Chen 2018

International Journal of Marketing Studies; Vol. 6, No.
5; 2014
ISSN 1918-719X E-ISSN 1918-7203
Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education
The Impact of Green Marketing and Perceived Innovation on

Purchase Intention for Green Products
Shwu-Ing Wu1 & Yen-Jou Chen1
1
Department of Business Administration, National Chin-Yi University of Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Correspondence: Professor Shwu-Ing Wu, Department of Business Administration, National Chin-Yi University
of Technology, No.57, Section 2, Chungshan Road, Taiping, Taichung, Taiwan 411, R.O.C. Tel:
886-4-2392-4505. E-mail: [email protected]
Received: August 1, 2014 Accepted: September 4, 2014 Online Published: September 28, 2014
doi:10.5539/ijms.v6n5p81 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijms.v6n5p81
Abstract
With the rise of eco-awareness and innovation in recent years, companies have constantly sought to be the first
to introduce new green-concept products to the market to gain a larger market share. However, it is unclear
whether consumer awareness of green marketing and innovation will increase purchase intention. This issue
requires an in-depth discussion. This study uses energy-saving lamps and environmental cleanser as examples,
using a literature review and empirical research to explore the correlations between consumer awareness of green
marketing, perceived innovation, perceived quality, perceived price, perceived risk, perceived value, and
purchase intention. Further, an overall relationship model is established.
An analysis of 320 effective questionnaires about energy-saving lamp and 310 effective questionnaires about an
environmental cleanser resulted in three main findings: (1) Consumers’ green marketing awareness of both
energy-saving lamp and an environmental cleanser mainly influences their perceived quality and perceived value,
which in turn influence purchase intention. (2) Consumers’ perceived innovation of energy-saving lamp mainly
influences their perceived quality, perceived price, and perceived value, while consumers’ perceived innovation
of an environmental cleanser mainly influences their perceived quality and perceived value, all of which in turn
influence purchase intention. (3) The results for the two products indicate that the impact of consumers’ green
marketing awareness on purchase intention is greater than the impact of perceived innovation. Through SEM
analysis, this study establishes a valid relationship model for green products and identifies the main influence
paths. In addition, measurement variables and a scale were established, which provide academics and industry
with critical research tools and concepts that should be of academic and practical value.
Keywords: green marketing awareness, perceived innovation, perceived quality, perceived price, perceived risk,
perceived value, purchase intention
1. Introduction
The green industry has become popular in recent years. With an increase in the public’s environmental awareness,
the trend of green consumption is moving into the market mainstream. Most people in developed countries
regard environmental protection as an important factor in purchase decisions (Peattie, 1992). Therefore, most
companies offer green products to meet and satisfy consumer requirements and conduct green marketing
initiatives to drive green consumption. Green marketing suggests that the entire lifecycle of a product, from
materials acquisition, production, sale, and consumption, to the disposal of waste, has a minimum impact on the
environment (Charter, 1991). It is a marketing model that puts the environmental protection concept into the
product design, production, and service process (Tu, 2002). Therefore, green marketing is an indispensable
strategy for companies involved in market competition. Meanwhile, consumer are actively trying to reduce their
impact on the environment, however, this is not widespread and is still evolving (Cherian & Jacob, 2012).
Therefore, the question of whether consumer awareness the green marketing performed by companies and
whether which will increase consumer’s purchase intention that requires an in-depth discussion.
In addition to green consciousness, innovation is another important aspect that influences consumers’ purchase
intention and market performance (Pujari, 2006). Meanwhile, green marketing as an opportunity for innovation
(Ottman, 2013). Freeman (1982) proposed that “not to innovate is to die”; this means innovation will influence
enterprise growth and determine whether or not an enterprise will survive. Thus, a company must constantly
81
www.ccsenet.org/ijms International Journal of Marketing Studies Vol. 6, No. 5; 2014
innovate in order to survive in a competitive environment (Porter & Van, 1995). Hurley and Hult (1998) found
that almost all industries engaged in innovative activities in a dynamic market. However, the question of how the
companies’ innovation strategies are perceived by consumers and how effective they are requires further
exploration.
Many scholars studied green marketing and innovation separately, such as: Charter (1991), Peattie (1992), and
Prakash (2002) investigated the topic of green marketing; Vrakking (1990) and Higgins (1995) studied
innovation issue. But, few studies have discussed the combination of both issues. However, a key question when
focusing on green products is what is the consumer’s perception? Is the item a green product or an innovative
product? Which one is more important in influencing consumers’ purchase intention? These issues are few been
discussed simultaneously.
In addition to green marketing and innovation aspects, there are the between-antecedent (that is, green marketing
and innovation aspects) mediator variables and consequence variables (such as purchase intention). Monroe and
Krishnan (1985) proposed that consumer perception of product price is an indicator of perceived quality and
perceived sacrifice, and perceived value can be obtained by comparing the perceived quality and perceived
sacrifice. This perceived value affects purchase intention. On the other hand, higher perceived risk will hinder
consumers’ purchase intention? In light of the above, this study aims to investigate the impact of green
marketing awareness and perceived innovation of green products on purchase intention. At the same time, the
perceived factors, including perceived quality, perceived price, perceived risk, and perceived value are all used
as mediator variables to establish a full relationship model. Furthermore, we compare the effect of green
marketing awareness and perceived innovation.
Obviously, using energy-saving lamps will be the trend in the future. Due to energy-saving lamp can save energy
and reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Therefore, energy-saving lamps are selected as a study object. On the other
hand, a survey done by Shelton Group Eco Pulse showed that the green products consumers most want to buy
are household cleaning products (75%) (Green Business News, 2010). Thus, an environmental cleanser is
another product selected for this study. Both of these two products are meet the definition of green product by
Ottman, Stafford & Hartman (2006) and Dangelico & Pontrandolfo (2010). They proposed that the main types of
environmental focus of green product development, namely energy, resources, reducing pollution and waste.
Consumers in Taiwan were interviewed to explore their perceptions about green marketing and innovation
toward energy-saving lamp and environmental cleanser, and their perceived quality, perceived price, perceived
risk, perceived value and purchase intention focus on these two green products.
2. Literature Review and Research Hypotheses
2.1 Consumer’s Green Marketing Awareness and Perceived Quality
Green marketing is an organized environmental protection campaign that the general public cares about because
it improves the environment (Kotler & Armstrong, 2008). Grewal and Levy (2008) proposed that green
marketing provides consumers with more eco-friendly products through strategies employed by the relevant
enterprises. Therefore, green marketing can more protect environment than general marketing methods (Gail,
2010). Polonsky (2011) defined green marketing as that all activities designed by companies in order to satisfy
human needs or wants with minimal detrimental impact on the natural environment. Consumer’s green
marketing awareness means consumer aware that green marketing covers the overall brand of marketing
activities undertaken by companies in a manner that they promote manufacture of products or service operation
which have a positive impact on environment or alternatively reduce negative impact on the environment
(Cherian & Jacob, 2012). Chen and Kao (2005) addressed six dimensions for green marketing evaluation: green
products, green manufacturing and packaging, green design, green promotion, green enterprises, and green
consumption. The indictors for measuring consumers’ green marketing awareness in this study are designed
based on these six dimensions of Chen and Kao (2005).
Perceived quality means evaluates consumer perception on the quality of a product (Tsiotsou, 2006); represents
consumers’ overall judgment on the superiority of a product (Zeithaml, 1988). Perceived quality is influenced by
consumers’ subjective perception and environmental contexts (Zeithaml & Bitner, 2000). In this study, perceived
quality is measured using the four dimensions of Petrick (2002): superiority, consistency, dependability, and
reliability, since these can be used to measure consumers’ overall judgment of a product or service.
When consumer aware a company performs green marketing that can increases consumers’ perception of high
quality, purchase intention, and environmental perception of the products (Lin, 1996). Ottman (1999) pointed out
that the goals of green marketing are as follows: (1) products should be developed to satisfy consumers in quality,
function, price, and convenience as well as influence the environment the least; (2) products should establish a
82
high-quality image. Hence, the one of the fundamental reason for consumers to purchase green products lies in
the expectation of high quality in green products. Hendershot (2009) proposed that green products provide high
quality and high efficiency and offer consumers extra benefits, such as being healthier. Simon (1992) proposed
that the quality of a green product is better than others. Thus, consumers will perceive the quality positively if
they feel a product has green marketing characteristics. However, Drumwright (1998) point out that consumers
felt green goods were lower quality and impede purchase that need further explore. Therefore, the following
hypothesis is established:
H1: Green marketing awareness by consumer toward a green product has a positive influence on consumer’s
perceived quality.
2.2 Green Marketing Awareness and Perceived Price
Perceived price is a feeling that consumers have about the price of a product; it is an overall concept including
the paid currency and non-currency costs (Zeithaml, 1988). Generally, it is difficult for consumers to remember
the actual price of a product, so the actual price is transferred into one concept. For example, “cheap” indicates a
low price or better value, whereas “expensive” indicates a high price or goods cost more; these perceptions,
which easily stay in one’s memory, indicate the so-called perceived price (Kashyap & Bojanic, 2000). Petrick
(2002) proposed six indexes to measure consumers’ perceived price: an excellent purchase, equivalent value,
above the value, reasonable price, economic, and a fine trade. These indexes were used to design the
measurement items for consumers’ perceived price in this study.
Kassarjian (1971) discovered that consumers’ concern about environmental pollution was a crucial variable that
made them willing to purchase green products with a higher price. MacKenzie (2000) found that 75% of
Americans were willing to purchase green products with a higher price. The TNS Global Market Research
investigation found that 52% of people in Taiwan were willing to pay extra money for green products (TNS,
2008). Green Gauge’s study discovered that 74% of consumers thought that green products were worth higher
prices (Makower, 2009). Boston Consulting Group’s investigation showed that 82% of consumers were willing
to pay more for green products (Hendershot, 2009). It is thus obvious that most people in various countries are
willing to spend extra money for green products. Thus, consumers tend to have higher price perception toward
the green products (Leonidou, Katsikeas & Morgan, 2012). Therefore, the following hypothesis is established:
perceived price.
2.3 Green Marketing Awareness and Perceived Risk
Perceived risk indicates consumers’ uncertainty about the outcomes of individual purchase, use, or disposal
behavior (Hoyer & Macinnis, 2010). Any uncertainty or unfavorable result that consumers perceive is
subjectively an expected loss (Sweeney, Soutar, & Johnson, 1999). Perceived risk can be defined as the
characteristics and sum of the risk that consumers expect from particular purchase behavior (Lim, 2003).
Consumers’ perceived risk is multi-dimensional (Roselius, 1971). Jacoby and Kaplan (1972) divided consumers’
perceived risk into five categories: financial risk, performance risk, physical risk, psychological risk, and social
risk. Kaplan (1974) further proved that these five types of risk could be used to explain the overall concept of
consumers’ perceived risk. Hence, this study uses these five categories to measure consumers’ perceived risk.
Since green marketing provides consumers with more eco-friendly products (Grewal & Levy, 2008), it is an
organized campaign that protects the general public and improves the environment (Kotler & Armstrong, 2008).
Bjorner et al. (2004) pointed out that the implementation of green marketing can help consumers identify
environmentally friendly products and form a basis for buying green products, which can also reduce consumer
uncertainty. Therefore, consumers will perceive that green products have more value and reduce their perceived
risk (Gail, 2010; Leonidou, Katsikeas, & Morgan, 2012). Thus, the high green marketing awareness by consumer,
will reduced consumer’s perceived risk. Therefore, the following hypothesis is established:
H3: Green marketing awareness by consumer toward a green product has a negative influence on consumer’s
perceived risk.
2.4 Green Marketing Awareness and Perceived Value
Zeithaml (1988) defined consumers’ perceived value as the overall evaluation consumers made of a product
based on their gains and what they paid. Sheth, Newman, and Gross (1991) proposed five types of perceived
value—functional value, social value, emotional value, epistemic value, and conditional value—which further
influence consumers’ selection. Moreover, Sweeney and Soutar (2001) classified perceived value into four
dimensions: emotional, social, quality/performance, and price/monetary. These dimensions were referred to in
83
the design of the measurement items for perceived value in this study.
The motive for consumers to purchase green products is that green products provide extra value, such as high
security and environmental protection (Manget, 2009). If consumers perceive the functions and effects of green
goods, their perceived value of green marketing will definitely improve (Yan & Chang, 2006). To take
energy-saving lamps as an example, if consumers think that these lamps can save energy and reduce carbon
emissions in ways that meet the principles of environmental protection, such as reducing, reusing, and recycling,
they will think purchasing energy-saving lamps is valuable behavior (Chang, 2005). Thus, the greater consumers’
perception of a product’s green marketing, the higher the perceived value is. Therefore, the following hypothesis
is established:
perceived value.
2.5 Green Marketing Awareness and Purchase Intention
Purchase intention indicates an emotional reaction resulting from consumers’ overall evaluation of a product, and
also indicates the possibility that consumers would like to purchase the product (Grewal, Monroe, & Krishnan,
1998). Purchase intention is the most precise predictor of purchase behavior (Morwitz & Schmittlein, 1992).
Zeithaml (1988) proposed three indexes—the possibility that consumers will purchase the product, whether they
consider buying the product, and whether they will recommend the product to their relatives and friends—as the
variables for measuring purchase intention. Dodds, Monroe, and Grewal (1991) raised items for measuring
purchase intention, including purchase possibility, purchase price, purchase probability, and purchase intention.
Bei and Yu (2001) measured consumers’ purchase intention using two major items: re-purchase and
recommending the item to other consumers. The above indexes were used in the development of the
measurement variables for purchase intention in this study.
Balderjahn (1988) found that consumers possessing a positive attitude about environmental protection would
purchase and use more green products. Consumers begin to value environmental issues gradually and
consequently become more willing to purchase green products (Loudon & Bitta, 1988). Greenseal (2009) found
that most consumers were still willing to purchase green products even in an economic downturn. Burst Media’s
(2010) investigation showed that consumers believing in the green concept were willing to spend more money to
purchase green organic products. Environmental advertisements and Ecological packaging are positively related
with the green purchase intention (Ansar, 2013). Therefore, the following hypothesis is established:
purchase intention.
2.6 Perceived Innovation and Perceived Quality
An “innovation” indicates any new product, service, or creative element considered to be novel, including
technological improvements, new changes to products and production, and new marketing methods (Porter,
1990). Innovation also represents updates to design that distinguish an organization from its competitors
(Vrakking, 1990). De Brentani (2001) addressed that innovation indicates the degree of developing new products
or gradual improvement, and simultaneously took into account novelty in technologies and markets.
Higgins (1995) classified innovation into four types: product innovation, procedure innovation, marketing
innovation, and management innovation. Betz (2003) divided innovation into product innovation, manufacturing
process innovation, and service innovation. Rogers (1995) argued that innovation has five features: relative
advantage, compatibility, complexity, trialability, and observability. He suggested these features are identified by
consumers as perceived innovation. Therefore, perceived innovation is a required measure based on the
consumer viewpoint.
Kwaku (1995) found that the more curious consumers felt about an innovative product, the more they would
recognize any improvement in its quality, functions, and benefits. Roberston (1985) argued that compared with
existing products, innovative products provide greater value and quality. Ottenbacher and Gnoth (2005)
addressed that innovation could improve the quality of products and attract potential customers to purchase.
Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H6: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s perceived quality.
2.7 Perceived Innovation and Perceived Price
When introduce an innovative product, many companies take a high pricing, so the prices of innovative products
are usually higher (Kotler & Armstrong, 2008). Furthermore, most consumers think that innovative products
84
have new functions or better utility, so their prices will be relatively higher (OECD, 2009). Since consumers
interested in an innovative product tend to like exciting and novel things, they are willing to take risks and pay
more (Roger, 1995). NPD (2010) investigated consumers’ perception and attitudes about innovative products and
also found that consumers thought innovative products were worth higher prices. Therefore, this study proposes
the following hypothesis:
H7: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s perceived price.
2.8 Perceived Innovation and Perceived Risk
Ram (1987) showed that consumers might deny the existence of innovation, and innovation resistance originated
from consumers’ normal response based on this instinct. When consumers perceive risk due to functional or
mental obstacles, they try to delay the adoption of innovation (Ram & Sheth, 1989). Rogers (1995) argued that
not all innovations would be accepted positively; there could be obstacles that cause consumers to refuse to
purchase innovative products.
Sheth (1981) considered that innovation resistance mainly came from the consumer’s behavioral habits and the
perceived risk of adopting innovation. Ram (1989) brought up three factors of innovation resistance: risk, the
necessity for more information, and the previous structure of faith. All these obstacles increase consumers’
perceived risk of innovative products. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H8: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s perceived risk.
2.9 Perceived Innovation and Perceived Value
Rogers (1995) proposed that the influence of innovation on consumers included the advance of relative
predominance, that is, product innovation brings consumers positive value. Flint et al. (1997) argued that
customer value would improve due to the influence of critical events, such as technological and service
innovations. Bourdeau et al. (2002) also proved that consumers advanced each type of value while using
innovative technology. Weerawardena (2003) addressed that innovation gradually improves products, production,
service, and marketing systems to increase customer value. Tsai et al. (2010) discovered that developing new
products and new services positively influences consumers’ expectations and satisfaction and further enhances
customer value. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H9: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s perceived value.
2.10 Perceived Innovation and Purchase Intention
Innovative products should bring consumers more value in order to increase their acceptance and raise their
purchase intention (Holak, 1988). Boyd and Mason (1999) found that the attraction of innovation influenced
consumers’ attitudes and tendencies, which further influences their purchase intention.
Holak and Lehmann (1990) pointed out that the predominance of a product more innovative than previous
products could be regarded as an index of related product benefits, that is, of the major concerns for enhancing
consumers’ purchase of innovative products. Horn and Salvendy (2006) found that if consumers were provided
more detailed information on innovative products, their purchase intention would be positively stimulated.
H10: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s purchase intention.
2.11 Perceived Quality and Perceived Value
Generally, higher perceived quality generates higher perceived value (Monroe & Krishnan, 1985; Zeithaml,
1988). Hence, when perceived quality is greater than perceived sacrifice, consumers have positive perceived
value. A positive relationship thus exists between perceived quality and perceived value.
According to Chen and Dubinsky (2003) and Grewal et al. (1998), the value that consumers gain is mainly the
benefit obtained from product quality. The greater the product quality consumers perceive, the higher is the
perceived value. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H11: Consumer’s perceived quality toward a green product has a positive influence on consumer’s perceived
value.
2.12 Perceived Quality and Purchase Intention
Chaudhuri (2002) considered perceived quality to be an important factor in consumers’ satisfaction, in that the
higher perceived quality consumers had, the higher their purchase intention was. Zeithaml’s (1988) causal
relation model showed that consumers’ purchase intention depended on perceived value, and perceived value
85
came from perceived quality, so the increase of perceived quality increased consumers’ purchase intention.
Dodds et al. (1991) also discovered that perceived quality positively influenced perceived value, and perceived
value also positively influenced purchase intention. Petrick (2004) found that when the perceived quality of a
product was high, the perceived value would be high, and the purchase intention would also increase. Tsiotsou
(2006) further proved that perceived quality and purchase intention were directly positively correlated, so
perceived quality could be used in predicting purchase intention. Therefore, this study proposes the following
hypothesis:
H12: Consumer’s perceived quality toward a green product has a positive influence on consumer’s purchase
intention.
2.13 Perceived Price and Perceived Value
Bruce and Abhijit (2002) indicated that when consumers perceive that a price is high, they feel what they paid is
more than what they gained, so the perceived value decreases. Therefore, they proved that perceived price has a
direct negative influence on perceived value (Oh, 1999; Tam, 2004). Previous research has also found that price
has a direct negative influence on perceived value (Dodds et al., 1991; Sweeney, Soutar & Johnson, 1999).
H13: Consumer’s perceived price toward a green product has a negative influence on consumer’s perceived
value.
2.14 Perceived Price and Purchase Intention
Tsai and Lee (1999) argued that perceived price indicates consumers’ sensitivity to price variation: people with
greater price perception were described as being less willing to purchase products.
Suter and Hardesty (2005) pointed out that consumers’ perceived price has significant influence on their
purchase intention. When the price of a product is obviously high, consumers think they are treated unfairly, and
the purchase intention decreases (Maxwell, 2001; Babin, Hardesty & Suter, 2003). Therefore, this study proposes
the following hypothesis:
H14: Consumer’s perceived price toward a green product has a negative influence on consumer’s purchase
intention.
2.15 Perceived Risk and Perceived Value
Wood and Scheer (1996) regarded perceived risk as a necessary cost to obtain a product that influences the
perceived value through overall trade evaluation. Agarwal and Teas (2001) suggested that a significantly
negative relation exists between perceived risk and consumers’ perceived value. Tsai, Lee, and Wu (2004) and
Wood and Scheer (1996) discovered that for consumers, perceived risk is an invisible cost when purchasing
products, and it has direct negative influence on perceived value. When consumers make purchase decisions,
they evaluate risk, and when their perceived risk of a product is high, their perceived value of the product is
lowered (Sweeney et al., 1999). Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H15: Consumer’s perceived risk toward a green product has a negative influence on consumer’s perceived value.
2.16 Perceived Risk and Purchase Intention
When consumers cannot predict purchase results and feel uncertain, perceived risk exists in their
decision-making process (McKnight et al., 2002). Bettman (1973) argued that consumers’ purchase intention is
influenced negatively by perceived risk. Roselius (1971) pointed out that when encountering perceived risk,
consumers usually have diversified reactions, one of which is to delay the purchase behavior in order to transfer
the loss.
Taylor (1974) considered that before purchasing, consumers perceive the risk a product could generate; this type
of risk reduces consumers’ purchase impulse because they want to avoid unpleasantness after the purchase.
Shimp and Bearden (1982) and Garretson and Clow (1999) also found that when consumers have high perceived
risk, their purchase intention is reduced. Therefore, this study proposes the following hypothesis:
H16: Consumer’s perceived risk toward a green product has a negative influence on consumer’s purchase
intention.
2.17 Perceived Value and Purchase Intention
Fornell, Johnson, Anderson, Cha, and Bryant (1996) pointed out that consumers are influenced by perceived
value when they purchase products. Thus, consumers’ purchase intention depends on their perceived value of a
product, which indicates a positive association between perceived value and purchase intention (Zeithaml, 1988;
86
Grewal et al., 1998).

Kaufman (1998) considered that perceived value could be used to discover customers’ desire, demand, and
exchange value for goods or services when deciding whether or not to purchase. Perceived value is consumers’
subjective perception; it is relevant to consumers’ emotional response and consumption experience and further
influences consumer behavior (Dumana & Mattilab, 2005). Rizwan et al. (2013) found that green perceived
value is positively associated with green purchase intention. Since the value of a product in a consumer mind
will establish a trust and therefore the consumers’ purchasing behavior will also be encouraged. Thus, high
perceived value increases consumers’ purchase intention (Bellizzi, 1981). Therefore, this study proposes the
following hypothesis:
H17: Consumer’s perceived value toward a green product has a positive influence on consumer’s purchase
intention.
3. Research Design
3.1 Research Framework
To summarize the literature review and research hypothesis, this study establishes the research framework
depicted in Figure 1. This study is the first to explore two independent variables—green marketing awareness
and perceived innovation; how these independent variables affect the mediator variables of perceived quality,
perceived price, perceived risk, and perceived value; and further how to affect the dependent variable, purchase
intentions.
Figure 1. Research framework
3.2 Questionnaire Design

The self-completion questionnaire is “a questionnaire that the respondent answers without the aid of an
interviewer” (Bryman & Bell, 2011). Thus the respondents cannot be influenced by the interviewer; their
answers should be more objective. A questionnaire is “a formalized framework consisting of a set of questions
and scales designed to generate primary data” (Shiu et al., 2009). As said previously a self-completion
questionnaire seems to be the best approach for the quantitative method.
Therefore, the related literature and measurement items were first used as a reference for the design of the draft
questionnaire. The questionnaire is divided into eight sections: green marketing awareness (reference from Chen
and Kao (2005)), perceived innovation (reference from Betz (2003)), perceived quality (reference from Petrick
(2002)), perceived price (reference from Petrick (2002)), perceived risk (reference from Kaplan (1974)),
perceived value (reference from Sweeney and Soutar (2001)), and purchase intention (reference from Dodds,
Monroe, and Grewal (1991)and Bei and Yu (2001)); all were evaluated with a seven-point Likert scale, where a
higher score indicates stronger agreement. There is also a final section that records demographics using a
nominal scale.
Next, a pretest was administered to determine the necessary modifications. In this step, 30 consumers were
selected through convenience sampling for interviews. The results showed that some of the questions were
ambiguous and required revisions that were incorporated.
After modification, convenience sampling was applied again to pick 50 interviewees for each
product—energy-saving lamps and an environmental cleanser—to perform the pilot test. The modified questions
were answered, and reliability and validity were analyzed. After reliability and validity testing, two perceived
risk items for both products with factor loading lower than 0.6 and correlation coefficients of item-to-total lower
than 0.5 were removed, and the analysis was performed again. The results revealed that the Cronbach’s α value
87
of each measurement aspect exceeded 0.7 and the item-to-total correlations coefficient was larger than 0.5 that
show the good reliability (Nunnally, 1978). The factor analysis show that the eigenvalue of each measurement
factor was larger than 1, the cumulative explained variance of each measurement factor was higher than 0.5, the
factor loading of each question was larger than 0.6, which show that all of the measurement dimensions have
convergent validity (Kaiser, 1958; Kerlinger, 1978). Hence, the remaining items were used as the formal
questionnaire for a large-scale survey.
4. Research Results and Discussion
4.1 Sampling
In this study, Taiwanese consumers older than 20 years were selected as the main interviewees. The sample size
was calculated using the concept of probability sampling. This study assumed that tolerable error(e) is 5%,
population proportion(P) is 0.5, and confidence interval is 95%(Z=1.96). Then the formula of sample size shown
as: Z2*P*(1-P)/e2= (1.96)2*0.5*(1-0.5)/(0.05)2=384.16. Therefore, 385 is a suitable sample size of questionnaire.
Beside, Boomsma & Hoogland (2001) defined that 400 is the best and appropriate of the sample size, so we take
400 questionnaires as our sample size.
Convenience sampling is a sampling technique that obtains and collects the relevant information from sampling
is normally used for collecting a large number of completed surveys speedily and with economy. Through a
convenience sampling method, 400 interviewees were selected for each product. After two months, we received
630 valid questionnaires; 320 dealt with energy-saving lamp and 310 dealt with the environmental cleanser.
The sample structure shows that the two groups of respondents had similar backgrounds. The major
characteristics of the two groups (energy-saving lamps and environmental cleanser) were that most respondents
were female (60.9%, 61.9%), aged 21–30 (39.1%, 37.4%), college graduates (52.5%, 50.6%), and single (67.2%,
64.8%), and that the main reason they purchase green products is because they want to be environmentally
friendly (85.0%, 85.8%).
4.2 Reliability and Validity Analysis
The Cronbach’s α, correlation, and factor analyses were applied to evaluate the reliability and validity of the
valid questionnaires. The results show that the Cronbach’s α of each measurement is greater than 0.7, which
means the reliability of each measurement is high (Nunnally, 1978). The validity analysis results show that the
eigenvalues of the measurement factors are greater than 1, the cumulative explained variances are all greater than
0.5, the factor loadings are all greater than 0.5, and the correlation coefficients of item-to-total are all greater than
0.5 ( as shown in Tables 1 and 2), which means that all of the measurement dimensions have convergent validity
(Kaiser, 1958; Kerlinger, 1978).
Table 1. Reliability and validity analysis—Energy-Saving Lamp

Item-total Cumulative
Factor Cronbach’s
Items correlation Eigenvalue explained
loading α
coefficients variance %
Green marketing awareness
Energy-Saving Lamp can reduce environmental pollution 0.674 0.765 4.904 61.304 0.909
Energy-Saving Lamp is a green product 0.782 0.850
The production of Energy-Saving Lamp can reduce the waste of 0.721 0.799
resources
Energy-Saving Lamp meet the concept of carbon reduction 0.783 0.851
Energy-Saving Lamp comply with environmental protection 0.623 0.702
concept
Energy-Saving Lamp enable consumers pay attention on 0.587 0.665
environmental issues
Energy-Saving Lamp can meet social responsibility 0.719 0.792
Using Energy-Saving Lamp is right behavior 0.750 0.820
Perceived innovation
Energy-Saving Lamp is a improvement product 0.658 0.757 4.650 51.671 0.881
Energy-Saving Lamp has innovation concept 0.729 0.812
The function of Energy-Saving Lamp has great difference 0.567 0.659
Energy-Saving Lamp has different design 0.594 0.686
Energy-Saving Lamp can saving more 0.549 0.633
88
The cleaning effect of Energy-Saving Lamp will stronger 0.570 0.659

Energy-Saving Lamp has a creative promotion method 0.741 0.812
Energy-Saving Lamp can attracting consumer 0.581 0.682
The innovation idea of Energy-Saving Lamp is outstanding 0.651 0.744
Perceived quality
The quality of Energy-Saving Lamp is superior 0.775 0.860 3.913 78.268 0.929
The quality of Energy-Saving Lamp is stable 0.880 0.931
The quality of Energy-Saving Lamp is reliability 0.860 0.920
The quality of Energy-Saving Lamp is high 0.880 0.929
The quality of Energy-Saving Lamp is effective 0.670 0.772
Perceived price
The price of Energy-Saving Lamp is expensive 0.840 0.923 3.023 75.566 0.890
The price of Energy-Saving Lamp is costly 0.858 0.932
The price of Energy-Saving Lamp is higher than the ordinary 0.662 0.801
cleanser
The price of Energy-Saving Lamp is higher than my expected 0.680 0.812
Perceived risk
I am afraid that Energy-Saving Lamp is unvalued 0.682 0.792 3.890 64.840 0.891
I am afraid that Energy-Saving Lamp cannot meet the expectation 0.721 0.820
I am afraid that Energy-Saving Lamp cannot ensure its safety 0.698 0.792
I am afraid that Energy-Saving Lamp can not to protect my health 0.723 0.811
I am afraid that Energy-Saving Lamp is useless 0.706 0.798
I am afraid that Energy-Saving Lamp is ineffectiveness 0.730 0.818
Perceived value
Energy-Saving Lamp give me extra value 0.757 0.844 3.801 76.015 0.921
It’s worth to pay more money for Energy-Saving Lamp 0.799 0.875
Energy-Saving Lamp have high utility 0.821 0.891
Energy-Saving Lamp can meet my requirements 0.820 0.890
Energy-Saving Lamp give me more benefits than the costs 0.777 0.859
Purchase intention
I like to purchase Energy-Saving Lamp 0.765 0.851 3.799 75.892 0.921
I will pay more money on Energy-Saving Lamp 0.784 0.866
I will take Energy-Saving Lamp as a first consideration 0.800 0.877
I will repeat purchasing Energy-Saving Lamp 0.881 0.930
I will recommend other people to purchase Energy-Saving Lamp 0.739 0.831
Table 2. Reliability and validity analysis—Environmental Cleanser

Item-total Cumulative
Factor Cronbach’s
Items correlation Eigenvalue explained
loading α
coefficients variance %
Green marketing awareness
Environmental Cleanser can reduce environmental pollution 0.721 0.801 5.007 62.584 0.914
Environmental Cleanser is a green product 0.756 0.828
The production of Environmental Cleanser can reduce the waste 0.725 0.798
of resources
Environmental Cleanser meet the concept of carbon reduction 0.785 0.847
Environmental Cleanser comply with environmental protection 0.685 0.759
concept
Environmental Cleanser enable consumers pay attention on 0.724 0.791
environmental issues
Environmental Cleanser can meet social responsibility 0.651 0.728
Using Environmental Cleanser is right behavior 0.692 0.770
Perceived innovation
Environmental Cleanser is a improvement product 0.684 0.758 5.532 61.463 0.921
Environmental Cleanser has innovation concept 0.730 0.795
The function of Environmental Cleanser has great difference 0.631 0.703
Environmental Cleanser has different design 0.738 0.799
Environmental Cleanser can saving more 0.701 0.765
89
The cleaning effect of Environmental Cleanser will stronger 0.703 0.767

Environmental Cleanser has a creative promotion method 0.787 0.843
Environmental Cleanser can attracting consumer 0.744 0.809
The innovation idea of Environmental Cleanser is outstanding 0.743 0.809
Perceived quality
The quality of Environmental Cleanser is superior 0.807 0.880 3.922 78.444 0.930
The quality of Environmental Cleanser is stable 0.858 0.917
The quality of Environmental Cleanser is reliability 0.870 0.924
The quality of Environmental Cleanser is high 0.862 0.919
The quality of Environmental Cleanser is effective 0.682 0.781
Perceived price
The price of Environmental Cleanser is expensive 0.824 0.907 3.162 79.039 0.911
The price of Environmental Cleanser is costly 0.857 0.926
The price of Environmental Cleanser is higher than the ordinary 0.752 0.858
cleanser
The price of Environmental Cleanser is higher than my expected 0.761 0.864
Perceived risk
I am afraid that Environmental Cleanser is unvalued 0.696 0.808 3.676 61.263 0.873
I am afraid that Environmental Cleanser can not meet the 0.725 0.827
expectation
I am afraid that Environmental Cleanser cannot ensure its safety 0.730 0.826
I am afraid that Environmental Cleanser can not to protect my 0.682 0.787
health
I am afraid that Environmental Cleanser is useless 0.579 0.695
I am afraid that Environmental Cleanser is ineffectiveness 0.632 0.745
Perceived value
Environmental Cleanser give me extra value 0.724 0.822 3.631 72.629 0.906
It’s worth to pay more money for Environmental Cleanser 0.759 0.849
Environmental Cleanser have high utility 0.769 0.856
Environmental Cleanser can meet my requirements 0.764 0.854
Environmental Cleanser give me more benefits than the costs 0.798 0.879
Purchase intention
I like to purchase Environmental Cleanser 0.792 0.872 3.813 76.254 0.922
I will pay more money on Environmental Cleanser 0.765 0.852
I will take Environmental Cleanser as a first consideration 0.802 0.877
I will repeat purchasing Environmental Cleanser 0.875 0.925
I will recommend other people to purchase Environmental 0.750 0.838
Cleanser
4.3 Structural Relationship Analysis

Testing of the hypotheses in this section was analyzed through inferential statistics and it was tried to find a
suitable response for research questions given to confirmation or rejection of hypotheses. Using structural
equations models to analysis the causal relationship among the variables then to test the hypothesis was suitable.
This study used AMOS 17.0 software for structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis to understand the
relationships among multiple variables and their intensity. According to the principle of the good model: the
value of GFI, NFI, RFI and CFI should exceed 0.9 (Joreskog & Sorbom, 1989); AGFI should exceed 0.8 (Segars
& Grover, 1993), RMSEA should be no more than 0.08 (Browne & Cudek, 1993), and the ratio of χ2 /df should
be less than 3 (Maciver & Camines, 1981) to test the fitness of the model. The results of SEM analysis show that
the fitness of the full models for both products met or were close to the criteria, so the models were acceptable
(as shown in Figures 2 and 3). Meanwhile, the results show that most of the hypotheses are supported, as shown
in Table 3.
90
Figure 2. Relationship model of Energy-Saving Lamp
Figure 3. Relationship model of Environmental Cleanser
Table 3. The results of hypotheses test

Research results
Research hypotheses
Energy-Saving Lamp Environmental Cleanser
H1: Green marketing awareness by consumer toward a green product has a positive Supported(+**) Supported(+***)
influence on consumer’s perceived quality.
H2: Green marketing awareness by consumer toward a green product has a positive Rejected(-*) Rejected(n.s)
influence on consumer’s perceived price.
H3: Green marketing awareness by consumer toward a green product has a negative Supported(-***) Supported(-**)
influence on consumer’s perceived risk.
H4: Green marketing awareness by consumer toward a green product has a positive Supported(+**) Supported(+***)
influence on consumer’s perceived value.
H5: Green marketing awareness by consumer toward a green product has a positive Supported(+**) Supported(+*)
influence on consumer’s purchase intention.
H6: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s Supported(+***) Supported(+***)
perceived quality
H7: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s Supported(+***) Supported(+***)
perceived price.
H8: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s Supported(+**) Supported(+*)
perceived risk.
H9: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s Supported(+*) Supported(+**)
perceived value.
91
H10: Consumers perceptions on product innovation will positive influence on consumer’s Rejected (n.s) Rejected (n.s)
purchase intention.
H11: Consumer’s perceived quality toward a green product has a positive influence on Supported(+***) Supported(+***)
consumer’s perceived value.
H12: Consumer’s perceived quality toward a green product has a positive influence on Supported(+**) Supported(+***)
consumer’s purchase intention.
H13: Consumer’s perceived price toward a green product has a negative influence on Supported(-*) Supported(-***)
H14: Consumer’s perceived price toward a green product has a negative influence on Supported(-*) Rejected (n.s)
H15: Consumer’s perceived risk toward a green product has a negative influence on Rejected (n.s) Rejected (+*)
H16: Consumer’s perceived risk toward a green product has a negative influence on Rejected (n.s) Rejected (n.s)
H17: Consumer’s perceived value toward a green product has a positive influence on Supported(+***) Supported(+***)
Note. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, n.s: No significance.
This study went further to compare the relationship models of the two products (energy-saving lamp and an
environmental cleanser); the results show that three paths differ between two products. The three paths are the
influence of green marketing on perceived price, the influence of perceived price on purchase intention, and the
influence of perceived risk on perceived value (dotted line in Figure 4). The first difference path shows that
consumers’ green marketing awareness for energy-saving lamp has a significantly negative impact on the
perceived price, but there is no significant impact for the environmental cleanser. Second, consumers’ perceived
price for energy-saving lamp has a significantly negative impact on the purchase intention, but there is no
significant impact for the environmental cleanser. Third, consumers’ perceived risk for the environmental
cleanser has a significantly positive impact on the perceived value, but there is no significant impact for
energy-saving lamp.
With the above exceptions, the paths and direction of the relationships are the same for the two products. The
results show that the relationship paths (solid line in Figure 4) for energy-saving lamp and the environmental
cleanser have a high degree of similarity. The results also establish a specific and valid relationship model for
consumption patterns of green products, which is an important contribution (solid line in Figure 4).
Figure 4. Integration of the common path
4.4 Influence Effects of Each Aspect

To compare the effects of consumers’ green marketing awareness and perceived innovation on purchase intention,
we divided the total influence effect into direct and indirect effects (as shown in Table 4).
Taking energy-saving lamp as an example, the total effect of green marketing awareness on purchase intention is
0.3884, and the total effect of perceived innovation on purchase intention is 0.1977. The results show that the
effect of green marketing awareness is greater than that of perceived innovation. Thus, the purchase intention for
92
energy-saving lamps is majorly dependent on whether the green marketing of the product can be perceived by
consumers.
When considering the environmental cleanser, the total effect of green marketing awareness on purchase
intention is 0.3748, and the total effect of perceived innovation on purchase intention is 0.2722. The results also
show that the purchase intention for the environmental cleanser is majorly dependent on whether the green
marketing of the product can be perceived by consumers.
Therefore, consumers’ green marketing awareness of a green product is a more important factor than perceived
innovation in terms of purchase intention, which is another important finding.
Table 4. Analysis of influence effects of each variable

Direct effect Indirect effect Total effect
Independent Mediator Dependent
Energy-Sa Environ-men Energy-Sa Environ-men Energy-Sa Environ-me
variables variables variables
ving Lamp tal Cleanser ving Lamp tal Cleanser ving Lamp ntal Cleanser
Green marketing purchase 0.202 0.174
awareness intention
Green marketing perceived quality purchase 0.0412 0.0538
awareness intention
Green marketing perceived price purchase 0.0261 -0.0008
awareness intention
Green marketing perceived risk purchase 0.0147 -0.0180
awareness intention
Green marketing perceived value purchase 0.0677 0.1463
awareness intention
Green marketing perceived quality purchase 0.0298 0.0599
awareness & perceived intention
value
Green marketing perceived price purchase 0.0091 -0.0160
awareness & perceived intention
value
Green marketing perceived risk & purchase -0.0022 -0.0244 0.3884 0.3748
awareness perceived value intention
Perceived purchase 0.007 -0.106
innovation intention
Perceived perceived quality purchase 0.1198 0.1230
Perceived perceived price purchase -0.0864 -0.0020
Perceived perceived risk purchase -0.0073 0.0134
Perceived perceived value purchase 0.1069 0.1271
Perceived perceived quality purchase 0.0866 0.1369
innovation & perceived intention
value
Perceived perceived price purchase -0.030 -0.0384
innovation & perceived intention
value
Perceived perceived risk & purchase 0.0011 0.0182 0.1977 0.2722
innovation perceived value intention
Note. Total effect= Direct effect + Indirect effect.
5. Conclusions and suggestions

5.1 Conclusions and Discussion
Through SEM analysis, this study establishes paths and a valid relationship model for green products and
includes some important findings.
93
There are three paths differ based on the different types of green product; however, almost all the paths are the
same for both green products. Therefore, the main relationship paths and relationship model are established as
follows (see Table 4):
(1). Consumers’ green marketing awareness has significantly positive influence on the perceived quality,
perceived value, and purchase intention. The result was consistent with the concepts brought up by Ottman
(1999) and Loudon & Bitta (1988). It indicates that the green marketing perceived by consumers in the green
products brought consumers certain quality assurance, and the consumers believed that purchasing green
products could satisfy their demand in terms of quality, use, and functions, and they would reduce environmental
pollution and the waste of resources, which was worth consumers’ purchase. Consequently, the more influence
consumers have on green marketing awareness, the higher the overall product value is raised, and the purchase
intention will also be enhanced.
(2). This study showed that consumers’ green marketing awareness has significantly negative influence on the
perceived risk, which was consistent with the hypothesis in this study. The result corresponds to the research
such as Bjorner et al. (2004) addressed that the implementation of a green marketing strategy helped consumers
identify green products and further obtain trustworthy information as the basis of purchasing products, which
indirectly reduced consumers’ uncertainty and perceived risk.
(3). Consumers’ perceived innovation toward green products has significantly positive influence on the
perceived quality, perceived price, perceived risk, and perceived value, which mutually proved the concepts
brought up by Roberston (1985), Ram (1989), and Rogers (1995). This indicates that when consumers perceive
the innovation of a green product, they will further perceive the quality changes, which strengthens their
recognition of quality. Moreover, the perceived innovation has significant influence on the perceived price,
indicating that when consumers perceive the innovation of a green product, they will further recognize that the
price may increase. Meanwhile, when consumers perceive the innovation of green products, they will perceive
uncertainties, such as the unsure value of new products, risk, and negatively stereotyped images, which will
increase consumers’ perceived risk. Furthermore, the new functions of innovative green products satisfy more
consumers’ demand, thus, the higher innovation of a green product consumers perceive, the higher the perceived
value is.
(4). Consumers’ perceived quality has a significantly positive influence on perceived value and purchase
intention, which confirms the concepts addressed by Dodds et al. (1991). This indicates that when consumers
perceive higher product quality, they also perceive better value, which leads to stronger purchase intention.
(5). Consumers’ perceived price has a significantly negative influence on perceived value, which confirms the
concepts brought up by Bruce and Abhijit (2002), Oh (1999), and Tam (2004). Therefore, when enterprises carry
out sales strategies related to green products, they should consider the pricing of those green products. If the
prices are too high, consumers’ perceived value will be reduced.
(6). Consumers’ perceived value has significantly positive influence on the purchase intention, which mutually
proved the concepts brought up by Zeithaml (1988), Kaufman (1998), and Dumana & Mattilab (2005). The
higher consumers’ perceived value of green products is, the higher the tendency to have green consumption is.
That is, consumers’ purchase intention depends on the perceived value of products, and when the perceived value
is high, the purchase intention will also be high.
(7). Consumers’ perceived risk has not significant influence on the purchase intention. Therefore, if consumers
can perceive the green and innovative concepts of a product, the purchase intention will increase due to the raise
of the perceived quality and perceived value instead of reducing risk.
(8). According to the comparison between the green marketing awareness and perceived innovation influence on
the purchase intention, the result indicates that the green marketing awareness has higher effect than perceived
innovation. Therefore, green marketing awareness is most key factor for enhancing consumer’s purchase
intention of green products. If manufacturers would like to increase consumers’ purchase intention of green
products, it is better through the perception and feelings provided to consumers by a product’s green marketing
concept in product, technology, production, and promotion.
5.2 Managerial Implications
In this study, not only was the relationship model developed, but measurement variables and a scale were also
established, which provide academia and industry with critical research tools and concepts that should be of
academic and practical value.
This study found that consumers’ green marketing awareness has the maximum influence on purchase intention,
94
which indicates that the greater the perception of green marketing of green products, the higher is consumers’
purchase intention. In particular, green marketing awareness has the greatest effect on the increase of perceived
value. Consequently, it is suggested that enterprises should aim at core consumers and apply green marketing
strategies to bring more consumer recognition. In addition, they should further understand the main influences in
terms of the effects of green marketing strategies and clearly comprehend consumers’ behavioral principles of
green consumption, which will help enterprises develop strategies and actions corresponding to current market
demand.
The results found that the green marketing awareness of the two products had significantly positive influence on
the purchase intention, but the perceived innovation did not. Hence, when consumers purchase green products,
they will value and care about the green concept of products. Consequently, manufacturers can aim at their target
consumer to provide more green information of the green products in order to attract consumers’ attention and
enhancing their purchase intention.
The result indicates that green marketing awareness has a greater effect than perceived innovation. Therefore,
green marketing awareness is the most important factor for enhancing consumers’ purchase intention for green
products. Manufacturers can most successfully increase consumers’ purchase intention for green products
through the perception and feelings they develop through a product’s green marketing concept in terms of
product, technology, production, and promotion.
5.3 Study Limitations and Suggestions for Future Study
This study has delivered valuable results; however, there are still some issues that have to be addressed.
Two separate products used might influence the evaluation of each measurement item. Therefore, the results of
this study may not be generalized to all types of green products. Future studies can compare various products,
leading to further understanding of the differences between various products. Moreover, future studies can verify
the value of the measurement variables and the relationship model.
Green consumers can be divided into different groups, and future studies can segment them accordingly to
further investigate their perceived differences in green products, study the various groups’ purchase intentions
for green products, and develop suitable strategy for the different groups.
Some control variables should be added in the model (for example, age, sex, etc.) that could highlight relevant
effects of these variables on the considered factors.
References
Agarwal, S., & Teas, R. K. (2001). Perceived value: Mediating role of perceived risk. Journal of Marketing
Theory and Practice, 9(4), 1-14.
Ansar, N. (2013). Impact of Green Marketing on Consumer Purchase Intention. Mediterranean Journal of Social
Sciences, 4(11), 650-655.
Babin, B. J., Hardesty, D. M., & Suter, T. A. (2003). Color and shopping intention: The interviewing effect of
price fairness and perceived affect. Journal of Business Research, 56(7), 541-551.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00246-6
Balderjahn, I. (1988). Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible
consumption patterns. Journal of Business Research, 17(1), 51-56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(88)90022-7
Bauer, R. A. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In R. S. Hancock (Ed.), Dynamic Marketing for a
Changing World (pp. 389-398). Chicago: America Marketing Association.
Bei, L. T., & Yu, C. C. (2001). An integrated model for the effects of perceived product, perceived service quality,
and perceived price fairness on consumer satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction,
Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 14, 125-140.
Bellizzi, J. A. (1981). Consumer perceptions of national private and generic brands. Journal of Retailing, 57(4),
56-70.
Bettman, J. R. (1973). Perceived risk and its components: A model and empirical test. Journal of Marketing
Research, 10, 184-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3149824
Betz, F. (2003). Managing Technological innovation: Competitive Advantage from Change. NJ: John Wiley &
Sons.
95
Bjorner, T. B., Hansen, L. G., & Russell, C. S. (2004). Environmental labeling and consumers choice – An
empirical analysis of the effect of the Nordic Swan. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,
47(3), 411-434. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2003.06.002
Boomsma, A., & Hoogland, J. J. (2001). The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. Psychometrika, 51,
313-325.
Bourdeau, L., Chebat, J., & Couturier, C. (2002). Internet consumer value of university students: E-mail v.s. Web
users. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 9(2), 61-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-6989(01)00025-X
Boyd, T. C., & Mason, C. H. (1999). The link between attractiveness of “Extrabrand” attributes and the adoption
of innovations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27, 306-319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092070399273002
Brentani, D. U. (2001). Innovative Versus Incremental New Business Services: Different Keys for Achieving
Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(3), 169-187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0737-6782(01)00071-6
Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1993). Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long
(Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Model (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Bruce, L. A., & Abhijit, B. (2002). The effects of discount level, price consciousness and sale proneness on
consumers’ price perception and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Research, 55(9), 775-783.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00214-9
Brucks, M., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1991). Price and Brand Name as Indicators of Quality Dimensions. Cambridge.
MA: Marketing Science Institute, 91-130.
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd ed.). New York. Oxford: University Press Inc.
Burst Media. (2010). Nine in 10 Consumers Put “Green” in Daily Routine.
Carmines, E. G., & Maclver, J. P. (1981). Analyzing Models with Unobserved Variables. In Bohrnstedt, G. W. &
Borgatta, E. F. (Eds.), Social Measurement: Current Issues (pp.65-115). CA: Sage Publications.
Chang, C. L. (2005). Research of the factors that family’s users buy the energy-efficient bulb. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chase, D., & Smith, T. K. (1992). Consumers keen on green but marketers don’t deliver. Advertising Age, 63,
82-84.
Chaudhuri, A. (2002). How brand reputation affects the advertising-brand equity link. Journal of Advertising
Research, 42(3), 33-43.
Chen, C. Y., & Kao, Y. C. (2005). Development and analysis of a framework for evaluating a green production
and consumption system. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 1-17.
Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. J. (2003). A conceptual model of perceived customer value in E-commerce. A
Preliminary Investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 20(4), 323-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.10076
Cherian, J., & Jacob, J. (2012). Green marketing: A study of consumers’ attitude towards environment friendly
products. Asian Social Science, 8(12), 117-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v8n12p117
Dagnoli, J. (1991). Consciously green. Advertising Age, 14, 41.
Dangelico, R. M., & Pontrandolfo, P. (2010). From green product definitions and classifications to the green
option matrix. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1608-1628.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.07.007
Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’
product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307-319. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172866
Doorn, J. V., & Verhoef, P. C. (2011). Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and
vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 167-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2011.02.005
Dumana, T., & Mattilab, A. S. (2005). The role of affective factors on perceived cruise vacation value. Tourism
Management, 26, 321-323.
EnviroMedia Social Marketing. (2010). New Research Shows Green Shoppers Unfazed by Economic Recession.
96
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and
Research. MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Flint, D. J., Woodruff, R. B., & Gardial S. F. (1997). Customer value change in industrial marketing relationships.
Industrial Marketing Management, 26(2), 163-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(96)00112-5
Fornell, C., Johnson, M. D., Anderson, E. W., Cha, J., & Bryant, B. E. (1996). The American customer
satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. Journal of Marketing, 60, 1-13.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251898
Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. MIT Press, 13-20.
Gail, N. K. (2010). Green Marketing: What Works; What Doesn’t - A Marketing Study of Practitioners,
Environmental Leader.
Garretson, J. A., & Clow, K. E. (1999). The influence of coupon face value on service quality expectation, risk
perceptions and purchase intentions in the dental industry. The Journal of Service Marketing, 13(1), 59-70.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08876049910256122
Garvin, D. A. (1988). Management Quality: The Strategic and Competitive Edge. NY: Free Press.
Gaski, J. F., & Nevin, J. R. (1985). The differential effects of exercised and unexercised power sources in a
marketing channel. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 130-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3151359
Green Business News. (2010). The Simple Secrets to Successful Green Marketing.
GreenSeal. (2009). 2009 National Green Buying Research.
Grewal, D., & Levy, M. (2008). Marketing. NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan R. (1998).The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’
perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2),
46-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1252160
Hendershot, S. (2009). Is green enough to lure clients? Crain’s Chicago Business, 32(28), 16.
Holak, S. L. (2003). Determinants of innovative durables adoption an empirical study with implications for early
product screening. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(Sep.), 50-69.
Holak, S. L., & Lehmann, D. R. (1990). Purchase intentions and the dimensions of innovation: An exploratory
model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(1), 59-73.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(90)90032-A
Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal.
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16(2), 155-175. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20047
Hoyer, D., & Macinnis, D. J. (2010). Consumer Behavior (5th International ed.). Cengage Learning Inc.
Hurley, R. F., & Hult, G. T. M. (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An
integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62, 42-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251742
Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. (1972). The components of perceived risk. In Venkatesan, M. (Ed.), Proceedings of the
3rd Annual Conference (pp. 382-393). Illinois: Association for Consumer Research, Champaign.
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7 user’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software.
Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The Varimax criterion for analysis rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3),
187-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289233
Kaplan, L. B. (1974). Components of perceived risk in product purchase: A cross-validation. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 59(3), 287-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036657
Kashyap, R., & Bojanic, D. C. (2000). A structural analysis of value, quality and price perceptions of business
and leisure travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 39, 45-51.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004728750003900106
Kassarjian, H. (1971). Incorporating ecology into marketing strategy: The case of air pollution. Journal of
Marketing, 61-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1249791
Kaufman, J. J. (1998). Value Management: Creating Competitive Advantage. In Best Management Practices
Series. Menlo Park, CA: Crisp Publications.
Kegerreis, R. J., Engel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D. (1970). Innovativeness and Diffusion: A Marketing View of The
97
Characteristics of Earliest Adopters. Research in Consumer Behavior. NY: Holt, Rinhart and Winston.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1978). Foundation of Behavioral Research. NY: McGraw-Hill.
Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing Management (10th ed.). NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2006). Principle of marketing (11th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2008). Principles of Marketing (12th ed.). NY: Prentice Hall.
Kwaku, A. G. (1995). An exploratory analysis of the impact of market orientation on new product performance:
A contingency approach. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 275-293.
Leonidou, C. N., & Katsikeas, C. S. (2012). “Green” the marketing mix: do firms do it and does it pay off?
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.
Lim, N. (2003). Consumers’ perceived risk: Sources versus consequences. Electronic Commerce Research &
Applications, 2(3), 216-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1567-4223(03)00025-5
Lin, H. W. (1996). The study on the delivery effects of green alliances. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tatung
University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Loudon, D. L., & Bitta, A. J. D. (1988). Consumer Behavior: Concepts and Application. NY: McGraw-Hill.
MacKenzie, D. (2000). You can still shop to save the world. New Statesman, 129(4468), 12-14.
Makower, J. (2009). Bright Green Marketing Challenge, 3 Nov. 2006. TomPaine.com. 14 July 2009.
Manget, J. (2009). Capturing the Green Advantage for Consumer Companies. The Boston Consulting Group.13
July 2009.
Maxwell, S. (2001). Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase. Journal of Economic
Psychology, 23(2), 191-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(02)00063-6
McKnight, D. H., & Chervany N. L. (2002). What trust means in e-commerce customer relationship: An
interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2), 35-59.
Monroe, K. B. (1990). Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions. NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations. In J. Jacoby & J.
Olson (Eds.), Perceived Quality (pp. 209-232). Lexington, MA Lexington Books.
Morris, L., Hastak, M., & Mazis, M. (1995). Consumer comprehension of environmental advertising and
labeling claims. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 29(2), 328-350.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1995.tb00050.x
Morwitz, V. G., & Schmittlein, D. (1992). Using segmentation to improve sales forecasts based on purchase
intent: which interders actually buy? Journal of Marketing Research, 29(4), 391-405.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3172706
NPD. (2010). Apple Owners Nearly 40 Percent More Interested in the iPad than Non-Apple Owners. Port
Washington, New York, March 26, 2010.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. NY: Mcgraw-Hill.
OECD (2009). Responses to the Economic Crisis: Investing in Innovation for Long-Term Growth.
Oh, M. (1999). Service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer value: A holistic perspective. Hotel
Management, 18, 67-82.
Olson, J. C., & Jacoby, J. (1977). Consumer Response to Price: An Attitudinal, Information Processing
Perspective. In Y. Wind & M. G. Grenberg (Eds.), Moving Ahead with Attitude Research (pp. 73-86).
Chicago: America Marketing Association.
Ottenbacher, M., & Gnoth, J. (2005). How to develop successful hospitality innovation? Cornell Hotel and
Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 46(2), 205-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010880404271097
Ottman, J. A. (1999). Green Marketing: Opportunity for innovation, Chapter 2, Consumer with a conscience.
NTC: Contemporary Publishing Company. Retrieved From
http://www.greenmarketing.com/Green_Marketing_Book/Chapter02.html
Ottman, J. A., Stafford, E. R. & Hartman, C. L. (2006). Green marketing myopia. Environment, 48(5), 22-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/ENVT.48.5.22-36
98
Petrick, J. F. (2002). Development of multi-dimensional scale for measuring the perceived value of a service.
Journal of Leisure Research, 34(2), 119-134.
Petrick, J. F. (2004). First timers’ and repeaters’ perceived value. Journal of Travel Research, 43(1), 29-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047287504265509
Polonsky, M. J. (2011). Transformative green marketing: Impediments and opportunities. Journal of Business
Research, 64(12), 1131-1319. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.01.016
Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. NY: Free Press.
Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Green and competitive. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. In M. Wallendorf & P. F. Anderson (Eds.), Advances in
Consumer Research, 14(1), 208-212.
Ram, S. (1989). Successful innovation using strategies to reduce consumer resistance: An empirical test. Journal
of Product Innovation Management, 6(1), 20-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0737-6782(89)90011-8
Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions.
The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000002542
Rizwan, M., Aslam, A., Rahman, M., Ahmad, N., Sarwar, U., & Asghar, T (2013). Impact of green marketing on
purchase intention: An empirical study from Pakistan. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 3(2), 87-100.
Roberston, T. S. (1985). Consumer Behavior. Illinois: Scott and Fresman.
Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovation (3rd ed.). NY: The Free Press.
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovation (4th ed.). NY: The Free Press.
Roselius, T. (1971). Consumer rankings of risk reduction methods. Journal of Marketing, 35(1), 56-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1250565
Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor
analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, 517-522. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249590
Sheth, J. N. (1981). Psychology of innovation resistance. Research in Marketing, 4, 273-282.
Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Consumption Values and Market Choices: Theory and
Applications. Cincinnati. OH: Southwestern Publishing.
Shimp, T. A., & Bearden, W. O. (1982). Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers risk perception.
Journal of Consumer Research, 9, 38-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208894
Shiu, E., Hair, J., Bush, R., & Ortinau, D. (2009). Marketing Research. London: McGraw-Hill Higher Edition.
Shrivastava, P. (1994). Castrated environment: greening organization studies? Organization Studies, 15(5), 705.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069401500504
Simon, F. L. (1992). Marketing green products in the triad. The Columbia Journal of World Business, 268-285.
Steenkamp, J. B. (1990). Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, 22,
309-333. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(90)90019-A
Suter, T. A., & Hardesty, D. M. (2005). Maximizing earnings and price fairness perceptions in online
consumer-to-consumer auctions. Journal of Retailing, 81(4), 307-317.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2005.01.007
Swan, J. E., & Nolan, J. J. (1985). Gaining customer trust: A conceptual guide for the salesperson. Journal of
Personal Selling and Sales Management, 39-48.
Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale.
Journal of Retailing, 77, 203-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0
Sweeney, J. C., Soutar G. N., & Johnson, L. W. (1999). The role of perceived risk in the quality-value
relationship: A study in a retail environment. Journal of Retailing, 75(1), 77-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80005-0
Tam, L. M. (2004). Customer satisfaction, service quality and perceived value: An integrative model. Journal of
Marketing Management, 20(7), 897-917. http://dx.doi.org/10.1362/0267257041838719
Taylor, J. W. (1974). The role of risk in consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing, 38, 54-60.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1250198
99
TerraChoice Group Inc. (2009). The Seven Sins of Greenwashing. Summary Report North America.
TNS. (2008). Our Green World: An international survey covering 17 countries into how green we really are.
London: Kantar Group Company.
Tsai, D. C., & Lee, C. H. (1999). Relationships between Consumer Characteristics and Internet Shopping
Intention. Journal of Management, 16(4), 557-580.
Tsai, D. C., Lee, C. H., & Wu, W. Y. (2004). The effect of price, warranty and country-of-origin image on
product evaluation and purchasing intention. Journal of Management, 21(1), 21-46.
Tsai, M. T., Chuang , L. M., Chen, C. C., & Chao, H. M. (2010). The research on the relationship among service
innovation, normative evaluation, service quality and customer satisfaction-A case study of Taiwan
car-rental carrier. Journal of Quality, 17(3), 207-227.
Tsiotsou, R. (2006). The Role of perceived product quality and overall satisfaction on purchase Intentions.
International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(2), 207-217.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00477.x
Tu, J. C. (2002). Product Sustainable Design: Green Design in Theory and Practice. Taipei: Asiapac Books Pte
Ltd.
Weerawardena, J. (2003). The role of marketing capability in innovation-based competitive strategy. Journal of
Strategy Marketing, 11(1), 15-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0965254032000096766
Wood, C. M., & Scheer, L. K. (1996). Incorporating perceived into models of consumer deal assessment and
purchase intent. Advances in Consumer Research, 23(1), 399-404.
Yan, I. H., & Chang, Y. W. (2006). The Consumers Cognition of Green Package. Journal of Oriental Institute of
Technology, 26, 143-150.
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of
evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 2-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251446
Zeithaml, V. A., & Bitner, M. J. (2000). Services marketing. Boston: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
Copyrights
Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s), with first publication rights granted to the journal.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
100

Chen 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chen 2018

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chen 2018

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

International Journal of Marketing Studies; Vol. 6, No.

The Impact of Green Marketing and Perceived Innovation on

Grewal et al., 1998).

Figure 1. Research framework

3.2 Questionnaire Design

Table 1. Reliability and validity analysis—Energy-Saving Lamp

The cleaning effect of Energy-Saving Lamp will stronger 0.570 0.659

Table 2. Reliability and validity analysis—Environmental Cleanser

The cleaning effect of Environmental Cleanser will stronger 0.703 0.767

4.3 Structural Relationship Analysis

Figure 2. Relationship model of Energy-Saving Lamp

Figure 3. Relationship model of Environmental Cleanser

Table 3. The results of hypotheses test

Figure 4. Integration of the common path

4.4 Influence Effects of Each Aspect

Table 4. Analysis of influence effects of each variable

5. Conclusions and suggestions

You might also like