Bogalech Fufa
Bogalech Fufa
Bogalech Fufa
By:
Bogalech Fufa
Supervisor:
Dr. MulugetaBetre
June 2015
By:
BogalechFufa
Board of Examiners:
Acknowledgement
I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my advisor Dr.MulugetaBetrefor his
unreserved assistance, timely comments and relevant guidance from the beginning of the
research proposal to the write-up of the final paper.
i
I would also like to extend my thanks to my co- advisor Teshager Mersha for his invaluable
suggestions from the beginning of the research proposal throughout the thesis work.
In addition I would like to thank Marie Stopes International Ethiopia’s team members who have
participated in this study and the School of Public Health of the Addis Ababa University for the
support provided to me in accomplishing this thesis.
Table of Contents
Acknowledgement…………………………………………………………………………………………i
Table of Contents.........................................................................................................................................iii
List of Tables................................................................................................................................................v
List of Tables………………………………………………………………………………………………vi
ii
Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................ vii
Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................viii
1. Background ......................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2Problem Statement .............................................................................................................................. 2
1.3The Expected outcome........................................................................................................................ 3
2. Literature Review ................................................................................................................................ 3
2.1Overview of cervical cancer screening.....................................................................................................4
2.2Knowledge of cervical cancer screening ............................................................................................. 5
2.3 Attitude of cervical cancer screening .................................................................................................. 7
2.4Practices of cervical cancer screening ................................................................................................. 8
3. Objective ............................................................................................................................................. 9
4. Methodology ..................................................................................................................................... 10
4.1Study design ..................................................................................................................................... 10
4.2 Study area........................................................................................................................................ 11
4.3Data source and study population ...................................................................................................... 11
4.4Data Collection Instrument ............................................................................................................... 12
4.5Data Collection Process .................................................................................................................... 13
4.6Operational definition ....................................................................................................................... 13
4.7Data entry and analysis procedures ................................................................................................... 15
4.8Data quality management.................................................................................................................. 15
4.9 Ethical Consideration ....................................................................................................................... 16
4.10Dissemination of Results ................................................................................................................ 16
5. Results .............................................................................................................................................. 16
5.1 Background Characteristics of Health Service Providers .................................................................. 16
5.2 Knowledge towards Burden of Cervical Cancer ............................................................................... 19
5.3Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Risk Factors ............................................................................ 20
5.4Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Symptom....................................................................................21
5.5Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer screening procedure ................................................................. 22
5.6 Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Screening Recommended Age of Women ............................... 23
5.7 Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Screening Recommended Interval........................................... 24
5.8 Attitude of Health Service Providers towards Cervical Cancer Screening……………………………24
5.9 Practice of Health Service Providers towards Cervical Cancer Screening……………………………25
6.Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 26
iii
6.Strengthand Limitationof Study .......................................................................................................... 32
7.Conclusionand Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 32
7.1Conclusions ...................................................................................................................................... 33
7.2Recommendations ............................................................................................................................ 34
References...................................................................................................................................................35
Apendices ............................................................................................................................................. 38
Annexes 1- Survey questionnaire (English)............................................................................................ 38
Annexes 2. Guide for in- depth Interview with area managers ................................................................ 44
Annexes: 3 Amharic questionnaires ....................................................................................................... 45
Declaration ............................................................................................................................................ 49
List of tables
iv
Table3: Knowledge towards Burden of Cervical Cancer ........................................................................ 19
List of Figures
v
Figure2: Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Symptoms ................................................................21
Figure3: Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Screening Procedure ……………………...…...……......22
Figure4: Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Screening Recommended Age of Women………….…..23
vi
Abbreviations
CSRH Comprehensive Sexual Reproductive Health
ETB Ethiopian Birr
FGAE Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia
FGM Female Genital Mutilation
FMOH Federal Ministry of Ethiopia
HCPs Health Care Providers
HSPsHealth Service Providers
HPV Human papillomavirus
IDI In Depth Interview
KAP Knowledge, Attitude and Practices
LEEP Loop electrosurgical excision procedure
MSIE Marie Stopes International Ethiopia
Pap Papanicolaou
SPSS Statistical Package for Social Sciences
STI Sexually transmitted infections
VIA Visual inspection with acetic acid
VILI Visual inspection with Lugol’s iodine
WHOWorld Health Organization
vii
Abstract
Background and Objective:Cervical Cancer is one of the major non-communicable health
problems, largely preventablewith effective screening programmesandhuman papilloma virus
(HPV) vaccination to prevent, detect and reduce cervical cancer.The burden of cervical cancer is
disproportionately high among the developing countries. The study was conducted to assess
Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) on Cervical Cancer Screening amongHealth Service
Providers (HSP) at Marie Stopes International Ethiopia Centers in 2015.
Materials and Methods:An exploratorydescriptive cross-sectional study design,both
quantitative and qualitative method was employed. Quantitativedata was collected by means of
self-administered questionnaire from 190 health service providers and qualitative bymeans of an
in-depth interviewfrom five area managers, bothemployed at Marie Stopes International
Ethiopia.
Result:The mean age of the study participants were 34.7 years. 50% of participants considered
cancer of the cervix a public health problem in Ethiopia. They most frequently mentioned
multiple sexual partners 52.6%, sexually transmitted infections (STI) 49.7%, smoking 28.1% and
sexual intercourse at early age 17.5% as major risk factors; and irregular vaginal bleeding 63.8%,
foul smelling vaginal discharge 52.8%, post coital bleeding 39.9% and dyspanurea 38% as major
symptoms of cervical cancer.Pap smear was the most popular screening test mentioned by 62.1%
andvisual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) or Lugol’s iodine (VILI) by 31.1% of respondents.
Participants mentioned recommended women age and screening interval inconsistently. About
66.3% of respondents believed all women should undergo screening for cervical cancer.
However, 53.2% of female respondents didn't feel susceptible to cervical cancer, as well as
65.1% had never been screened. Of the male respondents, only 19.8% had partners/ wives who
had ever been screened.
Conclusions and Recommendations: There is high KAP gap and misconception, towards
cervical cancer screening among HSP. Health service providers need to be targeted first for
cervical cancer screeningbecause of their essential role in the implementation of any future
screening programs and in their educative role with patients. Health service providers need to be
trained to provide health education services and are expectedto be a role model to motivate and
change others attitude and practices.
viii
ix
1. Background
1.1Introduction
Globally Cervical Cancer is one of the major non-communicable public health problems among
female population.Cervical cancer is largely preventable following the introduction of effective
cervical cancer screening programmesin conjunction with human papilloma virus (HPV)
vaccination to prevent, detect and reduce cervical cancer.The burden of cervical cancer is
disproportionately high among the developing countries where 85 % of the estimated 493, 000
new cases and 273, 000 deaths occur in resource-poor countries among women annually.In 2010,
it was estimated that 20.9 million women were at risk of developing cervical cancer in Ethiopia
with an estimated 4,648 and 3,235 annual numbers of new cases and deaths, respectively (1,2).
Low coverage of cervical cancer screening is a serious problem and a major barrier in reducing
the mortality and morbidity in the developing countries. Specifically in Sub-Saharan Africa very
few women are ever screened for cervical cancer. In Ethiopia data compiled by TikurAnbessa
Specialized Hospital from 1996 – 2008 showed 30.3% of all cancers diagnosed in the Hospital
were cervical cancer. The estimated coverage of cytology – based cervical cancer screening in
Ethiopia isvery poor 1.6% in urban settings and 0.4% in rural areas(3).
Mortality caused by cervical cancer in Africa is very high. The reported mortality in Eastern
Africa was 35 deaths per 100,000 women. However, the mortality rates in the developed world
where screening programs run successfully remained below 5 per 100,000 women during the
same year. Survival rate for five years in African countries such as Uganda was only 18%
whereas during the same year it was 72% in the United States of America. On an average in Sub
Saharan Africa the survival rate was 21% comparedto 70% in the United States and 66% in
Europe (4).
1
implementation: women with abnormal findings may not receive their results, let alone treatment
or follow-up. These are some of the barriers that prevent cytology-based screening programs
from being effective in LMICs (5).
In a bid to implement cervical cancer prevention and control program in Ethiopia, the Federal
Ministry of Health has developed cervical cancer prevention and control guideline.The main goal
of this guideline is to provide healthcare providers, implementing partners and other stakeholders
involved in the prevention and control of cervical cancer in Ethiopia with a standardized Cervical
Cancer Prevention and control health service delivery directive (5). As one of the major actors
on maternal health programs in the country, Marie Stopes International Ethiopia (MSIE) is
providing cervical cancer screening and preventive treatment through its Blue Star health care
network and MSIE centers as well as partnering with large scale farming sites under MSIE led fit
for work project. Currently MSIE is providing screening service using Pap smear technology and
has planned to initiate screening and treatment service using VIA and Cryotherapy (6).
Understanding the level of knowledge, attitudes and practices with regard to cervical cancer
screening among clients, health service providers and different stakeholders will help to address
practical and strategic need of cervical cancer prevention program in Ethiopia. Studies in this
respect seem to be limited in this country which resulted in information gap among practitioners,
researchers and policy makers. Among the exiting literatures few studies were dedicated to
assess the issue in concern taking only clients as study subjects (3, 8).Still very few
existingliteratures in the area of cervical cancer screening were conducted among service
2
providers and clients at a time (1, 9).Therefore as MSIE is one of the actors in providing
comprehensive sexual reproductive health (CSRH) services widely across 5 regions this KAP
studywas conducted among the health service providers to address the information gap.
2. Literature Reviewt
This chapter presents related literature on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) about
cervical cancer prevention and control. The section also briefly summarizes key studies
3
oncervical cancer prevention and control that have been undertaken in different parts of the
world.rpart of the uterus.
Cervical cancer is highlighted in the “Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the
General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases” as well as in
the “comprehensive global monitoring framework” under development which includes key
indicators, and a set of global targets for the prevention and control of non-communicable
diseases. (6) Implementation of cervical cancer prevention and control programs contributes to
the attainment of the MDGs through universal access to sexual and reproductive health services
to improve women’s health, to the 2010 UN Secretary-General’s Global Strategy for Women and
Children’s Health and to the 2011 Political Declaration of the UN General Assembly High level
Meeting on Non-communicable Diseases(6).
According to the 2002 World Health Organization report cervical cancer contributes around 12%
of all types of cancers among the women(7).Age-adjusted incidence rate of cervical cancer in
Ethiopia is 35.9 per 100,000 women with 7619 annual number of new cases and 6081 deaths
every year. In Ethiopia Data compiled by TikurAnbessa Specialized Hospital from 1996 – 2008
showed 30.3% of all cancers diagnosed in the Hospital was cervical cancer (3).Though availing
integrated cervical cancer screening services for women at risk will decrease deaths caused by
cervical cancer (10, 11).
4
Single-visit approach (SVA) using VIA shows promising results in terms of clinical benefits and
cost-effectiveness’s in reducing morbidity and mortality even in resource-poor settings (1).
Given the difficulty of sustaining a high-quality cervical cytology-based screening program, and
the proven effectiveness of the VIA approach, Ethiopia has looked to VIA combined with
cryotherapy for cervical cancer prevention (5).
Screening programs that involve one to two visits to health centers linked with the treatment
appear to be effective, safe and feasible (12).The screening tests for cervical cancer are based on
three assumptions: 1) Primary prevention 2) secondary Prevention and 3) tertiary care. Primary
Prevention includes prevention of infection with Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) either through
behavior change mechanisms, such as abstinence or condom use, or through biological
mechanisms, such as the HPV vaccine. Secondary prevention, which is the main focus of the
guideline, includes screening and treating precancerous lesions with effective outpatient
methods. Tertiary care includes management of invasive cervical cancer (i.e. surgery, radiation
therapy and chemotherapy), as well as palliative care. The first is that prevention is better than
cure and the second is that early detection may allow early treatment as the primary pathologic
process is still reversible. Screening tests are relatively simple procedures that separate healthy
persons from those with a high probability of having the disease (13).
Well-organized programs to detect and treat precancerous abnormalities at the early stages of
cancer prevent up to 80% of cervical cancers deaths in developed countries. However, effective
screening programs have been difficult to implement in low resource settings. This is one reason
why cervical cancer mortality rates are much higher in the developing world(14).So reduction of
the cervical cancer mortality in the developing world is only one of the many priorities
competing for scarce resources (15).
Studies conducted among health service providers KAP towards cervical cancer screening are
minimal especially in resource poor countries like Ethiopia. However study conducted among
Cameroonian healthcare workers revealed that Knowledge of cervical cancer and prevention by
screening showed several gaps and important misconceptions regarding screening methods (17).
Another study conducted in Tanzania regional Hospital identified less than half of the Nurses
had adequate knowledge regarding cervical cancer, causes and transmission of HPV and age of
5
to be screened; however there is a variation among professionals. Assuming all health
professionals have equal level of awareness with regard to cervical cancer screening is very
misleading. Though this study concluded that need for continuing medical education, creation of
cervical cancer prevention policies and strategies at all levels of the health sector (18).
Similarly a study conducted at Chennai Corporation in India revealed that 85% of female health
care providers (HCPs) were aware of major risk factors and symptoms of Cervical Cancer.95.3%
of HCPs were aware of Pap smear and VIA/ VILI, however only 62.1% and 78.4% knew the
exact purpose of Pap smear and VIA/ VILI respectively (19).
Another study conducted in Niger Delta University shows awareness in cervical cancer
screening was higher amongst female students than female staff in a tertiary institution, but
uptake was generallylow 13% staffs and 11.6% students. There was an association between
awareness and practice of cervical cancer screening amongst respondents. Overall, a greater
proportion of the staff respondents had little or no knowledge aboutcervical cancer screening
(20).
Similar study conducted in Haitian health care workers With regards to their knowledge about
cervical cancer and prevention, 69.2% stated they did not feel they had adequate knowledge.
100% of participants correctly stated that cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of death in
women worldwide. Also, 52.2% correctly stated that cervical cancer is preventable. When asked
whether cervical cancer was curable, 45.5% of the study sample correctly answered that
question. When asked if it is possible to detect pre-cancerous cervical cancer cells, 81.5%
correctly stated that was true. 74.1% of participants also recognized that cervical cancer is not
most common among women in their 20 s. When asked whether cervical cancer can usually be
found at an early stage because of the obvious symptoms such as bleeding and pain, 18.5%
correctly stated that was false. Two-thirds correctly recognized that if cervical cancer is left
untreated it is fatal. When participants were asked whether cervical cancer is caused by a virus
that is spread sexually, 77.8% correctly stated that was true. When asked whether there is a
vaccine that can prevent cervical cancer, one-third stated that was true. Almost all of participants
correctly recognized the purpose for screening is to detect pre-cancerous changes. When asked
whether screening for cervical cancer should begin when a woman is in her twenties, 51.9%
stated this was false.The risk factors for cervical cancer most often chosen by participants were:
6
HIV infection (38.5%), smoking (53.9%), multiple partners (57.7%), and HPV infection (73.1%)
(21).
In some cases clients are in a better position to exercise their health seeking behavior, for
instance most recently conducted study at the selected MSIE Centers and Blue Star Clinics
identified that knowledge on the risk factors, symptoms and prevention methods of cervical
cancer was found to be very limited among clients. However, majority of these clients are aware
of cervical cancer can be treated if diagnosed early. Moreover there was a high level of
willingness among women to get screened for cervical cancer and to pay for screening test and
treatment services (6).
7
As publicized in different studies, another study conducted in Botswana witnessed that negative
attitude of health service providers and limited access to the doctors were among the major
barriers to cervical cancer screening services (24).
8
3.Objective
3.1 General Objective
Assess Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Cervical Cancer Screening among Health Service
Providers at Marie Stopes International Ethiopia Center, 2015.
9
Understanding of health service providers towards cervical cancer risk factors,
symptom, screening procedure, recommended women age and screeninginterval
Opinionof health service providers towards cervical cancer screening
Actions and behavior of health service providers towards cervical cancer screening
4. Methodology
a.Quantitative method
4.1 Study design
An exploratory, descriptive cross-sectional study design, with both quantitative and qualitative
method was employed. Quantitative data was collected by means of self-administered
questionnaire from 190 health service providers and qualitative by an in-depth interview from
five area managers, employed at Marie Stopes International Ethiopia.
10
4.2 Study area
The study was conducted in MSIE centers, across four regions and two city administrations
(Tigray, Amhara, Oromia, SNNPR, Addis Ababa and Dire Dawa)Central area from February
10th to April 30th, 2015.MSIE is a fundamental provider of Comprehensive Sexual Reproductive
Health services in Ethiopia since its inception in 1990. The organization now operates in 23
static Centers, one National Call Center, 10 mobile units, more than 600 Blue Star Clinics and
although community health workers deployed to reach inaccessible and remote rural areas
through voucher program and link them with service delivery outlets. All MSIE centers provide
CSRH services including: short acting, long acting and permanent FP methods, VCT service,
ANC, STI screening and treatment, safe abortion, delivery, postnatal care, PMTCT,
immunization, different laboratory services and likes. The centers are selected as a study sites
because of their potential and eligible client flow and, high number of health service providers.
Tigray Mekele 1 4
Amhara D/Birhan,Dessie,B/Dar and
D/Markos 4 32
11
Oromia Bishotu,Adama,Ambo,
Nekemte,Jimma, and Asella 6 44
SNNRP Hawsa,Hossana,Arbaminch,
Wolayta and Shashemene 5 23
12
practices towards cervical cancer screening. The questionnaire was translated into Amharic using
professional linguists and pre-tested to ensure that it maintained its original meaning.
The questionnaire was divided into 4 major areas that included:-
Background characteristics
Knowledge towards cervical cancer which assesses:
burden of the disease
risk factors
symptoms
screening procedure
recommended age of women
recommended screening interval
Attitude towards cervical cancer screening
Practicestowards cervical cancer screening
4.5 Data Collection Process
After receiving clearance from Public Health Review and Ethical Clearancecommittee (REC),the
study was conducted using a paperquestionnaire. The researcher trained and oriented3 data
collectors about the purpose of the study, survey questionnaire and how to handle respondents
while in the field. The research tools were pre-tested at family guidance association of Ethiopia
(FGAE).Data collection occurred from February10thto April 30th, 2015 using 190 questionnaires.
The researcher designed data entry screens using SPSSversion 20software application that were
used to translate the paper questionnaire into electronic data for analysis.The researcher checked
the questionnaire simultaneously for completeness and reviewed accuracy of each questionnaire
at least once and corrected any resulting data errors before analysis.
13
We considered knowledge about symptoms of cervical cancer good if a respondent mentioned at
least 3 of the known symptoms (irregular bleeding, foul smelling vaginal discharge and post
coital bleeding).
We considered knowledge about screening technique of cervical cancer good if a respondent
mentioned at least 2 of the known technique ( pap smear and VIA/VILI).
We considered knowledge about recommended ageof screening for cervical cancer good if a
respondent mentioned at least> 30 years.
We considered knowledge about recommended interval of screening for cervical cancer good if a
respondent mentioned at least every 5years.
Attitude: Attitude was evaluated as perceived susceptibility to cervical cancer and willing to
undergo for screening themselves.
Practice:Practice was evaluated as screening patients for cervical cancerand in case of female
respondents, having ever been screened them and in case of male respondents wives/partners
have ever been screened.
Variables
Background characteristics: (sex, age, marital status, age at marriage, profession,
in-service year and training)
Knowledge
Attitude and
14
Practices
4.7 Data entry and analysis procedures
The collected quantitative data was entered and analyzed using SPSSversion 20 software
program for total score to calculate frequency, mean and percentage. Similarly, results from
qualitative data summarized by open code application under different themes identified. Data
analyzedusing the technique of triangulation in terms of comparing evidences coming from
different data sources.
4.8 Data quality management
To assure the quality of quantitative data, standardized data collection instrument was developed
and pretested at Family Guidance Association of Ethiopia (FGAE) to ensure for simplicity and
appropriateness.The entered data was checked for completeness at the beginning and middle
stage of the work. Data cleaning was conducted at the end of the data entry.
b. Qualitative Method
4.1 Study design
Case ethnographic study design was usedamong area mangers employed at MSIE across 5 areas
to complement and triangulate the quantitative findings, and data was collected through an in-
depth interview.
4.2 Study population
The study participants were area managers of MSIE who are in charge of leading health related
program across each region.
4.3 Data source and study population
The study was designedto involve all five area managers employed at Marie Stopes International
Ethiopia across five regions.
In-depth interview was conductedamong 5 area managers’ on May 15 and 16, 2015. In-depth
interview was conducted with each participant for 15 to 20 minutes and the developed interview
guide was used. Interview questionsinclude provision of cervical cancer screening at service
delivery points, capacity of providers,and challenges during intervention. The principal
15
investigator was the one to conduct an in-depth interview.Upon the consent of the participant in
an in-depth interview, the researcher made recordings through audio-tapes for ease of
transcribing the qualitative information to be obtained.
4.5 Data analysis
The recorded data with the audio tape were transcribed in Amharic and translated to English.
Analysis was undertaken manually using predetermined themes.
4.9 Ethical Consideration
Prior to data collection, Ethical clearance and approval of study wasobtained from review and
ethical clearance (REC) committee of Addis Ababa University, School of Public Health. Further,
MSIE and respective area managers were informed about purpose and deliverables of research
undertaking. The participants were informed their participation in this study will help for the
success of the study and better improvement of the program. Informed consent was obtained
from each study subjects and participants. Respondents were assured about confidentiality of
responses that would be maintained during and after data collection.
4.10Dissemination of Results
The findings from this study will be disseminated to Addis Ababa University School of Public
Health, MSIEand other organizations who are interested in this issue. Publication and
presentation of the findings at local and international forums will be considered.
5. RESULTS
Atotal of 190 Health Service Providers were study participants. The mean age of participants is
34.7 years ± 8.9 SD,ranging from 21 to 58 years.TheywereObstetrician/Gynecologist(6), General
16
practitioners(8), Laboratory technicians (17), Midwifes (25)and Nurses(79).Among the study
participants 57.4% and 63.7% were female and marriedrespectively;their mean age at marriage is
26.8 years ± 4.5 SD ranging from 18 to 42 years. About 39.5% participants have been serving as
a health service provider ranging from1 to 38 years with a mean of 11.3 years ± 7.1 SD.Among
all participants only 7.9% (95% CI: 4.2-12.1%)of providers attended training regarding cervical
cancer.(Table 2)
17
Variable Number(N=190) Percentage
Male 81 42.6
Age ( in year)
21 – 30 80 42.1
31 - 40 70 36.8
41 - 50 26 13.7
≥ 51 14 7.4
Mean 34.7 years ± 8.9SD
Marital status
Single 61 32.1
Married 121 63.7
Widowed 8 4.2
Age at marriage( in year) (N=139)
15-19 1 0.7
20-24 46 33.1
25-29 58 41.7
>=30 34 24.5
Mean 26.8years ± 4.5SD
Profession
Obstetrician/ Gynecologist 6 3.2
General Practitioner 8 4.2
Laboratory Technician 17 8.9
Midwife 25 13.2
Health Officer 55 28.9
Nurse 79 41.6
In service year
≤4 16 8.4
5-9 75 39.5
10 - 14 45 23.7
≥15 54 28.4
Mean 11.3 years ± 7.1SD
Attended training about
cervical cancer
Yes 15 7.9
No 175 92.1
18
5.2 Knowledge towards Burden of Cervical Cancer
About 77.4% and 50% of respondents considered cervical cancer is at high extent and a public
health problem in Ethiopia respectively. (Table3)
19
5.3 Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Risk Factors
The most frequently mentioned risk factor for cervical cancer is multiple sexual partner 52.6%,
Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) 49.7%, smoking 28.1%, early sexual intercourse
17.5%,HIV infection 10%, HPV 14.6% and others 39.6% of cervical cancer. (Fig 1)
Findings of the in depth interviews (IDIs) indicated most of health services providers don’t have
adequate knowledge about cervical cancer. All respondents believed and agreed lack of trained
human resources is one of the hindering factors in cervical cancer screening services.
As most of participants mentioned multiple sexual partners and Sexually Transmitted Infection
(STI)are mainrisk factors to develop cervical cancer.
One of the area managers said that:
“…..amazingto hear this because we assume ourselves as best sexual reproductive health
provider in the country but on the contrary with this huge number of health service providers
and different professions….”
60.00%
52.6%
49.7%
50.00%
40.00%
39.6%
30.00% 28.1%
0.00%
20
5.4Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Symptoms
The most frequently mentioned vaginal bleeding 63.8%, foul smelling vaginal discharge 52.8%,
post coital bleeding 39.9%, Dyspanurea 38%, abdominal pain 16%, pelvic pain 16.6% and others
12.7% of cervical cancer. (Fig 2)
Findingsof the in depth interviews (IDIs) indicated that most of health services providers don’t
have adequate knowledge about cervical cancer. All respondents believed and agreed lack of
trained human resources is one of the hindering factors in cervical cancer screening services.As
Vaginal bleeding, foul smelling, vaginal discharge are the most frequently mentioned symptoms
of cervical cancer mentioned by study participants.
70.00%
63.8%
60.00%
52.8%
50.00%
39.9%
40.00% 38%
30.00%
0.00%
21
5.5 Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer screening procedure
Almost 86.8% of respondents believed that screening can detect cervical cancerbefore symptoms
appear.62.1%, 31.1 % and 4.7% of participants mentioned Pap smear, VIA/VILI and colposcopy
4.7% as cervical cancer screening procedures respectively. However few numbers of respondents
wrongly mentioned punch biopsy 6.8% and Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)
2.6% as a cervical cancer screening techniques.
Findings of the in depth interview perceived that Pap smear and VIA/VILI mentioned by most of
health services providers as screening procedureto detect cervical cancer was the most
commonly used cervical cancer screening technique in MSIE centers.( Fig 3)
2.6%
4.7%
6.8%
Pap smear
VIA/VILI
Punch biopsy
31.1% LEEP
62.1%
Colposcopy
22
5.6Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Screening Recommended Age of Women
Around 30% of study participants attempted to identifyrecommended age of women for cervical
cancer screening. Those were > 30 years 6.8%,15 to 49years 8.4%,25 to 45years 8.4%,all women
>18years 6.8%. Remarkably70% of respondents didn’t know recommended age of women to be
screened (Fig 4). Findings of the in depth interview observed that HSP did not fully addressed
recommended age of women to be screened.
6.8%
8.4%
23
5.7 Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer Screening Recommended Interval
The most frequently mentioned time interval for early detection and intervention was every one
year 28.4%, every six month 14.2%, every five year 12.1%, every six month to one year 7.4%,
every two year 5.8%, every three year 2.1%, every three to five year 1.6%, every three month
1.6%, one to two months after first screening 1.1% .Remarkably 25.7% of participants didn’t
know cervical cancer screening interval (Fig 5). Findings of the in depth interview revealed that
HSP did not fully addressed recommended screening interval for cervical cancer.
5.8 Attitude of Health Service Providers towards Cervical Cancer Screening
53.2% of female participants didn’t think they were susceptibleto cervical cancer and were not
willing to undergo screening, however 66.3% of respondents believeall women should undergo
screening for cervical cancer. About 7.8% of participants will recommend screening for women
who developed symptoms, 52.2% of respondents recommend screening for women who weren’t
sexually active and 61.7% of respondents believed all clients who visited MSIE centers are
eligible for cervical cancer screening.Approximately71.7% and 82.2% believed that manual
pelvic and speculum exam is important for cervical cancer screening respectively. However
46.8%of female participants were susceptibleto cervical cancer and will undergo for screening
themselves.
All IDI’s respondents explained that all women should undergo screening for cervical cancer at
its early stage for early detection and prevention. Eventually, all respondents mentioned that
cervical cancer can be treated hundred percent if the detection is done at its early stage. However
lack of national cervical cancer prevention and control guideline and focus of msie and donors
were towards core businesses like safe abortion, family planning and safe motherhood which
might affect focus towards cervical cancer.
Some professionals may not be aware of that women are at risk of getting cervical cancer and
they should undergo for regular screening.One of the area managers said that:
“…..I think providers not provide necessary information to clients about cervical cancer
screening availability in our center or other health facility might be due to lack of training,
knowledge and confidence ….”
24
5.9Practice of Health Service Providers towards Cervical Cancer Screening
Among all female respondents only34.9% and 19.8% wives/partners of male respondents have
ever screenedfor cervical cancer. Only 28.9%, 37.4% and 28.4% of respondents ever done pelvic
and speculum examination and cervical cancer screening respectively.
Participants mentioned ,not having symptom, not feeling at risk, not giving attention, not
sexually active, not having awareness about cervical cancer, not eligible, lack of access, fear of
procedure, self-protection from risk factors, not comfortable with speculum and pelvic area
procedure, had Hysterectomy as a reason of not screened for cervical cancer.
All IDIs respondents witnessed that cervical cancer screening uptake is very low, it may not be
nil. The common factors that all IDIs explained for low practices for cervical cancer are giving
no attention,lack of access to the services and lack of trained human resources.
One of the area managers said that:
“….. may be due to high work/ client load at MCH and some busy center, providers not give
attention about cervical cancer seriousness and screening services to themselves and eligible
clients….”
25
6. DISCUSSION
In general, our study identifiedhigh Knowledge, Attitude and Practices gap and misconception,
towards cervical cancer screening among Health Service Providers of Marie Stopes International
Ethiopia, Centers.
Unavailability of systematic screening program the expected practice is to opportunistically
screen eligible women when they come to centers for other sexual reproductive health services or
referred from health facilities. In the opportunistic screening system, the onus is on the health
worker who handles the eligible women to offer screening or refer her to a facility where
screening could be done. The majority of respondents in our study were nurses, who form the
bulk of medical workers in most health facilities.
Though Ethiopia as country has already recognized cervical cancer as one of major public health
problem and shows some promising start up to address the problem like development of
guideline for cervical cancer prevention and control January 2015.
The study has tried to assess participant’s knowledge pertaining to risk factors for cervical
cancer. 52.6% of respondents mentioned multiple sexual partners as one of the risk factor for
cervical cancer. Similarly around 49.7% of the respondents had mentioned Sexually Transmitted
Infection (STI) as one of the risk factor for cervical cancer, another 28.1%, 10% and 14.6% were
mentioned smoking, HIV infection and HPV as risk factor for cervical cancer respectively.
Only small number of participants was aware that HPV infection can lead to cervical cancer.
These results show inadequate knowledge of HPV infection being the cause of cervical cancer in
health professionals in our center. The finding is not consistent with study conducted on
knowledge and awareness about cc and its prevention amongst interns and nursing staff in
tertiary care hospitals in karachi, Pakistanshowed 98% of cervical cancer in our part of the world
is due to HPV infection (30).
The study finding is not consistent with study conductedamong nursing staff in Surat Gujarat
Indiateaching hospital, onknowledge, attitudes and practices about cervical cancer and
screeningat which majority of the respondents have mentioned multiple sexual partners (61.5%)
as one of risk factor for cervical cancer. Similarly according to this study, more than a third of
the respondents mentioned that Human Papilloma Virus infection (38.6%) as one of risk factor
for cervical cancer followed by and heredity (31%) (9).
26
On the other hand study conducted in Haitian health care workers, revealed, that majority of the
respondent have mentioned HPV infection (73.1%) as one of the risk factor for cervical
screening followed multiple partners (57.7%) and smoking (53.9%) respectively (21).
Similar study conducted oncervical cancer knowledge and screening behaviors among female
university graduates of year 2012 attending national graduate orientation program, Bhutan found
that 53% of the respondents agreed that multiple sexual partners increased the risk of getting
cervical cancer and in contrary 53% of the respondents knew sex at an early age as risk factor for
cervical cancer. About 26% of the respondents were aware of the history of cervical cancer
among close family relatives as a risk factor(28).
Another study conducted on Cervical Cancer Screening amongst Nurses in Lagos University
Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria and found similar result that 54% of the respondents
associated cervical cancer with having multiple sexual partners, however in the contrary 47.5%
linked cervical cancer with having sex at early age, while 52% of the respondents understood
human papillomavirus to be a causative agent in cervical cancer. Again, 18.5% and 19.5% of the
respondents felt that excess alcohol and smoking could cause cervical cancer, respectively.
Almost 85.5% and 95% respondents were aware of the preventability and detectability of
cervical cancer respectively (29).In the contrary study conducted on Knowledge and Awareness
about Cervical Cancer and its Prevention amongst Interns and Nursing Staff in Tertiary Care
Hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan found 61% of the respondents knew that Human Papilloma Virus
(HPV) as the risk factor for cervical cancer (30).
Similarly the study has also tried to assess the study participants’ knowledge towards the sign
and symptom of cervical cancer. Accordingly the most frequently mentioned sign and symptom
was vaginal bleeding 63.8%, foul smelling vaginal discharge 52.8%, post coital bleeding 39.9%,
Dyspanurea 38%. This result is similar with the qualitative findings of the IDIs. The knowledge
level of the study participant on this specific parameter is totally different from a study
conducted on, Knowledge, attitude & practices about cervical cancer and screening among
nursing staff in a teaching hospital, Surat, Gujarat, India, at which majority of the respondents
mentioned foul smelling discharge (73.5%) as one of sign for cervical cancer, followed by post
coital bleeding (45%) and post-menopausal bleeding (44.5%) as signs and symptom of cervical
cancer (9).
27
In the contrary study conducted on knowledge and awareness about cervical cancer and its
Prevention amongst interns and nursing staff in tertiary care hospitals in karachi, pakistanfound
the most common presenting complain reported was lower abdominal pain 42% and per vaginal
bleeding 40%, while few thought discharge 20%, fever 15% and menstrual irregularity could
also be the initial symptoms patients with cervical cancer can present with(30).
Only 7.9% of health service providers had ever attended training towards cervical cancer
screening,similar with the qualitative findings of the IDIs.For countries suffering with high
burden of the disease like Ethiopia, the figure seems very low and showed how the centers are
less equipped to deal with the problem. For instance according to cross-section study conducted
on knowledge, attitude and practice on cervical cancer and screening among female health
workers in India by Chennai corporation, of the total 107 interviewed health workers, about
40% of the participants have ever attained the training (19 ).
50% of study participants believed that cervical cancer a major public health problem in
Ethiopia. But descriptive study on knowledge, attitude and practice on cervical screening among
medical workers of Mulago, Uganda revealed 93% of the respondents know that cancer of the
cervix was a public health concern (21). Similarly the awareness level of the disease burden for
this study participant was found to be low compared to a study conducted on awareness of HPV
transmission and cervical cancer prevention among Cameroonian healthcare worker which is
86%(17).Another study conducted in Haitian health care workers found their level of knowledge
about cervical cancer and prevention is 69.2%, but stated they didn’t feel they had adequate
knowledge.100% of participants correctly stated that cervical cancer is one of the leading causes
of death in women worldwide (21).
Although, the study hastried to assess participant’s knowledge about cervical cancer screening.
Accordingly around 86.8% of participants believed that screening can detect cervical cancer
even before the symptoms appear. And this finding is almost similar with cross-section study
conducted on knowledge, attitude and practice on cervical cancer and screening among female
health workers in India by Chennai Corporation where 81.7% of the respondents believed that
screening can detect cervical cancer even before the symptoms appear (19). Similarly, a study
conducted in Haitian health care workers, revealed that, when asked if it is possible to detect pre-
cancerous cervical cancer cells, 81.5% correctly stated that was true (21).
28
Similar study conducted on Cervical Cancer Screening Amongst Nurses in Lagos University
Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeriaalso found 85.5% were aware of the preventability and
detectability 95% of cervical cancer (29).
Regarding to study participant’s knowledge on different screening methods, 62.1%, 31.1% and
4.7% of them mentioned Pap smear, VIA/ VILI and colposcopy respectively. However few
numbers of respondents wrongly mentioned punch biopsy 6.8% and Loop electrosurgical
excision procedure (LEEP) 2.6% as a cervical cancer screening techniques. The level of
knowledgeof respondents seems low compared to study conducted on cross-sectional study
conducted on knowledge, attitude and practice on cervical cancer and screening among female
health workers in Indi by Chennai Corporation which is 95.3 %(19).
The level of knowledge among female university graduates of year 2012 seems higher compared
toscreening behaviors attending national graduate orientation program, Bhutanwhich is 53%
(28).
In the contrary study conducted on knowledge and awareness about cervical cancer and its
prevention amongst interns and nursing staff in tertiary care hospitals in karachi, pakistan75% of
both interns and nurses mentioned Pap smear as a screening test for cervical cancer. However,
Biopsy 8%, ultrasound 3%, HVS (2%) and Radiological scans 10% were few of the incorrect
responses observed(30).
The most mentioned recommended age of women for cervical cancer screening was 15 to 49
and 25 to 45 years old which actually comprises same figure which was 8.4 %.On the other hand,
6.8 % of the respondents mentioned > 30 years and another 6.8 % of the respondents mentioned
that all women >18years are eligible for screening. Remarkably 69.6% didn’t know age group of
women to be screened, which is complemented by result from IDIs;
one of the area managers said that:
“….. amazing to hear this because we assume ourselves as best sexual reproductive health
provider in the country but on the contrary with this huge number of health service providers
and different professions….”
Unlike this study finding,more than 63.2% of the respondents suggested that screening should
start for women > 30 years of age according to cross-section study conducted on knowledge,
attitude and practice on cervical cancer and screening among female health workers in Indi by
Chennai Corporation (19).
29
Another study conducted on acceptability and correlates of primary and secondary prevention of
cervical cancer among medical students in southwest china implications for cancer
education 32% stated that women should start to undergo screening from the age of 25 (31).
Time interval for cervical screening was also assessed, according to the study finding majority of
the participants most frequently mentioned interval for early detection and treatment was every
one year 28.4% and every five year 12.1% respectively. Howeverevery six month 14.2%, every
six month to one year 7.4%, every two year 5.8%, every three year 2.1%, every three to five year
1.6%, every three month 1.6% and one to two months after first screening 1.1% were mentioned
by the participants. Remarkably 25.7% of participants didn’t know cervical cancer screening
interval.They believed that Pap smear should be done once in one, two, three years or lifetime by
67.5%, 8.5%, 14% and 7.5% respectively. Sixty three percent nurses felt the need of doing Pap
in women above 18 years (9).
Another study conducted on acceptability and correlates of primary and secondary prevention of
cervical cancer among medical students in southwest china implications for cancer
education 49.2% felt women should receive screening every year(31).
Generally 66.3% of participants believed that all women should undergo cervical cancer
screening. Again 58.4% participants believed all clients who visited MSIE are eligible for
screening. Although 7.4% and 49.5% believed that cervical cancer screening is recommended for
a women after she developed a symptom and for sexually inactive women respectively. Similarly
67.9% and 77.9% believed pelvic exam and speculum exam is important for cervical cancer
screening respectively.
As a result of high misconception about cervical cancer and screening, only 46.8% consider
themselves at risk of cervical cancer, similarly 46.8% of respondents consider they will undergo
screening for cervical cancer, however65.1% of female participants have never undergone
cervical cancer screening, which is complemented by result from IDIs;
“…..I think providers not provide necessary information to clients about cervical cancer
screening availability in our center or other health facility might be due to lack of training,
knowledge and confidence ….”
30
Again another area manager said that:
“….. due to high work load at MCH center, there mightnot give attention about cervical cancer
seriousness and screening services to themselves and eligible clients….”
31
6. STRENGTH AND LIMITATION OF STUDY
6.1 Strength
Health professionals focused study in order to motivate role modeling provision
Practicality and feasibility of self-administered approach
Volunteering and participation of all MSIE health service providers in the study
Triangulation of both quantitative and qualitative study methods
As best explanatory method qualitative study with health service providers would
identify important factors
The information reported here also presents valuable guidance on the improvement of cervical
cancer screening implantation in the healthcare delivery systems of MSIE.
32
7.1 Conclusions
Knowledge towards Cervical Cancer
The knowledge of providers about cervical cancer with regard to its public health concern
in Ethiopia is not good
Even if cervical cancer is well-known as one of the health issue in Ethiopia, the readiness
for the available trained human resources is minimal
The most well-known and leading risk factors for cervical cancer are multiple sexual
partners, Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI), smoking, HIV infection and HPV
Thewell-known symptoms of cervical cancer are irregular vaginal bleeding, foul smelling
vaginal discharge, post coital bleeding, and dyspanurea
The most well-known cervical cancer screening techniqueswas Pap smear and VIA/VILI
Significant number of providers doesn’t know recommended age of women to be
screened andrecommended cervical cancer screening interval
There is a strong beliefthat all women should undergo screening for cervical cancer.
They believed that manual pelvic exam and speculum exam is important for cervical
cancer screening.
On the contrary, more than half of female respondents believed that they are not at risk of
getting cervical cancer and won’t undergo for screening.
The common factors for low practices for cervical cancer are not having symptom, feeling not at
risk, not giving attention, lack of access,not sexually active, fear of speculum and pelvic area
procedure and Hysterectomy.
33
7.2 Recommendations
In this study it is evident that there have been activities to be retained, improved and included in
the process of implementation ofcervical cancer screening. Based on the findings of this study
results the following points are recommended.
Health care practitioners need to be targeted first for cervical cancer screening because
of their essential role in the implementation of any future screening programs and in
their educative role with patients
HSP need to be trained to provide health education services and will become a role
model to motivate and change others attitudes and practices
Dissemination of health information on risk factors for cervical cancer like multiple
sexual partners, Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI), smoking, HIV infection and
HPV is very important
All partners should also focus on service expansion to maximize access to the service,
so as to minimize missed opportunities
Further studies should be done, to understand and identify the cause of HSP, KAP gap
and misconceptions towards cervical cancer screening to find possible interpretation to
change them
34
REFERENCES
1. Ali F, Kuelker R, Wassie B. Understanding cervical cancer in the context of developing
countries. Ann Trop Med Public Health 2012; 5:3-15.
2. Addis T. Combating Cervical Cancer in Ethiopia. Pathfinder International. 2010.
3. Yifru T, Asheber G. Knowledge attitude and practice of screening for carcinoma of the
cervix among reproductive health clients at three teaching hospitals. Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Reproductive Health 2008; Volume 2, Number 1.
4. Anorlu RI. Cervical cancer: the sub Saharan African perspective. Reprod Health Matters
2008;16:419.
5. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Ministry of Health. Guideline for Cervical
Cancer Prevention and Control in. January 2015.
6. Marie Stopes International Ethiopia. Baseline Survey on Cervical Cancer Screening and
Preventive Treatment (Unpublished).Ethiopia: MSIE; 2014.
8. Birhanu et al. Health seeking behavior for cervical cancer in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.
International Journal for Equity in Health 2012; 11:83 doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-83.
9. GoyalAet al.Knowledge, attitude &practices about cervical cancer and screening among
nursing staff in a teaching hospital. Int J Med Sci Public Health 2013; 2:249-253.
10. WHO /ICO. Human papiloma virus and related cancers in Ethiopia. In Summary report;
2009.
11. World Health Organization.Cervical cancer, human Papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV
vaccine: key pointsfor policymakers and health professionals. World Health
Organization2007.Availablefrom:www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/cancers
RHR_08_14/en/index.htm.
35
12. Denny L, Quinn M, SankaranarayananR.Screening for cervical cancer in developing
countries. Vaccine 2006;24 Suppl 3:S717.
13. Zanotti KM, Kennedy AW. Screening for gynecologic cancer. Med Clin North Am
1999;83:146787.
14. Cervical cancer, human papillomavirus (HPV), and HPV vaccines Key points for
policymakers and healthprofessionals [Internet]. Production. 2007;14. Available from:
http://www.rho.org/files/WHO_PATH_UNFPA_cxca_key_points.pdf.
15. Kitchener HC, Symonds P. Detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in developing
countries. Lancet1999;353:8567.
16. Wright, Thomas C. etal.Alternative approaches to cervical cancer screening for
developing countries. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics &Gynaecology. April
2012Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 197–208.
17. McCareyet al.: Awareness of HPV and cervicalcancer prevention among Cameroonian
healthcare workers.BMCWomen’s Health201111:45.
18. Urasa M, Darj E. Knowledge of cervical cancer and screening practices of nurses at a
regional hospital in Tanzania. African Health Sciences 2011; 11(1):48-57.
19. Anantharaman V, Sudharshini S, Chitra A. A cross-sectional study on knowledge,
attitude, and practice on cervical cancer and screening among female health care
providers of Chennai Corporation, 2013. J Acad Med Sci 2012; 2:124-8.
20. Owoeye I.O.G, Ibrahim I.A. Knowledge and attitudetowards cervical cancer
screeningamong female students and staff in atertiary institution in the Niger Delta.
IntJMed Biomed Res 2013; 2(1):48-56.
21. Leilah Z, Emma S, Stuart M, Emily G, Oguchi N. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices
Regarding Cervical Cancerand Screening among Haitian Health Care Workers. Int. J.
Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11.
22. Mutyaba T, Mmiro FA, Weiderpass E. Knowledge, attitudes and practices on cervical
cancer screening among the medical workers of Mulago Hospital, Uganda. BMC Med
Educ 2006; 6:13.
23. Nwobodo EI, Malami SA. Knowledge and practice of cervical screening among female
health workers in Sokoto, North Western Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2005;12:2557.
36
24. McFarland DM. Cervical cancer and Pap smear screening in Botswana: Knowledge and
perceptions. IntNurs Rev 2003;50:16775.
25. WHO. Policies and managerial guidelines for national cancer control programs. Rev
PanamSaludPublica. 2002;[PubMed].12(5):366–370.
26. Udigwe GO. Knowledge, attitude and practice of cervical cancer screening (Pap smear)
among female nurses in Nnewi, South Eastern Nigeria. Niger J ClinPract 2006; 9:40‑3.
27. Gharoro EP, Ikeanyi EN. An appraisal of the level of awareness and utilization of the Pap
smear as a cervical cancer screening test among female health workers in a tertiary health
institution. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16:1063‑8.
28. Tshering D, Pandup Cervical cancer knowledge and screening behaviors among female
university graduates of year 2012 attending national graduate orientation program,
Bhutan. BMC Womens Health. 2014; 14: 44.
29. O. Awodele et al. A Study on Cervical Cancer Screening Amongst Nurses in Lagos
University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria. J Cancer Educ. 2011 Sep; 26(3): 497–504.
30. Syed F et al, Knowledge and Awareness about Cervical Cancer and Its Prevention
amongst Interns and Nursing Staff in Tertiary Care Hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. PLoS
One. 2010; 5(6): e11059.
31. Xiong-Fei P, et al. Acceptability and Correlates of Primary and Secondary Prevention of
Cervical Cancer among Medical Students in Southwest China: Implications for Cancer
Education.PLoS One. 2014; 9(10): e110353.
37
APPENDICES
Annexes 1- Survey questionnaire (English)
Part I- Consent form
I hope you will participate in the survey as your feedbacks are important. Thank you for your
willingness to be my study participant and taking time to fill study questionnaire.
If you need further clarification about the survey, please contact me any time via
+251911417858 or email: [email protected]
38
Section 1: Background characteristicsof health service providers
2.No
39
Section 2: Knowledge of health service providers towards cervical cancer
S.No Question Response Skip
4 List symptoms of
cervical cancer?
40
Section 3: Knowledge of health service providers towards cervical cancer
screeningprocedures,recommended age and screening intervals
3 In which groups of
women do you ---------------------------------------
recommend cervical
cancer screening?
4 How frequently would
you recommend cervical ---------------------------------------------
cancer screening? And ---------------------------------------------
why?
41
Section 4: Attitude of health service providers towards cervical cancer screening
42
Section 5: Practice of health service providers towards cervical cancer screening
43
Annexes 2. Guide for in- depth Interview with area managers- Qualitative part of study
Qualitative part
2. How would you describe the service provision towards cervical cancer screening at
MSIEservice delivery points?
44
Annexes: 3Amharic questionnaires
ሇማሪስቶፕስኢንተርናሽናልኢትዮጲያየጤናማዕከልአገልግሎትሰጭባሇሙያዎችስሇቅዴመየማህፀንነቀርሳምርመራያሊቸ
ውንእውቀት፣ግንዛቤናየአጠቃቀምሁኔታሇመገምገምየተዘጋጀመጠይቅ
ክፍል 1፡የስምምነትማረጋገጫቅፅ
ጤናይስጥልኝ፣እኔ____________________በአዱስአበባዩኒቨርስቲየህብረተሰብጠናአጠባበቅተማሪነኝ፡፡ይህጥናትናም
ርምርበማሪስቶፕስኢንተርናሽናልኢትዮጲያየጤናማዕከልአገልግሎትሰጭባሇሙያዎችስሇቅዴመየማህፀንነቀርሳምርመራ
ያሊቸውንእውቀት፣ግንዛቤናየአጠቃቀምሁኔታሇመገምገምየተዘጋጀመጠይቅነው፡፡ከዚህጥናትምየሚገኘውውጤትሇባሇሙ
ያዎችበማስረጃየተዯገፈእቅዴሇማቀዴናበዚሁዙሪያተመሳሳይጥናትሇማከናወንሇሚፈልጉአጥኚዎችእንዯመንዯርዯሪያነት
ያገሇግሊልተብሎይታሰባል፡፡
ይህንንበፍቃዯኝነትሊይየተመሰረተመጠይቅሇመሙሊት 15
ዯቂቃየሚፈጅብዎትሲሆንሇመሳተፍካልፈሇጉአይገዯደም፣እንዱሁምመሳተፍከጀመሩበኋሊበማንኛውምጊዜአቋርጠውመ
ውጣትይችሊለ፡፡
ሇጥያቄዎቹየሚሰጥዋቸውመልሶችበሙለሚስጥራዊነታቸውየተጠበቀይሆናል፡፡ስሇዚህስሇማንነትዎእናስሇሚሰጥዋቸው
መልሶችበምስጥርመጠበቅምንምአይነትስጋትአይግባዎ፡፡የእርስዎበዚህጥናትውስጥተሳታፊመሆንሇጥናቱበተሳካሁኔታ
መጠናቀቅብቻሳይሆንሇማህፀንበርነቀርሳቅዴመምርመራዘዳአገልግሎትመሻሻልከፍተኛአስተዋፅኦስሇሚኖረውበዚህጥናት
ውስጥእንዱሳተፉበአክብሮትእጠይቃሇሁ፡፡
እሳተፋሇሁ __________________
አልሳተፍም _________________
ሇመሳተፍፍቃዯኛከሆኑወዯቀጣዮቹጥያቄዎችይሇፉ፡፡ሇመሳተፍፈቃዯኛካልሆኑዯግሞአመስግነውጥያቄውንያ
ቋርጡ፡፡
45
ክፍል 1:የተጠያቂው አጠቃሊይየማህበራዊመረጃየተመሇከተመጠይቅ
46
ክፍል 2:የማህፀን በርነቀርሳየእውቀትዯረጃንየሚዲስስመጠይቅ
3 የማህፀንበርነቀርሳበሽታምልክቶችንዘርዝር
ተ ጥያቅዎች መልስ እሇ
ራ ፍ
ቁ.
1 የCervical cancer _________________
ምርመራማዴረግየበሽታውምልክቶችከመታየታቸውበፊትማ ____
ወቅያስችሊል?
2 የማህፀንበርነቀርሳመመርመሪያዘዳዎችንዘርዝር _________________
____
3 በምንአይነትሁኔታሊይሊለሴቶችየcervical cancer
ምርመራንይመክራለ?
4 የcervical cancer
ምርመራንበየስንትጊዜውማረግጥሩነውይሊለ? ሇምን?
47
ተ ጥያቅዎች መልስ እሇፍ
ራ
ቁ.
1 ሇማህፀንበርካንሰርተጋሊጭነኝብሇውያስባለ? 1. አዎ ወንዴከሆንክወዯጥ
2. አይ ያቄቁጥር 3 እሇፍ
3. አሊውቅም
2 የማህፀንበርካንሰርምርመራማዴረግአሇብኝብሇውያ 1. አዎ
ስባለ? 2. አይ……………
መልሶአይከሆነምክንያቶንባድቦታውሊይይፃፉ፡፡ ……….
3. አሊውቅም
3 ሁለምሴቶችየcervical cancer 1. አዎ……………
ምርመራማዴረግአሇባቸውብሇውይመክራለ? ………..
ሇምን? 2. አይ……………
………...
3. አሊውቅም
4 የcervical cancer 1. አዎ
ምርመራመዯረግያሇበትየበሽታውምልክትከታየበኃ 2. አይ
ሊብቻነውብሇውያስባለ? 3. አሊውቅም
5 ወሲብየማትፈፅምሴትየcervical cancer 1. አዎ
ምርመራማዴረግአሇባትብሇውይመክራለ? 2. አይ
3. አሊውቅም
6 በMSIEክሉኒኮችህክምናያገኙሴቶችበሙለሇcervi 1. አዎ……………
cal cancer ………..
ምርመራእጩናቸውብሇውያስባለ?ሇምን? 2. አይ……………
………...
3. አሊወቅም
7 የማህፅንምርመራ (Pelvic exam)ሇcervical 1. አዎ
cancer ምርመራአስፈሊጊነውብሇውያስባለ? 2. አይ
3. አሊውቅም
8 የማህፀንበርማያመሳሪያ (Speculum 1. አዎ
examination) ሇcervical cancer 2. አይ
ምርመራአስፈሊጊነውብሇውያስባለ? 3. አሊውቅም
48
2 ባሇቤትዎ/ጓዯኛዎየcervical 1. አዎ ሴትከሆንሽወዯጥያቄቁጥር
cancer 2. አይ 3፣ 4፣ 5 እሇፊ
ምርመራአዴርገውያውቃለ? 3. አሊውቅም
3 ሇcervical cancer 1. አዎ የሊቦራቶሪባሇሙያከሆኑወዯ
ምርመራሇመጣችሴትየማህፅንም 2. አይ……………… ጥያቄቁጥር 5 ይሇፉ
ርመራ (Pelvic exam) …….
ሰርተውያውቃለ?
መልስዎአይከሆነልምን?
4 ሇcervical cancer 1. አዎ
ምርመራሇመጣችሴትየማህፀንበ 2. አይ………………
ርማያመሳሪያ (Speculum …..
examination)ሰርተውያውቃለ?
መልስዎአይከሆነልምን?
5 የcervical cancer 1. አዎ
ምርመራአገልግሎትሰጥተውያው 2. አይ………………
ቃለ? መልስዎአይከሆነልምን? ..
DECLARATION
I, the undersigned, declare that this is my original work has never been presented in this or any
other university and that all source material used for the thesis has been duly acknowledged.
49
Name: Bogalech Fufa
Signature……………
This thesis has been submitted for examination with my approval as a University Advisor:
Name: Dr.MulugetaBetre
Signature…………………
50