IFRS Changes 2024
IFRS Changes 2024
IFRS Changes 2024
to International Financial
Reporting Standards
A briefing for preparers of IFRS financial statements
2024 Edition
Important Disclaimer:
This document has been developed as an information resource. It is intended as a guide only and the application of its contents to specific situations will depend on the particular
circumstances involved. While every care has been taken in its presentation, personnel who use this document to assist in evaluating compliance with International Financial Reporting
Standards should have sufficient training and experience to do so. No person should act specifically on the basis of the material contained herein without considering and taking professional
advice. Neither Grant Thornton International Ltd, nor any of its personnel nor any of its member firms or their partners or employees, accept any responsibility for any errors it might
contain, whether caused by negligence or otherwise, or any loss, howsoever caused, incurred by any person as a result of utilising or otherwise placing any reliance upon this document.
SectionPage
Introduction03
What’s new in the 2024 edition Where a change has been made but an entity is yet to
The 2024 edition of the publication has been updated for apply it, certain disclosures are required to be made under
changes to International Financial Reporting Standards IAS 8 ‘Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates
(IFRS) that were published between 1 January 2023 and and Errors’. Disclosures required include the fact that the new
31 December 2023. or amended Standard or Interpretation has been issued but it
has not yet been applied, and known or reasonably estimable
The publication now covers 31 March 2023, 30 June 2023, information relevant to assessing its possible impact on the
30 September 2023, 31 December 2023 and 31 March 2024 financial statements in the period of initial application.
financial year ends.
Identifying the commercial significance of the changes in
Contents the publication
The effective dates table on the next page lists all the changes For each change covered in the publication, we have included
covered in the publication and their effective dates. a box on its commercial implications. These sections focus on
two questions:
How to use the publication
Identifying the changes that will affect you • how many entities will be affected?
The effective dates table has been colour coded to help entities • what will be the impact on affected entities?
planning for a specific financial reporting year end, and
A traffic light system indicates our assessment of the answers
identifies:
to these questions.
• changes mandatorily effective for the first time
• changes not yet effective Other Grant Thornton International publications
• changes already in effect. Where appropriate, references have been made to other
Grant Thornton International publications that provide more
Where a change is not yet mandatorily effective for a detailed information on the changes discussed in this publication.
particular year end, it may still be possible for an entity to A list of other publications is provided on pages 26 to 29 and
adopt it early (depending on local legislation and the ability should you require further assistance, please get in touch with
to be able to fully comply with all the requirements). the IFRS contact in your local Grant Thornton office.
Early
Application?
31 Mar 2023
year end
30 Jun 2023
year end
30 Sep 2023
year end
31 Dec 2023
year end
31 Mar 2024
year end
reporting
periods beginning
on or after
mandatory effect
mandatory effect
Effective for the
Already in
Already in
first time
first time
first time
Onerous Contracts – Cost of Fulfilling a Contract
IAS 37 1January 2022 ✓
(Amendments to IAS 37)
Publications issued
IFRS 3 ‘Business References to the Conceptual Adds a new exception to the recognition principle in order to make sure that the
Combinations’ Framework accounting remains unchanged.
Prohibits an entity from deducting from the cost of property, plant and
IAS 16 ‘Property, Plant equipment amounts received from selling items produced while the entity is
Proceeds before Intended Use
and Equipment’ preparing the asset for its intended use. Instead, an entity will recognise such
sales proceeds and related cost in profit or loss.
IAS 37 ‘Provisions,
Onerous Contracts – Cost of pecifies which costs an entity includes when assessing whether a contract
S
Contingent Liabilities
Fulfilling a Contract will be loss-making.
and Contingent Assets’
IFRS 1 ‘First time Adoption Simplifies the application of IFRS 1 by a subsidiary that becomes a first-
Subsidiary as a First-time
of International Financial time adopter after its parent in relation to the measurement of cumulative
Adopter
Reporting Standards’ translation differences.
Fees in the ‘10 per cent’ Test Clarifies the fees an entity should include when assessing whether the terms of
IFRS 9 ‘Financial
for Derecognition of Financial a new or modified financial liability are substantially different from the terms
Instruments’
Liabilities of the original financial liability.
Illustrative Examples
Accompanying IFRS 16 Lease Incentives Removes potential for confusion regarding lease incentives.
‘Leases’
Commercial significance
Few
Number of
entities affected
Low
Impact on
affected entities
In May 2017, after more than 20 years in development, the This definition is similar to that in IFRS 4. In addition, IFRS 17
IASB published IFRS 17 ‘Insurance Contracts’. This lengthy provides guidance on how to assess the significance of
completion period reflects a number of factors including: insurance risk based on the possibility of a loss on a present
• very diverse local practices for insurance accounting value basis (rather than nominal), and how to evaluate
• a huge range of jurisdiction-specific products, tax changes in the level of insurance risk.
implications and regulations that had to be captured by
Measurement
a uniform measurement model
IFRS 17 requires an entity that issues insurance contracts
• the need for alignment with other Standards that have been
to report them on the statement of financial position as the
recently published by the IASB, such as IFRS 9 and IFRS 15
total of:
‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’, and to some
degree the work of other standard setters. • the fulfilment cash flows – the current estimates of amounts
that the insurer expects to collect from premiums and
The new Standard replaces IFRS 4 ‘Insurance Contracts’ which pay out for claims, benefits and expenses, including an
was published in 2004. IFRS 4 was designed to be an interim adjustment for the timing and risk of those cash flows, and
Standard and therefore allowed entities issuing insurance • the contractual service margin – the expected profit for
contracts to carry on accounting for them using policies that providing future insurance coverage (ie unearned profit).
had been developed under their previous local accounting
standards. This meant that entities continued to use a multitude The measurement of the fulfilment cash flows reflects the
of different approaches for accounting for insurance contracts, current value of any interest rate guarantees and financial
making it difficult to compare and contrast the financial options included in the insurance contracts.
performance of otherwise similar entities.
To better reflect changes in insurance obligations and risks,
IFRS 17 solves the comparison problems created by IFRS 4 IFRS 17 requires an entity to update the fulfilment cash flows at
by requiring all insurance contracts to be accounted for in a each reporting date, using current estimates that are consistent
consistent manner, benefiting both investors and insurance with relevant market information. This means that insurance
companies. We briefly discuss some of the areas covered by obligations will be accounted for using current values instead
the new Standard below: of historical cost, ending the practice of using data from when
a policy was taken out.
Scope
IFRS 17 applies to all insurance contracts that an entity Current discount rates are also required to be used. These
issues (including those for reinsurance); reinsurance contracts will reflect the characteristics of the cash flows arising from
it holds; and investment contracts with a discretionary the insurance contract liabilities, a change from the previous
participation feature, provided the entity also issues insurance situation where many entities used discount rates based on
contracts. It is not an industry specific standard. It applies to the expected return on assets backing the insurance contract
any reporting entity that issues insurance contracts, so great liabilities.
care is needed to ensure the requirements set out in IFRS 17
Revenue is no longer equal to written premiums but to the
are not overlooked.
change in any contract liability covered by consideration
IFRS 17 defines an insurance contract as one under which during the reporting period.
one party (the issuer) accepts significant insurance risk from
another party (the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate
the policyholder if a specified uncertain future event (the
insured event) adversely affects the policyholder.
The IASB also established a Transition Resource Group which Non-insurers therefore need to be alert to the possibility that
considered questions from stakeholders about the new contracts they have issued (or may issue in the future) might
accounting requirements. Further details about what that now fall within the scope of the new Standard. This may result
group considered can be found on the IASB website. in significant changes to the accounting.
T he amendments defer the effective date of IFRS 17 by two years from annual
reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2021 to annual reporting
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023. The amendments also extend
Effective date of IFRS 17 and the IFRS 9 temporary exemption
the temporary exemption (included in IFRS 4) from IFRS 9 by two years so that
an entity applying the exemption would be required to apply IFRS 9 for annual
reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2023.
The amendments add additional scope exclusions for credit card contracts
Scope exclusions that provide insurance coverage, and also an optional scope exclusion for loan
contracts that transfer high insurance risk.
The amendments add extra transitional reliefs for business combinations, the
Transitional modifications and reliefs date of application of the risk mitigation option and the use of the fair value
transition approach.
The amendments add minor changes where the drafting of the Standard did
Minor amendments
not achieve the IASB’s intended outcome.
Extension of the temporary exemption from applying IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’ have different
IFRS 9 to IFRS 4 transition requirements. For some insurers, these differences
In 2020, the IASB also issued further amendments to the can cause temporary accounting mismatches between
existing insurance Standard IFRS 4, ‘Extension of the Temporary financial assets and insurance contract liabilities in the
Exemption from Applying IFRS 9 (Amendments to IFRS 4)’ comparative information they present in their financial
so that entities can still apply IFRS 9 alongside IFRS 17 until statements when applying IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 for the first time.
1 January 2023.
The amendment will help insurers to avoid these temporary
Initial Application of IFRS 17 and IFRS 9 – Comparative accounting mismatches and, therefore, will improve the
Information (Amendment to IFRS 17) usefulness of comparative information for investors. It will do
During 2021, the IASB then issued another narrow-scope this by providing insurers with an option for the presentation
amendment to IFRS 17 which is applicable on transition to of comparative information about financial assets.
the new Standard. However, it does not impact any other
requirements of IFRS 17.
Some
Number of
17 – Impact on non-insurance entities’.
entities affected
equally to insurance contracts issued by insurance and non-insurance entities.
first time. To obtain your copy, please get IFRS 17 is a Standard about insurance contracts, not
in touch with the IFRS contact in your local Grant Thornton a Standard for the insurance industry. While insurance
office or go to https://www.grantthornton.global/en/ companies will be most affected, its effect will also be felt
insights/articles/ifrs-17-insights/insights-into-ifrs-17/ beyond the entities authorised to carry out regulated
insurance activities in a jurisdiction.
High
Impact on
affected entities
The amendments
Many
Number of
In specific circumstances, entities are exempt from recognising
deferred tax when they recognise assets or liabilities for the first
entities affected
time. There had been some diversity in practice as to whether
the exemption applied to transactions such as leases and
decommissioning obligations. These are transactions where The amendments affect all entities with leases accounted for
entities recognise both an asset and a liability. under IFRS 16.
The amendments
Many
Number of
The amendments include a definition of ‘accounting estimates’
as well as other amendments to IAS 8 that will help entities
entities affected
distinguish changes in accounting policies from changes in
accounting estimates.
The amendments affect all entities that could potentially
This distinction between these two types of changes is have a change in accounting estimate or change in
important as changes in accounting policies are normally accounting policy.
applied retrospectively to past transactions and events,
whereas changes in accounting estimates are applied
prospectively to future transactions and events.
The amendments
Many
Number of
The amendments to IAS 1 require reporting entities to disclose
their material accounting policy information rather than their
entities affected
significant accounting policies. The amendments to IFRS
Practice Statement 2 provide guidance on how to apply the
concept of materiality to accounting policy disclosures. The amendments affect all reporting entities when disclosing
their accounting policies.
These amendments were issued as a result of feedback
received indicating that reporting entities needed more
guidance when determining what accounting policy
information should be disclosed.
Medium
Impact on
The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods affected entities
beginning on or after 1 January 2023. Earlier application
is permitted.
These amendments impact what accounting policies are
disclosed which could affect investors’ decisions.
The OECD published its Pillar Two Model Rules in December Commercial significance
2021 to ensure that large multinational companies (ie groups
with revenue of EUR750 million or more in two of the last four
years) would be subject to a minimum 15% tax rate. The
reform is expected to apply in most jurisdictions for accounting Some
Number of
periods starting on or after 1 January 2024. entities affected
However, while the reaction from jurisdictions around the world
to implement the changes has been positive, there have been
major stakeholder concerns about the uncertainty over the The Pillar Two Rules only apply to large multinational
accounting for deferred taxes arising from the implementation companies which operate in low-tax jurisdictions.
of these rules. Therefore, the IASB has acted quickly to address
these concerns and provide direction on what they expect
entities to disclose.
Medium
Impact on
The amendments
The amendments: affected entities
• provide a temporary recognition exception to accounting
for deferred taxes arising from the implementation of the
international tax reform (Pillar Two Model Rules). The aim of The amendments will provide a significant saving to reporting
this exception is to provide some consistency in applying entities in terms of the time, cost and effort that will be required
IAS 12 when preparing financial statements as the rules are to assess the accounting implications associated with the tax
phased in. consequences arising from the implementation of the Pillar Two
• additional disclosure requirements – these are targeted at Model Rules.
a reporting entity’s exposure to income taxes arising from
the OECD reforms in periods in which the Pillar Two Model
legislation is enacted or substantively enacted but not yet
in effect. The aim of these disclosures is to help investors
with their understanding of the reporting entity’s exposure to
these tax reforms, particularly before any domestic offshore
legislation takes effect. The amendments provide guidance
on how this information could be disclosed to meet the
above objective.
The IASB therefore issued amendments to IAS 1 to clarify its Commercial significance
previously issued guidance and rectify the above issue.
The amendments
The amendments elaborate on guidance set out in IAS 1 by:
Many
Number of
• clarifying that the classification of a liability as either
current or non-current is based on the entity’s rights at the
entities affected
end of the reporting period
• stating that management’s expectations around whether
The amendments affect entities with borrowing arrangements
they will defer settlement or not does not impact the
so therefore the impact could be widespread.
classification of the liability
• adding guidance about lending conditions and how these
can impact classification
• including requirements for liabilities that can be settled
using an entity’s own instruments. Medium
Impact on
affected entities
The amendments
The amendments set out in ‘Non-current Liabilities with
Covenants (Amendments to IAS 1)’ state that at the reporting
Medium
Impact on
date, the entity does not consider covenants that will need
to be complied with in the future, when considering the affected entities
classification of the debt as current or non-current. Instead,
the entity should disclose information about these covenants
in the notes to the financial statements. These amendments could have a significant impact on an
entity’s presentation of their borrowings which in turn could
The IASB wants these amendments to enable investors to impact important financial ratios.
understand the risk that such debt could become repayable
early and therefore improving the information being provided
on the long-term debt.
The amendments
Some
Number of
The IASB has now issued additional guidance in IFRS 16 on
accounting for sale and leaseback transactions. Previously
entities affected
IFRS 16 only included guidance on how to account for sale
and leaseback transactions at the date of the transaction
itself. However, the Standard did not specify any subsequent The amendments affect entities accounting for a sale and
accounting when reporting on the sale and lease back leaseback transaction.
transaction after that date.
‘In May 2023, the IASB amended IAS 7 ‘Cash flow Statements’
and IFRS 7 ‘Financial Instruments: Disclosures’ through the
increase of disclosure requirements to enhance the transparency
of supplier finance arrangements and their effects on an entity’s
liabilities, cash flows and exposure to liquidity risk.’
The amendments
The amendments include both updates to guidance to assist These amendments only affect entities that are required to
preparers in correctly accounting for foreign currency items report foreign currency transactions where there is a long-term
and increases the level of disclosure required to help users lack of exchangeability between currencies.
understand the impact of a lack of exchangeability on the
financial statements. The amendments:
• introduce a definition of whether a currency is
exchangeable, and the process by which an entity should Medium
Impact on
assess this exchangeability. This includes application affected entities
guidance included in a new Appendix A
• provide guidance on how an entity should estimate a
spot exchange rate in cases where a currency is not
Affected entities may be required to adjust the carrying
exchangeable
value of any monetary items that have been translated from
• require additional disclosures in cases where an entity
a foreign currency which is not exchangeable, and will be
has estimated a spot exchange rate due to a lack of
required to provide additional disclosures on how the new spot
exchangeability, including the nature and financial impact
rate has been determined.
of the lack of exchangeability, and details of the spot
exchange rate used and the estimation process.
‘In August 2023, the IASB amended IAS 21 ‘The Effects of Changes
in Foreign Exchange Rates’ to clarify the approach that should
be taken by preparers of financial statements.’
As well as the publications mentioned within the body of this publication, we also have a number of other publications including:
Reporting under IFRS – Example Interim Consolidated Reporting under IFRS – Example Consolidated Financial
Financial Statements 2023 Statements 2023
This publication illustrates the interim A set of illustrative consolidated financial IFRS
This publication aims to assist management reflect uncertainty in accounting for income Tax
on control and consolidation as well as and some practical guidance for when
result of this, but the Interpretation remains applicable and certain disclosures may
Overview
February 2017
identifying and addressing the key practical applying it. You can access this publication
Preparers are expected to apply the tax rules in good faith. For each individual tax treatment identified, the process
This Interpretation expands on this principle and requires an is relatively simple, but first it is important to understand
entity to record a liability where it is considered probable that its scope.
an uncertain tax treatment that affects the determination
of taxable income, tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax • What income taxes does IFRIC 23 apply to?
credits and tax rates, would not be resolved in favour of the • What is a tax treatment?
entity if it were to be reviewed by a taxation authority. • What is meant by uncertainty?
• What is a taxation authority?
Advisory Tax
applying this Standard from the perspective The key areas covered in the series are:
Fair Value Measurement Understanding the discount rate
Under IFRS 16 ‘Leases’, discount rates are used to determine A lessee will need to determine a discount rate for virtually
the present value of the lease payments used to measure every lease to which it applies the lessee accounting model
a lessee’s lease liability. Discount rates are also used to in IFRS 16. However, a discount rate may not need to be
determine lease classification for a lessor and to measure a determined for a lease if:
lessor’s net investment in a lease. • a lessee applies the recognition exemption for either a short-
• Interim periods
security and the economic environment in which the transaction
as ‘the rate of interest that causes the present value of (a)
occurs.
the lease payments and (b) the unguaranteed residual value
to equal the sum of (i) the fair value of the underlying asset
and (ii) any initial direct costs of the lessor.’
www.grantthornton.global/en/insights/
pay to borrow over a similar term, and with a similar security,
• Definition of a lease
the funds necessary to obtain an asset of a similar value to
the right-of-use asset in a similar economic environment’.
Advisory
those charged with the governance ‘Insights into IFRS 2’ series sets out the
Overview of the Standard What is IFRS 2?
IAS 36 ‘Impairment of Assets’ is not a new Standard, and while many of its IFRS 2 ‘Share-based Payment’ was introduced in 2004 and the accounting principles
requirements are familiar, an impairment review of assets (either tangible or have remained largely unchanged since. Our ‘Insights into IFRS 2’ series is aimed at
intangible) is frequently challenging to apply in practice. This is because demystifying the Standard by explaining the fundamentals of accounting for share-
IAS 36’s guidance is detailed, prescriptive and complex in some areas. based payments using relatively simple language and providing insights to help
requirements set out in IAS 36, and Standard. The key topics covered are:
requirements. • how to recognise and reverse an impairment loss The accounting of share-based payments is an area that remains not well understood and this is evidenced by a number of
• when and under what circumstances an entity must reverse Interpretations and agenda decisions being issued by the IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC). Considerable care needs to be
Objective of IAS 36 an impairment loss, and applied in evaluating the requirements set out in IFRS 2 and other authoritative guidance to increasingly complex and innovative
The objective of IAS 36 is to outline the procedures an entity • the detailed disclosure requirements (both in the case of share-based payment arrangements.
should apply to ensure the carrying values of all its assets are impairment and also in the absence of impairment).
not stated above their recoverable amounts (the amounts to be
recovered through use or sale of the assets). To accomplish this
objective, IAS 36 provides guidance on:
• What is IFRS 2?
asset level, cash-generating units (CGU) level or groups
of CGUs)
Why use share-based payments
• if and when a quantitative impairment test is required,
including the indicator-based approach for an individual One of the most persuasive reasons is that share-based are unable to raise traditional debt funding and therefore
asset that is not goodwill, an indefinite life intangible asset
payments allow entities to better align the interests of their might pay their employees and suppliers using share-based
or intangible asset not yet ready for use
employees with those of the shareholders. By remunerating payment arrangements. In fact, it is often the only viable
employees using shares, share options and other equity payment method available to such entities.
Advisory Advisory
certain problematic areas. We also include and revisiting the most relevant features that
Entity-wide disclosures The acquisition method at a glance
Generally, financial information is required to be reported on the same basis as Mergers and acquisitions (business combinations) can have a fundamental
is used internally for evaluating operating segment performance and deciding impact on the acquirer’s operations, resources and strategies. For most
how to allocate resources to operating segments. IFRS 8 ‘Operating Segments’ entities such transactions are infrequent, and each is unique. IFRS 3 ‘Business
sets out these requirements and asks for reconciliations of total reportable Combinations’ contains the requirements for these transactions, which are
segment revenues, total profit or loss, total assets, liabilities and other amounts challenging in practice. The Standard itself has been in place for more than ten
several examples illustrating the Standard’s could impact your business. The key topics
disclosed for reportable segments to corresponding amounts in the entity’s years now and has undergone a post implementation review by the IASB. It is
financial statements. one of the most referred to Standards currently issued.
Our ‘Insights into IFRS 8’ series is designed to illustrate how Our ‘Insights into IFRS 3’ series summarises the key areas of
IFRS 8 should be applied and it provides guidance and insight the Standard, highlighting aspects that are more difficult to
in some problematic areas. We also provide several examples interpret and revisiting the most relevant features that could
Tax
challenging situations. Each edition focuses cryptocurrencies while touching upon other issues that may be
Global
IFRS Viewpoint
Related party loans at below-market interest rates
on an area where the Standards have encountered in this area.
What’s the issue?
proved difficult to apply or lack guidance.
Accounting for crypto assets – mining and validation issues –
Loans are one type of financial instrument. As such they are governed by
IFRS 9 (2014) ‘Financial Instruments’ which requires all financial instruments to be
initially recognised at fair value. This can create issues when loans are made at
below-market rates of interest, which is often the case for loans to related parties.
Normally the transaction price of a loan (ie the loan amount) will represent its
fair value. For loans made to related parties however, this may not always be the
Related party loans at below-market This issue seeks to explore the accounting issues that arise for
case as such loans are often not on commercial terms. Where this is the case, the
fair value of the loans must be calculated and the difference between fair value
and transaction price accounted for. This IFRS Viewpoint provides a framework
for analysing both the initial and subsequent accounting for such loans. Common
examples of such loans include inter-company loans (in the separate or
individual financial statements) and employee loans.
interest rates – This IFRS Viewpoint released miners and validators in mining and maintaining the blockchain
Our ‘IFRS Viewpoint’ series provides insights from our global
IFRS team on applying IFRSs in challenging situations. Each
edition will focus on an area where the Standards have proved
difficult to apply or lack guidance.
Relevant IFRS
If you would like to discuss any of these publications, please speak to your usual Grant Thornton contact or visit
www.grantthornton.global/locations to find your local member firm.