Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    ІНЗ

    Uploaded by

    taras2235

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    ІНЗ

    Uploaded by

    taras2235
    5 views2 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    5 views2 pages

    ІНЗ

    Uploaded by

    taras2235

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    The joke that "a jury is made up of twelve people who choose who has

    the best lawyer" underscores the general sentiment about the jury
    system, suggesting that the outcome of a trial is often more influenced by
    the skills of the lawyers than by an objective assessment of the evidence.
    However, the question of whether jury trials are necessary is a complex
    and debated issue, with strong arguments both for and against.

    Arguments in favor of a jury trial:

    1. Involvement of the community: jury trials involve ordinary citizens in


    the judicial process, reinforcing the idea of a court of peers. This
    promotes community involvement and trust in the legal system.

    2. Diversity of views: jurors can bring a variety of experiences and


    perspectives to the courtroom. This can help ensure a more complete
    trial and potentially reduce bias.

    3. Checks and balances: juries act as checks on the government and


    prosecutors. They can prevent unfair convictions or excessive
    punishments and protect individual rights.

    Arguments against a jury trial:

    1. Legal incompetence: Jurors may lack legal knowledge, leading to


    misunderstandings or misinterpretation of complex cases. This can
    undermine the desire for justice.

    2.Bias and Prejudices: Jurors can be influenced by biases and prejudices,


    making it difficult to ensure a completely fair trial, especially in cases
    involving sensitive issues.

    3. Inconsistent outcomes: Jury decisions can be unpredictable, leading to


    inconsistent application of the law. This unpredictability can be
    problematic, especially in cases with serious consequences.

    In conclusion, in my opinion, while juries have their advantages in terms


    of community involvement and diversity of viewpoints, they are not
    without their drawbacks, including potential bias and legal incompetence.
    The effectiveness of jury trials depends on a well-functioning legal
    system, careful jury selection, and effective judicial oversight. Therefore,
    the question of whether we should have jury trials must be considered in
    the context of the particular legal system, the nature of the case, and the
    resources available for a fair and impartial trial.

    You might also like