Source 1:

The data provided was sourced from the "What are Human Rights? " section of the OHCHR
(Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights) website.The source aims to
inform us on the idea of human rights by highlighting the reality that everyone has these rights,
regardless of their gender, nationality, or religion. It also emphasises how important the
International Bill of Human Rights and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) are
to defending and advancing human rights around the world.The definition of human rights, their
universality, the function of the UDHR, and the International Bill of Human Rights are all
addressed in the source. It covers the essential rights mentioned in the UDHR, the significance
of allowing people to stand up for their rights, and the UN Human Rights Office's worldwide
initiatives to advance and defend human rights.The source offers insightful details on the basic
idea of human rights, the UDHR's historical context, and the UN's continuous efforts to protect
human rights around the world. It is an educational resource for anyone who wants to learn
about the basis and importance of human rights.Although the website provides a thorough
overview of human rights and the UN's efforts in this area, it might not provide a detailed review
of particular human rights challenges or current advancements in the area. It may be necessary
for people to check additional sources if they are seeking in-depth information on specific
human rights violations or current problems.

Source 2:

On April 1, 2024, the Universal Rights Organisation published the source "How the Global South
Shaped the International Human Rights System" online. It explores the crucial role that the
worldwide South's nations played in influencing the UN's extensive debate on the creation of a
worldwide human rights regime between 1963 and 1968. The source seeks to invalidate the
common belief that the West was the only force behind the creation of the international human
rights framework by highlighting the major contributions made by Global South nations. It seeks
to illuminate the historical development of the UN human rights system, highlighting how crucial
it is to acknowledge and value the histories that have been overlooked in order to guide future
developments in the global human rights framework.This source is valuable because it offers a
critical viewpoint on how the international human rights system has evolved historically, with an
emphasis on the contributions of the Global South. It challenges conventional narratives and
promotes a more inclusive and thorough approach to human rights conversations while
providing insights into the complicated structure and dynamics of the UN human rights
system.The source's emphasis on a narrow historical period (1963–1968) and the requirement
for a more thorough examination of the current ramifications of the Global South's influence on
the development of the international human rights system could be considered limitations.
Furthermore, even when the source stresses how important it is to acknowledge history that
have been forgotten, it could not go into great detail on the precise policy ramifications or doable
suggestions for improving human rights based on this historical awareness.
Source 3:

The source "Chapter 15: The Global North: Introducing the Region" is an excerpt from a book
that focuses on the US, Canada, and Belgium and discusses gendered experiences in the
Global North. It addresses how the Global North and South division has historically been
constructed, bringing forth the complex connections among genders in strong, developed
nations. Examining the gendered experiences of men and women in the Global North especially
in the US, Canada, and Belgium—is the purpose of this source. It seeks to expose the
social-historical structures that influence power relations and people's lives in these areas, as
well as denaturalize value-laden gender distinctions. The source's content addresses the
gendered realities of people living in the Global North by presenting anthropological studies that
examine gender difficulties in civilisations characterised by wealth and power. It talks about how
the Global North and South were divided historically, highlighting how different and stratified the
societies in the Global North are. This source is valuable because it illuminates the historical
roots of the Global North and South divide and offers insights into gender dynamics inside
wealthy and powerful nations. It advances knowledge of the social-historical structures that
shape gender norms and have an effect on the lives of men, women, and groups of sexual
minorities in these areas. A limitation of this source could be its concentration on particular
Global North nations (the United States, Canada, and Belgium), which could restrict the
applicability of its conclusions to other areas falling under this group. Furthermore, although the
source discusses the variety of issues surrounding gender, it might not go into great detail on
other intersecting elements like race, ethnicity, or class that are also important in defining
experiences in the Global North.

Source 4:

The Amnesty International website first published the source "Forced evictions at industrial
cobalt and copper mines in the DRC" on March 30, 2024. It explains in detail the violations of
human rights brought about by the growth of large-scale cobalt and copper mines in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo, including forced evictions, sexual assault, and arson. This
source purpose is to raise awareness of the serious human rights abuses taking place in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo as a result of the growth of international mining companies
that are extracting copper and cobalt for lithium-ion batteries. It seeks to bring attention to the
mistreatment and forced relocation that communities endure as a result of mining operations,
highlighting the urgency of putting an end to these violations and guaranteeing a fair shift in the
world economy. The source's content emphasises how the DRC's growing cobalt and copper
mining operations have resulted in forced evictions, sexual assaults, and other violations of
human rights. It highlights the significance of upholding the rights of communities impacted by
mining operations while discussing the substantial historical and contemporary exploitation and
abuse that the people of the Democratic Republic of Congo have endured.This source is
valuable because it offers a thorough description of the violations of human rights brought about
by the DRC's large-scale cobalt and copper mining. It provides information about the difficulties
that local people encounter, the social and environmental effects of mining operations, and the
pressing need to solve these infractions in order to guarantee a fair transition in the world
economy.This source's emphasis on particular instances and situations of violations of human
rights without offering a more comprehensive examination of the structural problems with the
DRC mining sector could be one of its limitations. Furthermore, even though the source
emphasises how critical it is to put an end to forced evictions and human rights violations, it
might not go into great detail on the many approaches or steps required to deal with these
problems in their entirety.

Source 5:

The article "Human rights should always come before profit" was published on the Amnesty
International website on March 30, 2024. It highlights the importance of putting human rights
ahead of business interests and discusses the difficulties encountered by communities seeking
justice in the face of weak legal frameworks, informational gaps, corruption, and strong
state-corporate relations.This source purpose is to promote the idea that human rights should
take priority over profit by drawing attention to the challenges that communities confront in their
pursuit of justice and the way in which businesses take advantage of poverty without holding
themselves accountable. It demands that all businesses be legally obligated to take reasonable
steps to detect, stop, and deal with violations of human rights. The source's content addresses
how important it is for businesses to prioritise human rights and take aggressive steps to stop
and rectify violations of such rights. It talks about the difficulties communities have in obtaining
justice, how businesses take advantage of poverty, and how important it is for businesses to
comply with legal obligations to respect human rights norms.This source is valuable because it
emphasises the need for businesses to put the protection of human rights ahead of their own
interests. It draws attention to the difficulties that communities encounter in obtaining justice and
the necessity of legal frameworks that compel businesses to take proactive measures to stop
and rectify violations of human rights. A limitation of this source would be the absence of
in-depth case studies or examples that highlight the precise situations in which businesses have
put profit ahead of human rights, which could bolster the thesis put forth. Furthermore, even
when the source advocates for legal requirements for due diligence, it might not give a thorough
rundown of all the possible difficulties or objections that come with putting such standards into
place.

Source 6:
The European Parliament website released the source "MEPs push companies to mitigate their
negative social and environmental impact" on March 30, 2024. It talks about how the European
Parliament adopted a stance to negotiate regulations that incorporate environmental effect and
human rights into corporate governance, highlighting the necessity of incorporating due
diligence into corporate management. The purpose of this website aims to draw attention to the
initiatives taken by the European Parliament to compel businesses to acknowledge and lessen
the negative impacts they have on society and the environment. With a focus on problems like
child labour, slavery, pollution, and biodiversity loss, it seeks to highlight how crucial it is for
businesses to include human rights and environmental concerns into their operations.The
source's content outlines the main ideas that the European Parliament endorsed, such as the
mandate that businesses identify, stop, and lessen any adverse effects that their operations
have on the environment and human rights. It goes into how businesses must keep an eye on
and evaluate the effects of their value-chain partners as well as the procedures and controls in
place for dealing with noncompliant businesses.This source provides important details about the
European Parliament's position on corporate responsibility and the steps being taken to
guarantee that businesses give human rights and environmental conservation first priority. It
highlights the significance of responsible corporate behaviour and throws light on the legislative
initiatives to hold businesses accountable for their social and environmental impact.The lack of
thorough data on the particular implementation difficulties or possible objections to the proposed
regulations may be one of this source's limitations. Furthermore, while though the source
emphasises how crucial it is for businesses' governance to incorporate human rights and
environmental impact issues, it might not go into great detail about the real-world ramifications
or potential roadblocks that businesses might encounter when trying to comply with these laws.

Source 7:

The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), which is publishing the “2016 Human
Development Report" since 1990, is the source of this information. It provides an unbiased and
fact-based analysis of the main concerns, trends, and strategies in development.The report
purpose seeks to put an insight into human development worldwide, with a particular emphasis
on empowering individuals and creating resilient countries. In order to provide a better
knowledge of the opportunities and problems associated with human development, it seeks to
analyse and discuss important development topics, trends, and policies.The report covers a
wide range of topics related to human development, including discussions of important
development trends, challenges, and strategies. It addresses issues of empowering people,
building social resilience, and accomplishing sustainable development objectives. The study
contains debates, empirical data, and analyses of composite indices and indicators of human
growth.This report valuable because it offers an in-depth look of global concerns related to
human development and provides insight into the obstacles to and opportunities presented by
empowering people and creating resilient countries. Policymakers, scholars, and practitioners in
the field of development can use it as a useful tool to comprehend important patterns and guide
their actions. The possibility of bias or restrictions in the data sources utilised for the research
could be one of the report's limitation .Also, even though the report provides insightful
information on human development, it might not address particular regional or national nuances
that could affect how applicable its conclusions are in various circumstances.
Source 8:

The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights' official website hosts the
source "Human Rights 75 Initiative" (OHCHR). It is a component of the Human Rights 75
campaign, which aims to revitalise the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in order to
promote justice, equality, and freedom for all. This source aims to support the Human Rights 75
campaign, which aims to bring the Universal Declaration of Human Rights back to life and show
how relevant it is to today's issues. The programme seeks to promote justice, equality, and
freedom on a worldwide scale.The source's content highlights the significance of human rights
in advancing peace, development, and well-being while outlining the goals of the Human Rights
75 programme. The text examines the necessity of a robust, ethical, and unbiased human rights
framework to tackle contemporary human rights emergencies and advocates for monetary
assistance to strengthen the OHCHR's ability to react efficiently. This source provides insightful
information about the OHCHR's initiatives to advance human rights, such as the Human Rights
75 programme. It draws attention to how important human rights are to maintaining long-lasting
peace, inclusive growth, and improved wellbeing. The initiative contributes value to the global
human rights conversation by focusing on tackling new challenges and enhancing the human
rights system. The limitation of thorough information on particular tactics or activities intended to
help the Human Rights 75 project accomplish its objectives may be one of its limitations.
Furthermore, even while the source stresses the value of human rights, it does not address any
potential roadblocks or objections to the initiative's execution.

Source 9:

The source "Human Rights Abuses in the DRC" can be found on the website of the Borgen
Project, a group that fights worldwide poverty and promotes the rights of the underprivileged.
The Borgen Project seeks to promote sustainable solutions and increase public awareness of
issues related to poverty.This source aims to increase awareness of the difficulties experienced
by people in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and to shine light on violations of
human rights there. It aims to draw attention to human rights abuses, including child labour,
forced evictions, and exploitation, in order to push for reform and support programmes that deal
with these problems.The source's content addresses the different human rights violations that
happen a lot in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, like forced evictions, child labour in
mines, and other kinds of exploitation. It shows on how large-scale mining operations affect
nearby communities by describing specific cases of human rights abuses and the difficulties
experienced by those who are impacted by them.This source is valuable because it raises
awareness of the violations of human rights taking place in the Democratic Republic of the
Congo and adds to the conversation about those violations and the need for action to safeguard
vulnerable communities. The source advocates and teaches for better conditions and rights
protection in the region by bringing attention to particular instances and giving background
information on the larger problems.A possible limitation of this source would be its lack of
complete reporting or in-depth analysis of all violations of human rights in the Democratic
Republic of the Congo. Furthermore, even while the source could offer insightful information, it
might not provide specific remedies or policy recommendations to deal with the underlying
issues that lead to human rights abuses in the nation.