Unit 16
Unit 16
Unit 16
Structure
Objectives
Introduction
What is Drama and Its Kinds
16.2.1 What is a play?
16.2.2 Kinds of drama
Drama since the Renaissance: A Historical Perspective
16.3.1 Elizabethan and Jacobian Drama
16.3.2 Neo-classical Drama
16.3.3 Romantic Drama
16.3.4 Modern Drama
Themes
Characters
Plot and Structure
Speech and Imagery
Music and Stage Techniques: Sets, Costumes, Lights, Make-up etc.
Let Us Sum Up
Suggested Reading
Answers to Self-check Exercises
16.0 OBJECTIVES
The objective of this unit is to acquaint you with the history of Western Drama since
1500 and with the characteristics and elements of drama as a "!iteraryW form. After
reading this unit carefully, you should be able to:
trace the development of English and European Drama since 1500,
define elements of drama,
read, analyse and enjoy a play.
16.1 INTRODUCTION
In Block 3, we critically analysed Macbeth; and in the Units 12-15 of Block 4, we have
discussed A DONS Houe. In this unit, we shall at the outset define drama and its kinds.
Then we shall give you a brief history of Western drama since the Renaissance with
special emphasis on British drama. Subsequently we shall consider the major elements
of drama such as theme, character, plot, dialogue, imagery and symbol, music and
sound effects, scenery, properties, costume, light, make-up etc. We have also prepared
some exercises for you which you should complete before moving on to the next section.
able to have a full underitanding of these genres only after you have read about their Introduction to Dmmn
elements and studied the plays in the syllabus, here we provide you with a rough idea
of the basic distinctions and definitions.
A tragedy usually has an unhappy ending. It deals with a lofty action and has noble and
grand characters who speak in a dignified manner. They are shown in relation not only
to society but also the universe; they challenge destiny itself. The audience identifies
with the tragic protagonist and responds emotionally to his plight. As a contrast, a
comedy normally presents more trivial and commonplace action through characters
who are ordinary, average, even ridiculous and who use a pedestrian and familiar
manner of speech. A comedy shows an accentric or funny individual in relation to a
stable society from whose norm he has deviated. We remain detached or at a distance
from the characters and respond to them with our intellect rather than our feelings. We
laugh at the characters, incidents and situations on the stage instead of shedding tears
at their misfortune. The Tragi-comedy as practised by Shakespeare involved the mixing
of tragic scenes with comic scenes in the same play. Some of the scenes invited feelings
of pity and fear and identification with characters, used the grand style and created
solemn and moving situations. In contrast, other scenes had ridiculous events and
situations, dominated by funny characters and inducing us to laugh at them. What was
important was the separation of the comic scenes from the tragic ones and the inevitable
happy ending. In contrast, in a dark comedy, the same scene, in cases even the same
moment, is both comic and pathetic at the same time. The characters are objects of
neither pity and fear alone nor sympathy and ridicule exclusively. We are neither
involved nor detached. How do we respond to a man in Beckett's Waiting for Codot
who takes out his belt to hang himself and his trousers fall? The end is neither sad nor
happy but quite open: there-are neither deaths nor wedding bells but only a vague
incondusive end. Thus, given the variety and the spirit of experimentation in modern
drama, the traditional genres are being constantly modified and revised, and, in their
purer forms, they seem increasingly inadequate for the purpose of classification of
drama.
ii) How does the ending of a dark comedy differ from that of comedy or a tragedy?
A Doll's H u q : A Stud* Guide
iii) How d o you distinguish a conventional tragi-comedy from a modern dark comedy?
I by the audience. Artificial lights, sets, and properties were introduced on the stage, and
for the first time, women entered it as actresses. On this stage, Corneille and Racine,
its great tragic playwrights, dramatized in their contrasting manners the conflict
between honour or reason and passion as in the former's The Cid and the latter's
1 Phaedra. Rhymed Couplets -as also in the other contemporaries -furnished them
with the appropriate format to handle historical and mythical themes -in the grand
manner in Corneille and with subtle psychological insight in Racine. In contrast,
Moliere, the greai master of comedies depicted major characters.with specific
eccentricities- a miser, a hypoicrite, (Tartuffe),a misanthrope, (The Misanthrope) and
generated comedy out of their exposure. This was combined with socia~criticismand a
variety of comic devices including disguises, intrigues, farcical action -devices that
Dryden, Etherege, Wycherley and Congreve, employed so effectively in plays like The
Man of Mode, The Country Wife and The Way of the World for the Restoration stage
A Ddl's House: A Study Gulde 16.3.3 Romantic Drama.
During the eighteenth century, the neo-classical comedy of manners jostled w'ith the
more sentimental bourgeois comedy to evolve into the mellower and more genteel
comedy of Beaumarchais in France and Goldsmith and Sheridon in England. Whereas
England entered an arid phase in dramatic literature for about a hundred years,
Germany and France witnessed the triumph of Romanticism in the plays of Goethe and
Schiller, Hugo and Dumas. The German plays like Goethe's Goetz von Berlichingen,
Egmont and Fausr and Schiller's The Robbers, Mary Stuart, The Maid of Orleans and
William Tell celebrated the stroilg individual heroically opposing tryrannical authority,
sometime in total isolation. The romantic love of nature and opposition to the existing
systemsshine through many of these works. The worthwhile English Romantic plays -
Byron's Manfred and Cain and Shelley's The Cenci -similarly glorify rebellious
individuals. The Frenchmen, Hugo and Dumas, love to present spectacular actions by
superhuman characters in historical or exotic settings in plays like Cromwell, Three
Musketeers and The Count of Montechristo.
16.3.4 M o d e m Drama
Modem drama begins with Ibsen who himself had started as a writer of historical,
exuberant and romantic plays. His problem plays of the middle phase like A Doll's
House and Ghosts and the later dramas of symbolic and psychological realism such as
The wild Duck, Rosmersholm, Hedda Gabler and The Master Builder aim at
verisimilitude and photographic resemblance to reality, trying to reproduce its details
in an objective and authentic manner. Not only are the characters, events and dialogues
life like, even the symbols are "realistic" at the literal level. The exposition is carefully
manipulated, the sets and properties reproduce reality and the sources of light and
music are invariably explained in realistic terms. Chekhov, however, thought that
Ibsen's plays were too sensational and too carefully contrived10 appear natural. In his
major plays -The Sea-Gull, Three Sisters, Uncle Vanya and The Cherry Orchard -he
moved initially towards a drama of "indirect action" and later towards one of 1
"inaction". Not much happens as the characters drift instead of acting uigorously. The
dialogues are replaced by long monologues or characters talking at cross purposes.
Thus there is no proper communication -a fact also highlighted by the presence of
deaf servants q d meaningful pauses or moments of silence. Chekhov also spread his
action over several years or atleast several months, thus eliminating the unconvincing
packing of too many events in the short span of one or two days. Above all, he tried to
create a mood, an impression, an atmosphere on the stage.
Realism, however, appeared too constricting a form to the other giants of modern
drama who rebelled aga* it in separate ways. Thus the symbolistslike Maeterlinck in
their stylized, theatrical ways -unlike Chekhov's realistic mode -tried in plays like
The Intruder and Pelleas and Melisande to create an atmosphere on the stage through
lights, shadows, sound effects etc. often making us aware of the presence of the unseen
and the supernatural. Well before Claude1 and Yeats wrote symbolist-impressionist
plays in verse, Strindberg revolutionized the stage with his expressionistic-surrealistic
plays including To Damascus, The Dream Play and The Ghost Sonata. Although he
s t a r t e b la Zola in plays like The Father and Miss Julie, he soon turned to this highly
subjeckive mode of presenting the inner reality, mingling facts with fantasy, distorting
the objective, empirical reality. He and the fellow expressionists concentrated on the
lanuscape of the mind, externalising inner conflicts, dreams, reveries, hallucinations
are all shown directly to the audience. Time and space dissolve; flashbacks and sudden
shifts in time carry us back and forth. Sets are functional, not photographic; spptlights
are used imaginatively; and background music enhances the impact of the dialogues.
Symbolism is carried to an extreme, and not only sets and pmperties, but even
characters become symbols. After Strindberg and Hauptmann, Expressionism appears
in the work of Wedekihd, Kaiser and Toller in Germany, O'Casey in I~elandand
07Neill,Rice, Odets, Williams and Miller in America. Surrealism which resembles
Expressionism in its opposition to logic and its attention to the reality of the
subconscious mind in dreams, hallucinations and reveries appeared in the works of a
playwright like Jean Cocteau who in his version of Oedipus, The Infernal Machine
actually showed the terrible dreams that Jocasta has on her wedding night.
Two major playwrights stand apart from these tendencies -Bernard Shaw and -
Eirandello. Shaw, who wrote problem plays, discussing contemporary topics in a
strikingly witty comic mode e.g. Arms and the Man, Candida and Major Barbara,
turned to a dream sequence in Man and Superman, Chekhovian impressionism in
Heartbreak House and again a dream and a juxtaposition of the past and the present in
Saint Joan. Pirandello, often seen, as a practitioner of the "metatheatre" boldly
experiments with the relation between the stage and the audience and the conventions
of the theatre as he repeatedly explores the relation between illusion and reality, art
and life, mask and face, role and self and the fluid nature of human identity, selecting
the format of the play within the play in his best known works like Six Characters in
Search of an Author and Henry N.Many of these motifs furnish the core of the theatre
of the ~ b s u r d .
Although in the 1930s, 40s and 50s several playwrights'attempted plays in verse -
Garcia Lorca in Spain and T.S. Eliot and Christopher Fry in England -the two
dominant movements of the time were the Epic theatre and the Theatre of the Absurd.
The epic theatre was the brain child of Bertolt Brecht who created a "Scientific" theatre
that would inspire the audience to bring about a change in socio-economic and political
situation. He employed a variety of devices to create "verfremdungseffekt" -audience
alienation or distantiation -on the stage. Narration, prior announcement of the
contents of a scene that is enacted, taking up a known story, music that is out of
harmony with the dialogue, distancing the play in space and time aim to distance the
audience emolionally from the character, and encourage it to weigh the issues carefully
and contemplate how the problem dramatized on the stage can be solved by altering the
social, political, economic system. However, his finest works --Mother courage, The
Good Woman of Setzuan Galileo and The Caucasian Chalk Circle -showed a fine
tension between the attempt to implement the new theory and the uncons~ious
allegiance to the Aristotelean conventions. Later, some English playwrights like John
Whiting, Robert Bolt, John Osborne, John Arden and Brendan Behan combined
elements of the Epic theatre with other conventions in plays like The Devils, A Man for
All Seasons, Serjeant ~\fusgrave'sDance, The Entertainer and The Hostage.
The Theatre of the Absurd had a truly varied lineage, ranging from the plays of
Chekhov, Strindberg and Pirandello to the philosophies of Sartre and Camus. Like
Sartre and Camus, they postulated a Godless, meaningless universe, denounced all
absolute values and presented isolated characters who could not coinmunicate with
each other. However, whereas Sartre and Camus, clothe their vision in the
"Conventional" dramatic modes, the absurdists like Ionesco, Beckett and Adamoff
forged a new dramatic form to harmonize with their bizarre view of reality. Pinter and
Stoppard in England and Albee in America followed their techniques even as they
modified certain features of the mode. In their major works - The Bald Soprano,
Rhinoceros, Waiting for Godot, Endgame, Professor Taranne - the Absurdists
dispense with plot, strip their characters of their backgrounds, refuse to explain their
motivations and mingle fantasy with observationto show unbelievable and bizarre
incidents that reveal the absence of a Divine order or a moral universe or any kind of a
logical system in the world. The characters have fluid or multiple identities and they are
unable to reach out to other characters across the barrier of isolation. The failure to
communicate is manifested in two ways -the characters have nothing to communicate
and language is an inadequate medium of communication. Often more is conveyed
through silences than through dialogues. Extensive use of cliches and meaningless
words even leads to the breakdown of language as in Ionesco's The Bald Soprano. The
settings are often outside specific locales and thus attain universal dimensions, dealing
with the human condition which cannot be altered through sociafor political or
economic reforms.
Jean Genet, who is frequently classified as an Absurdist, also provides the links with
the Theatre of cruelty, which was conceived and developed by Artaud, before the
former took to it. Genet's Pirandellian concern with the themes of illusion and reality,
art and life, mask and face, role and self and the motifs of fluid identity and role playing
and the device of the play within the play are mixed with an almost morbid interest in
violence, sadism and masochism of various kinds-with "Cruelty" as Artaud meant it.
No playwright of the stature of Shaw or'Pirandello or Brecht has appeared during the
recent decades but it is too early to say tharthe springs of the theatre have dried up in
this age of theTelevision.
A 1)oll's ltnusr: A Stud? Guide
THEMES
A play has a'major theme or related themes. In the process of conveying the moral
vision of the author, it says something about human beings, their society and the world
and makes statements of an ethical or philosophical kind. Thus among the plays you
have read, Macbeth deals with the issues of power, crime and guilt, loyalty, evil and so
on. A Doll's ~ o u s ise concerned with the family as an institution, the position of
women and the need to tell the truth, no matter what the consequences are. Arms and
the Man explores the nature of love, war and snobbery. Tendulkar in Ghasi Ram
Kotwal attacks conventional social morality and hypocrisy. You will also notice that in
a great play, the themes are not single but multiple, though usually carefully
interconnected. A propagandist may use the vehicle of drama to convey a clear and
simple message and judgement but plays of the highest excellence embody complex and
multifaceted views of the mo~alissues concerned.
16.5 CHARACTERS
Any drama requires human characters, but their conceptions may vary tangibly from
one mode to another or one period to another. In a tragedy, the central characters are
well rounded figures-whopossess psychologicaldepth and are capable of surprising us.
In contrast the conventional comic characters are flat or twodinensional. Their actions
and behaviours can be predicted, and sometimes they fall into well-known types. Thus
in Ben Jonson's comedy of humours, they derive their vibrancy and animation from the
humours. In Restoration comedies, there i r e fops, gulls and other set types. Moliere
has a misanthrope or a miser or a hypocrite or a playboy as the main character whose
eccentricitybecomes the source of the action, Again, a dramatic character may develop
or may simply remain static. m u s Ibsen's Nora matures and acquires a new outlook on
life, but Shakespeare's Falstaff and Shaw's Nicola do not change. In many plays, masks
are used to freeze the characters and make them static to an extent. In all plays,
characters are revealed through their actions but often they are also shown through
their comments on themselves and each other and especially in the modem period
through the playwright's direct analysis of them. As a matter of fact, even costumes,
gestures, postures, movements and dialogues depict characters.
SdfCBcdrExercise2
Hint: To answer questions i and ii, please refer Blocks 3 , 4 , 5 and 6.
Hint: To answer questions iii, iv and v, please refer section 16.3.