Econ1003 201718 01 Econ1003w1
Econ1003 201718 01 Econ1003w1
Econ1003 201718 01 Econ1003w1
Student number . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
PART A carries 60/100 points and you should aim to spend about 75 minutes
on it. This part consists of 20 equally weighted multiple choice questions. Write
your answers for this part on the multiple choice answer sheet; use a treasury
tag to join it to this sheet.
PART B carries 40/100 points and you should aim to spend about 45 minutes
on it. This part consists of 4 equally weighted questions. Explain your
answers in the space provided. Use the answer book for any extra material
if you find that the space provided for your answer is insufficient; use a treasury
tag to join it to this sheet.
(a) It is rivalrous.
(b) It is excludable.
(c) Private provision of this good leads to inefficiency.
(d) It is owned by the public.
(a) will not affect the price that producers receive because their supply
is so inelastic.
(b) will result in the consumer tax incidence of 0%.
(c) will result in the consumer tax incidence of 50%.
(d) may result in a non-zero consumer tax incidence, but its size will
depend on whether the tax is paid by consumers or producers.
A6 (3 points) The supply and demand equations for Nantucket Nectar’s Kiwi-
berry juice are given by Qs = −4 + 5P and Qd = 29 − 6P respectively,
where price is in pounds per liter and quantity is thousands of liters. The
equilibrium market price and quantity is:
TURN OVER
(a) earns a profit in the short run and the long run.
(b) earns a profit in the long run but not the short run.
(c) can earn profits or incur losses in the short run.
(d) can earn profits or incur losses in the long run.
A11 (3 points) EBay.com is a vast auction site that has some similarities to a
competitive market and some differences. In what way does eBay differ
from what economists define as a competitive market?
(a) Sellers in competitive markets are usually large firms, but on eBay
there are just a large number of sellers.
(b) Sellers on eBay sometimes mislead customers, while in a competitive
market deceit cannot happen.
(c) Sellers in competitive markets want to make a profit, but sellers on
eBay are small and hence are only selling for fun.
(d) It is easy to start selling on eBay, but to enter a competitive market
one must be organized as a corporation.
A17 (3 points) Suppose that a firm producing furniture will be delivering 200
tables annually for many years to come. The firm employs 100 units of
labor and 100 units of capital (and nothing else). Isoquants are smooth.
Wages and the price of capital are both equal to one. Suddenly, the gov-
ernment introduces new stringent safety regulations – it is estimated that
the price of labor will effectively rise by 10%. After long-run adjustments
of labor and capital, the total cost will go up by:
(a) 5% exactly.
(b) more than 5%.
(c) less than 5%.
(d) more, less or exactly 5%. There is not enough information to deter-
mine this.
(a) completeness
(b) rationality
(c) transitivity
(d) more is better
A19 (3 points) The UK can produce either 1000 units of cheese or 1200 units of
wine (or their proportional combinations). The EU can produce either 500
units of cheese or 700 units of wine (or their proportional combinations).
They both want to consume both cheese and wine. Which of the following
is true:
TURN OVER
(a) Suppose that this country is in autarky, that is, the imports and
exports are banned. What is the equilibrium price and quantity?
What is the Consumer Surplus? What is the Producer Surplus?
What is the total Social Welfare? Annotate Figure 1 and shade the
area that represents Social Welfare.
p
Demand Supply
(domestic) (domestic)
Q
Figure 1: Supply and Demand
(b) Suppose that imports are allowed, and suppose that the world price
of this product is 30. Use Figure 2 below to draw the new market
supply in this country. Calculate the new total Social Welfare and
the Deadweight Loss (DWL) associated with the total ban of foreign
trade. Show them in Figure 2.
p
Demand Supply
(domestic) (domestic)
Q
Figure 2: Supply and Demand
TURN OVER
B2 (10 points) Explain in a few bullet points how equality of opportunity may
achieve an outcome that is both Pareto efficient and envy-free. What is
the role of competition and transferable endowments?
B3 (10 points) Consider a monopolist whose cost curves are depicted in Fig-
ure 3. The market’s demand function and the Marginal Revenue curve
that can be derived from this demand are also depicted.
p
MC
AC
AV C
Demand
MR Q
Figure 3: Monopoly
(a) Indicate the optimal quantity and price of this monopoly. Shade in
the area that represents profit or loss and operational profit or loss.
(b) Just judging from the Figure, is this monopoly a natural monopoly?
Why?
TURN OVER
B4 (10 points) Suppose that there are two firms selling electricity in a certain
country. Electricity is a homogeneous good. The cost of production and
delivery is 5 pence per kWh. The demand is perfectly inelastic at 2,000
kWh per household (and there are 1,000,000 households in this country)
as long as the price does not exceed the choke price of 23 pence per kWh
(if the price exceeds that choke price, the quantity demanded drops to
zero). Firms choose prices simultaneously and the consumers buy from
the cheaper supplier; or, if prices are equal, the firms split the market
equally.
Colluding and charging the common price of 23 pence per kWh seems like
a good idea. Using appropriate jargon, provide a formal argument why
this behavior is difficult to sustain in an equilibrium.
END OF PAPER
Those students for whom this is a core module (Econ programmes) should think that the exam mark
of 40-60 is a warning sign. To be prepared for ECON1002 and the following years, the aim should
be to score more than 60.
Pattern of question choice:
n.a.
Question B1: Overall most students were able to identify the social welfare on the graph and in most
cases recognised that the social welfare was the sum of the producer surplus and consumer surplus
in part a. Some students could not identify this and in some cases correctly labelled producer
surplus and consumer surplus but shaded in a separate (incorrect) area for social welfare. Some
students did not do any calculations in these questions and therefore lost marks. For those that did
do calculations on the whole they were correct (if they had correctly identified the correct areas for
producer surplus and consumer surplus), however there were some expected errors in the
calculations. Overall students struggled with part b of the question. Only a small handful correctly
labelled the new supply curve, however more students identified the correct area of the deadweight
loss. On the whole most students lost many of their marks on this part and overall it was poorly
answered.
Question B2: Most students mentioned a combination of correct ideas, but the problem is that often
they also added all kinds of unrelated issues. This question does have a short, succinct answer:
The equal opportunity approach postulates: equal re-distribution of endowments & equal
access to markets; choices can be different, following heterogeneous preferences.
Equal re-distribution is envy-free; choices after trades is also envy-free;
Equal re-distribution may not be Pareto efficient; consumption after trades is Pareto efficient,
if markets are perfectly competitive, by First Welfare Thm.
Perfect competition and redistribution of endowments is necessary for this argument but
often questionable in practice.
Question B3: Students did well in 3.a. Some students could not find the operational profit. Only a
few failed to find the optimal Q and P. However, those who did could also find the profit level. The
majority of students could not answer 3.b. Many students did well by arguing about average and/or
fixed costs, barriers to entry, defining a natural monopoly (NM), examples of NMs, economies of
scale, and so on. Some did wrong arguments or did not mention any key points. Very few did not
answer the question.
Question B4: This is not an essay question! A “formal” argument was expected (an explanation why
the suggested plan is not a Nash equilibrium, mentioning of Bertrand competition was expected),
and very few students provided one. Also a lot of students answered questions that were not asked,
e.g. about the legality of cartels.