RF Exposure Info 4423884

PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
18855 Adams Ct, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 USA

Tel. +1.410.290.6652 / Fax +1.410.290.6654
http://www.pctest.com
SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Applicant Name: Date of Testing:

Apple, Inc. 05/20/19-06/04/19
One Apple Park Way, Test Site/Location:
Cupertino, CA 95014 PCTEST Lab, Morgan Hill, CA, USA
Document Serial No.:
1C1901280002-01-R1.BCG
F CC ID: BCG A2197
AP PL IC ANT : APPL E, INC.
DUT Type: Tablet Device

Application Type: Certification
FCC Rule Part(s): CFR §2.1093
Model: A2197
SAR
Equipment
Band & Mode Tx Frequency
Class
1g Body (W/kg)
DTS 2.4 GHz WLAN 2412 - 2472 MHz 0.96

NII U-NII-1 5180 - 5240 MHz N/A
NII U-NII-2A 5260 - 5320 MHz 1.05
NII U-NII-2C 5500 - 5720 MHz 1.14
NII U-NII-3 5745 - 5825 MHz 0.99
DSS/DTS Bluetooth 2402 - 2480 MHz 1.08
Simultaneous SAR per KDB 690783 D01v01r03: 1.35
Note: This revised Test Report (S/N: 1C1901280002-01-R1.BCG) supersedes and replaces the previously issued test report on the same
subject device for the same type of testing as indicated. Please discard or destroy the previously issued test report(s) and dispose of it
accordingly.
This wireless portable device has been shown to be capable of compliance for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) for unc ontrolled
environment/general population exposure limits specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and has been tested in accordance with the measurement
procedures specified in Section 1.7 of this report; for North American frequency bands only.
I attest to the accuracy of data. All measurements reported herein were performed by me or were made under my supervision and are correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief. I assume full responsibility for the completeness of these measurements and vouch for the
qualifications of all persons taking them. Test results reported herein relate only to the item(s) tested.
The SAR Tick is an initiative of the Mobile & Wireless Forum (MWF). While a product may be considered eligible, use of the SAR Tick logo requires an agreement with the MWF. Further
details can be obtained by emailing: [email protected].
Approved by:
FCC ID: BCGA2197 SAR EVALUATION REPORT
Quality Manager
Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

Page 1 of 40
1C1901280002-01-R1.BCG 05/20/19 – 06/04/19 Tablet Device
© 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. REV 21.3 M
02/15/2019
© 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any part, form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc. If you have any questions about this international copyright or have an e nquiry about obtaining
additional rights to this report or assembly of contents thereof, please contact [email protected].
T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S
1 DEVICE UNDER TEST ........................................................................................................................... 3
2 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................... 8
3 DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................. 9
4 TEST CONFIGURATION POSITIONS .................................................................................................. 10
5 RF EXPOSURE LIMITS ........................................................................................................................ 11
6 FCC MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES................................................................................................. 12
7 RF CONDUCTED POWERS ................................................................................................................. 15
8 SYSTEM VERIFICATION ...................................................................................................................... 26
9 SAR DATA SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 28
10 FCC MULTI-TX AND ANTENNA SAR CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................... 32
11 SAR MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY .................................................................................................... 35
12 EQUIPMENT LIST ................................................................................................................................ 36
13 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES ..................................................................................................... 37
14 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................................... 38
15 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................... 39
APPENDIX A: SAR TEST PLOTS

APPENDIX B: SAR DIPOLE VERIFICATION PLOTS
APPENDIX C: PROBE AND DIPOLE CALIBRATION CERTIFICATES
APPENDIX D: SAR TISSUE SPECIFICATIONS
APPENDIX E: SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION
APPENDIX F: DUT ANTENNA DIAGRAM & SAR TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 2 of 40
02/15/2019
1 DEVICE UNDER T EST
1.1 Device Overview
Band & Mode Operating Modes Tx Frequency
2.4 GHz WLAN Voice/Data 2412 - 2472 MHz

U-NII-1 Voice/Data 5180 - 5240 MHz
U-NII-2A Voice/Data 5260 - 5320 MHz
U-NII-2C Voice/Data 5500 - 5720 MHz
U-NII-3 Voice/Data 5745 - 5825 MHz
Bluetooth Data 2402 - 2480 MHz
1.2 Power Reduction for SAR

This device utilizes an independent single step power reduction mechanism for Bluetooth operations. When
Bluetooth is operating simultaneously with 5 GHz WLAN, the output power of Bluetooth is reduced for the
duration of simultaneous operation. SAR evaluation was additionally performed at the maximum allowed output
power for Bluetooth which is applicable for all other use cases.
Detailed description of the mechanism and the verification procedures are included in the operational description
document. Section 7.4 contain a summary of the verification results.
1.3 Nominal and Maximum Output Power Specifications

This device operates using the following maximum and nominal output power specifications. SAR values were
scaled to the maximum allowed power to determine compliance per KDB Publication 447498 D01v06.
1.3.1 Maximum Output Power
Modulated Average - Single Tx Chain

Mode / Band
(dBm) - Antenna A
Channel 1 2 - 10 11 12 13
IEEE 802.11b (2.4 GHz) Maximum 16.0 14.5
IEEE 802.11g (2.4 GHz) Maximum 15.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 2.0
IEEE 802.11n (2.4 GHz) Maximum 15.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 2.0
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 3 of 40
02/15/2019
Mode / Band
(dBm) - Antenna B
Channel 1 2 - 10 11 12 13
IEEE 802.11b (2.4 GHz) Maximum 16.0 14.5
IEEE 802.11g (2.4 GHz) Maximum 15.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 2.0
IEEE 802.11n (2.4 GHz) Maximum 15.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 2.0
Modulated Average - MIMO

Mode / Band (dBm)
20 MHz Bandwidth
Channel 1 2 - 10 11 12 13
Ant: A 13.5 16.0 13.0 10.5 0.5
IEEE 802.11g/n (2.4 GHz) Maximum
Ant: B 13.5 16.0 13.0 10.5 0.5
Note: In MIMO operations, each antenna transmits at maximum allowed powers as indicated above.

Mode/Band
(dBm) - Antenna A
Bluetooth BDR Maximum 17.0

Bluetooth EDR Maximum 14.5
Bluetooth LE Maximum 17.0

Mode / Band (dBm) - Antenna A
20 MHz Bandwidth 40 MHz Bandwidth 80 MHz Bandwidth
Channel 36 40-48 52-60 64 100 104-136 140 144 149-165 38 46 54 62 102 110-126 134 142 151-159 42-58 106 122 138 155
IEEE 802.11a (5 GHz) Maximum 16.00 16.50 17.00 16.00 15.00 17.50 15.00 17.50 16.25 1.0
IEEE 802.11n (5 GHz) Maximum 16.00 16.50 17.00 16.00 15.00 17.50 15.00 17.50 16.25 13.50 16.50 17.00 15.00 14.00 17.50 16.00 17.50 16.25
IEEE 802.11ac (5 GHz) Maximum 16.00 16.50 17.00 16.00 15.00 17.50 15.00 17.50 16.25 13.50 16.50 17.00 15.00 14.00 17.50 16.00 17.50 16.25 13.00 14.00 17.00 17.50 16.25

Mode / Band (dBm) - Antenna B
Channel 36 40-48 52-60 64 100 104-136 140 144 149-165 38 46 54 62 102 110-126 134 142 151-159 42-58 106 122 138 155
IEEE 802.11a (5 GHz) Maximum 16.00 16.25 16.75 16.00 15.00 17.25 15.00 17.25 16.50
IEEE 802.11n (5 GHz) Maximum 16.00 16.25 16.75 16.00 15.00 17.25 15.00 17.25 16.50 13.50 16.25 16.75 15.00 14.00 17.25 16.00 17.25 16.50
IEEE 802.11ac (5 GHz) Maximum 16.00 16.25 16.75 16.00 15.00 17.25 15.00 17.25 16.50 13.50 16.25 16.75 15.00 14.00 17.25 16.00 17.25 16.50 13.00 14.00 17.00 17.25 16.50
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 4 of 40
02/15/2019
Mode / Band (dBm) 2Tx CDD
Channel 36 40-48 52-60 64 100 104-136 140 144 149-165 38 46 54 62 102 110-126 134 142 151-159 42-58 106 122 138 155
Ant: A 15.00 16.50 16.50 14.50 14.50 15.50 14.00 15.50 16.25
IEEE 802.11a (5 GHz) Maximum
Ant: B 15.00 16.25 16.50 14.50 14.50 15.50 14.00 15.50 16.50
Ant: A 15.00 16.50 16.50 14.50 14.50 15.50 14.00 15.50 16.25 12.50 16.50 17.00 13.50 13.00 17.50 15.00 17.50 16.25
IEEE 802.11n (5 GHz) Maximum
Ant: B 15.00 16.25 16.50 14.50 14.50 15.50 14.00 15.50 16.50 12.50 16.25 16.75 13.50 13.00 17.25 15.00 17.25 16.50
Ant: A 15.00 16.50 16.50 14.50 14.50 15.50 14.00 15.50 16.25 12.50 16.50 17.00 13.50 13.00 17.50 15.00 17.50 16.25 12.00 12.50 17.00 17.50 16.00
IEEE 802.11ac (5 GHz) Maximum
Ant: B 15.00 16.25 16.50 14.50 14.50 15.50 14.00 15.50 16.50 12.50 16.25 16.75 13.50 13.00 17.25 15.00 17.25 16.50 12.00 12.50 17.00 17.25 16.00
Note: In MIMO operations, each antenna transmits at maximum allowed powers as indicated above.

Mode / Band (dBm) 2Tx SDM

Channel 36 40-48 52-60 64 100 104-136 140 144 149-165 38 46 54 62 102 110-126 134 142 151-159 42-58 106 122 138 155
Ant: A 15.00 16.50 17.00 14.50 14.50 17.50 14.00 17.50 16.25 12.50 16.50 17.00 13.50 13.00 17.50 15.00 17.50 16.25
IEEE 802.11n (5 GHz) Maximum
Ant: B 15.00 16.25 16.75 14.50 14.50 17.25 14.00 17.25 16.50 12.50 16.25 16.75 13.50 13.00 17.25 15.00 17.25 16.50
Ant: A 15.00 16.50 17.00 14.50 14.50 17.50 14.00 17.50 16.25 12.50 16.50 17.00 13.50 13.00 17.50 15.00 17.50 16.25 12.00 12.50 17.00 17.50 16.00
IEEE 802.11ac (5 GHz) Maximum
Ant: B 15.00 16.25 16.75 14.50 14.50 17.25 14.00 17.25 16.50 12.50 16.25 16.75 13.50 13.00 17.25 15.00 17.25 16.50 12.00 12.50 17.00 17.25 16.00
Note: In MIMO operations, each antenna transmits at maximum allowed powers as indicated above
1.3.2 Reduced Output Power

Modulated Average - Single Tx Chain (dBm) -
Mode/Band
Antenna A
Bluetooth BDR Maximum 10.0
Bluetooth EDR Maximum 10.0
Bluetooth LE Maximum 10.0
Note: Bluetooth operations on Antenna A are reduced in output power when it is operating simultaneously with 5
GHz WLAN. Detailed description of the power reduction mechanism is included in the operational description.
1.4 DUT Antenna Locations

The overall dimensions of this device is > 200 mm. A diagram showing the location of the device antennas can be
found in Appendix F. Exact antenna dimensions and separation distances are shown in the Technical
Descriptions in the FCC filings.
Table 1-1
Device Edges/Sides for SAR Testing
Mode Back Top Bottom Right Left
2.4 GHz WLAN Ant A Yes No Yes No Yes
2.4 GHz WLAN Ant B Yes No Yes Yes No
5 GHz WLAN Ant A Yes No Yes No Yes
5 Ghz WLAN Ant B Yes No Yes Yes No
Bluetooth Ant A Yes No Yes No Yes
Note: Per FCC KDB Publication 616217 D04v01r01, particular edges were not required to be evaluated for SAR
Based on the SAR exclusion threshold in KDB 447498 D01V06. Additional edges may have been evaluated for
simultaneous transmission analysis.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 5 of 40
02/15/2019
1.5 Simultaneous Transmission Capabilities
According to FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06, transmitters are considered to be operating simultaneously
when there is overlapping transmission, with the exception of transmissions during network hand-offs with
maximum hand-off duration less than 30 seconds.
This device contains multiple transmitters that may operate simultaneously, and therefore requires a simultaneous
transmission analysis according to FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 4.3.2 procedures.
Table 1-2
Simultaneous Transmission Scenarios
1. 2.4 GHz WLAN and 2.4 GHz Bluetooth cannot transmit simultaneously.
2. 2.4 GHz WLAN and 5 GHz WLAN cannot transmit simultaneously.
3. This device supports 2x2 MIMO Tx for WLAN. 802.11a/g/n/ac supports CDD and 802.11 n/ac additionally
supports SDM. Each WLAN antenna can transmit independently or together when operating with MIMO.
4. This device supports VoWIFI.
1.6 Miscellaneous SAR Test Considerations

(A) WIFI/BT
The WLAN/Bluetooth chipset in this device is produced by two different suppliers. The electrically identical
modules are manufactured with the identical mechanical structure to meet the same specifications and
functions. Two device variants are referenced as Variant 1 and Variant 2 in this report. WLAN/Bluetooth SAR
worst case configuration was spotchecked on Variant 1 and Variant 2. The Variant with the highest reported
SAR value was evaluated for the remaining WLAN/Bluetooth configurations.
Based on the maximum allowed power for the respective antennas, U-NII-2A was evaluated for Antenna A
and Antenna B SAR. Additional testing for U-NII-1 Antenna A and Antenna B were not required since all
reported SAR was less than 1.2 W/kg per FCC KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02.
This device supports channel 1-13 for 2.4 GHz WLAN. However, since channels 12 and 13 have equal or less
maximum output power, channels 1, 6, and 11 were considered for SAR testing per KDB 248227 D01v02r02.
This device supports IEEE 802.11ac with the following features:

a) Up to 80 MHz Bandwidth only
b) No aggregate channel configurations
c) 2 Tx antenna output
d) 256 QAM is supported
e) TDWR and Band gap channels are supported
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 6 of 40
02/15/2019
1.7 Guidance Applied
• FCC KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 (SAR Considerations for 802.11 Devices)
• FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 (General SAR Guidance)
• FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, D02v01r02 (SAR Measurements up to 6 GHz)
• FCC KDB Publication 616217 D04v01r02 (Tablet)
1.8 Device Serial Numbers

Several samples with identical hardware were used to support SAR testing. The manufacturer has confirmed that
the device(s) tested have the same physical, mechanical and thermal characteristics and are within operational
tolerances expected for production units. The serial numbers used for each test are indicated alongside the
results in Section 9.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 7 of 40
02/15/2019
2 INT RODUCT ION
The FCC and Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada have adopted the guidelines for
evaluating the environmental effects of radio frequency (RF) radiation in ET Docket 93-62 on Aug. 6, 1996 and
Health Canada Safety Code 6 to protect the public and workers from the potential hazards of RF emissions due to
FCC-regulated portable devices. [1]
The safety limits used for the environmental evaluation measurements are based on the criteria published by the
American National Standards Institute (ANSI) for localized specific absorption rate (SAR) in IEEE/ANSI C95.1-
1992 Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3
kHz to 300 GHz [3] and Health Canada RF Exposure Guidelines Safety Code 6 [22]. The measurement
procedure described in IEEE/ANSI C95.3-2002 Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially
Hazardous Electromagnetic Fields - RF and Microwave [4] is used for guidance in measuring the Specific
Absorption Rate (SAR) due to the RF radiation exposure from the Equipment Under Test (EUT). These criteria for
SAR evaluation are similar to those recommended by the International Committee for Non-Ionizing Radiation
Protection (ICNIRP) in Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields,”
Report No. Vol 74. SAR is a measure of the rate of energy absorption due to exposure to an RF transmitting
source. SAR values have been related to threshold levels for potential biological hazards.
2.1 SAR Definition

Specific Absorption Rate is defined as the time derivative (rate) of the incremental energy (dU) absorbed by
(dissipated in) an incremental mass (dm) contained in a volume element (dV) of a given density (). It is also
defined as the rate of RF energy absorption per unit mass at a point in an absorbing body (see Equation 2-1).
Equation 2-1
SAR Mathematical Equation
d  dU  d  dU 
SAR =  =  
dt  dm  dt  dv 
SAR is expressed in units of Watts per Kilogram (W/kg).
  E2
SAR =

where:
 = conductivity of the tissue-simulating material (S/m)
 = mass density of the tissue-simulating material (kg/m3)
E = Total RMS electric field strength (V/m)
NOTE: The primary factors that control rate of energy absorption were found to be the wavelength of the incident field in relation to the
dimensions and geometry of the irradiated organism, the orientation of the organism in relation to the polarity of field vect ors, the presence of
reflecting surfaces, and whether conductive contact is made by the organism with a ground plane.[6]
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 8 of 40
02/15/2019
3 DOSIMET RIC ASSESSME NT
3.1 Measurement Procedure

The evaluation was performed using the following procedure compliant to
FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 and IEEE 1528-2013:
1. The SAR distribution at the exposed side of the head or body was
measured at a distance no greater than 5.0 mm from the inner surface of
the shell. The area covered the entire dimension of the device-head and
body interface and the horizontal grid resolution was determined per
FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 (See Table 3-1) and IEEE
1528-2013.
2. The point SAR measurement was taken at the maximum SAR region
determined from Step 1 to enable the monitoring of SAR
fluctuations/drifts during the 1g/10g cube evaluation. SAR at this fixed Figure 3-1 point
was measured and used as a reference value. Sample SAR Area
Scan
3. Based on the area scan data, the peak of the region with maximum SAR was
determined by spline interpolation. Around this point, a volume was assessed according to the measurement
resolution and volume size requirements of FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 (See Table 3-1) and
IEEE 1528-2013. On the basis of this data set, the spatial peak SAR value was evaluated with the following
procedure (see references or the DASY manual online for more details):
a. SAR values at the inner surface of the phantom are extrapolated from the measured values along the
line away from the surface with spacing no greater than that in Table 3-1. The extrapolation was based on
a least-squares algorithm. A polynomial of the fourth order was calculated through the points in the z-axis
(normal to the phantom shell).
b. After the maximum interpolated values were calculated between the points in the cube, the SAR was
averaged over the spatial volume (1g or 10g) using a 3D-Spline interpolation algorithm. The 3D-spline is
composed of three one-dimensional splines with the “Not a knot” condition (in x, y, and z directions). The
volume was then integrated with the trapezoidal algorithm. One thousand points (10 x 10 x 10) were
obtained through interpolation, in order to calculate the averaged SAR.
c. All neighboring volumes were evaluated until no neighboring volume with a higher average value was
found.
4. The SAR reference value, at the same location as step 2, was re-measured after the zoom scan was complete
to calculate the SAR drift. If the drift deviated by more than 5%, the SAR test and drift measurements were
repeated.
Table 3-1
Area and Zoom Scan Resolutions per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04*
Maximum Zoom Scan Spatial
Maximum Area Scan Maximum Zoom Scan Resolution (mm) Minimum Zoom Scan
Frequency Resolution (mm) Resolution (mm) Volume (mm)
(∆x area, ∆yarea) (∆x zoom, ∆yzoom) Uniform Grid Graded Grid (x,y,z)
∆zzoom(n) ∆zzoom(1)* ∆zzoom(n>1)*
≤ 2 GHz ≤ 15 ≤8 ≤5 ≤4 ≤ 1.5*∆zzoom(n-1) ≥ 30
2-3 GHz ≤ 12 ≤5 ≤5 ≤4 ≤ 1.5*∆zzoom(n-1) ≥ 30
3-4 GHz ≤ 12 ≤5 ≤4 ≤3 ≤ 1.5*∆zzoom(n-1) ≥ 28
4-5 GHz ≤ 10 ≤4 ≤3 ≤ 2.5 ≤ 1.5*∆zzoom(n-1) ≥ 25
5-6 GHz ≤ 10 ≤4 ≤2 ≤2 ≤ 1.5*∆zzoom(n-1) ≥ 22
*Also compliant to IEEE 1528-2013 Table 6
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 9 of 40
02/15/2019
4 T EST CONFIGURAT IO N PO SIT IO NS
4.1 Device Holder

The device holder is made out of low-loss POM material having the following dielectric parameters: relative
permittivity ε = 3 and loss tangent δ = 0.02.
4.2 SAR Testing for Tablet per KDB Publication 616217 D04v01r02
Per FCC KDB Publication 616217 D04v01r02, the back surface and edges of the tablet should be tested for SAR
compliance with the tablet touching the phantom. The SAR Exclusion Threshold in KDB 447498 D01v06 can be
applied to determine SAR test exclusion for adjacent edge configurations. The closest distance from the antenna
to an adjacent tablet edge is used to determine if SAR testing is required for the adjacent edges, with the adjacent
edge positioned against the phantom and the edge containing the antenna positioned perpendicular to the
phantom.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 10 of 40
02/15/2019
5 RF EXPOSURE L IMIT S
5.1 Uncontrolled Environment
UNCONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS are defined as locations where there is the exposure of individuals who
have no knowledge or control of their exposure. The general population/uncontrolled exposure limits are
applicable to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a
consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise
control over their exposure. Members of the general public would come under this category when exposure is not
employment-related; for example, in the case of a wireless transmitter that exposes persons in its vicinity.
5.2 Controlled Environment

CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENTS are defined as locations where there is exposure that may be incurred by
persons who are aware of the potential for exposure, (i.e. as a result of employment or occupation). In general,
occupational/controlled exposure limits are applicable to situations in which persons are exposed as a
consequence of their employment, who have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can
exercise control over their exposure. This exposure category is also applicable when the exposure is of a
transient nature due to incidental passage through a location where the exposure levels may be higher than the
general population/uncontrolled limits, but the exposed person is fully aware of the potential for exposure and can
exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means.
Table 5-1
SAR Human Exposure Specified in ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992 and Health Canada Safety Code 6
1. The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 1 gram of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shape of a cube) and over
the appropriate averaging time.
2. The Spatial Average value of the SAR averaged over the whole body.
3. The Spatial Peak value of the SAR averaged over any 10 grams of tissue (defined as a tissue volume in the shap e of a cube) and
over the appropriate averaging time.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 11 of 40
02/15/2019
6 FCC MEASUREMENT PROCEDUR ES
6.1 Measured and Reported SAR

Per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06, when SAR is not measured at the maximum power level allowed for
production units, the results must be scaled to the maximum tune-up tolerance limit according to the power
applied to the individual channels tested to determine compliance. For simultaneous transmission, the measured
aggregate SAR must be scaled according to the sum of the differences between the maximum tune-up tolerance
and actual power used to test each transmitter. When SAR is measured at or scaled to the maximum tune-up
tolerance limit, the results are referred to as reported SAR. The highest reported SAR results are identified on the
grant of equipment authorization according to procedures in KDB 690783 D01v01r03.
6.2 SAR Testing with 802.11 Transmitters

The normal network operating configurations of 802.11 transmitters are not suitable for SAR measurements.
Unpredictable fluctuations in network traffic and antenna diversity conditions can introduce undesirable variations
in SAR results. The SAR for these devices should be measured using chipset based test mode software to
ensure the results are consistent and reliable. See KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 for more details.
6.2.1 General Device Setup
Chipset based test mode software is hardware dependent and generally varies among manufacturers. The
device operating parameters established in test mode for SAR measurements must be identical to those
programmed in production units, including output power levels, amplifier gain settings and other RF
performance tuning parameters.
A periodic duty factor is required for current generation SAR systems to measure SAR. When 802.11 frame
gaps are accounted for in the transmission, a maximum transmission duty factor of 92 - 96% is typically
achievable in most test mode configurations. A minimum transmission duty factor of 85% is required to avoid
certain hardware and device implementation issues related to wide range SAR scaling. The reported SAR is
scaled to 100% transmission duty factor to determine compliance at the maximum tune-up tolerance limit.
6.2.2 U-NII-1 and U-NII-2A

For devices that operate in both U-NII-1 and U-NII-2A bands, when the same maximum output power is
specified for both bands, SAR measurement using OFDM SAR test procedures is not required for U-NII-1
unless the highest reported SAR for U-NII-2A is > 1.2 W/kg. When different maximum output powers are
specified for the bands, SAR measurement for the U-NII band with the lower maximum output power is not
required unless the highest reported SAR for the U-NII band with the higher maximum output power, adjusted
by the ratio of lower to higher specified maximum output power for the two bands, is > 1.2 W/kg. When 10g
SAR measurement is considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above.
6.2.3 U-NII-2C and U-NII-3

The frequency range covered by U-NII-2C and U-NII-3 is 380 MHz (5.47 – 5.85 GHz), which requires a
minimum of at least two SAR probe calibration frequency points to support SAR measurements. When
Terminal Doppler Weather Radar (TDWR) restriction applies, the channels at 5.60 – 5.65 GHz in U-NII-2C
band must be disabled with acceptable mechanisms and documented in the equipment certification. Unless
band gap channels are permanently disabled, SAR must be considered for these channels. Each band is
tested independently according to the normally required OFDM SAR measurement and probe calibration
frequency points requirements.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 12 of 40
02/15/2019
6.2.4 2.4 GHz SAR Test Requirements
SAR is measured for 2.4 GHz 802.11b DSSS using either the fixed test position or, when applicable, the initial
test position procedure. SAR test reduction is determined according to the following:
1) When the reported SAR of the highest measured maximum output power channel for the exposure
configuration is ≤ 0.8 W/kg, no further SAR testing is required for 802.11b DSSS in that exposure
configuration.
2) When the reported SAR is > 0.8 W/kg, SAR is required for that position using the next highest
measured output power channel. When any reported SAR is > 1.2 W/kg, SAR is required for the third
channel; i.e., all channels require testing.
2.4 GHz 802.11 g/n OFDM are additionally evaluated for SAR if the highest reported SAR for 802.11b,
adjusted by the ratio of the OFDM to DSSS specified maximum output power, is > 1.2 W/kg. When SAR is
required for OFDM modes in 2.4 GHz band, the Initial Test Configuration Procedures should be followed.
When 10g SAR measurement is considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above.
6.2.5 OFDM Transmission Mode and SAR Test Channel Selection

When the same maximum output power was specified for multiple OFDM transmission mode configurations in
a frequency band or aggregated band, SAR is measured using the configuration with the largest channel
bandwidth, lowest order modulation and lowest data rate. When the maximum output power of a channel is
the same for equivalent OFDM configurations; for example, 802.11a, 802.11n and 802.11ac or 802.11g and
802.11n with the same channel bandwidth, modulation and data rate etc., the lower order 802.11 mode i.e.,
802.11a, then 802.11n and 802.11ac or 802.11g then 802.11n, is used for SAR measurement. When the
maximum output power are the same for multiple test channels, either according to the default or additional
power measurement requirements, SAR is measured using the channel closest to the middle of the frequency
band or aggregated band. When there are multiple channels with the same maximum output power, SAR is
measured using the higher number channel.
6.2.6 Initial Test Configuration Procedure

For OFDM, an initial test configuration is determined for each frequency band and aggregated band,
according to the transmission mode with the highest maximum output power specified for SAR
measurements. When the same maximum output power is specified for multiple OFDM transmission mode
configurations in a frequency band or aggregated band, SAR is measured using the configuration(s) with the
largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation, lowest data rate and lowest order IEEE 802.11 mode.
The channel of the transmission mode with the highest average RF output conducted power will be the initial
test configuration.
When the reported SAR is ≤ 0.8 W/kg, no additional measurements on other test channels are required.
Otherwise, SAR is evaluated using the subsequent highest average RF output channel until the reported SAR
result is ≤ 1.2 W/kg or all channels are measured. When there are multiple untested channels having the
same subsequent highest average RF output power, the channel with higher frequency from the lowest
802.11 mode is considered for SAR measurements (See Section 6.2.5). When 10g SAR measurement is
considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above.
6.2.7 Subsequent Test Configuration Procedures

For OFDM configurations in each frequency band and aggregated band, SAR is evaluated for initial test
configuration using the fixed test position or the initial test position procedure. When the highest reported SAR
(for the initial test configuration), adjusted by the ratio of the specified maximum output power of the
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 13 of 40
02/15/2019
subsequent test configuration to initial test configuration, is ≤ 1.2 W/kg, no additional SAR tests for the
subsequent test configurations are required. When 10g SAR measurement is considered, a factor of 2.5 is
applied to the thresholds above.
6.2.8 MIMO SAR considerations

Per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02, the simultaneous SAR provisions in KDB Publication 447498
D01v06 should be applied to determine simultaneous transmission SAR test exclusion for WIFI MIMO. If the
sum of 1g single transmission chain SAR measurements is <1.6 W/kg, no additional SAR measurements for
MIMO are required. Alternatively, SAR for MIMO can be measured with all antennas transmitting
simultaneously at the specified maximum output power of MIMO operation. When 10g SAR measurement is
considered, a factor of 2.5 is applied to the thresholds above.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 14 of 40
02/15/2019
7 RF CONDUCTED POWERS
7.1 WLAN Conducted Powers

7.1.1 Variant 1
Table 7-1
2.4 GHz WLAN Average RF Power – Ant A
2.4GHz Conducted Power [dBm]
IEEE Transmission Mode
Freq [MHz] Channel 802.11b 802.11g 802.11n
Average Average Average
2412 1 15.42 15.00 15.00
2417 2 N/A 15.50 15.50
2437 6 15.44 15.36 15.36
2457 10 N/A 15.33 15.33
2462 11 15.40 13.39 13.39
Table 7-2
2.4 GHz WLAN Average RF Power – Ant B
2412 1 15.06 14.95 14.95
2417 2 N/A 15.48 15.48
2437 6 15.25 15.49 15.49
2457 10 N/A 15.38 15.38
2462 11 15.28 13.37 13.37
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 15 of 40
02/15/2019
Table 7-3
5 GHz WLAN Average RF Power – Ant A
5GHz (40MHz) Conducted Power [dBm]
Freq [MHz] Channel 802.11n 802.11ac
Average Average
5190 38 13.43 13.44
5230 46 16.40 16.48
5270 54 16.99 17.00
5310 62 14.47 14.33

IEEE Transmission
Mode
Freq [MHz] Channel
802.11ac
Average
5530 106 13.50
5610 122 16.94
5690 138 16.88
5775 155 16.18
Table 7-4
5 GHz WLAN Average RF Power – Ant B
Average Average
5190 38 13.50 13.50
5230 46 16.23 16.13
5270 54 16.71 16.72
5310 62 14.49 14.33

IEEE Transmission
Mode
Freq [MHz] Channel
802.11ac
Average
5530 106 13.47
5610 122 16.88
5690 138 17.00
5775 155 16.48
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 16 of 40
02/15/2019
7.1.2 Variant 2
Table 7-5
2.4 GHz WLAN Average RF Power – Ant A
2412 1 15.41 14.95 14.95
2417 2 N/A 15.48 15.48
2437 6 15.50 15.50 15.50
2457 10 N/A 15.49 15.49
2462 11 15.49 13.38 13.38
Table 7-6
2.4 GHz WLAN Average RF Power – Ant B
2412 1 15.40 14.99 14.99
2417 2 N/A 15.50 15.50
2437 6 15.30 15.49 15.49
2457 10 N/A 15.45 15.45
2462 11 15.41 13.30 13.30
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 17 of 40
02/15/2019
Table 7-7
5 GHz WLAN Average RF Power – Ant A
Average Average
5190 38 13.50 13.41
5230 46 16.38 16.42
5270 54 16.95 16.82
5310 62 14.44 14.33

IEEE Transmission
Mode
Freq [MHz] Channel
802.11ac
Average
5530 106 13.42
5610 122 16.99
5690 138 16.85
5775 155 16.25
Table 7-8
5 GHz WLAN Average RF Power – Ant B
Average Average
5190 38 13.37 13.31
5230 46 16.25 16.22
5270 54 16.75 16.66
5310 62 14.50 14.35

IEEE Transmission
Mode
Freq [MHz] Channel
802.11ac
Average
5530 106 13.47
5610 122 16.86
5690 138 16.93
5775 155 16.41
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 18 of 40
02/15/2019
7.1.3 Notes for WLAN
Justification for test configurations for WLAN per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02:
• Power measurements were performed for the transmission mode configuration with the highest maximum
output power specified for production units.
• For transmission modes with the same maximum output power specification, powers were measured for
the largest channel bandwidth, lowest order modulation and lowest data rate.
• For transmission modes with identical maximum specified output power, channel bandwidth, modulation
and data rates, power measurements were required for all identical configurations.
• For each transmission mode configuration, powers were measured for the highest and lowest channels;
and at the mid-band channel(s) when there were at least 3 channels supported. For configurations with
multiple mid-band channels, due to an even number of channels, both channels were measured.
• The bolded data rate and channel above were tested for SAR.
• The WLAN chipset in this device is produced by two different suppliers. The electrically identical modules
are manufactured with the identical mechanical structure to meet the same specifications and functions.
Two device variants are referenced as Variant 1 and Variant 2 in this report.
• WLAN SAR worst case configuration was spotchecked on Variant 1 and Variant 2. The Variant with the
highest reported SAR value was evaluated for the remaining WLAN configurations.
• Full power measurements were performed for Variant 1 and Variant 2 per FCC KDB Publication 248227.
Wireless Device Power Sensor Power Meter
Figure 7-1
Power Measurement Setup
7.2 Bluetooth Conducted Powers

7.2.1 Variant 1
Table 7-9
Maximum Bluetooth Average RF Power – Ant A
Avg Conducted
Data Power
Frequency Channel
Modulation Rate
[MHz] No.
[Mbps] [dBm] [mW]
2402 GFSK 1.0 0 15.02 31.769
2441 GFSK 1.0 39 15.94 39.264
2480 GFSK 1.0 78 15.44 34.995
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 19 of 40
02/15/2019
Table 7-10
Reduced Bluetooth Average RF Power – Ant A
Avg Conducted
Data Power
Frequency Channel
Modulation Rate
[MHz] No.
[Mbps] [dBm] [mW]
2402 GFSK 1.0 0 9.68 9.290
2441 GFSK 1.0 39 9.27 8.453
2480 GFSK 1.0 78 9.33 8.570
7.2.2 Variant 2
Table 7-11
Maximum Bluetooth Average RF Power – Ant A
Avg Conducted
Data Power
Frequency Channel
Modulation Rate
[MHz] No.
[Mbps] [dBm] [mW]
2402 GFSK 1.0 0 15.05 31.989
2441 GFSK 1.0 39 15.22 33.266
2480 GFSK 1.0 78 15.00 31.623
Table 7-12
Reduced Bluetooth Average RF Power – Ant A
Avg Conducted
Data Power
Frequency Channel
Modulation Rate
[MHz] No.
[Mbps] [dBm] [mW]
2402 GFSK 1.0 0 9.30 8.511
2441 GFSK 1.0 39 9.53 8.974
2480 GFSK 1.0 78 9.71 9.354
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 20 of 40
02/15/2019
7.3 Bluetooth Duty Cycle
7.3.1 Maximum Bluetooth Transmission Antenna A Variant 1
Figure 7-2
Maximum Bluetooth Transmission Antenna A Variant 1 Plot
Equation 7-1
Bluetooth Duty Cycle Calculation
𝑷𝒖𝒍𝒔𝒆 𝑾𝒊𝒅𝒕𝒉 𝟐. 𝟗𝟎𝟒𝒎𝒔

𝑫𝒖𝒕𝒚 𝑪𝒚𝒄𝒍𝒆 = ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = 𝟕𝟕. 𝟒%
𝑷𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒅 𝟑. 𝟕𝟓𝟐𝒎𝒔
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 21 of 40
02/15/2019
7.3.2 Maximum Bluetooth Transmission Antenna A Variant 2
Figure 7-3
Maximum Bluetooth Transmission Antenna A Variant 2 Plot
Equation 7-2
𝑷𝒖𝒍𝒔𝒆 𝑾𝒊𝒅𝒕𝒉 𝟐. 𝟗𝟎𝟒𝒎𝒔

𝑫𝒖𝒕𝒚 𝑪𝒚𝒄𝒍𝒆 = ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = 𝟕𝟕. 𝟒%
𝑷𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒅 𝟑. 𝟕𝟓𝟐𝒎𝒔
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 22 of 40
02/15/2019
7.3.3 Reduced Bluetooth Transmission Antenna A Variant 1
Figure 7-4
Reduced Bluetooth Transmission Antenna A Variant 1 Plot
Equation 7-3
𝑷𝒖𝒍𝒔𝒆 𝑾𝒊𝒅𝒕𝒉 𝟐. 𝟖𝟗𝟔𝒎𝒔

𝑫𝒖𝒕𝒚 𝑪𝒚𝒄𝒍𝒆 = ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = 𝟕𝟕. 𝟒%
𝑷𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒅 𝟑. 𝟕𝟒𝟒𝒎𝒔
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 23 of 40
02/15/2019
7.3.4 Reduced Bluetooth Transmission Antenna A Variant 2
Figure 7-5
Reduced Bluetooth Transmission Antenna A Variant 2 Plot
Equation 7-4
Reduced Bluetooth Duty Cycle Calculation
𝑷𝒖𝒍𝒔𝒆 𝑾𝒊𝒅𝒕𝒉 𝟐. 𝟖𝟗𝟔𝒎𝒔

𝑫𝒖𝒕𝒚 𝑪𝒚𝒄𝒍𝒆 = ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = ∗ 𝟏𝟎𝟎% = 𝟕𝟕. 𝟒%
𝑷𝒆𝒓𝒊𝒐𝒅 𝟑. 𝟕𝟒𝟒𝒎𝒔
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 24 of 40
02/15/2019
7.4 Bluetooth Power Reduction Verification Summary
Maximum Target
Reduced Target Power Maximum Reduced
Power
Antenna Mode/Band Condition (s) [dBm] Measured Power Measured Power Verdict
[dBm]
(Tolerance [dB]) (Tolerance [dB]) [dBm] [dBm]
2.4 GHz Bluetooth 5 GHz WLAN ON ANT A 15.5 (+1.5/-2.0) 8.5 (+1.5/-2.0) 15.25 8.25 PASS
A 2.4 GHz Bluetooth 5 GHz WLAN ON ANT B 15.5 (+1.5/-2.0) 8.5 (+1.5/-2.0) 15.25 8.17 PASS
2.4 GHz Bluetooth 5 GHz WLAN ON ANT A & B 15.5 (+1.5/-2.0) 8.5 (+1.5/-2.0) 15.25 8.24 PASS
Conducted powers were measured for each Mode/Band and applied condition. All conducted power
measurements were verified to be within tolerance.
7.5 Notes for Bluetooth

• The Bluetooth chipset in this device is produced by two different suppliers. The electrically identical
modules are manufactured with the identical mechanical structure to meet the same specifications and
functions. Two device variants are referenced as Variant 1 and Variant 2 in this report.
• Bluetooth SAR worst case configuration was spotchecked on Variant 1 and Variant 2. The Variant with
the highest reported SAR value was evaluated for the remaining Bluetooth configurations.
• Full power measurements were performed for Variant 1 and Variant 2 per FCC KDB Publication 248227.
• Bluetooth operations are reduced in output power when it is operating simultaneously with 5 GHz WLAN.
Detailed description of the power reduction mechanism is included in the operational description.
Figure 7-6
Power Measurement Setup
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 25 of 40
02/15/2019
8 SYST EM VERIF ICAT ION
8.1 Tissue Verification

Table 8-1
Measured Tissue Properties
Calibrated for Tissue Temp Measured Measured Measured TARGET TARGET
Tests Tissue Type During Calibration Frequency Conductivity, Dielectric Conductivity, Dielectric % dev σ % dev ε
Performed on: (˚C) (MHz) σ (S/m) Constant, ε σ (S/m) Constant, ε
2400 1.973 51.856 1.902 52.767 3.73% -1.73%

6/3/2019 2400B 21.4 2450 2.019 51.784 1.950 52.700 3.54% -1.74%
2500 2.064 51.715 2.021 52.636 2.13% -1.75%
2400 1.950 51.168 1.902 52.767 2.52% -3.03%
6/4/2019 2400B 20.4 2450 1.996 51.099 1.950 52.700 2.36% -3.04%
2500 2.041 51.014 2.021 52.636 0.99% -3.08%
5180 5.293 46.915 5.276 49.041 0.32% -4.34%
5200 5.318 46.882 5.299 49.014 0.36% -4.35%
5220 5.339 46.846 5.323 48.987 0.30% -4.37%
5240 5.368 46.792 5.346 48.960 0.41% -4.43%
5260 5.396 46.778 5.369 48.933 0.50% -4.40%
5280 5.419 46.749 5.393 48.906 0.48% -4.41%
5300 5.438 46.699 5.416 48.879 0.41% -4.46%
5320 5.469 46.655 5.439 48.851 0.55% -4.50%
5500 5.703 46.360 5.650 48.607 0.94% -4.62%
5520 5.727 46.331 5.673 48.580 0.95% -4.63%
5540 5.754 46.309 5.696 48.553 1.02% -4.62%
5560 5.782 46.283 5.720 48.526 1.08% -4.62%
05/20/2019 5200B-5800B 20.9 5580 5.817 46.249 5.743 48.499 1.29% -4.64%
5600 5.839 46.199 5.766 48.471 1.27% -4.69%
5620 5.866 46.183 5.790 48.444 1.31% -4.67%
5640 5.894 46.142 5.813 48.417 1.39% -4.70%
5660 5.925 46.124 5.837 48.390 1.51% -4.68%
5680 5.950 46.095 5.860 48.363 1.54% -4.69%
5700 5.972 46.054 5.883 48.336 1.51% -4.72%
5745 6.030 46.015 5.936 48.275 1.58% -4.68%
5765 6.060 45.977 5.959 48.248 1.69% -4.71%
5785 6.088 45.949 5.982 48.220 1.77% -4.71%
5800 6.105 45.925 6.000 48.200 1.75% -4.72%
5805 6.109 45.920 6.006 48.193 1.71% -4.72%
5825 6.136 45.890 6.029 48.166 1.77% -4.73%
The above measured tissue parameters were used in the DASY software. The DASY software was used to
perform interpolation to determine the dielectric parameters at the SAR test device frequencies (per KDB
Publication 865664 D01v01r04 and IEEE 1528-2013 6.6.1.2). The tissue parameters listed in the SAR test plots
may slightly differ from the table above due to significant digit rounding in the software.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 26 of 40
02/15/2019
8.2 Test System Verification
Prior to SAR assessment, the system is verified to ±10% of the SAR measurement on the reference dipole at the
time of calibration by the calibration facility. Full system validation status and result summary can be found in
Appendix E.
Table 8-2
System Verification Results – 1g
Tissue Input 1 W Target
SAR Tissue Amb. Liquid Source Probe Measured 1 W Normalized Deviation1g
Frequency Date Power SAR1g
System # Type Temp (°C) Temp (°C) SN SN SAR1g (W/kg) SAR1g (W/kg) (%)
(MHz) (W) (W/kg)
AM7 2450 BODY 06/03/2019 20.9 20.5 0.100 921 3837 5.240 50.800 52.400 3.15%
AM3 2450 BODY 06/04/2019 21.9 20.4 0.100 921 7420 5.260 50.800 52.600 3.54%
AM2 5250 BODY 05/20/2019 21.7 20.9 0.050 1163 7416 3.800 77.700 76.000 -2.19%
AM2 5600 BODY 05/20/2019 21.7 20.9 0.050 1163 7416 4.210 80.100 84.200 5.12%
AM2 5750 BODY 05/20/2019 21.7 20.9 0.050 1163 7416 3.660 77.800 73.200 -5.91%
Figure 8-1 Figure 8-2

System Verification Setup Diagram System Verification Setup Photo
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 27 of 40
02/15/2019
9 SAR DAT A SUMMARY
9.1 Standalone Body SAR Data
Table 9-1
2.4 GHz WLAN Body SAR Data
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
Duty Reported SAR Reported SAR
FREQUENCY Bandw idth Maxim um Allow ed Conducted Pow er Pow er Drift Antenna Device Serial Data Rate SAR (1g) Scaling Factor Scaling Factor SAR (10g)
Mode Service Spacing Variant Side Cycle (1g) (10g) Plot #
[MHz] Pow er [dBm ] [dBm ] [dB] Config. Num ber (Mbps) (Pow er) (Duty Cycle)
MHz Ch. (%) (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg)
2437 6 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.50 0.08 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02VMLWC 1 back 100.0 0.045 1.122 1.000 0.050 0.020 0.022
2412 1 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.41 -0.01 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02VMLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.622 1.146 1.000 0.713 0.206 0.236
2437 6 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.50 0.00 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02VMLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.815 1.122 1.000 0.914 0.264 0.296 A1
2437 6 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.44 0.05 0 mm A 1 F9FYL02ZMLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.696 1.138 1.000 0.792 0.231 0.263
2462 11 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.49 -0.13 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02VMLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.622 1.125 1.000 0.700 0.207 0.233
2437 6 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.50 0.00 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02VMLWC 1 right 100.0 0.000 1.122 1.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
2437 6 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.50 0.15 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02VMLWC 1 left 100.0 0.120 1.122 1.000 0.135 0.052 0.058
2462 11 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.28 0.05 0 mm B 1 F9FYL032MLWC 1 back 100.0 0.060 1.180 1.000 0.071 0.028 0.033
2412 1 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.06 -0.09 0 mm B 1 F9FYL032MLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.641 1.242 1.000 0.796 0.210 0.261
2437 6 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.25 -0.15 0 mm B 1 F9FYL032MLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.717 1.189 1.000 0.853 0.236 0.281
2462 11 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.28 0.02 0 mm B 1 F9FYL032MLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.810 1.180 1.000 0.956 0.266 0.314
2462 11 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.41 0.03 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02VMLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.719 1.146 1.000 0.824 0.236 0.270
2462 11 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.28 -0.02 0 mm B 1 F9FYL032MLWC 1 right 100.0 0.139 1.180 1.000 0.164 0.060 0.071
2462 11 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.28 0.20 0 mm B 1 F9FYL032MLWC 1 left 100.0 0.002 1.180 1.000 0.002 0.000 0.000
2437 6 802.11b DSSS 22 16.0 15.50 0.03 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02VMLWC 1 bottom 100.0 0.790 1.122 1.000 0.886 0.257 0.288
ANSI / IEEE C95.1 1992 - SAFETY LIMIT Body
Spatial Peak 1.6 W/kg (mW/g)

Uncontrolled Exposure/General Population averaged over 1 gram
Note: Blue entry indicated variability measurement.
Table 9-2
U-NII-2A WLAN Body SAR Data
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 17.00 16.99 0.15 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 13.5 back 97.5 0.045 1.002 1.026 0.046 0.017 0.017
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 17.00 16.99 -0.19 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 13.5 bottom 97.5 1.020 1.002 1.026 1.049 0.330 0.339 A2
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 17.00 16.95 -0.01 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 13.5 bottom 97.5 0.874 1.012 1.026 0.907 0.284 0.295
5310 62 802.11n OFDM 40 15.00 14.47 -0.14 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 13.5 bottom 97.5 0.543 1.130 1.026 0.630 0.174 0.202
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 17.00 16.99 0.12 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 13.5 right 97.5 0.002 1.002 1.026 0.002 0.000 0.000
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 17.00 16.99 0.15 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 13.5 left 97.5 0.145 1.002 1.026 0.149 0.055 0.057
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 16.75 16.71 -0.17 0 mm B 1 F9FYL030MLWC 13.5 back 97.6 0.083 1.009 1.025 0.086 0.032 0.033
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 16.75 16.71 -0.04 0 mm B 1 F9FYL030MLWC 13.5 bottom 97.6 0.827 1.009 1.025 0.855 0.277 0.286
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 16.75 16.75 -0.02 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 13.5 bottom 97.6 0.741 1.000 1.025 0.760 0.252 0.258
5310 62 802.11n OFDM 40 15.00 14.49 -0.08 0 mm B 1 F9FYL030MLWC 13.5 bottom 97.6 0.517 1.125 1.025 0.596 0.174 0.201
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 16.75 16.71 -0.05 0 mm B 1 F9FYL030MLWC 13.5 right 97.6 0.109 1.009 1.025 0.113 0.045 0.047
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 16.75 16.71 0.15 0 mm B 1 F9FYL030MLWC 13.5 left 97.6 0.001 1.009 1.025 0.001 0.000 0.000
5270 54 802.11n OFDM 40 17.00 16.99 0.02 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 13.5 bottom 97.5 0.940 1.002 1.026 0.966 0.311 0.320

Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 28 of 40
02/15/2019
Table 9-3
U-NII-2C WLAN Body SAR Data
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
5690 138 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.50 16.88 0.16 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 29.3 back 95.1 0.117 1.153 1.052 0.142 0.036 0.044
5530 106 802.11ac OFDM 80 14.00 13.50 -0.21 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 29.3 bottom 95.1 0.378 1.122 1.052 0.446 0.127 0.150
5690 138 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.50 16.85 0.06 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 bottom 95.1 0.828 1.161 1.052 1.011 0.283 0.346
5690 138 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.50 16.88 0.13 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 29.3 right 95.1 0.005 1.153 1.052 0.006 0.001 0.001
5690 138 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.50 16.88 -0.14 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 29.3 left 95.1 0.163 1.153 1.052 0.198 0.056 0.068
5690 138 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.25 16.93 0.09 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 back 95.2 0.105 1.076 1.050 0.119 0.039 0.044
5530 106 802.11ac OFDM 80 14.00 13.47 -0.09 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 bottom 95.2 0.348 1.130 1.050 0.413 0.125 0.148
5610 122 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.00 16.86 0.06 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 bottom 95.2 0.871 1.033 1.050 0.945 0.311 0.337
5690 138 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.25 17.00 0.05 0 mm B 1 F9FYL030MLWC 29.3 bottom 95.2 0.856 1.059 1.050 0.952 0.305 0.339
5690 138 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.25 16.93 -0.17 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 right 95.2 0.090 1.076 1.050 0.102 0.033 0.037
5690 138 802.11ac OFDM 80 17.25 16.93 -0.14 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 left 95.2 0.009 1.076 1.050 0.010 0.002 0.002

Table 9-4
U-NII-3 WLAN Body SAR Data
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.25 16.18 0.19 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 29.3 back 95.1 0.040 1.016 1.052 0.043 0.014 0.015
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.25 16.18 0.08 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 29.3 bottom 95.1 0.736 1.016 1.052 0.787 0.259 0.277
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.25 16.25 -0.04 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 bottom 95.1 0.725 1.000 1.052 0.763 0.243 0.256
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.25 16.18 0.00 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 29.3 right 95.1 0.000 1.016 1.052 0.000 0.000 0.000
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.25 16.18 0.14 0 mm A 1 F9FYL032MLWC 29.3 left 95.1 0.103 1.016 1.052 0.110 0.036 0.038
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.50 16.41 -0.06 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 back 95.2 0.087 1.021 1.050 0.093 0.033 0.035
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.50 16.48 0.02 0 mm B 1 F9FYL030MLWC 29.3 bottom 95.2 0.812 1.005 1.050 0.857 0.288 0.304
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.50 16.41 0.15 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 right 95.2 0.105 1.021 1.050 0.113 0.039 0.042
5775 155 802.11ac OFDM 80 16.50 16.41 0.01 0 mm B 2 F9FYL02PMLWC 29.3 left 95.2 0.001 1.021 1.050 0.001 0.000 0.000

Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 29 of 40
02/15/2019
Table 9-5
Bluetooth Maximum Body SAR Data
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
Maxim um Duty Reported SAR Reported SAR
FREQUENCY Conducted Pow er Drift Antenna Device Serial Data Rate SAR (1g) Scaling Factor Scaling Factor SAR (10g)
Mode Service Allow ed Spacing Variant Side Cycle (1g) (10g) Plot #
Pow er [dBm ] [dB] Config. Num ber (Mbps) (Cond Pow er) (Duty Cycle)
MHz Ch. Pow er [dBm ] (%) (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg)
2441 39 Bluetooth FHSS 17.00 15.22 -0.04 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 back 77.4 0.032 1.507 1.001 0.048 0.014 0.021
2402 0 Bluetooth FHSS 17.00 15.05 -0.06 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 bottom 77.4 0.459 1.567 1.001 0.720 0.149 0.234
2441 39 Bluetooth FHSS 17.00 15.22 -0.06 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 bottom 77.4 0.714 1.507 1.001 1.077 0.233 0.351
2441 39 Bluetooth FHSS 17.00 15.94 -0.04 0 mm A 1 F9FYL02ZMLWC 1 bottom 77.4 0.726 1.276 1.001 0.927 0.242 0.309 A3
2480 78 Bluetooth FHSS 17.00 15.00 0.03 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 bottom 77.4 0.619 1.585 1.001 0.982 0.201 0.319
2441 39 Bluetooth FHSS 17.00 15.22 0.13 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 right 77.4 0.001 1.507 1.001 0.002 0.000 0.000
2441 39 Bluetooth FHSS 17.00 15.22 -0.05 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 left 77.4 0.075 1.507 1.001 0.113 0.032 0.048

Note: The reported SAR was scaled to the 77.5% transmission duty factor to determine compliance since the duty
factor of the device is permanently limited to 77.5% per the manufacturer.
Table 9-6
Bluetooth Reduced Body SAR Data
MEASUREMENT RESULTS
Maxim um Duty Reported SAR Reported SAR
FREQUENCY Conducted Pow er Drift Antenna Device Serial Data Rate SAR (1g) Scaling Factor Scaling Factor SAR (10g)
Mode Service Allow ed Spacing Variant Side Cycle (1g) (10g) Plot #
Pow er [dBm ] [dB] Config. Num ber (Mbps) (Cond Pow er) (Duty Cycle)
MHz Ch. Pow er [dBm ] (%) (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg)
2480 78 Bluetooth FHSS 10.00 9.71 -0.20 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 back 77.4 0.011 1.069 1.001 0.012 0.004 0.004
2480 78 Bluetooth FHSS 10.00 9.71 0.03 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 bottom 77.4 0.199 1.069 1.001 0.213 0.064 0.068
2480 78 Bluetooth FHSS 10.00 9.71 -0.13 0 mm A 2 F9FYL02NMLWC 1 left 77.4 0.024 1.069 1.001 0.026 0.010 0.011

Note: The reported SAR was scaled to the 77.5% transmission duty factor to determine compliance since the duty
factor of the device is permanently limited to 77.5% per the manufacturer.
9.2 SAR Test Notes

General Notes:
1. The test data reported are the worst-case SAR values according to test procedures specified in FCC KDB
Publication 616217 D04v01r02 and FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06.
2. Batteries are fully charged at the beginning of the SAR measurements.
3. Liquid tissue depth was at least 15.0 cm for all frequencies.
4. The manufacturer has confirmed that the device(s) tested have the same physical, mechanical and
thermal characteristics and are within operational tolerances expected for production units.
5. SAR results were scaled to the maximum allowed power to demonstrate compliance per FCC KDB
Publication 447498 D01v06.
6. Per FCC KDB 865664 D01v01r04, variability SAR tests were performed when the measured SAR results
for a frequency band were greater than or equal to 0.8 W/kg. Repeated SAR measurements are
highlighted in the tables above for clarity. Please see Section 11 for variability analysis.
7. FCC KDB Publication 616217 D04v01r02 Section 4.3, SAR tests are required for the back surface and
edges of the tablet with the tablet touching the phantom. The SAR Exclusion Threshold in FCC KDB
447498 D01v06 was applied to determine SAR test exclusion for adjacent edge configurations.
8. This device utilizes power reduction for some wireless modes and technologies, as outlined in Section
1.2. The maximum output power allowed for each transmitter and exposure condition was evaluated for
SAR compliance based on expected use conditions and simultaneous transmission scenarios.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 30 of 40
02/15/2019
WLAN Notes:
1. Justification for test configurations for WLAN per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 for 2.4 GHz WIFI
single transmission chain operations, the highest measured maximum output power channel for DSSS
was selected for SAR measurement. SAR for OFDM modes (2.4 GHz 802.11g/n) was not required due to
the maximum allowed powers and the highest reported DSSS SAR. See Section 6.2.4 for more
information.
2. Justification for test configurations for WLAN per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02 for 5 GHz WIFI
single transmission chain operations, the initial test configuration was selected according to the
transmission mode with the highest maximum allowed powers. Other transmission modes were not
investigated since the highest reported SAR for initial test configuration adjusted by the ratio of maximum
output powers is less than 1.2 W/kg for 1g evaluations. See Section 6.2.5 for more information.
3. Per KDB Publication 248227 D01v02r02, SAR for MIMO was evaluated by following the simultaneous
SAR provisions from KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 by either evaluating the sum of the 1g SAR values
of each antenna transmitting independently or making a SAR measurement with both antennas
transmitting simultaneously. Please see Section 10 for complete analysis.
4. When the maximum reported 1g averaged SAR is ≤0.8 W/kg, SAR testing on additional channels was not
required. Otherwise, SAR for the next highest output power channel was required until the reported SAR
result was ≤ 1.20 W/kg for 1g evaluations or all test channels were measured.
5. The device was configured to transmit continuously at the required data rate, channel bandwidth and
signal modulation, using the highest transmission duty factor supported by the test mode tools. The
reported SAR was scaled to the 100% transmission duty factor to determine compliance. Procedures
used to measure the duty factor are identical to that in the associated EMC test reports.
Bluetooth Notes
1. Bluetooth SAR was measured with a test mode with hopping disabled with DH5 operation. The reported
SAR was scaled to the 77.5% transmission duty factor to determine compliance since the duty factor of
the device is limited to 77.5% per the manufacturer. See Section 7.3 for the time domain plot and
calculation for the duty factor of the device.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 31 of 40
02/15/2019
10 FCC MULT I-T X AND ANT ENNA SAR CO NSIDERAT IO NS
10.1 Introduction
The following procedures adopted from FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 are applicable to devices with built-
in unlicensed transmitters such as 802.11 and Bluetooth devices which may simultaneously transmit together.
10.2 Simultaneous Transmission Procedures

This device contains transmitters that may operate simultaneously. Therefore, simultaneous transmission analysis
is required. Per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 4.3.2 and IEEE 1528-2013 Section 6.3.4.1.2, simultaneous
transmission SAR test exclusion may be applied when the sum of the 1g SAR for all the simultaneous transmitting
antennas in a specific a physical test configuration is ≤1.6 W/kg. The different test positions in an exposure
condition may be considered collectively to determine SAR test exclusion according to the sum of 1g or 10g SAR.
Note:
** The SAR distributions for at least one of the antennas are spatially separated from the other antennas per FCC
KDB Publication 248227 Section 6.1 procedures. Therefore, the simultaneous transmissions were treated
independently for this configuration. See Section 10.4 for more information about the Spatial Separation Analysis.
10.3 Body SAR Simultaneous Transmission Analysis
Table 10-1
Simultaneous Transmission Scenario with 2.4 GHz WLAN
2.4 GHz WLAN 2.4 GHz WLAN Σ SAR

Ant A SAR (W/kg) Ant B SAR (W/kg) (W/kg)
Simult Tx Configuration
1 2 1+2
Back 0.050 0.071 0.121
Top 0.400* 0.400* 0.800
Body SAR Bottom 0.914 0.956 0.956**
Right 0.000 0.164 0.164
Left 0.135 0.002 0.137
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 32 of 40
02/15/2019
Table 10-2
Simultaneous Transmission Scenario with 5 GHz WLAN
5 GHz WLAN Ant 5 GHz WLAN Ant Σ SAR

A SAR (W/kg) B SAR (W/kg) (W/kg)
Simult Tx Configuration
1 2 1+2
Back 0.142 0.119 0.261
Top 0.400* 0.400* 0.800
Body SAR Bottom 1.141 1.041 1.141**
Right 0.006 0.113 0.119
Left 0.198 0.010 0.208
Table 10-3
Simultaneous Transmission Scenario with 2.4 GHz Bluetooth and 5GHz WLAN MIMO
Bluetooth Ant A
5 GHz WLAN Ant A 5 GHz WLAN Ant B
SAR at 10.0 dBm Σ SAR (W/kg)
SAR (W/kg) SAR (W/kg)
Simult Tx Configuration (W/kg)
1 2 3 1+2 1+3 1+2+3

Back 0.012 0.142 0.119 0.154 0.131 0.273
Top 0.400* 0.400* 0.400* 0.800 0.800 1.200
Body SAR Bottom 0.213 1.141 1.041 1.354 1.254 1.354**
Right 0.400* 0.006 0.113 0.406 0.513 0.519
Left 0.026 0.198 0.010 0.224 0.036 0.234
Note: (*) When the antenna separation distance was > 50 mm, an estimated SAR of 0.4 W/kg was used to
determine the simultaneous transmission SAR exclusion for test positions excluded per FCC KDB
Publication 447498D01v06. The simultaneous SAR sum using this estimation are highlighted in gray.
10.4 Spatial Separation Analysis

Per FCC KDB Publication 248227, antennas may be considered spatially separated when the aggregate SAR
from multiple antennas at any location in the combined SAR distribution is either ≤ 1.2 W/kg where at least 90% of
the SAR is attributed to a single SAR distribution or ≤ 0.4 W/kg where no more than one SAR distribution is
contributing > 0.1 W/kg.
Spatial separation was determined by inspection of the area scan SAR distributions to confirm that at all locations,
SAR was < 1.2 W/kg, where at least 90% of the SAR is attributed to a single SAR distribution. See below for
illustrations of the spatial separated antennas considered.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 33 of 40
02/15/2019
10.4.1 Bottom Edge Spatial Separation Analysis
Figure 10-1
Bottom Edge Spatial Separation for Antenna A and Antenna B
10.5 Simultaneous Transmission Conclusion

The above numerical summed SAR results and spatial separation analysis for all the worst-case simultaneous
transmission conditions were below the SAR limit. Therefore, the above analysis is sufficient to determine that
simultaneous transmission cases will not exceed the SAR limit and therefore no measured volumetric
simultaneous SAR summation is required per FCC KDB Publication 447498 D01v06 and IEEE 1528-2013
Section 6.3.4.1.2.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 34 of 40
02/15/2019
11 SAR MEASUREMENT VARI ABIL IT Y
11.1 Measurement Variability
Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04, SAR measurement variability was assessed for each frequency
band, which was determined by the SAR probe calibration point and tissue-equivalent medium used for the
device measurements. When both head and body tissue-equivalent media were required for SAR measurements
in a frequency band, the variability measurement procedures were applied to the tissue medium with the highest
measured SAR, using the highest measured SAR configuration for that tissue-equivalent medium. These
additional measurements were repeated after the completion of all measurements requiring the same head or
body tissue-equivalent medium in a frequency band. The test device was returned to ambient conditions (normal
room temperature) with the battery fully charged before it was re-mounted on the device holder for the repeated
measurement(s) to minimize any unexpected variations in the repeated results.
SAR Measurement Variability was assessed using the following procedures for each frequency band:
1) When the original highest measured SAR is ≥ 0.80 W/kg, the measurement was repeated once.
2) A second repeated measurement was performed only if the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the
original and first repeated measurements was > 1.20 or when the original or repeated measurement was
≥ 1.45 W/kg (~ 10% from the 1g SAR limit).
3) A third repeated measurement was performed only if the original, first or second repeated measurement
was ≥ 1.5 W/kg and the ratio of largest to smallest SAR for the original, first and second repeated
measurements is > 1.20.
4) Repeated measurements are not required when the original highest measured SAR is < 0.80 W/kg
Table 11-1
Body SAR Measurement Variability Results
BODY VARIABILITY RESULTS
1st 2nd 3rd
Measured
FREQUENCY Repeated Repeated Repeated
Data Rate SAR (1g)
Band Mode Service Antenna Config. Variant Side Spacing SAR (1g) Ratio SAR (1g) Ratio SAR (1g) Ratio
(Mbps)
MHz Ch. (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg) (W/kg)
2450 2437.00 6 802.11b, 22 MHz Bandwidth DSSS A 2 1 bottom 0 mm 0.815 0.790 1.03 N/A N/A N/A N/A
5250 5270.00 54 802.11n, 40 MHz Bandwidth OFDM A 1 13.5 bottom 0 mm 1.020 0.940 1.09 N/A N/A N/A N/A
5600 5610.00 122 802.11ac, 80 MHz Bandwidth OFDM B 2 29.3 bottom 0 mm 0.871 0.819 1.06 N/A N/A N/A N/A
5750 5690.00 138 802.11ac, 80 MHz Bandwidth OFDM A 1 29.3 bottom 0 mm 0.941 0.876 1.07 N/A N/A N/A N/A

11.2 Measurement Uncertainty

The measured SAR was <1.5 W/kg for 1g for all frequency bands. Therefore, per KDB Publication 865664
D01v01r04, the extended measurement uncertainty analysis per IEEE 1528-2013 was not required.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 35 of 40
02/15/2019
12 EQUIPMENT LIST
Manufacturer Model Description Cal Date Cal Interval Cal Due Serial Number
Agilent 85033E 3.5mm Standard Calibration Kit 8/13/2018 Annual 8/13/2019 MY53402352
Agilent 8753ES S-Parameter Network Analyzer 10/2/2018 Annual 10/2/2019 US39170118
Agilent E4438C ESG Vector Signal Generator 6/22/2018 Annual 6/22/2019 MY53401181
Agilent E4440A PSA Series Spectrum Analyzer 11/14/2018 Annual 11/14/2019 MY46186272
Agilent N5182A MXG Vector Signal Generator 6/15/2018 Annual 6/15/2019 MY47420837
Amplifier Research 150A100C Amplifier CBT N/A CBT 350132
Amplifier Research 15S1G6 Amplifier CBT N/A CBT 343972
Anritsu MA24106A USB Power Sensor 7/17/2018 Annual 7/17/2019 1827527
Anritsu ML2495A Power Meter 10/21/2018 Annual 10/21/2019 941001
Control Company 4040 Temperature / Humidity Monitor 2/28/2018 Biennial 2/28/2020 150761911
Control Company 4352 Ultra Long Stem Thermometer 5/21/2018 Biennial 5/21/2020 181292054
Control Company 4352 Ultra Long Stem Thermometer 5/21/2018 Biennial 5/21/2020 181292061
MCL BW-N6W5+ 6dB Attenuator CBT N/A CBT 1139
Mini Circuits ZHDC-16-63-S+ 50-6000MHz Bidirectional Coupler CBT N/A CBT N/A
Mini Circuits ZNDC-20-2G-S+ 800-2000MHz Bidirectional Coupler CBT N/A CBT N/A
Mini Circuits NLP-2950+ Low Pass Filter CBT N/A CBT N/A
Mini Circuits NLP-1000+ Low Pass Filter CBT N/A CBT N/A
MiniCircuits VLF-6000+ Low Pass Filter CBT N/A CBT N/A
Mini-Circuits NLP-2950+ Low Pass Filter DC to 2700 MHz CBT N/A CBT N/A
Mitutoyo CD-6"CSX Digital Caliper 4/18/2018 Biennial 4/18/2020 13264165
Narda 4772-3 Attenuator (3dB) CBT N/A CBT 9406
Narda BW-S3W2 Attenuator (3dB) CBT N/A CBT 120
Pasternack PE2209-10 Bidirectional Coupler CBT N/A CBT N/A
Pasternack PE5011-1 Torque Wrench 7/19/2017 Biennial 7/19/2019 N/A
Pasternack PE5011-1 Torque Wrench 7/19/2017 Biennial 7/19/2019 N/A
SPEAG DAK-12 Dielectric Assessment Kit (10MHz - 3GHz) 11/13/2018 Annual 11/13/2019 1121
SPEAG DAK-3.5 Dielectric Assessment Kit 5/7/2019 Annual 5/7/2020 1070
SPEAG DAKS-3.5 Portable DAK 9/11/2018 Annual 9/11/2019 1045
SPEAG D2450V2 2450 MHz SAR Dipole 11/12/2018 Annual 11/12/2019 921
SPEAG D5GHzV2 SAR Dipole 9/13/2018 Annual 9/13/2019 1163
SPEAG DAE4 Dasy Data Acquisition Electronics 1/15/2019 Annual 1/15/2020 793
SPEAG EX3DV4 SAR Probe 1/28/2019 Annual 1/28/2020 3837
Note: CBT (Calibrated Before Testing). Prior to testing, the measurement paths containing a cable, amplifier, attenuator, coupler or filter were
connected to a calibrated source (i.e. a signal generator) to determine the losses of the measurement path. The power meter offset was then
adjusted to compensate for the measurement system losses. This level offset is stored within the power meter before measurements are
made. This calibration verification procedure applies to the system verification and output power measurements. The calibrated reading is
then taken directly from the power meter after compensation of the losses for all final power measurements. Each equipment item was used
solely within its respective calibration period.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 36 of 40
02/15/2019
13 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES
a c d e= f g h= i= k
f(d,k) c x f/e c x g/e
Tol . Prob. ci ci 1g m 10g ms
Unc e rt a i nt y Compone nt (± %) Di st . Di v . 1g m 10 g ms ui ui vi
(± %) (± %)
Measurement System
Probe Calibration 6.55 N 1 1.0 1.0 6.6 6.6 ∞

Axial Isotropy 0.25 N 1 0.7 0.7 0.2 0.2 ∞
Hemishperical Isotropy 1.3 N 1 0.7 0.7 0.9 0.9 ∞
Boundary Effect 2.0 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 1.2 1.2 ∞
Linearity 0.3 N 1 1.0 1.0 0.3 0.3 ∞
System Detection Limits 0.25 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 ∞
Readout Electronics 0.3 N 1 1.0 1.0 0.3 0.3 ∞
Response Time 0.8 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 ∞
Integration Time 2.6 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 1.5 1.5 ∞
RF Ambient Conditions - Noise 3.0 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.7 ∞
RF Ambient Conditions - Reflections 3.0 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.7 ∞
Probe Positioner Mechanical Tolerance 0.4 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 0.2 0.2 ∞
Probe Positioning w/ respect to Phantom 6.7 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 3.9 3.9 ∞
Extrapolation, Interpolation & Integration algorithms for
4.0 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 2.3 2.3 ∞
Max. SAR Evaluation
Test Sample Related
Test Sample Positioning 2.7 N 1 1.0 1.0 2.7 2.7 35

Device Holder Uncertainty 1.67 N 1 1.0 1.0 1.7 1.7 5
Output Power Variation - SAR drift measurement 5.0 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 2.9 2.9 ∞
SAR Scaling 0.0 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 ∞
Phantom & Tissue Parameters
Phantom Uncertainty (Shape & Thickness tolerances) 7.6 R 1.73 1.0 1.0 4.4 4.4 ∞
Liquid Conductivity - measurement uncertainty 4.2 N 1 0.78 0.71 3.3 3.0 10

Liquid Permittivity - measurement uncertainty 4.1 N 1 0.23 0.26 1.0 1.1 10
Liquid Conductivity - Temperature Uncertainty 3.4 R 1.73 0.78 0.71 1.5 1.4 ∞
Liquid Permittivity - Temperature Unceritainty 0.6 R 1.73 0.23 0.26 0.1 0.1 ∞
Liquid Conductivity - deviation from target values 5.0 R 1.73 0.64 0.43 1.8 1.2 ∞
Liquid Permittivity - deviation from target values 5.0 R 1.73 0.60 0.49 1.7 1.4 ∞
Combined Standard Uncertainty (k=1) RSS 11.5 11.3 60
Expanded Uncertainty k=2 23.0 22.6
(95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL)
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 37 of 40
02/15/2019
14 CONCLUSION
14.1 Measurement Conclusion

The SAR evaluation indicates that the EUT complies with the RF radiation exposure limits of the FCC and
Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada, with respect to all parameters subject to this test.
These measurements were taken to simulate the RF effects of RF exposure under worst-case conditions. Precise
laboratory measures were taken to assure repeatability of the tests. The results and statements relate only to the
item(s) tested.
Please note that the absorption and distribution of electromagnetic energy in the body are very complex
phenomena that depend on the mass, shape, and size of the body, the orientation of the body with respect to the
field vectors, and the electrical properties of both the body and the environment. Other variables that may play a
substantial role in possible biological effects are those that characterize the environment (e.g. ambient
temperature, air velocity, relative humidity, and body insulation) and those that characterize the individual (e.g.
age, gender, activity level, debilitation, or disease). Because various factors may interact with one another to vary
the specific biological outcome of an exposure to electromagnetic fields, any protection guide should consider
maximal amplification of biological effects as a result of field-body interactions, environmental conditions, and
physiological variables. [3]
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 38 of 40
02/15/2019
15 REFERENCES
[1] Federal Communications Commission, ET Docket 93-62, Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of
Radiofrequency Radiation, Aug. 1996.
[2] ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2005, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency
electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, 2006.
[3] ANSI/IEEE C95.1-1992, American National Standard safety levels with respect to human exposure to radio frequency
electromagnetic fields, 3kHz to 300GHz, New York: IEEE, Sept. 1992.
[4] ANSI/IEEE C95.3-2002, IEEE Recommended Practice for the Measurement of Potentially Hazardous Electromagnetic
Fields - RF and Microwave, New York: IEEE, December 2002.
[5] IEEE Standards Coordinating Committee 39 –Standards Coordinating Committee 34 – IEEE Std. 1528-2013, IEEE
Recommended Practice for Determining the Peak Spatial-Average Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) in the Human Head
from Wireless Communications Devices: Measurement Techniques.
[6] NCRP, National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for
RadioFrequency Electromagnetic Fields, NCRP Report No. 86, 1986. Reprinted Feb. 1995.
[7] T. Schmid, O. Egger, N. Kuster, Automated E-field scanning system for dosimetric assessments, IEEE Transaction on
Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44, Jan. 1996, pp. 105-113.
[8] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, N. Kuster, Robust setup for precise calibration of E-field probes in tissue simulating liquids at
mobile communications frequencies, ICECOM97, Oct. 1997, pp. 1 -124.
[9] K. Pokovic, T. Schmid, and N. Kuster, E-field Probe with improved isotropy in brain simulating liquids, Proceedings of the
ELMAR, Zadar, Croatia, June 23-25, 1996, pp. 172-175.
[10] Schmid & Partner Engineering AG, Application Note: Data Storage and Evaluation, June 1998, p2.
[11] V. Hombach, K. Meier, M. Burkhardt, E. Kuhn, N. Kuster, The Dependence of EM Energy Absorption upon Human
Modeling at 900 MHz, IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 44 no. 10, Oct. 1996, pp. 1865-
1873.
[12] N. Kuster and Q. Balzano, Energy absorption mechanism by biological bodies in the near field of dipole antennas above
300MHz, IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, Feb. 1992, pp. 17-23.
[13] G. Hartsgrove, A. Kraszewski, A. Surowiec, Simulated Biological Materials for Electromagnetic Radiation Absorption
Studies, University of Ottawa, Bioelectromagnetics, Canada: 1987, pp. 29-36.
[14] Q. Balzano, O. Garay, T. Manning Jr., Electromagnetic Energy Exposure of Simulated Users of Portable Cellular
Telephones, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 44, no.3, Aug. 1995.
[15] W. Gander, Computermathematick, Birkhaeuser, Basel, 1992.
[16] W.H. Press, S.A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B.P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C, The Art of Scientific
Computing, Second edition, Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[17] N. Kuster, R. Kastle, T. Schmid, Dosimetric evaluation of mobile communications equipment with known precision, IEEE
Transaction on Communications, vol. E80-B, no. 5, May 1997, pp. 645-652.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 39 of 40
02/15/2019
[18] CENELEC CLC/SC111B, European Prestandard (prENV 50166-2), Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields High-
frequency: 10kHz-300GHz, Jan. 1995.
[19] Prof. Dr. Niels Kuster, ETH, Eidgenössische Technische Hoschschule Zürich, Dosimetric Evaluation of the Cellular
Phone.
[20] IEC 62209-1, Measurement procedure for the assessment of specific absorption rate of human exposure to radio
frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication devices - Part 1: Devices used next to the
ear (Frequency range of 300 MHz to 6 GHz), July 2016.
[21] Innovation, Science, Economic Development Canada RSS-102 Radio Frequency Exposure Compliance of
Radiocommunication Apparatus (All Frequency Bands) Issue 5, March 2015.
[22] Health Canada Safety Code 6 Limits of Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields in the Frequency
Range from 3 kHz – 300 GHz, 2015
[23] FCC SAR Test Procedures for 2G-3G Devices, Mobile Hotspot and UMPC Devices KDB Publications 941225, D01-D07
[24] SAR Measurement Guidance for IEEE 802.11 Transmitters, KDB Publication 248227 D01
[25] FCC SAR Considerations for Handsets with Multiple Transmitters and Antennas, KDB Publications 648474 D03-D04
[26] FCC SAR Evaluation Considerations for Laptop, Notebook, Netbook and Tablet Computers, FCC KDB Publication
616217 D04
[27] FCC SAR Measurement and Reporting Requirements for 100MHz – 6 GHz, KDB Publications 865664 D01-D02
[28] FCC General RF Exposure Guidance and SAR Procedures for Dongles, KDB Publication 447498, D01-D02
[29] Anexo à Resolução No. 533, de 10 de Septembro de 2009.
[30] IEC 62209-2, Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and body-mounted wireless communication
devices - Human models, instrumentation, and procedures - Part 2: Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate
(SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6
GHz), Mar. 2010.
Approved by:
Quality Manager

Page 40 of 40
02/15/2019
APPENDIX A: SAR TEST DATA
© 2019 PCTEST Engineering Laboratory, Inc.

DUT: BCGA2197; Type: Tablet Device; Serial: F9FYL02VMLWC
Communication System: UID 0, _IEEE 802.11b; Frequency: 2437 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: 2400 MHz Body Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2437 MHz; σ = 1.984 S/m; εr = 51.117; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
Phantom section: Flat Section; Space: 0.0 cm
Test Date: 06-04-2019; Ambient Temp: 21.9°C; Tissue Temp: 20.4°C
Probe: EX3DV4 - SN7420; ConvF(7.34, 7.34, 7.34) @ 2437 MHz; Calibrated: 9/18/2018
Sensor-Surface: 1.4mm (Mechanical Surface Detection)
Electronics: DAE4 Sn1449; Calibrated: 11/12/2018
Phantom: Twin-SAM V4.0; Type: QD 000 P40 CC; Serial: 1596
Measurement SW: DASY52, Version 52.10 (2);SEMCAD X Version 14.6.12 (7450)
Mode: IEEE 802.11b, 22 MHz Bandwidth, Body SAR, Ch 6, 1 Mbps

Bottom Edge, Variant 2, Antenna A
Area Scan (11x19x1): Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=12mm

Zoom Scan (7x7x7): Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 23.28 V/m; Power Drift = 0.00 dB
Peak SAR (extrapolated) = 2.51 W/kg
SAR(1 g) = 0.815 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.264 W/kg
A1
DUT: BCGA2197; Type: Tablet Device; Serial: F9FYL032MLWC
Communication System: UID 0, _IEEE 802.11n; Frequency: 5270 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: 5 GHz Body Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 5270 MHz; σ = 5.407 S/m; εr = 46.764; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
Phantom: Twin-SAM V4.0; Type: QD 000 P40 CA; Serial: 1275
Mode: IEEE 802.11n, U-NII-2A, 40 MHz Bandwidth, Body SAR, Ch 54,

13.5 Mbps, Bottom Edge, Variant 1, Antenna A

Zoom Scan (8x8x7): Measurement grid: dx=4mm, dy=4mm, dz=1.4mm; Graded Ratio: 1.4
Reference Value = 14.34 V/m; Power Drift = -0.19 dB
SAR(1 g) = 1.02 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.330 W/kg
A2
DUT: BCGA2197; Type: Tablet Device; Serial: F9FYL02ZMLWC
Communication System: UID 0, Bluetooth; Frequency: 2441 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1.292
Medium: 2400 MHz Body Medium parameters used (interpolated):
f = 2441 MHz; σ = 2.011 S/m; εr = 51.797; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
Phantom: SAM Sub; Type: SAM 4.0; Serial: TP-1403
Mode: Bluetooth, Body SAR, Ch 39, 1 Mbps,

Bottom Edge, Variant 1, Antenna A

Zoom Scan (7x7x7): Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
Reference Value = 19.20 V/m; Power Drift = -0.04 dB
SAR(1 g) = 0.726 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 0.242 W/kg
A3
APPENDIX B: SYSTEM VERIFICATION

DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 921
Communication System: UID 0, CW; Frequency: 2450 MHz; Duty Cycle: 1:1
Medium: 2400 MHz Body Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; σ = 2.019 S/m; εr = 51.784; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
Phantom: SAM Sub; Type: SAM 4.0; Serial: TP-1403
2450 MHz System Verification at 20.0 dBm (100 mW)

Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
SAR(1 g) = 5.24 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 2.35 W/kg
Deviation(1 g) = 3.15%
0 dB = 8.69 W/kg = 9.39 dBW/kg
B1
DUT: Dipole 2450 MHz; Type: D2450V2; Serial: 921
Medium: 2400 MHz Body Medium parameters used:
f = 2450 MHz; σ = 1.996 S/m; εr = 51.099; ρ = 1000 kg/m3
Phantom: Twin-SAM V4.0; Type: QD 000 P40 CC; Serial: 1596

Zoom Scan (7x7x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=5mm, dy=5mm, dz=5mm
SAR(1 g) = 5.26 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 2.43 W/kg
0 dB = 8.95 W/kg = 9.52 dBW/kg
B2
DUT: Dipole 5 GHz; Type: D5GHzV2; Serial: 1163
f = 5250 MHz; σ = 5.382 S/m; εr = 46.785; ρ = 1000 kg/m3

Zoom Scan (8x8x7)/Cube 0: Measurement grid: dx=4mm, dy=4mm, dz=1.4mm; Graded Ratio: 1.4
SAR(1 g) = 3.8 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 1.04 W/kg
Deviation(1 g) = -2.19%
0 dB = 8.92 W/kg = 9.50 dBW/kg
B3
Medium: 5 GHz Body Medium parameters used:
f = 5600 MHz; σ = 5.839 S/m; εr = 46.199; ρ = 1000 kg/m3

SAR(1 g) = 4.21 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 1.16 W/kg
0 dB = 10.2 W/kg = 10.09 dBW/kg
B4
f = 5750 MHz; σ = 6.038 S/m; εr = 46.005; ρ = 1000 kg/m3

SAR(1 g) = 3.66 W/kg; SAR(10 g) = 1.000 W/kg
Deviation(1 g) = -5.91%
0 dB = 9.07 W/kg = 9.58 dBW/kg
B5
APPENDIX C: PROBE CALIBRATION

APPENDIX D: SAR T ISSUE SPECIF ICAT IO N S
Measurement Procedure for Tissue verification:

1) The network analyzer and probe system was configured and calibrated.
2) The probe was immersed in the tissue. The tissue was placed in a nonmetallic container.
Trapped air bubbles beneath the flange were minimized by placing the probe at a slight angle.
3) The complex admittance with respect to the probe aperture was measured
4) The complex relative permittivity ε’ can be calculated from the below equation (Pournaropoulos
and Misra):
j 2 r  0 b b  
exp − jr (  0 r'  0 )1 / 2 
Y=
ln (b a )2   
a a 0
cos 
r
d d d
where Y is the admittance of the probe in contact with the sample, the primed and unprimed coordinates refer to
source and observation points, respectively, r 2 =  2 +  2 − 2  cos  ,  is the angular frequency, and j = −1 .
Table D-I
Composition of the Tissue Equivalent Matter
Frequency (MHz) 2450 5200 - 5800
Tissue Body Body

DGBE 26.7
NaCl 0.1 See page 2
Water 73.2
Approved by:
Quality Manager
Test Dates: DUT Type: APPENDIX D:
05/20/2019-06/04/2019 Tablet Device Page 1 of 2
02/15/2019
Figure D-1
Composition of 3.5 – 5 GHz Body Tissue Equivalent Matter
Note: 3.5 – 5 GHz Body liquid recipes are proprietary SPEAG. Since the composition is approximate to the actual
liquids utilized, the manufacturer tissue-equivalent liquid data sheets are provided below.
Figure D-2
3.5 – 5 GHz Body Tissue Equivalent Matter
Approved by:
Quality Manager
Test Dates: DUT Type: APPENDIX D:
02/15/2019
APPENDIX E: SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION
Per FCC KDB Publication 865664 D02v01r02, SAR system validation status should be documented to confirm
measurement accuracy. The SAR systems (including SAR probes, system components and software versions)
used for this device were validated against its performance specifications prior to the SAR measurements.
Reference dipoles were used with the required tissue- equivalent media for system validation, according to the
procedures outlined in FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04 and IEEE 1528-2013. Since SAR probe
calibrations are frequency dependent, each probe calibration point was validated at a frequency within the valid
frequency range of the probe calibration point, using the system that normally operates with the probe for routine
SAR measurements and according to the required tissue-equivalent media.
A tabulated summary of the system validation status including the validation date(s), measurement frequencies,
SAR probes and tissue dielectric parameters has been included.
Table E-1
SAR System Validation Summary – 1g
SAR COND. PERM. CW VALIDATION MOD. VALIDATION
FREQ. PROBE PROBE
SYSTEM DATE PROBE CAL. POINT PROBE PROBE MOD. DUTY
[MHz] SN TYPE (σ) (εr) SENSITIVITY PAR
# LINEARITY ISOTROPY TYPE FACTOR
AM7 2450 4/2/2019 3837 EX3DV4 2450 Body 2.026 50.280 PASS PASS PASS OFDM/TDD PASS PASS
AM3 2450 12/10/2018 7420 EX3DV4 2450 Body 2.044 51.289 PASS PASS PASS OFDM/TDD PASS PASS
AM2 5250 11/13/2018 7416 EX3DV4 5250 Body 5.514 48.030 PASS PASS PASS OFDM N/A PASS
NOTE: While the probes have been calibrated for both CW and modulated signals, all measurements were
performed using communication systems calibrated for CW signals only. Modulations in the table above represent
test configurations for which the measurement system has been validated per FCC KDB Publication 865664
D01v01r04 for scenarios when CW probe calibrations are used with other signal types. SAR systems were
validated for modulated signals with a periodic duty cycle, such as GMSK, or with a high peak to average ratio (>5
dB), such as OFDM according to FCC KDB Publication 865664 D01v01r04.
Approved by:
Quality Manager
Test Dates: DUT Type: APPENDIX E:
02/15/2019

RF Exposure Info 4423884

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

RF Exposure Info 4423884

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

RF Exposure Info 4423884

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

PCTEST ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.

18855 Adams Ct, Morgan Hill, CA 95037 USA

SAR EVALUATION REPORT

Applicant Name: Date of Testing:

AP PL IC ANT : APPL E, INC.

DUT Type: Tablet Device

DTS 2.4 GHz WLAN 2412 - 2472 MHz 0.96

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

1 DEVICE UNDER TEST ........................................................................................................................... 3

3 DOSIMETRIC ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................. 9

4 TEST CONFIGURATION POSITIONS .................................................................................................. 10

5 RF EXPOSURE LIMITS ........................................................................................................................ 11

6 FCC MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES................................................................................................. 12

7 RF CONDUCTED POWERS ................................................................................................................. 15

8 SYSTEM VERIFICATION ...................................................................................................................... 26

9 SAR DATA SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... 28

10 FCC MULTI-TX AND ANTENNA SAR CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................... 32

11 SAR MEASUREMENT VARIABILITY .................................................................................................... 35

12 EQUIPMENT LIST ................................................................................................................................ 36

13 MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTIES ..................................................................................................... 37

APPENDIX A: SAR TEST PLOTS

APPENDIX E: SAR SYSTEM VALIDATION

APPENDIX F: DUT ANTENNA DIAGRAM & SAR TEST SETUP PHOTOGRAPHS

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

1.1 Device Overview

Band & Mode Operating Modes Tx Frequency

2.4 GHz WLAN Voice/Data 2412 - 2472 MHz

1.2 Power Reduction for SAR

1.3 Nominal and Maximum Output Power Specifications

1.3.1 Maximum Output Power

Modulated Average - Single Tx Chain

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

Modulated Average - MIMO

Modulated Average - Single Tx Chain

Bluetooth BDR Maximum 17.0

Modulated Average - Single Tx Chain

Modulated Average - Single Tx Chain

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

Modulated Average - MIMO

20 MHz Bandwidth 40 MHz Bandwidth 80 MHz Bandwidth

1.3.2 Reduced Output Power

1.4 DUT Antenna Locations

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

1.6 Miscellaneous SAR Test Considerations

This device supports IEEE 802.11ac with the following features:

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

1.8 Device Serial Numbers

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

2.1 SAR Definition

SAR is expressed in units of Watts per Kilogram (W/kg).

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

3.1 Measurement Procedure

*Also compliant to IEEE 1528-2013 Table 6

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

4.1 Device Holder

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

5.1 Uncontrolled Environment

5.2 Controlled Environment

Document S/N: Test Dates: DUT Type:

6.1 Measured and Reported SAR