Poursaee 2008
Poursaee 2008
Poursaee 2008
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: It is almost impossible to produce crack-free concrete and, therefore, codes of concrete structural design
Received 28 June 2007 (such as ACI 318 [ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, American Concrete Institute:
Accepted 25 March 2008 Farmington Hills, MI, USA]) take cracking into account and relate permissible crack widths to exposure
conditions. Chloride ingress is significantly enhanced by cracks because the ions can penetrate the concrete
Keywords:
cover from the walls of the crack as well as from the outer surface of the concrete [P. P. Win, M. Watanabe,
Corrosion (C)
High performance concrete (E)
and A. Machida, Penetration profile of chloride ion in cracked reinforced concrete. Cement and Concrete
Curing (A) Research, 2004. 34(7): p. 1073–1079]. Thus, while the chlorides reach the steel very rapidly directly through
Crack the crack, they also reach adjacent areas of steel more rapidly than in uncracked concrete.
The objective of the project was to ascertain whether high performance concrete (HPC) could provide
superior protection to Ordinary Portland Cement Concrete (OPCC) even when the structure was cracked
parallel to the reinforcing bars (longitudinal cracks) while being exposed to a de-icing salt environment. Two
HPCs, as specified by the Ministry of Transportation of Ontario (MTO) [MTO, SSP 904 S13 High Performance
Concrete, Amendment to OPSS 904 Construction Specification for Concrete Structures. 1995, Ontario
Provincial Standard Specification] were tested: both used blended silica fume cement (Canadian Type 10 E-
SF) and had 25% replacement of the cement by either fly ash or ground granulated blast furnace slag. A Class
C-2 ordinary Portland cement concrete was used as control.
In the case of cracks parallel to the rebar, HPC does not appear to have any beneficial influence on the
corrosion of bars, which is not surprising in view of the fact that the whole length of the bar is directly
exposed to the environment via the crack. In contrast, HPC has been found to provide better protection for
steel exposed to transverse cracks than does OPCC. However, the benefits of HPC are not as great as they are
for sound (uncracked) concrete. The reasons for the better protection are (i) the greater resistance of HPC to
chloride penetration from the walls of the crack, (ii) its greater tendency to crack healing and (ii) the different
crack path in HPC.
Crown Copyright © 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0008-8846/$ – see front matter. Crown Copyright © 2008 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.018
A. Poursaee, C.M. Hansson / Cement and Concrete Research 38 (2008) 1098–1105 1099
Table 1
Concrete mixture proportions for making 1 m3 concrete
been relatively few studies concerning the critical crack widths and
other aspects of the effect of cracking on corrosion of rebar in OPC
concretes [20–26], and even fewer on the influence of cracking on Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of a prism with longitudinal crack. Corrosion probes are
rebar corrosion in HPC [27–31]. Moreover, all this work has concerned embedded in three levels.
cracks formed transverse to the reinforcing bar.
While there has been some investigation of longitudinal cracks in “estimate” rather than “determine” is that it is impossible to non-
cover concrete formed as a result of corrosion [32–34], as far as the destructively determine the area of steel which is actually undergoing
present authors have been able to ascertain, there is nothing in the active corrosion without removing the concrete cover. There have been
literature about the effect of longitudinal structural cracks on the many attempts to design equipment which can limit the area being
corrosion of the embedded steel in concrete. Such cracks are observed polarised and, thus, limit the uncertainty in the measurements but these
in practice in the concrete structures such as continuously reinforced have not been entirely satisfactory [41]. An alternative approach is to
concrete pavements (CRCP) due to loading or thermal shock, steel limit the actual area of steel by measuring the corrosion on small
reinforced concrete pipes and parking garage slabs, [35–39]. sections of reinforcing steel (corrosion probes) rather than on the main
In this paper, the corrosion behaviour of steel bar in longitudinally rebar [42]. The advantage of the embedded probes is knowledge of the
cracked HPC and OPCC with crack widths b0.3 mm (the MTO's maximum area of steel, which could be corroding. The major
maximum allowable limit) is evaluated and the results are compared disadvantages are (i) the limited area for corrosion to initiate; and (ii)
with those obtained in sound (i.e. uncracked) concrete and transver- the limited area of steel available for the cathodic reduction of oxygen.
sely cracked (cracks perpendicular to the rebar) concretes. Three concrete prisms, 100 × 100 × 500 mm, were cast for each of
the three concretes. The individual probe elements (30 mm lengths of
2. Experimental procedure 10 M bar) were assembled as illustrated in Fig. 1 by attaching them to a
polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) rod, together with a 30 mm length
This study involves three different concrete mixtures: one OPCC of 316 stainless steel bar as a “reference electrode”. All probe elements
and two HPCs designed to meet the specifications of the MTO, which and the stainless steel were electrically isolated from each other.
require the use of silica fume cement and permit up to 25% cement Probes assemblies were placed at three cover depths, 10 mm and
replacement by either blast furnace slag or class C fly ash [3]. The 15 mm, as illustrated schematically in Fig. 2. Casting was carried out
concretes were provided by Dufferin Concrete and their mixture indoors in February and the prisms were wet cured according to MTO
proportions are given in Table 1. specification (2 days for OPCC and 7 days for HPCs). After 25 days, the
Three sets of concrete prism samples with embedded plain carbon prisms were exposed to the outdoor environment for the remaining
steel rebar were prepared as follows: period of the project and were covered with a layer of rock salt and
kept wet by spraying salt water during the winter months. The
i) with cracks parallel to, and immediately above, the rebar and composition of the rock salt is given in Table 2.
referred to as “longitudinal cracks”; The outdoor temperature during the experiment was monitored and
ii) with cracks perpendicular to the rebar and referred to as is shown in Fig. 3. The temperature fluctuations and the difference
“transverse cracks”; between thermal expansion coefficient of the PMMA plastic bars
iii) without any macrocracks, referred to as “sound concrete”. (∼75× 10− 6 °C− 1) [43] and that of the cement paste, (∼15 ×10− 6 °C− 1)
caused cracking of the concrete parallel to the PMMA bars and, thus,
2.1. Prisms with longitudinal crack parallel to the rebar probes within the first month of exposure. The cracks
were approximately 0.1 mm wide at the surface, as shown in Fig. 4.
Since it is not practical to evaluate the corrosion behaviour of steel in The corrosion potential was measured after 128 weeks of exposure
concrete by gravimetric methods, the rates are usually estimated using and the corrosion rates were determined using the potentiostatic
electrochemical techniques [40]. The reason for using the term Linear Polarisation Resistance (LPR) technique after 35 weeks and
128 weeks exposure.
Table 2
Relative proportions of ions in rock salt
Fig. 3. Outdoor temperature variations during the experiment on the samples with longitudinal cracks.
Fig. 4. 0.1 mm longitudinal crack, caused by thermal expansion coefficient difference between PMMA and concrete.
Fig. 5. Schematic plan of the a prism with 0.1 mm induced transverse crack. Fig. 7. Schematic plan of the LPR measurement setup on G109 specimens.
A. Poursaee, C.M. Hansson / Cement and Concrete Research 38 (2008) 1098–1105 1101
Fig. 8. Corrosion current density of the probes in prisms with 0.1 mm longitudinal crack, 35 and 128 weeks after exposure to de-icing salt.
Fig. 9. Corrosion potential of the probes in prisms with 0.1 mm longitudinal crack, 128 weeks after exposure to de-icing salt.
ensure an induced crack intersected one of the probe elements. All probe 2.3. Sound concrete specimens
elements and the stainless steel were electrically isolated from the main
bar and from each other. After casting, the OPCC and HPC prisms were wet A standard ASTM G109 specimen design [45] was used for
cured for 2 and 7 days, respectively. Then, the prisms were loaded in 4- determining the relative corrosion protection provided by the different
point bending until a crack was formed. A stainless steel shim was inserted concretes (without macrocracks) using both macrocell and microcell
into the groove to retain the crack opening to 0.1 mm. Fig. 5 shows a corrosion measurements. A comparison of the two measurements has
schematic drawing of the prism. The prisms were covered with rock salt been published [46]. The microcell data are used for comparison here.
solution and kept wet and the corrosion activity of the steel probes was The specimen is illustrated schematically in Fig. 6 and the concretes
monitored using LPR measurements for over a 124 week period. were cast and cured as described above. The ponding well was filled
with a 3 wt.% NaCl solution for two of every 4 weeks. Microcell
corrosion was measured by using the LPR technique. For this purpose,
the top bars were disconnected from the bottom bars for a period of
48 h to allow the system to stabilise. A saturated calomel electrode
reference electrode and a stainless steel counter electrode were
immersed in the ponding well as illustrated schematically in Fig. 7.
Fig. 10. Fracture surface of one of the prisms with 0.1 mm longitudinal crack, 128 weeks
1
after exposure to de-icing salt. Percentage error ¼ standard deviation
mean value 100.
1102 A. Poursaee, C.M. Hansson / Cement and Concrete Research 38 (2008) 1098–1105
Fig. 11. Top steel probes recovered from three of the prisms with longitudinal crack after 128 weeks of exposure to de-icing salt: (a) before removing the corrosion products, (b) after
removing the corrosion products.
state, with corrosion rates of ∼ 4 × 10− 4 A/m2 or ∼ 0.45 μm/year and average corrosion rates of the top probe elements are between 1.3× 10− 2
there is no distinction between those embedded in OPCC and those in and 2.5 × 10− 2 A/m2 or 15–30 μm/year and their corrosion potentials all
the HPCs. After 128 weeks exposure to salt, however, all the probe lie between −400 and −450 mV CSE. The probe elements with the
elements exhibited active corrosion. Corrosion current densities and 15 mm cover depth and, presumably, a lower chloride content, exhibit
corrosion potentials of the top probes (10 mm cover) and the lower corrosion rates between 8 × 10− 3 and 1.1 × 10− 2 A/m2 or 9–13 μm/year,
probes (15 mm cover) are shown in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively. The with corrosion potentials between −280 and −300 mV SCE.
Fig. 12. Comparison between the corrosion current densities, calculated based on nominal and actual corroded surface areas.
A. Poursaee, C.M. Hansson / Cement and Concrete Research 38 (2008) 1098–1105 1103
Fig. 13. Concrete resistance at different levels; prisms with 0.1 mm longitudinal crack; 128 weeks after exposure to de-icing salt.
Two observations can be made from these data: first that there is period during which the corroded area increased but the corrosion
no significant difference between the corrosion rates and potentials of rate in the actively corroding locations is unchanged.
the steel in OPCC and those in HPC-slag (HPC/S) concretes. Second, the The resistances of the concretes, measured over a 70 mm diameter
steel in top probes of the HPC-fly ash (HPC/F) concrete is corroding at a area encompassing the crack, after 128 weeks exposure, using
marginally lower rate but the steel with the greater cover depth galvanostatic pulse technique, are shown in Fig. 13. It is obvious that
exhibits the same rates as those in the other two concretes. the resistances of both HPCs are significantly higher than that of OPCC,
To confirm the results obtained by electrochemical measurements, even at the crack. Therefore, considering the concrete resistance as an
prisms were broken and the steel probes and adjacent concrete were indicator for comparable corrosion activity, in HPC and OPCC may result
visually inspected. Visual observation of crack paths showed that they in an under-estimation of the corrosion resistance provided by the HPC.
included the interface between the concrete and the steel rebars The corrosion rates of each probe in the prisms with the 0.1 mm
(Fig. 10). The bonding between concrete and the steel segments was transverse cracks after 124 weeks of exposure to salt solution are
also checked and showed that the segments were completely em- given in Fig. 14. It had been assumed that the crack would intersect
bedded in concrete (Fig. 11a) and the concrete compaction was good. one of the probe elements giving a higher corrosion rate for that
Results from visual observations are in agreement with corrosion probe element than for the other four. However, this was not the case:
measurements and verify that there is no apparent difference the highest corrosion rate occurred on different probe elements
between the corrosion activities in OPCC and both HPCs. Continuous at different times. This could be attributed to a number of factors: (i)
areas of the steel were covered with corrosion products as indicated in the crack intersecting two probes at their overlap point; (ii) crack
Fig. 11a. After removing the corrosion products, using an inhibited acid branching and more than one crack at the level of the probes as has
solution [47], the surface was clearly pitted as shown in Fig. 11b. been observed in concurrent research [48]; (iii) and/or (iv) the effect of
However, the pits were distributed over an area of the surface, not chloride diffusion from the crack surfaces. Consequently, the data in
specifically along the intersection with the crack because, as Fig. 13 are the average corrosion rates of the two probes with the
mentioned above, the crack continued around the surface of the highest corrosion rates in each of three replicate prisms.
steel. The actual corroded surface areas of the steel segments were In contrast to the corrosion behaviour of steel in the longitudinally
estimated and the corrosion current densities were re-calculated cracked prisms, the corrosion current densities of steel in these HPCs are
based on these corroded areas and are given in Fig. 12 together with distinctly lower than those in the OPCC. Even after almost 2.5 years
those based on the nominal areas. Although, the nominal corrosion exposure in the laboratory to saturated salt solution, the corrosion
current densities are higher at the top levels than the lower level, the current densities of both HPCs are in the passive range (10− 3–10− 4 A/m2
actual corrosion rates at both levels are very close. It is concluded the [40]) whereas steel in the OPCC has a similar corrosion rate to that of the
chlorides reached the top bars first and initiated corrosion before steel in the longitudinally cracked HPC-slag with a 15 mm cover depth,
reaching the lower bars. Thus, the top bars were corroding for a longer i.e. ∼0.007 A/m2. Previous work [49,50] has shown that the corrosion of
Fig. 14. Corrosion current density of the probes in prisms with 0.1 mm transverse crack, 124 weeks after exposure to de-icing salt.
1104 A. Poursaee, C.M. Hansson / Cement and Concrete Research 38 (2008) 1098–1105
Fig. 15. Microcell corrosion current density of steel in sound concrete, 132 and 180 weeks after exposure to de-icing salt.
steel in HPCs is usually over a small area, probably confined to the tip of are very similar. This indicates that increasing the chloride concentra-
the crack, whereas the corrosion extends along the bar on either side of a tion, increases the corroded area but the local corrosion rate remains
crack in OPCC. However, in the current prisms, probably due to approximately constant.
branching of the crack, this is not the case. For the longitudinally cracked concretes, the concrete resistances
It should be mentioned that in the prisms with transverse cracks, the of both HPCs are higher than of OPCC while the corrosion current
measured corrosion current density is lower than those of prisms with densities of steel in all concretes are very similar. Therefore, using
longitudinal crack. The reason is that the nominal surface area of the bars, concrete resistance as an indicator of corrosion in HPC is not recom-
not the actual corroding area, was used for the calculations. The corrosion mended particularly at the locations of longitudinal cracks.
at the tip of the crack in those samples was observed to be more localised.
The average values of microcell data from the steel in the sound Acknowledgments
concrete after 132 week of exposure are given in Fig. 15. As can be seen,
there is no significant difference in corrosion rate of steel in the OPCC This research is part of a larger project on High Performance
and both HPCs and the values all indicate passivity. Therefore, for Concrete funded by the Cement Association of Canada (CAC), the
comparative purposes, corrosion rates of these specimens after 180 days Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada and Materials and
are also shown in Fig. 14. It is clear that, after this period, there is a very Manufacturing Ontario. The authors appreciate the support of Mr. Rico
significant effect of concrete on the corrosion rates. The corrosion rates Fung of the CAC and gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Samuel
of the steel in the HPCs (∼10− 3 A/m2) is at the upper end of the passive Okulaja, Alain Laurent, Richard Morrison and Doug Hirst.
range, suggesting that there may be some active corrosion over a small
area of the steel. On the other hand, the corrosion rate of steel in the References
OPCC was ∼1.6× 10− 2 A/m2 and is clearly corroding.
4. Summary and conclusion [1] ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, American Concrete
Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
[2] P.P. Win, M. Watanabe, A. Machida, Penetration profile of chloride ion in cracked
The behaviour of HPC containing 25% fly ash and HPC containing reinforced concrete, Cement and Concrete Research 34 (7) (2004) 1073–1079.
25% slag is very similar in both sound and cracked concretes and so [3] MTO, SSP 904 S13 High Performance Concrete, Amendment to OPSS 904 Construction
there is no apparent advantage to the use of one or the other. Specification for Concrete Structures. 1995, Ontario Provincial Standard Specification.
[4] S. Rostam, Reinforced concrete structures — shall concrete remain the dominating
There is no significant difference between resistance provided to means of corrosion prevention? Materials and Corrosion 54 (6) (2003) 369–378.
rebar by OPCC and both HPCs when the concrete exhibits a longitudinal [5] A.A. Ramezanianpour, V.M. Malhotra, Effect of curing on the compressive strength
structural crack, even when the crack is only ∼0.1 mm wide at the resistance to chloride — ion penetration and porosity of concretes incorporating
slag, fly ash or silica fume, Cement & Concrete Composites 17 (1995) 125–133.
surface, i.e. well below the allowable limit of 0.3 mm given by the MTO. [6] Y. Ballim, Curing and the durability of OPC, fly ash and blast-furnace slag concretes,
When a 0.1 mm structural transverse crack exists, the HPC Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions 26 (158) (1993) 238–244.
provides additional protection to the steel, by limiting the area of [7] N.R. El-Sakhawy, H.S. El-Dien, M.E. Ahmed, K.A. Bendary, Influence of curing on
durability performance of concrete, Magazine of Concrete Research 51 (5) (1999)
steel participating in the corrosion process for the anodic and cathodic
309–318.
half-cell components of the process. The protection is not as good as in [8] R. Gagne, G. Henault, J. Marchand, In-situ and laboratory evaluation of chloride
sound concrete, but after about 124 weeks of exposure to de-icing penetration and freeze–thaw durability of high performance concrete slabs,
salts, steel in both HPCs exhibits a corrosion rate at least five times Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concrete under Severe
Conditions, E & FN Spon, Tromso, Norway, 1998.
lower than that of steel in OPCC. [9] M. Pigeon, F. Garnier, R. Pleau, P.C. Aitcin, Influence of drying on the chloride ion
High performance concrete, produced as specified by the MTO, permeability of HPC, Concrete International (1993) 65–69 (February).
provides vastly superior protection to steel in sound concrete than does [10] M.D.A. Thomas, C.M. Evans, Chloride penetration in high-performance concrete
containing silica fume and fly ash, Proceedings of the Second International
a Class-C ordinary Portland cement concrete. For steel in both types of Conference on Concrete under Severe Conditions, E & FN Spon, Tromso, Norway,1998.
HPC, the corrosion rate is approximately an order of magnitude lower [11] V. Baroghel-Bouny, P. Rogeau, T. Chaussadent, S. Care, Comparative study of the
than that of steel in OPCC after 180 weeks exposure to chlorides. durability of ordinary and high performance concrete as part of the “BHP 2000”
French National Project, International Symposium on High Performance and
The cover depth does influence the corrosion rate even when the Reactive Powder Concretes, 1998, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC.
bar is exposed to a longitudinal crack. However, the effect ap- [12] P. Fidjestol, K. Tuutti, Chloride induced corrosion in high performance concrete —
pears to be in the area of steel which is actively corroding: the cor- lifetime versus diffusivity and resistivity, Proceedings of the Second International
Conference on Concrete under Severe Conditions, E & F N Spon, Tromso, Norway,1998.
rosion current densities based on the nominal corrosion surface areas,
[13] N. Gowripalan, H.M. Mohame, Chloride-induced corrosion of galvanized and
are higher for probes with a 10 mm cover than for those with a 15 mm ordinary steel reinforcement in high-performance concrete, Cement and Concrete
cover, but the actual current densities for the activity corroding areas Research 28 (8) (1998) 1119–1131.
A. Poursaee, C.M. Hansson / Cement and Concrete Research 38 (2008) 1098–1105 1105
[14] J. Ryell, M.D.A. Thomas, P.R. Trunk, Properties of, and service life predictions for high [33] B. Shi, G. Zhao, Advance in bond behavior of concrete elements with corroded
performance concrete in transportation structures, Eight International Conference on rebar, Jianzhu Cailiao Xuebao (Journal of Building Materials) 8 (6) (2005) 653–659.
Durability of Building Materials and Composites, 1999, NRC Research Press, [34] M. Maalej, S. Ahmed, P. Paramasivam, Corrosion durability and structural response
Vancouver, BC. of functionally-graded concrete beams, JCI International Workshop on Ductile
[15] C. Hansson, S. Jaffer, and K. Olsen, Chloride threshold values for corrosion of steel in Fiber Reinforced Cementitous Composites (DFRCC) — Application and Evaluation,
blended cement concretes. In press. 2002, Takayama, Japan.
[16] P.K. Mehta, Concrete Structure, Properties and Materials, Prentice-Hall Inc., [35] J.R. Roesler, J.S. Popovics, J.L. Ranchero, M. Mueller, D. Lippert, Longitudinal cracking
Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 1986. distress on continuously reinforced concrete pavements in Illinois, Journal of
[17] M.E. Ismail, H.R. Soleymani, Monitoring corrosion rate for ordinary Portland Performance of Constructed Facilities 19 (4) (2005) 331–338.
concrete (OPC) and high performance concrete (HPC) specimens subject to chloride [36] J.S. Miller, W.Y. Bellinger, Distress Identification Manual for the Long-term
attack, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 29 (2002) 863–874. Pavement, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 2003.
[18] P.C. Aïtcin, A.M. Neville, P. Acker, Integrated view of shrinkage deformation, [37] The facts about cracking in steel reinforced concrete pipe, Concrete Pipe Association of
Concrete International, 1997, pp. 35–41. Australasia: http://www.concpipe.asn.au/Technical_Info/Publications_pdf/FactSheets/
[19] ACI committe 224, Causes, Evaluation and Repair of Cracks in Concrete Structures, FS4_05.pdf.
American Concrete Institute, 1998. [38] J.M. Ruiz, R.O. Rasmussen, G.K. Chang, J.C. Dick, P.K. Nelson, Computer-based
[20] C. Andrade, C. Alonzo, F.J. Molina, Cover cracking as a function of rebar corrosion: guidelines for concrete pavements .Volume II — design and construction
Part II — numerical model, Materials and Structures 26 (1993) 532–548. guidelines and HIPERPAV II user's manual, Office of Infrastructure Research and
[21] R. Francois, G. Arliguie, A. Castel, Influence of service cracking on service life of Development, Federal Highway Administration, 2005.
reinforced concrete, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on [39] Concrete pavement technology, in Early cracking of concrete pavement, causes
Concrete under Severe Conditions, E & FN Spon, Tromso, Norway, 1998. and repairs 2002, American Pavement Concrete Association: http://www.
[22] A.W. Beeby, Cracking, cover and corrosion of reinforcement, Concrete Interna- iowaconcretepaving.org/ACPA%20Publications/tb016p.pdf.
tional (1983) 35–40 (February). [40] C.M. Hansson, Comments on electrochemical measurements of the rate of
[23] S. Moringa, Remaining service life of reinforced concrete structure after corrosion corrosion of steel in concrete, Cement and Concrete Research 14 (1984) 574–584.
cracking, Durability of Building Materials and Components, E & F.N.Spon, Stockholm, [41] O.K. Gepraegs, C.M. Hansson, A comparative evaluation of three commercial
Sweden, 1996. instruments for field measurements of reinforcing steel corrosion rates, Electro-
[24] C. Andrade, C. Alonso, F.J. Molina, Cover cracking as a function of bar corrosion. Part chemical Techniques for Evaluating Corrosion Performance and Estimating
I — experimental test, Materials and Structures 26 (1993) 453–464. Service-life of Reinforced Concrete, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2004.
[25] R. Francois, G. Arliguie, Effect of microcracking and cracking on the development of [42] C.M. Hansson, P.T. Seabrook, T.D. Marcotte, In-place corrosion monitoring,
corrosion in reinforced concrete members, Magazine of Concrete Research 51 (2) (1999) Concrete International 26 (7) (2004) 59–65.
143–150. [43] MatWeb. 2006, http://www.matweb.com.
[26] R. Francois, G. Arliguie, Influence of service cracking on reinforcement steel [44] C.M. Hansson, The effects of high performance concrete on corrosion of
corrosion, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 10 (1) (1998) 14–20. reinforcement, PCA R&D Project 00-07 Serial No. 2676, Portland Cement
[27] R. Weiermair, C.M. Hansson, P.T. Seabrook, M. Tullmin, Corrosion measurements Association (PCA), 2004.
on steel embedded in high performance concrete exposed to a marine [45] ASTM G109-02, Standard Test Method for Determining the Effect of Chemical
environment, Third CANMET/ACI International Conference on Concrete in Marine Admixtures on the Corrosion of Embedded Steel Reinforcement in Concrete
Environment, American Concrete Institute, St. Andrews by the Sea, New Exposed to Chloride Environments, American Society for Testing Materials, West
Brunswick, Canada, 1996. Conshocken, PA, 1992, pp. 451–455.
[28] A.R. Mendoza, Corrosion of reinforcing steel in loaded cracked concretes exposed [46] C.M. Hansson, A. Poursaee, A. Laurent, Macrocell and microcell corrosion of steel in
to de-icing salts, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo, ordinary Portland cement and high performance concretes, Cement and Concrete
Waterloo, Ontario, 2003. Research 36 (2006) 2098–2102.
[29] C.M. Hansson, S.A. Okulaja, Corrosion of reinforcing steel in cracked high [47] ASTM, G1-90, Standard Practice for Preparing, Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion
performance concrete, Advances in Cement and Concrete, University of Illinois Test Specimens, ASTM, 1999.
at Urbana - Champaign, Copper Mountain, CO, USA, 2003. [48] S.J. Jaffer, The Influence of Loading Mode and Concrete Type on the Corrosion of
[30] R. Weiermair, C.M. Hansson, P.T. Seabrook, M. Tullmin, The durability of high Steel in Concrete. PhD thesis in Mechanical Engineering, University of Waterloo,
performance concrete in a marine environment, Concrete in Marine Environ- 2007.
ments, ACI, St. Andrews-by-the-Sea, 1995. [49] T.D. Marcotte, C.M. Hansson, The influence of silica fume on the corrosion
[31] T. Thuresson, C.M. Hansson, P.T. Seabrook, M. Tullmin, Effect of accelerated curing resistance of steel in high performance concrete exposed to simulated sea water,
and cracking on the corrosion protection of steel embedded in high performance Journal of Materials Science 38 (2003) 4765–4776.
concrete, Durability of Concrete — Fourth CANMET/ACI International Conference, [50] T.D. Marcotte, C.M. Hansson, A comparison of the chloride-induced corrosion
CANMET/ACI, Sydney, Australia, 1997. products from steel-reinforced industrial standard versus high performance
[32] K. Okada, K. Kobayashi, T. Miyagawa, Influence of longitudinal cracking due to concrete exposed to simulated sea water, International Symposium on High
reinforcement corrosion on characteristics of reinforced concrete members, ACI Performance and Reactive Powder Concretes, University of Sherbrooke, Sher-
Structural Journal 85 (2) (1988) 134–140. brooke, Canada, 1998.