Omega 3 e ELA
Omega 3 e ELA
Omega 3 e ELA
1
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine; 2 Physiology Research Center; and 3 Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in
Metabolic Diseases, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, I.R. Iran; and 4 Pure North S’Energy Foundation, Calgary, Alberta,
Canada
Abstract
Background: Combined omega-3 fatty acid and vitamin D supplementation may improve multiple sclerosis (MS) by
correcting metabolic abnormalities and attenuating oxidative stress and inflammation.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the effects of ω-3 fatty acid and vitamin D cosupplementation on the disability
score and metabolic status of patients with MS.
Methods: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score
and inflammation as primary outcomes and oxidative stress biomarkers and metabolic profile as secondary outcomes.
Patients, aged 18–55 y, were matched for disease EDSS scores, gender, medications, BMI, and age (n = 53) and
randomly received a combined 2 × 1000 mg/d ω-3 fatty acid and 50,000 IU/biweekly cholecalciferol supplement or
placebo for 12 wk. The placebos were matched in colour, shape, size, packaging, smell, and taste with supplements.
Fasting blood samples were collected at baseline and end of intervention to measure different outcomes. Multiple linear
regression models were used to assess treatment effects on outcomes adjusting for confounding variables.
Results: Patients taking ω-3 fatty acid plus vitamin D supplements showed a significant improvement in EDSS
(β −0.18; 95% CI: −0.33, −0.04; P = 0.01), compared with placebo. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein
(β −1.70 mg/L; 95% CI: −2.49, −0.90 mg/L; P < 0.001), plasma total antioxidant capacity (β +55.4 mmol/L; 95%
CI: 9.2, 101.6 mmol/L; P = 0.02), total glutathione (β +51.14 µmol/L; 95% CI: 14.42, 87.87 µmol/L; P = 0.007), and
malondialdehyde concentrations (β −0.86 µmol/L; 95% CI: −1.10, −0.63 µmol/L; P < 0.001) were significantly improved
in the supplemented group compared with the placebo group. In addition, ω-3 fatty acid and vitamin D cosupplementation
resulted in a significant reduction in serum insulin, insulin resistance, and total/HDL-cholesterol, and a significant increase
in insulin sensitivity and serum HDL-cholesterol concentrations.
Conclusion: Overall, taking ω-3 fatty acid and vitamin D supplements for 12 wk by patients with MS had beneficial
effects on EDSS and metabolic status. This trial was registered at the Iranian website (www.irct.ir) for registration of
clinical trials as IRCT2017090133941N20. J Nutr 2018;148:1–7.
Keywords: ω-3 fatty acid, vitamin D, multiple sclerosis, disability, inflammation, oxidative stress
2 Kouchaki et al.
Enrollment
were assessed as follows: plasma NO through the use of the Giess criteria (n = 8)
method (19), total antioxidant capacity (TAC) via the ferric reduction
antioxidant power method developed by Benzie and Strain (20),
glutathione (GSH) applying the Beutler et al. method (21), and
malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations by means of the thiobarbituric
acid reactive substance method (22) with the inter- and intra-assay Randomly assigned (n = 60)
CVs <5%. To measure fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and serum lipid
profiles (total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, VLDL-
cholesterol, and TGs), the study utilized the most commonly used
kits (Pars Azmun, Tehran, Iran). CVs for FPG, total cholesterol,
HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, VLDL-cholesterol, and TGs were
1.7%, 1.6%, 1.8%, 1.9%, 2.1%, and 1.8%, respectively. Circulating
Allocation
concentrations of serum insulin were assessed through the use of an Allocated to placebo Allocated to intervention
ELISA kit (Monobind, Lake Forest, CA) with the intra- and interassay (n = 30) (n = 30)
CVs <5%. The HOMA-IR and the quantitative insulin sensitivity check
index (QUICKI) were calculated according to previously established
formulas (23).
Lost to follow-up due to Lost to follow-up due to
moving to another city (n = 2) moving to another city (n = 2)
Follow-up
Statistical methods and not interested to be in and not interested to be in
research (n = 1) research (n = 2)
Anthropometric measures and nutrient intake were compared between
intervention groups, via independent-samples t test. Multiple linear
regression models were used to assess treatment effects on the study
outcomes after adjusting for confounding variables including the
baseline values, age, and BMI. The effect sizes were presented as the
mean differences with 95% CIs. The normality of the model residual
Analysis
Analyzed (n = 27) Analyzed (n = 26)
was tested through the use of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov one-sample
test. Outcome log-transformation was applied if the model residual did
not have a normal distribution (QUICKI, TGs, and VLDL-cholesterol).
Bootstrapping was also used as a sensitivity analysis for CIs and inverse
probability weighting was used to explain loss-to-follow-up, but the FIGURE 1 Summary of patient flow.
results did not change substantially. A P value of <0.05 was considered
as statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted via
the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18 (SPSS Inc., and MDA (β −0.86 µmol/L; 95% CI: −1.10, −0.63 µmol/L;
Chicago, IL). P < 0.001) improved significantly in the supplemented group,
compared with the placebo group. In addition, ω-3 fatty acid
and vitamin D3 combination resulted in a significant reduction
in serum insulin (β −2.33 μIU/mL; 95% CI: −4.03, −0.63
Results μIU/mL; P = 0.008), HOMA-IR (β −0.46; 95% CI: −0.83,
At the end of the intervention, 53 patients [treatment (n = 26) −0.08; P = 0.01), and total/HDL-cholesterol (β −0.43; 95%
and placebo (n = 27)] completed the trial (Figure 1). Four CI: −0.85, −0.006; P = 0.04), and a significant increase in
patients in the treatment group and 3 in the placebo group QUICKI (β +0.01; 95% CI: 0.003, 0.02; P = 0.008) and
were excluded from final analyses due to moving to another serum HDL-cholesterol concentrations (β +2.30 mg/dL; 95%
city (n = 4) or loss of interest for participation in the research CI: 0.59, 4.00 mg/dL; P = 0.009) compared with the placebo.
(n = 3). Overall, the compliance rate in this study was high, Other biomarkers of oxidative stress, FPG, and other lipids did
such that >90% of capsules were consumed throughout the
study in both groups. No side effects were reported after
coadministration of ω-3 fatty acid and vitamin D3 capsules in TABLE 1 General characteristics of study patients1
MS patients throughout the study.
Placebo group ω-3 fatty acid plus vitamin
Mean age, height, weight, and BMI at baseline and end-of-
(n = 27) D3 group (n = 26) P2
trial were not significantly different between the intervention
groups (Table 1). Age, y 35.2 ± 9.2 33.3 ± 6.5 0.37
Mean dietary macro- and micronutrient intakes were also Height, cm 161.6 ± 6.4 163.2 ± 8.5 0.41
not significantly different between the 2 groups throughout the Body weight, kg
trial (Table 2). Baseline 65.1 ± 9.9 66.8 ± 11.1 0.53
Our findings showed that the coadministration of ω-3 fatty Wk 12 65.0 ± 10.0 66.8 ± 11.1 0.50
acid and vitamin D3 , for 12 wk, significantly decreased EDSS Change −0.1 ± 0.7 0.1 ± 0.4 0.32
score [β (difference in the mean outcome measures between BMI, kg/m2
treatment groups) −0.18; 95% CI: −0.33, −0.04; P = 0.01] in Baseline 24.9 ± 3.3 25.1 ± 3.9 0.83
patients with MS (Table 3). Moreover, serum hs-CRP (β −1.70 Wk 12 24.8 ± 3.4 25.1 ± 3.9 0.78
mg/L; 95% CI: −2.49, −0.90 mg/L; P < 0.001), plasma TAC Change −0.1 ± 0.3 0.03 ± 0.1 0.26
(β +55.4 mmol/L; 95% CI: 9.2, 101.6 mmol/L; P = 0.02), GSH 1
Data are means ± SDs.
(β +51.14 µmol/L; 95% CI: 14.42, 87.87 µmol/L; P = 0.007), 2
Obtained from independent t test.
ω-3 fatty acid plus vitamin D3 Difference in outcome measures between ω-3 fatty
Placebo group (n = 27) group (n = 26) acid plus vitamin D3 and placebo treatment groups2
Variables Baseline Wk 12 Baseline Wk 12 β (95% CI) P3
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, ng/mL 12.7 ± 2.8 13.0 ± 3.0 14.0 ± 3.1 25.2 ± 7.7 12.53 (10.49, 14.56) <0.001
EDSS 2.4 ± 0.9 2.5 ± 0.9 2.3 ± 0.6 2.2 ± 0.5 −0.18 (−0.33, −0.04) 0.01
Serum hs-CRP, mg/L 3.9 ± 2.4 4.2 ± 2.5 3.7 ± 2.0 2.6 ± 2.3 −1.70 (−2.49, −0.90) <0.001
Plasma NO, μmol/L 36.0 ± 4.0 35.2 ± 4.8 34.2 ± 3.7 34.2 ± 3.9 0.41 (−1.38, 2.21) 0.64
Plasma TAC, mol/L 1.0 ± 0.1 1.0 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 55.4 (9.2, 101.6) 0.02
Plasma GSH, µmol/L 702 ± 119 698 ± 91 751 ± 89 782 ± 108 51.14 (14.42, 87.87) 0.007
Plasma MDA, µmol/L 2.8 ± 0.5 2.9 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.6 2.3 ± 0.5 −0.86 (−1.10, −0.63) <0.001
FPG, mg/dL 89.0 ± 8.6 90.4 ± 8.9 90.6 ± 10.3 88.9 ± 9.8 −2.28 (−5.34, 0.78) 0.14
Serum insulin, μIU/mL 12.7 ± 3.9 13.2 ± 3.8 13.4 ± 3.4 11.4 ± 3.9 −2.33 (−4.03, −0.63) 0.008
HOMA-IR 2.8 ± 0.9 2.9 ± 0.9 3.0 ± 1.0 2.5 ± 1.0 −0.46 (−0.83, −0.08) 0.01
QUICKI 0.33 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.01 0.32 ± 0.01 0.33 ± 0.02 0.01 (0.003, 0.02) 0.008
Serum TGs, mg/dL 133 ± 61 136 ± 58 126 ± 69 128 ± 62 −1.70 (−13.65, 10.25) 0.78
Serum VLDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 26.7 ± 12.2 27.3 ± 11.5 25.2 ± 13.7 25.6 ± 12.4 −0.34 (−2.73, 2.05) 0.78
Serum total cholesterol, mg/dL 155 ± 32 162 ± 31 159 ± 41 165 ± 40 −1.77 (−10.93, 7.39) 0.94
Serum LDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 85.0 ± 38.2 90.7 ± 37.0 89.5 ± 33.9 92.5 ± 32.3 −3.96 (−11.48, 3.55) 0.29
Serum HDL-cholesterol, mg/dL 43.3 ± 6.8 44.1 ± 6.8 44.0 ± 6.9 46.6 ± 6.6 2.30 (0.59, 4.00) 0.009
Total/HDL-cholesterol 3.7 ± 0.9 3.8 ± 0.9 3.7 ± 1.0 3.6 ± 0.9 −0.43 (−0.85, −0.006) 0.04
1
Data are means ± SDs. EDSS, expanded disability status scale; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; GSH, total glutathione; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; MDA,
malondialdehyde; NO, nitric oxide; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; TAC, total antioxidant capacity.
2
“Outcome measures” refers to the change in values of measures of interest between baseline and wk 12. β, difference in the mean outcome measures between treatment
groups; ω-3 fatty acid plus vitamin D3 group = 1 and placebo group = 0.
3
Obtained from multiple regression model (adjusted for baseline values of each biochemical variable, age, and baseline BMI).
6 Kouchaki et al.