Pre-Project Planning - 7

Concept 1
1. This paper makes mention of the need to improve relationships

throughout the construction supply chain. Why are these
relationships valuable? Think of a time that you worked on a
project where relationships were poor overall, or communication
was broken between particular people. What issues did this cause
for the project, and how might using the approaches mentioned in
this paper have improved relationships? Do you agree that
relationships can influence project quality and safety?
The Value of Strong Relationships in Construction
The relationships within the construction supply chain are invaluable for the success
of any project. Strong relationships foster better communication, collaboration, and
trust among all parties involved, leading to more efficient and higher-quality
outcomes. Poor relationships, on the other hand, can result in misunderstandings,
delays, and subpar work.
Reflecting on a past home renovation project, I experienced first-hand the negative
impact of poor relationships and broken communication. In this project, the
contractor often deviated from the agreed-upon blueprint without consulting me,
leading to significant delays and increased costs. Additionally, the lack of formal
agreements and proper communication channels meant that any changes or issues
were not promptly addressed, causing frustration and further setbacks. The poor
relationships and broken communication during this project caused several issues:
1. Misunderstandings and Mistakes: The lack of clear communication led to
misunderstandings about the project's scope and specifications. This resulted in
mistakes that needed to be corrected, wasting time and resources.
2. Delays and Cost Overruns: Unresolved issues and deviations from the plan caused
delays and increased costs. Without a clear process for escalating and resolving
problems, these issues compounded over time.
3. Reduced Quality: The overall quality of the work suffered due to the lack of
coordination and proper oversight. The contractor’s unilateral decisions often
compromised the project's quality standards.
Approaches to Improve Relationships and Communication
Using the approaches mentioned in the paper could have significantly improved
relationships and communication in the project. Here’s how:
1. Outlining Expected Performance and Testing Requirements: Clearly defining and
communicating performance expectations and testing requirements at the outset
would have ensured that everyone was on the same page. This could have prevented
deviations from the blueprint and ensured adherence to quality standards.
2. Highlighting Potential Challenges and Agreeing on an Escalation
Process: Identifying potential challenges beforehand and agreeing on an escalation
process would have provided a structured way to address issues as they arose. This
proactive approach could have mitigated delays and cost overruns by resolving
problems promptly.
3. Establishing a Chain of Communication: Setting up a clear chain of
communication and understanding how and when people expected to be informed
about changes would have improved coordination among all parties. Regular updates
and transparent communication could have built trust and prevented
misunderstandings.
4. Pre-Construction Meetings: Conducting comprehensive pre-construction meetings
with all key stakeholders—contractor’s representatives, principal subcontractors,
design engineers, consultants, utility agency representatives, municipal inspectors,
and other stakeholders—would have laid a solid foundation for the project. These
meetings would have facilitated:
 Reviewing Pre-Construction Planning and Timelines: Ensuring everyone was
aligned on the project timeline and planning details.
 Resolving Questions: Addressing any questions or concerns before construction
began.
 Exchanging Contact Information: Creating an emergency contact list and
establishing a direct line of communication among all parties.
Improving relationships throughout the construction supply chain is crucial for the
success of any project. I agree that relationships can significantly influence project
quality and safety. Strong relationships promote a culture of collaboration and
accountability, leading to higher quality work and adherence to safety standards.
Conversely, poor relationships can create a fragmented and disjointed work
environment, where quality and safety may be compromised by employing proactive
communication strategies, establishing clear expectations, and fostering a
collaborative environment, project managers can mitigate risks and enhance the
quality and safety of their projects. The approaches outlined in the paper provide a
solid framework for achieving these goals, emphasizing the importance of strong,
transparent relationships in the construction industry.

Pre-Project Planning - 7

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pre-Project Planning - 7

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pre-Project Planning - 7

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Concept 1

1. This paper makes mention of the need to improve relationships

You might also like