Law of Crimes II (Criminal Procedure Code)
Law of Crimes II (Criminal Procedure Code)
Law of Crimes II (Criminal Procedure Code)
The Judiciary is well established with quite a lengthy and complex hierarchy
of courts. The judicial system has been established in such a way so that it
caters the need of each and every person of the country. The Judicial system
in India is in the form of a pyramid, with the Supreme Court being at the top
of the hierarchy.
Following the classification of the various criminal courts under the
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.
1. The Sessions Judge– Section 9 of the CrPc talks about the establishment of
the Sessions Court. The State Government establishes the Sessions Court
which has to be presided by a Judge appointed by the High Court. The High
Court appoints Additional as well as Assistant Sessions Judges. The Court of
Sessions ordinarily sits at such place or places as ordered by the High Court.
But in any particular case, if the Court of Session is of the opinion that it will
have to cater to the convenience of the parties and witnesses, it shall preside its
sittings at any other place, after the consent of the prosecution and the
accused. According to section 10 of the CrPC, the assistant sessions judges are
answerable to the sessions judge.
2. The Additional/ Assistant Sessions Judge- These are appointed by the High
Court of a particular state. They are responsible for cases relating to murders,
theft, dacoity, pick-pocketing and other such cases in case of absence of the
Sessions Judge.
3. The Judicial Magistrate– In every district, which is not a metropolitan area,
there shall be as many as Judicial Magistrates of first class and of second class.
The presiding officers shall be appointed by the High Courts. Every Judicial
Magistrate shall be subordinate to the Sessions Judge.
4. Chief Judicial Magistrate- Except for the Metropolitan area, the Judicial
Magistrate of the first class shall be appointed as the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
Only the Judicial Magistrate of First Class may be designated as Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate.
5. Metropolitan Magistrate- They are established in Metropolitan areas. The
High Courts have the power to appoint the presiding officers. The Metropolitan
Magistrate shall be appointed as the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate. The
Metropolitan Magistrate shall work under the instructions of the Sessions
Judge.
6. Executive Magistrate- According to section 20 in every district and in every
metropolitan area, an Executive Magistrate shall be appointed by the State
Government and one of them becomes District Magistrate.
Power Of The Court To Pass Sentences:
The power of the various subordinate courts is mentioned from section 26-35,
under the Code of Criminal Procedure
1. Sentences which High Courts and Sessions Judges may pass:
According to section 28, A High Court may pass any sentence authorised by
law. A Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge may pass any sentence
authorised by law; but any sentence of death passed by any such Judge
shall be subject to confirmation by the High Court. An Assistant Sessions
Judge may pass any sentence authorised by law except a sentence of death
or of imprisonment for life or of imprisonment for a term exceeding ten
years. Thus, section 26 enumerates the types of Courts in which different
offences can be tried and then under section 28, it spells out the limits of
sentences which such Courts are authorised to pass.
2. Sentences which Magistrates may pass:
Section 29 lays down the quantum of sentence which different categories of
Magistrates are empowered to impose. The powers of individual categories of
Magistrates to pass the sentence are as under:
The Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate may pass any sentence authorised
by law except a sentence of death or of imprisonment for life or of
imprisonment for a term exceeding seven years.
The Court of a Magistrate of the first class may pass a sentence of
imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, or of fine not exceeding
five thousand rupees, or of both.
The Court of a Magistrate of the second class may pass a sentence of
imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year, or of fine not exceeding one
thousand rupees, or of both.
The Court of a Chief Metropolitan Magistrate shall have the powers of the
Court of a Chief Judicial Magistrate and that of a Metropolitan Magistrate,
the powers of the Court of a Magistrate of the first class.
3. Sentence of imprisonment in default of fine:
When a fine is imposed on an accused and it is not paid, the law provides
that he can be imprisoned for a term in addition to a substantive
imprisonment awarded to him, if any. Section 30 defines the limits of
Magistrates powers to award imprisonment in default of payment of fine.
Ans:
Section 41 enumerates the different categories of cases in which an officer of the
Police Department may arrest an individual without an order from a Magistrate
and a warrant.
The circumstances when police can arrest a person without warrant are
following:
1. A person who has been concerned with and in any cognizable offence or against
whom a reasonable complaint has been filed, or credible information has been
received, or a reasonable suspicion surrounds the person, of his having been so
concerned.
2. A person who has an item in his possession without any lawful excuse, the
burden of proving which excuse shall lie on such a person, any implement of
housebreaking.
3. A person who has been proclaimed as an offender either under the Code or by
order of the State Government.
4. A person who is in possession of anything that may reasonably be suspected to
be stolen property and a person who may be reasonably be suspected of having
committed an offence with a reference of such a thing.
5. A person who obstructs the functioning of a police officer while in the execution
of his duty, or who have escaped, or attempts to escape, from lawful custody.
6. An individual who is reasonably suspected of being a deserter from any of the
Armed Forces of the Union.
7. A person who has been involved in, or against whom a reasonable complaint
has been made, or credible information has been obtained, or a reasonable
suspicion exists, of his having been involved in, any act committed at any country
or a place out of India which, if done in India, would have been considered and
punishable as an offence, and for which he is, under any law concerned to
extradition, or otherwise, liable to be apprehended or detained in custody in India.
8. A person who was a released convict and commits a breach of any rule, relating
to the notification of the residence or change of or absence from the place of
residence.
9. A person for whose arrest any requisition, regardless of being written or oral,
has been received from another officer, provided that the order specifies the
individual to be arrested and the crime or other causes for which the detainment
is to be done, and it appears therefrom that the individual might lawfully be
arrested without a warrant by the officer who issued the requisition