WELLE GA Perposal Edited
WELLE GA Perposal Edited
WELLE GA Perposal Edited
COLLAGE OF AGRICULTURE
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS.
PREPARED BY
NAME ID NO
MAY 2024
WOLAITA SODO,ETHIOPIA
i
ACKNOWLEGEMENT
First of all, we would like to thanks and greater gratitude goes to the almighty’’ God ‘for giving
us health, unity, peace and spiritual strength to accomplish our research proposal. Next we
would like to express our great respects as thanks to our adviser Alemayehu A(PHd). For
His un reserved comment evaluation to conduct the research proposal from beginning to the
end. Thirdly also we would like to thanks & respect our families for supporting us by
financial &giving as moral strength until this time & to the future. The end we would like to
thanks & respect to Wolaita Sodo University Gendaba campus & collage of agriculture,
department of agricultural economics.
i
.
ACKNOWLEGEMENT................................................................................................................i
ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. v
1. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................1
1.3 Objectives.........................................................................................................................4
2. LITERATURE REVIEW.......................................................................................................6
3. RESEARCH METHDOLGY...............................................................................................11
ii
3.3 Type and Source of Data....................................................................................................12
4.1 Budgeting.............................................................................................................................15
5. REFERENCES........................................................................................................................17
LIST OF TABLE
Table page
iii
ACRONYM
iv
ABSTRACT
This research aims to investigate the factors influencing the saving behavior of rural households. The
study will explore the determinants of saving habits among rural communities, considering demographic
and socio-economic characteristics. By employing a mixed-methods approach, including quantitative
surveys and qualitative interviews, the research seeks to provide comprehensive insights into the saving
practices of rural households. The findings are expected to inform targeted interventions and strategies to
promote savings and financial security in rural areas, benefiting policymakers, financial institutions, and
development organizations. The research proposal will focus on understanding the specific factors that
drive saving behavior in rural households, such as income levels, access to financial services, education,
and cultural attitudes towards savings. By examining these determinants, the study aims to shed light on
the challenges and opportunities for improving financial inclusion and promoting sustainable saving
habits in rural communities.
v
1. INTRODUCTION
According to classical economists like Adam Smith, David Ricardo and J.S.Mill, “saving is an
important determinant of economic growth”. Saving components can be based on an individual
or on household basis which proves to be the wellbeing. As for an individual saving becomes the
cushion for the future’s intercourse of the unforeseen and upcoming as well as the uncertain
circumstances of life. Saving is the part of the income earned by the individuals. For the higher
economic growth for the country, marginal propensity to save should be higher but it helps to the
multiplier process. .
Saving is among important variables for economic growth of any country. Saving is about
income that is not consumed by immediately buying goods and services. Saving constitutes the
basis for capital formation, investment and growth of a country. Serious problem confronting
poor countries including Ethiopia is the savings and investment gap. Because of this gap, these
countries find it difficult to finance investments needed for growth from domestic saving (Kifle,
2012).
According to kifle (2012), it is also common to see these countries to finance their investment in
the short run partly through domestic government borrowings and/or foreign loan and grants but
this would significantly increase the country’s debt burden and would not be a solution in the
long run. However, both economic variables are not emphasized as a major variable for
interventions for overall development in Africa in general and Ethiopia in Particular.
This is the case mainly because of: First, most of the studies carried out in the field have focused
on developed economies and unable to show the ground reality in poor developing countries.
Second, most of the studies adopted a macroeconomic approach yet the behavior of economic
units on the aggregate level may not necessarily be the same as on an individual or household
level. And third, even the existing limited empirical research results in Africa related to rural
household savings and investment are varied and inconclusive.
The saving level in Ethiopia particularly in rural areas is very low and little is known empirically
about its patterns and determinants. Savings in rural Ethiopia is mainly made out of the income
from agricultural activities ( Kifle, 2012).
Girma sighted as Degene (2012), seasonal and irregular as the cash flow through sale of
agricultural produce and availability of work is seasonal. This reduces their financial capacity to
save or poorly respond to incentives that promote savings in the country.
However, rural households do indeed save in the form of tangible assets and/or in financial forms
which can be potentially utilized by savings institutions and for investments which is very
essential for both households and nation.
Domestic savings consists of three compromise savings are important determinants of household
welfare(Freidman,1957).On one hand, without savings, households have few other mechanisms
to smooth out In recent years, economists, international organizations, and governments in
developing countries have placed increasing emphasis on the mobilization of deposits, not only
to increase domestic savings, to achieve sustained economic growth and development but also to
strengthen domestic financial intermediaries . The recent financial crisis has led to serious
repercussions in the global economy due to deep economic and moral losses of investors. These
events revealed the relevance of saving and especially its allocation in the nation economy
Indeed, saving is very important in the development of industrial and financial systems as well
as the only means to accumulate assets in the absence of credit and insurance markets to
households(Girma,2013).Although there is controversy regarding the relation between savings
and economic growth, it is generally agreed that once savings start to rise-perhaps due to
increases in income-they enhance the potential to finance investment, and lead to the creation of
more opportunities in the economy.
Household saving could be accumulating in real assets or financial assets. Large part of saving
accumulation in developing countries is in the form of real assets. These include livestock,
precious metals, or food stocks. However, these real assets less useful for industrial activities
2
since it does not liquid. The weakness saving in real assets is important reason for household in
developing countries to save in financial assets. They could save in banks or non-bank financial
institutions in cash form. In this respect, access to financial institution that meets liquidity needs
is crucial. This is the reason to introduce rural financial institution such as saving and credit
cooperatives that strategic in order to increase financial savings and loan facilities (kifle, 2012).
Thus, there is an immediate need to carefully understand the determinants of both the household
saving habit and the saving pattern in the rural households of district. To advocate appeals for
saving, there is a need to know about the saving motives of the individuals. An understanding of
3
the saving preferences also helps in calculating the saving instruments which can efficiently
arouse saving. Research questions
2. What are the factors affecting the household habits of saving in the areas of study?
3. What looks like the saving performance of households in the study area?
4. What are the constraints which faces households saving habits?
1.3 Objectives
To identify the factors affecting the growth of household habit of saving in the study area.
To assess the performance households toward their saving culture in the study area.
To identify the major constraints that influences household saving patterns.
In this area; As far as the time limit is concerned this study will focuses on the current situation
of household’s habit of saving.
4
1.6 Significance of the study
There are not many studies conducted or available relating to the determinants of saving pattern
of the rural people of Ethiopia at the micro level. Most of the studies on saving pattern of rural
people are based on secondary data which sometimes does not prove to be adequate for the
study. Most of the data available does not serve the needs of Ethiopia in a ground level
prospective. While studies conducted on the saving and income expenditure among rural and
urban households for various expenditure classes, little effort has been made to study the saving
pattern related to the individual’s behavior towards saving within rural sector. The study will be
taken to be on pattern of saving habits in the households that provides an important indicator for
economic development of the country. This study will also help to define the factors influencing
the saving pattern and to analyze certain constraints in the saving attitude in the rural areas.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
There are some theoretical models in the literature which explains different determinants of
savings and asset accumulations (Schultz, 2005; Nga, 2007; Rijckeghem and Ucer, 2009).
Keynesian model explains that the motive behind savings is the desire to bequeath an estate.
Disposable income is taken as the major determinant of individual savings in which People with
a low income considered as unable to save (Schultz, 2004; Nga, 2007; Rijckeghem and Ucer,
2009). In neoclassical economic theory, individuals are assumed to be rational beings who can
respond in predictable ways to changes in incentives. Individual utility is usually assumed to be a
function of consumption and savings are often treated by residual of resources that remain after
consumption (Beverly et al., 2003; Cashell, 2009; Rijckeghem and Ucer, 2009).
6
However, these theories were initially developed for developed economies and unable to explain
the economy and the feature of households in developing countries as they have different
characteristics (Schultz, 2005; Nga, 2007). According to Zhu (2004), some of the peculiar
features of household’s savings in developing countries in general and their rural areas in
particular are; large household size, agriculture as a major source of income and most households
live in abject poverty.
Many researchers indicate that many rural households in developing countries, particularly in
Africa, are too poor to save (Rutherford, 2000; Robinson, 2001; Devaney et al., 2007). However,
as Coleman and Williams (2006) stated, the poor do save even though they do not have complete
access to savings facilities in formal financial institutions. Instead, they use informal institutions
for their savings. These include livestock, crop products, housing materials, farm equipment, and
some other precious metals like jewelry.
Low saving has been a dominant feature of the Ethiopian Economy. At household level,
irrespective of small size, rural households in Ethiopia do save in many ways, as individuals or in
a group. They usually save in kind mainly in food-grains or in livestock (Dejene, 2006).
Indeed, saving is very important in the development of industrial and financial systems
(Attanasio, 1998; Baharumshah et al., 2003) as well as the only means to accumulate assets in
the absence of credit and insurance markets to households. Although there is controversy
regarding the relation between savings and economic growth, it is generally agreed that once
savings start to rise-perhaps due to increases in income-they enhance the potential to finance
investment , and lead to the creation of more opportunities in the economy (Attanasio,1998;
Bernhiem and Shoven, 1998).
7
Domestic savings consists of three components, viz., corporate, households, and government
savings. Household saving could be accumulating in real assets or financial assets. Large part of
saving accumulation in developing countries is in the form of real assets (Rehman et al.,2010).
These include livestock, precious metals, or food stocks. However, these real assets less useful
for industrial activities since it does not liquid. The weakness saving in real assets is important
reason for household in developing countries to save in financial assets (Deaton, 1989). They
could save in banks or non- bank financial institutions in cash form. In this respect, access to
financial institution that meets liquidity needs is crucial. This is the reason to introduce rural
financial institution such as saving and credit cooperatives that strategic in order to increase
financial savings and loan facilities. Household save for a variety of reasons such as liquidity
constraint or life cycle savings. In developing countries savings are important determinants of
household welfare. On one hand, without savings, households have few other mechanisms to
smooth out unexpected variations in their income, and so, shocks may create some problems of
human capital accumulation at early ages (Attanasio, 1998).
8
income of the individual increases, consumption increases and simultaneously saving also
increases (Bernhiem and Shoven, 1991). Economic studies have shown that income is the
primary determinant of consumption and saving. Rich people save more than poor people, both
absolutely and as a percent of income. The very poor are unable to save at all. Instead, as long as
they can borrow or draw down their wealth, they tend to save. That is they tend to spend more
than they earn reducing they are accumulated saving or going deeper into debt. So we can say
that there is a deep relationship between consumption, income and saving and they all affects to
each other which can be shown with the equation,(Sameroynina ,2005);. :
C=f(Y)
S=Saving
S=Y-C Y=Income
Many people fail to save what they need to for retirement (Munnell, Webb, and Golub-Sass
2009). In economics, the life-cycle hypothesis (LCH) is a concept addressing individual
consumption patterns. The life-cycle hypothesis implies that individuals both plan their
consumption and savings behavior over the long-term and intend to even out their consumption
in the best possible manner over their entire lifetimes. The key assumption is that all individuals
choose to maintain stable lifestyles. This implies that they usually don't save up a lot in one
period to spend furiously in the next period, but keep their consumption levels approximately the
same in every period.
9
2.2.3 Saving and Money Deposited in Banks
Sometimes people think they are doing finances well when those money-saving behaviors are
really compromising the security of their savings. A budget and regularly depositing money into
a saving account will build up a nice buffer in case fall on hard times, but also doing these things
can potentially put a big hole in that safety net. Poor is not that relational in depositing in banks
because of less income (Rehman H, Faridi Z, Bashir F, 2010)
3. RESEARCH METHDOLGY
The study will be conducted in werke meskele kebele, mekaneselam district in the South Wollo
zone which is 470 km away from Adis Ababa.The woreda surrounds Dessie town. Dessie is
capital city of South Wollo zone. The study area is located approximately between 38 degrees
and 40 degrees longitude, 470 km from adis ababa. The total area of the district is about 13,965
hectares of which11,442 hectares are cultivate Although the soil type varies from place to place,
black’ soils are the common ones. The mean annual rainfall of the study area receives maximum,
10
medium and minimum rainfall of 1,400, 1,150 and 900 mm, respectively. The mean daily
maximum and minimum temperature of the area is 21.40 0C and 10.40 0C, respectively. The
altitude of the study area is ranges from 1,350 to2,600 meters above sea level (DZWARD
Office, 2007; CSA, 2007).
The total population of the district is estimated to be 97,327 of which 48,835 and 48,492
are males and females, respectively. The district comprises about 27,130 household heads
of which 22,796 are male household heads and 4,334 are female household heads. The district
has 19 Peasant Associations (PAs) and each PA has agriculture development center. There are
106 agricultural development agents in the district and about 25,506 farmers have access to
extension services (DZWARD Office, 2010).
The major land use of the area was mixed farming systems. The area is relatively described by
low level of livestock rearing practices mainly due to shortage of grazing land. According to the
district agriculture and rural development office, in 20011/12 production year, there are a total of
86,306 livestock population in the district. The major animal species kept are about, 34.97%
heads of cattle, 33.67% heads of chickens and 22.99% heads of sheep and goats, and 8.37%
heads of equines. In addition to this, 5507 beehives are also found in the district.
Primary data through informal and formal survey will be collected. Informal survey will be under taken
first; to collect background information which will be used for subsequent survey. Then formal survey
will conducted to assess the determinants of household habits of saving in the study area by using
structured questionnaires interview schedule and checklist for focus group discussion. The
interview will be help to gather the necessary qualitative and quantitative information through
asking questions and writing down the response of the respondents which build research purpose.
It will be proposed to those people selected as a sample. On the other hand, focus group
discussion will used by our to obtain qualitative data. FGD allowed a dialogue among
participants and stimulates them to openly express their views on the issues raised.
Secondary data will be collected through reviewing of documents, reports and records of
published and unpublished documents. It is the main source of information and these data will
easily available inexpensive and obtained quickly. These secondary data indicate the past and
current performance of Determinants Of Household Habits Of Saving.
This study will be used probability sampling techniques to draw a representative sample. Two
stage sampling techniques will be used to select sample households. In the first stage, simple
random sampling of one kebele from the 37 kebeles found in the district. In the second stage
from these 1 kebeles 1223 male and 1227 female headed households are randomly selected.
Probability proportional to sample size was employed to select the total of sample farmers.
Hence, a total of 2450 households were selected.
The researcher will be select 100 respondents using simple random sampling or According to
Yamane (1967) sample size at 95% confidence interval, the degree of variability 0.05 and level
of precession 10% sample size was computed as follows
N
By formula n= Where, N=Total of population
1+ N (e 2)
N=2450
e=0.1
13
4. BUDGETING AND WORK PLAN
4.1 Budgeting
No Item Unit Amount Unit Total
price
1 Pen No 4 25 100
Ruler No 1 20 20
Binding No 1 25 25
Total 325
14
3 Internet 128
CD No 1 40 40
Total 386.75
5 Contingency 100
6 Total 961.75
1 Topic selection
2 Literature review
3 Proposal
4 Data collection
5 Data processing
and analysis
15
6 Reporting writing
7 Submission and
presentation
5. REFERENCES
Attanasio OP (1998). Cohort Analysis of Saving Behaviour by U.S. Households. Journal of
Human Resources. 33(3): 575-609.
Baharumshah A, Thanoon MA, Salim R (2003). Saving dynamics in the Asian countries. J.
Asian Econ.. 13(6): 827- 845.
Bernhiem BD, Shoven JB (1991). National Saving and Economic Performance. NBER-
University of Chicago Press. 131-158.
Brata AG (1999). Household Saving Behavior: The case of rural industry in Bantul. Analysis
CSIS. 28(1): 75-86. Browning M, Lusardi A (1996). Household Saving: Micro Theories
and Micro Facts J. Econ. Literature. 34: 1797-1855.
16
Cashell, B.W., (2009). The Fall and Rise of Household Saving. CRS Report for Congress.
Congressional Research Service 7-5700.
CSA (Central Statistical Agency), (2010). FDRE General Country Data. Cronje, Mark , (2009).
Creating a Savings Culture for the Black Middle Class in South Africa - Policy
Guidelines and Lessons from China and India. University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Deaton A. (1989). Saving in Developing Countries: Theory and review. Proceedings of the
World Bank annual conference on development economics. 1: 61-93.
Karlan D, Ahraf N, Yin W (2006 ). Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment
savings product in the Philippines. Universities of Princeton and Harvard, Mimeo.
Kotlikoff LJ, Spivak A (1981). “The Family as an Incomplete Annuities Market.” Political
Economy 89:372-391.
NAYAT,2005 The present study tries to analyze the determinants and pattern of saving behavior
in rural household in Ethiopia).
Newman C, Tarp F, Broeck K, Quang C, Khani L (2008). Household saving in Vietnam: insight
form a 2006 rural household survey
OrbetaJr AC (2006). Children and Household Savings in the Philippines. Philippines Institute for
development studies. Discussion Paper Series. 14: 11-22.
17
Rehman H, Faridi Z, Bashir F (2010). Households Saving Behavior in Pakistan: A Case of
Multan District. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS). 30(1): 17-29.
18