1 s2.0 S2666154323000595 Main
1 s2.0 S2666154323000595 Main
1 s2.0 S2666154323000595 Main
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Heavy metal and organic dyes produced in modern industrialization development have polluted the natural
Hydrogel resources human live by due to their adverse effects on all biological organisms. Developing effective,
Adsorption mechanism economical and friendly strategies to tackle environmental pollution has been a hotspot in recent years, among
Pollutant
which adsorption of chemical pollutants from water has been considered of utmost importance. Hydrogel-based
Water treatment
adsorbents with three-dimensional porous structures and versatile functional groups have become the first
choice, whose adsorption involves several mechanisms. In this perspective article, electrostatic interactions,
hydrogen bonding, π-π interactions, ion exchange, surface complexation and coordination/chelation were
introduced in detail to provide an overview for a better understanding of the action mechanisms of various
hydrogels. Combining two or more mechanisms is advantageous to gain great adsorption capacity, which could
be achieved via physical or chemical modification of hydrogels. This short review aims to provide theoretical
guidance to design and prepare hydrogels for applications in water treatment.
* Corresponding author. Nanotechnology and Biodelivery Laboratory, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269-4017,
United States.
E-mail address: [email protected] (Y. Luo).
1
Authors contributed equally to this work.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100552
Received 16 February 2023; Received in revised form 27 February 2023; Accepted 6 March 2023
Available online 7 March 2023
2666-1543/© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-
nc-nd/4.0/).
H. Zhu et al. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 12 (2023) 100552
Fig. 1. Number of publications per year relevant to dyes or metal ions ab
sorption (solid column, left y-axis) using hydrogels (spotted column, right y-
axis) in the Web of Science© database in the previous 15 years (as of February Fig. 3. Schematic illustration of the formation of cellulose/alginate monolithic
15, 2023). hydrogel and the adsorption mechanism for methylene blue [12]. (For inter
pretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred
to the Web version of this article.)
value of the amino group on the chitosan is around pH 6.5, and the
carboxylic pKa value is near pH 4.8. Based on this, Wang et al. [9]
fabricated a pH-responsive carboxymethyl cellulose/chitosan hydrogel
to remove anionic and cationic dyes. At pH 11, carboxylic groups
become deprotonated as -COO– and dominated in the composite
hydrogels, which could bind the positively charged methylene blue
(MB), and the adsorption capacity was up to 110 mg/g. Alternatively, at
pH 2, the amino groups on this composite hydrogel existed in their
protonated form (NH+ 4 ), and the adsorption capacity of negatively
charged acid orange II reached 100 mg/g (Fig. 2). Likewise, Tong et al.
[10] prepared sodium alginate/hectorite clay hydrogel beads for copper
ions removal, where the removal percentage was only increased by 3.4%
from pH 2 to 4. Nevertheless, it was then greatly increased by 15.1%
Fig. 2. Schematic diagram and working mechanism of hydrogel adsorption and with a pH from 4 to 5.5. At the optimum pH of 5.2, the removal per
desorption of methylene blue (up) and acid orange II (down) based on elec centage achieved 96.1%. The underlying mechanism mediated via pH is
trostatic interaction [9]. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this
that in lower pH, more H+ ions exist, which compete for the adsorption
figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
of Cu2+ onto the functional groups; at higher pH, ionization of -OH and
-COOH results in the formation of -O– and -COO–, creating abundant
2. Mechanisms of actions of hydrogels functional sites for the electrostatic interactions between anionic bind
ing sites and Cu2+ more easily.
Understanding the adsorption mechanism is very important to apply
different hydrogel adsorbents to remove dyes and metal ions. In the
following sections, electrostatic interactions, hydrogen bonding, π-π 2.2. Hydrogen bonding
interactions, ion exchange, surface complexation and coordination/
chelation were respectively introduced in detail. It is worth mentioning Hydrogen bonding is a special kind of intermolecular or intra
that several mechanisms exist in the adsorption process generally, molecular interaction. Specifically, when an H atom covalently bonded
depending on both the composition of hydrogels (carboxymethyl cel to a more electronegative “donor” atom or group (X) is close to an
lulose, chitosan, hectorite clay, graphene, etc.) and the set adsorptive electronegative atom bearing a lone pair of electrons—the hydrogen
condition (pH, temperature, concentration, etc.). bond acceptor (Y), the force is generated between X and Y with
hydrogen as a medium, named as hydrogen bonding (abbreviated to X-
H…Y). N, O and F are the most frequent donor and acceptor atoms. This
2.1. Electrostatic interactions bond is weaker than covalent or ionic bonds but stronger than van der
Waals forces. Hydrogen bonding is one of the major interactions to
The definition of electrostatic interaction is that two oppositely remove dyes in the water together with electrostatic interactions. Sethi
charged molecules/atoms are attracted to each other. Usually, the in et al. [11] prepared dialdehyde carboxymethyl cellulose-gelatin
tensity of surface charges and distance between the two interactive hydrogel to remove Rhodamine B (RhB) and Methyl Violet (MV). The
substances profoundly determine the interaction force, where the results showed that the maximum removal percentage of RhB and MV
greater intensity of surface charges and the closer distance, the stronger were 96.5% and 90% at pH 6, respectively, with a combined action of
the attraction [7], suggesting that the solution pH has an indispensable hydrogen bonding (O-H⋯N), van der Waals force and electrostatic in
effect when applying the adsorbents [8]. In detail, when the solution pH teractions between hydrogels and dyes. The author further explained
differs from the point of zero charges of hydrogels, the surface of that the stronger hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions
hydrogels is able to carry either negative or positive charges to remove established via more carboxylic acid groups in RhB over MV contributed
the dyes or metal ions carrying opposite charges. For example, the pKa to a higher removal percentage of RhB than that of MV. Similarly, Yuan
2
H. Zhu et al. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 12 (2023) 100552
Fig. 4. Mechanisms for adsorption of methylene blue and methyl orange onto hydrogels [14]. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the
reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
3
H. Zhu et al. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 12 (2023) 100552
Data availability
Acknowledgement
4
H. Zhu et al. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 12 (2023) 100552
[16] S. Kumar, S. Jain, History, introduction, and kinetics of ion exchange materials, [21] E. Abdel-Halim, Preparation of starch/poly (N, N-Diethylaminoethyl methacrylate)
J. Chem. 2013 (2013). hydrogel and its use in dye removal from aqueous solutions, React. Funct. Polym.
[17] L. Dong, L.a. Hou, Z. Wang, P. Gu, G. Chen, R. Jiang, A new function of spent 73 (2013) 1531–1536.
activated carbon in BAC process: removing heavy metals by ion exchange [22] H. Hou, R. Zhou, P. Wu, L. Wu, Removal of Congo red dye from aqueous solution
mechanism, J. Hazard Mater. 359 (2018) 76–84. with hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite, Chem. Eng. J. 211 (2012) 336–342.
[18] M.I. Inyang, B. Gao, Y. Yao, Y. Xue, A. Zimmerman, A. Mosa, P. Pullammanappallil, [23] X. Li, X. Wang, T. Han, C. Hao, S. Han, X. Fan, Synthesis of sodium lignosulfonate-
Y.S. Ok, X. Cao, A review of biochar as a low-cost adsorbent for aqueous heavy guar gum composite hydrogel for the removal of Cu2+ and Co2+, Int. J. Biol.
metal removal, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2016) 406–433. Macromol. 175 (2021) 459–472.
[19] S. Wu, J. Guo, Y. Wang, C. Huang, Y. Hu, Facile preparation of magnetic sodium [24] W. Wang, Y. Kang, A. Wang, One-step fabrication in aqueous solution of a granular
alginate/carboxymethyl cellulose composite hydrogel for removal of heavy metal alginate-based hydrogel for fast and efficient removal of heavy metal ions,
ions from aqueous solution, J. Mater. Sci. 56 (2021) 13096–13107. J. Polym. Res. 20 (2013) 1–10.
[20] B. Zhao, H. Jiang, Z. Lin, S. Xu, J. Xie, A. Zhang, Preparation of acrylamide/acrylic [25] C.B. Godiya, S.M. Sayed, Y. Xiao, X. Lu, Highly porous egg white/
acid cellulose hydrogels for the adsorption of heavy metal ions, Carbohydrate polyethyleneimine hydrogel for rapid removal of heavy metal ions and catalysis in
Polym. 224 (2019), 115022. wastewater, React. Funct. Polym. 149 (2020), 104509.