10 1111@tbed 13621
10 1111@tbed 13621
10 1111@tbed 13621
Attributes of HIV infection over decades (1982-2018): A systematic review and meta-analysis
1 Fellow of Tropical Health Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Egypt
2 Department of Endemic and Infectious Diseases, Alexandria Fever Hospital, Egypt
3 Department of Tropical Health, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Egypt
This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been
through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to
differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi:
10.1111/tbed.13621
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
Accepted Article
Abstract
Understanding the risk factors for HIV infection is the foundation of successful preventive strategies, which
must bundle sociocultural, behavioural and biomedical interventions to halt disease transmission. We aimed in
this study to provide a pooled estimation of HIV risk factors and trace changes across decades in order to drive
consensus and accurate assessment of disease transmission risk.
We comprehensively searched PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline, EMBASE, ScienceDirect, Ovid,
EBSCO, Google Scholar and the Egyptian Universities Library Consortium from October-December 2018.
Two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies. Funnel plots were inspected to identify
publication bias. Heterogeneity across studies was checked using the Q and I2 statistics. The results were
reported based on the pooled odds ratio (pOR) with 95% CI using a random-effects model. Meta-analysis of
HIV risk factors revealed a superior role for risky sexual practices (unprotected vaginal/anal sex), injecting
drug use (IDU), sharing needles, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), child sexual abuse, and vertical
transmissions. Trends across decades (1982 – 1999 and 2000 – 2018 respectively) showed rising evidence for
prostitution [pOR (95% CI)= 2.3 (1.12 – 4.68) vs 2.69 (1.67 – 4.32)] and men who have sex with men (MSM)
[pOR (95% CI)= 2.28 (1.64 – 3.17) vs 3.67 (1.88 – 7.17)], while transmission through IDU [pOR (95% CI)=
3.42 (2.28 – 5.12) vs 2.16 (1.74 – 2.70)], alcoholism [pOR (95% CI)= 2.35 (0.73 – 7.59) vs 1.71(1.08 – 2.72)],
and sharing syringes [pOR (95% CI)= 6.10 (2.57 – 14.5) vs 2.70 (2.01 – 6.35)] showed notable decline. Harm
reduction programs and condom use have been recognized as chief HIV prevention strategies, while male
circumcision contributed a partial role. Collectively, sexual risk factors continue to be a key driver of the global
HIV epidemic. Persistent and emerging risk factors identified in our analysis should constitute the primary
targets of HIV prevention programmes to accelerate efforts towards HIV elimination.
1. Sexual contact, IDUs and vertical transmission are established major risk factors
1. The pace of HIV transmission is refolding, but major risks are continuing
2. Sociocultural factors are driving the HIV epidemic and sexual promiscuity has become the
3. Condom use and harm reduction are key pillars of HIV prevention
This study combined data across epidemiological studies to drive consensus and accurate assessment of
HIV transmission risk. Attention must be paid for behavioral and sociocultural determinants of disease
transmission. New intervention programs must be implemented to halt the transmission of HIV based on
the evidence‐based emerging risk factors that started to take considerable roles over the recent years.
Results
1- Risk factors of HIV infection
Tables 1–4 summarize the key factors influencing HIV transmission based on the eligible
epidemiological studies.
Obviously, harm reduction programs and condom use were chief protective factors against HIV across
early and late time periods. Nevertheless, MC has emerged in the late time periods as a contributing factor in
HIV prevention [pOR= 0.43, 95% CI: 0.30–0.61] (Table 5).
Discussion
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Data availability
All data are fully available without restriction by the corresponding author at [email protected]
and through the public data repository “Harvard Dataverse” at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/
Ethical considerations
Funding
No financial support or fund was received.
Ethical approval
The study was approved by the institutional review board and the Ethics Committee of the High Institute of
Public Health-Alexandria University [no. 358-2019]. The IRB waived the need for the informed consent. The
research was conducted in accordance with the ethical guidelines of Helsinki’s Declaration (2013). Data sheets
were coded with numbers to maintain the anonymity and confidentiality of patient’s data.
This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
Author contributions
AFK: Conducted the database search, data extraction, data curation, statistical analysis and interpretation of
data, contributed to writing of the manuscript, revised and approved final version of the manuscript
EWAW: Conceptualization, developed the theoretical framework and study design, conducted the data base
search, data extraction, took the lead for overall direction and planning, supervised the study implementation,
data curation, analysis and interpretation of data, major contribution to writing, revised and approved final
version of the manuscript
References
Abajobir, A., & Zeleke, A. (2013). Knowledge, attitude, practice and factors associated with prevention of
mother-to-child transmission of HIV/AIDS among pregnant mothers attending antenatal clinic in
Hawassa referral hospital, South Ethiopia. Journal of AIDS and Clinical Research, 4(215), 2.
Abtew, S., Awoke, W., & Asrat, A. (2016). Knowledge of pregnant women on mother-to-child transmission of
HIV, its prevention, and associated factors in Assosa town, Northwest Ethiopia. HIV AIDS (Auckl), 8,
101-107. doi:10.2147/hiv.s100301
Ajema, C., Mbugua, C., Memiah, P., Wood, C., Cook, C., Kotut, R., & Digolo, L. (2018). Addressing the dual
health epidemics of HIV and sexual abuse among children and adolescents in Kenya: uptake of HIV
counseling and post-exposure prophylaxis. Adolesc Health Med Ther, 9, 1-9.
doi:10.2147/AHMT.S149416
Alcaide, M. L., Rodriguez, V. J., Fischl, M. A., Jones, D. L., & Weiss, S. M. (2017). Addressing intravaginal
practices in women with HIV and at-risk for HIV infection, a mixed methods pilot study. International
Journal of Womens Health, 9, 123-132. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S125883
Alsan, M. M., & Cutler, D. M. (2013). Girls' education and HIV risk: evidence from Uganda. Journal of Health
Economics, 32(5), 863-872. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.06.002
Alter, M. J. (2006). Epidemiology of viral hepatitis and HIV co-infection. Journal of Hepatology, 44(1 Suppl),
S6-9. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2005.11.004
Ande, A., McArthur, C., Kumar, A., & Kumar, S. (2013). Tobacco smoking effect on HIV-1 pathogenesis: role
of cytochrome P450 isozymes. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, 9(11), 1453-1464.
doi:10.1517/17425255.2013.816285
Figure Legend
Figure 1: Prisma flow diagram illustrating the search strategy and the process of study selection and sorting for
inclusion in the meta-analysis articles.
Footnote of Figure 1
* Articles were omitted due to the inaccessibility of their full text.
Total studies
Risk factor Pooled 95% C.I. No. Studies~
OR LL UL (I2)
Male sex 3.63 1.88 6.99 9/6 (87.5)
Female sex 3.73 1.23 11.3 7/5 (97.6)
Primary education 1.55 1.19 2.02 5/3 (0.0)
Secondary education 1.68 1.27 2.22 6/5 (25.0)
Blood transfusion 1.00 1.00 1.00 2/1 (0.0)
T4-lymphocyte count <1,000/cmm 8.50 2.94 24.6 2/1 (0.0)
STIs 2.68 2.21 3.27 28/27 (65.6)
Genital ulcers 3.13 2.38 4.13 17/10 (0.0)
HBV positive 3.14 2.07 4.77 3/3 (47.9)
~ number of included studies (in bold) versus the total number of eligible studies
I2= The percentage of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity
Total studies
Risk factor Pooled 95% C.I. No. Studies~
OR LL UL (I2)
Cigarette smokers 1.94 1.36 2.75 5/4 (36.8)
Alcoholism 1.77 1.20 2.62 10/9 (75.6)
Injectable drug users 2.60 2.05 3.31 45/33 (88.2)
Syringe sharing 2.95 2.22 3.91 11/7 (0.0)
Partner is injecting drug user 2.48 1.24 4.98 3/2 (84.4)
Harm reduction^ 0.60 0.43 0.82 11/10 (84.5)
~ number of included studies (in bold) versus the total number of eligible studies
I2= The percentage of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity
^ includes drug treatment programs and Safe injection programs
Total studies
Risk factor Pooled 95% C.I. No. Studies~
OR LL UL (I2)
Young sexual intercourse (adolescent females) 1.74 1.36 2.22 3/3 (0.0)
Imprisonment 1.61 1.31 1.97 6/4 (3.2)
Migration 2.02 1.52 2.68 2/1 (0.0)
Mental illness and depression 1.97 1.43 2.70 7/5 (47.1)
Rape 1.94 1.33 2.84 2/2 (0.0)
Child sexual abuse 1.71 1.47 1.98 8/8 (31.5)
Prostitution 2.50 1.74 3.60 15/12 (65.7)
Sex with a sex worker 1.69 0.84 3.39 5/3 (76.8)
Heterosexual intercourse 1.18 0.85 1.63 7/3 (0.0)
Bisexual partner 2.57 1.31 5.05 3/2 (51.8)
Multiple sex partners 2.34 1.91 2.88 19/12 (67.2)
Homosexual men 3.10 1.84 5.22 13/11 (91.7)
Oral sex 1.28 0.72 2.29 4/4 (78.5)
Receptive anal sex 2.58 1.75 3.81 17/15 (89.6)
Insertive anal sex 1.40 0.99 1.98 4/3 (29.2)
Having condomless sex 3.59 1.98 6.53 13/8 (90.7)
Vaginal douching 1.08 0.60 1.96 3/3 (83.3)
Male circumcision 0.43 0.30 0.61 11/7 (33.4)
Lack of male circumcision 3.70 1.51 9.06 5/1 (0.0)
~ number of included studies (in bold) versus the total number of eligible studies
I2= The percentage of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity
Total studies
Risk factor Pooled 95% C.I. No. Studies~
OR LL UL (I2)
Vertical transmission (VT) 3.83 1.74 8.44 3/2 (70.6)
(VT): Breast feeding 1.77 0.85 3.71 5/3 (72.6)
(VT): smoking 1.45 1.07 1.96 2/1 (0.0)
(VT): maternal viral RNA levels >43,000 copies/mL 3.23 2.39 4.35 2/2 (0.0)
(VT): elective caesarean section 0.45 0.17 1.20 2/1 (0.0)
(VT): maternal low CD4+ lymphocyte count 3.19 2.30 4.41 6/4 (5.3)
(VT): placental membrane inflammation 6.15 2.05 18.4 2/2 (13.6)
(VT): maternal p24 antigenemia 9.61 0.52 176.6 3/2 (74.3)
(VT): very low birth weight <1500 g 2.80 1.39 5.65 3/1 (0.0)
(VT): chemokine receptor CCR5(Δ32ccr5) heterozygotes gene 1.06 0.85 1.32 2/2 (4.1)
~ number of included studies (in bold) versus the total number of eligible studies
I2= The percentage of variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity
tbed_13621_f1.tif