysis of secondary data
because some routine problems may be addressed based only on secondary data. In addition,
given the huge explosion of secondary data sources available, sufficient data may be accessed
to solve a research problem.
Secondary data offer several advantages over primary data. The primary advantage of
secondary data is their availability. Obtaining secondary data is almost always faster and less
expensive than acquiring primary data. This is particularly true when researchers use electronic
retrieval to access data stored digitally instead of doing the fieldwork themselves. In many
situations, collecting secondary data is instantaneous.
Secondary data are essential in instances when data cannot be obtained using primary data
collection procedures. Secondary data are easily accessible. Some secondary data, such as
those provided by the National Censuses, are available on topics where it would not be feasible
for a firm to collect primary data. The major advantages of secondary data are:
1. Saves time: Secondary research saves time because it requires very little time to
collect the information which is already available in sources such as the internet and
other documents such as books.
2. It is cost effective: Secondary research is cost effective since it does not require a lot
of money to collect the data. There is no need to do research from scratch as the data
has already been collected and documented.
7. It gives insights into the primary research: Secondary research will also help in giving
a more comprehensive insight into what the primary research was all about.
10. Secondary data is already refined: The data collected during the Secondary research
is data that has already been refined and analyzed. It is data that is ready to be used.
Because secondary data have been collected for purposes other than the problem at hand,
their usefulness to the current problem may be limited in several important ways as follows:
3. Time lag issues: There are issues of delay and stale data when dealing with secondary
data and it may not apply to the current situation.
4. It may not be specific: The data collection using Secondary research methods may not
be specific to the subject under study which means additional research needs to be
done.
5. The information may be incomplete: The data collected when conducting Secondary
research will not always be sufficient or complete.
6. Quality of the researcher: Secondary research requires that the primary researcher
should have been very qualitative and that the data available is of high quality and can
be used in a proper and relevant manner.
7. The data is not relevant: The objectives, nature and methods used to collect the
secondary data may not be relevant to the present situation.
8. The data may be inappropriate: The data available during Secondary research can
always be inappropriate and this makes the process of conducting Secondary research
irrelevant.
9. Lack of control over the quality of the data: It is difficult to control the quality of the
data available during Secondary research as opposed to primary research where you do
most of the work.
10. The data is biased: The data available in secondary research is often biased owing to
the fact that the primary researcher was trying to satisfy his/her own data needs.
Likewise, secondary data may be measured in units that may not be appropriate for the current
problem. For example, income may be measured by individual, family, household or spending
unit and could be gross or net after taxes and deductions.
Secondary data may be classified as either internal or external. Internal data are those
generated within the organization for which the research is being conducted. This information
may be available in a ready to-use format, such as information routinely supplied by the
SECONDARY DATA
INTERNAL EXTERNAL
Computerized
Requires further databases
processing
Syndicated services
Most organizations routinely gather, record, and store internal data to help them solve future
problems. An organization’s accounting system can usually provide a wealth of information.
Routine documents such as sales invoices allow external financial reporting, which in turn can
be a source of data for further analysis. If the data are properly coded into a modular database
in the accounting system, the researcher may be able to conduct more detailed analysis using
the decision support system. Sales information can be broken down by account or by product
and region; information related to orders received, back orders, and unfilled orders can be
identified; sales can be forecast on the basis of past data. Other useful sources of internal data
include salespeople’s call reports, customer complaints, service records, warranty card returns,
and other records.
External data are generated or recorded by an entity other than the researcher’s organization.
The government, newspapers and journals, trade associations, and other organizations create
or produce information. Traditionally, this information has been in published form, perhaps
available from a public library, trade association, or government agency. Today, however,
computerized data archives and electronic data interchange make external data as accessible as
internal data.
i. Published External Secondary data: Sources of published external secondary data include
local authorities, regional and national governments, the EC, non-profit organizations (e.g.
Chambers of Commerce), trade associations and professional organizations, commercial
publishers, investment brokerage firms, and professional marketing research firms. In fact, such
a quantity of data is available that the researcher can be overwhelmed. Therefore, it is
important to classify published sources (see Figure 3.2).
Indexes
Statistical data
Published external sources may be broadly classified as general business data or government
data. General business sources comprise guides, directories, indexes and statistical data.
Government sources may be broadly categorized as census data and other publications. These
data types are discussed further with specific sources used as examples.
Government Sources are widely available and easily accessed online, and can provide insights
related to product shipments, trade activity, business formation, patents, pricing and economic
trends, among other topics. However, data is often not presented explicitly for the subject
researchers are interested in, so it can take some manipulation and cross-checking of the data
to get it as narrowly focused as the researcher would like. Their publications may be divided
into census data and other publications.
General Business Sources: Businesses publish a lot of information in the form of books,
periodicals, journals, newspapers, magazines, reports and trade literature. This information can
be located by using guides, directories and indexes. Sources are also available to identify
statistical data. Moreover, Company websites can be virtual goldmines of information. Public
companies will have investor relations sections full of annual reports, regulatory findings and
investor presentations that can provide insights into both the individual company’s
performance and that of the industry at large. Public and private companies’ websites will
typically provide detail around product offerings, industries served, geographic presence,
organizational structure, sales methods (distribution or direct), customer relationships and
innovations.
Computerized databases
Computerized databases may be classified as online, Internet or offline as shown in the Figure.
Online databases consist of a central data bank that is accessed with a computer (or dumb
An overview of the various syndicated sources used specially in marketing research is given in
the following table.
Type Characteristics Advantages Disadvantages Uses
Surveys Surveys conducted Most flexible way of Interviewer errors Market
at regular intervals obtaining data; respondent errors; segmentation,
information on advertising theme
underlying motives selection and
advertising
effectiveness
Managers basically do business research to understand how and why things happen. If the
manager needs to know only what happened, or how often things happened, quantitative
research methodologies would serve the purpose. But to understand the different meanings
that people place on their experiences often requires research techniques that delve more
deeply into people’s hidden interpretations, understandings, and motivations. Qualitative
research is designed to tell the researcher how (process) and why (meaning) things happen as
they do.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
Qualitative research is very widely applied in practice. There are many research firms that
specialize in qualitative research. Qualitative research aims to achieve an in-depth
understanding of a situation, i.e. phenomena relating to or involving quality or kind. For
instance, when a researcher is interested in investigating the reasons for human behavior (i.e.,
why people think or do certain things) the research needs to be conducted should of qualitative
in nature. As such, qualitative research is especially important in the behavioral sciences where
the aim is to discover the underlying motives of human behavior. Through such research we
can analyze the various factors which motivate people to behave in a particular manner or
which make people like or dislike a particular thing.
Qualitative research draws data from a variety of sources, including the following:
3. Qualitative research tools are aimed at discovering the primary themes indicating
human motivations and the documentation of activities.
4. Qualitative research produces many product and process improvement ideas.
Especially, it is of great use when the research objective is to learn how a phenomenon
occurs in its natural setting or to learn how to express some concept in colloquial terms.
For example, how do consumers actually use a product? Or, exactly how does the
accounting department process invoices?
5. Qualitative research is useful when the researcher is studying a behavior that is
particularly context dependent—meaning the reasons something is liked or some
behavior is performed depends very much on the particular situation surrounding the
event.
6. Qualitative tools can yield unique insights, many of which may lead the organization
in new directions. When a fresh approach to studying some problem is needed
quantitative research yields a satisfying result.
The following exhibit offers some examples of appropriate uses of qualitative research in
business.
Decision Arena Questions to Be Answered
Job Analysis • Does the current assignment of tasks generate the most productivity?
• Does the advancement through different job levels incorporate the
necessary training to foster the strongest performance?
Advertising Concept • What images should we use to connect with our target customers’
Development motivations?
Productivity • What actions could we take to boost worker productivity without
Enhancement generating worker discontent?
New Product • What would our current market think of a proposed product idea?
Development • We need new products, but what should they be to take advantage of
our existing customer-perceived strengths?
• Which products will create the greatest synergy with our existing
products in terms of ROI and distribution partner growth?
Benefits • Should our compensation plan be more flexible and customizable?
Management •How do employees perceive wellness-prevention programs as
compared to corrective health programs in terms of value?
We can classify the qualitative research techniques as either direct or indirect, based on
whether the true purpose of the project is known to the respondents. In Direct approach the
purposes of the project are disclosed to the respondent or otherwise obvious to them from the
questions asked. Focus groups and in-depth interviews are the major direct techniques. Even
though the purpose of the project is disclosed, the extent to which the purpose of the research
is revealed at the start of a focus group or in-depth group may vary.
In contrast, research that takes an indirect approach makes the purpose of the project totally
unrecognizable to the respondent. In an indirect approach, the researcher wants respondents
to behave as naturally as possible without any impediment of research purposes. In observation
or ethnographic techniques, consumers may be seen shopping, choosing products, using
products, interacting with other people and objects, hopefully in a natural environment and a
natural manner. The ‘respondent’ may not know that they are being observed, or if they do and
have agreed to be observed, may not really know why. The purpose of using projective
techniques is to discover underlying motivations, beliefs, attitudes or feelings regarding
consumer behavior. The techniques allow indirect questioning to allow respondents to discover
novel ways to think about and express their feelings, where direct questioning would fail.
The following figure presents a useful way to remember which qualitative techniques tend
towards directness and indirectness.
Direct Indirect
Key benefit Group members ‘feed’ off each other and creatively reveal ideas that the
researcher may not have thought of or dared to tackle
Key drawback Group members may feel intimidated or shy and may not reveal anything
Group size 6 to 12
Group composition Homogeneous, respondents pre-screened
Physical setting Relaxed, informal atmosphere
Time duration 1.5 to 6 hours
Recording Use of audiocassettes, videotapes and notes from observations
Moderator Observational, interpersonal and communication skills
1 Synergy: Putting a group of people together will produce a wider range of information, insight
and ideas than will individual responses secured privately.
2 Scrutiny: A focus group interview allows closer scrutiny in several ways. First, the session can
be observed by several people, as it is usually conducted in a room containing a two-way
mirror. The respondents and moderator are on one side, and an invited audience that may
2 Moderation: As well as being great fun to moderate, focus groups can be difficult to
moderate. Much depends upon the ‘chemistry’ of the group in terms of how group members
get on with each other and draw ideas and explanations from each other. Even moderators
with many years of experience can get into difficulty with particular group members who
disrupt the discussion. The quality of the results depends upon how well the discussion is
managed and ultimately on the skills of the moderator.
The Moderator
The moderator essentially runs the focus group and plays a critical role in its success. There are
several qualities that a good moderator must possess:
1. The moderator must be permissive, allowing the flow of discussion to develop as the group
sees fit. S/he should be someone who is really interested in people, who listens carefully to
what others have to say, and who can readily establish rapport, gain people’s confidence, and
make them feel relaxed and eager to talk.
2. The moderator must be a good listener. Without good listening skills, the moderator may
direct the group in an unproductive direction.
3. The moderator must try not to interject his or her own opinions. Good moderators usually
say less rather than more. They can stimulate productive discussion with generalized follow-ups
such as, “Tell us more about that incident,” or “How are your experiences similar or different
from the one you just heard?” The moderator must be particularly careful not to ask leading
questions such as “You are happy to work at Acme, aren’t you?”
4. The moderator must be able to control discussion without being overbearing. The
moderator’s role is also to focus the discussion on the areas of concern. When a topic is no
longer generating fresh ideas, the effective moderator changes the flow of discussion.
5. The moderator must encourage unresponsive members to participate.
6. The moderator must be sensitive enough to guide the group discussion at an intellectual as
well as emotional level. He or she must also be adjusted to mood changes and issues that fire
up enthusiastic responses or conversely cause the discussion to dry up.
A depth interview may take from 30 minutes to over an hour. It may occur on a one-off basis or
it may unfold over a number of meetings between an interviewer and a respondent. Once the
interviewer has gained access to a potential respondent, the interviewer should begin by
explaining the purpose of the interview, showing what the respondent will get out of taking
part in the interview and explaining what the process will be like.
Depth interviews provide more insight into a particular individual than do focus groups. Depth
interviews are particularly advantageous when some unique or unusual behavior is being
studied. For instance, depth interviews have been usefully applied to reveal characteristics of
adolescent behavior, ranging from the ways they get what they want from their parents to
shopping, smoking, and shoplifting.
Laddering is a term used for a particular approach to probing, asking respondents to compare
differences between brands at different levels. What usually results is that the first distinctions
are attribute-level distinctions, the second are benefit-level distinctions, and the third are at the
value or motivation level. Probing is of critical importance in obtaining meaningful responses
and uncovering hidden issues. Probing can be done by asking general questions such as ‘Why
do you say that?’, ‘That’s interesting, can you tell me more?’ or ‘Would you like to add anything
else?’
Advantages of depth interviews
Depth interviews have the following advantages. They can:
1 Uncover greater depth of insights than focus groups. This can happen through concentrating
and developing an issue with the individual.
2 Attribute the responses directly to the respondent, unlike focus groups where it is often
difficult to determine which respondent made a particular response.
3 Result in a free exchange of information that may not be possible in focus groups because
there is no social pressure to conform to group response. This makes them ideally suited to
sensitive issues, especially commercially sensitive issues.
Observation
Observation can be a very important qualitative tool. The participant-observer approach
typifies how observation can be used to explore various issues. Meaning is extracted from field
notes. Field notes are the researchers’ descriptions of what actually happens in the field. These
notes then become the text from which meaning is extracted.
Observation may also take place in visual form. Researchers may observe employees in their
workplace, consumers in their home, or try to gain knowledge from photographic records of
one type or another. Observation can either be very inexpensive, such as when a research
associate sits and simply observes behavior, or it can be very expensive, as in most participant-
observer studies. Observational research is keenly advantageous for gaining insight into things
that respondents cannot or will not verbalize.
Observation includes the full range of monitoring behavioral and non-behavioral activities and
conditions, which can be classified roughly as follows:
Non-behavioral Observation
A prevalent form of observation research is record analysis. This may involve historical or
current records and public or private records. They may be written, printed, sound-recorded,
photographed, or videotaped. Historical statistical data are often the only sources used for a
study. Analysis of current financial records and economic data also provides a major data
source for studies. Physical condition analysis is typified by store audits of merchandise
availability, studies of plant safety compliance, analysis of inventory conditions, and analysis of
financial statements. Process or activity analysis includes time/motion studies of
manufacturing processes and analysis of traffic flows in a distribution system, paperwork flows
in an office, and financial flows in the banking system.
Behavioral Observation
The observational study of persons can be classified into four major categories. Nonverbal
behavior is the most prevalent of these and includes body movement, motor expressions, and
even exchanged glances. At the level of gross body movement, one might study how a
salesperson travels a territory. At a fine level, one can study the body movements of a worker
assembling a product or time-sample the activity of a department’s workforce to discover the
share of time each worker spends in various ways. More abstractly, one can study body
Linguistic behavior is a second frequently used form of behavior observation. One simple type
familiar to most students is the tally of “ahs” or other annoying sounds or words a professor
makes or uses during a class. More serious applications are the study of a sales presentation’s
content or the study of what, how, and how much information is conveyed in a training
situation.
Behavior also may be analyzed on an extra-linguistic level. Sometimes extra-linguistic behavior
is as important a means of communication as linguistic behavior. One author has suggested
there are four dimensions of extra-linguistic activity. They are (1) vocal, including pitch,
loudness, and timbre; (2) temporal, including the rate of speaking, duration of utterance, and
rhythm; (3) interaction, including the tendencies to interrupt, dominate, or inhibit; and (4)
verbal stylistic, including vocabulary and pronunciation peculiarities, dialect, and characteristic
expressions. These dimensions could add substantial insight to the linguistic content of the
interactions between supervisors and subordinates or salespeople and customers.
A fourth type of behavior study involves spatial relationships, especially how a person relates
physically to others. One form of this study, proxemics, concerns how people organize the
territory about them and how they maintain discrete distances between themselves and
others. A study of how salespeople physically approach customers and a study of the effects of
crowding in a workplace are examples of this type of observation.
Projective Techniques
A projective technique is an unstructured, indirect form of questioning that encourages
respondents to project their underlying motivations, beliefs, attitudes or feelings regarding the
issues of concern. In projective techniques, respondents are asked to interpret the behavior of
others rather than to describe their own behavior. In interpreting the behavior of others, it is
contended that respondents indirectly project their own motivations, beliefs, attitudes or
feelings into the situation. Thus, the respondent’s attitudes are uncovered by analyzing their
responses to scenarios that are deliberately unstructured, vague and ambiguous. The more
ambiguous the situation, the more respondents project their emotions, needs, motives,
attitudes and values, as demonstrated by work in clinical psychology on which projective
techniques are based. As in psychology, these techniques are classified as association,
completion, construction and expressive. Each of these classifications is discussed below.
Association techniques
In association techniques, an individual is presented with a stimulus and asked to
respond with the first thing that comes to mind. Word association is the best known of
these techniques. In word association, respondents are presented with a list of words
such as location, speed, error, quality, price etc one at a time, and are asked to respond
Completion techniques
In completion techniques, respondents are asked to complete an incomplete stimulus
situation. Common completion techniques in marketing research are sentence
completion and story completion.
Sentence completion is similar to word association. Respondents are given incomplete
sentences and are asked to complete them. Generally, they are asked to use the first
word or phrase that comes to mind. One advantage of sentence completion over word
association is that, respondents can be provided with a more directed stimulus.
Sentence completion may provide more information about the subjects’ feelings than
word association. Sentence completion is not as disguised as word association,
however, and many respondents may be able to guess the purpose of the study. A
variation of sentence completion is paragraph completion, in which the respondent
completes a paragraph beginning with the stimulus phrase. A further expanded version
of sentence completion and paragraph completion is story completion. In story
completion, respondents are given part of a story, enough to direct attention to a
particular topic but not to hint at the ending. They are required to give the conclusion in
their own words.
Construction techniques
Construction techniques are closely related to completion techniques. Construction
techniques require the respondents to construct a response in the form of a story,
dialogue or description. In a construction technique, the researcher provides less initial
structure to the respondents than in a completion technique. The two main
construction techniques are picture response techniques and cartoon tests.
Expressive Techniques
In expressive techniques, respondents are presented with a verbal or visual situation
and asked to relate the feelings and attitudes of other people to the situation. The
respondents express not their own feelings or attitudes, but those of others. The two
main expressive techniques are role playing and third-person technique. In role playing,
respondents are asked to play the role or to assume the behavior of someone else. The
researcher assumes that the respondents will project their own feelings into the role. A
major use of role playing is in uncovering the nature of a brand personality. The
following example shows why the brand personality is of importance to the marketer
and how an understanding of personality may be used in advertising. In the third-
person technique, respondents are presented with a verbal or visual situation and are
asked to relate the beliefs and attitudes of a third person rather than directly expressing
personal beliefs and attitudes. This third person may be a friend, a neighbor, a
colleague, or any person that the researcher chooses. Again, the researcher assumes
that the respondents will reveal personal beliefs and attitudes while describing the
reactions of a third party. Asking an individual to respond in the third person reduces
the social pressure to give an acceptable answer.
With such skill requirements, the disadvantage of the technique lies in the nature of the
respondents who agree to participate, and how characteristic they are of distinct target
markets.
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Managers basically do business research to understand how and why things happen. If the
manager needs to know only what happened, or how often things happened, quantitative
research methodologies would serve the purpose. Quantitative research is the systematic
empirical investigation of observable phenomena via statistical, mathematical, or
computational techniques. The objective of quantitative research is to develop and employ
mathematical models, theories, and hypotheses pertaining to phenomena. The process of
measurement is central to quantitative research because it provides the fundamental
connection between empirical observation and mathematical expression of quantitative
relationships.
Quantitative data is any data that is in numerical form. It can range from simple counts such as
the frequency of occurrences to more complex data such as test scores, prices or rental costs.
To be useful these data need to be analyzed and interpreted. The researcher analyses the data
with the help of quantitative techniques by establishing statistical relationships between
variables to get an unbiased result that can be generalized to some larger population.
Until the advent of powerful personal computers, data were analyzed either by hand or by
using mainframe computers. The former of these was extremely time consuming and prone to
error, the latter expensive. Fortunately, the by-hand or calculator ‘number-crunching’ and
‘charting’ elements of quantitative analysis have been incorporated into relatively inexpensive
10. Improper representation of the target population might hinder the researcher for
achieving its desired aims and objectives. Despite of applying appropriate sampling plan
representation of the subjects is dependent on the probability distribution of observed
data. This may led to miscalculation of probability distribution and lead to falsity in
proposition.
Research Purpose •In-depth understanding; theory • Describe or predict; build and test theory
building
Research Sponsor • May participate by observing • Rarely has either direct or indirect
Involvement research in real time or via taped contact with participant
interviews
Feedback • Smaller sample sizes make data • Larger sample sizes lengthen data
Turnaround collection faster for shorter possible collection; Internet methodologies are
turnaround shortening turnaround but inappropriate
• Insights are developed as the for many studies
research progresses, shortening data • Insight development follows data
analysis collection and entry, lengthening research
process; interviewing software permits
some tallying of responses as data
collection progresses
Data Security • More absolute given use of • Act of research in progress is often
restricted access known by competitors; insights may be
facilities and smaller sample sizes gleaned by competitors for some visible,
field-based studies
N.B: this lecture sheet has been prepared by using the following books:
1. Malhotra, N. K., Birks, D. F., & Wills, P. (2012). Marketing research: An applied approach. Harlow,
England: Pearson.
2. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
3. Zikmund G.W., B. J. (2013). Business Research Method A South Asian Perspective (8th ed.) Delhi:
Cengage Learning India Pvt. Ltd.
4. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students. Harlow:
Financial Times Prentice Hall.