Book - 2015 - Vivian Robson - Astrology and Sex
Book - 2015 - Vivian Robson - Astrology and Sex
Book - 2015 - Vivian Robson - Astrology and Sex
icr It $*•
The striking features of the map are Saturn and Neptune squaring each
other in mutable signs from angles, and Uranus in an elevated position in
opposition to Mercury, the mental ruler in a mental house, and in square to
the Moon on the cusp of the twelfth. Venus is in aspect with Mars, but is strong
and favorable, which is a very familiar feature of many types. As a general rule
we may say that a tendency that is harmful to women, such as sadism, involves
a weak and badly afflicted Venus, whereas one in which women are favored or
not affected, such as masochism and homosexuality shows a strong and well-
aspected Venus. Thus the nature of the aspects to Venus will often serve to
discriminate between different types of sexual difference.
Ihe chief mental twist is indicated by the afflictions from Uranus to Mercury
and the Moon, both of which planets strongly affect the mind. Saturn, ruler of
the fifth house, in the Midheaven in a masculine and mental sign is another
pointer to the nature of the sex outlook, while Neptune conjunction the De
scendant adds to the mental and emotional chaos, and also indicates dissatis
faction with marriage.
It might be thought that the rising of Virgo, the sign of chastity, and the
position of the Sun and Venus in Libra together with other idealistic positions
in the map would operate against a difference of this nature. 'Ihis, however, is
another feature common to many tendencies of different kinds. Certain forms
of sexual difference are often encouraged by a morbid fear of infection and
disease, or shyness with the opposite sex, or an aversion to normal sexual
intercourse owing to excessive idealism or fastidiousness. Therefore, positions
giving these qualities may themselves aggravate any tendencies that may exist
in the map.
Another homosexual subject was the Russian composer Tchaikovsky. The
horoscope shown is unfortunately a speculative one, but this does not, of
course, affect the longitudes and aspects.
The map is a somewhat less Uranian one than Oscar Wildes. This, however,
may easily be due to variations in the sexual tendencies, which may be of a
more positive or negative type in different individuals. The chief afflictor in
this case is Neptune, which is in square to the Sun and Mars, and to Jupiter,
which opposes these two bodies. As in Wilde’s case the affliction centers around
the middle of the fixed signs, and as one would expect, involves Scorpio.
Mercury and Venus are in the positive masculine sign Aries, both in conjunc
tion with Pluto, which no doubt frequently plays a part in a difference in
sexuality. The twelfth house is again involved in this case as in the last, and we
have a mutable square between Saturn and Uranus instead of Saturn and
Neptune. There is, indeed, a great deal of similarity in the two examples, making
allowance for the probability that Wilde was much more positively inclined
than Tchaikovsky.
Homosexuality is not, I imagine, so common among women as among
men. Certainly one rarely hears of it, but that may merely be due to the greater
secretiveness of women in regard to sexual matters. The Uranian intensification
of the self, or at least, oi the personal sex, would of course be a prominent
feature, and one would expect marked signs of fastidiousness. The intensifica
tion of the masculine factors in the horoscope, which occurs in male homo
sexuality might or might not be present according to the positive or negative
nature of the particular case in point, but would usually appear, while Neptune
would almost certainly share the prominence of Uranus, owing to its great
influence over feminine differences in sexuality.
It is probable that in most cases of female homosexuality one of the natives
adopts a masculine role, and in that case one would expect the masculine
elements of the horoscope to predominate.
An interesting case of female homosexuality was found in Astrology (vol.
VII, June 1933).
24 ss or
In all cases of extreme sadism we should expect find Venus weak and
afflicted. Here Venus is conjoined with Saturn in its detriment, and is in square
with Mars, in semisquare with the Sun and Moon, and in wide opposition with
Uranus. Both Uranus and Mars in the violent signs Capricorn and Aries afflict
Saturn, while Mercury suffers from the unknown effect of an opposition from
Pluto in Scorpio.
A factor common in perversion cases is an affliction, in this case a square,
between the luminaries, and here each of them is further afflicted by both
Saturn and Mars. It should be noted that Neptune does not appear to be at all
prominent, and one would not expect it to be so, except perhaps in relation to
the twisted mentality. I should, however, expect to find Pluto of considerable
importance in cases of sadism.
Sadism among women is much less frequent, except in a mild way. It is
essentially a perversion arising from abnormal intensification of the male
attributes, and is therefore much more natural to a man than to a woman. I
have suggested that in the case of homosexuality the indications in male and
female horoscopes would frequently be of an opposite nature, each intensifying
his or her own sex. In sadism, on the other hand, the signs would not be likely
to differ much in the case of men and women, for both should show intensifi
cation of the positive and violent factors. Sadism should be readily distinguish
able in many female horoscopes by the stressing of the feminine qualities in
the former, and of the masculine and violent ones in the latter. With men,
however, it would not be so easy, for the masculine elements of the map are
stressed. In sadism Venus is not only weak but receives violent aspects as well.
Every perversion, however, is subject to many variations, and more than one
may be present in the same individual, so that it is quite impossible to lay down
any very definite rules. In the relations between opposite sexes sadism is quite
recognizable but where individuals of the same sex are concerned it is difficult
to discriminate between ordinary cruelty, in which the sexual element is absent,
and sadism, which sexuality is the dominant motive. Women who take a delight
in whipping children may be influenced by either motive, but more often the
impulse is a sadistic one. Catherine the Great of Russia who amused herself by
chastising her ladies-in-waiting across her knee was also actuated by sadistic
impulses rather than by cruelty.
Classic instances of female sadism are afforded by Messalina and Catherine
de Medici, the latter of whom experienced the greatest pleasure in having ladies
of her court whipped before her eyes. Her horoscope shows Saturn and Mars
in opposition from Capricorn and Cancer, respectively, along the meridian,
Sun and Venus rising in conjunction with Uranus, and Pluto in Capricorn
squaring the Moon and Mercury. The map unmistakably indicates great per
version and cruelty, and the slightly earlier map given by Cadbury does not
alter this. It should be noted that the correct longitude of the Moon is 11 Libra,
and not 17 Libra as given in the Gadbury map.
Lord Byron, the poet, who was in the habit of beating his mistresses, may
have been sadistic to some extent, and perhaps even more than is suspected,
for his horoscope (N.N. 752) shows Venus in Aquarius in conjunction with
Saturn and in sesquisquare with Mars, while the Moon is conjoined with
Uranus and squared by Neptune.
Another poet, Charles Baudelaire, appears to have exhibited certain
symptoms of sadism, but this was by no means the only peculiarity from which
he suffered. He threw pots against shop windows for the pleasure of hearing
them break; changed his lodgings every month; dyed his hair green; wore
winter clothes in summer and vice-versa; and exhibited many symptoms of the
mental disease which eventually led to his death from general paralysis of the
insane. His sexual outlook was a morbid one, for he showed a marked preference
for ugly and horrible women, dwarfs, and giantesses, while according to Lom-
broso he said that women were animals who should be shut up, beaten, and
well fed, and once expressed a desire to a very beautiful woman that he might
see her suspended by the hands to the ceiling that he might kiss her feet, which
appears to have been an example of foot fetishism.
His horoscope is one from which almost any form of insanity might be
expected. Here again we find Venus in conjunction with Saturn in an unfavor
able sign, which is so common a feature of sadism and similar perversions.
Venus is also seriously afflicted by Uranus and Neptune, themselves in square
to Mars, while the Moon is squared by the Sun and Saturn. The stationary
position of Mercury in the seventh house in conjunction with Pluto in Pisces
is also of considerable significance, especially in view of the foot fetishism
already mentioned.
Chapter XI: Masochism and Other Abnormalities
Masochism is the exact opposition of sadism, for while the latter is
characterized by the desire to exercise domination and cruelty, the former
desires to suffer cruelty and domination at the hands of another, often a member
of the opposite sex. From a strictly scientific point of view the term perversion
is a loose one, for it often includes mental states that would be better described
as intensification.
The name masochism was applied to this perversion owing to the fact that
it forms the chief theme of the novels of Leopold von Sacher-Masoch, who was
himself strongly under its influence. It is perhaps the chief Neptunian perver
sion, but its passive and secretive character renders any estimate of its frequency
extremely hard to obtain. There is, however, a good deal of evidence to show
that it is far more common and widespread than might generally be supposed,
though it is exceedingly difficult to obtain illustrative horoscopes, for men are
shy of divulging their subjection to women, and publicity would naturally be
rarer than in the case of sadism.
The astrological signs of masochism include a dominant and afflicting
Neptune, and a strong and favorable feminine element in the map. The tendency
to renunciation and the suppression of the self inherent in Neptune form an
essential feature of masochism, while the dominant position accorded to
women presupposes a very strong and favorable Venus. Saturn aspecting the
Moon or Venus intensifies the desire for subjection, but afflictions from Mars
are also to be expected when, as is almost always the case, there is a strong
desire for whipping and other punishments.
In spite of a love of torture and flagellation, however, masochism never
reaches the violence and intensity of sadism, for the extreme sadist will mutilate
and murder his or her victim, whereas not even the most fervent masochist
would be likely to carry matters to the extent of acquiescing in his own murder.
Moreover, it has been noted by a French writer on the subject that the masochist
is more inclined than the sadist to be satisfied with a mental picture of condi-
tions as he or she desires them, and may actually from their practical realization.
This would lead us to expect a predominance of the airy and fiery signs over
the more practical ones in the horoscope.
Apart from Sacher-Masoch himself, there are two rather doubtful cases.
One of these is George Colman the Younger, born October 21,1762, who wrote
a poem called The Rodiad, which extols the benefits and pleasures of flagellation.
As the subject is treated from both the active and passive points of view it is
difficult to judge the relative proportions of sadism and masochism in his
mentality, but the fact that Venus and the Moon were both quite well aspected
in Sagittarius suggests that the latter was the prevailing perversion.
The other doubtful case is that of Henry Thomas Buckle, the author of the
well-known History of Civilization, who was born at Lee in Kent on November
24, 1821. Buckle published a series of small books containing anecdotes of
flagellation written from a distinctly masochistic standpoint. According to his
statement the items comprised in the books had been collected by him, but the
fact that the style of writing is uniform and distinctive, and also that flowers
are used throughout in a fetishistic manner, strongly suggests that all the items
were written by one person, either Buckle himself or another. His planetary
positions show Venus in Capricorn squared by a conjunction of Saturn and
Jupiter in Aries; Uranus and Neptune in close conjunction in Capricorn; the
Sun in the beginning of Sagittarius squared by Mars; and the Moon and
Mercury in the end of Scorpio also squared by Mars; all of which point to
perversion, but are not markedly masochistic. Probably Buckle, like Colman,
did not fall very definitely into one particular category.
Before dealing briefly with other sexual abnormalities 1 may mention a
point which is somewhat puzzling to account for, and that is the great promi
nence of Jupiter in most cases of perversion. Even the infamous Marquis de
Sade had Sun conjunction Jupiter, and strong Jupiterian aspects appear with
surprising frequency, sometimes as afflictions, but quite as often in a favorable
form. I am inclined to think that this is a sign of the hyperaesthesia, which is a
marked feature of sexual perversion, but whatever may be the exact explanation,
it is quite certain that a prominent Jupiter will not act as a safeguard against
psychopathic manifestations.
Fetishism
Fetishism is more often a feature of other perversions than a separate
perversion itself. The name is applied to those cases in which some inanimate
object, frequently an article of clothing or a particular part of the body, acts as
a source of sexual excitement. Shoes and feet appear to be the commonest
objects of fetishism, but flowers, hair, furs, and rings are also not at all uncom
mon, fur fetishism being .a particularly frequent feature of masochism. In
sadistic subjects the slashing of womens dresses, ink-throwing, and the cutting
off of womens hair are all examples of fetishism. In the horoscope such features
of any perversion must be of secondary importance, and not at all easy to
define. Fetishism connected with flagellation is usually indicated by Sagittarian
afflictions, while shoe or foot fetishism is a natural consequence of a predomi
nant Pisces. In all cases the sign gives the clue to the direction of fetishist
interest, and it appears usually to be either the sign containing Mercury, or one
from which Mercury is seriously afflicted. Baudelaire, with his foot fetishism,
and Rousseau with his desire for flagellation, are illustrations of this.
Satyriasis and Nymphomania
The pathological states known as satyriasis and nymphomania are not
perversions but abnormal intensification of the sexual desire in men and
women, respectively, and therefore depend upon the amount of sexuality and
sensuality shown in the horoscope. The planets Venus and Mars, and the signs
Taurus, Scorpio, and Capricorn are of chief importance, but one would expect
afflictions from Neptune to account for the promiscuity displayed.
Exhibitionism
I have no examples of this abnormality and cannot comment upon its
astrological causes. I should expect to find a prominent and probably angular
Moon seriously afflicted, an affliction between the Moon and Mercury; and
malefic aspects involving Cancer or the cardinal signs generally.
Necrophilia
This, I imagine, is a rare perversion, and it is certainly one that 1 have never
encountered. The symptoms suggest the influence of a strong but badly placed
and afflicted Saturn, together with a prominent Scorpio and eighth house
influence.
Masturbation
This is scarcely an abnormality and certainly not a perversion, though it
can accompany one. It is largely Neptunian, and due to hyperaesthesia indicated
by afflictions of Mars, Venus, and the sign Scorpio. At the same time it is
encouraged by twelfth house positions, and also by idealistic and fastidious
elements such as are afforded by Libra and Virgo.
Chapter XII: Marriage
While the nature of the sex outlook, both in its normal and abnormal
manifestations, is of very great importance from the scientific, psychological,
and medical standpoint, the light that astrology can throw upon marriage and
the help that it can give in forming a happy union or making the best of an
unhappy one are subjects that possess a much wider appeal for the average
person.
It is not generally considered necessary in astrological textbooks to define
the sense in which the word “marriage” is used, and on this account a certain
amount of misconception sometimes arises. 'Ihe dictionary defines marriage
as “the legal union of a man and woman as husband and wife” and most people
naturally assume that the rules regarding marriage in the textbooks refer to the
same state. A moment’s consideration, however, will show that this is not
necessarily correct. Astrology is concerned with fundamental facts and princi
ples, and deals with the laws of nature rather than the varying customs of
different civilizations.
The legality or otherwise of a union is a matter of very secondary importance
from the point of view of the horoscope, and it is a mistake to assume that
indications pointing to marriage necessarily imply any kind of religious or civil
ceremony as a prelude to union or cohabitation.
It would be incorrect to say that no distinction can be traced in the
horoscope between regular and irregular unions, as will be seen later, but it
should always be borne in mind that for astrological purposes the word mar
riage is to be taken in its widest sense as covering all unions, irrespective of
their legal standing.
In dealing with the question of marriage in a horoscope two lines of
approach are always necessary. The horoscope must first of all be examined in
detail to determine the individual desire and fitness for marriage and the kind
of experiences the married state is likely to bring. The other necessary consid
eration is the horoscope of the proposed partner, not only from the point of
view of his or her own character and matrimonial prospects, but also from that
of the amount and nature of the harmony or disharmony linking the two maps.
It is not always easy to determine whether certain matrimonial afflictions
will cause disharmony between the partners, or whether they will introduce
trouble from outside without upsetting the affections. In a general way, of
course, afflictions from cardinal signs and angles may be expected to exercise
a powerful effect through events, while those in fixed signs and succedent
houses will act more directly upon the affections, and those in mutable signs
and cadent houses upon the mental outlook. But the problem cannot be settled
quite so simply as this, for the effect will vary in accordance with the way in
which the individual horoscopes interact. If there are strongly harmonious
links between the maps the afflictions will, as always, tend to take the line of
least resistance, and cause trouble through money, health, and other matters
that do depend upon the affections. On the other hand, in cases where the
horoscopes conflict, much of the evil effect will come out through domestic
disharmony and incompatibility as well as through external causes.
If one is fortunate enough to be born at a time when the planetary positions
promise a brilliant and happy marriage, the comparison of maps is not of so
much importance, for the right partner will be chosen automatically. But in the
majority of cases where the influences are mixed it becomes essential to com
pare the horoscopes very carefully, not so much with a view to obtaining an
ideal union, which would be impossible in such circumstances, as to ensure
that the line along which trouble is threatened is not one of major importance.
The first step, however, is to obtain a thorough understanding of the
individual horoscope in its relation to marriage, and for this we need to know
the general influence of all the astrological factors in this connection. It is not,
I think, generally recognized that every planet, sign, and house has some effect
upon each and every department of life. There is a tendency to overlook this
fact because certain positions are of much greater importance than others in
regard to any given department, and it is possible for the sake of simplicity to
limit the inquiry to these particular factors. Thus in the case of marriage there
is a tendency to look to the luminaries, Venus, Mars, and the seventh house,
and ignore everything else except such aspecting planets as there may be.
In the preceding pages I have dealt with the influence of planets in the
seventh house in considerable detail, but the other factors cannot be treated in
quite the same way. A very great number of positions in a horoscope have a
direct or indirect influence upon marriage, but they are often of a rather
miscellaneous nature, and do not lend themselves very readily to systematic
treatment. I have therefore collected them together into a separate chapter and
classified them so that they may be easily referred to when any particular
horoscope is being examined.
Reverting to the question of the legality of unions, I mentioned that it was
often quite possible to discriminate between them in the horoscope, although
astrology is not concerned with man-made laws that differ in different ages
and races.
In normal cases where the afflicting aspects are not of a serious nature a
legal marriage will always result, for this is the natural course of events in our
present civilization. This appears to contradict my statement that astrology
ignores convention, for it may be argued that such cannot be the case when
good aspects indicate a legal marriage, and bad ones either deny marriage
altogether or produce another union. Actually, however, good and bad aspects
do not indicate planetary approval or disapproval of the legality' of the union.
A legal marriage is in entire conformity with all laws and customs, and therefore
commands respect and is accorded privileges. An irregular union, on the other
hand, is a violation of custom and tradition, and therefore can meet with
opposition and encounter difficulties. The horoscope reflects these conditions
of life in each case so that the bad aspects indicate the obstacles built up by the
unconventional union, and in some cases the unconventional outlook, or
material hindrances that prevent legal marriage. In other words they are really
a picture of events and the natives reaction to them rather than a commentary
upon his or her morals.
Serious afflictions in a horoscope will prevent marriage altogether if they
are sufficiently strong and involve barren signs, but if the signs occupied are
fruitful ones and there appears to be a desire for marriage, the afflictions will
tend to influence conditions of the union. The problem of deciding the legality
or otherwise of the natives sexual associations is one that can only be left to
the individual judgment, for no very definite rules can possibly be formulated
to cover such a wide and complicated subject.
In practice one can assume marriage unless the significators are badly
afflicted. If that should be the case, however, and it is judged that the afflictions
are not sufficiently severe to deny marriage, the likelihood of an irregular union
should always be borne in mind.
Apart from these general considerations, however, there is a certain amount
of information available in regard to unions other than legal ones.
Chapter XIII: Irregular Unions
Ptolemy tells us that “other varieties in the married state” are to be
determined by a consideration of Venus, Mars, and Saturn. If these planets are
in good aspect with the luminaries the union will be an harmonious one. The
strength or weakness of Jupiter, however, is an important consideration in
regard to the legality of cohabitation, for Jupiter is the planet of religion and of
forms and ceremonies. Afflictions to Jupiter and to the ninth house tend to
encourage irregular unions, and so does Uranus when aspecting the marriage
significators. But there is an underlying difference in the reasons for irregularity
according which planet is responsible for it. In the case of Uranus, extreme
unconventionality, such as is common in artistic and Bohemian circles, is
usually the cause of an irregular union, whereas with Jupiter or Saturn an
existing marriage is more often the cause. Afflictions from Neptune may also
have the effect of causing irregular unions, but as a rule there is a marked
element of deceit coupled with duality. In the case of Uranus no attempt may
be made to conceal the true state of affairs from the world at large. In that of
Jupiter and Saturn both parties will usually be aware of the reason for irregu
larity, but the whole position will be carefully concealed.
With Neptune, however, it is quite probable that only one of the parties,
usually the man, will be aware of any irregularity at all, as for example in cases
where a man keeps two establishments and two wives, each ignorant of the
others existence.
Throughout his remarks on irregular unions, Ptolemy takes Venus as the
prime significator for women as well as for men, and appears to treat Mars and
Saturn as equivalent to one another in their influence when aspecting Venus,
the difference being that Mars indicates events in youth or a young partner,
while Saturn denotes events in later life or an older partner.
A great many of the illegal unions described by Ptolemy are not such as
would be met with nowadays except in extremely rare and degenerate cases,
but, as Wilson said, “Ptolemy wrote like an Egyptian, among whom such
incestuous commerce was common.” For the sake of completeness, however, I
include the substance of all his observations.
Should Venus be in aspect with Mars, each planet being in the other’s house
or exaltation, as for example Venus in Scorpio or Capricorn, and Mars in Libra
or Pisces, there will be intercourse with a brother or sister, or a blood relation.
If at the same time Venus is with the Moon in a man’s horoscope he will form
a union with two sisters or other near relatives; while Venus with Jupiter in a
woman’s horoscope will cause union with two brothers.
Venus in aspect with Saturn, each planet being in the others house or
exaltation, also indicates union between relatives. When the aspect is formed
in the Midheaven or Ascendant and the Moon is in conjunction with the
angular planet, men will have intercourse with their mothers, maternal aunts,
or sons-in-law. In a woman’s horoscope it denotes intercourse with sons, neph
ews, and sons-in-law.
If, however, the Sun instead of the Moon is conjoined with the angular
planet, and especially if Venus and Mars precede the Sun in the zodiac, men
will have intercourse with their daughters or daughters-in-law; and women
with their fathers, paternal , or sons-in-law. When these positions are in
feminine houses or signs, the latter not necessarily related by house or exaltation
to the planets concerned, the obscenity and shamelessness of the association
will be increased, especially if fixed stars of the nature of Saturn or are involved.
Should Venus and Saturn be in the Ascendant or Midheaven, the nature of
the association will become public, but should they be in the fourth or seventh
house the native may be impotent or a eunuch.
The value of all these rules is extremely questionable, and it would need a
very bad horoscope indeed to justify their consideration, though one occasion
ally hears of degenerate cases in which such incestuous unions have taken
place. I have never had the opportunity of examining such a case astrologically,
however, and therefore cannot confirm or deny any of the rules. They appear
to me to be far too simple, and the positions of far too common occurrence, to
be of much value nowadays, though in Ptolemy’s time, or in that ol the authors
from whom he copied, they may have been quite valid.
Ihe rules regarding the indications accompanying incestuous unions given
by certain ancient Hindu authors are equally scanty and unconvincing. I know
of only two Hindu rules and the subject is not touched upon in most Indian
works. Both these rules deal with incest with the mother, and are similar in
nature. In one case we are told that if the fourth house is afflicted, presumably
by bad aspects to the cusp, and the Moon or Venus is in an angle afflicted by a
malefic, there will be intercourse with the mother. In the other case it is said
that the same result follows when the fourth cusp is aspected by a malefic and
the Sun is in an angle, or the Moon is conjoined with one malefic and afflicted
by another.
Summarizing the conclusions that emerge from these rules, we can safely
assume that illegal and incestuous unions follow severe angular afflictions from
Mars, Saturn, Uranus, or Neptune to the appropriate luminary; that Venus will
also be badly placed by sign and house and heavily afflicted; and that the house
or its ruler signifying the relative concerned will be closely involved in the
afflictions.
Chapter XIV: Marriage or Celibacy
The question of whether marriage will take place or not in any given case
depends for its answer upon several factors, the balancing up of which is not
always by any means an easy task. It is, however, made slightly easier than it
might otherwise be by the fact that in normal cases there is a bias in favor of
marriage so that stronger influences are needed to prevent it than to bring it
about.
The problem is not quite the same in the case of women as it is in that of
men, although astrological authors have never differentiated between them
except in regard to the significators to be used.
Men’s Marriages
The chief significators to be studied in the case of men are the Moon, Venus,
and the seventh house; and the problem consists in determining whether these
factors are sufficiently weak or afflicted either to prevent marriage taking place
or to remove the desire for it. Before examining these significators, however, it
is always advisable to get a general idea of the nature of the person with whom
one is dealing, or in other words to study the character as indicated in the
horoscope. It is beyond the scope of the present book to enter into any expla
nation of the general judgment of a map, but a good deal of indirect information
as to character will be found in other chapters, and especially in that dealing
with the influence of the rising sign. If a preliminary idea is obtained of the
native’s outlook upon sex and marriage, subsequent judgment is rendered
considerably easier.
For the study of marriage and fertility the division of the signs of the zodiac
into barren and fruitful groups is of importance. According to the ancient
astrologers the barren signs are Gemini, Leo, and Virgo, and the fruitful ones
are Cancer, Scorpio, and Pisces, but the beginner is often embarrassed by the
absence of any information as to the nature of the six signs not included in
these groups. On the whole they may be considered as without marked influ
ence upon fertility, but for the sake of those who would appreciate some
guidance, even of a tentative nature, the following classification is suggested.
Barren Semi-barren Semi-fruitful Fruitful
Gemini Aries Taurus Cancer
Leo Sagittarius Libra Scorpio
Virgo Capricorn Aquarius Pisces
In order to judge whether marriage will take place it is necessary to study
the sign and house positions of the marriage signifkators and the nature of the
seventh and certain other houses. The whole matter turns upon the strength
and amount of affliction received by these.
It is best to start by examining the Moon and Venus, and noting the signs
and houses they occupy. They are most favorably disposed to marriage when
in the fruitful signs, and least favorably in the barren ones. In regard to house
position the angular houses are the strongest, and the succedent ones come
next, but from the point of view of marriage the more elevated the position
occupied by Venus and the Moon the better. Perhaps the best houses for them
are the tenth, eleventh, and first. The fourth, fifth, and seventh are also good
positions, but in the case of the last two much depends upon the fruitfulness
of the sign and the nature of the aspects received. These houses being primarily
concerned with love and marriage are particularly sensitive, and barren signs
and afflictions are worse here than elsewhere.
The most unfavorable houses for the Moon and Venus are the twelfth, sixth,
and eighth, all of which tend to hinder marriage.
The aspects to the Moon and Venus are the next factors to be considered.
The worst possible afflictions are bad aspects from Saturn and Uranus, partic
ularly if barren signs are involved. Afflictions from Mars are not by any means
so serious. They may stir up the passionate side of the nature far too much, and
create matrimonial quarrels, but they alone will not prevent marriage.
In a general way any influence that tends to increase isolation affords the
greatest threat to marriage, while influences of a gregarious nature tend to
bring it about most easily. Thus the twelfth, sixth, and eighth houses are all of
an isolating nature. The twelfth acts as a prison to the planets occupying it, the
sixth holds them in servitude, and the eighth kills them. On the other hand.
houses such as the tenth, eleventh, fifth, and seventh are intimately concerned
with the affairs of other people and encourage contact with others instead of
preventing it.
Again from the point of view of the aspecting planets, Saturn is limiting
and isolating in its effect, while Uranus is even more so, though in a rather
different way. Mars, on the other hand, does not isolate; if afflicted, it will at
least go out and quarrel with someone and not shut itself up in the manner of
Saturn.
For an early marriage it is rather an advantage than otherwise to have no
aspects between the significators and Saturn and Uranus, though good aspects
may be very useful in married life. An aspect from Mars to Venus, however, is
always desirable, and tends to hasten marriage.
Having decided whether the significators tend to favor marriage or not,
look over the rest of the map, and pay special attention to the ascendant and
seventh house. Barren signs here act against marriage, while fruitful signs favor
it, as do good aspects between the rulers of the first and seventh, and good
aspects from Jupiter and Mars to these planets and the significators. Ifiere is
no decisive factor in the matter, however, and the final conclusion as to whether
marriage will take place or not must be arrived at by balancing up the pros and
cons, not merely numerically but with an eye to the importance and strength
of each indication.
Women’s Marriages
I mentioned the fact that the problem varied slightly according to the sex
of the native. In the case of a woman the aspects can more easily prevent not
only marriage but all sexual experiences, and can more easily suppress the
normal desire for marriage in the case of a man. In a mans horoscope particular
attention should be paid to any positions denoting a solitary life, such as strong
twelfth house afflictions, an unaspected ruler, or seventh house ruler, a domi
nant Saturn or Uranus, and a marked absence of fruitful signs. If such tendencies
are not paramount the afflictions in the map will not deny sexual experiences
and irregular unions, though they may prevent legal marriage. This is especially
the case if Jupiter joins in the afflictions.
In a woman’s horoscope, on the other hand, the normal desire for marriage
may be destroyed by strong influences tending to cause idealism such as are
given by Libra; intense love of freedom as is given by Sagittarius or Aries; or an
innate virginity, due usually to Virgo. In cases of this kind, afflictions to the
marriage signifkators can entirely prevent marriage and sex experiences. If,
however, the character is a more normal one, afflictions will prevent marriage
if barrenness predominates; but should the afflictions involve fruitful signs they
may, while preventing legal marriage, lead to an irregular union, or even to
prostitution if sufficiently strong.
Apart from considerations of this kind, the methods to be adopted in
examining the marriage prospects in a woman’s horoscope are the same as in
the case of a man’s. The planetary significators differ, however, for the Sun and
Mars must be consulted for a woman instead of the Moon and Venus.
It is therefore necessary to study the Sun and Mars in exactly the same way
and by the same rules as the Moon and Venus are studied in a mans horoscope.
If the Sun and Mars are strong and elevated in fruitful signs in aspect with and
not afflicted by Saturn and Uranus, marriage will take place. On the other hand,
marriage will be hindered or entirely prevented if the Sun and Mars are in no
aspect to each other and are situated in barren signs or weak houses and
afflicted by Saturn or Uranus from barren signs. The value of the houses is the
same as in a man’s horoscope.
These indications are respectively the best and worst that may be found,
and because most horoscopes will show a mixture of good and bad, an attempt
must be made to balance the conflicting indications and find out which set
preponderates.
Chapter XV: Determining the Date of Marriage
Having decided that the horoscope indicates marriage, or at least does not
deny it, the significators should be again examined with a view to determining
the approximate period of life at which marriage is to be expected. This depends
upon the general fruitfulness or barrenness of the signs containing the signifi
cators, and the amount of affliction they receive.
Men’s Marriages
The first consideration is the position of the Moon in relation to the Sun. If
the Moon is passing from new to first quarter or from full to last quarter, it
indicates that the native will marry at an early age. There is, however, an
alternative to this, and that is that he will marry a young woman after he has
reached or passed his prime. As a rule, other position in the horoscope will
furnish a clue as to which alternative is to be expected.
Indications of delay afforded by the other significators, for example, will
point to the second alternative as the more likely one, just as indications of a
wife who is older than the native will point to an early marriage in accordance
with the first and more usual alternative.
If the Moon should be passing from last quarter to new, or from first quarter
to full the native will tend to marry late in life, or a woman older than himself.
Here again the more probable alternative must be selected by a consideration
of the other significators.
If the Moon is actually in conjunction with the Sun, marriage will usually
be greatly delayed and may even be denied altogether if Saturn afflicts and
barren signs are involved.
Women’s Marriages
The position of the Sun in the quadrants of the map is here to be taken as
the guide. If the Sun is in houses four, five, six, ten, eleven, or twelve the native
will tend to marry at an early age; or, alternatively, at a later age she will marry
a man some years her junior. Should the Sun be in houses one, two, three,
seven, eight, or nine, however, she will marry comparatively late in life, or will
marry a middle-aged or elderly man while she is still quite young.
Just as in the case of mens marriages, it is necessary to examine the strength
or weakness of the other significators in order to determine the alternative to
be adopted in the particular horoscope under consideration. It is not possible
to obtain any idea of the exact age at which marriage will take place merely
from a general study of the birth positions alone. The terms early and late in
these rules are considered to mean either less or more than 30 years of age.
In addition to the above indications based upon the position of the
luminaries, it is necessary to examine the strength and weakness of the marriage
significators common to both sexes. The methods to be adopted are the same
as were used in estimating the likelihood of marriage, for in practice the process
is a single rather than a double one. A late marriage may be judged when the
barrenness or affliction of the significators does not seem severe enough to
deny marriage altogether, and conversely an early marriage is indicated when
the significators are well aspected in fruitful signs. The general principle is that
the greater the affliction and barrenness of the horoscope, the later will be the
age at which marriage takes place, if it does so it all.
Some special rules referring to this subject of inquiry will be found in
Chapter XXV.
In order to discover the exact age at which marriage will occur it is necessary
to work out the directional influences for the approximate period of life indi
cated by the general rules already outlined. According to the ancient astrologers,
marriage was to be expected when the cusp of the seventh house or its ruler
came to the conjunction or aspect of the Moon, Venus, or the ruler of the
Ascendant. While these directions conduce to marriage, however, they are not
the most common indicators of that event.
In the case of men, marriage is most frequently shown by directions of the
Midheaven, Ascendant, or Sun to the conjunction or favorable aspect of Venus
or the Moon, and, though less commonly, by aspects from the Midheaven,
Ascendant, Sun or Moon to a planet in the seventh house or the ruler of that
house. The lunar aspects meriting serious consideration are those formed by
the Primary or Radix Systems, and not the monthly lunar aspects of the
Secondary System. The latter may coincide with more important influences,
and stimulate them into activity in a certain month, but by themselves they are
far too weak to be considered as marriage indicators.
In the case of women, the most important directions for marriage are those
of the Ascendant or Midheaven to the Sun or Mars, and solar directions to
Mars and sometimes Jupiter.
It should be remembered that marriage is not always indicated by favorable
directions. A strong afflicting aspect between, say, the Moon and Mars in a
man’s horoscope, or the Sun and Uranus in a woman’s, will not infrequently
produce marriage, but needless to say a union entered into under such aspects
cannot fail to be disastrous in some way. Nevertheless, when the horoscope
indicates an unhappy marriage, the likelihood of its taking place under bad
directions must not be overlooked. It does not follow from this, however, that
an unhappy marriage must necessarily take place under bad directions, and I
have known several cases of separation and divorce in which marriage took
place under sextiles and trines from the significators to Venus and the Moon.
If these planets are seriously afflicted at birth a good direction will indicate no
more than temporary pleasure and happiness that will disappear as soon as the
direction passes out of orbs, allowing the radical afflictions to come into play
once more.
The interpretation of directions is a process that bristles with difficulties. It
is usual to consider that bad directions hinder the matters they threaten, but
this is sometimes quite a false assumption. If a certain action is shown by the
birth horoscope to be an unwise one, a bad direction will most probably bring
it about, while on the other hand a good direction may also have the same
effect by presenting a picture of rosy prospects. The safest line of conduct is to
avoid doing anything threatened by a bad direction, at least until the direction
has passed off, and to scrutinize the birth indications very thoroughly before
rushing into something favored by a good direction. A wider appreciation of
this rule would save a great deal of trouble and sorrow, not only in marriage
but in every other department as well.
The timing of events is another aspect of the directional problem that is apt
to lead one into error. To the best of my knowledge no astrologer has ever
drawn attention to the important fact that a direction measures to the birth of
an event and not necessarily to the actual happening itself. In many cases, and
perhaps in the majority, there is not sufficient difference in time between the
two moments to affect the timing of a prediction, but there are occasions in
which the difference is sufficiently considerable to make the timing appear
quite incorrect.
My attention was first drawn to this matter many years ago by a particularly
striking case. It was that of a native in whose horoscope a strongly adverse
aspect between the Sun and Uranus, clearly threatening loss of employment,
was due to operate in March of that particular year. March came and went
without any apparent rouble, and by the late summer the native concluded that
the danger was past and that the direction had unaccountably failed to work.
In September, however, six months after the indicated danger period, he was
told by his firm that his services would no longer be required. As a result of a
number of discreet inquiries it transpired that the decision to dismiss the native
in September had been taken at a director s meeting in March. This immediately
suggested the idea that the timing of the direction was perfectly correct after
all, but that it indicated what 1 have called the birth of the event, and not the
date at which it actually took place or at which the native was aware of it. I have
tested this conclusion many times since then and have never had occasion to
modify it.
The fact that a direction indicates the time of the beginning and not the
end of an event is sometimes of considerable importance in the prediction of
the date of marriage, though it is less so now than it was in the days when a
long engagement was fashionable. A study of the horoscopes of a number of
cases in which a long engagement took place will show that the most important
marriage directions measured to the date of engagement. Sometimes marriage
is also indicated fairly strongly, but it is not at all uncommon to find horoscopes
in which marriage takes place without any particularly appropriate directions
at all. This is not surprising however, when one realizes that directions indicate
the beginning of events; in the case of marriage this is the date of engagement.
It is to this moment that the directions normally measure, and not marriage
itself, so that strong marriage indications should be looked upon as denoting
either marriage or events resulting in marriage. The actual date of marriage
itself is probably best determined from a horoscope for the moment of engage
ment, the acceptance woman of the proposal.
Chapter XVI: The Marriage Partner
The selection of the planet presenting the marriage partner in a horoscope
is a matter that gives rise to a great deal of uncertainty and confusion in the
mind of the student, owing to the extremely unsatisfactory textbook rules. We
are told that in a man’s horoscope the wife is denoted by the planet to which
the Moon applies, and in a womans horoscope the husband is represented by
the planet to which the Sun applies. This is quite a straightforward rule so far
as the Moon is concerned, but when we come to the Sun we encounter the first
difficulty, for if we are to consider only the planets to which the Sun applies we
are forced to exclude the Moon, Mercury, and Venus, which can never indicate
the husband unless, in the case of the latter planets, they happen to be retro
grade. The only way round this obvious absurdity is to treat all the planets in
the horoscope as fixed, and move the Sun round to them, as is done in
directional processes, but no writer has ever suggested that this method should
be adopted, and the use of ephemeral rather than directional motion has always
been implicitly understood.
Even here, however, our difficulties are not at an end, for we are also told
that the marriage partner is denoted by the seventh house and any planets in
it, together with the ruler of that house. If all these rules are to be followed it is
clearly quite possible for every planet to be involved, so that it behooves us to
try to reduce this chaos into some kind of order.
If we turn to Ptolemy, who is the fountainhead from which most of our
rules spring, we find that he ignores the seventh house altogether and considers
only the solar and lunar aspects. In the chapter on marriage, he states, “With
regard to men, it is to be observed in what manner the Moon may be dis
posed___ Should she be in a sign of single form, and in application to only one
of the planets, she will cause man to marry only once; but if she be in a
bicorporeal or multiform sign, or in application to several planets, she will then
cause them to be married several times; and, provided also that the planets
which thus, either by conjunction or aspect receive her application, be benefic,
men will then obtain good wives; but if, on the contrary, the said planets be
malefic, bad.”
He then proceeds to describe the effect of each planet as significator of the
wife, and continues: “But, in the case of women, the Sun must be observed
instead of the Moon. . . . And should the Sun be in a sign of single form, or
configured with only one oriental planet, he will cause them to enter to matri
mony only once; but if in a bicorporeal or multiform sign, or configurated with
several oriental planets, he will then cause them to be often married.”
When adopting the rules laid down by an authority it is always advisable
to apply them not only correctly but intelligently as well. Unfortunately, a great
many of Ptolemy’s rules have been mutilated and misinterpreted by his follow
ers, and those quoted above have fared no better than many of the others. First
of all it will be seen that while Ptolemy speaks everywhere of the Moon’s
applications, he nowhere specifies application in the case of the Sun. According
to him we are to consider those planets to which the Moon applies or with
which the Sun is in aspect. This immediately disposes of the first difficulty I
mentioned.
There is, however, an implication to be drawn from this, and that is that the
planets to which the Moon applies should already be in aspect with her.
Selection is made among the planets aspecting the Moon by application, just
as it is made among those aspecting the Sun by orientality.
Again, by his suggestion that she may be approaching one planet only,
Ptolemy implies that the Moon is to be considered solely in regard to the sign
she occupies at the moment of birth, and that her applications must not carry
her into the next sign, which of course would go without saying if the planet
receiving the application were already in aspect, unless the Moon were in a last
degree of a sign.
Some authors, notably Pearce and Simmonite, state that in cases where the
appropriate luminary aspects several planets, the latter should all be situation
in one sign. This addition to Ptolemy’s rule was originally made by Cardan and
does not appear to be of very much value. No doubt the presence of such a
group of planets, especially in a mutable sign in aspect with the Sun or Moon,
complicates the marriage indications and tends to increase the likelihood of
more than one marriage, but such grouping is not an essential condition for
multiple marriages.
In the case of the solar aspects, Ptolemy, while entirely disregarding
application, introduces the question of orientality, which most authors have
ignored. Our present use of the term oriental is quite loose and only partially
correct. In the sense in which Ptolemy used it, the major planets Mars, Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto are oriental when the Sun is passing from
its conjunction with them to its opposition to them, or in other words, when it
is receding from them.
Similarly, the minor planets Mercury and Venus are oriental when they are
behind the Sun in the zodiac. The significator of the husband in a woman’s
horoscope is therefore a planet in aspect with the Sun and in an oriental
position, the planet with the closest aspect presumably being the first signifi
cator.
We can summarize Ptolemy’s complete rules as follows: 1. In a man’s
horoscope the wife is indicated by that planet with which the Moon is in aspect,
provided the aspect be an applying one. Should the Moon be in Gemini,
Sagittarius, or Pisces or in aspect with and applying to more than one planet,
several marriages are indicated, the wives being denoted by the respective
planets in the order in which the Moon’s aspects to them are formed. 2. In a
woman’s horoscope the husband is indicated by that planet with which the Sun
is in aspect, provided it is situated behind the Sun in the zodiac and is not more
than 180 degrees distant. Should the Sun be in Gemini, Sagittarius, or Pisces,
or in aspect with more than one planet situated in the manner described,
several marriages are indicated, the husbands being denoted by the respective
planets in the order in which the Sun’s aspect to them or their aspects to the
Sun are formed.
A very interesting point in Ptolemy’s rules is that the nature of the aspect
made by the Sun or Moon to the significant planet is not taken into consider
ation at all, any aspect to a benefic planet indicating a good husband or wife,
and any aspect to a malefic, a bad one.
According to him the chief point to be observed is the nature of the aspects
the planet receives from other planets, and whether it is afflicted or not apart
from its aspect to the Sun or Moon, as the case may be.
This is of course an important consideration, but at the same time we are
not justified in entirely ignoring the nature of the aspect to the luminary. An
adverse aspect will result in difficulties in courtship and in all the circumstances
leading up to marriage, while it will also render the harmony between the
partners more easily disturbed. On the other hand, a good aspect will corre
spondingly improve conditions, and conduce to a happier and more successful
marriage.
The following descriptions summarize the details given by Ptolemy and
later authors on the effect of the lunar applications and solar aspects.
The Lunar Applications
To Saturn. A grave, morose, austere, laborious, troublesome wife. If Saturn
is in the seventh house, little comfort. If Saturn is well aspected the wife will be
industrious and careful, but poor and of weak health. Saturn in detriment
indicates a wife of low social status, and if he afflicts the ruler of the seventh
house she will be immodestly inclined, especially if the ruler of the seventh is
situated in the twelfth.
To Jupiter. A decorous, well-conducted, modest, economical, and
domesticated wife with whom there will be close harmony if Jupiter is in the
seventh house and unafflicted. If afflicted she may virtuous but “her virtues
will be clouded and she will make no show of them by reason of some blemish
or other cast upon her.” If Jupiter is well aspected in the eighth house, the wife
will be rich; but if afflicted, extravagant.
To Mars. A bold, quick-tempered, and refractory wife, desirous of mastery,
but a true friend. If afflicted she will be vicious, quarrelsome, and arrogant. If
in bad aspect with Venus she will be licentious and lustful. It is said that if Mars
and Venus are both in aspect to Jupiter, and Mars is in conjunction with the
Sun, she will commit misconduct with social inferiors, while if Venus instead
of Mars is with the Sun it will be with people of higher rank.
To Venus. A cheerful, handsome, and agreeable wife, but if afflicted, one
who is arrogant, wasteful, prodigal, extravagant, talkative, and inclined to be
dishonest. If Venus is in aspect with Jupiter, Saturn, or Mercury, she will be
provident and attached to her husband and children; but if Venus aspects Mars
she will be irascible, unsteady, and indiscreet. If Venus is in good aspect with
Jupiter or Mercury the wife will be temperate and control her desires. Venus in
the seventh denotes a good housewife, and in the eighth, especially if ruling
that house, a rich wife, but this can only be the case if Venus is well aspected.
To Mercury. A sensible, prudent, and clever wife provided Mercury is
strong and free from affliction. If Mercury is afflicted however, she will be
malicious, a thief, gossip, liar, chatterer, and stirrer up of discord and strife.
The Solar Aspects
To Saturn. A steady, industrious, grave, but cold and phlegmatic husband.
If the Sun, Saturn and Mercury are all in favorable aspect he will be well off,
and the marriage will be a profitable one.
To Jupiter. An honorable, kind, noble-minded, honest, and generous
husband. If Jupiter is afflicted there is danger of separation after marriage, and
of adultery on the part of the husband. This is- said to be a certainty if Jupiter
is in Pisces close to, or just below, the cusp of the seventh house, but I cannot
vouch for the accuracy of this statement.
To Mars. A severe, passionate, arbitrary, intractable, and quick-tempered
husband. Ptolemy says he will be void of affection, but this is not correct,
though the affection may manifest itself in very peculiar and often unpleasant
ways. If Mars is weak and the Sun is afflicted by Uranus or Saturn, the result
may be an irregular union.
To Venus. An amiable and handsome husband. According to Ptolemy the
aspects to Venus are of importance in indicating the type of husband, whether
she be his significator or not. Thus if Venus is in aspect with Saturn the husband
will be dull and timid; if with Jupiter, he will be good, just, and modest; if with
Mars, hasty, lustful, and adulterous; and if with Mercury, immodest, and ex
travagantly desirous of young persons, or homosexual.
To Mercury. A provident, and clever husband with good business abilities.
It will be noticed that Ptolemy omits all consideration of aspects between
the Sun and Moon themselves and evidently assumes that the Sun in a man’s
horoscope and the Moon in a womans are never to be taken as significators of
the wife or husband respectively. Ibis is based upon the idea that luminaries
are collectors and distributors of influences, and that it is the planets that denote
persons and happenings. Theoretically this may be sound, but in actual practice
one constantly finds that the luminaries indicate events when aspecting each
other. It would therefore be safer to include the Sun and Moon as significators
of the wife and husband should the rules of application or aspect indicate them.
To be eligible for selection the Moon should presumably be situated orientally
in regard to the Sun, or behind the Sun in the zodiac, rather than one of her
own positions of orientality.
I have not entered into much detail in the above descriptions of the
applications and aspects, nor have I included the luminaries, Uranus, or Nep
tune, because the details already given about the effect of each of the planets in
the seventh house will serve equally well so far as they refer to the nature,
character, and circumstances of the marriage partner, and may be applied
directly to the planet indicated by the Moon’s application or the Sun’s aspect.
The above examination of Ptolemy’s rules settles most, if not all, of the
uncertainty that has attached to their exact use, but it does not, unfortunately,
cover all the variations met with in practice. Most astrologers must have
encountered horoscopes in which the wife has been indicated by the planet
from which the Moon last separated. This is one of the apparent anomalies that
occur from time to time and can best be disregarded except by the research
worker. It is probably due to the strength of the planet concerned or to some
special factor such as a close aspect to Venus, which increases its importance.
I have also known it to occur when the planet was the only one in conjunction
with the Moon, although there were several in applying aspect. As a rule it is
possible to discover the reason for any given variation in a special case, but any
attempt to cover such anomalies by a set of rules is quite impossible in our
present state of knowledge, and it is much better in practice to adhere to the
general rules and be content to err in exceptional cases.
The Seventh House
Having settled the exact method of dealing with solar and lunar aspects,
we come to the second much more difficult problem: namely, whether marriage
partner is indicated by the rules we have just examined, or whether the true
significator given by the seventh house, the planets therein, ruler of the seventh,
or the planets aspecting cusp.
This problem is one that has puzzled many generations of astrologers, if
one may judge by the various ways in which successive authors have attempted
to harmonize the two methods. Most of seventeenth century astrologers
adopted the idea that the planet selected by the Sun or Moon denotes the
character of the marriage partner, while the seventh house and its occupant or
ruler describe his or her appearance and general conditions. This strikes one
as a very artificial rule based upon quite arbitrary and unsound distinctions,
but at a period when horary astrology was paramount. Psychological and purely
rational considerations could not expected to outweigh the desire for rigid
rules.
Another and rather more reasonable attempt to solve the problem resulted
in a rule that the seventh house with all its accessories indicates the marriage
partner if there is no planet fulfilling the Ptolemaic rules of application and
aspect. The practical effect of this, however, is to cut out the seventh house
altogether in most cases, for a significator can usually be found by the former
rules.
A third line of attack again aimed at blending the two methods, but avoided
the crudity7 of the earlier attempt. We were told that the successive solar aspects
or lunar applications represent successive love affairs and attachments and that
marriage is indicated by the application to a planet in the seventh house or the
ruler of that house. This is ingenious, but it merely avoids the issue because it
is equivalent to saying that the marriage partner is indicated by the seventh
house and that the Ptolemaic rules denote nothing more than love affairs.
In regard to the latter implication, there is no doubt that a great deal of
truth attaches to the idea that all the lunar applications, for example, do not
represent marriages, for the application to a planet that is weak or badly afflicted
frequently denotes a broken engagement.
The most recent, and perhaps the best, approach to the problem has been
put forward by Carter, who suggests that the lunar applications indicate the
circumstances leading up to marriage, while the seventh house indicates the
partner. This appears sound so far as it goes, but it is not, and was of course
never intended to be a complete answer to the problem.
It does not seem to be at all logical to consider the seventh house to any
extent before marriage. Moreover, that house is concerned primarily with
matrimonial conditions and the fortunes of partnership, the description of the
partner being only of secondary importance. Not until the partner has been
chosen and the partnership inaugurated does the seventh house become of
chief importance, and it is therefore reasonable to assume that the lunar and
solar aspects must refer rather to the choice of partner and the general circum
stances leading up to the point where the seventh house continues the story,
namely the moment of marriage. If so, the applications and aspects must be
considered the primary factors in denoting not only the wife or husband but
also any earlier engagements that may have taken place, as well as second and
subsequent marriages. This gives us a clear-cut signifkator for each partner
and avoids the confusion attendant upon any attempt to define successive
marriages by a consideration of the seventh house.
(As a development of this idea, I suggest that a reversal of the factors,
namely the use of the Suns aspects in a mans horoscope and the Moon’s
application in a womans, should indicate business partners and associates of
the same sex, thus affording a useful means of discriminating between business
and marriage partners.)
Assuming that this is correct we have decide upon the exact value attaching
to the seventh house, its ruler, occupants, and aspecting planets. To take the
latter first, I think we can safely disregard the planets aspecting the cusp of the
seventh so far as the description of the partner is concerned. They cannot be
of primary importance, and the most they can do is to introduce complications
leading to confusion of judgment.
Quite apart from the argument already advanced, it is clear that the seventh
house cannot be relied upon to furnish an accurate description of the marriage
partner. If there were no such thing as a second marriage it might do so, but
the description of a second partner, to say nothing of the succession of partners
common in the film world, cannot possibly be indicated by the planet ruling
an empty seventh house. It may be argued that several planets in the seventh
would meet the case, but unfortunately the planets are not usually so obligingly
arranged for the convenience of the astrologer.
Against this it must be admitted that the seventh house does describe the
marriage partner in a large number of cases.
I think the answer to this difficulty lies in the exact nature and functions of
the seventh house itself. Disregarding for the moment the various rulerships of
that house over matters unconnected with marriage, we may say that the
seventh house refers primarily to marriage itself and the partnership period of
married life, as I have already indicated in a previous chapter. If this is the case
planets here or the aspects to the ruler will indicate the factors that make or
mar the partnership. In the majority of cases the husband or wife is the chief
factor to be considered in this respect, and therefore will be fairly clearly
indicated, but always in terms relative to the fortunes of marriage. It follows
from this that the seventh house will describe the partner as he or she will
affect married life, or, alternatively, it will indicate external forces acting upon
marriage and ignore the partner to a greater or lesser extent. This conclusion
is, I think, borne out in practice.
A little thought will show that it opens up many possibilities. Much will
depend, for example, upon the harmony and aspects existing between the
primary significator of the husband or wife and the planets in, or ruler of, the
seventh house—a relationship that may alter entirely with a second marriage.
The whole problem is so complicated that it cannot possibly be reduced to a
set of rules, and each horoscope must always be judged on its own merits.
I should suggest that judgment might proceed on the following lines:
1. Examine the Moon’s applications or the Sun’s aspects in accordance with
the rules already laid down in order to discover the significator of the wife or
husband, and the general conditions leading up to marriage. Weak aspects, or
aspects to a weak planet, unless it happens to be in or ruling the seventh house,
may be taken as denoting attachments rather than marriage.
The first strong application or aspect will indicate the first partner and
subsequent ones will indicate later partners, should the horoscope denote more
than one marriage.
2. Examine the seventh house to discover the harmony and fortunes of
marriage, noting the relationship, if any, that exists between the significator
and the planets in or the ruler of the seventh. If the testimonies of both agree,
consider the latter as joint significators, but if they disagree, take the seventh
house planets as indicating qualities in the partner affecting the marriage or
the external influences that will affect it.
It is, of course, impossible to avoid difficulties and complexities, for
marriage itself bristles with them. One source of difficulty has never been
mentioned so far as I know, and that is the gradually increasing importance of
the seventh house. Assuming that the primary significator of the partner is the
planet selected by the Sun or Moon, the ruler of the seventh and any planets
that may occupy that house will be of little importance before marriage takes
place. That event, however, brings a reorientation of the horoscope that stresses
all the seventh house influences. In consequence these will gradually grow
stronger and the partner will imperceptibly develop in character along the lines
indicated by the seventh, no matter what his or her original character may have
been. After years of marriage the association and the interplay of the seventh
house and other influences will have made such changes in the original char
acter and outlook of each partner that the first significator will have lost much
of its importance, and the seventh house will have taken its place.
This means that the judgment of marriage must always depend to some
extent upon the number of years that have elapsed since the native married. In
the case of an unmarried person, or one quite recently married, the significator
selected by the Sun or Moon will be the one upon which chief stress must be
laid; but in the case of a person who has been married many years the seventh
house will usually afford a better picture of existing conditions. If, however, the
partner dies and the native marries again, the whole process is repeated,
beginning with the primary significator of the second partner, and gradually
passing once more to the seventh house. By examining the horoscope in this
way we can not only determine the general marriage prospects, but also follow
the course along which matrimonial affairs will travel.
Chapter XVII: How to Read Details
One of the most surprising things about astrology is the way in which all
kinds of detail can be obtained about people and things that one would expect
to be quite beyond the province of the horoscope. A horoscope is the life chart
of a particular individual and cannot logically be expected to indicate matters
that appear to be entirely unconnected with that individual, but in actual fact
it unquestionably does so. It is not only possible but easy to determine from a
birth map intimate details about the lives and affairs of the marriage partner’s
family, friends, and dependents with astonishing accuracy.
Before indicating the way in which this can be done, however, there are one
or two details regarding the husband or wife that I should add to the information
already given.
It is said that the house containing the partners significator indicates the
circumstances under which he or she will be met. Thus if the significator is in
the tenth, the meeting will take place through business or at the office; if in the
eleventh, through friends; and if in the third, on a journey, and so on. This is
generally correct if the house rulerships are taken in a wide sense. Thus the
position of the marriage significator in the second house does not necessarily
mean that the future husband or wife will be met during the course of some
financial transaction. The second house is the fourth from the eleventh, or the
home of a friend, and it is much more probable that it would operate along this
line. Again, it is the fifth from the tenth, denoting sports or recreations orga
nized by one’s employers, which is another probable source of introduction.
Each house may thus be viewed from many angles, and while it is often difficult
to state precisely the circumstances of meeting, it will usually be found to be in
keeping with one of the primary or derivative rulerships of the house in which
the significator is situated.
The statement that the significator in the ninth house indicates marriage to
a foreigner should be received with a great deal of caution, and so should all
such rules, most of which will be found in a later chapter. This particular
position may denote marriage to a foreigner, but it could just as easily indicate
a meeting in church or at a university or through friendship with one of the
future partners relatives, or even through an advertisement in a matrimonial
journal, dhe only way to narrow down the possibilities is by a consideration of
the signs involved and the aspects from the other planets.
Hie beginner is apt to think that if the wife happens to be signified by, say,
Venus in Sagittarius, she must necessarily have the sign Sagittarius upon her
Ascendant. This is entirely erroneous. The chances are that this position will
be represented in her map, but in a much more complicated way. She might, of
course, have Sagittarius rising, but usually the matter is not quite so simple and
obvious. Thus Venus might be represented by a Taurus or Libra Ascendant, or
those signs might be strongly occupied or the planet Venus might itself be in
some important position. The Sagittarian influence could come in a similar
sort of way or through a strong aspect from Jupiter. Actually, Venus in Sagit
tarius is a kind of synthesis of the wife’s character as it strikes the native and
may or may not truly represent her as she really is.
The sign containing the partners significator is not necessarily, or even
usually, directly related to the month of his or her birth, or the sign containing
the Sun. dhere is, however, or there appears to be, a relation between the degree
of the zodiac in which the significator is placed and the date of the month in
which the partner was born. Thus the significator in, say, the twenty-second
degree of any sign indicates that the partner’s birthday will probably be within
a day or so of the twenty-second of a month. The fact that the sign gives no
clue whatever to the month suggests that any correspondence in date may be
ascribed to coincidence, but I have observed too many cases in which this
correspondence has been correct to feel justified in ignoring it.
The significator and the sign on the seventh cusp often allow of a suggestion
as to the Christian name or initial of the partner. This involves the use of the
Kabalistic alphabet, the 108 Hindu Sounds, and other factors of a like nature.
But the rules are not sufficiently formulated to justify an explanation that would
necessarily be lengthy.
I have already stated that the problem of reading small details from the
horoscope is not a difficult one, especially after a little practice. The key to
success lies in a thorough knowledge of the rulerships of the signs and a facile
use of derivative house rulership. The latter is a horary method and its employ
ment in nativities has been deprecated by various writers in the past. Never
theless, the work of certain modern students, notably the late M. Eudes Picard
of Paris, has abundantly demonstrated its value when applied to the determi
nation of details from the horoscope.
The process simply consists in renumbering the houses starting from that
which rules the particular person or matter under consideration. Thus, suppose
we require the derivative rulership of the houses in relation to marriage. This
is primarily ruled by the seventh house, and it is therefore necessary to renum
ber the houses from the seventh, which will become No. 1 , the eighth being
No. 2, the ninth No. 3, and so on. This process may be continued indefinitely
and will be found to cover the smallest trivialities with extraordinary accuracy.
To take a ridiculously extreme case, the fifth house would furnish any details
that might be required about a cat owned by the daughter of a charwoman
employed by the wife’s sister-in-law!
This is arrived at as follows: the seventh house is the wife; the ninth (third
from seventh) is her brother; the third (seventh from third from seventh) is his
wife or her sister-in-law; the eighth (sixth from seventh from third from
seventh) is the sister-in-law’s charwoman; the twelfth (fifth from sixth from
seventh from third from seventh) is the charwoman’s daughter; and finally the
fifth (sixth from fifth from sixth from seventh from third from seventh) is the
required cat.
08-$ OS'