John Burnam: &o6e'pas. (Classical Philology
John Burnam: &o6e'pas. (Classical Philology
John Burnam: &o6e'pas. (Classical Philology
BY JOHN M. BURNAM
realities for the outward show and the frivolities of life; they also
reflect the scholar and translator, the critic who was more concerned
for the correctness of the biblical text than its external adornment.
These texts testify as well to the presence of a number of people
in the communion at an early age (Ep. XXII may be dated 384)
who were interested in caligraphy and book decoration for artistic
reasons. True, many of the Christians may have been members
of the congregation of Rev. Dr. Yellowplush, but even these repre-
sent the unworthy side of a praiseworthy impulse.
In general, this and the similar citations refer often with dis-
approval merely to the decorative effect of the purple and the precious
metals. And yet there are extracts from the writing of the Fathers
from which the disciples of Rev. Dr. Yellowplush could draw a
legitimate defense of their admiration for these unusually fine copies.
There was current a system of interpretation in the works of their
critics which they could employ when attacked, namely a resort to
allegory, mysticism, and symbolism. Let us devote a few lines to
the history of this movement.
The general problem of criticism and interpretation began at an
early moment to confront those Greeks who read and studied the
Homeric poems. The relevant questions became acute when reli-
gious opinions were involved, and as men found themselves drifting
away from a simple and unquestioning belief in the gods of Olympus
and the stories related about them in the two national epics, it was
natural to explain these stories in a way to suit the later ideas.
Many a statement in the text was evidently figurative; why not
others as well? If we find allegory of service in philosophy, why
not in poetry too? If Pythagoras arrives at a system of number-
symbolism, and if Zeus was originally the sky, by skilful interpreta-
tion one may find numerical harmonies and moral signification in
still other elements of ancient story.
The Stoics were the chief masters and champions of this mode
of exegesis. They found it a convenient way of presenting their
doctrines to the public and of defending the national religion. The
various occurrences in the national mythology out of harmony with
modern views became sometimes natural phenomena having no
moral content at all, at other times, by way of the allegory, became
148 JOHN M. BURNAM
Recalling now what has already been said about the concealment
of the Ineffable Name, let us consider what St. Augustine says
(Quaestiones in Exod. II: 120, Tom. III, 458EF): he begins by
quoting Exod. XXVIII:36: "Et facies laminam auream puram, et
formabis in eadem formationem signi, sanctitatem Domini: et
impones illud super hyacinthum duplicem tortam: et erit super
mitram; secundum adspectum mitrae erit: et erit super frontem Aaron.
Et auferet Aaron peccata sanctorum eorum." These words are
thus explained: "Quomodo formetur in lamina sanctitas Domini,
non video, nisi aliquibus litteris, quas quidam quattuor esse dicunt
Hebraeas, quod, ut Graeci appellant, rErpaypad'tkarov nomen Dei
ineffabile credunt fuisse vel esse adhuc usque. Sed quaelibet sint
vel quomodolibet se habeant illae litterae, ut dixi, sanctitatem
Domini vel sanctificationem, si hoc magis credundum est, quod
Graecus habet itytao-,a non nisi litteris in auro formari potuisse
crediderim."
Here, then, we find a mystic signification attributed to the gold
on which, only, the hidden name of God was to be incised. This
passage alone might have served as the starting-point for symbolism
of the metal in those old Bibles and Gospels. But the lovers of
handsome books with mystical tendencies were not limited to these
words only, for there were four verses in the canonical Scriptures
dealing with gold and silver which recur in the Fathers with alle-
gorical or mystic comment. For instance, St. Augustine after
saying (Enarratio in Psalmum LXXII: 17, Tom. 14, 751E): "intel-
legimus per aurum sapientiam, quae ita excellit inter omnes doctrinas,
ut aurum inter metalla," cites as his proof Prov. VIII:10: "Accipite
prudentiam sicut argentum, et sapientiam sicut aurum probatum."
(Vulgate text ed. Fillion runs: "Accipite disciplinam meam et non
pecuniam; doctrinam magis quam aurum eligite.")
The remaining verses in their Vulgate rendering are: Ps. XI:7:
"Eloquia Domini, eloquia casta; argentum igne examinatum, pro-
batum terrae, purgatum septuplum"; Ps. LXVII :14: "Si dormiatis
inter medios cleros, pennae columbae deargentatae, et posteriora
dorsi eius in pallore auri"; ibid., vs. 31: "ut excludant eos qui
probati sunt argento." Our patristic citations ring the changes on
these extracts in a series of mystic interpretations. They are:
THE EARLYGOLDAND SILVERMANUSCRIPTS 151
ORIGENES
AVGVSTINVS
EVCHERIVS
ANASTASIVS SINAITA
seems that from those oft-quoted biblical verses and the doctrinal
comment on them a mystical conclusion was drawn, in accordance
with which the name of divine wisdom was done in contract, and
thereby concealed form, and the divine word in silver.
It is well known that at a later period the tradition of gold writing
revived or perhaps survived: but the writer has no evidence to
show a continuance of the mystical tradition. S. Berger in his
Histoire de la Vulgate has a whole chapter devoted to an kcole chry-
sographique and shows that there still exist no less than nineteen
specimens of such workmanship, all produced within the confines
of the Carolingian empire, between the years 780 and 880. Gold
MSS continue sporadically for over two hundred years longer and
actually reappear during the humanistic epoch. All that time silver
was not absolutely forgotten. As for the gold or silver, we will
content ourselves with citing from M. Prou (Manuel de la pal&o-
graphie latine et franmaise, 3me 6d., 1910, p. 38): "Dans un certain
nombre de manuscrits carolingiens 6crits 'a 1'encre noire, les titres,
les initiales, les noms du Christ, de Dieu, du Saint-Esprit, sont seuls
trac6s en lettres d'or ou d'argent."
In conclusion, it may be observed that this use of handsome adorn-
ment, especially with the help of gold, is frequent in the finest early
Christian mosaics. For information and details the reader is referred
to the first volume of the Histoire de l'art now in process of publica-
tion under the editorship of Andr6 Michel.
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI