tt005 Blade Inc Case 1

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Blade Inc Case :Decision to Expand Internationally

Blades, Inc., is a U.S.-based company that has been incorporated in the United States for 3 years.
Blades is a relatively small company, with total assets of only $200 million. The company
produces a single type of product, roller blades. Due to the booming roller blade market in the
United States at the time of the company’s establishment, Blades has been quite successful. For
example, in its first year of operation, it reported a net income of $3.5 million. Recently,
however, the demand for Blades’ “Speedos,” the company’s primary product in the United
States, has been slowly tapering off, and Blades has not been performing well. Last year, it
reported a return on assets of only 7 percent. In response to the company’s annual report for its
most recent year of operations, Blades’ shareholders have been pressuring the company to
improve its performance; its stock price has fallen from a high of $20 per share 3 years ago to
$12 last year. Blades produces high-quality roller blades and employs a unique production
process, but the prices it charges are among the top 5 percent in the industry. In light of these
circumstances, Ben Holt, the company’s chief financial officer (CFO), is contemplating his
alternatives for Blades’ future. There are no other cost-cutting measures that Blades can
implement in the United States without affecting the quality of its product. Also, production of
alternative products would require major modifications to the existing plant setup. Furthermore,
and because of these limitations, expansion within the United States at this time seems pointless.
Holt is considering the following: If Blades cannot penetrate the U.S. market further or reduce
costs here, why not import some parts from overseas and/or expand the company’s sales to
foreign countries? Similar strategies have proved successful for numerous companies that
expanded into Asia in recent years to increase their profit margins. The CFO’s initial focus is on
Thailand. Thailand has recently experienced weak economic conditions, and Blades could
purchase components there at a low cost. Holt is aware that many of Blades’ competitors have
begun importing production components from Thailand. Not only would Blades be able to
reduce costs by importing rubber and/or plastic from Thailand due to the low costs of these
inputs, but it might also be able to augment weak U.S. sales by exporting to Thailand, an
economy still in its infancy and just beginning to appreciate leisure products such as roller
blades. While several of Blades’ competitors import components from Thailand, few are
exporting to the country. Long-term decisions would also eventually have to be made; maybe
Blades, Inc., could establish a subsidiary in Thailand and gradually shift its focus away from the
United States if its U.S. sales do not rebound. Establishing a subsidiary in Thailand would also
make sense for Blades due to its superior production process. Holt is reasonably sure that Thai
firms could not duplicate the high-quality production process employed by Blades. Furthermore,
if the company’s initial approach of exporting works well, establishing a subsidiary in Thailand
would preserve Blades’ sales before Thai competitors are able to penetrate the Thai market. As a
financial analyst for Blades, Inc., you are assigned to analyze international opportunities and risk
resulting from international business. Your initial assessment should focus on the barriers and
opportunities that international trade may offer. Holt has never been involved in international
business in any form and is unfamiliar with any constraints that may inhibit his plan to export to
and import from a foreign country. Holt has presented you with a list of initial questions you
should answer.

ANSWER FROM SOLUTION MANUAL (USE AS A GUIDE DON’T COPY DIRECTLY)

1. What are the advantages Blades could gain from importing from and/or exporting to a
foreign country such as Thailand?

ANSWER: The advantages Blades, Inc. could gain from importing from Thailand include
potentially lowering Blades’ cost of goods sold. If the inputs (rubber and plastic) are cheaper
when imported from a foreign country such as Thailand, this would increase Blades’ net
income. Since numerous competitors of Blades are already importing components from
Thailand, importing would increase Blades’ competitiveness in the U.S., especially since its
prices are among the highest in the roller blade industry. Furthermore, since Blades is
considering longer range plans in Thailand, importing from and exporting to Thailand may
present it with an opportunity to establish initial relationships with some Thai suppliers. As
far as exporting is concerned, Blades, Inc. could be one of the first firms to sell roller blades
in Thailand. Considering that Blades is contemplating to eventually shift its sales to
Thailand, this could be a major competitive advantage

2. What are some of the disadvantages Blades could face as a result of foreign trade in the
short run? In the long run?
ANSWER: There are several potential disadvantages Blades, Inc. should consider. First of
all, Blades would be exposed to currency fluctuations in the Thai baht. For example, the
dollar cost of imported inputs may become more expensive over time if the baht appreciates
even if Thai suppliers do not adjust their prices. However, Blades’ sales in Thailand would
also increase in dollar terms if the baht appreciates, even if Blades does not increase its
prices. Blades, Inc. would also be exposed to the economic conditions in Thailand. For
example, if there is a recession, Blades would suffer from decreased sales to Thailand.

In the long run, Blades should be aware of any regulatory and environmental constraints
the Thai government may impose on it (such as pollution controls). Furthermore, the
company should be aware of the political risk involved in operating in Thailand. For
example, the likelihood of expropriation by the Thai government should be assessed. Another
important issue involved in Blades’ long-run plans is how the foreign subsidiary would be
monitored. Geographical distance may make monitoring very difficult. This is an especially
important point since Thai managers may conform to goals other than the maximization of
shareholder wealth.

You might also like