Lesson 5, Book of Psalm
Lesson 5, Book of Psalm
Lesson 5, Book of Psalm
Lesson Outline
Topic 1: Introduction and Figures of Comparison
Simile and Metaphor
Hypocatastasis
Personification
Anthropomorphism and Zoomorphism
Topic 2: Figures of Substitution
Metonymy
Synecdoche
Topic 3: Other Significant Figures
Merism
Hyperbole
Idiom
Irony
Symbol
Topic 4: Figures in Psalm 91
The figure of a metaphor is very similar to a simile. Once again we have an explicit comparison of
two unlike things that have something in common, yet a metaphor does not use the words “like” or
“as.” Rather, the two things compared are joined by an equative verb (for example, “is” or “was”).
We can see a clear example of this in Psalm 23:1: “The LORD is my shepherd.” Rather than saying
He is like a shepherd, the text makes the comparison by simply equating him with a shepherd. Of
course, the end result is the same. Once again, we need to analyze the figure:
Subject: The LORD
Thing compared: A shepherd
Common element: Attributes of caring, protecting, and providing for
Point of the figure: The psalmist is comforted by his relationship to the LORD, who
cares, protects, and provides for him.
QUESTION 2
Carefully read the following words from Psalm 84:11: “For the LORD God is a sun and shield; the
LORD gives grace and glory; no good thing does He withhold from those who walk uprightly”
(NASB). The initial clause of this verse has a double metaphor. The LORD is both a sun and a shield.
(Select all that apply.)
A. In comparing the LORD to a shield, the point is that He is a protector.
B. In comparing the LORD to a shield, the point is that God’s children should be prepared to
fight.
C. In comparing the LORD to a sun, the point is that He energizes us for spiritual service.
D. In comparing the LORD to a sun, the point is that He is the source of blessing.
Hypocatastasis
Another type of figure implying a comparison is called “hypocatastasis.” Here, only one of the
elements of the comparison is mentioned. This element is simply declared to be something else, thus
implying the comparison. Notice the following example from Psalm 22:16 (emphasis added):
Yes, wild dogs surround me—a gang of evil men crowd around me.
QUESTION 4
What is the point of the figure in Matthew 16:6?
A. Jesus is comparing the Pharisees to yeast, because they were multiplying so rapidly.
B. Since yeast is found in every home, Jesus was making the point that the religious leaders
were commonly found everywhere.
C. Jesus was comparing the sacrifices offered by the religious leaders to yeast, as a way of
warning people not to participate in them.
D. Jesus was comparing the teaching of the religious leaders to yeast, in order to make the point
that their teaching quickly spread and influenced others. But its powerful influence must be
resisted.
Personification
Sometimes an inanimate object may be given human characteristics (or actions) or be described in
human-like ways. This can apply not only to inanimate objects, but also to abstract ideas, concepts,
and animals. Psalm 35:10 is a good example of a personification:
All my bones shall say, “O LORD, who is like You?” (literal translation)
Obviously the bones of our body do not speak; they do not make words. Rather, bones provide a
frame for our flesh, organs, and other body parts. Yet here they are portrayed as speaking, as being
personified. In this particular example we have a double figure. Some would view the phrase “all my
bones” as constituting a figure of substitution (a synecdoche), representing the whole person. Others
might see an implied comparison. Because bones are hard and strong (at least in our youth), they
easily represent strength. Hence the psalmist was saying, “with all my strength (or with all my being),
I declare that there is no one like the LORD.” (Although he states it as a question, this is really a
Metonymy
A metonymy involves the substitution of one word for another closely associated with it. Usually this
will involve a noun, but sometimes it can also be a verbal action. The word that is the figure will be
an attribute of another word, or it will suggest another word (e.g., crown for royalty). Notice the
following example from Leviticus 26:6:
…and no sword will pass through your land. (literal translation)
In this case the word “sword” is an intended substitute for another word. The author is really trying to
say that war will not come upon the land as a result of an invading army. More exactly this is a
metonymy of cause for effect. That is, the word “sword” is the cause, and “war” is the effect. The
figure of metonymy is a broad category of which there are four basic subgroups.
Metonymy of cause for effect. In this type of metonymy, the cause is stated but the effect is intended
(as in the example above). Here is another example from Psalm 5:9:
There is nothing reliable in what they say; . . . their throat is an open grave; they flatter with their
tongue. (NASB)
The author uses the word “throat,” but he intends something else, namely, their speech. David is
talking about the wicked and the evil things they speak about. Their speech is destructive, just as
A more extensive presentation on “Figures of Speech” is placed in the Appendix at the end of the
course. You can use this in the future when you need help analyzing figures of speech.
Synecdoche
A synecdoche is similar to a metonymy in that it involves a substitution of one word (or concept or
phrase) for another. With synecdoche, however, the words involved have a closer association. We can
say that they are related generically; they are of the same genus. This happens, for example, when a
part of something is specified but the greater whole is intended. Psalm 24:3-4 is an example.
3 Who may ascend into the hill of the LORD? And who may stand in His holy place?
4 He who has clean hands and a pure heart. (NASB)
The psalmist has raised the question about who is qualified to appear at the Lord’s holy place (i.e., in
Jerusalem). The requirement (he answers) is to have clean hands and a pure heart. In this verse, two
parts of the body are mentioned, hands and heart. Yet the psalmist is not limiting the cleanness to
these only. He really means the purity of the whole person. So in this example we have the part of
Merism
A merism involves two words or concepts that are used together to express the totality of something.
These two words will typically be contrasting parts or two extremities. A classic example is seen in
Psalm 139:2:
You know when I sit down and when I get up;
even from far away you understand my motives.
Here the psalmist referred to the time when he sat down and then to the time when he got up. These
words represent the extremities of time for the day. But the psalmist is not saying that God knows
him only at those particular moments of the day. Rather he is saying that God knows him at these
times and at all times in between these two. In other words God knows his every action at every
moment of the day.
Hyperbole
Hyperbole is a deliberately exaggerated statement for the purpose of emphasis or heightened effect.
With hyperbole, more is said than is literally meant. Notice this example from Psalm 40:12:
My sins overtake me so I am unable to see;
they outnumber the hairs of my head so my strength fails me. (emphasis added)
The psalmist seems to feel overwhelmed by his own sins. Although they may be very numerous, he is
exaggerating their extent when he says that they outnumber the hairs of his head. But even though he
exaggerates their number, he still has a literal point to make, namely, that he senses how numerous
his sins are. Because of his multiplied sins, even his strength is weakened.
Irony
A writer uses irony when he says one thing but really intends something different, often intending the
very opposite of what he literally says. Notice this example from Amos 4:4:
Go to Bethel and rebel! At Gilgal rebel some more! Bring your sacrifices in the
morning, your tithes on the third day!
Bethel and Gilgal were illegitimate worship centers. Bethel, for example, was established by King
Jeroboam as a place for the people in the northern kingdom of Israel to worship so they would not go
to Jerusalem. The prophet was chiding the people when he urged them to go to these places to present
their sacrifices. In effect, he was saying, “Go ahead and go to places like Bethel, but know that as you
sacrifice there, you are really doing so in rebellion against God.”
Symbol
We have a symbol in the text when a material object is substituted for another reality (often implying
some characteristic or moral truth about the latter). Zechariah 4:7 is an example:
Who are you, you great mountain? Because of Zerubbabel you will become a level
plain.
In this verse, the great mountain is a symbol for the obstacles that stood in the way of rebuilding the
fallen temple. The governor Zerubbabel would succeed in rebuilding the temple.
We must be very careful not to label something a symbol which was not meant to be so. Oftentimes
the Bible will specifically identify the presence of a symbol (see Zech 3:8). At other times, careful
observance of the context will be essential to determine this. There is a great danger in treating
something as a symbol that was not intended as such, and we must always be careful not to interpret
the Bible symbolically. That is, we must be sure that God intended for something to be understood as
a symbol before we assume it to be one.
A horn is often a symbol in Scripture for power, especially military power. At times the horn can
refer to the king himself, since he was responsible for military success and the defense of the nation.
Notice Psalm 89:17-18:
17 You are the glory of their strength, and by Your favor our horn is exalted.
18 For our shield belongs to the LORD, and our king to the Holy One of Israel. (NASB,
emphasis added)
QUESTION 13
What are the points of these figures in which the psalmist calls the LORD “my refuge” and “my
fortress”? (Select all that apply.)
A. Protection and safety
B. Strong defense
C. Cold and impersonal
D. High and unattainable
QUESTION 14
Open your Life Notebook. As you reflect back on verses 1-2, what comes to your mind when you
think of the LORD being your refuge and fortress? Are there times in your life when you find
yourself fleeing to Him and finding shelter from trials or the attacks on your life? Having described
the LORD and His comforting protection, the psalmist responds by saying “My God, in whom I
trust.” It is not enough to know that the LORD is a protecting refuge. This benefit is for those who
trust in Him. Write down how you think you can apply this principle in verses 1-2 to your life.
Assignment
Read Psalm 91:3-13.
QUESTION 18
Verses 5-10 seem to make several allusions to experiences on the battlefield. Do the promises pertain
only to being in physical battle, or do we have a number of figures that ultimately speak of more
general threats? For example, is the promise of protection from the arrow in verse 5 limited only to
arrows, or is the word “arrow” a figure for weapons in general? In the following chart, match the
following words and phrases in bold with the appropriate figure.
Verse (author’s own literal translations) Figure
Verse 5 – “You will not be afraid … of the arrow that Synecdoche of species (specific for
flies by day.” general)
Verse 6 – “Of the pestilence that stalks in the darkness.” Metonymy of subject for attribute (the
container is put for the contents)
Verse 7 – “A thousand may fall at your side and ten Personification
thousand at your fight hand, but it shall not approach
you.”
Verse 10 – “No evil will befall you, nor will a plague Hyperbole
come near your tent.”
QUESTION 20
Regarding question 19, if these creatures are a figure of speech, what do they represent and what is
the psalmist trying to convey? Choose the best answer from the following:
A. The psalmist is promising that believers can literally walk on lions and snakes.
B. The dangerous creatures are figurative of hostile powers (the wicked), and the psalmist is
promising victory over such threats.
C. Since this is a merism for all creatures (the bravest to the lowest), the psalmist is promising
that mankind will have dominion over the entire animal realm.
D. These animals can produce death, and therefore the psalmist is promising believers that they
will have victory over death through resurrection.
Assignment
Reading Psalm 91:14-16.
The first thing that the LORD reveals is the cause for delivering the one who trusts in Him. Many
translations begin verse 14 by stating “Because he has loved Me” (NASB, emphasis added). Yet this
is not the normal word meaning to love. Rather this word (Hebrew ḥāshaq) has the basic meaning of
being attached to something. When emotions are involved, this can take on the meaning to desire or
take pleasure in. (See the use of ḥāshaq in Deut 21:11, and compare 1 Kgs 9:19.) In fact the
corresponding noun form (ḥēsheq) means a desire; a thing desired. Therefore the point of verse 14a is
probably something like this: “Because he has desired Me, I will deliver him.”
Psalm 8 is a psalm of praise for God’s graciousness to man in granting him an esteemed role in God’s
creation. Observe the following words:
When I consider Your heavens, the work of your fingers, The moon and the stars,
which You have ordained; What is man that You take thought of him, And the son of
man that You care for him? (NASB, emphasis added)
QUESTION 9
In the verses above, the phrase “son of man” is
A. A symbol for the king of the nation.
B. An idiom for mankind in general.
C. A personification of the heavenly planets.
D. A metonymy for the person who will inherit his father’s fortune.
QUESTION 10
In Psalm 44:6 we read, “For I will not trust in my bow; nor will my sword deliver me” (emphasis
added). In this verse, what kind of figure is the word “bow”?
A. A symbol of military weapons.
B. This is an example of irony.
C. This is a simile.
D. This is a synecdoche (specific weapons are substituted for weapons in general).