Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Written Assignment 4

    Uploaded by

    Bevine ambita
    The patricians and plebeians in ancient Rome had economic and political differences. The patricians were the aristocratic upper class who dominated political power to control the economy. Plebeians initially had few rights but gained more over time, such as the ability to hold public office. However, patricians still held most of the wealth and power.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Written Assignment 4

    Uploaded by

    Bevine ambita
    17 views3 pages
    The patricians and plebeians in ancient Rome had economic and political differences. The patricians were the aristocratic upper class who dominated political power to control the economy. Plebeians initially had few rights but gained more over time, such as the ability to hold public office. However, patricians still held most of the wealth and power.

    Original Title

    written assignment 4

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The patricians and plebeians in ancient Rome had economic and political differences. The patricians were the aristocratic upper class who dominated political power to control the economy. Plebeians initially had few rights but gained more over time, such as the ability to hold public office. However, patricians still held most of the wealth and power.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    17 views3 pages

    Written Assignment 4

    Uploaded by

    Bevine ambita
    The patricians and plebeians in ancient Rome had economic and political differences. The patricians were the aristocratic upper class who dominated political power to control the economy. Plebeians initially had few rights but gained more over time, such as the ability to hold public office. However, patricians still held most of the wealth and power.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE,

    HIST 1421

    WRITTEN ASSIGNMENT UNIT 4

    ECONOMIC AND POLITICAL DIFFERENCES 2

    Economic and Political Differences between Patricians and Plebeians

    The patricians and the plebeians made a unified effort in overthrowing the government of the kings.
    They had a collaborative method that would have warranted an equal share of the gains,
    opportunities, and benefits of achieving what they achieved. However, the story of the victories
    reflected a different actuality. In Roman society, the patricians were referred to as members of the
    aristocracy, who were the social upper class. The plebeians, on the other hand, were members of
    the general population in ancient Rome society.

    The rights possessed by a complete Roman citizen included rights of citizenships, which are divided
    into public and private rights. The lowest of the rank is the “commercium,” which was the right to
    property and contracts, and that meant that they could hold property and carry-on trade just like
    any other Roman citizen. There is also “connubium,” which was the right to a legal marriage with a
    patrician. The “suffragism” or the right of voting in the assemblages of the centuries and the tribes
    were given to them. Although “honores,” as troubling as it was, it is the right of holding office, but
    the patricians added terms and conditions to and placed restrictions on it. It was a complicated and
    roundabout way, making it a complex, almost impossible goal for the plebeians to achieve. Plebeians
    already gained great successes, but there was still something else for them to obtain in order for
    them to have uniformity in the state. Plebeians could be elected to lower offices of the appointed
    tribune of the people and aediles; however, they could not be elected to the high offices of the
    consuls and quaestors.

    Political power

    The patricians used political power to dominate economic power. Rome was a republic, but it was
    aristocratic but not a democratic republic. The leading powers were not in favor of the people but of
    the patrician class, who exercised it selfishly and oppressively. The land was Roman residents were
    split into two particular classes: the plebeians and the patricians or aristocrats. The aristocrats were
    the rich privileged individuals. Every other person was viewed as a plebeian. The patricians or
    aristocrats were the decision class of the early Roman Empire. Just certain families were essential for
    the aristocrat class and you must be conceived an aristocrat. The aristocrats were just a little level of
    the Roman populace, yet they held all the force (Morey, 1901). The wide range of various residents
    of Rome were Plebeians. Plebeians were the ranchers, skilled workers, workers, and warriors of
    Rome. In the beginning phases of Rome, the plebeians had not many rights. The entirety of the
    public authority and strict positions were held by patricians or aristocrats. The aristocrats made the
    laws, possessed the grounds, and were the officers over the military. Plebeians couldn't hold public
    office and were not permitted to wed aristocrats (Morey, 1901). Beginning around 494 BC, the
    plebeians started to battle contrary to the standard of the aristocrats. This battle is known as the
    "Contention of the Orders." Over the course of around 200 years, the plebeians acquired rights. They
    fought by taking to the streets. They would leave the city for some time, decline to work, or even
    decline to battle in the military. Ultimately, the plebeians acquired various rights including the option
    to campaign for office and wed aristocrats (Morey, 1901). One of the main concessions that the
    plebeians got from the aristocrats was the Law of the Twelve Tables. The Twelve Tables were laws
    that were posted in general society so anyone might see for themselves. They ensured some
    essential privileges of all Roman residents paying little heed to their social class (Morey, 1901).

    Ultimately the plebeians were permitted to choose their own administration authorities.They chose
    “tribunes” who addressed the plebeians and battled for their privileges. They had the ability to reject
    new laws from the Roman senate.

    As time went on, there became not many lawful contrasts between the plebeians and the
    aristocrats. The plebeians could be chosen for the senate and even be emissaries. Plebeians and
    aristocrats could likewise get hitched. Well-off plebeians turned out to be essential for Roman
    honorability. Nonetheless, notwithstanding changes in the laws, the aristocrats consistently held a
    larger part of the abundance and force in Ancient Rome. (Morey, 1901).

    The aristocrats and plebeians had a long history of hardship and conflict. The patricians, on the other
    hand, were supported by wealth, so they were lessinfluenced and hadthe option tounite more
    control over the plebeians.

    This underlines the way that in a battle, the economy or governmental issues can radically change
    the overall influence. Governmental issues, since aristocrats previously dreaded the despot ruler and
    depended on the plebeians for help due to their political clout. In any case, individuals who are
    generally influenced by clashes are the average citizens, while pioneers consistently appear to savor
    the battle and experience the least because of the expanded assets used to secure and defend the
    pioneers.

    References

    Morey, W. C. (1901). Outlines of Roman History. The Struggle Against the Kingship.
    http://www.forumromanum.org/history/morey06.html

    Morey, W. C. (1901). Outlines of Roman History. The Struggle for Economic Rights.
    http://www.forumromanum.org/history/morey07.html
    Morey, W. C. (1901). Outlines of Roman History. The Struggle for Political Equality.

    You might also like