Unit 1 The Companies Act, 2013
Unit 1 The Companies Act, 2013
Unit 1 The Companies Act, 2013
QUALIFICATION
President of NCLT: a person who is or has been a judge of a high court for five years.
Judicial member:
1) is, or has been, a judge of a high court;
2) is, or has been, a district judge for at least 5 years,
3) has, for at least 10 years, been an advocate of a court.
Technical member:
1) has, for at least 15 years been a member of the Indian corporate law service or Indian legal
service and has been holding the rank of secretary or additional secretary to the government
of India;
2) is, or has been in practise as a chartered accountant for at least 15 years;
3) is, or has been in practise as a cost accountant for at least 15 years;
4) is, or has been in practise as a company secretary for at least 15 years;
5) is a person of proven ability, integrity and standing having special knowledge and experience
of not less than 15 years, in law, industrial finance, industrial management, investment,
accountancy or such other disciplines related to management.
SELECTION
The president of the tribunal shall be appointed by the Central Government after consultation with
the CJI, and the members of the tribunal shall be appointed on the recommendation of a selection
committee.
The selection committee shall now comprise only of four members namely, CJI or his nominee; a
Senior Judge of the Supreme Court or a Chief Justice of High court; Secretary in the MCA;
and Secretary in the Ministry of Law and Justice.
In case of equality of votes in a meeting of the selection committee the chairperson (CJI) shall have a
casting vote.
TERM OF OFFICE
The president and members of NCLT shall be appointed for a term of 5 years but will be eligible for
reappointment for another term of 5 years.
A member of the tribunal should not be less than 50 years of age and shall hold office in the case of
the President till he attains the age of 67 years and in the case of any other member till he attains
the age of 65 years.
BENCHES OF TRIBUNAL:
The benches to be constituted by the president of the tribunal will comprise of 2 members out of
which one shall be a judicial member and the other shall be a technical member.
The principal bench is located at New Delhi and it is presided over by the President of the
Tribunal.
Every bench or special bench shall be presided over by a judicial member.
ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL
The Tribunal may, after giving the parties an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders as it thinks
fit. It can also, at any time within two years from the date of the order, rectify any mistake and make
amendment in the order passed by it if the mistake is brought to its notice by the parties.
The term body corporate is much wider in concept than the word company because it includes:
1) Companies formed and registered under the Companies Act of 2013.
2) Companies incorporated outside India.
3) Corporations formed under special act of Parliament or of foreign country.
4) Public financial institutions.
5) Nationalised banks under Banking Companies Act, 1970.
6) LLP registered under the LLP Act 2008.
7) LLP incorporated outside India.
2) Independent corporate existence: The separate legal entity of a company forms the bedrock of the
company law. Being a mere creation of law, it possesses only those properties which the charter of its
creation confers upon it. The company is a person different altogether from the subscribers to the
MOA. Its personality is distinct and separate from the personality of those who compose it. This is
known as the corporate veil. Since the company is separate and distinct from its members it can:
a) Sue and be sued in its own name,
b) Own, enjoy and transfer property in its own name,
c) The company’s creditors are the creditors of the company alone and cannot proceed against
any of its members,
d) No member has any rights in the assets owned by the company during its existence or on its
winding up.
Salomon v. Salomon & Co.
S incorporated a company and sold his business to it for 39,000 pounds. The company comprised of
himself, his wife, his daughter and his four sons. The purchase consideration was paid to him by
payment of 9000 in cash, 20,000 shares and 10,000 debentures. The debentures had a floating charge
over the assets of the company in general. One year later the company became insolvent and was
wound up. The unsecured creditors claimed priority of payment saying that Salomon & Co. was one
and the same thing as Salomon. It was held that the existence of a company is quite independent and
distinct from its members and the company’s assets must be first applied to payback Salomon who
was a secured debenture holder.
Abdul Haque v. Das Mal
The plaintiff sued for wages the Secretary and Managing Director of the company, and not the
company itself. It was held that, since the company was a separate entity from its members, the suit
to recover salary or wages due from a company lies against the company and not against the
directors or members of the company.
Lee v. Lee Air Farming Limited
Lee held £2999 worth of share capital of the £3000 share capital of Lee Air Farming Ltd. He was the
managing director and chief pilot of the company appointed on a salary. Lee died in an air crash. His
widow claimed compensation for the death of her husband in the course of employment. It was held
that Lee was a separate person from the company he formed and compensation was payable.
People’s Pleasure Park v. Rohelder
The Articles of a company contained a clause that the title to the land should never pass to coloured
persons. The land was sold to a company comprising exclusively of negroes. The vendor called for
the annulment of the transfer. It was held that the corporation was distinct from its members and that
the transfer was valid.
3) Separate property: A company is capable of owning enjoying and disposing of property in its own
name. The shareholders are not the private or joint owners of the company’s property. A member
does not even have an insurable interest in the property of the company.
Macaura v. Northern Assurance Co. Limited
M was the holder of nearly all shares of a timber company. He was also a major creditor. M insured
the company’s timber in his own name. The timber was lost in a fire. M claimed insurance
compensation. It was held that the insurance company was not liable to him as no shareholder has
any right to any item of property owned by the company for, he has no legal or equitable interest in
them.
4) Perpetual succession: It is an artificial person created by law. Law alone can bring an end to its life.
Its existence is not affected by the death or insolvency of its members. Members may come and
members may go, but the company continues its operations unless it is wound up.
5) Artificial legal person: Company is a person created by a process other than natural birth. Its
existence as a person is obtained through the process of incorporation. It is known as artificial
juridical personality.
6) Limited liability: The liability of its members is limited to the unpaid amount on the shares that they
are holding plus the premium they had agreed to pay. If the company is a company limited by
guarantee, then the liability of the members extends to the amount each one has guaranteed to pay in
the event of the winding up of the company.
Section 3A: If at any time the number of members of a company is reduced below the minimum
prescribed (below 7 for public and below 2 for private), and the company carries on business for
more than 6 months while the number of members is so reduced, then every person who is a member
of the company during that time shall be severely liable for the payment of the whole debts of the
company contracted after those 6 months and may be severally sued, provided he was aware of the
reduced membership.
7) Transferability of shares: Shares, debentures or other interest of any member in a company shall be
movable property, transferable in the manner provided for, by the Articles of the company. In the
case of private companies, certain restrictions are placed on the right of its members to transfer
shares.
8) Common seal: Common seal is the official signature of a company, which is affixed by the officers
and employees of the company on its every document. The Companies (Amendment) Act, 2015 has
made the common seal optional. In case a company does not have a common seal, the authorization
shall be made by two directors or by a director and the Company Secretary, wherever the company
has appointed a Company Secretary.
STATUTORY PROVISIONS: the separate entity of the company remains, but directors and members are
held personally liable for the acts of the company.
1) Membership falling below statutory minimum: Section 3A If at any time the number of members
of a company is reduced below the minimum prescribed (below 7 for public and below 2 for private),
and the company carries on business for more than 6 months while the number of members is so
reduced, then every person who is a member of the company during that time shall be severely liable
for the payment of the whole debts of the company contracted after those 6 months and may be
severally sued, provided he was aware of the reduced membership.
2) Misrepresentation in prospectus: Every promoter, director or any other person who authorises the
issue of such a prospectus shall be liable to the investors who bought the shares on the faith of the
untrue statement under Section 35. These persons shall also be criminally liable under Section 34
and punishable under Section 447.
3) Failure to return application money: The money should be repaid within 15 days of the close of
the issue and if the amount is not repaid, then directors will be jointly and severely liable to pay the
money along with the interest, at the rate of 15% p.a.
4) For facilitating the task of an inspector appointed: To investigate the affairs of a company, for
alleged fraud, oppression or mismanagement.
5) Investigation of ownership of company: To find out the identity of the people who are financially
controlling the company.
6) Fraudulent conduct of business: If it appears that at any time of the business, the company has
been carried on with intent to defraud creditors or any other person, or for any fraudulent purpose,
those who were knowingly part to such conduct of business may be made personally liable for all or
any of the debts of the company.
7) Directors with unlimited liability: When the directors, through a written agreement, agree to have
their liability made unlimited, they become personally liable for all the debts of the company.
8) Liability of promoters for pre incorporation contracts: Promoters remain liable on those contracts
which are not adopted by the company after its incorporation.
9) Ultravires acts: Directors are personally liable for all acts which are ultravires the Company, the
Directors and those in the nature of Torts.
JUDICIAL INTERPRETATIONS: The separate entity of the company is ignored, and the façade of the
corporate personality is removed to identify the persons who are really guilty.
1) For determination of the character of the company:
Daimler Co. Ltd. v. Continental Tyre and Rubber, Co.
A company was incorporated in London for the purpose of selling tyres manufactured in Germany,
by a German company. On declaration of war between England and Germany, it was held that since
both the decision-making bodies were German, the company was a German company and hence an
enemy company. The veil was lifted because there was danger to public interest.
2) For the benefit of revenue: The court will ignore the separate entity of the company if it is formed
solely for the purpose of evading income tax.
Sir Dinshaw Maneckjee Petit
Dinshaw formed 4 private companies and transferred his investments to each of these companies in
exchange for their shares. The dividend and interest income received by the company was handed
back to Sir Dinshaw as a pretended loan. It was held that the company was formed purely and simply
as a means of avoiding tax and the company was nothing more than Dinshaw himself.
3) Fraud or improper conduct: The court will refuse to uphold the separate existence of the company
where it seems to have been formed to defeat or circumvent law, to defraud creditors or to avoid
legal obligations.
Gilford Motor Co. v. Horne
Horne was employed on the condition that he would not solicit customers of the company or
compete with for certain period of time after leaving employment. On leaving employment he
formed a company consisting of his wife and an employee of the company, and started carrying on
competing business. His company sent out circular to the customers of his former employer to solicit
them. An injunction was granted against Horne and his company, restraining them from soliciting the
plaintiff’s customers.
Jones v. Lipman
Lipman had a contract to sell his land to Jones. He subsequently changed his mind and sold the land
to a company which he formed consisting of himself and the clerk of his solicitor for a nominal
capital of 100 pounds. Jones sued Lipman for specific performance.
4) To avoid a welfare legislation: If a subsidiary is formed to avoid a welfare legislation, it may lose
its individuality in favour of its holding company.
5) Formation of subsidiaries to act as agents: Even though a parent and its subsidiary are distinct
legal entities, it may lose its individuality in favour of its parent company if the subsidiary is formed
to circumvent law. The principle will be held liable for the acts of that company.
6) Where the company is a sham or cloak
7) Where the company is used for some illegal or improper purpose
8) In case of economic offences: A court is entitled to lift the veil of corporate entity and pay regard to
the economic realities behind the legal façade.
9) For determination of technical competence of the company: In respect of joint venture
companies, the experience of the companies would include the experience of the constituents of the
joint venture as well. Therefore, lifting of the corporate veil is necessary for the purpose of
considering whether a company has the requisite experience as required by the tender document.
Revocation of Licence: If any company contravenes any requirements of this section or any
conditions subject to which the licence has been granted, or if the affairs of the company are
conducted fraudulently or in a manner prejudicial to public interest or are violative of the objects of
the company then the central government, may by order, after giving it a reasonable opportunity of
being heard,
1) Revoke the licence and direct it to convert its status and change its name by adding the
word limited/private limited as the case may be.
2) Direct the company to be wound up under this act if it is satisfied that it is essential to
do so in Public Interest.
3) Direct the company to be amalgamated with another company registered under this
section and having similar objects, so as to form a single company, if it is satisfied that it
is essential to do so in public interest.
The following must be delivered to the Registrar by foreign companies within 30 days of establishing the
place of business:
1) A certified copy of the charter, statutes, or memorandum and articles of the company.
2) The full address of the registered or principal office of the company.
3) A list of the directors and secretary of the company containing his name in full, usual
residential address, nationality of origin, business and particulars of other directorships held
by him.
4) The names and addresses of persons resident in India, authorised to accept on behalf of the
company notices or other documents served.
5) The full address of the office in India which is deemed to be its principal place of business in
India.
6) Declaration that none of the directors of the company have ever been convicted or debarred
from formation of companies and management in India or abroad.
7) Any other information as may be prescribed.
Penalties:
Where a foreign company fails to comply with any of the provisions relating to companies
incorporated outside India, the company shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than Rs
1 lakh but may extend 3 lakhs with an additional fine of Rs 50,000 for every day during which the
contravention continues.
Every officer of the company who is in default shall be punishable with a fine ranging from Rs
25,000 to 5 lakhs.
Liable to be sued in respect of any contract, or transaction it may have entered into, but cannot
institute any legal proceedings in respect of any such contracts, till it has complied with the relevant
provisions of the Act.