TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page
Introduction 1
 Provincial Commodity Investment Plan 2
Plan Objectives 2
Chapter 1
1 Development Background/ Context 3-4
1.1 Geographic Profile
1.1.1 Provincial Location 4-8
1.1.2 Topography 8-22
1.1.3 Land Area 22-23
1.1.4 Land Classification 23-26
1.1.5 Land Suitability 27-39
1.1.6 Agricultural Area Disaggregated by Commodities 40-45
1.2 Agriculture and Agribusiness Profile
1.2.1 Agricultural Area 46
1.2.2 Strategic Agriculture and Fisheries Development Zone (SAFDZ) 46-47
1.2.3 Production Performance 48-57
1.2.4 Agribusiness 57-59
1.3 Socio Economic & Demographic Profile 60
Chapter II Development Vision, Mission and Development Direction
2.1 Over all Vision, Mission and Development Direction 11-1 -4
2.2 Agriculture Sector Vision and Goals 11-4-7
Chapter III Commodity Value Chain
3.1 Commodity Value Chain 1:Cacao Bean 111-cacao bean-1
3.1.1 Commodity Profile 111-cacao bean-2-6
3.1.2 Expanded Vulnerability & Sustainability Assessment of Cacaoin
Misamis Oriental 111-cacao bean-7-8
3.1.3 Cacao Industry Strategic Development Direction and Investment 111-cacao bean-9
Plan
3.1.4 PCIP Gap Matrix of Cacao Beans Value Chain in Misamis Oriental 111-cacao bean-10-34
3.2 Commodity Value Chain 2: Cardava Banana 111-banana-1
3.2.1 Priority Commodity Profile: Banana Cardava 111-banana-2-7
3.2.2 Commodity Strategic Development Direction & Investment Plan 111-banana-7-8
3.2.3 Expanded Vulnerability and Sustainability Analysis (EVSA) 111-banana-9-10
3.2.4 Risk Profiling for Banana (Cardava) Commodity 111-banana-11
3.2.5 Gap Matrix Banana Value Chain in Misamis Oriental 111-banana-12-31
3.3 Commodity Value Chain 3: Cassava 111-cassava-1
3.3.1 Commodity Profile 111-cassava-2-7
3.3.2 Expanded Vulnerability and Sustainability Assessment (EVSA) of
Cassava in Misamis Oriental 111-cassava-8-9
3.3.3 Investment Plan and Strategic Direction 111-cassava-10-11
3.3.4 Risk Profiling for Cassava Commodity 111-cassav-11
3.3.5 PCIP Commodity Investment Plan of Cassava Value Chain in
Misamis Oriental 111-cassava-12-25
3.4 Commodity Value Chain 4:Abaca 111-Abaca-1
3.4.1 Commodity Profile: Abaca 111-Abaca-1-6
3.4.2 Abaca Industry Strategic Development Direction and Investment
Plan 111-Abaca-6-7
3.4.3 Expanded Vulnerable Sustainability Assessment (EVSA) of Abaca 111-Abaca-7-9
3.4.4 Risk Profiling for Abaca Commodity 111-Abaca-10
3.4.5 PCIP Gap Matrix Abaca Fiber Value Chain of Misamis Oriental 111-Abaca-11-30
3.5 Commodity Value Chain 5: Coconut 111-Coconut- 1
3.5.1 Commodity Profile :Coconut 111-Coconut-2-12
3.5.2 Expanded Vulnerability Suitability Analysis (EVSA) for Coconut 111-Coconut-12-13
3.5.3 Coconut Commodity Strategic Development Strategic Direction and
Investment Plan 111-Coconut-14
3.5.4 PCIP Gap Matrix Coconut Value Chain in Misamis Oriental 111-Coconut-15-38
3.6 Commodity Value Chain: Mango 111-Mango-1
3.6.1 Commodity Profile 111-Mango-2-10
3.6.2 Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability Analysis (EVSA) of Mango 111-Mango-11-12
3.6.3 Mango Industry Strategic Development Direction and Investment 111-Mango-12-13
Plan
 3.6.4 PCIP Gap Matrix for Mango Value Chain in Misamis Oriental 111-Mango-14-15
3.7 Commodity Value Chain : Coffee 111-coffee-1
3.7.1 Commodity Profile 111-coffee-2-5
3.7.2 Commodity Industry Strategic Development Direction and
Investment Plan 111-coffee-5-6
3.7.3 Expanded Vulnerability Analysis (EVSA) for Coffee 111-coffee-6-7
3.7.4 PCIP Gap Matrix Green Coffee Value Chain in Misamis Oriental 111-coffee-8-23
3.8 Commodity Value Chain : Dairy Cattle 111 Dairy Milk-1
3.8-1 Commodity Profile 111 Dairy Milk -2-7
3.8.2 Expanded Vulnerability Analysis (EVSA) for Dairy Milk 111 Dairy Milk – 8-9
3.8.3 Commodity Strategic Development Strategic Direction and
Investment Plan 111 Dairy Milk -9-10
3.8.4 PCIP Gap Matrix Dairy Milk Product Value Chain in Misamis
Oriental 111 Dairy Milk -11-30
3.9 Commodity Value Chain 9: Swine Production 111 Swine – 1
3.9.1 Commodity Profile 111 Swine – 2-9
3.9.2 Swine Industry Strategic Development Direction & Investment Plan 111 Swine – 9-11
3.9.3 Expanded Vulnerability Analysis (EVSA) for Swine 111 Swine – 11-13
3.9.4 PCIP Gap Matrix Swine Product Value Chain in Misamis Oriental 111 Swine – 14-39
Chapter IV Institutional Arrangement for Philippine Rural Development Project
(PRDP) -Funding
4.1 Implementation Supervision IV-1
4.2 Organization and Management IV-1-20
Chapter V Memorandum of Agreement
List of Tables
1.1 Slope Classification by Province, region X in Hectares 9
1.2 Slope Category in Misamis Oriental, 2012 9-10
1.3 Slope Class by Municipality/City in Misamis Oriental 2007 10
1.4 Elevation Class by Province in Region X, 2007 12
1.5 List of Rivers in Misamis Oriental 19-20
1.6 List of Waterfalls by Municipality/City in Misamis Oriental 20-21
1.7 Land Area in Region X (Northern Mindanao) 2019 23
1.8 Total Land Area in Misamis Oriental by Municipality/City 23
1.9 Region X Land Classification by Province CY2017 24
1.10 Land Classification of Misamis Oriental by Municipality/City, 2017 25
1.11 Land Suitability for Settlement in Misamis Oriental 2013 27
1.12 Summary Report on Rapid Geo Hazard Assessment in Misamis
Oriental 29-31
1.13 City/Municipality by District Prone to Flood and Rain-Induced Land
Slide 35
1.14 Area Prone to Natural Hazards by Municipality/City in Misamis
Oriental 37
1.15 Summary of Areas Susceptible to Natural Hazards, Misamis
Oriental 38
1.16 Dominant Crops in Misamis Oriental CY2021 40
1.17 Production of the Different Commodities in Misamis Oriental
CY2018-2022 41-42
1.18 Total Road Network by Length by Surface Condition and Density by
Municipalities /Cities, Misamis Oriental 2019 42-43
1.19 Total Road Network by ClassificationLength and Condition in
Misamis Oriental 43
1.2.1 Total Agricultural Area of Misamis Oriental by Municipalities/Cities 46
1.2.2 Strategic Agricultural and Fishery Development Zone Area Misamis
Oriental 47
1.2.3 Palay Production (In MT), Area Harvested (Hectares) and Yield
(Mt/Hectare) Misamis Oriental Annual 2018 to 2022 49
1.2.4 Corn Production ( in MT) Area Harvested (Has.), by Province
CY2021 49
1.2.5 Corn Production (In MT) Area Harvested (Has.) Misamis Oriental,
Annual from 2018-2022 50
1.2.6 High Value Crops Production in Misamis Oriental 2018-2022 51-52
1.2.7 Comparative Data of Livestock & Poultry Inventory in Misamis
Oriental from 2016-2020 53
1.2.8 Livestock and Poultry Production Volume (MT, live weight), Misamis
Oriental from 2016-2020 53
1.2.9 Chicken Inventory by Type (No. of heads) Misamis Oriental from
2016-2020 54
1.2.10 Inventory of Livestock & Poultry by Type of Farm (No. of heads),
Misamis Oriental, from 2016-2020 54
1.2.11 Animal Slaughtered in Abattoirs Dressing Plant ( No. of heads) by
Type of Animals, Misamis Oriental from 2016-2020 55
1.2.12 Fish Production by Type of Production (MT), Misamis Oriental from
2020 to 2nd Quarter of 2022 55
1.2.13 Registered Boats in Misamis Oriental 2017-2021 56
1.2.14 Registered Fisherfolks in Misamis Oriental from 2017-2021 56-57
1.2.15 Different Products Produced in Misamis Oriental Already in the
Market 58-59
1.3.1 Misamis Oriental Total Population 2020 by Municipality/City 60
1.3.2 Population, No. of Household, No. of Farming Household, No. of
Fisherfolks & Non-Farming Household of Misamis Oriental 61-62
1.3.3 Labor Force and Employment Status, Region X from 2020- 2021 62
1.3.4 Labor Force and Employment Status, by Province and HUC in 2021 63
1.3.5 Labor Force in Agriculture Sector of Misamis Oriental 63
1.3.6 Subsistence Incidence and Magnitude of Subsistence Poor Families
Province: , Philippines, Region X, Province: 2018-2022 64
1.3.7 Subsistence Incidence and Magnitude of Subsistence Poor Families,
Philippines, Region, Province: 2018-2021 64
1.3.8 Monthly Poverty and Food Threshold (for Family of five), Philippines,
Region X, Province: 2018 to 2021 65
1.3.9 Poverty Incidence and Magnitude of Poor Population, Region X: 2015,
2018 and 2021 65
1.3.10 Poverty Incidence and Ranking by Municipality/City, Misamis Oriental:
2018 66
1.3.11 Number of Families, Total and Average Annual Family Income and
Expenditure, Region X, 2018 66
1.4.1 Monthly Rainfall (MM), Misamis Oriental, from 2011 to 2021 67
3.1.1 Area Planted/Harvested for Cacao 2018-2022 (in Hectares) 111-Cacao Beans- 4
3.1.2 Volume of Production for Cacao 2018-2022 (in MT) 111-Cacao Beans-5
3.1.3 Average Yield Cacao 2018-2022 (Mt/Ha) 111-Cacao Beans-5
3.1.5 Existing Expansion Area of Cacao with Production (MT) by
Municipality/City CY2022 in Misamis Oriental 111-Cacao Beans-5-6
3.1.2.1 Expanded Vulnerability and Sustainability Analysis (EVSA)
Computation Results of Cacao in Misamis Oriental 111-Cacao Beans-7
3.2.1 Area Harvested of Cardava Banana (Hectares) 111-Banana-5
3.2.2 Volume of Production of Cardava Banana (MT) 111-Banana-5
3.2.3 Average Yield of Cardava Banana (MT/Hectare) 111-Banana-5
3.2.4 Existing and Expansion Area Plus Production Performance of
Cardava Banana by Municipality /City of Misamis Oriental CY2022 111-Banana-6
3.2.5 LGU Ranking Base on Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability
Analysis (EVSA) of Banana in Misamis Oriental 111-Banana-9
3.2.6 Value Chain Segment, Major & Risk Mitigation or Adaptation
Measures 111-Banana-11
3.3.1 Area Harvested of Cassava (hectare) 111-Cassava-5
3.3.2 Volume of Production of Cassava (MT) 111-Cassava-5
3.3.3 Average Yield of Cassava (MT/Hectare) 111-Cassava-5

Title Page

3.3.4 Existing/Expansion Area, Production Performance of Cassava per

Municipality/City in Misamis Oriental CY2022 111-Cassava-6-7
3.3.5 Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability Analysis (EVSA) of Cassava
in Misamis Oriental 111-Cassava-8
3.3.6 Risk and Mitigating /Adoption Measures 111-Cassava-11
3.4.1 Volume of Production of Abaca (MT) by Cluster 111-Abaca-3
3.4.2 Volume of Production of Abaca (MT) in the Philippine, Northern
Mindanao & Misamis Oriental from 2018-2022 111-Abaca-3
3.4.3 Area Planted/Harvested of Abaca (Hectare) 2018-2022 111-Abaca-4
3.4.4 Average Yield of Abaca (MT/Hectare) 111-Abaca-4
3.4.5 Existing Area Planted/Harvested and Production of Abaca 2022 by
Municipality/City Plus Expansion Area of Abaca in Misamis Oriental 111-Abaca-5
3.4.6 Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability Analysis (EVSA) of Abaca in
Misamis Oriental 111-Abaca-8
3.5.1 Area Planted /Harvested of Coconut in the Country /Northern
Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental 111-Coconut-2
3.5.2 Production Performance of the Country /Northern Mindanao/
Misamis Oriental 111-Coconut-2
3.5.3 Average Production of Coconut in the Philippines/ Northern
Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental 111-Coconut-3
3.5.4 Population, Poverty Incidence, Area Harvested, No. of Farmers
Engaged, Production Cy2022 and Expansion Area in Coconut of 111-Coconut- 3
Misamis Oriental by Municipalities/Cities
3.5.5 Comparison of Coco Sugar & Refined Sugar Nutrient Composition 111-Coconut-8
3.5.6 Table Showing the Results of EVSA for Coconut in Misamis Oriental 111-Coconut-12-13
3.6.1 Common Varieties and its Characteristic of Mango 111-Mango-2
3.6.2 Area Planted/ Harvested of Mango in the Philippines /Northern
Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental 2018-2022 (in Hectares) 111-Mango-5
3.6.3 Volume of Mango Production in the Philippine/ Northern Mindanao/
Misamis Oriental (in MT) 111-Mango-5
3.6.4 Average Yield/ Hectare of Mango in the Philippines /Northern
Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental ( in MT/Hectare) 111-Mango-5
3.6.5 Population, Poverty Incidence, Area Harvested, No. of Farmers
Engaged and Production CY2022 of Mango in Misamis Oriental by 111-Mango-6
Municipality/City
3.6.6 BPI Accredited Mango Nursery Operators in Mindanao 111-Mango-8
3.6.7 Buyers Preferred Supply Areas 111-Mango-10
3.6.8 Results of EVSA for Mango in Misamis Oriental 111-Mango-11
3.7.1 Area Planted/ Harvested of Coffee in the Philippines / Northern
Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental 2018-2022 ( in Hectares) 111-Coffee-3
3.7.2 Volume of Production of Coffee in the Philippines/ Northern
Mindanao / Misamis Oriental (in MT) 111-Coffee-3
3.7.3 Average Production in the Philippines / Northern Mindanao/ Misamis
Oriental CY2018-2022 (in MT) 111-Coffee-4
3.7.4 Population, Poverty Incidence, Area Harvested, No. of Farmers
Engaged, Production CY2022 and Area Expansion in Coffee of
Misamis Oriental by Municipal/City
3.7.5 EVSA Results of Coffee in Misamis Oriental 111-Coffee-4
3.8.1 Milk Production (MT) in the Philippines, Northern Mindanao,
Misamis Oriental CY2017-2022 111-Dairy Milk- 6
3.8.2 Milk Production (MT) in Misamis Oriental CY2022 111-Dairy Milk-6-7
3.9.1 Number of Swine, Selected Countries (in 1000 heads) 2029-2022 111-Swine-2
3.9.2 Inventory of Swine in the Philippines 2017-2022 111-Swine-3
3.9.3 Swine Inventory of Northern Mindanao 2017-2022 111-Swine-4
3.9.4 Swine Inventory Misamis Oriental 2017-2022 111-Swine-4
3.9.5 Hog Production, Carcass Weigth Equipment (in 1000 MT) 2019-
2022 111-Swine-5
3.9.6 Total Consumption Carcass Weight Equivalent (in 1000 MT) 2019-
2022 111-Swine-5
3.9.7 Volume of Hog Production, by Region 2018-2022 111-Swine-6
3.9.8 Volume of Hog Production in Misamis Oriental in Misamis Oriental
Per Misamis Oriental CY2022 111-Swine-8
3.9.9 The Results of EVSA Computation for Swine Production in Misamis
Oriental 111-Swine-11-12
LIST OF FIGURES
1.1 Regional Location Map of Northern Mindanao 5
1.2 Map of Misamis Oriental 6
1.3 Slope Map of Misamis Oriental 11
1.4 Elevation Map of Misamis Oriental 12
1.5 Soil Map of Misamis Oriental 16
1.6 Land Classification Map of Misamis Oriental 26
1.7 Map Index Land Resources Evaluation & Suitability Assessment of
Strategic Production Area of Misamis Oriental 28
1.8 Geo Hazards Map in Misamis Oriental 32
1.9 Erosion Map in Misamis Oriental 34
1.10 Rain Induced Land Slide Map of Misamis Oriental 36
1.11 Multi-Hazard Map in Misamis Oriental 39
1.12 Road Net Work Map of Misamis Oriental 44
1.13 Local Road Net Work Leading to Commodities in Misamis Oriental 45
1.2.1 SAFDZ Map of Misamis Oriental 48
.3.1.1 Share of Cacao Production in Mindanao by Region (MT) CY2021 111-Cacao Bean-4
3.1.2 Commodity Map of Cacao in Misamis Oriental 111-Cacao Bean-6
3.1.3 EVSA Map of Cacao in Misamis Oriental 111-Cacao Bean-8
3.2.1 VCA Map of Cardava Banana 111-Banana-4
3.2.2 Commodity Map of Cardava Banana in Misamis Oriental 111-Banana-7
3.2.3 EVSA Map of Banana in Misamis Oriental 111-Banana-10
3.3.1 Value Chain Map of Cassava 111-Cassava-3
3.3.2 Cassava Production in Mindanao by Region 111-Cassava-4
3.3.3 Commodity Map of Cassava in Misamis Oriental 111-Cassava-7
3.3.4 EVSA Map of Cassava in Misamis Oriental 9
3.4.1 Volume of Production and Area Planted for Abaca in the Philippines
2017-2021 111-Abaca-2
3.4.2 Distribution of Production for Abaca by Region, Philippine 2021 111-Abaca-2
3.4.3 Commodity Map of Abaca in Misamis Oriental 111-Abaca-6
3.4.4 EVSA Map of Abaca in Misamis Oriental 111-Abaca-9
3.5.1 Commodity map of Coconut in Misamis Oriental 111-Coconut-4
3.5.2 Coconut Value Chain in region X 111-Coconut-5
3.5.3 Value Chain Analysis of Coconut Meat in Region X 111-Coconut-6
3.5.4 VCA of Young Meat in Region X 111-Coconut-6
3.5.5 VCA of Coconut Shell in Region X 111-Coconut-7
3.5.6 VCA of Coconut Husk in Region X 111-Coconut-7
3.5.7 VCA of Coconut Sap Region X 111-Coconut-9
3.5.8 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut Farm 111-Coconut-9
3.5.9 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut Farm Semi-
Integrated Processing Enterprise 111-Coconut-10
3.5.10 Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut Farm with Fertilizer and
Well Manage Farm Plus Engaged in Semi-Processing 111-Coconut-10
3.5.11 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut Farm for Young
Coconuts 111-Coconut-11
3.5.12 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut Farm for Coco
Sugar Industry 111-Coconut-11
3.5.13 VCA Income Generated – From 1 Hectare Coconut Farm 111-Coconut-12
3.6.1 Summary of Major Constraints, Proposed Inventory and Desired
Results in Every Segment of the Value Chain 111-Mango-4
3.6.2 Commodity Map of Mango in Misamis Oriental 111-Maango-7
3.6.3 Marketing Channel of Fresh Mango 111-Mango-8
3.6.4 Value Chain Development Map of Fresh Mango 111-Mango-10
3.6.5 EVSA Map of Mango in Misamis Oriental 111-Mango-11
3.7.1 Percent Share of Production, Mindanao by Region 111-Coffee-2
3.7.2 Commodity Map of Coffee in Misamis Oriental 111-Coffee-3
3.7.3 EVSA Map of Coffee in Misamis Oriental 111-Coffee-7
3.8.1 Dairy Production (MT) in the Philippines (2017-2021) 111-Dairy Milk-2
3.8.2 Utilization of Raw Milk 111-Dairy Milk-5
3.8.3 Commodity Map of Dairy Cattle in Misamis Oriental 111-Dairy Milk-8
3.8.4 EVSA Map of Dairy Cattle in Misamis Oriental 111-Dairy Milk-9
3.9.1 Commodity Map for Hog Production in Misamis Oriental 111-Swine-9
3.9.2 EVSA Map of Swine in Misamis Oriental 111-Swine-13
4.1 Organizational Structure for the Implementation of PRDP in the
Province of Misamis Oriental
ANNEXES
1 Executive Order No. 2014-003 Series of 2014 6-11
2 Executive Order No. 069 issued by Governor Peter M. Unabia 12-20
creating the PPMIU of Misamis Oriental
Misamis oriental
Provincial Investment Plan (2023-2026)

Introduction

In 2014 a MOA was forged between the Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP) and PLGU Misamis Oriental signifies
the intent of the province to participate the PRDP. Thus, Gingoog City, Salay and Initao were able to avail I-BUILD project
specifically farm to market road project. Gingoog City the Agay-ayan MPC and Northern Mindanao Federation of Dairy
Cooperative (NMFDC) of El Salvador City was able to avail under I-REAP component enhancing their enterprise, Agay-ayan
MPC expanded their Coco Sugar Processing and Marketing Enterprise while NMFDC is enhancing of their dairy milk
processing by increasing the self-life of their product from one week to one month.

The Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP) is a 6-year national government platform for an inclusive, value-chain
oriented, and climate resilient agriculture and fisheries sector. Aims to increase rural incomes and enhance fishery productivity
in 16 regions and 80 provinces and make the agriculture and fishery sector more market-oriented and climate-resilient. PRDP
will partner with the LGUs and private sector in providing key infrastructure, facilities, technology and information that will raise
incomes, productivity and competitiveness in the countryside.

Specifically, the project seeks to achieve at least 5 percent increase annual real household incomes of farmer beneficiaries,
30 percent increase in incomes of beneficiaries involved with enterprise development; 7 percent increase in value of annual
marketed output; and 20 percent increase in the number of farmers and fishers with improved access to the services of DA.

It is the upscale version of PRDP 1 where new innovations and strategy are introduced to address the present demand of
times especially climate change to make rural development more effective. The project is jointly funded by the World Bank,
National Government and the Local Government Units.

The new Administration pronounces to support the project by providing LGU equity of the Municipality once they will avail
PRDP. So with that several MLGUs of the province signify their intent to participate with the project. The Governor encourage
MLGUs/Farmers/Fisherfolks to participate the PRDP because he believes that PRDP will increase and improve agri-
development thrust by developing and sustaining interventions to deliver the necessary infrastructure, facilities and related
services especially to farmer/fishery beneficiaries. Thus, the province partnered with DA Region 10 and city/municipal LGUs is
updating the PCIP which is one of the required documents to avail the projects under the PRDP.

Provincial Commodity Investment Plan (PCIP)

It is a 3-year rolling consensus plan between the DA and PLGU based on the value chain analyses of the commodities
conducted with strong participation of the various stakeholders in the chain.

PCIP is one of the major components of PRDP. It is a strategic plan that rationalizes the interventions within the various
segments of the value chain of commodities that are of significance to the province namely cacao, coconut (coco sugar, coco
sauce, coco coir, coco oil), banana (lakatan and cardava), coffee, abaca, cassava, lanzones, fresh mango, carcass swine,
dairy cattle and chevon that will contribute to the national goals of the agriculture and fishery sectors. It is important to note
that the preparation of the PCIP is largely informed by the results of the Value Chain Analyses (VCA) of each of the above
commodities as well as from broad-based consultations made by the Provincial Core Planning Team with the various
stakeholders of the plan and of the PRDP as a whole.

The VCA informs the PCIP relative to the key gaps/constraint in the value chain development of the above-mentioned
commodities. It suggests interventions that are necessary to be made available within the value chain to address key gaps
and constraints. Inputs elicited from various stakeholders ranging from LGUs of the province to the private sector make up the
essential components of the PCIP.

Misamis Oriental updated PCIP covering the planning period 2023-2026 shall become the basis for identifying
interventions/sub-projects under the PRDP’s I-BUILD and I-REAP components. Therefore, it is imperative that interventions
which are to be co-financed by the LGUs and the DA through the PRDP are identified in the PCIP.
The PCIP can be a living document that outlines the agri-fishery priority and direction of the province, the same document can
serve as basis in determining the investment needs of the province for its agricultural and fisheries sector in general. It will be
the basis for PRDP’s I-BUILD & I-REAP in selecting eligible interventions / sub-projects for funding.

Plan Objectives

1. Identify and prioritize interventions for possible co-financing between implementing Local Government Units and the
Department of Agriculture through the PRDP

2. Lay-out implementation and supervision arrangement (for sub-projects)

3. Identify strategies for an effective monitoring and evaluation mechanism

4. Directly support the objectives of the PDPFP particular on the province’s development thrust by developing and
maintaining/sustaining selected interventions relative to the value chain development of each identified commodity.

Chapter 1. Development Background/Context

The Province of Misamis Oriental, with its capital city, Cagayan de Oro, is the gateway to Northern Mindanao because of its
strategic location. As a regional center, the province supports a large population, which are linked to important inland resource
bases, a springboard for intensified economic activity and expanding suburbia. This convergence point of Northern Mindanao
is home to several major industries, ports and other infrastructure facilities that spur the agro-manufacturing, trade and
services economy of the area.

The province occupies a total land area of 3,131.52 square kilometres (1,209.09 sq mi). When Cagayan de Oro City is
included for geographical purposes, the province's land area is 3,544.32 square kilometres (1,368.47 sq mi). The province has
a total agricultural area of 236,627 hectares or 67% of its total land.

Despite Misamis Oriental’s industrial advantage over other provinces, still the agricultural sector, in various degrees, feed such
industries; thus, the importance of continuing investments and technical support to agriculture and agri-and agro-based
industries. Not only the industries, but new market opportunities are on the horizon, as new infrastructure improve viability
and bring to the fore potential commodities and products for promotion and expansion.

The establishment of support infrastructure that promotes external access and internal integration greatly contributes to
improving and expanding services in all areas, as well as in promoting resiliency in the agri-fishery industry sector.

Thus, the new Administration envisions addressing all its efforts gears towards the following key development issues of the
province:

 High Poverty Incidence

In CY-2018 the province recorded a poverty incidence of 11.4%. However, in 2022 the province poverty incidence
increases to 32.4% as a result of COVID pandemic. Hence, with the present Administration envision reducing poverty
incidence to single digit from 31% to 9% after 3 years.

 High unemployment rate

Even if Misamis Oriental is highly urbanize province in the region and it is an agri-industrial province where several
industries are located and more job opportunities are offered the province recorded a drops from 89.45% to 87.85%
rate for CY2022. It’s because most of the graduates doesn’t fit with the available job vacancies of the company.
Thus, with the scholarship and entrepreneurial program unemployment rate will be reducing.

 High population growth

 Although the population growth of the province is only 1.6 % annually recorded by PSA last CY2021 but, it means
that we must produce more foods to cop up the increasing needs of the population. Thus, it’s a big challenge on how
to insure the food security in as much as our agricultural area is decreasing because some agricultural land is
converted to other purposes and our marine resources are depleted. Population growth rate will also lead to climate
vulnerability.

 High Malnutrition among school children

The nutritional statuses among school children, 26.5% are under weight, 6.2% wasted, 25.6% stunted 6.1% over
weight. Under weight, wasted and stunted belongs to poor families and overweight belongs to non-poor household.
Nutritional status among school children is very important to produce quality graduates find a jobs that lessen
unemployment and poverty.

 Challenges in agriculture and fishery sector

 Low farmers / fisherfolks income because of the following elements:

-The physical resources are, there are land degradation due to deforestation that leads to flooding, soil erosion, air
and water pollution that increases generation of solid waste and urban encroachment and resource use conflict.

-On economy low income because of low productivity due to high cost of inputs, lack of quality seeds, planting
materials, quality livestock and poultry stocks, lack of labor services especially during land preparation and
harvesting, low/unstable market price of agri products, limited access to the market, unpredictable weather condition
that leads to diseases infestation, marketing were monopolize by middle men, lack of capital and lack of
entrepreneurial skills. To lessen the gaps more agri-tourism investment are needed.

- Infrastructure, transportation and access, inappropriate/ insufficient farm equipment, machineries, post-harvest
facilities, inaccessible farm to market road, lack access to water both potable and irrigation purposes and lack of
processing centers.

1.1 Geographical Profile

1.1.1 Provincial Location

The Province of Misamis Oriental, with its capital city, Cagayan de Oro, is the gateway to Northern Mindanao because of its
strategic location. As a regional center, the province supports a large population, which are linked to important inland resource
bases, a springboard for intensified economic activity and expanding suburbia. This convergence point of Northern Mindanao
is home to several major industries, ports and other infrastructure facilities that spur the agro-manufacturing, trade and
services economy of the area. It is surrounded by the land-locked province of Bukidnon to the south which has a vast
agricultural production area and by Iligan City on the west, which is host to several heavy industries. Further west is Lanao del
Norte with its vast production areas and rich coastal resources; and finally on the north is the island province of Camiguin, the
region’s tourism hub. (Fig. 1.1 Map of Northern Mindanao)
 Figure 1.1 Regional Location Map of
Northern Mindanao
The province is subdivided into 23 municipalities and 2 component cities. Cagayan de Oro City is a highly urbanized city that
is geographically within the province but governs itself independently from it (Fig. 2 Map of Misamis Oriental).

Misamis Oriental has two (2) Congressional Districts. The First Congressional District comprises the municipalities from
Magsaysay to Balingasag, including the component City of Gingoog, while the Second Congressional District includes the
municipalities from Jasaan to Lugait, the landlocked municipality of Claveria, the new City of El Salvador and the City of
Cagayan de Oro. Further, Cagayan de Oro, which is the seat of government of the province has also two Congressional
Districts, namely, District 3A - comprising the barangays in the western side of the city and District 3B - with those barangays
in the eastern side using the long stretch of Cagayan de Oro River as demarcation line.
 Figure 1.2 Map of Misamis Oriental

As a development strategy, the adjacent municipalities/cities in the province have been clustered into different growth areas.
Development/Municipal clusters or inter-municipal groupings were organized to work together for common socio-economic
objectives. These clusters identified the important roles each area would play for sustainable development of the province.

MANLUNA – Manticao, Lugait, Naawan

▪ Agri-industrial development
▪ Center for research on marine conservation and aqua production
▪ Eco-tourism
GALILEO – Gitagum, Alubijid, Laguindingan, Initao, Libertad, El Salvador, Opol

▪ Agri-industrial development
▪ Eco-tourism
▪ Abundant and cheap supply of manpower
▪ Agricultural Basket
▪ Bulk supplier of industrial inputs and finished industrial products for the country
▪ Site of an international standard airport that arises of the sub-cluster
It created a sub cluster the AGILA – Alubijid, Gitagum, Laguindingan

▪ Laguindingan Airport Development Project Impact Zone (Aeropolis)

The Laguindingan Airport Development Project Impact Zone shall become the newest and most modern transportation hub in
the SDA. It spans across three coastal municipalities in Misamis Oriental with the Laguindingan Airport being at the cluster’s
core. It is expected to become a key economic node catalyzing local economic development and generate employment with
the establishment of support systems such as transport services to and from the airport, and tourism and recreational
services. This facility can trigger the birth of the Aerotropolis a new urban form whose layout, infrastructure and economy are
centered on the airport and its connectivity. The aerotropolis could stretch up to 30 km outward from the airport, with
businesses and economic activities also being drawn to Laguindingan’s adjacent municipalities. Services supporting business
and trade could also spawn here complementing the more established support services in metro CDO. Major challenges
usually include environmental problems and congestion. Current issues include, among others, inadequate and not
sustainable potable water, and power supply to support the long-term operational requirement of the airport, absence of
sanitary landfill and drainage.

CLAJAVITA – Claveria, Jasaan, Villanueva, Tagoloan

▪ Agri-industrial development
▪ Agricultural basket
 ▪ Eco-tourism

Misamis Ecozones - shall continue to be main center for industrial development in the province and shall host most of the
heavy and medium-scale industries in the SDA of the region as its core is the PHIVIDEC Industrial Estate (PIE), located in
Tagoloan and Villanueva. The PIE, whose radius extends to the special economic zone in Jasaan, is an ideal industrial and
processing destination as it is situated at around 25 km northeast of CDO.

Notable investments in the KDZ, among others, are the Mindanao Container Terminal (MCT) and the 210-MW Coal-Fired
Mindanao Power Plant (STEAG Power Incorp.) The MCT, a modern, high-capacity container terminal, is built to provide the
region with a cost-efficient means of transporting agricultural and industrial goods within the country and internationally. Its
operation not only boosts the international shipping industry in the region but also promotes economic growth via increases in
industry locators which bring more employment and other investment opportunities. The full utilization of the MCT, and the
realization of the Mindanao Railway System (MRS) or other appropriate transportation solution, shall cement the role of the
region as the leading transshipment hub in Mindanao.

The STEAG coal-fired power plant, on the other hand, is established to augment the supply of electricity in the region and
avert potential power shortages in the short-to-medium term with the entry of more industries.

Population growth in the area will be fueled both by the high value processing activities taking place in its core and adjacent
communities, as well as from the growth of settlements in the periphery or outlying areas. Population growth together with
climate change impact on its environment are compelling factors for urban (re) development and planning to become a priority
cooperative task of the LGUs comprising the area to realize an orderly development of settlements and create livable
communities. Identified hazard risks such as flooding will be a priority concern in policy reforms and program planning.

An appropriate urban development model will have to be adopted to avert urban sprawl and attendant ills which have
characterized the country’s first metropolitan areas. Major urbanization concerns already felt in recent years in the area’s
urban centers, such as traffic congestion, proliferation of blighted and slum areas, poor sanitation (lack of solid waste and
wastewater disposal) will be top priority action agenda. Specific approaches to the implementation of programs and projects
need to be carefully laid out to achieve the most efficient integration of economic functions and widest access to social
services.

MISORET – Balingasag, Lagonglong, Salay, Binuangan, Sugbongcogon, Kinoguitan

 Producer of grains and high value fruits and vegetables

▪ Center of environment-friendly light industries
▪ Marine and inland fish production
▪ Eco-tourism haven
▪ Plantation of palm oil, pryce gas, concentration of filling materials, mariculture, the largest areas, the
greatest number of barangays

GINGOOG BAY AREA – Balingoan, Medina, Talisayan, Gingoog City, Magsaysay

 Eco-tourism haven arising the Gingoog-Camiguin Adventure Tourism Loop

▪ Fishery development
▪ Producer of high value crops and cut flowers
▪ Marine and inland fish production
▪ In addition to the clustering of municipalities/cities, Macajalar Bay Development Alliance is another cluster
covering from the municipality of Laguindingan to Cagayan de Oro City to municipality of Kinoguitan. The
major objective of their unity is a coastal bay preservation and development.

1.1.2 Topography

 Slope

In Region X, Misamis Oriental ranks 2nd to Bukidnon for areas within the 0-8 percent slope. Most of the low-lying areas in the
province are prone to flooding. The province also ranks 2nd to Lanao del Norte in terms of areas within the 8-18% slope category
or areas which ranges from undulating to rolling. The province’s area with slopes greater than 50 percent or areas which are very
steep and mountainous constituted only 6 percent of the region’s total land area. These areas are prone to landslides.
 TABLE NO. 1.1: SLOPE CLASSIFICATION BY PROVINCE, REGION X, IN HECTARES

PROVINCE 0-3% 3-8% 8-18% 18-30% 30-50% >50% TOTAL

Bukidnon 111,516.00 72,627.00 75,465.00 106,366.00 136,110.00 547,775.00 1,049,859.00
Camiguin 2,362.00 3,759.00 5,382.00 3,744.00 13,940.00 - 29,187.00
Lanao del 40,092.41 38,748.93 84,344.61 92,331.06 51,587.56 75,374.10 382,478.66
Norte
Misamis 32,287.00 40,044.00 26,836.00 31,762.00 19,183.00 55,410.00 205,522.00
Occidental
Misamis 46,336.00 51,111.00 77,041.00 87,251.00 48,315.00 41,516.00 351,570.00
Oriental
Total 216,986.84 216,946.38 267,028.64 321,486.37 274,057.86 722,110.57 2,018,616.66
Percent 21.35% 23.56% 28.85% 27.14% 17.63% 5.75% 17.42%
Share of the
Province to
Region X’s
Total
SOURCE: RPFP, 2004-2030

The topography of Misamis Oriental is generally uneven, occupied by mountain ranges with narrow coastal plains, numerous rivers,
and valleys. The eastern portion consists of sharp angular hills divided by streams and deep gorges, long coastline bordered with
two major bays, namely: Macajalar Bay and Gingoog Bay and sloping lowlands and river between canyons. In the western part,
rough hills rise while the coastal lowlands are crossed by several rivers, streams, and creeks. The province’s land slope is
categorized into six groups as shown in Table No. 1.2.2.

The greater portion of the province’s total land area comprising of 87,251 hectares or 24.82 percent is within the 18-30 percent
slope range. These areas which are categorized as rolling to hilly are suitable for Agro forest and other related activities. The 8-18
percent slope which covers an area of 77,041 hectares or 21.91 percent of the province’s total area are categorized as undulating to
rolling and are appropriate for agricultural development particularly seasonal to permanent crops. The 0-3 and 3-8 percent slopes
cover an aggregated area of 97,447 hectares or 27.72 percent of the province’s total land area are categorized as level to very
gently sloping to undulating, are highly suitable for settlements, agricultural, industrial, and other related uses. The 30-50 and more
than 50 percent slopes which are categorized as hilly to mountainous and very steep areas cover a total area of 89,831 hectares or
25.55 percent of the province’s total land area. These areas should be reserved and protected for forest

TABLE NO. 1.2: SLOPE CATEGORY IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL, 2012

RANGE DESCRIPTION USES AREA % SHARE TO TOTAL LAND

(%) (Hectare) AREA
0-3 Level to very gently Irrigable and highly suitable for 46,336 13.18
sloping agricultural, urban, industrial,
and other related uses
3-8 Gently sloping to 51,111 14.54
undulating
8-18 Undulating to rolling Agricultural development; 77,041 21.91
Seasonal to permanent crops
18-30 Rolling to hilly Limited for agricultural 87,251 24.82
development; Suitable for
crops requiring tillage
RANGE DESCRIPTION USES AREA % SHARE TO TOTAL LAND
(%) (Hectare) AREA
30-50 Hilly to mountainous Reserved for forest trees 48,315 13.74
>50 Very steep Reserved and protected as 41,516 11.81
forest cover
TOTAL 351,570 100.00
SOURCE: RPFP, 2004-2030
Slope 0-18% is areas suitable for agricultural uses, 18-50% areas suitable for industrial crops and forest trees. In Misamis
Oriental, has the total of 187,865.2 hectares slope of 0-18% and 110,507.3 hectares slope of 18-50%..

The cities of Gingoog (25,011.4 hectares) and Cagayan de Oro (23,897.1 hectares) and municipalities of Claveria (19,557.0
hectares) and Opol (12,149.0 hectares) have larger areas with slope ranging from 0-18 percent which are highly suitable for
agricultural uses, urban development, as well as for agri-industrial and agro-forestry development.
For 18-50% slope large areas is located in Claveria, Cagayan de Oro and Gingoog City, area still suitable for agri-industrial and
agro-forest development. It is where water shed areas is situated. Large areas with slopes more than 50 percent are found in the
municipality of Claveria (17,846.5 hectares) and in the city of Gingoog (15,632.1 hectares).

TABLE NO. 1.3: SLOPE CLASS BY MUNICIPALITY/CITY IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL, 2007

MUNICIPALITY/ 0-18% SLOPE 18-50% SLOPE >50% SLOPE TOTAL LAND (HAS.)
CITY
Alubijid 6,880.6 2,864.0 600.4 10,345
Balingasag 7,207.9 4,215.4 3,287.7 14,711
Balingoan 3,523.9 1,702.9 553.2 5,780
Binuangan 2,248.9 794.1 0.0 3,043
Claveria 19,557.0 20,559.5 17,846.5 57,963
Gitagum 3,753.8 586.2 0.0 4,340
Initao 6,210.2 4,514.7 402.1 11,127
Jasaan 4,654.4 2,894.5 153.1 7,702
Kinoguitan 3,555.0 632.0 69.0 4,256
Lagonglong 5,805.9 1,992.3 579.8 8,378
Laguindingan 1,439.4 234.57 0.0 1,674
Libertad 2,243.3 3.7 0.0 2,247
Lugait 1,214.0 1,531.0 0.0 2,745
Magsaysay 10,083.0 4,231.0 0.0 14,314
Manticao 5,704.0 2,046.0 4,551.0 12,301
Medina 6,981.7 2,056.9 5,790.4 14,829
Naawan 8,329.8 520.2 0.0 8,850
Opol 12,149.0 5128.4 235.6 17,513
Salay 2,093.5 6,460.2 725.3 9,279
Sugbongcogon 2,227.5 122.7 299.8 2,650
Tagoloan 8,142.7 3,145.1 485.2 11,773
Talisayan 8,358.0 4,921.9 753.1 14,033
Villanueva 2,572.2 1,986.4 321.4 4,880
Cagayan de Oro City 23,897.1 17,382.5 0.0 41,280
El Salvador City 4,021.0 3,780.6 911.4 8,713
Gingoog City 25,011.4 16,200.5 15,632.1 56,844
Total Land Area 187,865.2 110,507.3 53,197.1 351,570
SOURCE: CLUPS of the Cities of Cagayan de Oro, Gingoog, El Salvador and the 23 Municipalities in Misamis Oriental
 Figure 1.3 Slope Map of Misamis Oriental

 Elevation

In terms of elevation, the areas below 100 meters above sea level (MASL), which refers to “low land”, comprised only 10
percent of Region X’s total land area, of which 38 percent of this elevation class are found in Misamis Oriental, mostly found
near coastal areas. The areas in the province with 100-300 MASL elevation comprised 24 percent of this elevation class,
which are widely distributed, the larger area of which is in the second district of the province where forestland dominates. The
1000-2000 to >2000 MASL elevations are found in the first district and some part of second district of the province where
mountains are connected. Areas with more than 1000 MASL are prone to landslides. Generally, temperature decreases by
about 0.6ºC with every 100-meter increase in elevation. This difference in temperature, small as they may be in the highlands
(>500 MASL) are of great importance for agriculture, since certain plants require relatively cool temperature to grow or bear
fruit successfully.

TABLE NO. 1.4: ELEVATION CLASS BY PROVINCE IN REGION X, 2007

PROVINCE < 100 100-300 300-500 500-1000 1000-2000 >2000 TOTAL LAND
MASL MASL MASL MASL MASL MASL AREA
(HAS.)
Bukidnon 1,192.00 94,905.00 200,704.00 300,435.00 217,188.00 235,435.00 1,049,859.00
Camiguin 6,361.00 6,126.00 4,951.00 4,087.00 7,662.00 0.00 29,187.00
Lanao del 65,255.41 90,428.80 89,700.90 128,555.24 8,538.31 0.00 382,478.66
Norte
Misamis 54,208.00 62,885.00 12,925.00 32,063.00 31,309.00 12,132.00 205,522.00
Occidental
Misamis 77,821.00 82,664.00 78,304.00 69,735.00 41,635.00 1,411.00 351,570.00
Oriental
Total 204,837.41 337,008.80 386,584.90 534,875.24 306,332.31 248,978.00 2,018,616.66
 Figure 1.4 Elevation Map of Misamis Oriental

 Soils

There are three general groups of soil based on topographic position that are found in Misamis Oriental, namely:

▪ Soils of the plains, valley, and undulating areas

▪ Soils of the hills, high uplands, and mountains
▪ Miscellaneous soil types

The soils in each group are in turn classified into soil types, based on the genetic and morphological characteristics of the
profile.

-Soils of the Plains, Valleys and Undulating Areas

The soils under this group are the alluvial soils of the province. They comprise the coastal plains, the valleys in the interior, and
the gently undulating areas of the lower uplands. The series are Umingan, San Manuel, Bantog, Matina, and Mambajao. They
are developed from materials of recent alluvial depositions and as such show variable characteristics. The surface soils are of
moderate fertility and deep. The acidity ranges from ph 5.50 for the Mambajao Clay to ph 6.40 for the Bantog Clay.

These soils are planted to various crops, the most important of which is coconut, occupying more than half of the area. This is
because coconut is the principal money crop planted. Other crops are corn, banana, tobacco, vegetables, root crops, abaca,
and fruit trees, such as avocado, star apple, oranges, papaya, lanzones, durian and others. This group of soils has an area of
55,173 hectares or 14 percent of the total area of the province. Mambajao Clay is the largest soil type among the soil types in
the group and coconut is the principal crop grown.
San Manuel Loam occupies a total of 13,463 hectares or 3.4 percent of the total area of the province. It is found along the
banks of the Iponan, Cagayan and Tagoloan Rivers. The plains in Medina also belong to this soil type. It is nearly level to
slightly sloping with the highest slope of about 2 percent. The surface drainage as well as the internal drainage is moderately
good.

Umingan Loam can be farmed with less effort because it occurs on a level to slightly undulating areas. A total of 5,577 hectares
or 1.42 percent of this soil type is present in the province. The largest areas are in Balingasag, Lagonglong and the Alubijid
plains. For agricultural purposes, this soil is suited to the cultivation of various farm crops and responds well to good
management, it is easily tilled. The only hazard to agriculture is over flooding especially along these areas by the riverbanks.

Umingan Clay Loam is the other soil type under the Umingan series. It differs mainly from the Umingan Loam because it has a
clay loam surface soil to a depth of 25 to 30 centimeters. The relief is level to slightly undulating. The greatest slopes do not
exceed four percent. The external and the internal drainage are good. These areas are small and scattered, and in close
association with the Umingan Loam and San Manuel Loam all in all a total of 2,502 hectares. About 50 percent is cultivated and
the rest is in cogonal and secondary forest.

Bantog Slay is found scattered in small areas in the province. The largest areas are in the plains in Gingoog proper and the
coastal areas along the national road from Kilometer 143 to Kilometer 160 going to Agusan del Norte Province. The other areas
are in the eastern part of Cagayan de Oro, and parts of the plains in Opol and Alubijid. Occurring on a nearly flat surface with a
slight slope in a direction of stream flow, this soil type has a fairly adequate external drainage. The internal drainage, however,
tends to be slow due to the textural character of the soil. Areas of Matina Clay occupy the plain in Lourdes, the coastal plain in
Manticao, the rice fields along the highway between the Cagayan and Iponan Rivers and the plain also along the highway from
Kilometer 7 to Opol. The largest areas totalled to 4,709 hectares are found in Manticao and in Cagayan de Oro City.
Agriculturally, Mambajao Clay is one of the most important soils of Misamis Oriental. This soil type is scattered in the eastern
part of Misamis Oriental, with the largest areas between the city of Gingoog and the municipality of Medina, and also between
Talisayan and Kinoguitan.

-Soils of the Hills, High Uplands, and Mountains

The soils occupying the rolling areas hills, plateau and mountains are placed under this group of soils. In this group are six soil
series, one soil complex, and one land type. These are Jasaan, Alimodian, Lourdes, Bolinao, Faraon and Camiguin series;
Jasaan-Bolinao complex; and undifferentiated Mountain Soils. The total area is 330,400 hectares or 84.3 percent of the total
area of the province.

These soils had developed from the weathering of various rocks, such as basalt, andesite, undifferentiated metamorphic rocks,
shales, coralline limestone, and sandstone. The Jasaan and Camiguin series had developed from the residual material of
conglomerate, basalt, and andesite; Faraon and Bolinao from coralline limestone and the Alimodian and Lourdes series from
shale and sandstone. The parent materials of the Jasaan series have weathered too deep that the resulting soil thickness is 2
meters or more.

The Jasaan-Bolinao complex is an association of the Jasaan and Bolinao soils that one or the other cannot be indicated
separately. Therefore, the association is mapped as a unit and called complex. The dominant texture of the soil is clay. It
occupies the hills east and west of Jasaan and covers an area of 4,593 hectares. Lourdes Clay Loam lies in the environs of
Lourdes, the western part of Lumbia, and in the south-western part of Cagayan de Oro. A total of 35,227 hectares or 9 percent
of the total area of the province and about 90 percent of which is cogonal, secondary and primary forests, the rest is cultivated.
Occurring generally in a rough terrain, the surface drainage is excessive, and erosion has been serious. Numerous gullies,
narrow ravines, and canyons are found in this soil. In many parts of the area the surface soil is thin and in some other places
the rock under has been exposed to the surface.

Bolinao clay occupies practically the whole municipality and city of El Salvador, and a bigger portion of the municipality of
Initao. Small portions occur in Cagayan de Oro and Lumbia bordering Bukidnon Province with a total of 23,953 hectares.

Faraon Clay occupies the western part of Initao and the rolling and hilly portions of Manticao along the coast to the border of
Lanao Province on the West. It has a total area of 5,265 hectares.

Camiguin Clay had developed from the weathered products of volcanic sand, basalt, and andesite rocks. It is widely distributed
in the eastern part of Misamis Oriental.

A total of 9,730 hectares of Alimodian Clay Loam is found mostly in the eastern part of the province to the border of Agusan del
Norte. Because of erosion, the surface soil varies in thickness, as well as in color. The normal depth of the surface soil is 30
centimeters. However, in some areas the surface soil is less than 10 centimeters deep and in other places, this has been
removed and what is exposed in the surface is the subsoil. The surface soil of eroded areas is lighter in color than the
uneroded areas.

The soils classified under the Undifferentiated Mountain Soils are rough and mountains which are difficult to survey because
they are hardly accessible. A total of 111,883 hectares or 28 percent of the total area of the province which are found along the
high mountains and the rough hilly ranges bordering Lanao, Bukidnon, and Agusan del Norte Provinces, most of which are
forestal. However, the cleared areas are cogonal. These soils are of no immediate agricultural value for the present and they
should be left as cogonal and forestal.

-Miscellaneous Land Types

All lands which possess little or no definite soil are classified under the group of miscellaneous land types. Hydrosol covers a
total area of 2,115 hectares or 0.54 percent of the total area of the province. This soil is usually found near the mouth of the
rivers and in some protected bays. It is under water most of the time. This soil has no agricultural value. It is, however, suited
and adopted to the growing of nipa palms and some species of mangroves. It is also used as fishponds for the culture of
“bangus”. The leaves of the nipa palms are made into nipa shingles for houses and buildings, while the mangroves are good
sources of firewood. The areas nearby, which are not under water all the time, are converted into salt beds for the extraction of
salts.

The beach sand is the narrow strip of sand along the seashores which accounted to a total of 3,993 hectares. This soil has no
developed profile. Little further inland is planted to coconut, bananas, and some fruit trees. Coconut grows well in this soil.

The pH level of the soils of the province ranges from 5.1 to 8.8. Soils of 5.2 pH are found in the municipalities of Sugbongcogon
and Medina while soils with a pH of 8.8 are found in the municipality of Magsaysay. Highest percentage in organic matter
content is found in the municipality of Binuangan with 4 percent and in Claveria and El Salvador both with 3.8 percent.
Phosphorus is found abundant in the municipality of Salay and the City of Gingoog while ample supply of potassium is found in
Gitagum and Salay.

Occurring on hilly and mountainous areas, these soils have rugged surface. There are many sharp angular hills cut by streams
in deep gorges. Numerous gullies, narrow ravines, and canyons are also present in this group of soils indicating how erosion
has seriously take place. Surface drainage is good to excessive, and the internal drainage is fairly adequate. The hills and
rolling areas along the coast are extensively planted to coconut. The flat and rolling areas are either used for pasture or
cultivated for the growing of agricultural crops, or when not in use, are cogonal, open land and secondary forest. The higher
hills and the mountains including portions of the rolling areas bordering Bukidnon and Agusan del Norte are thickly forested.
The cultivated areas are planted to coconut, abaca, fruit trees, upland rice, corn, root crops, and vegetables. The ph value
ranges from 5.45 of the Jasaan Clay to ph 6.75 of the Faraon Clay.

Jasaan clay covers an area of 34,967.24 hectares or 8.94 percent of the total area of the province. The largest areas are in the
environs of Claveria, Jasaan and Balingasag. Other areas are in Gingoog, along the Gingoog-Claveria road, and in Cagayan
de Oro, along the Bugo-Malaybalay road. The relief is flat upland, rolling, and hilly to mountainous. The external drainage is
fairly adequate.

The difference between Jasaan Clay-stony phase and Jasaan Clay is the plentiful presence of stones and boulders on the
surface of the former, which makes cultivation impossible without their removal. This soil occurs in the upland and rolling areas
of Cagayan de Oro, and the rolling and hilly areas above the coastal plains from Cagayan de Oro to Jasaan, which covers a
total hectarage of 18,8634. Practically, the whole area is freely and excessively drained that sheet erosion is and has been
active in this soil.

Jasaan Clay Loam occupies the southern part of Lumbia along the Cagayan River up to the border of Lanao Province with a
total of 18,816 hectares or 4.8 percent of the total area of the province. The relief is rolling, hilly and mountainous. In many
places, erosion has been severe forming plenty of gullies. The fields under clean culture have active sheet erosion.
 Figure 1.5 Soil Map of Misamis Oriental

 Water Resources

 Rivers Basin

Water is a resource vital to all life on earth. It is a fundamental component of the existence of life, for without water life on this
planet would never be possible. Water covers 70% of the Earth’s surface, but less than 1% of this amount is available for
human use through lakes, rivers, reservoirs, and aquifers (Soh et al., 2007). The vast quantity of water, about 97%, is in the
ocean, which is too salty for drinking, irrigation, or industry (except as coolant) and the remaining 2% is frozen in glaciers and
polar ice caps (Wetzel, 2001; Miller, 2000).

The Province of Misamis Oriental, a coastal province in Northern Mindanao, Philippines, is composed of 23 towns
(municipalities) and 3 cities. It is the center of industry, trade and commerce in the region with over 37 major industrial and
manufacturing firms. despite the growing economy of the province, its drinking water systems have not yet advanced. Water
quality is not closely monitored by most municipalities and treatment is limited only to disinfection by chlorination. The water
supply of the province is sourced from deep and shallow wells and spring. It has 48 rivers (with discharge capacity of
42,600.71 liters per second); 60 creeks; 38 springs (48,432 cubic meters a day) and two natural lakes. All municipalities have
efficient waterworks systems. Cagayan de Oro and Gingoog cities have water utilities -- the Cagayan de Oro City Water
District and Gingoog Water District.
The National Irrigation Administration (NIA) has tapped 18 rivers with high discharge rates for irrigation. The constructed dams
now provide water to 27 irrigation facilities. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources has also constructed six
intake boxes, eight reservoirs, and 10 small water-impounding dams for the irrigation of 1,538 upland beneficiaries.

Water is a critical resource that is shared by all, particularly by households for domestic use, private water and power
companies, agro-industries and business establishments. This therefore demands equitable water governance system since
many of lowland and upland farmers are deemed to be displaced if priority programs of the river management council will
focus more on non-farm sectors particularly hydropower generation. Non-government organizations, academe and funding
institutions have critical roles in promoting river basin conservation and improving tenure security and climate change
adaptation capacities of local communities. They have both funds and technical capacities to empower local communities
hence their roles were reflected in the integrated river basin management plan.

Though limited in their capacity to influence river basin policies and programs, the barangay–level service volunteers, police,
military, women’s associations and other civic organizations have important roles that need to be strengthened in the river
basin management plan. These groups have niche in grassroots works hence further tapping them in IEC, environmental law
enforcement and social work will surely make progressive paces to improve the well-being of the people in the river basin
development. The institutional arrangements of these agencies possess differing relationship in terms of mandates and
functions. Nevertheless, they have pertinent roles to carry out under the components of river basin management and
development framework, namely, water resource management, watershed management, wetland management, flood
management and institutional development. to implement these management strategies and as a solution to further eliminate
the issue of fragmentation, lack of coordination, in efficiency and overlaps, there must be a coordinating mechanism that
would harmonize the initiatives in the river basin. Also, there should be a coordinating body to facilitate delivery of goods and
services by the stakeholders as well as provide mechanisms for conflict resolution among stakeholders.

-Tagoloan River Basin

The Tagoloan River Basin is situated between 8°07‟ and 9°39‟ north latitude and 124° 44‟ and 125°12‟ east longitude in the
provinces of Misamis Oriental and Bukidnon. The river basin has a total drainage area of 1,577 square kilometers. Its main
drainage is the Tagoloan River with a generally north western flow. The Macajalar Bay serves as the discharge point of the
whole basin. A total of 10 municipalities and 94 barangays encompasses the river basin’s network. The major rivers of the
river basin are Tagoloan River, Malitbog River, Siloo River, Titian River, Mangima River, Alulum River, Amusig River, and Dila
River.

Tagoloan River Basin lies in two provinces in the region of Northern Mindanao: Misamis Oriental and Bukidnon. Using the
Coronas Climate Classification, these two provinces fall under Type III and Type IV, respectively. Type III describes a climate
that is relatively dry from the months of November to April and wet for the remaining months of the year. This climate mainly
affects Misamis Oriental and Central Bukidnon. Type IV is characterized by rainfall that has relatively even distribution
throughout the year.

Almost 29.6% (53,012 ha) of the total basin area is devoted to cultivated annual crops (mostly pineapple) while just 14.0%
(24,984 ha) is covered with closed forests. These forests are mainly situated in elevations above 1,500 MASL. Open forests
and land cultivated with perennial crops (sugarcane or banana) cover 10.0% (17,912.2 ha) and 6.9% (12,305.9 ha),
respectively, while 38.0% (67,968.9 ha) are classified as grassland and other wooded lands. Built-up areas are sporadically
scattered which aggregately partake 1.6% (2,865.7 ha) of the area. Among the sub-watersheds, Amusig and Dumalaguing
have the highest forest cover at 44%, while Diklum and Colosotan are almost completely covered with annual crops
(pineapple) with 96% and 95%, respectively. Tagoloan have 19% considered as built-up areas.

The estimated dependable surface water and projected demand of water resources reveal that seven percent (7%) of the
Tagoloan watershed catchment is supporting the increasing demand for water supply currently used by municipal industries
and by the agricultural sector.

The Lower Tagoloan River, which is supported by the Mangima River, has the highest dependable surface water of 1,142.53
MCM. The surface water demand in 1996 is estimated at 39 MCM; 29.7 MCM is used by the industrial sector while 9.3 MCM
is exhausted by the agricultural and municipal sectors. by 2025, the demand for water is projected at 176.6 MCM. Without
proper management intervention to protect the water resource of Tagoloan River, the supply might not be enough to sustain
the increasing demand of the increasing population dependent on the river system.

Flooding incidents within the Tagoloan River Basin are normally classified as fluvial (or those occurring along the river).
Coastal flooding on the area is geographically limited, since the river basin is only connected to the coastal area through the
main Tagoloan River outlet, located at the province of Misamis Oriental. MGB has identified some the flood prone coastal
areas within Misamis Oriental.
Flooding incidents are generally caused by tropical cyclones that have made landfall in the Mindanao region. Based on the
reports of the Manila Observatory (MO), an average of one (1) typhoon has hit Mindanao from 1883-1990. The report was
based on data from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC). JTWC reported that 35 tropical cyclones made landfall in
Mindanao from 1945 to 2010 (65 years). MO inferred that an average of one tropical cyclone occurs in Mindanao every two
years. Based on the 2015 assessment, the number of tropical cyclones hitting the island has decreased. However, in recent
year, Mindanao has been hit by a series of strong storms and typhoons which included Sendong (2011), Pablo (2012) and the
effects of Yolanda (2013), among others. There seems to be a changing storm pattern in the region which could be linked to
climate change.

-Cagayan de Oro River Basin

The biggest portion of this basin is in the province of Bukidnon while the rest are within the province of Misamis Oriental. The
basin lies between coordinates within 7o57’ and 8o31’ North latitude to 124o31’ and 124o52’ to East longitude. It covers
approximately 1,471 square kilometers of mountainous terrain with only 86 square kilometers of level to undulating area. Its
headwater originates from the northwestern slopes of the Kitanglad Mountain with Bulang, Calawig, Tagiti, Sumalawan and
the Bubunawan Rivers as the principal tributaries. Cagayan de Oro River, which is the principal drainage way, flows in north
direction and drains into the Macajalar Bay with an estimated discharge of 3,654 million cubic meters (mcm) annually. It plays
a significant role in Cagayan de Oro City development for its agricultural usage. Its headwater, Bubunawan River, is a source
of tap water processed by Rio Verde and sold by bulk to Cagayan de Oro Water District (COWD). Bubunawan River is also
used for hydro-electric generation. Furthermore, the Cagayan de Oro River is one most visited tourism sites in Mindanao for
its whitewater rafting adventure.

-Coastal and Marine Resources

One of the responsibilities of the Local Government Units (LGUs) under the 1991 Local Government Code (Republic Act or
RA 7160) and Executive Order (EO) 533 is Coastal resource management (CRM). EO 533 mandates the LGUs to establish
their CRM plans. Thus, municipalities are responsible for the protection of local waters, which is measured within 15 km from
the general coastline.

Many coastal management issues cut across sectors — e.g., the aquaculture sector, if not properly zoned, could affect ship
navigation routes and tourism sites. The conventional, sectoral management approach, which addresses these challenges
separately on a sector-by-sector basis, is typically not sufficient for solving complex problems in coastal areas.

 Rivers & Creeks

The province has a total of 80 rivers and 60 creeks that serve as sources for dependable and safe water supply for
agricultural, domestic, commercial, and industrial uses. Out of these 80 rivers, 11 are classified as Class “A”. These are
Balatukan River, Cabulig River, Cagayan de Oro River, Alubijid River (class A upstream and class “C” downstream), Iponan
River, Gingoog River, Odiongan River, Magsaysay River, Naawan River, Solana River, and Tagoloan River. Although,
Misamis Oriental has adequate number of springs to supply the domestic water needs of different municipalities.

Water pollution and river flooding are becoming the major problems because of informal settlers along rivers and creeks
contributes to the solid waste problems, irresponsible mining and quarrying results to siltation and choking of the river mouth,
and farming malpractices that destroys water biodiversity.

Table Number 1.5: List of Rivers in Misamis Oriental

NAME OF RIVER LOCATION TOTAL AREA COVERAGE CLASSIFICATION

Province of Bukidnon & Misamis 177,799.48 hectares Class “A” waters

1. Tagoloan River Basin Oriental
2. Alae River Municipality of Tagoloan 6,935.43 hectares Upstream Class “A”
Brgy. Agusan, Cagayan de Oro 11,530.80 hectares Upstream Class “A”
3. Agusan River City Downstream Class “C”
Brgy. Tablon, Cagayan de Oro City 681.02 hectares Upstream Class “A”
4. Umalag River Downstream Class “C”
Brgy. Cugman, Cagayan de Oro 9,499.43 hectares Upstream Class “A”
5. Cugman River City Downstream Class “C”
Brgy. Cugman, Cagayan de Oro 5,599.08 Upstream Class “A”
6. Bigaan River City Downstream Class “C”
 Baungon, Libona, Talakag, all of 138,732 hectares Class “A” waters
7. Cagayan de Oro Bukidnon; Cagayan de Oro City,
River Basin Iligan City
Iponan, Cagayan de Oro City 40,501 hectares Class “A” waters
8. Iponan River
9. Molugan River El Salvador, Mis. Or. 6,845 hectares Unclassified

NAME OF RIVER LOCATION TOTAL AREA COVERAGE CLASSIFICATION

10. Gahub River Gingoog City, Traverses Barangay 24, 16,
9, 24 A, Murallon,
Tinulongan Kipuntos,
Kalagonoy
11. Sugbongcogon Municipality of Sugbongcogon, Traverses Brgys. Silad,
River Mis. Or. Poblacion, Kalubo, Campo,
Mimbuahan, Ampianga,
Kitamban, Valdechoncha,
Kidampas, Kaulayanan,
Guinalaban, Kagumahan

 Waterfalls

The province has among the coolest and freshest natural waterfalls in Mindanao, varying from ten to a hundred and fifty feet
high.

Table 1.6 Lists of Waterfalls in Misamis Oriental by Municipality/City IN Misamis Oriental

LOCATION NAME OF WATERFALL DISCRIPTION

MUNICIPALITY BARANGAY
Balingasag Dumarait Say-og Falls
Balingoan Dahilig Langit-langit Falls
Odiongan Odiongan Falls 150 ft. high
Gingoog City Bakid-Bakid Falls 100 ft.high
Balantian Tiklas Falls 30 m swimming pool 120 ft. high
diameter
Balantian Balintian Kibulig Falls
Bangbang 70 ft. high
Kinoguitan Kalitian Langit-langit Falls -
Kagumahan La Bintana -
Salicapawan Kahulugan
Salay Yungod Kamangmang Falls
Lower Poblacion Kahulugan Waterfall -
Sugbongcogon Upper Poblacion Sinabayan Falls 12 ft. high
Upper Poblacion Mimbuaya Waterfall 10 ft. high
Lower Poblacion Kalitian Waterfall -
Kaulayanan Kaulayanan Fall -
Malagana Mailig Falls
Patrocenio Patrocenio Falls
Claveria Kalawitan Kalawitan Falls
Malani Malani Falls
Lanesi Lanesi Falls
Jasaan San Isidro Sagpulong Falls
El Salvador San Francisco de Asis Sikiop Falls
Laguindingan Sinai Tagbabanga Waterfalls
Alubijid Sungay Kadaitan
Lourdes Kabalyero
Tagbalogo Kanapulan Falls 20 feet high
Naawan
Lubilan Talabaan Falls -
Lubilan Lubilan Falls 12 feet high
Mat-i Mahangob
 Manticao Cabalintian Kalayo Falls
Lugait Upper Talacogon Aya-aya Falls

 Ground Waters

The ground water is grouped into three (3) categories based on the depthness of the aquifers and discharges, namely: a)
difficult areas; b) deep areas greater than (20M); and c) shallow areas within (20M).

-Difficult Areas

In Difficult areas, groundwater supply is minimal and the probability of encountering non-productive boreholes is very high.
Groundwater replenishment in these areas is only through rock fissures, cracks and crevices which predominantly exist in sites
where there are faults and other geologic discontinuities. The remaining 1,850 sq. km. or 52 % is accounted for the difficult
areas and is concentrated mostly in the middle part of the province. The municipalities of Talisayan, Balingoan, Sugbongcogon,
Upper Jasaan, Villanueva and Claveria fall under this category.

-Deep Areas

The deep well areas are characterized by aquifers or water-bearing formations generally located at a depth of more than 20
meters below ground surface (mbgs). The constructions of deep wells, with depth greater than 20 meters are recommended in
these areas. About 1,290 sq. kilometers or 36% of the total land area, covering the western and portions of the province along
the Misamis Oriental-Agusan boundary are deep well areas. The municipalities under these areas are Lugait, Initao, Libertad,
Gitagum, Laguindingan and on the western side of Magsaysay.

-Shallow Areas

Shallow well areas are suitable for construction of wells with depths of not more than 20 meters and are recommended for rural
water supply development, particularly Levels I and II services. Static water levels in these areas are generally within 6 meters
below ground surface. Shallow well areas occupy about 430 sq.km. or 12 % of the provincial land area. These include the
municipalities of Balingasag, Lagonglong, Medina and Gingoog City. Alubijid, including Opol , El Salvador and some parts of
Alubijid.

 Land Resources

 Mountain Ranges

Four mountain ranges are found within the province namely the Balatukan Mountain Range on the east and southeast which
extends from Balingasag to Gingoog City, the Caballero Mountain Range on the northwest which extends from the interior
regions of Initao to Laguindingan, Mapoto Mountain Range on the south which extends from the interior regions of Alubijid to
Cagayan de Oro City and the adjacent Kitanglad Mountain Range which extends from Initao to the western edge of Mapolo
Mountain Range. The valley is drained by the Iponan and Cagayan de Oro rivers and their tributaries towards Macajalars Bay to
the north.

 Terrace and Plateau

Misamis Oriental plateaus are visible only in the western part of the municipality of Claveria adjacent to the municipalities of
Balingasag, Jasaan, Villanueva and Tagoloan. There are three distinct plateaus that exist within the city limits of Cagayan de
Oro. The most extensive one occupies the southeastern region. Another plateau is situated west of the Cagayan River along the
road to Lumbia and Talakag, Bukidnon. The third is in the south-central region just north of Barangay Indahag.

 Volcanoes

There are four volcanoes in the province, all of which are located in the eastern portion. These are Mount Balatukan (2,560 kms)
and Mt. Mangaban (78 kms) in Gingoog City, Mt. Pamalihi (1,956 kms) in Lagonglong and Mt. Obulan (1.245 kms) in
Lagonglong and Balingasag. Said volcanoes are inactive (reference?) and as such, these have not erupted within historic times
and their forms are beginning to change by agents of weathering and erosion via formation of deep and long gullies.
  Caves

Caves are located mostly in the western part of the province, particularly in Initao and Laguindingan. However, the longest cave
is found in the municipality of Opol with 187.43-meter cave length. Caves are found to be enriched with important scientific,
educational, cultural, historical, and aesthetic values and home of mineral formations, as well as unique and diverse flora and
fauna. Caves are located mostly in the western part of the province, particularly in Initao.

1.1.3 Land Area

In Region X has a total land Area of 20,186.17 Sq. Km. the 4 th largest in the country in terms of land area. The biggest land
area in the Region is in Bukidnon has a total land area of 10,498.59 square kilometres (LMB of DENR, 2008). Misamis
Oriental is the 3rd largest land area in the Region with a total land area of 3,515.70 sq. km. or 17.4% share as shown in Table
1.1 presents the land area of province in region.

Table Number 1.7 Land Area in Region X (Northern Mindanao) 2019

Province Land Area (Sq.Km.) Percent Share

Bukidnon 10,498.59 52.0
Camiguin 291.87 1.4
Lanao del Norte 3,824.79 19.0
Misamis Occidental 2,055.22 10.2
Misamis Oriental 3,515.70 17.4
Total 20,186.17 100.0

The province occupies a total land area of 3,131.52 square kilometres or 31,570 hectares. . When Cagayan de Oro City is
included for geographical purposes, the province's land area is 3,544.32 square kilometres or 392,850 hectares. Gingoog City
in District 1 has the biggest land area of 58,843 hectares or 15% of the total land area of the province, while in District 2 is
Claveria of 58,736 hectares or 15% of the total land area of the province. The smallest land area in District 1 is Sugbongcogon
of 2,651 hectares or 0.67% of the total land area of the province while in District 2 is Laguindingan with only 1,674 hectares or
0.43% of the total land area of the province and the home of the proposed international airport in Misamis Oriental.
.

Table 1.8. Total Land Area of Misamis Oriental by Municipality & City

Misamis Oriental Land Area – 351,570 hectares including Cagayan de Oro City
Congressional District 1 Congressional District 2
Municipality Land Area (hectares) Municipality Land Area (hectares)
Magsaysay 14,314 Jasaan 7,702
Gingoog City 56,844 Claveria 57,963
Medina 14,829 Villanueva 4,880
Talisayan 14,033 Tagoloan 11,773
Balingoan 5,780 Opol 17,513
Kinoguitan 4,256 El Salvador City 8,713
Sugbongcogon 2,650 Alubijid 10,345
Binuangan 3,043 Laguindingan 1,674
Salay 9,279 Gitagum 4,340
Lagonglong 8,378 Libertad 2,247
Balingasag 14,711 Initao 11,127
Total Land Area District 1 – 148,117 hectares Naawan 8,850
District 3 Manticao 12,301
 Cagayan de Oro City 41,280 hectares Lugait 2,745
Total Land Area District 2 162,173 hectares

1.1.4 Land Classification

The land area of Region X is generally classified as Forestlands and Alienable and Disposable Lands (A&D). There is almost
equal distribution of Forestland (1,083,319 hectares) 54 percent and A & D (935,298 hectares) 46 percent. The Province of
Misamis Oriental has 17 percent land area share of the region with Bukidnon has the largest land area share of 52 percent and
19 percent land area share of Lanao del Norte. However, in terms of A&D, Misamis Oriental has 25 percent area share of the
region while Bukidnon has 41 percent land area share.

Table Number 1.9 Regions X Land Classification by Province CY2017

FOREST LAND (Hectares) ALIENABLE & TOTAL

PROVINCE DISPOSABLE
Production Protection Total
Bukidnon 187,548 481,978 669,526 380,333 1,049,859
Lanao del 79,238 115,504 194,742 187,737 382,479
Norte
Misamis 62,346 52,253 114,599 236,971 351,570
Oriental
Misamis 27,684 71,304 98,988 106,534 205,522
Occidental
Camiguin 540 4,924 5,464 23,723 29,187
TOTAL 357,356 725,963 1,083,319 935,298 2,018,617
Source: DENR- X

As of 2011, about 236,971 hectares or 67 percent of the total land area of the province has been classified as A & D lands while
the remaining 114,599 hectares or 33 percent accounts for forestlands. In all the cities and municipalities, areas classified as A
& D lands exceed the Forestlands with the cities of Gingoog, Claveria and Cagayan de Oro City showing bigger proportion of A
& D lands to the total land area of the province.

At present, the multiple uses of forestlands are continually being assessed to ensure optimum benefits. Of the total 114,599
hectares of forestlands, 54 percent have been classified as production forest and the remaining 46 percent as protection forest.
For the city/municipal breakdowns, Cagayan de Oro accounted for 24 percent of the total 58,573.2 hectares of the province’s
total production forest. Meanwhile, Claveria and Gingoog City shared 39 percent and 36 percent of the total 56,025.5 hectares of
the province’s protection forest, respectively.

Protection Forests - Protection land use pertains to the rehabilitation, conservation, sustainable development, and management
of the following areas:

▪ Areas declared as belonging to the National Integrated Protected Area System (NIPAS) per Republic Act No. 7586
▪ Areas outside the NIPAS requiring equivalent amount of protection; and
▪ Areas prone to natural hazards termed as environmentally constrained area.

Human interference in the form of deforestation creates destruction to watersheds not only for agricultural activities instead for
making furniture’s and building houses. These activities hasten the occurrence of flooding especially in low-lying areas.
Likewise, some portions even of protected areas are being encroached for forest extraction activities.
 Table Number 1.10 Land Classification of Misamis Oriental by Municipality/City, 2017

Municipality/City Forest Land (Hectares ) Alienable & Total

Production Protection Total Disposable
No District 1 17,643.1 27,104.2 44,747.3 117,501.0 162,248.3
1 Balingasag 569.4 2,969.5 3,538.9 14,356.0 17,894.9
2 Balingoan 359.3 202.1 561.3 4,314.0 4,875.3
3 Binuangan 0.0 9.6 9.6 3,043.0 3,052.6
4 Gingoog City 3,660.0 20,044.1 23,704.0 36,460.0 60,164.0
5 Kinoguitan 148.4 311.2 459.5 4,256.0 4,715.5
6 Lagonglong 73.8 2,656.0 2,729.8 6,012.0 8,741.8
7 Magsaysay 4,076.2 214.9 4,291.1 14,770.0 19,061.1
8 Medina 5,030.5 182.0 5,212.5 14,829.0 20,041.5
9 Salay 1,401.8 401.0 1,802.7 5,731.0 7,533.7
10 Sugbongcogon 288.7 56.1 344.8 2,651.0 2,995.8
11 Talisayan 2,035.3 57.7 2,093.0 11,079.0 13,172.0
DISTRICT II 26,871.6 28,765.0 55,636.6 102,263.0 157,899.6
1 Alubijid 3,044.9 399.4 3,444.3 10,345.0 13,789.3
2 Claveria 5,411.4 21,643.1 27,054.5 21,204.0 48,258.5
3 El Salvador 2,515.6 698.5 3,214.1 8,713.0 11,927.1
4 Gitagum 1,187.7 204.5 1,392.1 4,340.0 5,732.1
5 Initao 3,746.6 45.7 3,792.3 10,133.0 13,925.3
6 Jasaan 364.9 122.7 487.6 7,702.0 8,189.6
7 Laguindingan 12.8 0.0 12.8 1,674.0 1,686.8
8 Libertad 4.8 3.2 8.0 2,398.0 2,406.0
9 Lugait 51.3 0.0 51.3 1,784.0 1,835.3
10 Manticao 3,125.9 1,918.2 5,044.1 12,301.0 17,345.1
11 Naawan 3,206.9 428.2 3,635.1 3,474.0 7,109.1
12 Opol 2,106.7 2,194.9 4,301.5 8,057.0 12,358.5
13 Tagoloan 1,113.9 128.3 1,242.2 5,258.0 6,500.2
14 Villanueva 978.4 978.3 1,956.7 4,880.0 6,836.7
15 Cagayan de Oro 14,058.5 156.4 14,214.9 17,207.3 31,422.1
Misamis Oriental 58,573.2 56,025.5 114,598.7 236,971.3 351,570.0
Source: DENR- X
 Figure 1.6 Land Classification Map of Misamis
Oriental

1.1.5 Land Suitability

Land suitability is the classification of land into categories based on the degree to which the characteristics of the land can
satisfy the environmental requirements of crops, without deterioration.

The land suitability is ranked according to priorities 1 to 5. Table 1.11 describes the Priority 1 to 5, its percent share of land
area and its land suitability. These parameters are based on land classification, slope percentage, protection areas, and
environmentally constrained areas, of the total land area of the province, 70% or 236,174 hectares is Priority 5 which is non-
buildable and highly non-suitable for agricultural crops, thus protection forest is recommended. Only 0.32% or 1,067 hectares
is suitable for irrigated rice and cultivated crops while 0.50% or 1,666 hectares are suitable for perennial tree and vine crops.

Table No. 1.11 Land Suitability for Settlement in Misamis Oriental 2013

RANK DESCRIPTION AREA % SHARE LAND SUTABILITY

(HECTARES) TOTAL LAND
AREA
Priority 1 High priority- A&D; 1,067 0.32 Irrigated rice, Freshwater
built-up area; 0-8% fishponds, Cultivated annual
slope; below 100 masl crops
elevation; non-ECAS;
Priority 2 Moderate Priority – 1,666 0.50 perennial tree and vine crops
agricultural area;
irrigable area; agro-
industrial area; fishery
development zone; 8-
18% slope; 100-500
masl elevation; Low
ECAs
Priority 3 Low Priority – 84,614 25.39 Forest plantation
forestland; 500-1000
masl elevation; Hazard
prone
Priority 4 Very low Priority – 9,791 2.94 Production Forest
Medium ECAs
Priority 5 Highly Unsuitable/ Non- 236,174 70.86 Protection Forest
buildable; timberlands;
forestlands; water
bodies; NIPAS & NON-
NIPAS; above 30%
slope
Source: PPDO-Misamis Oriental
 Figure 1.7 Map Index Land Resource Evaluations and Suitability
Assessment of Strategic Production Area of Misamis
Oriental

 Areas Prone to Hazards

Below is a summary of the Rapid/Reconnaissance Geo hazard Assessment conducted by the Mines and Geosciences Bureau
(MGB) Regional office X in 2008-2009. The activity aims to characterize and zone the identified geo hazard such as landslides,
subsidence, and flooding in relation to geology and geomorphology. These data are made available to the concerned local
government units and the local communities to increase awareness as well as build community capability in mitigating and
handling geologic hazards.

Table Number 1.12. Summary Report on Rapid Geo Hazard Assessment in Misamis Oriental

CITY/ MGB ASSESSMENT

MUNICIPALITY
Prone to flooding are Brgys. Agusan, Baikingon, Balulang, Barangay 1,Barangay 10,
Barangay 11, Barangay 12, Barangay 13, Barangay 14,Barangay 15, Barangay 16,
Barangay 17, Barangay 18, Barangay 19, Barangay 2, Barangay 20, Barangay 21, Barangay
22, Barangay 23,Barangay 24, Barangay 25, Barangay 26, Barangay 27, Barangay
Cagayan de 28,Barangay 29, Barangay 3, Barangay 30, Barangay 31, Barangay 32,Barangay 33,
Oro City Barangay 34, Barangay 35, Barangay 36, Barangay 37,Barangay 38, Barangay 39,
Barangay 4, Barangay 40, Barangay 5,Barangay 6, Barangay 7, Barangay 8, Barangay 9,
 Bayabas, Bonbon, Bugo, Bulua, Camaman-an, Canito-an, Carmen, Consolacion, Cugman,
Gusa, Iponan, Kauswagan, Lapasan, Lumbia, Macabalan, Macasandig, Nazareth, Pagatpat,
Patag, Puerto, Puntod, San Simon, Tablon, Tagpangi
Highly susceptible to rain-induced landslides are Brgys. Agusan, Balubal, Balulang,
Bayanga, Besigan, Bugo, Camaman-An, Canito-An, Carmen, Cugman, Dansolihon, F. S.
Catanico, Gusa, Indahag, Lumbia, Macasandig, Mambuaya, Pagalungan, Pagatpat, Pigsag-
an, Puerto, San Simon, Tablon, Taglimao, Tagpangi, Tignapoloan, Tuburan, Tumpagon
Prone to coastal flooding is Brgy. San Luis, Agay-ayan, Lunao, 18-A, Santiago, Punong,
Pangasihan, Odiongan, Anakan, and Daan Lungsod.
Brgys. Kamnikan, Kianlagan, Kibuging, Libon and Mimbalagon are highlysusceptible to
Gingoog City landslide.
Parts of Brgys, Malinao, Bantawan, Talisay and Odiongan are consideredmoderately
susceptible to landslide.
Brgys. Bakidbakid, Lunotan, Malinao, Mimbunga, Pigsaluhan, Rocoro andSamay have low
susceptibility to landslide. Some portions of these barangays have higher susceptibility
ratings
Other barangays with low landslide susceptibility include: Anakan, Bagubad, Bal-ason, Lawa-an, Libertad, Malibud,
Minsapinit, Pangasihan, Punong, San Jose, Santiago, Talisay and Talon 25
Flooding is the most common geologic hazard affecting a significant portion of the area yearly.
Ten barangays are frequently affected by floods (Amoros, Bolisong, Himaya, Hinigdaan,
El Salvador City Kalabaylabay, Molugan, P.S. Baculio, Sambulawan, San Francisco de Asis and Sinaloc)
Brgys. Poblacion, Taytay and Ulaliman are rarely affected by flooding
Storm surge affects the coastal puroks of Barangays Poblacion, Molugan and P.S. Baculio
Brgy. San Francisco de Asis has moderate landslide susceptibility
Riverine and coastal flooding is the most common hazard in the municipality affecting almost
all the areas situated along the major rivers and creeks and along the coast. This can be
attributed to Iponan River, Bungcalalan Rive and their tributaries.
Brgy, Barra is high risk since strong current from the Iponan River can directly affect the area
Opol Brgy. Igpit is high risk since several houses are located tight at the foot slope where active
landslide occurs.
Brgys. Awang and Nangcaon are rated to be moderate to high risk to landslides
Brgys. Bagocbog, Cauyonan, Malanang, Patag, Poblacion and Tingalan are rated to have
low to moderate risk because of the presence of old and new active landslides.

CITY/ MGB ASSESSMENT

MUNICIPALITY
Brgy. Tula is cut by a number of active normal faults and slump structures associated with
sag ponds and step like topography.
Alubijid Active quarry was observed along the highway in Brgy. Loguilo which may result to slope
instabilities and landslide in the future.
in Brgy. Lumbo, Alubijid Fault has been active for the last 20 years or so
Sheet flood is common in Brgy. Taparak
Parts of Brgys. Ulab, Aromahon, Sinai, Sambulawan, Kibaghot, Moog and
Laguindingan Gasi are considered low susceptibility for landslides
Areas susceptible to subsidence – parts of Brgys. Mauswagon, Tubajon, Poblacion, Sinai
and Sambulawan. Part of Brgys. Tubajon and Mauswagon and the floodplains of Gitagum,
Aromahon-Cogon River and Tambo and Ulab Creeks and minor tributaries are the most
flood-prone areas
Parts of Brgys. G. Pelaez and Kilangit are marked with moderate susceptibility for landslides,
while the rest of the Barangays are considered low.
Gitagum Areas susceptible to subsidence include parts of Brgys. Burnay, Pangayawan and
Matangad.
Brgys. Pangayawan (Purok 1), Burnay (Purok 6&7), C.P. Garcia and Ulab (Purok 5) are
considered flood-prone areas
Brgys. Taytayan, Dulong, Gimaylan and Poblacion are prone to riverine floodings.
Libertad Brgys. Lubluban, Kimalok and Taytayan are low to moderately susceptible to landside
Brgys. Sinalac, TawanTawan and Aluna are rated low to moderate to landslide susceptibility.
Initao Poblacion, Gimangpang and Jampason are among the areas that are highly susceptible to
fluvial floods 26
Brgy. Propers of Lubilan and Tuboran are moderately susceptible to landslides. Other areas
Naawan of these barangays are given high susceptibility rating. Brgys. Mapulog, Mat-I, Patag, and
Tagbalogo have low landslide susceptibility. Brgys., Linangkayan, Maputi and Poblacion are
not prone to
Brgy. Upper Malubog is highly susceptible to landslide. Brgys. Camanga, Digkalaan,
Manticao Mahayahay and Tu-od are moderately prone to landslide. Brgys. Argayoso, Balintad,
Cabalantian and Paniangan have low landslide susceptibility. However, Argayoso and
Balintad have some puroks with high susceptible rating.
Lugait Brgys. Aya-aya, Betahon, Kaluknayan and Upper Talacogon are moderately susceptible to
landslide. Brgys. Biga and Lower Talacogon have low susceptibility to landslide. Barangay
proper of Calangahan and Poblacion are not prone to landslide. Coastal area of Brgy.
Calangahan frequently affected by coastal flooding and storm surge.
Brgy. Rosario is rated to be moderate to high landslide susceptibility Low lying areas situated
Tagoloan proximal to the 3 major rivers (Pugaan, Tagoloan and Alae) and along the coastal areas are
susceptible to flooding.
Brgys. Tambobong, Looc, Dayawan, Balacanas and Poblacion are regularly inundated by
Villanueva flood waters. Brgys. Kimaya, Balacanas and Poblacion 1 show indications of possible
landslide threats. Brgys, Looc, Balacanas and Poblacion 1 are susceptible to coastal water
inundation or coastal flooding.
Parts of Brgy. Lanise have moderate to high landslide susceptibility. Brgys. Parmbugas,
Claveria Malagana, Bulahan and Tipolohon have moderate landslide susceptibility Brgys.Madaguing,
Aposkahoy, Rizal, Panampawan, Luna, Tambono-an and Lanise have low to moderate
landslide susceptibility. Brgy. Mat-I has high landslide susceptibility.

CITY/ MGB ASSESSMENT

MUNICIPALITY
Brgys. San Nicolas, Upper Jasaan, Bobontugan and Lower Jasaan are commonly to
Jasaan seasonally affect by riverine flooding Sitios Alog in Brgy Upper Jasaan and Sitio Taparak,
Purok Makugihon in Brgy. Kimaya were identified as having high susceptibility to landslide •
Brgys. Natubo and San Isidro were rated as moderately susceptible to landslides Brgys.
Corrales and Solana were rated as low to moderate for landslide susceptibility.
Brgys. Camuayan, Hermano and Samay are highly susceptible to landslide Brgys. Balagnan,
Balingasag Dansuli, Quezon and San Francisco have moderate landslide susceptibility Brgys. Calawag
and San Juan have low susceptibility to landslide 27.
Brgy. Kabulawan is affected with coastal flood and storm surge Brgy. Manaol is identified as having
Lagonglong high susceptibility to landslide. Brgys. Banglay was rated with low to moderate for landslide
susceptibility.
Brgys. Poblacion, Casulog, Salay River Side1, Salay River Side 2 and Inobolan are prone to
Salay coastal and flooding and erosion. The barangay center of Ili-ilihon is moderate to highly
susceptible to landslide and other types of mass movements. The coastal barangays
including portions of Poblacion, Casulog, Salay River Side, Salay River Side 2 and Inobulan
are moderately susceptible to mudflow.
Sitio Lourdes in Brgy. Poblacion is highly susceptible to landslide. Brgys. Dampias,
Binuangan Mosangot and Valdeconcha have low to moderate landslide susceptibility Sitio Kumagaykay
of Brgy. Kitamban is moderately susceptible to landside.
All barangays have low landslide susceptibility. Areas along Silad River particularly Puroks 1
Sugbongcogon and 3 of Brgy. Poblacion and Purok 1 and 2 of Brgy. Silad are susceptible to flooding.
Brgys. Bolisong, Buko, Esperanza, Panabol and Sumalag are regularly inundated by coastal
flooding especially during rainy season accompanied with high tide Most of the barangays
Kinoguitan are not susceptible to landslides because they are situated on relatively flat areas that are
distant from steep slopes. Brgy. Calitian is moderately to highly susceptible to landslide
Kinigitan Hill in Brgy. Salicapawan is highly susceptible to landslide.
Purok 6 near Mt. Kibogtok in Brgy. Mantangale and Sitio Anoling in Brgy. Kabulakan have
Balingoan high landslide susceptibility. Coastal and riverine floodings are the most common hazards
that posed a. threat to lives and properties
Purok 4 of Brgy. Tagbocboc has high landslide susceptibility. Portions of Brgys. Mandahilag,
 Talisayan Pangpangon, Putting Balas have moderate. landslide susceptibility Brgys. Bugdang,
Casibole, Macopa, Mahayag, Sibantang and portions of Pangpangon, Putting Balas, Sta
Ines and Sibantang has low susceptibility to landslide.
Parts of Brgy. Tambagan is considered moderately susceptible to landslide. Brgys. Duka,
Bulwa, Gasa, Mananum Daan, San Isidro, San Vicente have low to moderate landslide
Medina susceptibility. Parts of Brgys. Bulwa, Cabug, Duka, Maanas, North Poblacion, Pahindong,
South Poblacion and Tup-on are susceptible to coastal flooding and erosion.
Brgy. Cabantian is a landslide-prone area. The coastal barangays: Poblacion, San Isidro,
Magsaysay Damayuhan, Villa Felipa, Sta. Cruz, Artadi, Kandiis, Bonifacio Aquino and Consuelo Aquino
are prone to coastal flooding and erosion Brys. Cabantian, Tibon-tibon, and Taytayan are low
to moderately susceptible to landslide.
Source : MGB X
 Figure 1.8 Geo Hazard Map of Misamis Oriental

 Landslides

The areas identified as high in terms of landslide susceptibility in Misamis Oriental are very few though geohazard assessment
of the whole province by MGB-10 is by no means completed. Moderate to high landslide susceptibilities for Misamis Oriental
on a barangay level is provided in the table below. These data were based on MGB-10’s rapid geohazard assessment of the
fourteen (14) municipalities in Misamis Oriental which includes Magsaysay, Gingoog, Medina, Talisayan, Balingoan,
Sugbongcogon, Kinoguitan, Binuangan, Lagonglong, Initao, Libertad, Gitagum, Laguindingan and Alubijid. Note that MGB
rates landslide susceptibility in terms of the following parameters:

-High Susceptibility
  Presence of active and/or recent landslides
 Presence of numerous and large tension cracks that would directly affect the community
 Areas with drainages that are prone to landslides damming
 Steep slopes

-Moderate Susceptibility

 Areas with indicative and/or old landslides

 Presence of small tension cracks and are located away from the community
 Moderate slopes

-Low Susceptibility

 Flat to gently sloping

 No presence of tension cracks

 Earthquake Fault line’s

For the fault lines of earthquake, the Provincial Disaster Risk Reduction Management Office said that “earthquake generators:
are located in the following:

➢ The Mindanao central fault line from Barangay Santiago in Gingoog City to the Davao Provinces;
➢ Cabanglasan, Bukidnon fault line that starts from Balingasag, Misamis Oriental;
➢ Tagoloan fault line from the Tagoloan River to Libona, Bukidnon;
➢ Magsaysay fault line from the Tagalogos River in Magsaysay to the Agusan provinces in Caraga, and
➢ The Lanao fault line from Barangay Lourdes in Alubijid town all the way to the Lanao provinces.

The effects of earthquakes can cause massive damage to large infrastructures, and repairing or replacing these can take a
long time. Bridges and overpasses that are damaged have to be rebuilt, and traffic has to be re-routed during the rebuilding
process. Bridges and overpasses that were not damaged or demolished have to be inspected for safety, and this also causes
traffic to be re-routed, causing confusion and traffic jams for motorists. Landslides, resulting from earthquakes, flatten and
destroy houses causing added loss of life from the earthquake.
 Figure 1.9 Erosion Map of Misamis Oriental

Table Number 1.13 CITY/MUNICIPALITY BY DISTRICT PRONE TO FLOOD AND RAIN – INDUCED LANDSLIDE

FLOOD RAIN-INDUCED LANDSLIDE

CITY/MUNICIPALITY BY DISTRICT Estimated Land Percentage Area Estimated Land Percentage Area
Area Affected Affected Area Affected Affected
DISTRICT 1
1 Balingasag 33.74 22.94 91.86 62.44
2 Balingoan 0.32 0.56 62.33 107.84
3 Binuangan 0.11 0.35 15.21 49.98
4 Gingoog City 19.50 3.43 518.56 91.22
5 Kinoguitan 0.36 0.84 35.83 84.19
 6 Lagonglong 7.10 8.47 39.53 47.18
7 Magsaysay 15.10 10.55 103.11 72.03
8 Medina 0.42 0.28 118.23 79.73
9 Salay 0.18 0.20 56.28 60.65
10 Sugbongcogon 0.17 0.65 21.18 79.91
11 Talisayan 0.40 0.28 64.75 46.14
DISTRICT II
1 Alubijid 0.97 0.94 79.20 76.55
2 Claveria 3.58 0.62 765.42 132.05
3 El Salvador City 9.11 10.46 132.43 151.99
4 Gitagum 0.37 0.85 41.11 94.73
5 Initao 4.26 3.83 63.76 57.30
6 Jasaan 4.90 6.36 63.44 82.36
7 Laguindingan 0.69 4.13 37.19 222.13
8 Libertad 0.45 1.99 40.15 178.66
9 Lugait 1.98 7.23 12.29 44.76
10 Manticao 9.31 7.57 100.77 81.92
11 Naawan 10.00 11.30 59.78 67.55
12 Opol 9.55 5.45 133.64 76.31
13 Tagoloan 27.45 23.31 28.28 24.02
14 Villanueva 10.21 20.93 35.84 73.44
15 Cagayan de Oro 55.94 13.55 384.79 93.22
City
TOTAL 226.16 6.43 3,104.93 88.32
SOURCE: DENR-LMS X

Based on the flood hazard map prepared by MGB-X, it revealed that 6.43 percent of the province’s total area is susceptible to
flooding. Cagayan de Oro City is on top of the cities/municipalities that may greatly be affected having 13.55 percent of its total
land area susceptible to floods. Selected areas in Cagayan de Oro City experienced low to high level flooding, which as
observed do not subside for several hours especially during prolong and intense heavy rainfall or extreme weather condition,
and due to poor drainage system and siltation of the Cagayan de Oro River. As shown in the table above, among the cities and
municipalities of the province, Claveria, which is the only land-locked municipality, has the largest area of 579.63.

On the rain-induced landslide map prepared by MGB-X, 88.32 percent of the province’s land area is prone to rain-induced
landslide (RIL), which is equivalent to 3,105 square kilometers. Of the 3,105 sq.km prone to RIL, about 36 percent is highly
susceptible due to each topographic configuration. Only the municipalities of Binuangan, Laguindingan and Sugbongcogon do
not have areas that are classified as highly susceptible to RIL.
 Figure 1.10 Rain Induced Landslide Map of
Misamis Oriental
Table Number 1.14 Areas Prone to Natural Hazards by Municipality/City in Misamis Oriental
MUNICIPALITY FLOOD-PRONE COASTAL ZONES BUFFER OF PRIME LAND
AREAS AREAS RIVER/CREEKS (in has)
(in has.) (in has) (in has)
District I
Balingasag 2,068.70 1,200.00 237.10 670.00
Balingoan 55.22 290.00 87.30 -
Lagonglong 366.92 600.00 37.40 266.00
Salay * 600.00 249.60 29.00
Binuangan * 300.00 43.70 0.00
Sugbongcogon * 550.00 81.10 0.00
Kinoguitan * 650.00 156.00 0.00
Talisayan 77.15 1,380.00 174.70 0.00
Medina 498.44 1,400.00 180.90 0.00
Magsaysay 679.95 2,430.00 112.30 986.00
Gingoog City 1,831.70 2,300.00 885.70 3,930.00
District II
Alubijid 551.63 800.00 230.80 566.00
Claveria 0.00 0.00 430.60 2,918.00
El Salvador 100.46 930.00 262.00 876.00
Gitagum 287.60 430.00 74.90 491.00
Initao 141.60 1,300.00 299.40 0.00
Jasaan 417.69 1,200.00 124.80 790.00
Laguindingan 241.30 800.00 62.40 683.00
Libertad 160.42 500.00 174.70 523.00
Lugait 83.72 600.00 43.70 0.00
Manticao 163.00 400.00 205.90 92.00
Naawan 52.04 500.00 279.50 150.00
Opol 561.07 580.00 748.70 743.00
Tagoloan 1,225.86 570.00 90.50 0.00
Villanueva 0.00 400.00 112.30 246.00
TOTAL 9,564.47 20,710.00 5,386.00 13,959.00
SOURCE: DENR – MGB – X / PPFP

Table Number 1.15 SUMMARY OF AREAS SUSCEPTIBLE TO NATURAL HAZARDS,

MISAMIS ORIENTAL

MUNICIPALITY FLOOD RAIN- STORM GROUND LIQUEFACTION EARTHQUAKE-

INDUCED SURGE SHAKING INDUCED
LANDSLIDE LANDSLIDE
District I
Balingasag ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ ⁄
Balingoan / / / /
Lagonglong / / / / /
Salay / / / / / /
Binuangan / / / / /
Sugbongcogon / / / /
Kinoguitan / / / /
Talisayan / / / /
Medina / / / /
Magsaysay / / / / /
Gingoog City / / / / / /
District II
Alubijid ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ ⁄ ⁄
Claveria / / / /
El Salvador / / / / / /
Gitagum / / / / /
Initao / / / / / /
Jasaan / / / / / /
Laguindingan / / / / /
Libertad / / / / /
Lugait / / / / /
Manticao / / / / /
Naawan / / / /
Opol / / / / / /
Tagoloan / / / / / /
Villanueva / / / / / /
SOURCE: PPDO Misamis Oriental
 Figure 1.11 Multi-Hazard Map in Misamis Oriental

1.1.6 Agricultural Area Disaggregated by Commodities

Base on production data of PSA in the province for CY2021 the dominant crops was, staple/ grains was corn, banana for
fruits, tomato for vegetables, sweet potato for rootcrops, cassava and coconut for industrial crops. However, priority
commodities of MIsamis Oriental identified during the PCIP consultation among the municipalities/cities are cacao,
banana, cassava, abaca, coffee, mango, dairy cattle and swine.
 Table 1.16 Dominant Crops in Misamis Oriental CY2021

Commodities Land Utilization Production (Mt.) Rank base on Production

Grains/Staple Food
Rice 2,207.20 20,929 2nd
Corn 30,575.50 119,937 1st
Fruits :
Banana 11,147.64 2,016,302.92 1st
Mango 2,623.75 52,477.60 3rd
Lanzones 832.25 2,913.11 5th
Papaya 1,316.06 39,481.90 4th
Pineapple 37,063 1,667,844.69 2nd
Durian 55.05 2,196.05 7th
Watermelon 55.90 2,515.88 6th
Vegetable
Ampalaya 308.5 3,083.46 8th
Pole Sitao 422.80 3,382.42 7th
Squash 707.55 17,689.28 2nd
Eggplant 958.75 5,752.49 4th
okra 399.59 1,997.93 10th
Gourd 501.75 4,011.46 6th
Pechay 827.95 4,139.22 5th
Cabbage 981.55 7,852.46 3rd
Lettuce 218.05 1,744.59 10th
Tomato 1929.50 48,233.34 1st
Pepper 320.25 2,561.38 9th
Root Crops
Gabi 230.75 3,460.05 4th
Irish Potato 395.75 5,869.93 2nd
Sweet Potato 1,19.55 40,489.36 1st
Ginger 420.75 5,385.65 3rd
Peanut 530.05 2,650.24 5th
Industrial Crops
Coconut 101,698 600,629.61 2nd
Cassava 15,019.75 675,887.72 1st
Abaca 4,722.08 4,722.08 5th
Cacao 1,903.73 286.45 7th
Coffee 2,291.38 5,758.59 4th
Rubber 1,174.50 11,740.09 3rd
Native Tobacco 1,264.00 672 6th
Source: PSA-X

Table No. 1.17 Production of the Different Commodities in Misamis Oriental CY2018-2022

COMMODITY 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Grains/Staple Crops
Rice 24,864 24,661.58 24,224.22 20,929 .04 22,125.37
Corn 109,032 110,748 114,164 .87 119,937.00 119,940.85
VEGETABLES
Ampalaya 6,602.30 1,642.50 1,674.37 1,563 1,621.00
Broccoli 45.7 46.60 46.63 46.26 80.25
Cabbage 698.50 743.00 773.83 795.67 864.35
Carrots 25.75 27.58 29.78 27.18 28.02
Cauliflower 61.55 62.55 59.28 60.60 71.30
Eggplant 1,643 1,795.00 1,845.99 1,841.00 2,297.71
Ginger 221.25 220.25 220.66 218.66 270.19
Gourd 1,295.20 1,320.30 1,318.08 1,676.61 1,955.93
Habitchuelas 241.05 262.20 264.28 275.42 332.30
Kangkong 1,165.50 1,130.25 1,108.85 1,123.25 1,417.42
Lettuce 30.43 32.42 32.27 29.07 33.70
Mongo 42.60 46.25 50.04 52.76 58.25
Okra 399.70 399.25 406.80 393.26 405.52
 Peanut 40.90 45.60 44.91 44.97 51.49
Pechay 592.05 631.10 656.09 647.69 672.04
Pepper 206.20 216.15 224.98 198.92 228.27
Squash 1,786.00 1,919.00 1,915.78 1,896.24 2,103.49
String beans 1,751.50 1,789.95 1,829.78 1,894.59 2,367.60
Tomato 6,394 6,100 5,621.32 5,922.91 6,895.23
Radish 36.05 37.35 38.60 38.88 76.10
Banana Blossom 989 996 947.79 1,006.19 1,020.63
Chayote 1,026 1,049.50 1,054.89 1,065.99 1,054.00
Camote Tops 2,182 2,193 2,181.36 2,041.62 2,405.95
Patola 115.50 114.05 113.30 105.72 109.63
Cucumber 275 279.00 278.15 284.94 322.48
Alogbati 1,675 1,679 1,681.55 1,683.47 2,156.73
Bamboo Shoots 324.50 327.25 947.79 1,006.19 1,020.63
Onion Leeks 404.85 390 392.75 404.40 483.42
ROOTCROPS
Camote 3,786 3,795 4,017.71 3,969.26 4,294.24
Cassava 184,172 170,242 168,555.28 157,304.71 166,269.95
Gabi 359 364 363.30 428.11 513.22
Ubi 112.5 109.85 109.24 109.70 138.11
FRUIT TREES
Banana 222,789.75 218,990.25 216,754.82 217,994.57 235,414.99
Calamansi 82.80 85.65 86.60 86.27 116.86
Durian 127.22 137.00 138.98 130.80 97.79
Lanzones 1,719.75 1,800.00 1,770.09 1,525.16 321.20
Mango 17,550.17 18,835.54 19,190.83 18,642.90 18,600.10
Mangosteen 14.55 15.25 17.06 16.16 16.10
Papaya 32,194.41 32,901.71 32,580.01 34,484.83 30,766.57
Pineapple 71,728 70,516 68,878.71 64,004.25 74,564.59
Pomelo 92.70 95.25 95.61 100.11 97.06
Rambutan 61.13 81.75 88.58 89.30 163.60
Watermelon 702.75 804.00 871.65 978.26 911.52
Abocado 54.18 53.25 54.27 54.50 62.76
Jackfruit ripe 128.50 127.25 128.75 106.78 111.69
COMMODITY 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
INDUSTRIAL CROPS
Abaca 649.00 636.00 644.65 648.54 694.82
Coconut with husk 539,804 542,070.79 568,485.70 568,693.90 578,115.17
Coco Sap/Tuba 9,369 9,425 9,085.28 8,797.77 7,761.23
Coco Coir 415 407 394.31 394.08 493.18
Cacao 13.20 18.25 21.23 24.46 40.80
Cashew 16.82 16.07 16.11 10.35 9.92
Coffee 661.88 670.23 674.43 689.74 415.37
Tobacco 2,823 2,376.06 2,120.52 2,194.53 2,337.63
Tobacco Native/Batik 1,033 1,238 2,120.52 2,194.53 2,337.63
Tobacco Virginia 1,790 1,138.06 - - -
Source: PSA – National Office.

 ROAD DENSITY DATA

The PRNDP stated that the provincial access roads are widely distributed all over the municipalities of Misamis Oriental. The
municipality of Opol has the highest number of roads interlinking to adjacent municipalities totaling to 97.67 kilometers, while
the town of Tagoloan, having a smaller number of barangays, has the lowest number of access road totaling only to 12.64
kilometers. The provincial roads connect one municipality to another or to national highway.

Out of 1,066.541 km, fifty four percent (54%) or 577.38kms. of provincial roads are in fair to good condition. Forty six percent
(46%) or 489.157kms are in poor to bad condition. The municipalities of Magsaysay, Opol, Balingasag and Alubijid have the
highest length of fair road having an aggregate total of 193.047 kilometers or 18.10% of the total road network. Meanwhile, the
municipalities of Opol, Manticao and Balingasag have the longest length of road in poor to bad condition totaling 128.92
kilometres or 12.088% of the road network condition.

Table No. 1.18 shows that out of the 3,481.754 kilometers of local roads, 32% are in good, 29% represents fair, 9%
corresponds to poor and 30% are in bad condition.
 TABLE NO. 1.18: TOTAL ROAD NETWORK BY LENGTH, BY SURFACE CONDITION, & DENSITY BY
MUNICIPALITY/CITY, MISAMIS ORIENTAL 2019

MUNICIPALITY/ LENGTH OF ROAD SURFACE CONDITION Total Total Area Density

CITY GOOD FAIR POOR BAD (km) (%) (Sq. km)
Magsaysay 26.829 14.806 21.090 115.714 178.439 5.12% 143.140 1.247
Gingoog City 158.445 259.173 12.395 33.252 463.265 13.31% 568.440 0.815
Medina 9.607 92.228 20.612 122.447 3.52% 148.290 0.826
Talisayan 37.994 40.740 11.118 11.718 101.570 2.92% 140.330 0.724
Balingoan 22.471 11.602 18.028 10.414 62.514 1.80% 57.800 1.082
Kinoguitan 35.011 9.940 18.551 26.141 89.644 2.57% 42.560 2.106
Sugbongcogon 27.869 0.661 22.436 11.636 62.602 1.80% 26.500 2.362
Binuangan 20.913 11.764 2.424 35.101 1.01% 30.430 1.154
Salay 61.451 1.105 35.397 11.199 109.152 3.13% 92.790 1.176
Lagonglong 23.934 22.597 36.092 1.514 84.137 2.42% 83.780 1.004
Balingasag 80.783 26.616 50.966 37.202 195.568 5.62% 147.110 1.329
Jasaan 35.684 20.384 1.422 59.830 117.319 3.37% 77.020 1.523
Claveria 56.849 7.805 0.138 440.379 505.172 14.51% 579.630 0.872
Villanueva 45.362 36.896 9.034 91.291 2.62% 48.800 1.871
Tagoloan 27.221 67.078 5.148 12.750 112.197 3.22% 117.730 0.953
MUNICIPALITY/ LENGTH OF ROAD SURFACE CONDITION Total Total Area Density
CITY GOOD FAIR POOR BAD (km) (%) (Sq. km)
Magsaysay 26.829 14.806 21.090 115.714 178.439 5.12% 143.140 1.247
Opol 73.406 75.121 6.186 73.645 228.358 6.56% 175.130 1.304
El Salvador City 86.414 69.661 0.009 2.271 158.354 4.55% 87.130 1.817
Alubijid 14.546 93.208 5.037 7.814 120.604 3.46% 103.450 1.166
Laguindingan 32.638 48.548 0.089 32.834 114.109 3.28% 16.740 6.817
Gitagum 50.509 18.038 3.319 71.866 2.06% 43.400 1.656
Libertad 12.573 4.215 42.774 11.852 71.416 2.05% 22.470 3.178
Initao 37.889 29.013 12.968 24.326 104.196 2.99% 111.270 0.936
Naawan 53.753 10.869 1.189 6.268 72.079 2.07% 88.500 0.814
Manticao 33.680 38.260 3.663 48.649 124.252 3.57% 123.010 1.010
Lugait 32.004 2.218 4.626 47.254 86.101 2.47% 27.450 3.137
1,097.836 1,012.544 321.676 1,049.698 3,481.754 100.00% 3,102.900 40.879
TOTAL 31.53112 29.08143 9.238907 30.14854
SOURCE: PEO/PPDO/DILG-GIS

TABLE NO. 1.19: TOTAL ROAD NETWORK BY CLASSIFICATION, LENGTH & CONDITION IN
MISAMIS ORIENTAL

Classification & National Provincial Municipal City Barangay Total % SHARE

Condition
Concrete 270.589 363.043 117.476 222.097 347.488 1,320.693 32.880
Asphalt 9.774 - - 53.935 0.214 63.923 1.591
Gravel 14.931 457.719 28.605 111.152 690.519 1,302.926 32.438
Earth 7.039 245.779 15.465 118.517 942.305 1,329.105 33.090
Total 302.333 1,066.541 161.546 505.701 1,980.526 4,016.647 100.000
% SHARE 7.527 26.553 4.022 12.590 49.308 100.000
Source: PEO

In preparation to certain risks through Climate Change, alternate access roads are constructed when main highways become
inaccessible due to floods or storm surges, such as the Alae-Gusa circumferential road.

In the total length area of the provincial road, 14 municipalities are highly susceptible to RIL hazards which composed of 80
kilometers. The longest stretch of provincial road which is prone to RIL hazards are the municipalities of Libertad and Manticao,
while the lowest length is Gitagum and Jasaan of the 14 municipalities. Most of the municipalities exposed to RIL hazards
belong to the West part of the province as it is less forested and have high presence of small-scale mining. The municipalities
of Alubijid and Opol, including the city of El Salvador have the lowest exposure of land area to RIL hazards though it also has
one of the highest lengths of provincial road.

Spanning across municipalities of Tagoloan and Villanueva, the 3,000-hectare PhiVIDeC Industrial Estate is home of about 150
major industry locators in the province including the Mindanao International Container Port and the STEAG Coal-fired Power
Plant. The establishment of Multi-Industry Zone is also proposed to be established in the municipality of Balingasag.
Other major industries are in the emerging growth areas of Jasaan, El Salvador, Lugait and Manticao. Massive agricultural
products are sourced in Balingasag and Gingoog City.

Figure 1.12 Road Network Map of Mis. Or.

 Road Network Leading to Economic Zones

The province is endowed with the presence of economic zones and industrial centers that cater to both manufacturing
and processing industries. There is an economic complementation and synergy between the surrounding municipalities of
 the province and Cagayan de Oro City. The province is designated as the Regional Industrial Center (RIC) with the
presence of the PHIVIDEC Industrial Estate, the country’s oldest and largest industrial estate covering an area of some
3,000 hectares within portions of Tagoloan and Villanueva municipalities which are the two most immediate municipalities
east of Cagayan de Oro City. An Economic Zone is also operation under the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA)
at Jasaan municipality. In addition, there is another ecozone in Barangay Poblacion, Manticao with an area of 28.89
hectares, also intended for manufacturing.

Figure 1.13 Local Road Network Leading to

Commodities in Mis. Or.

1.2 Agriculture and Agribusiness Profile

1.2.1 Agricultural Area

Misamis Oriental has a total agricultural area of 194,733.02 hectares or 49.57% of its total land area which is 392,850 hectares
which include the cities of Cagayan de Oro City, Gingoog City and El Salvador City. Gingoog City has the biggest agricultural
area covering 35,109.61 hectares or 18% of the total agricultural area of the province followed by Claveria with 20,989.26
hectares or 10.78% of the total agricultural area of the province. The municipality with smallest agricultural land area in District
1 is Sugbongcogon of 1,240.05 hectares, while in District 2 is Lugait with 935.46 hectares.

Table 1..2.1 Total Agricultural Area of Misamis Oriental by Municipality & City

Misamis Oriental Agricultural Area – 194,733.02 including Cagayan de Oro City

Congressional District 1 Congressional District 2
 Municipality Agricultural Area Municipality Agricultural Area
Magsaysay 11,264.27 Jasaan 7,005.46
Gingoog City 35,109.61 Claveria 20,989.26
Medina 14,661.58 Villanueva 950.09
Talisayan 10,954.46 Tagoloan 1,405.61
Balingoan 4,130.61 Opol 7,815.64
Kinoguitan 3,995.53 El Salvador City 5,322.81
Sugbongcogon 1,240.05 Alubijid 9,682.75
Binuangan 2,970.09 Laguindingan 1,578.97
Salay 3,936.56 Gitagum 3,723.82
Lagonglong 5,981.85 Libertad 1,332.08
Balingasag 14,246.54 Initao 3,945.61
Total Agricultural Area District 1 –108,491.15 Naawan 2,572.46
District 3 Manticao 7,345.46
Cagayan de Oro City 11,636.39 Lugait 935.46
Total Agricultural Area District 2 - 74,605.48

1.2.2 Strategic Agriculture & Fisheries Development Zone (SAFDZ)

With the passage of the Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act (AFMA) or R.A. 8435, a Strategic Agriculture and
Fisheries Development Zone (SAFDZ) was identified and delineated. In 2011, the province came up with a total SAFDZ area of
130,499 hectares that constituted 37% of the total land area. However, in the latest updating total SAFDZ area is 116,763.16
hectares which is 67.05% of the total provincial agricultural area. Industrial crops comprising coconut, cacao, coffee, abaca,
tobacco, cassava etc. has the biggest delineated SAFDZ area of 65,033.61 hectares or 56% of the total SAFDZ area of the
province. The smallest is root crops consist of sweet potato, ubi etc of 2,121.45 hectares or 2% of the total SAFDZ area of the
province.

Out of the total delineated SAFDZ area only 65,743.96 hectares 56.3% is utilized and 43.7% is not yet utilized because of the
following issues/ problems in the SAFDZ include lack of capital for production, tenurial problems especially in the Eastern side
of the province, land conversion of irrigated areas to subdivision, high cost of agricultural inputs, low quality of product due to
lack/inadequate post-harvest facility & lack irrigation facilities, shifting to other crops, unpredictable weather condition resulting
to landslides, soil erosion/siltation, occurrence of pest and diseases, lack of water supply both potable water for livestock,
poultry and vegetables garden/small irrigation facilities, bad Farm to Market Road, land conversion for industrial purposes, lack
of processing technology and processing facilities, low market price especially during peak harvest, denuded and depleted
production area and not fully utilized areas for improved forage and pasture for livestock.

Table Number 1.2.2 Strategic Agricultural and Fishery Development Zone Area in Mis. Or.

Commodities Total Status of the Hectares Issues/Problems in the

Area (Hectares) SAFDZs not yet SAFDZ
(Hectares developed
Utilized)
Rice 4,842.25 2,325.15 2,517.10 Lack of capital for production, tennurial
problems, land conversion, high cost of inputs,
and low quality of product due to lack of PHF &
lack irrigation facilities.
Corn 15,345.00 6,721.50 8,623.50 Shifting to other crops such as tobacco,
cassava and pineapple.
Fruits 12,089.00 8,522.35 3,566.65 Unpredictable weather condition resulting to
landslides, soil erosion/ siltation, occurrence of
pest and diseases, lack of capital, high cost of
inputs.
Vegetables 2,253.26 773.16 1,480.10 Tennurial problem, high cost of inputs, lack
production capital, lack of water supply for
vegetables garden/ small irrigation facilities,
inadequate PHF, bad FMR and land
conversion for industrial purposes.
Rootcrops 2,121.45 1,073.45 1,048.00 Bad FMR, lack of processing technology, low
market price, denuded and depleted production
area.
Industrial 65,033.61 37,726.06 27,307.55 Conversion of land for industrial purposes, poor
Crops accessibility of FMR,
inadequate and appropriate production and
PHF, low production, lack of processing
technology and
occurrence of pest and diseases.
Fisheries 3,160.72 54.59 3,106.13 Depleted marine and aquatic resources
Livestock 11,917.87 8,547.70 3,370.17 Not fully utilized for improved forage and
pasture.
TOTAL 116,763.16 65,743.96 51,019.20
Source: PAGRO-MIS

Figure 1.2.1 SAFDZ MAP OF MISAMIS ORIENTAL

 1.2.3 Production Performance

-Palay Production

Misamis Oriental rice production from 2018 to 2021 showed a decrease trend and it increases in 2022 . The cause of which is due
to the inadequate and delayed release of irrigation water primarily contributing to the decrease yield of most of the province’s rice
areas. Also notable is the decrease in the total area harvested of palay from 2018 to 2021 a total decrease of 7.66% and it
increases of around 2.60% was recorded.

Relatively good weather, seed subsidies, and adequate irrigation during the year 2018 contributed to the province’s highest
production of palay which resulted in 24,864 MT. The used of recommended and high-yielding variety of seeds and other production
services are the key factors in the increase of production of the province likewise; sustainable and timely supply of irrigation water is
also a contributor for favorable rice.

TABLE NO. 1.2.3: PALAY PRODUCTION (IN METRIC TONS), AREA HARVESTED (HECTARES) AND
YIELD (MT/HECTARE), MISAMIS ORIENTAL, ANNUAL 2018 TO 2022

Particulars 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Production (MT) 24,864 24,662 24,224 20,929 22,125.37
Irrigated 23,771 23,818 22,896 19,896 20 980.84
Rainfed 1,093 844 1,328 1,033 1,144.53
Area Harvested (ha) 5,976 5,858 5,958 5,518 5,661.62
Irrigated 5,580 5,573 5,456 5,135 5,217.58
Rainfed 396 285 502 383 444.04
Yield 4.16 4.21 4.07 3.79 3.91
Irrigated 4.26 4.27 4.20 3.87 4.02
Rainfed 2.76 2.96 2.65 2.70 2.58
SOURCE: Philippine Statistics Authority – RSSO 10

-Corn Production

In terms of area harvested (has.) for corn in 2021, Misamis Oriental ranks third among the five provinces of the region with a
total share of 12%.

TABLE NO. 1.2.4: CORN PRODUCTION (IN METRIC TONS), AREA HARVESTED (HAS.), BY PROVINCE CY2021

PROVINCE PRODUCTION PROVINCIAL AREA HARVESTED PROVINCIAL

(MT) SHARE % (HA) SHARE %
Bukidnon 951,561 65.40 209,378 54.40
Camiguin 668 0.046 323 0.084
Lanao Del Norte 330,339 22.70 102,414 26.61
Misamis Occidental 52,525 3.61 26,887 6.99
Misamis Oriental 119,937 8.24 45,863 11.92
Region X 1,455,030 99.99 384,865 100.00
Source: PSA-Region X

Most of the yellow corn producers used hybrid corn technology while white corn uses OPV corn technology. One of our
strategies in increasing productivity is thru corn production loan approach, whereby all priority corn intervention will focus on
the all corn areas such as provision of seeds, farm equipment and post-harvest facilities, capability enhancement and techno
demo on corn balanced fertilization.

The total area harvested in 2022 for corn was 46,789.57 hectares with a total production of 119,940.85 MT.

Total corn production of the province form 2018-2022 was increasing. Area harvested has up and down trend,
however, area harvested from 2021 to 2022 was increasing. The average yield was increasing from 2018 to
2021 then it decreases in 2022.
 TABLE NO. 1.2.5: CORN PRODUCTION, AREA HARVESTED (HECTARE) AND YIELD (MT/HECTARE),
MISAMIS ORIENTAL, ANNUAL FROM 2018 TO 2022

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Corn Production (MT) 109,032 110,748 114,164 119,937.00 119,940.85
White 48,590 54,962 53,569 55,475.00 61,759.27
Yellow 60,442 55,786 60,505 64,462.00 58,181.58
Area Harvested (HA) 42,630 42,472 42, 774 45,863.00 46,789.57
White 31,134 31,511 31,158 32,106.00 34,034.31
Yellow 11,496 10,961 11,616 13,757.00 12,755.26
Yield/Hectare 2.56 2.61 2.67 2.62 2.56
White 1.56 1.74 1.72 1.73 1.81
Yellow 5.26 5.09 5.21 4.69 4.56
Source: PSA-Region X

-High Value Crop Production

The annual production of vegetable from 2018 to 2022 was increasing. Bigger increased was between 2021 and 2022 with
an increase of about 14.53%. This was attributed to the increase in the production of selected commodities like tomato,
squash, eggplant, string beans, alogbati, ampalaya, upo/gourd, chayote, camote tops, kangkong, banana blooms,
malunggay leaves and bamboo shoots.

While the production of root crops in from 2018 to 2021 was decreasing and it increases in 2022. Among root crops cassava
contributed the decreased because area harvested decreases due to change of crop.

Growth in production for fruits in Misamis Oriental shows an increase of about 60.9% from CY2019 to 2020. This increase in
production was due to the contribution of Pineapple, Banana, Papaya, and mango. Comparing to the production of fruits in
Northern Mindanao, the total production in 2019 has increase by .81%.

While the industrial crops in Northern Mindanao have increased its production by 24.94% due to the increase in harvest of
abaca, coffee, sugarcane, compared to 2019 which has a decrease production by 10.25% due to the decreased of harvest
for sugarcane. For Misamis oriental industrial crops production performance for the last five (5) years was increasing. The
increases were attributed by coconut and tobacco.

Table Number 1.2.6 High Value Crops Production in Misamis Oriental 2018 to 2022

COMMODITY 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

VEGETABLES 28,442.83 28,671.17 28,940.86 29,396.13 33,668.77

Ampalaya 1,602.30 1,642.50 1,674.37 1,563.00 1,621.99

Alogbati 1,675.00 1,679.50 1,681.55 1,683.47 2,156.73
Broccoli 45.70 46.60 46.63 46.26 80.25
Cabbage 698.50 743.00 773.83 795.67 864.35
Cauliflower 61.55 62.55 59.28 60.60 71.30
Cucumber 275.00 279.00 278.15 284.94 322.48
Eggplant 1,643.00 1,795 1,845.99 1,841.00 2,297.71
Gabi 359.00 364.00 363.30 428.11 513.22
Gourd 1,295.20 1,320.30 1,318.08 1,676.61 1,955.93
Habitchuelas 241.05 262.20 264.28 275.42 332.30
Lettuce 30.43 32.42 32.27 29.07 33.70
Okra 399.70 399.25 406.80 393.26 405.52
Pechay 592.05 631.10 656.09 647.69 672.04
Pepper 206.20 216.15 224.98 198,92 228.27
Squash 1,786.00 1,919.00 1,915.78 1,896.24 2,103.49
String beans 1,751.50 1,789.95 1,829.78 1,894.59 2,367.60
Tomato 6,394.00 6,100.00 5,621.32 5,922.91 6,895.23
Chayote 1,026.00 1,049.50 1,054.89 1,065.99 1,054.00
Camote Tops 2,182.00 2,193.00 2,181.36 2,041.62 2,405.95
 Onion leeks 404.85 390.00 392.75 404.40 483.42
Patola 115.50 114.05 113.30 105.72 109.63
Kangkong 1,165.50 1,130.25 1,108.85 1,123.25 1,417.42
Mung Beans/Mongo 42.60 46.25 50.04 52.76 58.25
Peanuts 40.90 45.60 44.91 44.97 51.49
Malunggay leaves 3,043 3,047.00 3,055.00 3,057.05 3,075.10
Bamboo Shoots 324.50 327.25 947.79 1,006.19 1,020.63
Banana Blooms 989.00 996.00 947.79 1,006.19 1,020.63
Gabi leaves with stem 52.80 49.75 51.70 49.15 50.14
ROOTCROPS 188,712.55 174,796.03 173,334.57 162,096.50 171,589.83

Sweet Potato/ Camote 3,786.00 3,795.00 4,017.71 3,969.26 4,294.24

Cassava 184,172.00 170,242.00 168,555.28 157,304.71 166,269.95
Ginger 221.25 220.25 220.66 218.66 270.19
Ubi 112.50 109.85 109.24 109.70 138.11
Radish 36.05 37.35 38.60 38.88 76.10
Carrots 25.75 27.58 29.78 27.18 28.02
Taro/ Gabi 359.00 364.00 363.30 428.11 513.22

COMMODITY 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

FRUIT CROPS 347,317.35 344,549.27 2,101,177.55 2,136,630.25 2,163,318.78

Banana 222,789.75 218,990.25 1,977,157.06 2,016,302.92 2,037,380.83

Calamansi 82.80 85.65 86.60 86.27 116.86
Durian 127.22 137.00 138.98 130.80 97.79
Lanzones 1,719.75 1,800.00 1,770.09 1,525.16 321.20
Mango 17,550.17 18,835.54 19,190.83 18,642.90 18,600.10
Mangosteen 14.55 15.25 17.06 16.16 16.10
Papaya 32,194.41 32,901.71 32,580.01 34,484.83 30,766.57
Pineapple 71,728.00 70,516.00 68,878.71 64,004.25 74,564.59
Pomelo 92.70 95.25 95.61 100.11 97.06
Rambutan 61.30 81.75 88.58 89.30 163.60
Watermelon 702.75 804.00 871.65 978.26 911.52
Avocado 54.18 53.25 54.27 54.50 62.76
Jack Fruit 128.50 127.25 128.75 106.78 111.69
Guava 4.07 4.22 4.17 3.32 5.80
Melon 8.00 10.80 19.76 19.82 19.41
Golden Melon 58.25 84.20 87.45 72.71 67.80
Dragon Fruit 0.95 7.15 7.97 12.16 15.10

INDUSTRIAL
554,256.20 556,128.40 581,936.55 581,955.34 590,427.81

Abaca 649.00 636.00 644.64 648.54 694.82

Cacao 13.20 18.25 21.23 24.46 40.80
Cashew 16.82 16.07 16.11 10.35 9.92
Coffee 661.88 670.23 674.43 689.74 415.37
Coconut 539,804.00 542,070.79 568,485.70 568,693.90 578,115.17
COCO Sap/ Tuba 9,369.00 9,425.00 9,085.28 8,797.77 7,761.23
Coir 415.00 407.00 394.31 394.08 493.18
Rubber 504.30 509.00 494.33 501.97 559.69
Tobacco 2,823.00 2,376.06 2,120.52 2,194.53 2,337.63
Source: PSA - X.

-Livestock & Poultry Production

Livestock and poultry industry is also one of the major industries that contributed to the gross national product of Mis. Or. and
one of the major sources of farmers’ income. The Provincial Veterinary Office is mandated to ensure food security through a
disease-free and sufficient livestock and poultry industry. Livestock and poultry commonly raised in the province includes
cattle, carabao, goat, hogs, broiler and native chicken for meat, layer chicken for table eggs and ducks both for meat and egg
production. Cattle are mainly utilized as draft animals by upland farmers while carabao is commonly utilized by lowland
farmers. A 0.25 ha pasture area per cattle/carabao compliments the standard minimum requirement to support the production.
 Raising goats are now becoming popular due to the increasing demand for chevon as source of protein. The province was
affected by African swine fever in 2021 which is expected to affect the hog inventory in 2021-2022. Several hogs died while
hogs exposed to the virus were culled to contain the disease. Due to this outbreak affecting hog raisers, the provincial
government initiates to find alternative meat source which is found in rabbit. Recently, the Rabbit Raisers and Breeders
Association of Misamis Oriental launched the Rabbit Raising and Meat Production to promote rabbit meat as alternative
instead of hogs/swine. The association is composed of 129 members from the different municipalities in Misamis Oriental and
City of Cagayan de Oro having a total population of 1,419 heads. There is an increase in the duck inventory with the
introduction of the livelihood project through duck egg production of the provincial government which started in 2015.

Table No. 1.2.7 Comparative Data of Livestock and Poultry Inventory in Misamis Oriental from CY2016-2020

LIVESTOCK/ POULTRY 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Carabao 9,860 9,672 9,620 9,034 9,176
Cattle 81,736 72,148 73,726 61,686 63,768
Goat 71,308 58,497 59,538 59,673 58,825
Swine 191,694 193,385 191,778 187,621 194,762
Chicken 6,986,799 7,424,138 6,356,480 6,062,239 5,588,050
Duck 25,930 38,805 45,323 43,163 38,644
TOTAL 7,341,397 7,796,645 6,670,065 6,423,416 5,953,225
Source: PSA 2016-2020 Livestock & Poultry Statistic of the Philippines

Livestock and Poultry production performance in Misamis Oriental has up and down trend from 2016-2020. The trend was
brought about the effect brought about by African Swine Fever (ASF) that hits the province. However, there no significant
increase and decrease in production was a result of the combined efforts of the government and private sector, particularly on
the provision of drugs and biologics to the Provincial Veterinary Offices for the maintenance of animals’ health including
animal dispersal projects as livelihood support to the farmers. The LGUs' continuing technical and material assistance to
farmers also contributed to this. The distribution of free-range chicken facilitated the increase as additional stocks were added
to the populace. The increase in the production of duck eggs was due to the distribution of Ready To Lay (RTL) ducks coupled
with feeds, drugs, and incubators plus market facilitation as part of the Itikan sa Kalambuan Project of the province.

TABLE NO. 1.2.8: LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY PRODUCTION VOLUME (METRIC TONS, LIVE WEIGHT),
MISAMIS ORIENTAL, FROM 2016 TO 2020 (ANNUAL)

ANIMAL TYPE 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Carabao 1,062 1,147 1,201 1,145 802
Cattle 10,397 9,710 10,273 8,921 6,709
Swine 39,339 39,852 40,433 38,894 38,872
Goat 2,526 2,064 2,013 2,066 1,679
Chicken 77,270 78,933 80,476 81,831 80,268
Duck 249 235 250 262 214
Chicken Eggs 7,702 9,636 10,763 11,244 11,640
Duck Eggs 53 85 79 81 81
TOTAL 130,647 141,662 145,488 144,444 140,265
Source: PSA 2016-2020 Livestock & Poultry Statistic of the Philippines

Total chicken inventory in Misamis Oriental has continuously declined starting 2017 with 7.8% reduction in 2020 compared to
previous year data. Broiler chicken accounts for 50.7% of the entire inventory while layer and native chicken accounts for 13.7%
and 35.7% respectively.

TABLE NO. 1.2.9: CHICKEN INVENTORY BY TYPE (NUMBER OF HEADS), MISAMIS ORIENTAL FROM 2016
TO 2020

TYPE 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Broiler 5,015,000 5,309,790 4,023,210 3,585,415 2,832,580
 Layer 569,880 694,043 815,064 807,476 760,125
Native/Improved 1,401,919 1,420,305 1,518,206 1,669,348 1,995,345
TOTAL 6,986,799 7,424,138 6,356,480 6,062,239 5,588,050
Source: PSA 2016-2020 Livestock & Poultry Statistic of the Philippines

Majority of the livestock animals in the province are raised in backyard farms. Carabao raised in backyard farms shared almost
100%, backyard cattle shared 98% and backyard goat shared 96%. For swine, 83% were raised in the backyard while 98% of
ducks are also raised in the backyard.

TABLE NO. 1.2.10: INVENTORY OF LIVESTOCK AND POULTRY BY TYPE OF FARM (NUMBER OF HEADS),
MISAMIS ORIENTAL FROM 2016-2020

KIND/ 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

TYPE OF FARM
Carabao
Backyard 9,860 9,672 9,620 9,034 9,176
Commercial 0 0 0 0 0
Cattle
Backyard 80,121 70,490 72,133 60,495 62,203
Commercial 1,615 1,658 1,593 1,191 1,565
Goat
Backyard 69,533 56,638 57,140 57,795 56,750
Commercial 1,775 1,859 2,398 1,878 2,075
Hog
Backyard 164,963 167,307 167,012 162,333 162,550
Commercial 26,731 26,078 24,766 25,288 32,212
Duck
Backyard 24,578 33,470 40,000 38,000 37,724
Commercial 1,352 5,335 5,323 5,163 920
Source: PSA 2016-2020 Livestock & Poultry Statistic of the Philippines

The number of birds slaughtered in Poultry Dressing Plant was at 61 million on the average, the highest in Region X owing to the
presence of 10 private poultry dressing plants operating in the province. One private abattoir operates in the province owned by
San Miguel Inc.-Meat Business while most of the livestock are slaughtered in Locally Registered Meat Establishment in the
Municipalities.

TABLE NO. 1.2.11: ANIMAL SLAUGHTERED IN ABATTOIRS/DRESSING PLANTS (NUMBER OF

HEADS), BY TYPE OF ANIMAL, MISAMIS ORIENTAL, FROM 2016-2020

ANIMAL 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Carabao 475 863 875 942 391

Cattle 18,031 17,514 18,179 19,043 22,918
Swine 262,399 270,178 301,684 273,164 279,552
Goat 1,621 1,552 1,248 1,534 789
Chicken 56,250,765 57,098,449 60,623,259 68,507,454 65,639,513
Source: PSA X

-Fisheries and Aquamarine

Except for the landlocked municipality of Claveria, all twenty-three (23) municipalities are located along the coastline, hence, a
good number of families depend on fishing as their major source of income. The province has three (3) fishing grounds -
Macajalar, Gingoog and Balingasag - but with insufficient production. Thus, it must continually depend on the steady supply of
fish from Zamboanga, Bohol, Cotabato and the Paguil Bay Area.

The volume of fisheries production in Misamis Oriental dropped to 12,080.19 metric tons in 2021. A decline of 18.52 percent
compared to 14,826.06 metrics tons fisheries production in 2020.

Among the subsectors, aquaculture had a growth rate which was recorded at 12.28 percent, that is, equivalent to 154.96
metric tons. Commercial fisheries and municipal fisheries declined by 18.85 percent and 23.78 percent, respectively, incurring
a combined loss of 2,900.83 metric Tons.

TABLE NO. 1.2.12: FISH PRODUCTION BY TYPE OF PRODUCTION (MT), MISAMIS ORIENTAL,
FROM 2020 TO 2ND QUARTER OF 2022

SUBSECTOR 2020 2021 As of 2nd Quaretr 2022

Commercial 6,603.43 5,358.06 1,558.95
Municipal 6,961.72 5,306.26 2,986.79
Aquaculture 1,260.91 1,415.87 485.81
Overall 14,826.06 12,080.19 5,031.55
SOURCE: PSA - OpenSTAT Report

Table 1.2.13 shows the registered boats in Misamis Oriental from 2017 to 2021, motorized banca registered highest recorded
in 2017 which is located in Laguindingan, Binuangan, El Salvador City, Medina, Sugbongcogon and Villanueva. No boat
registered in 2021. Non-Motorized banca, recorded last 2017 the biggest banca registered in the same municipality/ city in the
province except Medina. There was no banca registered 2019 and 2021.

TABLE NO. 1 2.13: REGISTERED BOATS IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL, 2017 – 2021

MUNICIPALITY MOTORIZED NON-MOTORIZED
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Alubijid - - - - - - - - - -
Balingasag - - - - - - - - - -
Balingoan - - - - - - - - - -
Binuangan 21 1 - - - 1 - - - -
El Salvador 24 - 1 - - 3 - - - -
Gingoog - 2 - - - - 1 - - -
Gitagum - - - - - - - - - -
Initao - - - - - - - - - -
Jasaan - - 3 2 - - - 1 - -
Kinoguitan - - - - - - - - - -
Lagonglong - - - - - - - - - -
Laguindingan 32 - - - - 12 - - - -
Libertad - - - - - - - - - -
Magsaysay - - - - - - - - - -
Manticao - - 35 - - - - 6 - -
Medina 5 6 - - - 5 7 - - -
Naawan - - - - - - - - - -
Opol - - - - - - - - - -
Salay - - - - - - - - - -
Sugbongcogon 19 1 - - - 2 - - - -
Tagoloan - - - - - - - - - -
Talisayan - - - - - - - - - -
Villanueva 6 1 - - - - - - - -
TOTAL 109 11 39 2 0 23 8 7 0 0
SOURCE: Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources – X

The fisherfolks registered highest in 2021 this was because the promotion of fisherfolks registration of RSBSA. Libertad has
the highest fisherfolks about 251.
Table No.. 1.2.14: REGISTERED FISHERFOLK IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL, FROM 2017-2021
MUNICIPALITY 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Alubijid 44 22 3 17 29
Balingasag 6 4 2 20 33
Balingoan - 9 - - -
Binuangan 14 1 3 53
El Salvador 75 105 13 90 51
Gingoog 45 180 6 3 10
Gitagum 10 18 1 21 74
Initao 144 - 14 - 63
Jasaan 89 65 - 21 74
Kinoguitan - - - - -
Lagonglong - 2 - - -
Laguindingan - 24 2 5 -
Libertad - 2 - - 251
Lugait - - - 23 5
Magsaysay - - 3 12 12
Manticao 243 74 6 - 39
Medina 62 26 7 114 95
Naawan 3 11 1 23 38
Opol 38 61 42 - 172
MUNICIPALITY 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Salay 3 - - - -
Sugbongcogon 17 9 2 - 9
Tagoloan 6 5 1 - 25
Talisayan 27 - 4 3 99
Villanueva 47 k81 1 - 65
TOTAL 873 617 109 355 1,197

1.2.4 Agribusiness

Misamis Oriental is an agri-industrial province since 85% household main incomes depend on agriculture and fishery
enterprise/industry. There are 146,863 household engaged in farming and fisherfolks. 124,833 household involved in
farming enterprise and 22,030 household engage in fishing enterprise. During the strategic planning of the Provincial
Agriculture Sector it was found out, average productivity of the major commodities below the average and income of farmers
was below poverty line.

The factors or elements that contribute with low productivity and income were high cost of inputs, lack of quality seeds and
planting materials, lack of labor services especially during land preparation and harvesting, soil depletion, lack of farm
equipment and machineries, lack of post-harvest facilities, low buying price of agri products, limited access to the market,
inaccessible farm to market road, unpredictable weather condition, land conversion and change of crops from corn to
tobacco/ fruits to industrial crops like falcate. For livestock sector are high price of concentrate, lack of breeding stock, lack of
processing center, unstable market price and poor nutrition especially for large animals because lack of forage and pasture.
In the fishery sector in marine capture fishing inappropriate/insufficient fishing gear /paraphernalia, lack of post-harvest/
processing facilities, marketing were monopolize by middle men, for seaweeds production are lack of seaweeds propagules,
ice-ice diseases, unpredictable weather condition and lack of drying and processing facilities, for cultured fishing lack of
stocks and lack of knowledge for fisherfolks.

However, Misamis Oriental is self-sufficient in some agricultural crops such as corn, fruits (banana, mango, pineapple, and
papaya), vegetable and poultry. Locally export products are corn, banana, mango, papaya, vegetable, cattle, chicken and
swine, even with the presence of several constraints/gaps.

Agri stakeholders consultation of the province was conducted and were able to prioritize top commodities of the province
base on three (3) criteria namely; suitability 20%, market potential 40% and no. of growers/farmers 40%. Thus, the following
fifteen (15) commodity of the province are as follows; coconut, corn, banana, cassava, rice, poultry, vegetable, bangus,
cacao, goat, cattle, coffee, abaca, mango and mariculture. Based on approved value chain analysis the province priority
commodity are; cardava banana, cacao, abaca, coconut (coco sugar, coco sauce, coir), coffee, cassava, fresh mango,
lanzones, organic rice, pork, cattle, dairy cattle and chevon.
The common marketing practices of agricultural and fisheries products in Misamis Oriental are either through middlemen,
traders or the so-called suki system and direct to the processors, which is either in the form of credit-marketing tie-up or
regular client relationship.

For grains such as corn and palay, the existence of an intricate web of trading hierarchy has been noted. Aside from the
grains procurement services of the NFA, it has been a common practice among buyers to procure grains from millers in
Region 10 who in turn, bought palay and corn from a network of provincial and municipal traders, including some trusted
individual-farmers. Municipal traders even resorted to the extent of settting-up buying stations in the barangays to ensure the
procurement of grains. It is through this trading hierarchy where marketing linkages and information flowed as to the sources
and volume of corn and palay, as well as, its buying price.

A more or less similar trading practices is also observed in the case of vegetables and fruits, where farmers sold their
produce to local buyers/traders who buy in volume, some transport them to Cagayan de Oro City and in turn ship them out to
another group of traders either to Manila or Cebu, while, other will be sold out to retailers of Cagayan de Oro City. Some
Vegetable Gower’s Association sold their product directly to big trader’s acts as distributors of big Supermarket and Hotels
in Cagayan de Oro City.

Other forms of marketing practices are the contract - growing schemes undertaken by SWIFT, MAGNOLIA and Anak Tering
Foundation in the case of broiler production and marketing tie-up of papaya and pineapple growers with the Del Monte
Philippines Inc. (DMPI), San Migule Corporation (SMC) for cassava growers, Nestle Phillipines for Coffee and KFI for cacao.

Prominent processing industries in the province include the United Robina Corporation in the city of El Salvador for corn by-
products, NMFDC producers of dairy products also found in El Salvadorthe, DMPI in Bugo, Cagayan de Oro City for
pineapple and papaya and AMLEY Philippines at Villanueva for mango by-products. Coconut buyer is the Legaspi Oil at
Tablon, Cagayan de Oro City and INDOPIL in Medina. Grains and cassava processor/buyer in Cagayan de Oro City are
Limketkai Manufacturing Corp., LP Bombeo, D & D Trading, ADV Agro Tradelink Corp., DBA Traders, Eden Huang Trading,
Silver General Merchandiser and Cagayan Corn Products.

Home industries that was already developed and sold out in the bigger market are Cashew/Dragon Fruit wine of Sinai RIC of
Laguindingan. Promising export potential products is coco sugar which was produced by Agay-ayan MPC, Linabu Agrarian
MPC. Other existing home industries products that are already available in the market are herbal process products such as
turmeric, which is shown in Table 9.

Table 1.2.15 Different Products Produced in Misamis Oriental already in the Market

Products Processor/Location Chairman/Owner/Manager Remarks

Oolong Tea Bloming Forest MPC Marcial Dotorat - Chairman Tea
Kalagonoy, Gingoog City 09263362638
Coffee Sioan Gintong Araw Agriculture Mc Robert Baguiz - Chairman Corn Coffee
Cooperative 09750390106
Sioan, Gingoog City
Jed Saye Jed Coffee - Corn Coffee
Poblacion, Libertad with malungagy & Lemon
Grass
Rorich Baguio Kape Lumad
Gingoog City
Poultry Products Canitoan, Cagayan de Oro City Mr. Alberto Ysalina - Fresh duck eggs & salted
Pagatpat, Cagayan de eggs
Oro City
Gumaod, Claveria Mis. Or. Mr. Julious Isdicol Fresh native egg and
Gumaod, Claveria chicken
Coconut Products Agay-ayan MPC Charlito Labial - Manager Coco Sugar
Agay-ayan, Gingoog City
Linabu Agrarian MPC (LAMPCO) Reyno Molo - Chairman Coco Sugar
Linabu, Balingasag
Tablea Dapanas Farm Arnold Dapana – Owner
Manticao 0916-332-6554

Products Processor/Location Chairman/Owner/Manager Remarks

Dairy Products Northern Mindanao Federation of Mr. Enerio –Manager Fresh Milk, Flavor Milk,
Dairy Cooperative (NMFDC) Zone 8, Pob., El Salvador City Milk Bars, Goda Cheese
Rock Salts Baybay- Rural Women’s Assn. Elvie Desiderio -Chairman
Baybay, Alubijid
 Sinaloc Salt Making Assn. Felix Amelao - Chairman
Sinaloc, El Salvador City
Fruit Wine Sirguilias/Dragon Fruits Wine – Sinai Delia Bacsarsa – owner
RIC, Laguindingan, Mis. Or.
Dragon Fruit Wine-Syri Farm Elmer Syri –Owner
Poblacion, Initao
Herbal Process Products Mylin Herbal Products Mylin Venador Tayapad - Owner Turmeric
Lagonglong
Dra. Celeste Quirijro Garden Dra. Celeste Quirijro Garden -
Patag, Opol Owner
Process Bangus Balingasag Producers Coop Jocelyn B. Merencillo - Chairman Bangus n Bottle & debone
Waterfall, Balingasag
Guinamos Gimaylan Women’s Anecita M. Quitoriano -Chairman
Poblacion, Libertad
Titing’s Guinamos Zosimo Santos - Owner
Gimaylan, Libertad
Sinamay Lagonglong Waivers Assn. Mrs. Emerna Gabutina - Manager
Poblacion, Lagonglong
Producers: RIC – Lugait Delia Chavez –Manager
Bibingka Poblacion, Lugait
Source: MIS - PAGRO

Coconut-based products asserted its dominance in the regions’ export market. Processed Foods consisting of canned
pineapple products, banana chips, and powdered milk came next followed with industrial manufacturing products. Other
goods that included fresh fruits also contributed shared regions export market.

Despite Misamis Oriental’s industrial advantage over other provinces, still the agricultural sector, in various degrees, feed
such industries; thus, the importance of continuing investments and technical support to agriculture and agri-and agro-
based industries. Not only the industries, but new market opportunities are on the horizon, as new infrastructure improve
viability and bring to the fore potential commodities and products for promotion and expansion.

The establishment of support infrastructure that promotes external access and internal integration greatly contributes to
improving and expanding services in all areas, as well as in promoting resiliency in the agriculture and fishery industry
sector.

1.3 Socio Economic and Demographic Profile

1.3.1 Population

 Population of Misamis Oriental

The total population of Misamis Oriental is 1,685,302 (including Cagayan de Oro City), with an average annual growth rate
of 1.6% based on the census conducted by NSO in 2020. Population of the province excluding Cagayan de Oro City is
956,900. Urban City and municipality has higher population. Cagayan de Oro City comprises 43.22%, Congressional District
2 has 32.7% higher than Congressional District 1 with only 24.08%, because municipalities in District 2 are near the 3 Cities
namely, Cagayan de Oro City, El Salvador City and Iligan City and an agri-industrial area. Out of the total population of the
province 85 % or 813,365 from the total population of District 1 and District 2 are farmers and fishefolks.

Table 1.3.1 Misamis Oriental Total Populations 2020 by Municipality/ City

Misamis Oriental Population -1,685,302 including Cagayan de Oro City

Congressional District 1 Congressional District 2
Municipality Population Municipality Population
Magsaysay 36,803 Jasaan 57,055
Gingoog City 136,698 Villanueva 40,419
Medina 35,612 Claveria 52,478
Talisayan 25,761 Tagoloan 80,319
Balingoan 11,020 Opol 66,327
Kinoguitan 14,091 El Salvador City 58,771
Sugbongcogon 9,764 Alubijid 32,163
Binuangan 7,441 Laguindingan 26,363
Salay 29,998 Gitagum 17,920
Lagonglong 24,190 Libertad 12,948
Balingasag 74,385 Initao 33,902
Total PopulationDistrict 1 – 405,763 Naawan 22,444
District 3 Manticao 29,469
Cagayan de Oro City 728,402 Lugait 20,559
Total Population District 2 551,137
Source: PSA-Census 2020

Figure 1.3.1 Population Map of Misamis Oriental 2020

 Population Disaggregated by Farming and Non-Farming

Table 1.3.2 Population, No. of Household, No. of Farming Household, No. of Fisherfolks
& Non-Farming Household of Misamis Oriental

MUNICIPALITY/ POPULATION NO. OF NO. OF NO OF NO. OF NON-

CITY HOUSEHOLD FARMING FISHERFOLKS FARMING
HOUSEHOLD HOUSEHOLD
District 1
Magsaysay 36,803 7,360 6,577 12 771
Gingoog City 136,698 27,340 19,767 180 7,393
Medina 35,612 7,122 4,687 114 2,321
Talisayan 25,761 5,152 4,297 99 756
Balingoan 11,020 2,204 1,816 19 369
Kinoguitan 14,091 2,818 2,778 10 30
Sugbongcogon 9,764 1,952 1,241 17 694
Binuangan 7,441 1,488 1,136 105 247
Salay 29,998 5,999 3,993 23 1,983
Lagonglong 24,190 4,838 3,683 22 1,133
Balingasag 74,385 14,877 13,445 33 1,399
District 2
 Jasaan 57,055 11,411 6,655 89 4,667
Villanueva 40,419 8,083 3,217 81 4,785
Claveria 52,478 15,495 12,545 2,950
Tagoloan 80,319 16,063 5,934 25 10,104
Opol 66,327 13,265 5,089 172 8,004
El Salvador City 58,771 11,754 11,469 51 234
Alubijid 32,163 10,432 9,127 44 1,261
Laguindingan 26,363 5,272 4,684 24 564
Gitagum 17,920 4,584 4,156 74 354
Libertad 12,948 3,589 2,368 251 970
Initao 33,902 6,780 4,942 144 1,694
Naawan 22,444 4,488 4,123 38 327
Manticao 29,469 5,893 4,862 243 788
Lugait 20,559 4,711 4,272 23 416
District 3
Cagayan de Oro 728,402 145,680 65,556 1,456 78,668
City
Misamis Oriental
1,685,302 348,650 212,419 3,349 132,882

2 Labor Force

 Employment/ Unemployment

The region’s labor force reached 2.3 million persons in 2021 with a 66.7 percent labor force participation rate. The
employment rate for said period was at 94.6 percent. Meanwhile, the full-year underemployment rate decreased from
23.6 percent in 2020 to 18.3 percent in 2021, signaling a return to pre-pandemic levels.

Total employed persons in 2021 reached 2,176 million, an increase of 3.8percent from the previous year based on the
preliminary results of the annual Labor Force Survey. The labor force participation rate of 66.7 percent was also the
highest among regions in the country. The increase in total employment the increase in labor force (2.7 percent) which
resulted in the increased in the region’s employment rate by 3.9 percentage point.

More quality jobs were created as evidenced by the decreased in the number of underemployed persons by -19.8
percent. While underemployment rate decreased by one percentage point 5.4 %.

Table 1.3.3 Labor Force and Employment Status, Region X from 2020- 2021

INDICATOR 2020 2021* % Change

Household Population 15 Years and Over ('000) 3,372 3,450 2.3
Labor Force ('000) 2,237 2,300 2.8
Labor Force Participation Rate 66.3 33.7 0.3**
Employed Persons ('000) 2,094 2.176 3.9
Employment Rate 93.6 94.6 1.0**
Underemployed Persons ('000) 495 397 -19.8
Underemployment Rate 23.6 18.3 -5.4**
Unemployment Person ('000) 143 124 -13.2
Unemployment Rate 6.4 5.4 -1.0**
Source: PSA-X

In 2021 Bukidnon has the highest available labor force with 808,000 in the region followed by Misamis Oriental 477,000
and the lowest was Camiguin with 42,000. In terms of labor force participation rate highest was Bukinon 78.3% followed
by Misamis Oriental 71.3 % and the lowest was Iligan City 57.3%. Lanao del Norte has the highest employment rate of
97.6% then Bukidnon 96.5% while Misamis Oriental third 95.5% and the lowest was Cagayan de Oro City. For
underemployed person the highest was in Bukidnon of 23.2% then Camiguin 21.3%, Misamis Oriental 9.3% and the
lowest was Iligan City 5%. Unemployed person highest was in Cagayan de Oro City with 9.3% the lowest was in Lanao
del Norte 2.4% while, Misamis Oriental was the 5th in the region of 4.5%.
 Table 1.3.4 Labor Force and Employment Status, by Province and HUC in 2021

INDICATOR BUKIDNON CAMIGUIN LANAO ILIGAN MISAMIS MISAMIS CAGAYAN

DEL OCCIDENTAL ORIENTAL DE ORO
NORTE CITY
Labor Force (‘000) 808 42 313 137 307 477 326
Labor Force 78.3 67.4 63.4 57.3 70.4 71.3 62.8
Participation Rate (%)
Employed Persons 779 39 305 127 290 456 295
(‘000)
Employment Rate (%) 96.5 92.0 97.6 92.4 94.5 95.5 90.7
Underemployed 181 8 21 6 35 42 34
Persons (‘000)
Underemployment Rate 23.2 21.3 6.9 5.0 11.9 9.3 11.4
(%)
Unemployed Persons 29 3 7 10 17 22 30
(‘000)
Unemployment Rate 3.5 8.0 2.4 7.6 5.5 4.5 9.3
(%)

 Labor Force in Agriculture Sector

Table No. 1.3.5 Labor Force in Agriculture Sector of Misamis Oriental

Congressional District 1 Congressional District 2
Municipality Agriculture Labor Force Municipality Agriculture Labor Force
Magsaysay 6,577 Jasaan 6,655
Gingoog City 19,767 Villanueva 3,217
Medina 4,687 Claveria 12,545
Talisayan 4,297 Tagoloan 5,934
Balingoan 1,816 Opol 5,089
Kinoguitan 2,778 El Salvador City 11,469
Sugbongcogon 1,241 Alubijid 9,127
Binuangan 1,136 Laguindingan 4,684
Salay 3,993 Gitagum 4,156
Lagonglong 3,683 Libertad 2,368
Balingasag 13,445 Initao 4,942
Total Population District 1 – 63,420 Naawan 4,123
District 3 Manticao 4,862
Cagayan de Oro City 65,556 Lugait 4,272
Total Population
Misamis Oriental 212,419 District 2 83,443

3 Poverty Threshold

The annual per capita poverty threshold (the annual income required for a person to be non-poor) of Misamis Oriental for 2021
is PhP 28,270 ,14.69 per cent higher than the PhP 24,118 in 2018. This converts to an annual family poverty threshold of PhP
141,348 for a family of five (5), or a monthly family poverty threshold of PhP11,779.

The poverty incidence among families of the province increased by 1.6 % from 11.4% in 2018 to 13.0% in 2021. This converts
to 4,152 increased in the number of poor families in the province. In terms of magnitude, the number of poor families in the
province has reached 55,150 which comprised 24.17 % of the region’s poor families.

TABLE NO. 1.3.6 SUBSISTENCE INCIDENCE AND MAGNITUDE OF SUBSISTENCE POOR FAMILIES, PHILIPPINES,
REGION X, PROVINCE: 2018 AND 2021

Annual per Capita Poverty Incidence Among Magnitude of Poor

Poverty Threshold Families Families (in thousands)
 LOCATION / AREA (In Pesos)
2018 2021 2018 2021 2018 2021
Philippines 25,813 28,871 12.1 13.2 3,004.61 3,496.46
Region X 24,835 28,836 17.3 19.2 194.22 228.18
Bukidnon 25,624 29,040 22.3 22.8 73.42 79.93
Camiguin 26,042 28,514 17.9 14.7 3.81 3.28
Lanao del Norte 24,450 28,589 19.0 25.5 44.26 63.32
Misamis Occ. 24,505 30,062 19.5 18.3 27.30 26.49
Misamis Or. 24,118 28,270 11.4 13.0 45.42 55.15
Source: PSA X

A person in the province would require PhP 19,650.00 annually, in 2021 to meet his most basic food requirement (annual per
capita food/subsistence threshold). For a family of 5, this converts to an annual family food threshold of PhP 98,256, or a
monthly requirement of PhP 8,188 for food alone (Table 6.48). In 2021, the number of food-poor families increased by 4,152
to a total subsistence magnitude of 11,450 families.

TABLE NO. 1.3.7: SUBSISTENCE INCIDENCE AND MAGNITUDE OF SUBSISTENCE POOR FAMILIES, PHILIPPINES,
REGION X, PROVINCE: 2018 AND 2021

Annual per Capita Poverty Threshold Poverty Incidence Among Magnitude of Poor Families
LOCATION / AREA (In Pesos) Families (in thousands)
2018 2021 2018 2021 2018 2021
Philippines 18,128 20,111 3.4 3.9 839.54 3,496.46
Region X 17,370 20,124 3.9 6.2 43.29 73.60
Bukidnon 17,874 20,359 5.6 8.3 18.42 29.00
Camiguin 18,151 19,981 3.8 3.8 0.80 0.86
Lanao del Norte 17,062 19,916 3.9 9.7 6.27 21.53
Misamis Occ. 17,092 21,046 4.2 4.0 5.91 5.79
Misamis Or. 16,835 19,650 2.3 3.2 7.14 11.45
Source: PSA X

TABLE NO. 1.3.8: MONTHLY POVERTY AND FOOD THRESHOLD (FOR A FAMILY OF FIVE), PHILIPPINE, REGION X,
PROVINCE: 2018 AND 2021

Poverty Threshold (Monthly/for a Food Threshold (Monthly/for a

LOCATION/ AREA family of 5) family of 5)
2018 2021 2018 2021
Philippines 10,727 12,030 7,553 8,380
Region X 10,348 12,015 7,238 8,385
Bukidnon 10,678 12,100 7,448 8,483
Camiguin 10,851 11,881 7,563 8,325
Lanao del Norte 10,188 11,912 7,109 8,298
Misamis Occ. 10,210 12,526 7,122 8,769
Misamis Or. 8,799 11,779 7,015 8,188
Source: PSA X

Based on the 2021 data, poverty incidence among population in Misamis Oriental is lower by 0 .6 percentage points compared
to our country and lower by 7.4 percentage points as compared to the region. Among the 5 provinces of Region X, we have the
lowest poverty incidence of 18.7%, with Camiguin having the second lowest Magnitude of subsistence among population in
Misamis Oriental is lower by 0.07 percentage points compared to our country and lower by 3.0percentage points as compared to
our region.

The province ranked first in terms of low subsistence incidence at 18.7%, with Camiguin having the second lowest at 20.6%
among the provinces of our region with a difference 1.9 percentage points.
 TABLE NO. 1.3.9: POVERTY INCIDENCE AND MAGNITUDE OF POOR POPULATION, REGION X: 2015, 2018 AND 2021

Poverty Incidence Among the Population Magnitude of Subsistence of Poor Population

Region/Province 2015 2018 2021 2015 2018 2021
Philippines 23.15 16.7 18.1 9,215.65 5,540.62 6,545.39
Region X 38.7 23.1 26.1 1,813.05 1,129.18 1,323.07
Bukidnon 54.0 27.6 29.2 733.88 406.26 446.12
Camiguin 36.1 24.3 20.6 38.21 22.07 19.18
Lanao del Norte 45.7 25.8 34.3 427.21 275.18 380.71
Misamis Occ. 45.1 26.8 24.7 239.96 165.55 155.90
Misamis Or. 21.4 15.8 18.7 373.79 260.12 321.15
Source: PSA X

4 Poverty Incidence

The lack of employment opportunities, high population growth and inequality of incomes are some of the reasons of poverty.

Among the twenty-three municipalities of the province in 2018, Magsaysay has the highest rate of poverty incidence followed by
Claveria, Balingasag, Talisayan and Lagonglong. Those with low poverty incidence are the municipalities of Opol having the
lowest, followed by Tagoloan, Villanueva, Lugait and Medina.

TABLE NO. 1.3.10: POVERTY INCIDENCE AND RANKING BY MUNICIPALITY/ CITY

MISAMIS ORIENTAL:2028

MUNICIPALITY/CITY POVERTY INCIDENCE RANK

Magsaysay 25.8 1
Gingoog City 22.7 2
Claveria 22.1 3
Balingasag 20.1 4
Talisayan 19.9 5
Lagonglong 18.9 6
Balingoan 18.5 7
Medina 18.2 8
Sugbongcogon 17.9 9
Libertad 17.9 10
Manticao 17.7 11
Salay 17.3 12
Binuangan 17.1 13
Kinoguitan 17.1 14
Initao 17.0 15
Tagoloan 16.8 16
Naawan 16.7 17
Jasaan 16.7 18
Villanueva 16.0 19
Gitagum 15.8 20
Laguindingan 15.2 21
Alubijid 14.9 22
Lugait 14.1 23
El Salvador City 13.3 24
Opol 12.7 25
SOURCE: 2009 Small Area Estimates, NSCB

5 House Hold Income

6 House Hold Income in Regin X

The Northern Mindanao Region registered a total of PHP 280,508 million annual family incomes. The annual average in
thousands is at PHP 250,000. Meanwhile, the region’s annual expenditure is PHP 195,666 million, with the average annual
family expenditure at PHP 175 thousand.
 TABLE NO. 1.3.11 NUMBER OF FAMILIES, TOTAL AND AVERAGE ANNUAL FAMILY INCOME AND
EXPENDITURE, REGION X, 2018

PARTICULAR REGION X
(NORTHERN MINDANAO)
Number of Families (in thousands) 1,120
Total (in millions) 280,508
INCOME Average (in thousand) 250
Total (in millions) 195,666
EXPENDITURE Average (in thousand) 175
Source: PSA-X

6.2 Climate and Weather

Globally, substantial evidence shows the extreme changes in temperature, increase of intense cyclone activity and changes in
rainfall patterns. Based on the study of climate change in the Philippines, there will be an increasing temperature, an average
of 20 tropical cyclone however no indication of increase in frequency and changes in extreme rain events in certain areas of
the country.

Philippine climate system is inherent to the natural hazards such as droughts, floods, strong winds and storm surges. An
extreme climatic event such as the El Niño Phenomenon is seasonal and inter-annual climate variability in the Philippines. It is
a large-scale natural fluctuation of the global climate system caused by the interactions between the ocean and the
atmosphere in the Central and Eastern Equatorial Pacific (CEEP). El Niño is the oceanic component which produces a
marked warming of the waters in the CEEP. Another phase of natural hazards is called La Niña which is described as merely
an extreme phase of normal condition and tends to have fewer and adverse impacts worldwide.

Misamis Oriental has a tropical climate dominated by a rainy season and a dry season. There are two types of Climate in
Misamis Oriental based on the Modified Coronas Classification:

Type III – No very pronounced maximum rain period, with a short dry season lasting only from one to three months although it
has a short dry season. Type III occurs in the towns of Kinoguitan to Magsaysay. Areas of this climate type are partly shielded
from the northwest monsoon but are exposed to the southwest monsoon and are also benefited by the rainfall caused by the
tropical cyclones.

Type IV – Rainfall is more or less evenly distributed throughout the year and it has no dry season. This climate occurs in the
central and western part of the province from Sugbongcogon to Lugait.

From 2011 to 2021, the month of January 2014 registered the heaviest rainfall with 504.6 mm. It is also noted that CY 2017 is
the rainiest year with an annual rainfall of 2,331.9 mm.

In 2011, Misamis Oriental was hit by Tropical Storm (TS) Sendong (International name: Washi) which was the second tropical
storm that affected Mindanao in 2011 and the 19th tropical cyclone that entered the Philippine Area of Responsibility (PAR) in
the same year. The Lumbia PAGASA Station recorded a one-day rainfall of 180.9 mm which is higher than the monthly
average of 117 mm during December in the period 1977 - 2005. Cagayan de Oro City was hardly hit by typhoon Sendong.

TABLE NO. 1.4.1: MONTHLY RAINFALL (MM), MISAMIS ORIENTAL, FROM 2011 TO 2021

MONTHS
YEARS Jan Feb March April May June July August Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2011 181.3 166.3 130.7 34.9 118.3 231.6 182.5 226.8 232.3 209.1 115.6 333.6
2012 24.2 122.9 67.4 74.2 152.7 144.9 273.7 174.6 200.3 185.2 42.3 207.0
2013 211.1 93.3 61.2 89.3 201.1 310.2 279.7 211.4 162.0 186.5 103.5 13.7
2014 504.6 39.9 83.6 158.5 37.2 195.8 310.3 409.9 232.7 76.7 94.2 137.1
2015 176.6 6.8 3.4 66.4 40.4 179.8 111.9 47.2 192.3 112.7 37.9 81.3
2016 4.5 2.7 0.0 0.0 114.3 337.8 112.9 175.8 236.7 184.4 110.0 170.3
2017 309.4 121.4 136.9 88.5 149.3 240.7 183.7 278.4 359.5 231.0 83.7 149.4
2018 73.9 116.9 40.7 14.7 104.9 268.5 97.0 97.3 258.4 59.1 46.0 41.4
2019 98.4 0.8 10.1 10.6 64.6 133.8 196.8 74.7 65.8 75.0 96.7 17.1
2020 5.5 7.5 57.5 3.2 84.1 200.2 230.5 255.3 76.5 312.9 53.6 170.6
2021 198.8 73.3 53.8 18.8 233.8 188.2 264.1 130.7 165.3 285.0 75.7 336.2
SOURCE: PAGASA
CHAPTER II DEVELOPMENT VISION, MISSION AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTION

2.1 OVER ALL VISION MISSION AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTION

VISION

“Anchored on participatory and consultative governance, Misamis Oriental is home to empowered, healthy, and resilient
Misamisnons harmoniously coexisting in a safe and secure environment. Aiming to develop a globally competitive economy
by sustainably mobilizing its large agri-industrial base, and tourism and trade potentials.”

MISSION

“To continually improve and uplift the quality of life of the people of Misamis Oriental through sustainable development
towards economic, environmental, and social progress.”

GENERAL GOALS AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTION

Environmental Protection and Management

On the concern of Environmental Protection and Management, the Provincial Government aims to:

 To effectively manage the environmental resources of the Province of Misamis Oriental and promote environmental
sustainability and enhanced biodiversity.

Social Equity and Inclusion

On the concern of inequality among Misamisnon, the Provincial Government ensures everyone in the
community has access to the same opportunities and outcomes such as,

 To improve the quality of life in Misamis Oriental by addressing the incidence and causes of poverty.
 To provide support to the municipalities and barangays by maximizing resources (workforce, programs, facilities and
financial assets) in view of providing the greatest possible benefit for the people of Misamis Oriental.
 To ensure continued peace and order in the Province of Misamis Oriental.
 To develop Misamis Oriental as a disaster ready and disaster-resilient province.
 LIVELIHOOD AND EMPLOYMENT THROUGH INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT. The development of sustainable
livelihoods and stable employment is critical to providing a predictable flow of income to families. The creation of
sustainable, viable and diversified livelihood and employment opportunities will revitalize and develop the local
economy of the province thereby reducing the index of poverty. Developing the existing industry and introducing new
ones that are innovative and competitive will support the policy of promoting livelihood and employment.

 AGGRESSIVE PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT

It is recognized that the youth play a vital role in nation building hence it is the policy of the state to promote and
protect the physical, moral, spiritual, intellectual and social well-being to the end that the youth realize their potential
for improving the quality of life. It is a supported notion that the state is mandated to support the parents in the
exercise of their rights and duties in rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and the development of moral character.
To this end, the PGMO endeavors to provide at least one (1) scholar per less privileged family.

 UNIFIED EFFORTS FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES DELIVERY.

The PGMO aims to create programs and initiatives to improve health care access and enhance the quality of health
services.
PROVINCIAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTION

The Misamis Oriental’s the New Administration’s Strategic Development Direction, the PAGLAUM.

PARTICIPATORY GOVERNANCE

The administration envisions a participatory and consultative form of government. The design and implementation of public
policies and plans must respond effectively to citizen’s priorities and needs. This denotes participations of non-governmental
actors to make decisions about matters that directly concern them hence, the end-users of the government projects must be
involved in the planning stage.

 Improvement of Social and Health services through participation of all sectors in achieving the health Sustainable
Development Goal (SDG) in a Public-Private Partnership which includes the Provincial Government down to the
Barangay Level as well as professionalization of its workforce. This also involves the services of the health workers
and its devolution by creation of plantilla positions for the said health workers, formulation of hiring guidelines and the
review of the existing manuals in view of management of emerging diseases. This will be achieved by also strictly
implementing the guidelines set by the SP Ordinance.

 Effective Environmental Management and Protection and compliance to environmental laws, rules, and regulations
such as the Ecological Solid Waste Management Act, the Clean Air Act, Water Code of the Philippines, and others,
need the active participation of all stakeholders. The active participation of various stakeholders will promote the
sustainable utilization of mineral resources thus achieving a balanced and healthful ecology. The Provincial
Government of Misamis Oriental plans to continue and undertake activities geared towards environmental protection.
Implementation of the ridge to reef protection from watershed areas to marine protected areas, is one of the activities
eyed for implementation by the Provincial Government. The devolved functions from national agencies will also be
essential in the attainment of a safe and secure environment.

 The involvement of stakeholders in tourism development promotes multi-stakeholder partnership. Multi-stakeholder

partnership can be realized through conducting meetings, forums and consultation activities with people’s councils,
private sectors and CSOs.

AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT FOR POVERTY ERADICATION

The Philippines is primarily an agricultural country. Filipinos mainly engage in various forms of agricultural activities
ranging from farming, fisheries, livestock, and forestry. The Province of Misamis Oriental having a diverse landscape and
its people engaging in varying forms of agricultural activities, the administration aims to eradicate poverty by capacitating
the constituents of the Province of Misamis Oriental through Agricultural Development.

 Increasing the income of livestock and poultry farmers by preventing the entry and limiting the spread of Transboundary
Animal Diseases is vital to poverty eradication. Introduction of new technologies and mechanization will enhance
productivity and ensure efficient operation.

 This goal will be attainable through the implementation of the devolved functions and programs thus, uplifting the life of
farmers who are below the poverty line. Additional technical personnel and the introduction of new technologies and
mechanization in agriculture can enhance their productivity and efficient operations.

 Improvement of the yield of farmers of crops would require the application and extension of existing agricultural
technologies, adoption of technological and policy measures to improve sustainability of agriculture and increased
production for ensuring food sufficiency. The Food Always In The Home (FAITH) and PAGLAUM sa UMA programs and
other programs, projects, and activities (PPAs) for the agricultural sector are some of the many programs of the
Provincial Government of Misamis Oriental for the agricultural sector.
 GOAL-ORIENTED TOURISM DEVELOPMENT

The tourism industry contributes to the three high-priority goals of developing countries: the generation of income,
employment, and foreign-exchange earnings. It plays an important role as a driving force of economic development. For
years, the tourism industry of the Province of Misamis Oriental thrives to greater heights. The administration acknowledges
the importance of tourism to economic development and plans to improve and enhance the existing tourism sites as well
as develop and discover potential tourism areas. The Provincial Government will put up an economic enterprise that is self-
regulating and self-generating in areas having high potential for tourism industry.

 Intensifying eco-tourism infrastructure, developing core tourism road network, capacitating and mobilizing human
resource and organization to enhance and develop tourism activities. The establishment and strengthening of each
LGUs tourism industry will boost economic activity in the Province of Misamis Oriental. The creation and coordination of
tourism councils and organizations will sustain tourism and economic activities in the Province of Misamis Oriental.

LIVELIHOOD AND EMPLOYMENT THROUGH INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT

The development of sustainable livelihoods and stable employment is critical to providing a predictable flow of income to
families. The creation of sustainable, viable and diversified livelihood and employment opportunities will revitalize and develop
the local economy of the province thereby reducing the index of poverty. Developing the existing industry and introducing new
ones that are innovative and competitive will support the policy of promoting livelihood and employment.

 The opportunity to provide capital and technical capacity to the farmers and MSMEs can improve the economic activity
of the province and its potential growth. Through agriculture, tourism, and social PPAs, it can provide technical
assistance, trainings, and alternative sources of income. To uplift the life of the Misamisnons is to provide livelihood. This
may also be achieved by being an investor’s friendly institution as it is envisioned to be a globally competitive economy
that sustainably mobilizes its large agri-industrial base and tourism and trade potentials.

AGGRESSIVE PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT

It is recognized that the youth plays a vital role in nation building hence it is the policy of the state to promote and protect the
physical, moral, spiritual, intellectual and social well-being to the end that the youth realize their potential for improving the
quality of life. It is a supported notion that the state is mandated to support the parents in the exercise of their rights and duties
in rearing of the youth for civic efficiency and the development of moral character. To this end, the PGMO endeavors to
provide at least one (1) scholar per less privileged family.

 Healthy, well-nourished and well developed cognitive and physical development milestone of all 0-6-year-old children will
ensure zero malnutrition case for pre-school children by conducting master listing in every barangay and monitoring and
assessment of these children. Also, improvement and upgrading of Barangay Child Development Center with provision of
basic learning materials will ensure that every barangay will be able to have a Child Development Center. It will also be
essential to provide health services especially during the first 1,000 days of the child.

UNIFIED EFFORTS FOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES DELIVERY

The PGMO aims to create programs and initiatives to improve health care access and enhance the quality of health services.
With the unified efforts of all stakeholders, the administration targets to improve and expand the availability of health and
social services, and expand access to underserved and rural areas. The Provincial Government aims to empower and
encourage the participation of the Municipal/City Local Government Units of the Province in the delivery of health and social
services programs.

 The delivery of prompt, readily available, accessible, quality, effective and efficient health services ensures the vision of
the province for healthy and resilient Misamisnons. This can also be attained by professionalizing the health workforce
and creation of plantillas which will determine the adequacy of manpower level viz needs of population against standards
set by national and global health agencies and the devolved functions.

 Improvement of services and upgrading of level by upgrading the existing facilities and addition of hospitals such as sub-
specialty hospitals (kidney, lung, and heart). The vertical operational integration of other government owned hospitals
into the province-wide health delivery system will be able to achieve the seamless operability of all hospitals in view of
the greater objective of Universal Health Care.
MOBILIZATION OF RESOURCES THRU EQUITABLE SHARING

Local Government Units are classified from first class to sixth class depending on the average annual income. In order to help
raise the classification of the municipalities which are in the lower level of the classification, the revenue raised by the Province
shall be shared equitably among the Municipal/City Local Government Units of the Province of Misamis Oriental in the sense
that more financial access is given to the lower class LGUs.

 Adopt a holistic approach to address the upland and lowland natural resources dealing with environment, protection and
conservation must be managed and control access to ridge to reef approach regardless of political boundaries. The
provincial government must provide technical and financial support to the Cities, Municipalities, and even to the
barangays.

 Infrastructure projects to uplift every Misamisnon especially those in the lowclass municipalities and thereby increase the
economic growth. The farm to market roads will provide a positive impact and be beneficial to the constituents. And the
aim to be a SMART Province.

2.2 AGRICULTURE SECTOR VISION AND GOAL

Misamis Oriental is agri-industrial province since 62% household main incomes depend on agriculture and fishery
enterprise/industry. There are 212,419 household involved in farming enterprise and 3,349 household engage in fishing
enterprise. During the strategic planning of the Provincial Agriculture Sector it was found out, average productivity of the major
commodities below the average and income of farmers was below poverty line.

The factors or elements that contribute with low productivity and income were high cost of inputs, lack of quality seeds and
planting materials, lack of labor services especially during land preparation and harvesting, soil depletion, lack of farm
equipment and machineries, lack of post-harvest facilities, low buying price of agri products, limited access to the market,
inaccessible farm to market road, unpredictable weather condition, land conversion and change of crops from corn to tobacco/
fruits to industrial crops like falcate. For livestock sector are high price of concentrate, lack of quality breeding stock, lack of
processing center, unstable market price and poor nutrition especially for large animals because lack of forage and pasture. In
the fishery sector in marine capture fishing inappropriate/insufficient fishing gear /paraphernalia, lack of post-harvest/
processing facilities, marketing were monopolize by middle men, for seaweeds production are lack of seaweeds propagules,
ice-ice diseases, unpredictable weather condition and lack of drying and processing facilities, for cultured fishing lack of stocks
and lack of knowledge of fisherfolks.

However, Misamis Oriental is self-sufficient in some agricultural crops such as corn, fruits (banana, mango, pineapple, and
papaya), vegetable and poultry. Locally export products are corn, banana, mango, papaya, vegetable, cattle, chicken and
swine, even with the presence of several constraints/gaps. So with the strong support of the present Administration in
agricultural and fishery sector assure us of sufficient food and increase income for all Misamisnon.

Goal

Sustainable integrated agricultural development for poverty eradication.

Objectives

1. Increased farmers and fisherfolks income thru increase productivity, quality and competitiveness in all priority crops,
livestock and fisheries.
2. Increase income of livestock and poultry farmers by preventing the entry and limiting the entrance of transboundary
animal diseases and introduction of new technologies and mechanization to insure productivity and efficient
operation.
3. To provide enough safety nutritious food for Misamisnon thru organic farming and promotion of backyard fish pond
production..
4. Increased market linkage, efficient marketing system thru provision of appropriate marketing facilities.
5. To insure sustainable production thru provision of irrigation facility.
6. Increase knowledge of farmers and fisherfolks of new technologies by hiring additional technical personnel that can
provide technical assistance and thru capability building.
 7. To have efficient and effective agricultural development by providing appropriate post-harvest and machineries.
8. Efficient utilization of commodity surplus thru an introduction of value adding with provision of appropriate value
adding equipment and processing facilities.
9. Regulate conversion of agricultural area into non-agricultural purposes such as subdivision.
10. Promote coastal resource management along coastal area to increase fish production in the province.

Agricultural Sector Strategy

1. Intensify production on crop, livestock and poultry and fish both marine and freshwater fisheries.
2. Improve rural infrastructure and increase farm mechanization rate plus its logistics.
3. Adoption of suitable and appropriate farming technologies and pursue development on focused
priority commodities of the province.
4. Promote development of processed and semi-processed agricultural products
5. Adoption of new technologies to maximize production per unit area.
6. Enhance backward and forward linkages of the existing manufactured products
7. Improve livestock and poultry facilities.
8. Proper implementation on coastal resource management.
9. Promote the development of industrial crops such as coconut, cassava, abaca, coffee, cacao and
tobacco.

Priority Programs and Projects

1. Rice Program
1.1 Production Loan Program
1.2 Rice Capability Building
1.3 Integrated Pest Management program
2. Corn/Cassava Program
2.1 Production Loan Program
2.2 Capability Building
2.3 Integrated Pest Management Program
3. High Value Crop Development Program
3.1 Banana Production
3.2 Coffee and cacao Production
3.3 Abaca Production
3.4 Vegetable Production/FAITH with Drip Irrigation
3.5 Tobacco Production
3.6 Oolong Production and Processing
3.7 Sericulture Production
3.8 Tissue Culture Laboratory
3.9 Organic Agriculture Program
4. Fishery Production Program
4.1 Livelihood Project (Backyard Fish Pond, Payaw)
4.2 Coastal Resource Management
4.3 Regulatory Management
5. Agribusiness Development Program
5.1 Operation of Farmers Market
5.2 Product Development and Improvement/Enterprise Development Program
6. Support to Agri-Engineering Program
6.1 Farm Mechanization Program
6.2 Farm Infrastructure Program
7. Livestock & Poultry Program
7.1 Livestock Production
7.2 Livestock Protection & Regulation
7.3 Livelihood Project for Livestock &Poultry
7.4 Quarantine Project
III. PRIORITY COMMODITY CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

Commodity Value Chain 1: Cocoa Bean

Cacao beans

3.1 Commodity Value Chain 1: Cacao

3.1.1 Commodity Profile

Cacao, Theobroma cacao is a rainforest, understudy tree that requires shade and wind protection. It is grown in all humid
tropical lowland regions around the equator, most notably Central and South America, West Africa and Sri Lanka, Indonesia
and the Philippines. It thrives best in areas where rainfall is between 1,150 to 2,500 mm per year and temperatures between
21 to 30 degrees centigrade.

The tree produces pods that contain about 20 to 60 cocoa beans surrounded by a sweet tasting pulp. When fermented and
processed, the beans produce one of the most desired flavour in the world chocolate. The world cocoa market distinguishes
between two broad categories of cocoa beans: "fine or flavour" cocoa beans, and "bulk" or "ordinary" cocoa beans. Fine or
flavour cocoa beans are produced from Criollo or Trinitario cocoa-tree varieties, while bulk cocoa beans come from Forastero
trees. There are, however, known exceptions to this generalisation. Nacional trees in Ecuador, considered to be Forastero-
type trees, produce fine or flavour cocoa. On the other hand, Cameroon cocoa beans, produced by Trinitario-type trees and
whose cocoa powder has a distinct and sought-after red colour, are classified as bulk cocoa beans. The share of fine or
flavour cocoa in the total world production of cocoa beans is just under 5% per annum. Virtually all major activity over the past
five decades has involved bulk cocoa (ICCO website). Mindanao primarily grows Forastero trees and produces “bulk” beans.

Cocoa is an important crop around the world: a cash crop for growing countries and a key import for processing and
consuming countries. Philippines grows cacao as well as produces and consumes chocolate based products. Cocoa travels
along a global supply chain crossing countries and continents. The complex production process involves numerous parties
including, farmers, buyers, shipping organizations, processors, chocolatiers, and distributers. Overall, it is possible to identify
four major product categories based on different stages of processing, namely:

- Dried cocoa beans (fermented/unfermented);

- Semi-finished cocoa products (cocoa paste/liquor, cocoa butter, cocoa powder);
- Couverture, or industrial chocolate;
- Finished chocolate products.

Cocoa products traded by the Philippines in the international market include the following:

 Cocoa beans, whole/broken, raw/roast

 Cocoa Powder not containing added sugar / other sweetening matter
 Cocoa Paste, not defatted (licor)
 Cocoa Butter, fat/oil
 Chocolate Confectionery
 Chocolate or Cocoa Powder, chocolate blocks
 Cocoa Paste, wholly / partly defatted (Cocoa Cake)
 Sweetened Cocoa Paste

Among the regions in Mindanao, Davao has the widest range of cocoa products and the biggest market outreach. The region
produces and trades dried fermented beans and all its key by-products. The most dominant product traded by the region in
both domestic and export markets is the cacao beans with SOCCKSARGEN farmers contributing to its supply base.
Dominant product currently produced and traded in the domestic region by other regions in Mindanao.

In 2021, around 4.9 million tons of cocoa were produced worldwide. Côte d'Ivoire and Ghana are by far the two largest cocoa
growing countries, accounting for over 60 % of global cocoa production, followed by Ecuador with 7 %. In Asia, Indonesia is
the largest producer country. Ninety percent (90%) of existing cacao farms are small. This ownership profile holds true even
in the global scenario where most cacao farms are also small, ranging from 1-3 hectares.

In the Philippines, most cacao growing areas are located in the Mindanao Island. Davao Region contributes 78% of the
national cacao production having 7,837.45metric tons (MT) planted in 19,979 hectares of land in 2021 while Luzon and
Visayas shares 8% to the country’s cacao production (PSA).

The overall contribution of Mindanao on the national cacao production is 91%. Davao Region is the major contributor of the
production followed by Region 9, Region 10 and Region 12 (Figure 3.1.1). The large production is primarily due to its climatic
conditions, soil characteristics, presence of integrators, and global players. Of the 3% contribution of Northern Mindanao.
 Figure 3.1.1 Share of Cacao Production in Mindanao by Region (Metric
Tons) CY-2021

Misamis Oriental posted an increasing production performance from CY-2018-2022 because area planted and harvested
was expanded due to production support from PLGU of Mis. Or., National Government, Financial Institution, provision of
quality planting materials, technical assistance plus marketing agreement. Area planted increase to 1,274 hectares from 554
hectares, area harvested from 144 hectares to 237.93 hectares. Average production o.64 Mt./Hectare was high than the
average yield of Northern Mindanao because most of the farmers availed of loan from Green Valley Banks tie up with
Kenymer Incorporated who provided the planting materials and provided technical support thru their trained Cacao Doctors.
Misamis Oriental shared 54% of the Northern Mindanao cacao production.

The market demand of cacao is increasing. Among the primary drivers of this increase are: the big cocoa consumption
demand of the United States and Europe, the increasing discretionary household income in developing countries, and the
positioning of cocoa as health food, among others. While demand is on an uptrend, supply gap continues to widen due to
production constraints brought about by factors such as changing weather condition, pests and diseases, low productivity,
aging trees, possible genetic deterioration on commonly used varieties, competing crops and unsustainable cacao farms.
There is a looming global cacao bean shortage by 2030.

The Philippines’ annual local consumption of cocoa is at 50,000 metric tons while the local supply is around 10,000 metric
tons. The local supply cannot meet the demand of local market thus the Philippines import cocoa products. Given the
scenario of cocoa in the Philippines, it is evident that the expansion and strengthening of the production aspect of the
industry be given emphasis. Further, the cacao industry in Misamis Oriental has to address lack of good agricultural
practices, limited of high-yielding planting materials and product standardization among growers and buyers that will hasten
the increase in yield and production Volume.

Production performance of cacao from 2018 to 2022, in the Philippines area planted/harvested was increasing. In Northern
Mindanao area planted/harvested is slightly increasing from 2018 to 2022. While for Misamis Oriental no changes from 2018
to 2021 and increase in 2022 because of the support from the government provision of technical assistance and quality
planting materials.

Table 3.1.1 Area Planted/Harvested for Cacao: 2018-2022 (in hectares)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

National 18,264.44 27,133.11 30,256.82 31,298.51 31,500.85
Northern
Mindanao 1,051.00 1,314.00 1,324.00 1,324.01 1,327.26
Misamis
Oriental 700 700 700 700 1,100
Source: PSA

In the country volume of production of cacao is increasing from 2018 to 2022 because area planted/
harvested increase plus provision of technical assistance and provision of other support services. In
Northern Mindanao, from 2018 to 2022 was increasing. For Misamis Oriental volume of production is also
increasing.

Table 3.1.2. Volume of Production for Cacao: 2018-2022 (in metric tons)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

National 7,009.10 7,983.20 8,488.60 9,340.74 10,000.07
Northern 194.40 212.60 247.21 283.41 286.45
Mindanao
Misamis 13.20 18.25 21.23 24.46 40.80
Oriental

Average yield performance per hectare, in the Philippines and Northern Mindanao has the same pattern it
slightly decreasing from 2018 to 2020 then it increases from 2021 to 2022. While Misamis Oriental was
increasing.

Table 3.1.3. Average Yield of Cacao: 2018-2022 (MT/HA)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

National 0.38 0.29 0.28 0.30 0.32
Northern 0.18 0.16 0.19 0.21 0.22
Mindanao
Misamis 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.04 0.04
Oriental
Source: PSA

At present area planted of cacao in the province is 1,274 hectares from 131.35 hectares last CY2014,
involving 1,274 farmers. Area already bearing or harvested was 1,100 hectares. The top producing cacao
municipality was Gingoog City followed by Naawan this was because most of the farmers able to availed
loan and able to secured marketing agreement with Kenymer Inc. There will be an expansion area of 3,526
hectares until 2026. This expansion area was back up by Governor Unabia’s agenda to prioritize cacao and
to produce signature chocolate product of Misamis oriental.

Table 3.1.4 Existing/ Expansion Area of Cacao with Production (Mt.) by Municipality / City CY-2022
in Misamis Oriental

Municipality Population Poverty Existing Expansion

Incidence Area Planted No. of Area Harvested Production Area
(Has) farmers (Ha) (Mt.) (Ha.)
Magsaysay 36,803 25.8 5 5 5 0.2 100
Gingoog City 136,698 22.7 350 350 350 14 550
Medina 35,612 18.2 35 35 15 0.6 152
Talisayan 25,761 19.9 91 91 91 3.64 125
Balingoan 11,020 18.5 19 19 19 0.76 171
Kinoguitan 14,091 17.1 135 135 135 4 50
Sugbongcogon 9,764 17.9 20 20 20 0.8
Binuangan 7,441 17.1 5 5 5 0.2 15
Salay 29,998 17.3 15 15 5 0.2 145
Lagonglong 24,190 18.9 20 20 20 0.8 115
Municipality Population Poverty Existing Expansion
Incidence Area Planted No. of Area Harvested Production Area
(Has) farmers (Ha) (Mt.)
Balingasag 74,385 20.1 50 50 40 1.6 250
Jasaan 57,055 16.7 50 50 40 1.6 282
Villanueva 40,419 16.0 4 4 4 0.16 190
Claveria 52,478 22.1 40 40 40 1.8 350
 Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 5 5 5 0.2 15
Opol 66,327 12.7 50 50 50 2
El Salvador 58,771 13.3 0
Alubijid 32,163 14.9 10 10 10 0.4 130
Laguindingan 26,363 15.2 0
Gitagum 17,920 15.8 1 1 1 0.04
Libertad 12,948 17.9 0
Initao 33,902 17.0 0 150
Naawan 22,444 16.7 300 300 200 6 534
Manticao 29,469 17.7 49 49 25 1 115
Lugait 20,559 14.1 20 20 20 0.8 87
Misamis Oriental 957,900 21.4 1,274 1,274 1,100 40.80 3,526

Figure 3.1.2 COMMODITY MAP OF CACAO IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL

3.1.2 Expanded Vulnerability and Sustainability Assessment of Cacao in Misamis Oriental

Expanded Vulnerability and Sustainability Assessment (EVSA) of cacao computation was based on the following parameters
Soil suitability/ VSA Value 50%, Production 10%, No. of Farmers 10%, Area Planted 10%, Poverty Incidence 15% and
Population 5%. It determines crop/commodity suitability to propagation and its value chain development. The threshold of an
acceptable composite index is at 0.4000. It means that areas with index 0.4000 will be given high priority as it has most
suitability for the commodity production.

Table 3.1.2.1 recorded the generated result of EVSA computation of Cacao by cities/ municipalities of the province and Figure
3.1.2 shows the EVSA Map of cacao in Misamis Oriental. Hence, if the acceptable composite index is 0.4000 almost all
municipality/ city of the province is more than 0.4000 Gingoog City, Naawan, Balingasag, Laguindingan Talisayan.
Table 3.1.2.1 EVSA Computation Results of Cacao in Misamis Oriental
Poverty Area Farmers Volume Old Old New New Geo Code
Municipality Population Incidence Planted Involved Prodn. Composite Rank Composite Rank
Index
10430800
GINGOOG CITY 136,698 22.7
900 350 14 0.4659 25 0.71493 1 0
10432000
NAAWAN 22,444 16.7
734 200 6 0.603 10 0.58836 2 0
10430200
BALINGASAG 74,385 20.1
190 40 1.6 0.5924 12 0.48424 3 0
10431400
LAGUINDINGAN 26,363 15.2
0 0 0 0.76 1 0.47801 4 0
10432500
TALISAYAN 25,761 19.9
216 91 3.64 0.5475 19 0.47487 5 0
10431200
KINOGUITAN 14,091 17.1
185 135 4 0.556 17 0.47027 6 0
10432600
VILLANUEVA 40,419 16
194 4 0.16 0.6731 5 0.46819 7 0
10431000
INITAO 33,902 17
150 0 0 0.6763 4 0.46606 8 0
10431700
MAGSAYSAY 36,803 25.8
105 5 0.2 0.5736 15 0.46479 9 0
10431100
JASAAN 57,055 16.7
322 40 1.6 0.5763 14 0.46475 10 0
10432400
TAGOLOAN 80,319 16.8
20 5 0.2 0.6582 6 0.46123 11 0
10430600
CLAVERIA 52,478 22.1
390 40 1.8 0.4747 24 0.45266 12 0
10430900
GITAGUM 17,920 15.8
1 1 0.04 0.6967 2 0.44745 13 0
10431500
LIBERTAD 12,948 17.9
0 0 0 0.6766 3 0.44711 14 0
10430100
ALUBIJID 32,163 14.9
140 10 0.4 0.6539 7 0.44662 15 0
10431800
MANTICAO 29,469 17.7
135 25 1 0.5719 16 0.42892 16 0
10432100
OPOL 66,327 12.7
50 50 2 0.5852 13 0.42484 17 0
10431600
LUGAIT 20,559 14.1 112 20 0.8 0.6201 8 0.42341 18 0
10430700
EL SALVADOR 58,771 13.3 0 0 0 0.6188 9 0.40823 19 0
10431900
MEDINA 35,612 18.2 167 15 0.6 0.5237 22 0.40783 20 0
10431300
LAGONGLONG 24,190 18.9 135 20 0.8 0.5212 23 0.40575 21 0
10430300
BALINGOAN 11,020 18.5 190 19 0.76 0.5212 23 0.40416 22 0
10432200
SALAY 29,998 17.3 150 5 0.2 0.536 21 0.39908 23 0
10432300
SUGBONGCOGON 9,764 17.9 20 20 0.8 0.5483 18 0.39543 24 0
10430400
BINUANGAN 7,441 17.1 20 5 0.2 0.5429 20 0.37867 25 0
 Figure 3.1.3 EVSA Map of Cacao in Misamis Oriental

3.1.3 Cacao Industry Strategic Development Directions and Investment Plan

Investment Plan

In line with the trust of the new administration that Misamis Oriental “PAGLAUM”. The thrust in agriculture sector is to be
sustainable agriculture thru organic and resilient farming practices. Because of the limited farm holding of the majority of the
farmer in the province, intercropping / multiple cropping systems especially under coco will be promoted. With this farmer’s
income per hectare will increase at least 20% by 2026.

At present the province has an existing coconut area of about 101,698 hectares the subject for intercropping with cacao,
banana, abaca and cassava. The government of Misamis Oriental pursue the development of cacao industry. In the last
administration the Governor already signed a Memorandum of Agreement with KFI, created Technical Working Group (TWG)
whose goal was to develop the policy and strategy on cacao including identification of beneficiaries and validation of project
area. It also aims to develop at least 1,000 hectares in 2015 up to 4,000 hectares benefitting 4,000 farmers by the year 2026
and at least 75% of cacao farm will be GAP certified.

Cacao Industry Strategic Development Directions

Misamis Oriental envisions to be a chocolate capital in Northern Mindanao by having a robust local economy and agricultural
productivity hence, cacao is eyed as the top priority commodity. This can be attained through employing an area-focused
development strategy to expand areas planted and increase productivity.

In order for the province, to participate in global value chain, the following are the strategies to be adopted that would increase
production of higher value cacao beans:

 Focus on fine flavor cacao bean competitiveness to avoid saturated commodity space and provide better domestic
linkages for brand chocolate manufacturing sector;
 Expand production through knowledge base and capacity improvement through public R&D, provision of farm
infrastructure and post-harvest facilities, and skills training; and
 Support business management and entrepreneurship through market linkage programs, public financing and skills
training.
3.1.4: PCIP Gap Matrix of Cocoa Bean Value Chain in Misamis Oriental
Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: including # of farmers/ Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures & Other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province enterprise or infrastructure, fisherfolk reached, if MF Geologic, Pests for subproject Funds
business enabling program, applicable O & Diseases) Implementation
etc.)
INPUT PRODUCTION/PROVISION
Limited number of Establishment of 5 nurseries with bud Gingoog Jasaan Established Utilize LGU and DA DA- 1,500 1,000 DA-
accredited Accredited Nurseries with wood / scion groove / / nurseries for monitoring quality PRDP,PLGU/ PRDP ,PLGU
nurseries resulting bud wood/scion groove garden established& Lagongl Claveri produce low standards ATI /MLGU,& / ATI/
to: garden with quality produced 29,000,000 ong/ a/Alubij quality implementation& Farmer MLGU,&
-Lack of supply of varieties (high fat content seedlings Naawan id seedlings assistance to comply Cooperatives Farmer
grafted seedlings of and flavour) - BPI nursery Cooperatives
high yielding unsustainable
varieties nurseries

-inconsistent quality Skills training on nursery Capability Building Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. 500 500 500
of planting and bud wood /scion Or. Or.
materials available groove gardening
in the market establishment
Limited utilization of Information Campaign on Conduct of Trainings Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. 500 500 500
grafted seedlings the benefits of using 2 /year & distribution of Or. Or.
quality grafted seedlings 30,000 Techno guides
and the existing accredited
nurseries Distributed 100
Plant Now Pay Later seedlings/ farmer All All All
/Seedling Subsidy Project Cacao Cacao Cacao 5,000 5,000 5,000
LGUs LGUs LGUs
Grafted planting -Procurement of BR-25 Available budded/ All All All 30,000 30,000 30,000
materials not being and UF-18 varieties grafted seedlings of BR- Cacao Cacao Cacao
readily available 25 and UF-18 varieties LGUs LGUs LGUs
within proximity of be distributed thru Plant
farms and at the Now pay Later
times when
the:farmers needed -Encourage establishment Planting materials
them of more accessible available by the farmers
nursery to the farmers at all time

76
Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: including # of farmers/ Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures & Other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province enterprise or infrastructure, fisherfolk reached, if MF Geologic, Pests for subproject Funds
business enabling program, applicable O & Diseases) Implementation
etc.)
. Limited Upgrading and scaling up 5 Organic fertilizer Magsays Talisay Mantic Farmers Info campaign to DA,PLGU, 2,500 1,500 1,000 DA,PLGU,
availability and of existing fertilizer Center upgraded ay/ an/ ao/ would not promote benefits and ATI/ ,MLGU MLGU /ATI &
commercial enterprises including Gingoog Lagong Lugait acquire, pay awareness. &Farmer Farmer
distribution of assistance to get the / long/ and apply Enforcement of Cooperatives Cooperatives
organic fertilizer necessary 1/Municipality w/out Jasaan/ Naawa organic ordinances/policy to
certification/accreditation Upgraded Organic Claveria/ n fertilizer in reduce use of
Fertilizer Center Alubijid their farms. chemicals and
Set-up of community- emissions. Financial 1,500 1,500
based organic fertilizer Medina/ Sugbo services adapted to
plant (CBOFP) Kinoguit ngcogo product cycle and
an n/ farmer´s cash flow.
Salay
Low use of fertilizer -Capability Building on -2 Trainings/year Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. 1,000 1,000 1,000
among smallholders GAP Cacao Or. Or.
due to lack of 100 bags/ farmers
understanding
among farmers on -Fertilizer Subsidy All All All 5,000 5,000 5,000
cost benefits of Program/ Apply Now Pay Cacao Cacao Cacao
proper and efficient Later LGUs LGUs LGUs
use of fertilizer, and
limited purchasing
capacity
Inadequate Conduct training on proper Capacitated cacao Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Climate, Conduct Proper and 500 500 500
technology/ soil nutrient management growers/farmers on Or. Or. Drought, Soil Strict Training
knowledge on proper fertilizer Erosion
proper fertilizer management and
management & application
application
Crop Integration Coconut + Banana + Establishment of 3 Gingoog Lagon- Jasaan Climate, Conduct proper 500 500 500
Cacao Farming System Demo City long Drought, Soil demo establishment
Erosion
High cost of Dissemination of success Conduct forum cacao MIs. Or. Mis. Mis. 1,000 1,000 1,000
chemical inputs to stories and emerging good growers present their Or. Or.
farmers and practices success story on GAP
environment

77
Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: including # of farmers/ Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures & Other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province enterprise or infrastructure, fisherfolk reached, if MF Geologic, Pests for subproject Funds
business enabling program, applicable O & Diseases) Implementation
etc.)
FARMING/ PRODUCTION
Limited outreach of Provide fast and efficient Provision of 2 vehicles PLGU Existing Disseminate success DA,PLGU, 0.500 DA,PLGU,
existing extension extension services to technology and new stories on higher MLGU & ATI MLGU &
services and providers/1 cacao yields and lower Farmer ATIFarmer
providers vehicle/District farmers still production costs Cooperatives Cooperatives
TOT on GAP Cacao 1 Training/year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. hesitant to incurred using 500 500 500
Establishment of Techno- 2 demo /year Gingoog Jasaan/ Claveria/ use upgraded technology 1,000 1,000 1,000
demo showcasing GAP on 2 technology provider/ /Salay Naawan Salay upgraded
Cacaoand development of cacao doctors 1 / ict technology/
cacao doctors/ technology PLGU better 700
provider quality plt.
Low uptake and Giving Incentives to GAP At least 50% of Cacao All All All Cacao materials 1,000 1,000 1,000
adoption of good Farm Certified farm will be GAP Cacao Cacao Areas
agricultural Certified Areas Areas
practices and
sustainable
production practices
Lack of capacity to Technical and Financial At Least 50% of cacao All All All Cacao 1,000 1,000 1,000
comply with support to Farmers that farmers will comply Cacao Cacao Areas
certification will comply GAP GAP Certification Areas Areas
requirements certification
Current cacao bean Utilize contract growing Organized cacao All All All Cacao DA,PLGU, 500 500 500 DA,PLGU,
production is very agreements by integrators growers/farmers; Cacao Cacao Areas MLGU & ATI MLGU & ATI
low. or through cooperatives to Areas Areas Farmer Farmer
facilitate access to Cooperatives Cooperatives
resources needed to start
cacao growing
Conduct extension service Conducted farm visits, All All All Cacao 500 500 500
to educate and encourage and encouraged Cacao Cacao Areas
farmers on viability and farmers to venture on Areas Areas
high returns of cacao cacao production
production

78
Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including # Sub 2023 2024 2024 2025 (Climate, Measures & Other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province enterprise or infrastructure, of farmers/ fisherfolk MF Geologic, for subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) reached, if applicable O Pests & Implementation
Diseases)
Conduct training on production Conducted training Mis. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Climate Adopt Organic DTI, ATI, 500 500 500 DTI, ATI,
technology to plant 3 or more on complete cacao Or. Change Agriculture and/or DA,PLGU, DA,PLGU,
varieties of cacao; production IPM MLGU MLGU
technology &,Farmer &,Farmer
Selecting pest and disease Procurement of good Cooperatives Cooperatives
resistant varieties; quality and resistant
seed stocks to pest
Proper fertilizer and nutrient and diseases
management
Prevalence of Training of pest and diseases Pest and Diseases Mis. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Climate, Adopt proper DTI, ATI, 500 500 500 DTI, ATI,
cacao pest & prevention and link/access to management on Or. Drought, establishment of DA,PLGU, DA,PLGU,
diseases researchers and experts on cacao Soil demo farm using MLGU MLGU
cacao production Erosion Organic Agriculture &,Farmer &,Farmer
and/or IPM Cooperatives Cooperatives
Poor and inefficient Provide hauler/cargo vehicles Procured PLGU PLGU PLGU/MLGU 3,000 3,000 PLGU/MLGU
transport services Huler/cargo & Farmers & Farmers
vehicles to cater the Cooperative Cooperative
product of 13 LGUs

FERMENTATION AND DRYING

Lack of access to Establishment of GMP Established 1 Gingoo Jasaan/ Naawan/ DTI, 1,000 1,000 1,000 DTI,
facilities to compliant common service CSF /Growth area g City/ Claveria/ Manticao DA,PLGU, DA,PLGU,
consistently facilities (CSF) for Salay Alubijid MLGU MLGU
produce high quality fermentation, drying, packing, &,Farmer &,Farmer
fermented dry storage, and transport Cooperatives Cooperatives
beans. services.

Limited know-how Development of a core group 1 Core Group/ CSF GBDA/ GBDA/ GBDA/ DTI, ATI, 1,600 1,600 1,600 DTI, ATI,
and skills on Good of local experts to provide MISOR MISORE MISORET DA,PLGU, DA,PLGU,
Manufacturing hands-on training and ET/CL T/CLAJA /CLAJAV MLGU MLGU
Practices (GMP) mentoring to users of AJAVE VETA/G ETA/GALI &,Farmer &,Farmer
and Sustainable postharvest facilities as TA/GA ALILEO/ LEO/MAN Cooperatives Cooperatives
Production embedded service of CSF LILEO/ MANLU LUNA
MANL NA
UNA

79
Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including # Sub 20 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures & Other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of Funds
Province enterprise or infrastructure, of farmers/ fisherfolk MF 23 Geologic, for subproject
business enabling program, etc.) reached, if applicable O Pests & Implementation
Diseases)
Training on GMP on Cacao 1 training/ year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DTI, DA- 500 500 500 DTI, DA-
PRDP, PLGU, PRDP, PLGU,
ATI/ MLGU
MLGU ,Farmer /ATI,Farmer
Cooperatives Cooperatives
Limited technology Provision of hands-on- Cacao Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. 500 500 500
on the proper training Growers/workers
storage of cacao On proper storage of cacao are capacitated
Cacao seeds are Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. 500 500 500
properly dried and
stored, and high
quality seed beans
produced
PROCESSING (TABLEA & CHOCOLATE)
Limited product Development of new tablea & TOT on Cacao Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DTI, DA- 500 500 500 DTI,
lines chocolate -based products and Processing and PRDP, PLGU, DA,PLGU,
Brand development and product packaging MLGU ,Farmer MLGU ,Farm
market development campaign (Tablea & chocolate Cooperatives er
based products) Cooperatives
Establishment of Tablea/ 2 Processing Plant Gingoog Naawan 150,000 150,000
Chocolate Processing Plant Established City
with complete Machineries and
Equipment for tablea &
chocolate production &
Marketing
Non-GMP Establishment of GMP Established 3 GMP Gingoog Jasaan Naawan 1,500 1,500 1,500
compliant compliant Cacao Processing Cacao Processing City
manufacturing Facilities (Tables & Chocolate Center (Tablea &
facilities and Based) Chocolate Based)
processes

Capability Building on GMP Conducted training Gingoog Jasaan Naawan 500 500 500
on GMP City

Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including # Sub (Climate, Measures & Other Players Source of
80
 Cacao bean 100 100 100
production
increased
Implementation of a targeted At least 75% of the All All All Cacao 5,000 5,000 5,000
input voucher program or growers access Cacao Cacao LGU
similar mechanism to financing LGU LGU
encourage establishment
and/ or rehabilitation of cocoa
farmers
Linking existing and 5,000 5,000 5,000
prospective cacao farmers to
potential lenders/financial
institutions through
symposia/fora

Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including # Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures & Other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province enterprise or infrastructure, of farmers/ fisherfolk MF Geologic, Pests & for subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) reached, if applicable O Diseases) Implementation
Banana and coconut Promotion of intercropping of Conduct All All All All Cacao DA,DTI, 500 500 500 500 DA,DTI,
farmers not aware of cacao (coconut and banana training/seminar on Cacao Cacao Cacao LGUs PLGU, PLGU,
opportunities and farms) in identified expansion Intercropping LGUs LGUs LGUs MLGU ,Farme MLGU ,Farm
viability of cacao – areas parallel to securing r Cooperatives er
coconut and cacao – markets for additional volume Cooperatives
banana intercropping. Dissemination of information Information 100 100 100 100
Majority do not have on cacao farming dissemination
the upfront resources opportunities including conducted
to establish cacao success stories in a variety of Cacao 250 250 250 250
farms. ways—print materials, in- growers/farmers are
person events, videos, and encouraged to
main-stream media—to venture on cacao
ensure that as many farmers farming
as possible can hear and
understand the
Low market price Encourage and train farmers Conducted training All All All All Cacao 500 500 500 500
to engage in value adding of in value adding Cacao Cacao Cacao LGUs
products (Tablea, Sikwate, LGUs LGUs LGUs
Vinegar, Chocolate,
Cacao Powder, and
etc.)
Implementation of a targeted Negotiated market All All All Cacao 200 200 200
input voucher program or prices Cacao Cacao LGUs
similar mechanism to LGUs LGUs

81
 encourage establishment
and/or rehab. of cacao farms;
Promotion of forward contract Tied-up with cacao
agreements to ensure investors on market
markets prices stability and prices and financial
facilitate access to financial resources
resources. Work with
MFIs/banks in development
of value
Development of database of Cacao beans from
cooperatives interested to go small farm delivered
into contract growing in bulk
agreement corresponding
areas

Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including # Sub (Climate, Measures & Other Players Source of
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province enterprise or infrastructure, of farmers/ fisherfolk MF Geologic, for subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) reached, if applicable O Pests & Implementation
Diseases)
Less access to Promotion of long term Assured market of All All All All Cacao DA,DTI, 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 DA,DTI,
marketing contractual commitment cacao assured Cacao Cacao Cacao LGUs PLGU, PLGU, MLGU
under an ethical and LGUs LGUs LGUs MLGU ,Farme ,Farmer
responsible trading r Cooperatives
relationships Cooperatives
Behaviour change Coops capacitated
interventions and capacity and management
building (coops) on supply aspect improved
chain management and and marketing of
chain governance products assured.
Harmonization of Tie up with reliable
interpretation of standards investors
and corresponding price
differentials including
development of chainwide
quality assurance and
traceability system
Technical assistance in the Engaged in contract
harmonization of growing
interpretation of standards
and the development of
pricing structure based on
standards and enforcement

82
 Strengthen capacity of Price monitoring
existing formal and informal updated/
information systems to strengthened
disseminate accurate price
and market information
Development of capacity of Bulked delivery of
farmers to incrementally quality cacao beans
associate, collaborate, and through coops
coordinate to achieve
economies of scale in their
transactions and to become
attractive partners to large
buyers
Support to groups to start low Organized and
risk collective activities that capacitated new
provide quick wins and coops
tangible benefits (self and
group)
Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including # Sub (Climate, Measures & Other Players Source of
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province enterprise or infrastructure, of farmers/ fisherfolk MF Geologic, for subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) reached, if applicable O Pests & Implementation
Diseases)
Organizational development Conducted training All Cacao All All All Cacao DA,DTI, 500 500 500 500 DA,DTI,
support to farmers - Farmers are LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs PLGU, PLGU, MLGU
complemented with capacitated/develop LGUs LGUs MLGU ,Farme ,Farmer
behaviour change ed their skills on r Cooperatives
interventions and cacao growing Cooperatives
entrepreneurial skills
Support to promotion and Information on 200 200 200 200
operationalization of block block farming
farming including mapping of disseminated
cacao zone Cacao zones
mapping
established
Dominance of spot Strengthening of cooperatives Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or DA,DTI, 100 2,000 1,500 1,500 DA,DTI,
transactions makes Establishment of Display PLGU, PLGU, MLGU
farmers more Center in all Tourist Spot of Gingoog Magsay- Talisayan/ MLGU ,Farme ,Farmer
vulnerable to price the province / Salay/ say/ Balingasag r Cooperatives
fluctuation. Jasaan/ Lagongl / Opol Cooperatives
Naawan ong/
manti-
cao
Poor and inefficient Provision of hauling trucks 1Hauling Truck Gingoog Claveria Naawan DA/PLGU/ 10,000 10,000 5,000 DA/PLGU/
transport services /Growth Area / Salay / Opol MLGU/Coop/F MLGU/Coop/
I FI
INTERFIRM RELATIONSHIPS/VCA GOVERNANCE

83
 Limited of supply of Encourage nurseries operator Increased All Cacao All All All Cacao Climate Procurement DA/PLGU/ DA/PLGU/
grafted seedlings of for BPI accreditation availability of LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs of pests and MLGU/Coop MLGU/Coop
high yielding grafted seedlings LGUs LGUs diseases
varieties and high yielding resistant
varieties (BR-25, seedlings
UF-18, PBC-123,
and etc.)
Tie-up with BPI Davao City Available All Cacao All All All Cacao DA/PLGU/ DA/PLGU/
on the availability of scions budded/grafted LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs MLGU/Coop MLGU/Coop
seedlings of BR- LGUs LGUs
25, UF-18, PBC-
123, and other
varieties
Upgrading to produce good Produced good All Cacao All All All Cacao DA/PLGU/ DA/PLGU/
quality scions and scaling up quality cacao LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs MLGU/Coop MLGU/Coop
of existing certified budwood planting materials LGUs LGUs
gardens and
Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including # Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures & Other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province enterprise or infrastructure, of farmers/ fisherfolk MF Geologic, for subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) reached, if applicable O Pests & Implementation
Diseases)
Development of distribution Tied-up with local All Cacao All All All Cacao Climate Procurement of DA,DTI, 100 100 100 100 DA,DTI,
network/ retail network to input suppliers in the LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs pests and PLGU, PLGU,
ensure proximity of supply to locality. LGUs LGUs diseases MLGU ,Farme MLGU ,Farm
farmers to lessen the effect resistant r Cooperatives er
of stress to cacao seedlings seedlings Cooperatives
Develop capacity of organic Organic input All Cacao All All All Cacao 100 100 100 100
inputs providers and retailers providers technically LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs
to deliver technical advice to equipped LGUs LGUs
farmer clients and basic soil
test analysis or via
partnership with providers of
soil analysis
Support to MFIs/banks in the Assisted cacao All Cacao All All All Cacao 100 100 100 100
development of appropriate growers in the LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs
financial product (e.g., value preparation of farm LGUs LGUs
chain financing) for input plan and budget
procurement
Limited access to Linking existing and Farmers have All Cacao All All All Cacao 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
financial alternatives prospective cacao farmers to access to financial LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs
that would allow the potential leaders /financial alternatives LGUs LGUs
purchase of farm institutions through
inputs symposium /forum
Lack know-how and Development of a core group Core group are All Cacao All All All Cacao 500 500 500 500
skills on Good of local experts to provide organized and LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs
Manufacturing hands-on training and capacitated LGUs LGUs
84
Practices (GMP) and mentoring to users of
Sustainable postharvest facilities as
Production Practices embedded service of CSF

Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Aras to be covered 2026Major Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Gap/ Constraint in VC Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including # Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 Risks Measures & Other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in the enterprise or infrastructure, of farmers/ fisherfolk MF (Climate, for subproject Funds
Province business enabling program, etc.) reached, if applicable O Geologic, Implementation
Pests &
Diseases)
Lack of technology on Upgrading of processed Supply of good quality All Cacao All All All Cacao DA,DTI, DA,DTI,
the processing of cacao products and tablea and chocolate LGUs Cacao Cacao LGUs PLGU, PLGU,
good quality development of related products sustained LGUs LGUs MLGU ,Farme MLGU ,Farm
processed cacao products that Mindanao can and tied-up with r Cooperatives er
sustain as a marketing exporter Cooperatives
proposal in the domestic
market with a view of laying
the groundwork for export
sales
Lack of information Dissemination of information Information Caravan
on the benefits of on cacao farming /School –on – the -
cacao production opportunities including air conducted
success stories in a variety of
ways—print materials, in-
person events, videos, and
main-stream media—to
ensure that as many farmers
as possible can hear and
understand the message
Lack of market-based Promotion of long term Assured market of
/price incentives for contractual commitment produce
farmers to produce under an ethical and
quality beans responsible trading
relationship
85
Low adoption of good Capability Building GAP adopted by
agricultural practices farmers
and sustainable Establishment and/or scaling- Farmer leaders
production practices up of Farmer Field Schools or capacitated on FFS
Cacao doctos/masters and became Cacao
including assistance in the Doctors
development of commercially
viable services to ensure
financial sustainability of
FFS/Cacao Doctor

Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Development in the Intervention (subprojects: including # of farmers/ Sub (Climate, Measures & Other Players Source of
Province enterprise or infrastructure, fisherfolk reached, if MF Geologic, for subproject Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
business enabling program, etc.) applicable O Pests & Implementation
Diseases)
Limited Laboratory Creation of Provincial Soils Additional laboratory PLGU PLGU Geological Laboratory DA,DTI, 1,000 1,000 DA,DTI,
facilities Laboratory access for farmers Area should be PLGU, PLGU,
Tie up with the City Agriculture MOA for the usage of PLGU PLGU accessible to MLGU ,Farme 100 100 100 MLGU ,Farm
Office and CMU Soils soils laboratory the majority of r Cooperatives er
Laboratory farmers/coops Cooperatives
Less project Strengthen multi-agricultural Conducted forum Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
prioritization to board and workshop
agriculture
Land Tenure Farmer beneficiaries should Cacao production
Status owned at least 0.25 ha. and area secured
with a potential area for
expansion
Lack of market- Technical assistance in the Capability Building Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or DA,DTI, 100 100 100 100 DA,DTI,
based /price harmonization of interpretation 1 /year PLGU, PLGU,
incentives for of standards and the MLGU ,Farme MLGU ,Farm
farmers to produce development of pricing r Cooperatives er
quality beans structure based on standards Cooperatives
and enforcement mechanism
Unhealthy -Strengthen capacity of Info Dissemination Mis. Or Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA,DTI, 200 200 200 200 DA,DTI,
competition among existing formal and informal during trainings PLGU, PLGU,
and between information systems to /forum MLGU ,Farme MLGU ,Farm
traders stifles disseminate accurate price r Cooperatives er
upgrading and and market information Cooperatives
provides
disincentives to -Establishment of quality Proper markings /
consistent assurance and traceability tagging must be

86
production of good system installed
quality beans.
Farmers lack Provide financial assistance to Cacao Mis. Or Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA,DTI, DA,DTI,
capital to establish cacao growers/ farmers Growers/farmers PLGU, PLGU,
and sustain cacao through loan availed of the financial MLGU ,Farme MLGU ,Farm
production assistance through r Cooperatives er
loan Cooperatives

Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MFO Target Aras to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Estimated Project Rank
Development in the Potential Intervention including # of farmers/ fisherfolk / 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures & Other 2023 2024 2025 2026 Cost (000)
Province (subprojects: enterprise reached, if applicable Su Geologic, Players for
or infrastructure, b Pests & subproject
business enabling MF Diseases) Implementation
program, etc.) O
Insufficient budget -Reorganizing project Prepared cacao project Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA-PRDP, 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 DA-PRDP, DTI,
to counterpart big team with regular proposal with available DTI, PLGU, PLGU,
ticket projects/Lack meeting and project funding support MLGU ,Farm MLGU ,Farmer
of local financial proposal preparation er Cooperatives
funding workshop Cooperatives

-Strengthen linkages
with other funding
institutions,
agencies/offices
Farmers lack Provide financial Cacao Growers/farmers Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA-PRDP, 5,000 5,000 5,000
capital to establish assistance to cacao availed of the financial DTI, PLGU,
and sustain cacao growers/ farmers assistance through loan MLGU ,Farm
farming through loan er
Cooperatives
Poor farm to market Upgrading/Concreting Construction of farm to MLGUs/ Setting up of DA-PRDP & DA-PRDP &
roads MLGUs/ of farm to market market roads: PLGUs do min. cost PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/MLGU
CLGUs/ PLGUs do roads for easy not have sharing to
not have sufficient conveyance of sufficient enable LGUs
capacity to agricultural Construction of Bonifacio – 7.00 km financial to finance 189,00
construct and/or commodities and Mindulao Road, Magsaysay capacity to counterpart 0
upgrade roads services as well as improve funds for the
reduced farm to Project,
transportation cost market

87
 Concreting of Pangpangon- 10 km DA-PRDP & 240,000 DA-PRDP,
Putting Balas-Sibantang- MLGU P/C/MLGU,
Mahayahay FMR -Talisayan NGA, etc

Construction of Tibon-Tibon- 15 km 580,,000

Cabalawan-Mindulao-Tama
FMR with Bridge,
Magsaysay
Construction of Cabantian – 10 km 270,00
Tulang-Kauswagan 0
Damayuhan Road ,
Magsaysay
Construction of Kandiis- 6.000 162,00
Tibon-Tibon Road, km 0
Magsaysay

Key Gap/ Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, M Target Areas to be covered Major Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Potential Intervention including # of farmers FO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Risks Adoption Players & other 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in the (subprojects: reached, if applicable / (Climate Measure Players Funds
Province (from the enterprise or Su geologic,
national & regional infrastructure, b/ pest &
VCA results) business enabling M diseases)
program, etc.) FO
Construction of Mahayahay 11.530 MLGUs, PLGU, 311,00 MLGUs, PLGU,
– Katipunan-Gumabon- km DA, PRDP 1 DA, PRDP
Tama Road, Magsaysay
Concreting of Kibungsod – 2 km 54,000
Cabantian Circuferencial
Road, Magsaysay
Concreting of FMR Along 3 km 90,000
Purok 5-A & Purok 5-B of
Brgy. Pagawan, Manticao
Concreting of FMR 4 km 120,000
Donque, Upper Malibog,
Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 5 km 150,000
Barangay Balintad,
Manticao

88
 Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 54,000
Sambuyaan Road, km
Manticao
Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km 97,200
Kolambugan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province (subprojects: reached, if applicable Sub/ geologic, pest & other Funds
(from the national & enterprise or MF & diseases) Players
regional VCA infrastructure, O
results) business enabling
program, etc.)
Concreting Pagawan- 3.00 km MLGUs, 81,000 MLGUs,
Suminanap Road, PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
Manticao PRDP PRDP
Concreting Paniangan 0.70 km 18,900
Brgy. Road, Manticao
Concreting Tuod Purok 0.50 km 13,500
7 , Manticao
Concreting of Balintad – 1.5 km 40,000
Victory Road, Manticao
Concreting of Mahayahay 3.00 km 81,000
– Kilablab, Manticao
Concreting of Mahayahay 3.00 km 81,000
– Limonda, Manticao
Concreting of Donque 3.00 81,000
Hill, Manticao km
Concreting of Bagares 0.50 13,500
St., Manticao km
Concreting of Sabuero 0.30 8,100
St., Manticao km

89
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential including # of farmers reached, O/ 2023 202 2025 2026 (Climate Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province Intervention if applicable Sub/ 4 geologic, pest & other Funds
(from the national & (subprojects: MF & diseases) Players
regional VCA enterprise or O
results) infrastructure,
business enabling
program, etc.)
Concreting of Cementery 0.30 km MLGUs, 8,100 MLGUs,
Road, Manticao PLGU, DA, PLGU,
PRDP DA,
PRDP
Concreting of Mahayag- 3.50 km 94,500
Digkilaan, Manticao
Concreting of Magpait – 2.50 67,500
Camanga Road, Manticao km
Concreting of Sagyawan – 3.00 km 81,000
Malibato, Manticao
Concreting of Mananum 6.5 km 174,000
Daan-Kabol-Kabol FMR
with Bridge, Medina
Mananum Daan – Labas 3 km 81,000
Pagsama FMR, Medina
Duka – Dig-aguyan FMR, 3 km 81,000
Medina
Bulwa – Mananum Bag-o 3.000 81,000
FMR, Medina km
Pahindong–Macopa FMR, 3.000 81,000
Medina km
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential including # of farmers reached, O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province Intervention if applicable Sub/ geologic, pest & other Funds
90
(from the national & (subprojects: MF & diseases) Players
regional VCA enterprise or O
results) infrastructure,
business enabling
program, etc.)
South Poblacion FMR, Medina 2 km MLGUs, 54,000 MLGUs,
PLGU, DA, PLGU,
PRDP DA,
PRDP
Pahindong–Macopa FMR, 3.000 81,000
Medina km
Tupon- Maanyag FMR, 3.000 81,000
Medina km
San Vicente – Kiiwang, 3 km 81,000
Medina
San Vicente – Sidlakan, 2 km 54,000
Medina
Bangbang Sidlakan, 3 km 81,000
Medina
San Jose – Hollywood, 4 km 108,000
Medina
Mananum Bag-o – Baluarte 3 km 81,000
FMR, Medina
Portulin – Dig-aguyan FMR, 3 km 81,000
Medina
Gasa – Hangaron FMR, 3 km 81,000
Medina
San Roque FRM, Medina 3 km 81,000
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential including # of farmers reached, O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province Intervention if applicable Sub/ geologic, pest & other Funds
(from the national & (subprojects: MF & diseases) Players
regional VCA enterprise or O
results) infrastructure,
business enabling
program, etc.)
Maanas – San Vicente FMR, 3 km MLGUs, 81,000 MLGUs,
Medina PLGU, DA, PLGU,
PRDP DA,
PRDP
San Isidro – Labas Pagsama 3 km 81,000
FMR, Medina
Mimbolo – Natugod FMR, 3 km 81,000
Medina
91
 Road Concreting at Upper 7 km 189,000
Malibud to Dinawehan
FMR, Gingoog City
Road Concreting Crossing 4 km 108,000
San Miguel to Kalagonoy
FMR, Gingoog City
Concreting of Gingoog to 70.91 1,914,570
Claveria National Road, 0 km.
Gingoog & Claveria
Concreting of Maanas- 8.600 232,200
Kibuguing Road, Medina & km.
Gingoog City
Concreting of Kabug- 7.000 189,000
Sidlakan Road, Medina & km.
Gingoog City
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential including # of farmers reached, O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province Intervention if applicable Su geologic, pest & other Funds
(from the national & (subprojects: b/ & diseases) Players
regional VCA enterprise or MF
results) infrastructure, O
business enabling
program, etc.)
Concreting of San Luis – 5.500 MLGUs, 148,500 MLGUs,
Kibuging Road, Gingoog km. PLGU, DA, PLGU,
City PRDP DA,
PRDP
Concreting of Talisay- 4.000 108,000
Mahayahay Road, Gingoog km.
City & Magsaysay
Concreting of Consuelo- 7.000 189,000
Abunda-Tinaan FMR, km.
Magsaysay
Concreting of Pangpangon- 10 Km 240,000
Putting Balas-Sibantang-
Mahayahay FMR -Talisayan
Upgrading of Sumalag-Calubo 2.11 65,000
Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Salicapan- 2.9 km 78,300
Suarez FMR-Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Panabol-Buko 1.34 36,180
FMR-Kinoguitan km

92
 Upgrading of Calubo- 1.726 46,602
Poblacion FMR, Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Calubo-Kitotok 1.16 31,320
FMR, Kinoguitan

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential including # of farmers reached, O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province Intervention if applicable Sub geologic, pest & & other Funds
(from the national & (subprojects: / diseases) Players
regional VCA enterprise or MF
results) infrastructure, O
business enabling
program, etc.)
Concreting of Cebukawon 4 km 320,000
FMR, Tagoloan

Concreting of Nasalaban – 2 km 54,000

Subaya FMR, Tagoloan

Concreting of Natumolan- 4 km 120,000

Maribojoc FMR, Tagolan

Rehabilitation of Rosario 3 km 90,000

FMR, Tagoloan

Concreting of Danao FMR, 5 km 150,000

Tagoloan

Concreting of Rosario – 2.2 176,000

Comocomo FMR, Tagoloan km
Concreting of Mananum- 1.6 km 43,961
Claveria FMR with Bridge,
Balingasag

93
 Concreting of Kibalua FMR, 4.3 km 116,500
Balingasag

Key Gap/ Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Potential including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in the Intervention reached, if applicable Sub geologic, pest & & other Funds
Province (from the (subprojects: / diseases) Players
national & regional enterprise or MF
VCA results) infrastructure, O
business enabling
program, etc.)
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 MLGUs, 125,500 MLGUs,
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad km PLGU, DA, PLGU,
FMR, Balingasag PRDP DA, PRDP
Tongkalan-Seriwagan- 5.62 151,740
Kimagas FMR, Alubijid km
Upgrading of Domagooc to 4.000 108,000
Sitio Patrocenio FMR, km.
Jasaan
Upgrading of Solana to 3.000 81,000
SitioLooc FMR, Jasaan km.
Upgrading of Sitio Katu-an, 5.000 135,000
Natubo – km.
KimamaonKimaya FMR,
Jasaan
Upgrading of San Antonio 6.000 162,000
to Sitio Cogon FMR, km.
Jasaan
Concreting of San Nicolas- 16 km 432,000
Upper Antonio-IS-Cruz
Road, Jasaan
Concreting of Aplaya to 11km 297,000

94
 Brgy. Imelelda Road
Jasaan

Key Gap/ Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Potential Intervention including # of farmers reached, O/ 2023 2024 2025 202 (Climate Adoption Players & other 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in (subprojects: if applicable Su 6 geologic, pest & Measure Players Funds
the Province (from enterprise or b/ diseases)
the national & infrastructure, MF
regional VCA business enabling O
results) program, etc.)
Construction of Sitio Bato, Brgy. 4km MLGUs, PLGU, 75,000 MLGUs,
Kimaya FMR, Villanueva DA, PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Construction of FMR with slope 0.61 km 85,000
Protection and sheet piles (300
meters long) in Sitio macusi,
Barangay Kimaya, Villanueva
Upgrading /Concreting of 6 km 162,000
Oguis-Bandrera FMR, Initao
Upgrading of Sapong – 5.51 148,770
Mamiguis-Bansilang FMR, km
Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 3 km 90,000
Calacapan Calanyugan –
Kimalok FMR, Initao
Concreting of Mapulog – 4 km 92,400
Tuboran FMR with Arc bridges
component, Naawan
Concreting of Suwa-Bangko 4.58 137,400
Lubilan FMR, Naawan km
Concreting of Mat-I Lubilan 8.27 km 165,400
FMR, Naawan
Lubilan to Mambuntan Road, 3 km 90,000
Naawan
Lubilan to Mahanggub Road, 2 km 60,000

95
 Naawan
Tagbalogo P8 to Pasagdihon 4 km 120,000
FMR, Naawan
Mat-I to Pasagdihon FMR, 3 km 90,000
Naawan
Centro Don Pedro to Macawa 2.309 km 60,500
Road, Naawan
Don Pedro to Linangkayan 2 km 60,000
FMR, Naawan

Key Gap/ Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Potential Intervention including # of farmers reached, O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Adoption Players & other 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in (subprojects: if applicable Su geologic, pest & Measure Players Funds
the Province (from enterprise or b/ diseases)
the national & infrastructure, MF
regional VCA business enabling O
results) program, etc.)
Tuboran to Aluna FMR, 1.5 MLGUs, PLGU, 45,000 MLGUs,
Naawan km DA, PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Bangcalon to Tuboran FMR, 2.5 km 75,000
Naawan
Linangkayan Highway to Don 4 km 120,000
Pedro FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Poblacion to 7 km 210,000
Patag FMR, Naawan
Mat-I Linugos to Tagbalogo 6 km 180,000
FMR, Naawan
Don Pedro to Digcamara FMR, 3 km 90,000
Naawan
Lapad to Tuboran Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Purok 3 Mapulog to 3 km 90,000
Tagbalogo FMR, Naawan
Digcamara Mapulog to 2 km 60,000
Cabilin Road, Naawan
Mapulog P2 to Banatihon 5.5 160,000
Road, Naawan km

96
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Adoption Players & other 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province (subprojects: enterprise reached, if applicable Su geologic, pest & Measure Players Funds
(from the national & or infrastructure, b/ diseases)
regional VCA business enabling MF
results) program, etc.) O
Tongkalan-Seriwagan- 5.62 MLGUs, PLGU, 151,740 MLGUs,
Kimagas FMR, Alubijid km DA, PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Mapulog P6 to P8 FMR, 5 KM 150,000
Naawan
Maputi P8 to P12 FMR, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Maputi to Tuboran, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Concreting of 10KM 200,000
Kalongonan-Kandal
FMR ,El Salvador
Concreting of Bugdang 2 km 54,000
FMR, Talisayan

Concreting of Minlimaw- 5 km 135,000

Mahayag FMR, Talisayan

Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,000

Mandahilag-Macopa FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Poblacion – 2 km 54,000
Sindangan FMR,
Talisayan

97
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Adoption Players & other 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province (subprojects: enterprise reached, if applicable Su pest & diseases) Measure Players Funds
(from the national & or infrastructure, business b/
regional VCA enabling program, etc.) MF
results) O
Concreting of Pook- 7 km MLGUs, PLGU, 189,000 MLGUs,
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan DA, PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Concreting of San Jose – 6 km 162,000
Bugdang –Mahayag FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting 0.70 18,900
PanianganBrgy. Road, km
Manticao
Concreting of Mintabon 5 km 135,000
–Sibantang FMR,
Talisayan
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.16 31,320
Kitotok FMR, Kinoguitan km
Constuction of Consuelo 6 km 162,000
(Kimaya)-Pag-asa FMR,
Magsaysay

98
III. PRIORITY COMMODITY CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

Commodity Value Chain 2: Cardava Banana

3.2 Commodity Value Chain 2: Banana (Cardava)

3.2.1 Priority Commodity Profile: Banana Cardava

Cooking bananas are categorically known as balbisiana cultivars. There are numerous cultivars under
this type such as Cardava, Abutan, Inabaniko, Turangkog, Sabangputi, Mundo, Gubao, SabasaHapon
and Bigihan. However, the most common cultivar with both social and economic importance is the
Cardava or Saba. Cardava has the largest and tallest stem attaining a height of four meters. Bunches
are big with 8 to 16 hands having 12 to 20 fingers per hand. The fruits are short and stubby and highly
angular. The skin is thick and yellow when ripe. The flesh is white, starchy, and fine textured, making it
ideal for cooking and processing.

Banana Cardava is one of the numerous cultivars of cooking bananas. Its global demand and
production reached to more than 50 million metric tons (MT) as an alternative dessert. Dessert bananas
Cardava accounts for more than 80% for the cooking bananas and plantains. It is a traditional Filipino
dessert. It is most often grown in backyards of rural households and in small farms. Banana Cardava
are grown mostly for either home consumption or for local markets.

Philippines were the third largest banana producer in the world after India and China. The country
accounted for about 9% of the global banana production. World production in 2012 decreased by 12%
over 2010 data. This was primarily due to crop destruction caused by typhoons and the outbreak of
diseases. Philippines are the only producer of cardava banana. Other countries such as Thailand,
Indonesia, Ecuador, and African nations have their own local cooking banana varieties.

Banana Cardava thrives in the Philippines wherein 60 percent of the country’s production came from
Mindanao to include Northern Mindanao. The country harvested an average of around 199 thousand
hectares (PSA,2018-2022) for 5-year period of Banana Cardava including the Saba. It contributes more
than 2.5 million metric tons of cooking bananas to world production (FAO).

Davao Region is the main producer of banana chips, Northern Mindanao including Misamis Oriental is
the largest supplier of fresh cardava for the retail markets and local cardava based snack food in key
urban areas in the Philippines. Although Soccksargen has companies engaged in banana chips, a
greater percentage of its production is sold fresh either to banana chips exporters or to traders dealing
with the fresh retail markets. Caraga also produces banana chips with a significant percentage geared
for the export market. Maguindanao in ARMM is a key supplier of fresh banana for banana chips
companies in Davao. Production in other provinces of ARMM is sold fresh in the local market. All of the
regions have thriving cardava-based snack food businesses consisting mainly of street vendors from
ambulant vendors selling boiled bananas in bus stations to turon and maruya stalls near schools, parks,
and malls.

In Northern Mindanao region, area harvested and production of Cardava is dominated by the province
of Lanao del Norte and Misamis Oriental

There are three key product subsectors in the cardava banana sector, namely:

 Banana chips: Chip products may be sweetened, honey-dipped, unsweetened, cinnamon- or

chocolate-flavored and salted. Chips are available in various cuts such as whole, halves,
quarters, diagonals, diced and broken cuts. Products are mainly geared for the export market.
  Cardava banana snack food: The most popular snacks made of cardava are the “banana cue”
(whole fried bananas dipped in brown sugar and sold in bamboo skewers) and “turon” (fried
banana spring rolls). Another popular cardava-based snack is the “maruya” or banana fritters.
These are usually consumed as mid-afternoon snacks. In the domestic market, most of the
cardava-based snack food is produced and traded by street vendors, school canteens, and
restaurants. During the recent years, at least three manufacturing companies in Mindanao
have started the export of frozen banana snack food (turon, boiled banana to countries with
significant Filipino and Asian population.

 Fresh cardava banana soild in domestic retail outlets which are made into various traditional
Filipino desserts and dishes such as the “pochero”.

Other by-products of the cardava banana are the catsup, vinegar, and flour. In Lanao del Norte, one
agrarian reform cooperative is engaged in the manufacture of catsup. Production though is still low and
market is currently limited within the locality and neighbouring provinces (via trade fairs).

The “puso” or the dark red inflorescence of the banana is also edible. Aside from cooking the “puso”
into the traditional “ginataan” or “kilawin”, it can also be made into vegetarian patties.

Banana peels are traditionally used as feeds or converted into organic fertilizer. Another alternative use
of banana peels is as meat substitute and extenders. It can also be utilized as a material for making
paper and paper boards. The leaves are used as packing materials in markets and traditional wrappings
of native dishes.

Northern Mindanao, including the province of Misamis Oriental is the dominant player in fresh banana
for retail markets in Manila, Cebu and other urban areas. Most of its fresh banana in Misamis Oriental is
ship out to Manila and Cebu via Cagayan de Oro. Similar to the procurement flow for fresh cardava for
banana chips exporters, bananas are collected weekly from farmers at their farms or these are brought
at the nearest buying agents. Assemblers usually work with buying stations and agents and pick up the
bananas collected weekly or twice a week. The assemblers sell the bananas to consignees based in
key urban areas. The consignees sell the bananas to wholesalers and jobbers who, in turn, distribute to
wet markets and supermarkets. In the wet markets, the greater percentage goes to the banana
cue/turon/ and other cardava-based snack food vendors.

From production areas, mix varieties of bananas are loaded into trucks and then transferred to non-
refrigerated vehicles for distribution to various markets. An assessment of the postharvest system
revealed that fruit may be handled as many as 3 times before shipment and up to 3 times before it
reached the final consumer. The shipper and consignee are the key players in the supply chain for they
handle the biggest volume of bananas. The greatest risk occurs during sea transport for 2 days because
of high transit temperatures and the bulk-loading practice. This can result in over ripening since a week
has already elapsed since harvesting.
 .

KEY FUNCTION AND KEY PLAYERS OF BANANA INDUSTRY

Figure 3.2.1 VCA MAP OF BANANA

Source: VCA on Banana

Cardava banana in the country from CY2018 to 2020 area harvested was increasing it
decreases in 2021and continuously decreasing in 2022 because some change their
crops plus the effect of climate change. In Northern Mindanao there was erratic trend an
up and down due to some area was utilize/ship to other crops and effect of climate
change. While Misamis Oriental area harvested from 2018 to 2019 increases then
slightly decreases in 2020, no changes in 2021 and slightly increases in 2022.

Table 3.2.1 Area Harvested of Cardava Banana (Hectare)

 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
National 179,000 188,200 201,000 199,000 187000
Northern Mindanao 33,575 33,353 34,215 33,353 32,300
Misamis Oriental 5,560 5,755 5,775 5,775 6,070

Volume of cardava banana production in the country for the last five years shows that production was
decreasing from 2018 to 2021 then slightly increases in 2022, because average yield decreases. For
Northern Mindanao volume of production has up and down trend because average yield was also
erratic up and down. In Misamis Oriental volume of production for the past five years was increasing
because average yield and area harvested was increasing.

Table 3.2.2 Volume of Production of Cardava Banana (MT)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

National 2,700,000 2,300,000 2,200,000 1,900,000 2,300,000
Northern Mindanao 404,000 358,000 451,000 419,000 421,000
Misamis Oriental 84,674 87,371 87,411.68 89,361.53 107,723.25

Production performance for the past five (5) years CY2018-2022, in the Philippines from 2018 to 2019
increases it slightly decreases in 2020 then it increases in 2021 then it decreases in 2022. While in
Northern Mindanao from 2018 it increases in 2019 and keep on decreasing from 2020 to 2022. In
Misamis Oriental yield performance per hectare from 2018 to 2020 slightly decreasing after which it
increases from 2021 to 2022.

Table 3.2.3 Average Yield of Cardava Banana (MT/Ha.)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

National 21.33 20.42 20.22 21.73 21.30
Northern Mindanao 20.12 20.55 20.44 20.21 20.11
Misamis Oriental 15.23 15.18 15.14 15.47 17.75

Table 3.2.4 Shows production performance in Misamis Oriental by municipality/city, the Table recorded
the top five (5) municipality/city of the province were Salay, Gingoog City, Jasaan, Balingasag and Opol.
The lowest producer was Laguindingan and Tagoloan. Based on cluster banana producing cluster are
Gingoog Bay Development Area (GBDA) Magsaysay to Balingoan, Misamis Oriental Eastern Town
(MISORET) and Manticao Naawan and Lugait (MANLUNA) cluster. The Table also shows the
expansion area committed by LGUs with a total of 1,795 hectares, the highest is in Claveria.

Table 3.2.4 Existing and Expansion Area Plus Production Performance of Cardava Banana by
 Municipality/City of Misamis Oriental CY2022

MUNICIPALITY Population Poverty Area No. of Production Expansion

Incidence (Ha.) Farmers (Mt.) Area
Involved (Ha.)
Magsaysay 36,803 25.8 278 278 4,934.5.00 100
Gingoog City 136,698 22.7 650 650 11,537.50 100
Medina 35,612 18.2 190 190 3,372.50 100
Talisayan 25,761 19.9 212 215 3,763.00 100
Balingoan 11,020 18.5 22 25 390.50 30
Kinoguitan 14,091 17.1 200 200 3,550.00 100
Sugbongcogon 9,764 17.9 150 250 2,662.05 50
Binuangan 7,441 17.1 50 60 887.5 50
Salay 29,998 17.3 695 695 12,336.25 100
Lagonglong 24,190 18.9 310 310 5,502.5 100
Balingasag 74,385 20.1 600 600 10,650.00 100
Jasaan 57,055 16.7 650 650 11,537.50 100
Villanueva 40,419 16.0 100 165 1,775.00
Claveria 52,478 22.1 25 25 443.75 250
Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 10 10 177.25 50
Opol 66,327 12.7 450 450 7,986.00 50
El Salvador 58,771 13.3 80 95 1,420.00 50
Alubijid 32,163 14.9 332 332 5,893.00 100
Laguindingan 26,363 15.2 8 10 142.00 50
Gitagum 17,920 15.8 28 28 497.00 30
Libertad 12,948 17.9 40 55 710.00 30
Initao 33,902 17.0 25 25 440.00 50
Naawan 22,444 16.7 300 350 5,325.00 30
Manticao 29,469 17.7 305 305 5,400.00 50
Lugait 20,559 14.1 360 360 6,390.00 25
Mis. Or. 957,900 21.4 6,070 6,333 107,723.25 1,795

Figure 3.2.2 COMMODITY MAP OF CARDAVA BANANA IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL

3.2.2 Commodity Strategic Development Directions and Investment Plan

Investment Plan

Production of Banana Cardava in Misamis Oriental continues to be a promising crop that will provide
income, employment opportunities and entrepreneurship ventures for the farmers and retail centers,
both in rural and urban areas of the province. It is the second top most priority of the province because
the province is suitable for banana production base on agronomic condition and has ready market.

Processing of Banana Cardava for a value adding produce of banana chips and other snack food, is
able to provide employment and entrepreneurial opportunities mostly in the urban public areas of the
province through the vendors in the markets, bus terminals, school campuses, government zones and
offices including the sidewalks.

Farmers who have ventured into Banana Cardava production are also able to earn from directly selling
their produce to consumers. Value Chain of Cardava variety plays an important role in providing income
to farmers in the rural areas, and vendors in the urban areas where income helps in their daily needs.
Farmers’ access towards better planting materials, capital and modern processing facility has been
determined as one of the key gaps that need to be addressed in up scaling the commodity. Further,
road network especially the farm-to-market roads in areas of production of Banana Cardava needed
improvement. These factors have to be considered in putting investment to fully develop the value chain
of cardava banana o the province.

Banana Cardava Industry Strategic Development Directions

Banana Cardava industry in Misamis Oriental is of great potential because it can be comparable with
other provinces in Northern Mindanao. Besides banana farmers was encourage to maintain and expand
their farm because of its agronomic suitability and presents of key players of the industry is present
especially banana cardava buyers which buy their products right in their farm. Thus production cost
became lesser since they can save transportation cost. Hence banana cardava production will be
promoted to increase its production to meet the growing demand of the commodity with their proposed
interventions.

The main direction of the province for cardava banana industry is to increase, sustain and be a leading
producer of fresh cardavabanana production in the Region and boost its competitive edge in the
domestic market with an ultimate aim of penetrating the national and eventually global marke to process
products thru adopting GAP technology, the key directions base on the banana VCA in Mindanao:

 Increase and stabilization of supply base of cardava banana for chips and other cardava-based
products through improved quality and productivity of cardava farms thru crop diversification /
intercropping to organic/ natural bananas.

 Set-up of value chain quality system infrastructure covering aspects on food safety standards
and traceability at least 75% of the farms will be GAP certified.

 Improvement of existing inter-firm cooperation as a means of enhancing levels of information,

innovation, upgrading, and compliance to market requirements/standards.

 Strengthening of support markets to provide services/products that would facilitate upgrading

of value chain players parallel to development of systems to ensure sustained access

 Development and introduction of new cardava based products and banana chip variants (e.g.,
all natural banana chips)

Promotion of banana in the province will not jeopardize the other equally important crops for food
security like corn, rice, vegetables other high value crops that already exist through in force crop
zombification/clustering. The province shall comply with the DA policy of “No conversion of rice and corn
areas so as not to affect the program of sustainable rice and corn as major crops of the country.
Contour farming is also promoted since some production areas are hilly, in fact an ordinance has been
approved to allocate the said project of five (5) Million pesos per year to develop hilly area top prevent
landslide and soil erosion.

The province will also establish the necessary Climate Change resilient infrastructure projects and post-
harvest facilities in support to the identified commodities.
 3.2.3 Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability Analysis (EVSA): Banana Cardava

The expanded vulnerability and suitability analysis (EVSA) for Banana Cardava in Misamis Oriental
include these parameters as per agreed during the consultative meeting among MLGUs/CLGUs
namely; VSA/: commodity’s soil suitability 50%, area planted 10%, volume of production 10%, number
of farmers 10%, poverty incidence 15% and population 5%. Thus, the ranking of areas will be
determined where the commodity is most suitable to be propagated, and its value chain to be
developed. The acceptable suitable areas suitable for cardava banana are those who have 0.400
indexes.

The result of the EVSA shows that banana is most suitable in the province since the new composite
index is above 0.4000. LGU with new composite index below 0.4000 is only Balingoan.

Table 3.2.5 LGU Ranking base on Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability Analysis (EVSA) of Cardava
Banana in Misamis Oriental

Poverty Area Farmers Volume Old Old New New Geo Code
Municipality Population Incidence Planted Involved Prodn. Composite Rank Composite Rank
Index
BALINGASAG 74,385 20.1 700 600 10,650 0.5924 12 0.70098 1 104302000
GINGOOG CITY 136,698 22.7 750 650 11,537.5 0.4659 25 0.69633 2 104308000
JASAAN 57,055 16.7 750 650 11,537.5 0.5763 14 0.68751 3 104311000
SALAY 29,998 17.3 795 695 12,336.25 0.536 21 0.67955 4 104322000
OPOL 66,327 12.7 500 450 7,986 0.5852 13 0.58308 5 104321000
MAGSAYSAY 36,803 25.8 378 278 4,934.5 0.5736 15 0.57781 6 104317000
ALUBIJID 32,163 14.9 432 332 5,893 0.6539 7 0.57522 7 104301000
LUGAIT 20,559 14.1 385 360 6,390 0.6201 8 0.55158 8 104316000
NAAWAN 22,444 16.7 330 350 5,325 0.603 10 0.54184 9 104320000
MANTICAO 29,469 17.7 355 305 5,400 0.5719 16 0.53195 10 104318000
LAGONGLONG 24,190 18.9 410 310 5,502.5 0.5212 23 0.5201 11 104313000
TALISAYAN 25,761 19.9 312 215 3,763 0.5475 19 0.49956 12 104325000
VILLANUEVA 40,419 16 100 165 1,775 0.6731 5 0.49506 13 104326000
LAGUINDINGAN 26,363 15.2 58 10 142 0.76 1 0.4879 14 104314000
KINOGUITAN 14,091 17.1 300 200 3,550 0.556 17 0.47787 15 104312000
MEDINA 35,612 18.2 290 190 3,372.5 0.5237 22 0.47185 16 104319000
LIBERTAD 12,948 17.9 70 55 710 0.6766 3 0.46959 17 104315000
TAGOLOAN 80,319 16.8 60 10 177.25 0.6582 6 0.46658 18 104324000
INITAO 33,902 17 75 25 440 0.6763 4 0.46599 19 104310000
S.COGON 9,764 17.9 200 250 2,662.05 0.5483 18 0.4645 20 104323000
GITAGUM 17,920 15.8 58 28 497 0.6967 2 0.46212 21 104309000
EL SALVADOR 58,771 13.3 130 95 1,420 0.6188 9 0.44976 22 104307000
CLAVERIA 52,478 22.1 275 25 443.75 0.4747 24 0.42683 23 104306000
BINUANGAN 7,441 17.1 100 60 887.5 0.5429 20 0.40199 24 104304000
BALINGOAN 11,020 18.5 52 25 390.5 0.5212 23 0.3855 25 104303000
Figure 3.2.3 EVSA Map of Banana in Misamis Oriental
3.2.4. Risk Profiling for Banana (Cardava) Commodity

Table No. 3.2.6 Value Chain Segment, Major & Risk Mitigation or Adaptation Measures

Major Risk Risk Mitigation or Adaptation

Value Chain Segment (Climate, Geologic, Pest & Measure
Diseases)
Input Supply/Production Soil degradation reducing the Farmers can adopt soil
fertility of the soil conservation practices, such as
cover cropping, organic
farming, and sustainable soil
Increase in greenhouse gas Sustainable farming practices
emissions such as integrated crop
management, agroforestry, and
conservation tillage
Change in rainfall pattern can Implement water management
lead to water shortages in practices such as rainwater
some areas in the province harvesting, efficient water use
and water recycling
Change in temperature and Implement irrigation systems,
rainfall pattern adjust planting dates and select
banana varieties that are
adopted to the changing
climate
Increase an emergence of pest Banana growers can implement
and disease effective pest and disease
management practices such as
integrated pest management,
crop rotation, and sanitation
measures
Processing/Marketing High level of losses / wastes Provision of machineries /
due to short shelf life and high facilities to reduce losses/
cost of transportation for fresh waste and extend shelf life and
cardava banana provision of appropriate
transport facilities to lessen
/reduce cost of transportation.
 3.2.5 Gap Matrix Banana Value Chain in Misamis Oriental

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Source Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ / 2023 2024 2025 2026\ (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 of Funds
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if Sub Geologic, subproject
program, etc.) applicable MFO Pests & Implementation
Diseases)
INPUT SUPPLY
Access to good Establishment of Plant Tissue Maintained/ Sugbon Sug- Sug- Sug- Farmers Development PLGU Mis. 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA-PRDP/
g-cogon bong- bong- bong- PLGU/ MLGU/
quality disease Laboratory with Grow out Sustained One (1) still and Or./DOST
cogon cogon cogon DOST/ NGA
free planting Nursery and provision of Tissue Laboratory reluctant to implementatio
materials quality planting materials to with grow out nursery use n of voucher
Community Based Nursery established at improved or similar
Sugbongcogon planting schemes and
material. lower cost of
planting
materials.
Financial Support to the one (8)CBN in each Gingoog Me- Bali- Jasa-an Planting Application of DA, DOST, 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
Naawan dina nga-sag Man-
existing and establishment of LGUs with top materials quality PLGU, MLGU
Alu- Salay ticao
Community Base Nursery banana growers bijid
from operation and PG on
(CBN) established standards and Banana Nursery
nurseries quality Operators
Technical assistance in the 6 months training of 2 Gingoog Me- Bali- Jasa-an
do not planting
3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
Naawan dina nga-sag Man-
operation and management of tissue lab operator return materials with
Sugbon Alu- Salay ticao
Tissue Laboratory and and 1 Training of g-cogon bijid Sug- Sug- intended/ regular
Community based nurseries nursery operator Sug- bong- bong- projected monitoring
bong- cogon cogon desirable
co-gon
yields.
Low willingness Provision of Planting Materials 1000 pcs./hectares Gingoog Me- Talisa- Magsay- 12.500 12.500 12.500 12.500
Sugbon dina yan say
among farmers to thru plant now pay later with a total of
g-cogon Salay Bali- Lagong-
invest in good 10,000,000 pcs. Jasaan Alu- nga-sag long
quality planting Alubijid bijid Tagol- Tagolo-
materials Naawan Cla- oan an
veria Opol El Salva-
Lugait Initao dor
Villanue-
va
Documentation and 2 Trainings on GAP Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. Or. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
dissemination of emerging Banana /year & Or. Or.
good practices/GAP Protocol produced 6,000
techno guide on GAP
Banana
 Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Source Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ / (Climate, Measures Other Players for of Funds
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if Sub Geologic, subproject
program, etc.) applicable MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Pests & Implementation 2023 2024 2025 2026
Diseases)
Lack of quality Establishment of facilities for 5 Unit 1 per growth Ginoog Jasa-an Alu- Naawan Farmers Info campaign DA, DOST, 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA/ DOST/
City bijid PLGU/ MLGU/
organic fertilizer organic fertilizer production area would not to promote PLGU, MLGU
NGO
acquire, benefits and and PG on
Technical Trainings of 1 Trainings/year of Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. Or. pay and awareness. Banana Nursery 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ DOST/
Or. Or. apply Enforcement Operators PLGU/ MLGU/
Organic fertilizer operators Fertilizer Operators
NGO
and quality standardization organic of
fertilizer in ordinances/po
their farms. licy to reduce
use of
Lack of Trainings of banana farmers 1 Training /year Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. Or. Farmer’s chemicals DA/ ATI/ PLGU/ 0.500 0.500 0.500 0.500 DA/ ATI/ PLGU/
Or. Or and MLGU
understanding on cost benefits of proper and reluctant MLGU/ Banana
among farmers on efficient use of fertilizer using emissions. Growers
cost benefits of Establishment of demo farm 5 demo site Salay Jasa-an Alu- Naawan organic DA/ ATI/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
proper and bijid fertilizer MLGU/ NGO
showcasing fertilizer MLGU/ Banana
efficient use of management on organic due to slow Growers
fertilizer banana production effect.
Organic Fertilizer suppliers to 1 doctor/growth area Gingoog Jasa-an Alu- Naawan PLGU/ MLGU/ 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 DA/ PLGU/
City bijid MLGU/ NGO
extend technical assistance to Banana
growers /create banana Growers/
doctors Suppliers
Prepare documentation of 5 documentation /1 Gingoog Jasa-an Alu- Naawan DA/ ATI/ PLGU/ 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 DA/ PLGU/
City bijid MLGY
best practices per year MLGU
Low level of Organic Fertilizer 100,000 bags Gingoog Jasa-an Alu- Naawan DA/ PLGU/ 12.500 12.500 12.500 12.500 PLGU/ MLGU/
City bijid NGO
purchasing power Subsidy/Apply now Pay later MLGU/NGO
of smallholders
Inconsistent/ Establishment of a simple 2 Capacity Building Mis. Or. Mis. Additional Information DA, ATI, DTI, 0.500 0.500 ATI/ DA/ PLGU/
Or. MLGU/ NGO
varying quality of quality seal certification of organic fertilizer cost of Campaign on PLGU, MLGU,
organic fertilizer scheme managed and supplier/ providers on production the economic, PG on Organic
available in the operated by farmers quality certification thus, environmental Fertilizer
market association/ cooperative in increase and health Operators
partnership with the LGU price of benefits of
organic using organic
fertilizer. fertilizer and
organic
 Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ / 2023 (Climate, Measures Other Players for Source of
2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if Sub Geologic, Pests subproject Funds
program, etc.) applicable MFO & Diseases) Implementation
PRODUCTION
Skills and know- Gingoog Me- Talisa Mags Continuity of Highlighting of benefits DA, ATI, 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA-PRDP
Sugbong- dina -yan ay-say
how: Established Banana Cluster at 1 cluster area per sporadic farm to be acquired from PLGU, /LGUs/
cogon Salay Bali- Lagon
- To implement least 50 hectares compact municipality of at Jasaan Alu- nga- g-long
locations clustered farm MLGU, PG on NGA
GAP/simple area and provide facilities least 50 hectares/ Alubijid bijid sag Tagol locations and possible Banana
tracking and needed by the PG to became Growth Area Naawan Cla- Tagol- o-an support to the
traceability GAP Certified veria oan El establishment of
system Lugait Opol Salva- access and provision
Initao dor
of materials.
Villan
ue-va
- To minimize Capacity-building of existing Two(2) Capability Mis. Mis. Investments Pair orientation with DA, ATI, 1,000 1,000 DA-PRDP
trainors/ potential community- Building Activities Or. Or. from market matching and PLGU, /LGUs/
incidences of
common/ based providers on Good conducted per year orientation establishing buyer- MLGU, PG on NGA
existing Agricultural Practices (GAP) and capability producer linkages. Banana
diseases- aligned to resources and building will
viruses and learning aptitude of cardava not translate
environmental farmers to banana
stress farm
- On improved Conduct documentation of Conduct annual Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. expansion or 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
best practices and knowledge Search and Market Or. Or. Or. increased
production/ pre-
and post- transfer/ learning and matching 1 / year number of
harvest innovation events such as banana
technologies to best practices competitions/ growers and
increase search outstanding banana processors.
efficiency and farmers
productivity/red Establishment of model farm 1 per Cluster Gingoog Bali- Jasa- Alubi- 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
City nga- an jid
uce post-
sag
harvest losses
Provision of incentives to Educational Tour / Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000
highest producing chemical Cash incentives Or. Or. Or.
free/GAP Certified farms
Production site Construction of Potable Water 3 Site Claveria, Tagol Maintenance Install PG to managed 320,000,
El oan
has insufficient of System of PWS the facility /if manage
Salvador, 200,000
potable water in Alubijid by LGU pass an 550,000
support to ordinance to collect
production area service fees.
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ / 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
 the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if Sub Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
program, etc.) applicable MFO Diseases) Implementation
Lack of technology on Conduct hands on training on proper Hands on Training on Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. ATI/ DA/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 ATI/
banana cardava post-harvest handling Post-Harvest Handling Or. Or. Or. PLGU/ DA/PLGU/
storage Conducted
MLGU/NGO MLGU
Establishment of Trading Post and Trading Post & Bodega Claveria Medi- Alubi- Jasa- DA-PRDP/ 174,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 DA-
Bodega with Hauling Truck Established with Hauling na/ jid an PLGU/MLGU/ PRDP/
Trucks Salay
Banana PLGU/
Association MLGU
PROCESSING AND MARKETING
High level of Establishment of Establishment of Gingoog Salay Jasa- Alubi- Farmers and Emphasis on DA,ATI, DTI, 150,000 150,000 150,000 100,000 DA-PRDP
City an jid
losses / wastes consolidation center and Processing Center other VC players collective or industry DOST, PLGU, /LGUs/
due to short shelf provision of Hauling Facilities and Marketing will not share level marketing shall MLGU and NGA
life and high cost with Village Type Integrated information to be given as back up PG on
of transportation Banana Processing Center maintain by DTI on Banana
for fresh cardava Technical Trainings on 1 training/year and at Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. competitive competitive Processing 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
banana Banana processing and least 3 Processing Or. Or. Or. advantage marketing strategy Operators
appropriate packaging and Center BFAD (individualistic
Orientation for BFAD accredited mind-set)
certification
Facilitate linkages with Conduct market Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. Players Incremental build-up DA,DTI, 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ DTI/
banana chips exporters and linkages at least 1 Or. Or. Or. especially of relationships PLGU, MLGU PLGU
importers (Chinese importers times /year farmers not using both formal and PG on
buy first fry chips); promote willing to forge and informal Banana
long term contractual longer term mechanisms
commitment contractual
Conduct information 1 forum/year Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. agreement 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
exchange forum among first Or. Or. Or.
fry facilities
Lack of product Conduct training on proper 1 per year Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Mis. DA, DTI, ATI, 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ DTI/
differentiation/ product packaging and quality Or. Or. Or. PLGU, MLGU PLGU
available product product standardization and PG on
formats Banana
Low demand of Conduct Agri-fair and free 1 / year Provin Provin- Provi Provi Processing 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000
-cial cial n-cial n-cial Operators
banana chips in product testing with various
local market variants
 Key Gap/ Constraint in VC Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Source Rank
Development in the Province Intervention (subprojects: including # of farmers/ / 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 of Funds
enterprise or infrastructure, fisherfolk reached, if Sub Geologic, Pests subproject
business enabling program, applicable MFO & Diseases) Implementation
etc.)
Dominance of spot Capability building on One (1) capability Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. Farmers and Capability building DA/ DTI/ ATI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
Or. Or. Or. Or.
transactions medium-term and long- building activity farmer groups will be PLGU/ MLGU MLGU/ NGO
term contract conducted per year will not complemented with
agreements engage in linking producers
 Conduct market One (1) per year Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Or. Or. Or. Or.
matching
. Lack of access to Improve capacity Encourage Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. DA/ATI 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ATI
Or. Or. Or. Or.
skills and resources to (training/seminar/worksh growers/processors PLGU / PLGU /
comply with good op) of enterprises to for HACCP/good MLGU MLGU
manufacturing comply with agricultural practices
practices (GMP), GMP/HACCP and (GAP)/GMP/interna-
hazard analysis and sustainable production tional standards
critical control points practices. organization (ISO)
hazard analysis and and Organic
critical control points Agriculture Standard
(HACCP) and for certification
sustainable production (OASC)
practices (especially
on micro enterprise
Set-up of GMP/HACCP Establishment of Ging- Jasa-an Manti- Bali- DA-PRDP/ 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 DA-PRDP/
oog cao nga-sag
compliant processing facility
GMP/ HACCP DOST/ DTI/ DOST/ DTI/
City
Compliant PLGU/MLGU/ PLGU/MLGU/
Processing facility Banana Banana
Association Association
Conduct Trainings Trainings
to to Banana Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. DA/ ATI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/
Or. Or. Or. Or.
Banana growers/ processors
growers/ processors DOST/ DTI/ DOST/ DTI/
on HACCP/ GAP/GMP/ISO on HACCP/ PLGU/ PLGU/ MLGU
and OASC certification GAP/GMP/ISO and MLGU/
OASC Banana
Growers
Government to facilitate Linkage of Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. DA/ ATI/ DTI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/ DTI/
Or. Or. Or. Or.
linkage of cooperatives cooperatives to DOST/ PLGU/ DOST/ PLGU/
to agencies currently agencies currently MLGU / MLGU /
engaged in banana engaged in banana Banana Banana
processing processing facilitated Growers Growers
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Source Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ / 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 of Funds
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if Sub Geologic, Pests subproject
program, etc.) applicable MFO & Diseases) Implementation
Absence of price Link farmers to buyers Farmers to buyers Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. DA/ DTI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ DTI/
Or. Or. Or. Or.
support to linked DOST/ PLGU/ DOST/ PLGU/
farmers MLGU MLGU
unstable market Tie up marketing to suppliers Conduct market Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Or. Or. Or. Or.
price of banana matching
Trainings and hands on value Trainings and hands Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. DA/ ATI/ DTI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/ DTI/
Or. Or. Or. Or.
adding commodities to on value adding DOST/ PLGU/ DOST/ PLGU/
 beneficiaries commodities to MLGU MLGU
beneficiaries
provided
INTERFIRM RELATIONSHIP/VCGOVERNANCE
Weak capacity of Capability building/Orientation One (1) capability . Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. Farmers and Technical Support DA/ ATI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/
Or. Or. Or. Or.
farmers to on cooperative/association building/orientation farmer groups group and lead PLGU/ PLGU/
organize formation and development activity conducted in unwilling to organizations to MLGU/CDA MLGU/
themselves into and technical assistance on clusters with no formally emphasize benefits CDA
structured groups the submission of existing organized organize of collective
requirements to pertinent groups or with high themselves bargaining and
government agencies number of new meeting the
banana farmers required volume of
Development of capacity of 80% of existing and Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. big buyers 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Or. Or. Or. Or.
farmers to incrementally new farmers
associate, collaborate, organized into
andcoordinate to achieve cooperatives/
economies of scale in their associations
transactions and to become
attractive partners to buyers
Vertical Establish Formal agreement Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. DA/ ATI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/
Or. Or. Or. Or.
Relationship /Cooperate/Collaborate with between farmer DOST/ DTI/ DOST/
prospective funding associations/ PLGU/ DTI/
institutions for technical and cooperatives MLGU/ PLGU/
financial assistance. established/ Banana MLGU
executed Growers
Research & Development
Pest and Disease Continuing research and Pests and diseases Ging- Salay Jasa-an Initao DA/ ATI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/
oog
Prevention development on Pest and management forum DOST/ PLGU/ DOST/
City
disease prevention conducted MLGU PLGU/
MLGU
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if MFO Geologic, Pests subproject Funds
program, etc.) applicable & Diseases) Implementation
DA/ ATI/ DA/ ATI/
Strengthen Research and R and D forum Manti- Opol Bali- Mag- DOST/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DOST/
cao nga-sag saysay MLGU PLGU/
Development on production, conducted
post -harvest and MLGU
The LGU is not Capacitate AEW’s in the Conduct of training of Mis. Mis. Mis. Mis. 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Or. Or. Or. Or.
capacitated in conduct of R and D in Banana trainings for R and D.
conducting R and
D in Banana
Commodity.
Limited outreach Provide/hire banana specialist Banana Expert/ Ging- Magsay DA/ ATI/ 2,000 2,200 DA/ ATI/
oog say,
of existing extension workers Specialize developed DOST/ PLGU/ DOST/
City, Sugbon
extension Medi- gcogon
MLGU PLGU/
services na, , MLGU
Salay Claver-
Lagon ia,
glong,
Opol, El
Bali-
Salvado
nga-
r,
sag,
Jasa- Initao,
an, Naawa
Alu- n,
bijid, Mantic
Talisa ao,
yan Lugait
POLICY
Limited access to Linkage with financial Services of financial All All Mis. All Mis. All Mis.
Mis. Or. Or. Or.
financial services institutions (government and institutions extended
Or. bana- bana- bana-
private institutions to increase to farmer bana- na na na
and sustain potential associations/ na areas areas areas
plantation areas especially in cooperatives areas
times of calamities
Registered All banana farmers must be All All Mis. All Mis. All Mis.
Mis. Or. Or. Or.
farmers in registered to RSBSA
Or. bana- bana- bana-
RSBSA bana- na na na
na areas areas areas
areas

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
program, etc.) applicable Diseases) Implementation
Poor Farm to Upgrading of access of farm Concreted/ Road Ordinance on tool DA-PRDP / DA-PRDP
Market Roads to market roads andother rehabilitated/ Maintenance fees PLGU / / PLGU /
results to high infra projects in constructed FMR MLGU MLGU
transportation municipalities and cities and/or bridge and
costs and limited where cardaba banana as other infrastructure
access to their major commodity projects :
products and produce or access from
support market banana cardaba farms to Upgrading/
2.00 54,000
Concreting of Oguis-
km
Bandrera FMR, Initao
Upgrading of
3.02 81,540
Gimampang-Aluna-
km
Casilihon FMR- Initao
Upgrading/Concreting
6 km 162,000
of Cogon-Lulang FMR,
Initao
Upgrading of Sapong- 5.51
km 148,770
Mamiguis-Bansilang
FMR-Initao
Upgrading /Concreting 6 Km 162,000
of Cogon-Lulang FMR,
Initao
Upgrading/ Concreting 7 km 189,000
of Sinalac-Lulang
FMR, Initao
Upgrading /Concreting 3 km 84,000
of Calacapan
Calanyugan-Kimalok
FMR, Initao
Upgrading/Concreting 3 km 84,000
of Cogon Tawan-
tawan – Aluna FMR,
Initao
Concreting of Mimbule 1.80 36,000
to Saray FMR-Salay km
Concreting of Saray- 10 km 200,000
Mimbalite-Matampa
FMR, Salay
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
program, etc.) applicable Diseases) Implementation
Concreting of Looc- 3.000 90,000
Tinagaan FMR, Salay km
Construction of 4 0.75 25,000
Barrels Box Cluvert, at Km
Salay River II, Salay
Concreting of Looc- 3.000 90,000
Tinagaan FMR- Salay km
 Concreting of 4.000 120,000
Alipuaton-Bunal FMR- km
Salay
Upgrading of Sumalag- 2.11 65,000
Calubo Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Salicapan- 2.9 km 78,300
Suarez FMR-Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Panabol- 1.34 36,180
Buko FMR-Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.726 46,602
Poblacion FMR, km
Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.16 31,320
Kitotok FMR, Kinoguitan
Concreting of Sitio 12.3 246,000
Bangbang, Brgy. Buko- km
Suarez FMR-Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Puga-an- 1.8 km 48,600
Bitaugon FMR,
Libertad
Concreting of Sitio 4 km 320,000
Bato, Brgy kimaya-
Villanueva
Upgrading of
3.7454 101,126
Dawayan-Lokong-
km
Crossing Mambuaya
FMR, Villanueva

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
program, etc.) applicable Diseases) Implementation
Construction of FMR 0.61 85,000
with slope Protection km
and sheet piles (300
meters long) in Sitio
Macusi, Brgy.
Kimaya, Villanueva
Upgrading of Madrid- 1.628 43,956
km
 Lapad Road,
Laguindingan
Upgrading of Lapad – 2.985 80,595
Sikiton Road-Lourdes km
Brgy. Road,
Laguindingan
Upgrading of Lapad- 0.5 km 13,500
Aromahon-Nob
Road, Lapad,
Laguindingan
Salcedo Hills Drive 1 km 27,000
Road, Pob.
Laguindingan
SitioEba Road, 1 km 27,000
Laguindingan
Spring Road, 0.79 21,330
Laguindingan km
Tangke Road, Pob. 0.44 11,880
Laguindingan km
Kibaghot Spring 0.98 26,460
Road, Pob. km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot -Alongan 1.3 km 35,100
Road, Kibaghot,
Laguindingan
Gasi-Pagangon 3.00 81,000
Road, Gasi, km
Laguindingan
Gasi-Clarin Road, 2.80 75,600
Gasi, Laguindingan km

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
program, etc.) applicable Diseases) Implementation
Gasi- Pitogo Road, 0.96 25,920
Gasi, Laguindingan km
Gasi-Sinai Road, 0.60 16,000
Gasi, Laguindingan km
Gasi-Pipian- 1.20 32,000
km
 Pagangon Road,
Gasi, Laguindingan
Sinai-Gasi Road with 1.5 km 40,500
Bridge, Sinai,
Laguindingan
Sinai-Aput Road, 1.5 km 40,500
Sinai, Laguindingan
Sambulawan-Bajuyo 2.5 km 67,500
Road, Sambulawan,
Laguindingan
JKT. National 2 km 54,000
Highway to Virgin as
Fatima Road,
Sambulawan,
Laguindingan
Sambulawan Tambo 1.472 39,744
Road, Sambulawan, km
Laguindingan
Liberty Pitogo Road, 1.25 33,750
Liberty, Laguindingan km
Liberty Gasi Road, 3 km 81,000
Liberty, Laguindingan
Liberty Kibaghot 1.37 36,990
Road, Laguindingan km
Liberty Anosa-Liberty 3km 81,000
Elem. Sch. Road,
Laguindingan
Liberty Campo Road, 3.15 85,050
Laguindingan km

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Propose Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: enterprise including # of farmers/ Sub (Climate, Measures Other Players for d
the Province or infrastructure, business enabling fisherfolk reached, if MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Source
program, etc.) applicable 2023 2024 2025 2026 Diseases Implementation 2023 2024 2025 2026 of
Funds
MauswagonClarin 1 km 27,000
Road, Laguindingan
Mauswagon-Rajal 1km 27,000
Road, Laguindingan
Concreting of 1.4 km 37,800
 Aromahon, Lapad
Road, Laguindingan
Concreting of 1.9 km 51,300
Aromahon-Tiano
Road, Laguindingan
Sambulawan Tambo 1.472 39,744
Road, Sambulawan, km
Laguindingan
Concreting of 4 km 320,000
Cebukawon FMR,
Tagoloan
Concreting of 2 km 54,000
Nasalaban –Subaya
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of 4 km 120,000
Natumolan-Maribojoc
FMR, Tagolan
Rehabilitation of 3 km 90,000
Rosario FMR,
Tagoloan
Concreting of Danao 5 km 150,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of 2.2 km 176,000
Rosario –
Comocomo FMR,
Tagoloan
Lacapon-Tugasnon 5.62 168,600
Sitio Bato (Hot km
Spring) Seriwagan
Sungay Road ,
Alubijid

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, including MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: # of farmers/ fisherfolk reached, if Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province enterprise or infrastructure, applicable MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) Diseases Implementation
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) 10km MLGUs, PLGU, 300,000 PLGU, DA,
Tugasnon-San Francisco El DA, PRDP PRDP
Salvador
Concreting of Kalongonan- 10 km 300,000
 Kandal FMR, El Salvador
Construction of Tibon-Tibon- 15 km 580,,000
Cabalawan-Mindulao-Tama
FMR with Bridge, Magsaysay
Construction of Cabantian – 10 km 270,000
Tulang-Kauswagan
Damayuhan Road ,
Magsaysay
Construction of Kandiis-Tibon- 6.000 162,000
Tibon Road, Magsaysay km
Construction of Bonifacio – 7km 189,000
Mindulao Road, Magsaysay

Construction of Mahayahay – 11.530 311,001

Katipunan-Gumabon-Tama km
Road, Magsaysay
Concreting of Kibungsod – 2 km 54,000
Cabantian Circuferencial
Road, Magsaysay
Construction of Artadi-San 5 km 150,000
Vicente FMR, Magsaysay
Construction of Kibungsod- 4 km 120,000
Cabubuhan –Villa Felipa FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Consuelo- 7 km 189,000
Abunda-Tinaan FMR,
Magsaysay
Construction of Consuelo 6 km 162,000
(Kimaya) Pag-asa FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Cabubuhan 2.5 km 67,500
(Lilo) Kibungsod FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of FMR Along 3 km 90,000
Purok 5-A & Purok 5-B of
Brgy. Pagawan, Manticao
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, including MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: # of farmers/ fisherfolk reached, if Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province enterprise or infrastructure, applicable MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) Diseases Implementation
Concreting of FMR at Sitio 4 km 120,000
Donque, Upper Malibog,
Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 5 km 150,000
Barangay Balintad,
 Manticao
Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 54,000
Sambuyaan Road, km
Manticao
Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km 97,200
Kolambugan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao
Concreting PanianganBrgy. 0.70 18,900
Road, Manticao km
Concreting TuodPurok 7 , 0.50 13,500
Manticao km
Concreting of Balintad – 1.5 km 40,000
Victory Road, Manticao
Concreting of Magpait – 2.50 67,500
Camanga Road, Manticao km
Concreting of Tuod- 3.00 81,000
Pagangon Road, Manticao km
Concreting of Mahayahay – 3.00 81,000
Kilablab, Manticao km
Concreting of Mahayahay – 3.00 81,000
Limonda, Manticao km
Concreting of Donque Hill, 3.00 81,000
Manticao km
Concreting of Bagares St., 0.50 13,500
Manticao km
Concreting of Sabuero St., 0.30 8,100
Manticao km
Concreting of Cementery 0.30 8,100
Road, Manticao km

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, including MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: # of farmers/ fisherfolk reached, if Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province enterprise or infrastructure, applicable MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) Diseases Implementation
Concreting of Mahayag- 3.50 94,500
Digkilaan, Manticao km
Concreting of Sagyawan – 3.00 81,000
Malibato, Manticao km
 Upgrading of Domagooc to 4.000 108,000
SitioPatrocenio FMR, km.
Jasaan
Upgrading of Solana to 3.000 81,000
Sitio Looc FMR, Jasaan km.
Upgrading of SitioKatu-an, 5.000 135,000
Natubo – Kimamaon km.
Kimaya FMR, Jasaan
Upgrading of San Antonio 6.000 162,000
to Sitio Cogon FMR, km.
Jasaan
Concreting of San Nicolas- 16 km 432,000
Upper Antonio-IS-Cruz
Road, Jasaan
Concreting of Mananum 6.5 km 174,000
Daan-Kabol-Kabol FMR
with Bridge, Medina
Bulwa – Mananum Bag-o 3.000 81,000
FMR, Medina km
Pahindong–Macopa FMR, 3.000 81,000
Medina km
Tupon- Maanyag FMR, 3.000 81,000
Medina km
San Vicente – Kiiwang, 3 km 81,000
Medina
San Vicente – Sidlakan, 2 km 54,000
Medina
Bangbang Sidlakan, 3 km 81,000
Medina
San Jose – Hollywood, 4 km 108,000
Medina
Mananum Bag-o – Baluarte 3 km 81,000
FMR, Medina
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, including MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: # of farmers/ fisherfolk reached, if Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province enterprise or infrastructure, applicable MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
business enabling program, etc.) Diseases Implementation
Portulin – Dig-aguyan FMR, 3 km 81,000
Medina
Gasa – Hangaron FMR, 3 km 81,000
Medina
San Roque FRM, Medina 3 km 81,000
 Maanas – San Vicente FMR, 3 km 81,000
Medina
San Isidro – Labas Pagsama 3 km 81,000
FMR, Medina
Mimbolo – Natugod FMR, 3 km 81,000
Medina
Road Concreting at Upper 7 km 189,000
Malibud to Dinawehan
FMR, Gingoog City
Road Concreting Crossing 4 km 108,000
San Miguel to Kalagonoy
FMR, Gingoog City
Concreting of Lugait- 34.390 928,530
Talacogon- Aya-aya- km.
Betahon-Camanga-
Argayoso-Cabalantian-
Balintad-Lubilan-Tula Road
Concreting of Poblacion 17.190 464,130
Laguindingan-Lapad- km.
Lourdes-Taparak-Sungay-
Tugasnon Road
Concreting of Poblacion- 6.000 165,000
San Isidro, Jasaan Road, km.
Jasaan
Concreting of Gingoog to 70.910 1,914,5
70
Claveria National Road, km.
Gingoog & Claveria
Concreting of Maanas- 8.600 232,200
Kibuguing Road, Medina & km.
Gingoog City
Concreting of Kabug- 7.000 189,000
Sidlakan Road, Medina & km.
Gingoog City
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, including # MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: of farmers/ fisherfolk reached, if Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province enterprise or infrastructure, applicable MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
business enabling program, Diseases Implementation
etc.)
Concreting of San Luis – 5.500 148,500
Kibuging Road, Gingoog City km.
Concreting of Talisay- 4.000 108,000
Mahayahay Road, Gingoog km.
 City & Magsaysay
Concreting of Katipunan- 4.000 108,000
Gumabon Road, Magsaysay km.
Concreting of Pob. -Apas- 19.360 522,720
Kamelon-Sinalac-Tula- km.
Sungay Road, Initao &
Alubijid
Concreting of Poblacion- 21.66 584,820
Patag-Lubilan-Sungay Road, km.
Manticao & Alubijid
Concreting of Bugdang FMR, 2 km 54,000
Talisayan
Concreting of Minlimaw- 5 km 135,000
Mahayag FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,000
Mandahilag-Macopa FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Poblacion – 2 km 54,000
Sindangan FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Pook-Sibantang 7 km 189,000
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of San Jose – 6 km 162,000
Bugdang –Mahayag FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Mintabon – 5 km 135,000
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Pangpangon- 10 km 240,000
Putting Balas-Sibantang-
Mahayag FMR, Talisayan

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, including # MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adaption Proposed Lead & Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: of farmers/ fisherfolk reached, if Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Measures Other Players for 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province enterprise or infrastructure, applicable MFO Geologic, Pests & subproject Funds
business enabling program, Diseases Implementation
etc.)
Concreting and 3 km 100,000
Rehabilitation of FMR of
 Kitamban – Valdeconcha –
Mosangot Road, Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1 km 30,000
Valdeconcha-Silad-
Ampianga FMR, Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1km 30,000
Kitambis – Kidalayon-
Membuahan FMR,
Binuangan
Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000
(Kumakaykay-
Valdechoncha-Kitamban),
Binuangan
Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000
(Gantangun-Kitambis),
Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini – 1km 30,000
Tinagaan Road, Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini- 1km 30,000
Tinigaan Road, Binuangan
Concreting of Mananum- 1.6 km 43,961
Claveria FMR with Bridge,
Balingasag
Concreting of Kibalua FMR, 4.3 km 116,500
Balingasag
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 km 125,500
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad
FMR, Balingasag

Key Gap/ Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, including # of MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Proposed Lead & Other Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Intervention (subprojects: enterprise farmers/ fisherfolk reached, if applicable Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Adaption Players for subproject 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in or infrastructure, business enabling MFO Geologic, Pests & Measures Implementation Funds
the Province program, etc.) Diseases
Tuboran to Aluna FMR, Naawan 1.5 km MLGUs, PLGU, DA, PRDP 45,000 MLGUs,
PLGU, DA,
PRDP
 Bangcalon to Tuboran FMR, 2.5 km 75,000
Naawan
Linangkayan Highway to Don Pedro 4 km 120,000
FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Poblacion to Patag 7 km 210,000
FMR, Naawan
Mat-I Linugos to Tagbalogo FMR, 6 km 180,000
Naawan
Don Pedro to Digcamara FMR, 3 km 90,000
Naawan
Lapad to Tuboran Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Purok 3 Mapulog to Tagbalogo 3 km 90,000
FMR, Naawan
Digcamara Mapulog to Cabilin 2 km 60,000
Road, Naawan
Mapulog P2 to Banatihon Road, 5.5 km 160,000
Naawan
Concreting of Mapulog –Tuboran 4 km 92,400
FMR with Arc bridges component,
Naawan
Concreting of Suwa-Bangko Lubilan 4.58 137,400
FMR, Naawan km
Concreting of Mat-I Lubilan FMR, 8.27 165,400
Naawan km
Lubilan to Mambuntan Road, 3 km 90,000
Naawan
Lubilan to Mahanggub Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Tagbalogo P8 to Pasagdihon FMR, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Mat-I to Pasagdihon FMR, Naawan 3 km 90,000
Centro Don Pedro to Macawa Road, 2.309 60,500
Naawan km
Don Pedro to Linangkayan FMR, 2 km 60,000
Naawan

Key Gap/ Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, including # of MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Proposed Lead & Other Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Intervention (subprojects: enterprise farmers/ fisherfolk reached, if applicable Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate, Adaption Players for subproject 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in or infrastructure, business enabling MFO Geologic, Pests & Measures Implementation Funds
the Province program, etc.) Diseases
Mapulog P6 to P8 FMR, 5 KM 150,000
Naawan
Maputi P8 to P12 FMR, Naawan 4 km 120,000
Maputi to Tuboran, Naawan 4 km 120,000
Concerting of Pavement Road 700 8,700
(Purok4) to Existing Concrete meter
Pavement (Purok 6) Poblacion,
Gitagum
Construction/ Concreting of FMR 800 7,600
P34 Talao- to C.P. Garcia, meter
Gitagum
Upgrading/Concreting Awang 5.985 179,550
Road at Brgy. Awang, Opol
Upgrading/Concreting Giangkan 2.655 79,650
Road at Brgy. Awang, Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting 6.020 180,600
Camingawan – Lala Oro
Tapurok Road, Patag &
Malanang, Opol
Upgrading /Concreting 2.680 80,000
Binigwayan-Mala Oro Road,
Patag & Malanang, Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting Tulahon- 0.615 18,450
Camaroc Road, Malanang, Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting Megdaha 3.875 116,250
Road, Tingalan, Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting Old 1.780 53,400
Tingalan Road, Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting 3.81 114,300
Tingkulan Road, Bagocboc,
Opol
III. PRIORITY COMMODITY CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

3.3 Commodity Value Chain 3: Cassava Granules

3.3 PRIORITY COMMODITY PROFILE OF CASSAVA

3.3.1 COMMODITY PROFILE

"Manihot esculenta" or "cassava" is a woody shrub of the Euphorbiaceae family that is native to South America.
Cassava is locally known as “kamoteng-kahoy” or “balanghoy”. The edible starchy tuberous root of cassava is
consumed worldwide. It is presently grown as an annual crop in subtropical and tropical regions of the world.
Cassava is an important food source in the tropics and provides the third-highest carbohydrate yield among the crop
plants. It is a perennial plant that makes it easy to harvest the crop when required and treat it as a food reserve
during droughts and famines thus it serves as both a cash and subsistence crop.
Cassava, which is also known as manioc, yuca, balinghoy, mogo, mandioca, kamotengkahoy, is a perennial,
woody shrub that grows between one to four meters in height. The root can grow up to 15cm in diameter and reach
120 cm in length to weigh between one and eight kilograms. The roots of a 1-1.5 year-old cassava plant have a
starch content between 20% and 32%, which is high compared to other starch food crops. Cassava is an excellent
source of carbohydrates but an inferior source of protein, fat and vitamins.

Cassava has a strong economic relationship with resource-constrained farmers situated in forest margins and
marginal lands. The crop can be grown under marginal conditions where few other crops could survive. It is
relatively tolerant of poor soil and seasonal drought and has an unrivalled ability to recover from damage by pests
and diseases. The crop offers the convenient flexibility that it can be harvested when the farmers need it. It can be
left in the ground for 7 months to 2 years after planting and then harvested as needed. These characteristics make
this crop a fundamental food and income security in marginal agricultural lands. Hence, any development in
cassava will have an implication on food security, poverty alleviation, and on the protection and utilization of
marginal lands in the Philippines that at present contribute very little to agriculture.

The cassava plant contains a root and leaves, which can both be processed to make various products. The leaves
are good substitutes and supplement to commercial feeds while the damaged roots and skin can also be used as
animal feeds. More products, however, can be made from the roots than the leaves. Products from cassava’s roots
have greater value as these require more complex value added activities. The roots need to be processed to reduce
the cyanide content to safe levels before consumption. Once harvested, cassava tubers begin to deteriorate and
cannot be stored for more than a few days. They are bulky with about 70% moisture content which makes
transportation of the tubers to urban markets difficult and expensive. Thus, there is a need for rapid processing of
the tubers (before spoilage sets in) into various products with increased shelf life.

Cassava is acquiring an increased role in rural development as raw material for many industrial applications. The
most important industrial uses of cassava are as source of energy in animal diets in the feed industry, for the starch
industry, and more recently for the production of ethanol.

The commodity value chain map describe the process flow, the horizontal and vertical integration of the commodity
(Cassava) starting from the various players in the agriculture and trade sector advancing the development of the
farmers thru the utilization of technology and sustainable market access. It started from input provision to final sales.

Each player /operators has definite function in the development of the industry. In the input segments provision of
quality planting materials, organic fertilizer, insecticides, pesticides can be handle by agri suppliers, Municipal
Agriculture Office and Cassava Growers supplier of quality planting materials, Agricultural Extension Workers will
provide the technical assistance Financial Institution will provide funding/ capital for cassava production. For
Production segment, Transformation /processing and distribution is mainly taken care of by cassava growers and
traders, assemblers /consolidators. Final sales are users of cassava.
 Figure 3.3.1 Value Chain Map Cassava

Source: VCA of Cassava

COMMODITY SITUATION

In 2012 about 103 countries produced cassava with a production of 262,585,741 Mt. and 57% coming from the
global production of cassava in 2020 is 130.01 million metric tons. Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, and
Thailand are the top cassava producing countries worldwide with 20.26, 13.85, and 9.79 percent production
respectively (www.tridge.com). The Philippines has less than one (1) percent contribution to the global production of
cassava (FAO Stat). In 2021 Mindanao Island has 78 percent contribution to the Philippine’s cassava production
and was dominated by the BARMM with around 43 percent or (1,094,811.14 MT) production followed by Northern
Mindanao with 26 percent (675,887.72 MT) production. Of the 26 percent, Misamis Oriental shared 25 percent
(166,269.95 MT) of Northern Mindanao’s cassava production which is higher than the other regions
(openstat.psa.gov.ph). Figure 3.3.2 illustrates the Mindanao production of cassava by region.

Figure 3.3.2 CASSAVA PRODUCTION IN MINDANAO BY REGION

Table 3.3.1 shows the area harvested for cassava of the country from 2017 to 2022 was decreasing. The factor that
affects the decrease was the conversion of cassava area to other uses/ crops. Other factor is unstable buying price
of cassava tubers / granules. More so that during peak harvest big buyers declared stop buying. While for Misamis
Oriental area harvested from 2018 to 2021 was decreasing and slightly increase in 2022.

Table 3.3.1 Area Harvested of Cassava (Hectares)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

National 234,539.57 227,643.73 222,441.49 219,232.12 216,113.01
Northern Mindanao 28,606.60 27,621.32 26,884.41 27,544.04 27,438.32
Misamis Oriental 6,510.00 6,240.00 6,230.40 6,216.92 6,250.00
 The top five (5) cassava producer of the world was Negeria, Indonesia, Brazel, Thailand and Dominican Republic of
Congo. Philippines ranked 25th producers of cassava in the world with a production volume of 2,559,811.90 Mt. in
2022 and Northern Mindanao accounted 90% of the Mindanao producing Region. Misamis Oriental shared, 7% of the
country’s production and 25% of Northern Mindanao cassava production. Production performance of cassava in the
province was from 2018 to 2021 was decreasing because area planted/harvested was decreasing and average yield
was also decreasing. The performance was brought about by change of crops to other crops such as tobacco and
plantation crops, land ownership and lack of improved quality variety.

Table 3.3.2 Volume of Production of Cassava (MT)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

National 2,806,667.80 2,723,032.59 2,630,800.28 2,607,758.63 2,559,811.90
Northern Mindanao 736,545.61 716,913.80 686,774.64 675,887.72 682,699.09
Misamis Oriental 184,172.00 170,242.00 168,555.28 157,304.71 166,269.95

Average production of the country has up and down trend. While Northern Mindanao average production posted much
higher than the country’s average production by 200%. Average production of Northern Mindanao decreases in 2020
because of “Pandemic”. It continuously decreases from 2021 to 2022. The extent of access to resources and
technology and its adoption appear to have a significant effect on farm productivity. Average yield of fresh tubers per
hectare among farmers with limited access to resources and technology ranges from 10 to 15 tons per hectare
compared to the 40 to 60 tons per hectare among those with access to resources and technology. A major
characteristic of the farmers with access to technology and resources is the adoption of improved technology and
varieties of cassava for planting. Misamis Oriental posted 26.60 Mt./ha. which was higher than 26.6% from 2021. The
increased was brought about by provision of loans to cassava farmers. Average yield of Misamis Oriental is much
higher than the country’s and Northern Mindanao average yield.

Table 3.3.3 Average Yield of Cassava (MT/Ha.)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

National 11.97 11.96 11.82 11.89 11.84
Northern Mindanao 25.75 25.95 25.59 24.93 24.63
Misamis Oriental 28.29 27.28 27.05 25.30 26.60

Dried cassava chips are sold to feed milling companies as ingredient in the production of livestock feeds. It is
estimated that about 90% of fresh tuber production in Misamis Oriental are utilized for feed production and 10% for
food.

San Miguel Foods, Inc. (SMFI) and Dysang is the biggest feed milling capacity and major cassava buyers in Mindanao
including Misamis Oriental. Its feed milling operation produces several types of animal feeds under the brand name B-
Meg. Based on our MIS report biggest buyer of cassava in Cagayan de Oro is DBA-Traders and Cassava Integrators at
Alubijid, Villanueva, Initao, Balingoan, Salay, Lagonglong, Kinoguitan, Sugbongcogon, Medina, Balingasag and
Talisayan.

The existing area planted to cassava was 6,250 hectares, while, the potential expansion area is 5,400 hectares. The
biggest producing cassava is Claveria with 1,2550 hectares and the lowest producing cassava is Gitagum and Libertad
with 10 hectares. While there LGUs who have not engage in cassava namely Opol, Initao, Naawan, Manticao and
Lugait. The province posted an average production of 25.63 Mt./Ha., which higher than Northern Mindanao and the
Country. The elements that brought about the higher yield were the used of high yielding varieties and the presence of
technical assistance from DA, LGUs, ready buyers and strong cassava cooperative/ association.

Table 3.3.4 Existing and Expansion Area, Production Performance of Cassava per Municipality/ City in
Misamis Oriental CY2022

Municipality Population Poverty Existing Expansion Area

Incidence Area Planted No. of Area Production (Ha.)
(Has) farmers Harvested (Mt.)
(Ha)
Magsaysay 36,803 25.8 100 100 100 2,660.00 350

Gingoog City 136,698 22.7 750 750 750 19,950.00 1,075

Medina 35,612 18.2 35 35 35 931.00 250

Talisayan 25,761 19.9 125 125 125 3,325.00 150

Balingoan 11,020 18.5 1,337 1,337 1337 35,564.20 500

Kinoguitan 14,091 17.1 550 550 550 14,630.00 100

Sugbongcogon 9,764 17.9 250 250 250 6,650.00 160

Binuangan 7,441 17.1 20 20 20 532.00 100

Salay 29,998 17.3 350 350 350 9,310.00 300

Lagonglong 24,190 18.9 80 80 80 2,128.00 100

Balingasag 74,385 20.1 650 650 650 17,290.00 300

Jasaan 57,055 16.7 125 125 125 3,325.00 600

Villanueva 40,419 16.0 90 90 90 2,394.00 240

Claveria 52,478 22.1 1,550 1,550 1,550 41,230.00 785

Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 40 40 40 1,064.00 120

Opol 66,327 12.7

El Salvador 58,771 13.3 50 50 50 1,330.00 100

 Alubijid 32,163 14.9 98 98 98 2,626.75 100

Laguindingan 26,363 15.2 30 30 30 798.00 30

Gitagum 17,920 15.8 10 10 10 266.00

Libertad 12,948 17.9 10 10 10 266.00 40

Initao 33,902 17.0

Municipality Population Poverty Existing Expansion Area

Incidence Area Planted No. of Area Production (Ha.)
(Has) farmers Harvested (Mt.)
(Ha)
Naawan 22,444 16.7

Manticao 29,469 17.7

Lugait 20,559 14.1

Misamis Oriental 957,900 21.4 6,250 6,250 6,250 166,269.95 5,400.00

Source: LGUs MIS

Figure 3.3.3 Commodity Map of Cassava in Misamis Oriental

 3.3.2 Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability Assessment (EVSA) of Cassava in Misamis Oriental

The expanded vulnerability and suitability Assessment (EVSA) is a tool used in determining the suitability of a
commodity in an area. During the consultative workshop updating of PCIP in the province the body agreed the
following parameter to be used in the computation of EVSA for cassava, 50% soil suitability, 10 % production, 10%
area planted, 10% no. of farmers engaged in cassava, 15% poverty incidence and 5% population. Areas suitable for
cassava production are those which have a new composite index of 0.4000. The result of EVSA computation is
reflected in Table 3.3.5, the top 5 LGUs/ CLUs suitable for cassava production are the following, Claveria,
Balingoan, Gingoog City, Balingasag and Laguindingan. The municipalities / Cities with new composite index
below 0.4000 are Medina, Lagonglong, Opol, Binuangan, Lugait, Naawan and Manticao.

Table 3.3.5 EVSA Result of Cassava in Misamis Oriental

Municipality Population Poverty Area No. of Production Old Old New New Geo Code
Incidence Planted Farmer Composite Rank Composite Rank
Index Index
CLAVERIA 52,478 22.1 2,225 1,550 41,230 0.4686 25 0.68199 1 104306000
BALINGOAN 11,020 18.5 1,837 1,337 35,564.2 0.4818 24 0.60757 2 104303000
GINGOOG CITY 136,698 22.7 1,825 750 19,950 0.4529 26 0.58723 3 104308000
BALINGASAG 74,385 20.1 950 650 17,290 0.5854 11 0.56335 4 104302000
LAGUINDINGAN 26,363 15.2 60 30 798 0.7593 1 0.48424 5 104314000
TAGOLOAN 80,319 16.8 160 40 1,064 0.6852 3 0.482 6 104324000
MAGSAYSAY 36,803 25.8 450 100 2,660 0.5471 14 0.47014 7 104317000
KINOGUITAN 14,091 17.1 650 550 14,630 0.5145 19 0.46199 8 104312000
VILLANUEVA 40,419 16 330 90 2,394 0.648 6 0.45825 9 104326000
GITAGUM 17,920 15.8 10 10 266 0.694 2 0.44716 10 104309000
INITAO 33,902 17 0 0 0 0.6641 4 0.44329 11 104310000
LIBERTAD 12,948 17.9 50 10 266 0.6573 5 0.44101 12 104315000
SALAY 29,998 17.3 650 350 9,310 0.5043 21 0.43807 13 104322000
JASAAN 57,055 16.7 725 125 3,325 0.5423 15 0.43783 14 104311000
ALUBIJID 32,163 14.9 198 98 2,626.75 0.6354 7 0.43768 15 104301000
TALISAYAN 25,761 19.9 275 125 3,325 0.5244 17 0.41582 16 104325000
EL SALVADOR 58,771 13.3 150 50 1,330 0.6007 9 0.41238 17 104307000
SUGBONGCOGON 9,764 17.9 410 250 6,650 0.4955 22 0.40608 18 104323000
MEDINA 35,612 18.2 285 35 931 0.5237 18 0.39802 19 104319000
LAGONGLONG 24,190 18.9 180 80 2,128 0.5134 20 0.39384 20 104313000
OPOL 66,327 12.7 0 0 0 0.5523 13 0.37425 21 104321000
BINUANGAN 7,441 20 120 20 532 0.4865 23 0.37022 22 104304000
LUGAIT 20,559 14.1 0 0 0 0.6078 8 0.3039 23 104316000
CDO 0 0 0 0 0 0.5982 10 0.2991 24 104305000
NAAWAN 22,444 16.7 0 0 0 0.5675 12 0.28375 25 104320000
MANTICAO 29,469 17.7 0 0 0 0.5368 16 0.2684 26 104318000

Figure 3.3.4 EVSA Map of Cassava in Misamis Oriental

3.3.3 Investment Plan and Strategic Direction

Investment Plan

The great challenge that agriculture sector was facing by 2015 is to produced quality safety agricultural product that
will be competitive in the global market. The development and the way food is produced, processed and sold are
changing rapidly. Consumers increasingly want safe, higher value, and varied agricultural products. This is creating
opportunities for farmers and agribusiness entrepreneurs along agricultural value chains to transform commodities
into higher value products process that can play an important role in poverty reduction. Rural poverty remains high
despite considerable progress made in poverty alleviation. The rural poor, who often depend on agriculture for their
livelihoods, can benefit from changes in agriculture, provided they are part of the emerging value chain. In 2020
during the Pandemic agriculture sector was not affected since rural development continued.

Misamis Oriental is suitable and capable of producing quality cassava, thus, the province has a great potential to
increased cassava production and sustain the position the second producer in Region 10. However, if marginal
areas which accounted to 58,573.22 hectares will be utilize and given technical and financial support the province
might be the number 1producer of cassava in Region 10. The province potentialis the center/gate way in
Mindanao, with the present of feed milling companies SMFI, cassava integrator / buyer in Cagayan de Oro the
DBA Traders, Alubijid, Villanueva, Initao, Balingoan, Salay, Lagonglong, Kinoguitan, Sugbongcogon, Medina,
Balingasag, Talisayan, CAMADA Cooperative of Balingoan the strongest Cooperative engaged in cassava
production, provided loans to members and acquired marketing agreement with SMFI and Dysang and other food
processors, make cassava a lucrative commodity. Another advantage is that we have existing Plant Materials
Multiplier Farm at Claveria.

The province is agri-industrial province, however, it remain to be an agricultural province because 67% of the total
land area still devoted to agriculture and 75% of the population depend on agriculture. Basically farmers of the
province depend large on coconut, banana, corn the top three commodities. Dependency on traditional crops of
planting rice and corn have not change much in the lives of the farmers in the province as cost of high inputs and
lower prices of the commodities during harvest season and small landholding of less than one hectare affect them
lower income. The need for more viable and sustainable development Programs, Projects and Activities ( PPA )
should be implemented with LGUs in coordination with national government as well as the partnership from the
private sector that will help augment income of the farmers and economy of the province.

To insure food security, the province shall comply with the DA policy of “No conversion” of rice and corn areas,
further more Sanguniang Bayan and Sanguniang Panlalawigan approved the delineated SAFDZ areas of the
province around 130,499 hectares. The province thrust in agriculture is sustainable farming thru, crop diversification
under coco areas with banana, cacao, coffee, corn cassava, abaca and vegetables, utilization of marginal areas for
cassava and abaca, promote contour farming in hilly areas, organic/natural farming system to minimize soil
depletion /erosion.

In order to be very sustainable, the province will also establish the necessary Climate Change resilient crop
technology, infrastructure projects and post-harvest facilities in support to the identified commodities. The vision of
improving the lives of farmers will depend largely on our interventions to reduce poverty incidence in the province by
9% in 2026. Our vision on cassava industry of the province is to improve the product of cassava from chips to
granules and produced other by product of cassava. Alleviate the lives of the 6,250 cassava farmers.

Upgrading of farm to market road network; provision of technical and financial capacity to farmers; establishment of
nurseries for high yielding varieties; and provision of post-harvest facilities are some strategic investments to ensure
meeting the market demand requirements.

Cassava Industry Strategic Direction

Misamis Oriental as an agri industrial province posted as the second top cassava producing in region 10. Although
over the five (5) years there was a decreasing volume of production but must be encourage since Bukidnon as the
top most cassava producing still it cannot meet the industrial demand of cassava. Thus, the industry strategic
development directions for cassava include:

 Institutionalize sustainable initiatives through improvement of farm productivity and establishment of

cassava agribusiness clusters in identified expansion areas;
 Chain wide improvement in net income/profitability of cassava industry without compromising price
competitiveness and with the least ecological impact; and
 Increase production of high quality chips, granules, animal feeds and pellets based on market standard
and requirements.

3.3.4 Risk Profiling for Cassava Commodity

Climate Change can have significant impact on cassava production. Major climate risk is change in temperature and
rainfall patterns, increased pest and diseases, and soil degradation. Here are some potential effects of climate
change on cassava production in the province and ways to mitigate them.

Table 3.3.6 Risk and Mitigating /Adoption Measures of Cassava

RISK MITIGATING OR ADOPTION MEASURES

Change in temperature and Farmers can implement irrigation systems, adjust planting dates, and select
rainfall patterns cassava varieties that are adapted to the changing climate
Increased pest and diseases Farmers can implement effective pest and diseases management practices,
such as integrated pest management, crop rotation and sanitation measures
Soil Farmers can adopt soil conservation practices, such as cover cropping, organic
Degradation farming, and sustainable soil management practices
Water shortage in some areas Impalements water management practices, such as rainwater harvesting,
in the province efficient water use and water recycling
Extreme Heat/ Rise in Agroforestry: Planting trees or other crops in the same area as cassava can
temperature help to improve fertility, reduce soil erosion, and provide shade for cassava.
Research and Development Develop new cassava varieties that are more resistant to the effects of climate
change as well as new management practices and technology
 3.3.5 PCIP Commodity Investment Plan of Cassava Value Chain in Misamis Oiental
Key Gap/ Potential Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraints Intervention Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Funds
INPUT
SEGMENT
Lack of access Establishment of At least one (4) Balingoan Balingasag/ Farmers still Development DA, PLGU, 3,500 3,500 DA, PLGU,
to and Plant Material PMMF and / Claveria El Salvador reluctant to use and MLGU MLGU
availability of Multiplier Farm operationalized improved planting implementation together with together with
steady supply (PMMF) material. of voucher or Cassava Cassava
of planting similar Farmer Farmer
materials schemes and Cooperatives Cooperatives
lower cost of
planting
materials
Lack of know- Financial and At Least additional Gingoog/ Claveria/ Balingasag/El Jasaan/ Planting materials Application of DA, PLGU, 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 DA, PLGU,
how to set-up Technical support 6 PMMF offering Balingoan Magsaysay Salvador Alubijid from established quality MLGU MLGU
an effective to existing (PMMF) good quality nurseries do not operation together with together with
system for planting materials return standards and Cassava Cassava
rapid of the high quality planting Farmer Farmer
multiplication yielding type
intended/projected materials with Cooperatives Cooperatives
and Work with desirable yields regular 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 DA/
distribution of MFIs/banks in the monitoring PLGU/MLGU/
new varieties development of FIs
with high yield financial support
potential, high for interested
harvest index, investors in PMMF
and high root
starch content
Low uptake/ Set-up of One demo farm / Balingoan Gingoog/ Jasaan/ El Salay/ Non-implementation Awareness and DA, ATI, 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA, ATI,
adoption of demonstration cluster /Claveria Balingasag Salvador Alubijid by existing nursery promotion of PLGU, PLGU,
nursery farms to showcase operators; benefits to all MLGU MLGU
produced benefits of using Indiscriminate levels together with together with
planting planting materials purchasing by &Accreditation Cassava Cassava
materials from nurseries farmers. of nursery Farmer Farmer
Development of Capability Building Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or operators Cooperatives 500 500 500 500 Cooperatives
capacity of nursery of PMMF
operators/ Operators & will
multiplication farms extend technical
to deliver technical support to farmers
advice to farmer
clients include
quality assurance
Plant Now Pay At least 90% of All All cassava All cassava All DA, ATI, 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 DA, ATI,
 Later with Planting the farmers will be cassava area area cassava PLGU, PLGU,
materials provided with area area MLGU MLGU
( Farmers will quality planting together with together with
return doubled the materials Cassava Cassava
number of plant Farmer Farmer
materials received) Cooperatives Cooperatives
Dissemination of Conduct info drive Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
success stories/ thru print media,
Information TV and Radio
Education
Campaign on cost-
benefit analysis in
using nursery
grown materials

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Funds
Lack of Orientation/IEC on At least 1 All All All All Farmers : Intensive IEC DA, ATI, 250,000 250,00 250,000 250,000 DA, ATI,
enforcement of quality standards for orientation/IEC cassava cassava cassava Cassava would not on the benefits of PLGU and 0 PLGU and
planting planting materials per conducted per year area area area Areas adhere to quality standards MLGU MLGU
materials cassava farmer standards and its together with together with
quality cooperative/group harmonization Cassava Cassava
standards Farmer Farmer
Lack of Technical assistance Cooperative Cooperatives
common in the development of s
interpretation pilot implementation
and of quality assurance
understanding system
of standards Dissemination of
standards to all
potential clients
through mainstream
media or on-site
visitation/lecture
Limited supply Establishment of 1 new organic Claveria Balingoa Balingasag El Farmers Promo campaign DA, PLGU 500 500 500 5000 DA, PLGU
of organic facilities (e.g. fertilizer facilities n Salvador would not to promote and MLGU and MLGU
fertilizer composting facilities, established in the acquire, pay benefits and together with together with
appropriate for grinder, shredder) for proximity of and apply awareness. Cassava Cassava
cassava organic fertilizer existing cassava organic Farmer Farmer
farming production at farms fertilizer in Cooperative Cooperatives
proximity of existing their farms. s
 cassava farms
High cost Technical and At least 90% of All All Areas All Areas All Farmers Enforcement of DA,ATI,
(financial and financial assistance farmers Areas Areas would not ordinances/polic PLGU and
environment) to existing and capacitated in acquire, pay y to reduce use MLGU
of chemical potential organic organic fertilizer and apply of chemicals and together with
fertilizer fertilizer producers production organic emissions. Cassava
to: fertilizer in Financial Farmer
- Develop inputs Increased volume their farms. services adapted Cooperative
appropriate for of organic fertilizer to product cycle s
cassava supply at and farmer´s
smallholders affordable prices cash flow.
- Scale up and align
operations to
sustainable
production
practices

Documentation and
dissemination of
emerging good
practices in organic
fertilizer production
Low use of Implementation of Input Subsidy All All Areas All Areas All DA, ATI, 7,500 7,500 7,500 7,500 DA, ATI,
fertilizer/ Lack voucher program or project Areas Areas PLGU and PLGU and
of willingness similar market-based implemented with MLGU MLGU
to spend on mechanism to a resulting together with together with
fertilizer stimulate purchase increased number Cassava Cassava
and use of fertilizer of farmers applying Farmer Farmer
and buy down risks fertilizers/95,000 Coop Cooperatives
bags

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Lead Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Funds
Development of Capacitate 1 Claveria Balingoa Gingoog Balingasag DA, ATI, PLGU 350 350 350 350 DA, ATI,
 capacity to provide technical n and MLGU PLGU and
technical advice to provider/year together with MLGU
farmer clients Cassava together with
Set-up demo farms to Establishment of 1 Claveria Balingoa Gingoog Balingasag Farmer 500 500 500 500 Cassava
showcase benefits and demo per Cluster n Cooperatives Farmer
effective use of fertilizer Cooperatives
Dissemination of 1 Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. 600 600 600 600
success stories documentation/year
& Forum
PRODUCTION
Fragmented Technical and At least 1 Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Continuity Highlighting of DA, ATI, 500 500 500 500 DA, ATI,
and dispersed financial support in Capability Building of sporadic benefits to be PLGU and PLGU and
production sites the development and Activities farm acquired from MLGU MLGU
resulting to piloting of nucleus conducted /year locations concentrated together with together with
high
transaction
farm and cluster or clustered Cassava Cassava
costs partnership models farm locations Farmer Farmer
Promotion of public Increase in number All All Areas All Areas All Areas and possible Cooperatives 100 100 100 100 Cooperative
and private sector of coops/1 Coop/ Areas support to the s
investment to LGUs that are establishment
facilitate replication vertically integrated of access and
and scaling-up with feed mills and provision of
Orientation/IEC on other lead firms materials
cassava farm
expansion and ideal
farm conditions and
location for cassava
production in cluster
areas
Other farmers Conduct of orientation 1 Fora/ All All Areas All Areas All Areas Investments Pair orientation DA,ATI, PLGU 500 500 500 500 DA,ATI, PLGU
are not aware or holding of fora on Orientation/IEC Areas from with market and MLGU and MLGU
of the potential cassava production conducted per year orientation / matching and together with together with
opportunities in market and demands capability establishing Cassava Cassava
cassava and tying up of building will buyer-producer Farmer Farmer
production prospective product not translate linkages Cooperatives Cooperatives
buyers with existing and to cassava
new cassava producers farm
expansion or
increased
number of
cassava
farmers
Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Funds
Farmers Capability building on 1 capability Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA, ATI, 500 500 500 500 DA, ATI,
interested in cassava production building on PLGU and PLGU and
cassava and cassava value cassava MLGU MLGU
farming do not chain production together with together with
have or lack conducted for Cassava Cassava
access to interested Farmer Farmer
resources farmers per Cooperatives Cooperatives
(skills, year
knowledge Establishment of a One (1) Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. 300 300 300 300
and finances) Technical Support Technical
to do so Team to address Support Team
queries of farmers from organized per
land preparation to cluster
final sale stages
At the Orientation/IEC on 1 orientations Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Farmers IEC should be DA, ATI, 500 500 500 500 DA, ATI,
production quality standards and on quality cannot keep complemented with PLGU and PLGU and
level, supply is its benefits in terms of standards up with technical support on MLGU MLGU
characterized final sale transactions conducted per quality updated farming together with together with
by inconsistent year requirements methods and ways in Cassava Cassava
quality due to attaining desired Farmer Farmer
IEC in the form Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. limited product quality Cooperatives 500 500 500 500 Cooperatives
of pamphlets, resources
leaflets and and age-old
brochures are farming
distributed to practices
existing
cassava
farmers
PROCESSING/POSTHARVEST
Lack of post- Provision of post- One (1) set of Balingoan All All All Farmers will : Forge agreement DA, DTI, 200,000 150,000 150,000 150,00 DA, DTI,
harvest harvest , Cassava post-harvest (KAMADA Cassava Cassava Cassava not patronize with farmers and DOST, PLGU 0 DOST, PLGU
facilities Milling, Processing and facilities ) Area Area Area provided farmer cooperatives and MLGU and MLGU
Marketing Enterprise equipment or on processing and together with together with
90% increase in will proceed utilization of post- Cassava Cassava
number of to final sale harvest facilities Farmer Farmer
farmers without Cooperatives Cooperatives
engaged in processing
chipping

Increase
Volume of good
 quality chips
and granules
Acquisition of mobile 16 Mobile All All All All Mobile and Tripartite MOA to be 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,00
mechanical chipper and mechanical Cassava Cassava Cassava Cassava CSF signed between co-
common service facility chipper and Area Area Area Area operators do financiers/stakeholde
for drying for areas common service not deliver r and beneficiaries
below 100 hectares facility services to
Promotion of use of IEC once a year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. farmers 500 500 500 500
facilities among farmers under
Development of core 1 Core Group All All All All agreed cost 500 500 500 500
group of mentors on per LGUs Cassava Cassava Cassava Cassava and
Good Manufacturing Area Area Area Area schemes.
Practices (chipping and
drying) services
embedded with rental of
mobile chipper

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Funds
Cost contribution in set-up of 1 Common service Claveria Balingo Balinga Gingoog Farmers do Encourage DA, DTI, 20,000 20,00 20,00 20,00 DA, DTI,
common services facilities facilities set up / an sag not avail of traders to buy DOST, PLGU 0 0 0 DOST, PLGU
aligned to GMP year services only cassava and MLGU and MLGU
chips in areas together with together with
where mobile Cassava Cassava
chippers are Farmer Farmer
available Cooperatives Cooperatives

Limited Technical assistance in One (1) capability Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. Or. Existing Pair orientation DA, 700 700 700 700 DA,
know-how customization of existing building activity Or. farmers will and capability DTI,PLGU DTI,PLGU
and skills on GMP modules on chipping, conducted per not apply building with and MLGU and MLGU
Good drying, and storage in year on new existing market together with together
Manufacturi collaboration with key VC manufacturing technology demands and Cassava with
ng Practices Players and sustainable due to prospective Farmer Cassava
and production added cost buyers of Cooperatives Farmer
Sustainable practices and time processed Cooperative
Production required products, s
Practices highlight
Lack of Development of a core preferences of
access to group of local experts to the industry
training provide hands-on training and
services on and mentoring to users of competitive
GMP and postharvest facilities as
sustainable embedded service of CSF
production
practices
MARKETING
Poor flow of Establishment of an 80% of existing All All All All Cassava Farmers and Emphasis on MARKETIN 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 MARKETIN
information on information system on market farmers and farmer Cassav Cassav Cassav Area other VC collective or G G
demand and demand forecast and cooperatives are a Area a Area a Area players will industry level DA, DTI, DA, DTI,
supply corresponding supply linked/connected to not share marketing shall DOST, PLGU, DOST,
requirements requirements among farmers each other and able information be given MLGU, PLGU,
and farmer cooperatives to exchange to maintain Farmers MLGU,
through the use of modern information competitive Cooperative Farmers
technology advantage Cooperative
Orientation/IEC on market A website on All All All All Cassava (individualist
MARKETIN
indicator sources such as integrated cassava Cassav Cassav Cassav Area ic mind-set)
publications, magazines, statistics and a Area a Area a Area G
website subscriptions, etc. updates created for
the whole province
Technical assistance and Increase in number All All All All Cassava Players Incremental
capability building to farmer of purchase Cassav Cassav Cassav Area especially build-up of
cooperatives on mapping agreements a Area a Area a Area farmers not relationships
cassava production areas and between farmers willing to using both
its planting and harvesting and traders as forge longer formal and
schedules including projected opposed to spot term informal
yield transactions contractual mechanisms
agreement
Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 202 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
3 Funds
Inadequate Capability Building on the At least 80% of the All All Areas All Areas All Areas Hesitation : Capability DA, DTI, 500 500 500 500 DA, DTI,
packaging utilization of modern total number of Are and inability building to DOST, PLGU, DOST,
and technology as a tool for farmers attended as on the part include MLGU, PLGU,
promotion marketing end products capability building of farmers to arrangements on Farmers MLGU,
capabilities of activity use modern collective Cooperative Farmers
farmers and Establishment of Trading Post Construction of Clav technology promotion or 174,000 Cooperative
farmer groups Trading Post, eria publicity and
to attract local Claveria inclusion of
and younger
international members to
buyers maintain
webpage
INTERFIRM RELATIONSHIPS/VC GOVERNANCE
Weak Capability One (1) capability All All Areas All Areas All Areas Farmers Technical DA, DOLE, 250 250 250 250 DA, DOLE,
capacity of building/Orientation on building/orientation Are and farmer Support group CDA, PLGU, CDA, PLGU,
farmers to cooperative/association activity conducted per as groups and lead MLGU to MLGU to
organize formation and year with no existing unwilling to organizations to extend extend
themselves development and organized groups or formally emphasize technical technical
into structured technical assistance on with high number of new organize benefits of support and support and
groups the submission of cassava farmers themselves collective capacitate capacitate
requirements to pertinent bargaining and farmers and farmers and
government agencies meeting the farmer groups farmer
Development of capacity 90% of existing and new required volume to formally groups to
of farmers to incrementally farmers organized into of big buyers organize formally
associate, collaborate, cooperatives/associatio themselves organize
and coordinate to achieve ns themselves
economies of scale in
their transactions and to
become attractive
partners to large buyers
Dominance of Capability building on One (1) capability All All Areas All Areas All Areas Farmers and Capability DA and DTI to DA and DTI
spot medium-term and long- building activity Are farmer building will be capacitate to capacitate
transactions term contract agreements conducted per year as groups will complemented farmers and farmers and
not engage with linking farmer farmer
in medium producers with cooperatives cooperatives
and long buyers offering on forging on forging
term advantageous or medium and medium and
contracts fair contract long-term long-term
arrangements contract contract
agreements agreements
with buyers with buyers
with with
participation of participation
LGUs of LGUs
Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Players Funds
SUPPORT SERVICES:
Limited Technical assistance to 1 providers per All All All All Areas Proliferation Work with DA and DTI 250,00 250,00 250,00 250,000 DA and DTI
outreach of existing and new cluster Areas Areas Areas of free NCI to to gather 0 0 0 to gather
existing providers in the services from disseminate support support
providers development of business One (1) forum NGOs and objectives providers providers and
models, services, and conducted in each government towards and their their
delivery schemes cluster per year agencies developmen prospective prospective
which will t of a vibrant users to users to level
80% of farmers undermine support level off off
Lack of Conduct of a forum to acquiring and viability of markets; expectation expectations
know-how gather existing and new adopting services program Campaign s
to develop providers as well as supported and VC players
sustainable farmers and farmer providers orientation VC players (traders,
system for groups to exchange on how to (traders, progressive
embedded information on supply promote progressive farmers,
services needs and schedules win-win farmers, assemblers,
developmen assemblers feed mills)
Lack of Build up capacity of t of support , feed mills)
know-how potential and existing markets
among providers to better
providers on understand sustainable
sustainable farming principles and its
farming adaptation to local
practices context
Low Conduct of information drive Conducted IEC 1 per All All All All Areas 250 250 250 250
adoption/ (IEC) per cluster on year Areas Areas Areas
uptake of improved farming
improved technology and practices
farming
technology
and practices Support participative Prepared 1 modules
development (with feed
mills, intermediaries,
 farmers) of modules on
sustainable farming
practices to ensure
alignment with priorities of
players, learning aptitude of
farmers, and promote
ownership of technology

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Players Funds
Lack of Link financing institutions One (1) forum All All All Areas All Areas Farmers do Start with DA and DTI 250 250 250 250 DA and DTI to
access to with cassava farmers conducted per year Areas Areas not honor core group of to facilitate facilitate linking
savings, through forums and commitments farmers who linking of of MFIs and
insurance, conferences have been MFIs and farmers
and loans Invite MFIs to conduct At least five (5) MFIs proven to be farmers
which hinder orientations on financing conducted/attended loyal; Start PLGU and
formation of arrangements and options forum on financing with low risk PLGU and MLGU
longer term to cassava farmers and arrangements and activities and MLGU coordinate DA
contractual groups options small amount coordinate and DTI
commitment Conduct capacity At least 80% of the total DA and DTI
and lead to building/orientation on farmers attended
increased financing and/or availing orientation/ capability
incidences of loans to farmers and farmer building on financing
side selling groups acquisition and availing
loans

Conduct capacity Increase in number of

building/orientation on farmers with access to
enterprise financial services
profiling/packaging that will
increase likelihood of
financing (or credit rating)
LGUs/ Construction/Upgrading of Upgrading of Zone 1- 3.000 Roads and Transparenc DA, PLGU, 90,000 DA, PLGU,
MLGUs lack FMRs Dugo-dugo FMR, km infrastructure y and strict MLGU, MLGU,
financial Claveria are not monitoring BLGU BLGU People
capacity to Concreting of 1.400 serving the and People 37,800 Community
construct Aromahon-Lapad km production evaluation of Community
and/or Road, Laguindingan areas awarded
upgrade Concreting of 1.900 identified in builders and 51,300
roads Aromahon-Tiano km the VCA; their road
Road, Laguindingan Poor quality; and infra
Construction of FMR 0.61 delays during construction 85,000
with slope Protection km construction deliverables.
and sheet piles (300 Disseminati
meters long) in Sitio on of
Macusi, Brgy. geographic
Kimaya, Villanueva areas and
Concreting of Sitio 4 km beneficiaries 320,00
Bato, Brgy kimaya- to secure 0
Villanueva common
Upgrading of understandi 101,126
Dawayan-Lokong- 3.7454 km ng at all
Crossing Mambuaya levels and
FMR, Villanueva areas.
Promote
synergies

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Outcomes Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Players Funds
Concreting of Junction 12.00 complement DA, PLGU, 324,00 DA, PLGU,
Pelaez – Malagana – 0 km. ation among MLGU, 0 MLGU,
Man-ibay, Claveria builders to BLGU BLGU People
Concreting of Imelda- 8.05k ensure People 217,35 Community
Mambuaya-Kimaya Road m efficiency, Community 0
Villanueva coherence
Concreting of Katipunan- 6.50 and 175,50
Highway-Dayawan- km optimum 0
Mambuaya Road, utilization of
Villanueva funds
Concreting of Jasaan- 20,03 540,81
Claveria Road, Jasaan & km 0
Claveria
Concreting of 10.6 286,20
Panampawan-Rizal- km 0
Hinaplanan, Claveria
Concreting of Baliwagan- 37.79 1,020.
Pelaez-Impakibil Road, 0 km 33
Balingasag & Claveria
Upgrading of
3.02 km 81,540
Gimampang-Aluna-
Casilihon FMR- Initao
Upgrading/Concreting of
6 km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR,
Initao
Upgrading of Sapong-
Mamiguis-Bansilang
FMR-Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 6 Km 162,00
0
Cogon-Lulang FMR,
Initao
Upgrading/ Concreting of 7 km 189,00
0
Sinalac-Lulang FMR,
Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Calacapan Calanyugan-
Kimalok FMR, Initao
Upgrading/Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Cogon Tawan-tawan –
Aluna FMR, Initao
Upgrading/ Concreting of 2 km 54,000
Oguis-Bandrera FMR,
Initao
Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Players Funds
Upgrading of Sumalag- 2.11 km 65,000
Calubo Kinoguitan
Upgrading of 2.9 km 78,300
Salicapan-Suarez
FMR-Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Panabol- 1.34 km 36,180
Buko FMR-Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.726 46,602
Poblacion FMR, km
Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.16 31,320
Kitotok FMR,
Kinoguitan
Concreting of Sitio 12.3 246,00
Bangbang, Brgy. Buko- km 0
Suarez FMR-
Kinoguitan
Concreting of Biray – 3.000 81,000
Suarez Road, km.
Kinoguitan
Concreting of 3.000 81,000
Bolisong – Biray km.
Road, Kinoguitan
Concreting of Pob. 4.000 108,00
Talisayan-Sibantang km. 0
Road, Talisayan
Concreting of Bugdang 2 km 54,000
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of 5 km 135,000
Minlimaw- Mahayag
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,000
Mandahilag-Macopa
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of 2 km 54,000
Poblacion –Sindangan
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Pook- 7 km 189,000
Sibantang FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of San Jose 6 km 162,000
–Bugdang –Mahayag
FMR, Talisayan
 Concreting of 5 km 135,00
Mintabon –Sibantang 0
FMR, Talisayan

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Players Funds
Concreting of San Jose 6 km 162,000
–Bugdang –Mahayag
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of 5 km 135,00
Mintabon –Sibantang 0
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of 10 km 240,00
0
Pangpangon- Putting
Balas-Sibantang-
Mahayag FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Tibon- 15.0km 580,00
Tibon-Cabalawan- 0
Mindulao-Tama FMR
with Bridge,
Magsaysay
Construction of Tibon- 15 km 580,,0
Tibon-Cabalawan- 00
Mindulao-Tama FMR
with Bridge,
Magsaysay
Construction of 10 km 270,00
Cabantian – Tulang- 0
Kauswagan
Damayuhan Road ,
Magsaysay
Construction of 6.000 162,00
Kandiis-Tibon-Tibon km 0
Road, Magsaysay
 Construction of 7km 189,00
Bonifacio – Mindulao 0
Road, Magsaysay

Construction of 11.530 311,00

Mahayahay – km 1
Katipunan-Gumabon-
Tama Road,
Magsaysay
Concreting of 2 km 54,000
Kibungsod – Cabantian
Circuferencial Road,
Magsaysay
Construction of Artadi- 5 km 150,000
San Vicente FMR,
Magsaysay
Construction of 4 km 120,000
Kibungsod-Cabubuhan
–Villa Felipa FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of 7 km 189,000
Consuelo-Bunda-
Tinaan FMR,
Magsaysay

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Players Funds
Construction of 6 km 162,000
Consuelo (Kimaya)
Pag-asa FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of 2.5 km 67,500
Cabubuhan (Lilo)
Kibungsod FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of 10 kms 200,00
Kalongonan Kandal 0
FMR , El Salvador
Concreting of 4 km 320,0
Cebukawon FMR, 00
Tagoloan
Concreting of 2 km 24,00
 Nasalaban –Subaya 0
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of 4 km 60,00
Natumolan- 0
Maribojoc FMR,
Tagolan
Rehabilitation of 3 km 45,000
Rosario FMR,
Tagoloan
Concreting of Danao 5 km 80,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of 2.2 km 176,00
Rosario – 0
Comocomo FMR,
Tagoloan
Concreting of 1.6 km 43,961
Mananum-Claveria
FMR with Bridge,
Balingasag
Concreting of 4.3 km 116,50
0
Kibalua FMR,
Balingasag
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 km 125,50
Nabuangan-Sitio 0
Lantad FMR,
Balingasag
Concreting of 4 km 320,0
Cebukawon FMR, 00
Tagoloan
Concreting of 2 km 54,00
Nasalaban –Subaya 0
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of 4 km 120,0
Natumolan- 00
Maribojoc FMR,
Tagolan

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Players Funds
Rehabilitation of 3 km 90,000
Rosario FMR,
Tagoloan
Concreting of Danao 5 km 150,00
FMR, Tagoloan 0
Concreting of 2.2 km 176,00
Rosario – 0
Comocomo FMR,
Tagoloan
Upgrading of 4.000 km. 108,000
Domagooc to
SitioPatrocenio FMR,
Jasaan
Upgrading of Solana 3.000 km. 81,000
to Sitio Looc FMR,
Jasaan
Upgrading of 5.000 km. 135,000
SitioKatu-an, Natubo
– Kimamaon Kimaya
FMR, Jasaan
Upgrading of San 6.000 km. 162,000
Antonio to Sitio
Cogon FMR, Jasaan
Concreting of San 16 km 432,000
Nicolas-Upper
Antonio-IS-Cruz
Road, Jasaan
Road Concreting at 7 km 189,000
Upper Malibud to
Dinawehan FMR,
Gingoog City
Road Concreting 4 km 108,000
Crossing San Miguel
to Kalagonoy FMR,
Gingoog City
Concreting of 8.600 km. 232,200
Maanas-Kibuguing
 Road, Medina &
Gingoog City
Concreting of Kabug- 7.000 km. 189,000
Sidlakan Road,
Medina & Gingoog
City
Concreting of San 5.500 km. 148,500
Luis – Kibuging
Road, Gingoog City

Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target Results/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Cost (000) Proposed Ran
Constraints Outcomes 2023 2024 2025 2026 Measure Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of k
Players Funds
Concreting of 4.000 km. 108,000
Talisay-Mahayahay
Road, Gingoog City
& Magsaysay
Concreting of 4.000 km. 108,000
Katipunan-Gumabon
Road, Magsaysay
III. PRIORITY COMMODITY CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

3.4 Commodity Value Chain 4: Abaca

3.4.1. Commodity Profile: Abaca

Abaca is basically a plant leaf fiber derived from the stalks of the plant. Abaca or “Manila Hemp”/ Manila
Fiber as it is better known worldwide is a commodity where Philippines dominates as the world’s top
producer and exporter having been able to account for 63 percent of the world production over a 5 year
period from 2017 to 2021 (FAOStat 2017-2021).

The most important part of the abaca is the stalk which is the source of the fiber. Abaca fiber is superior
over all other natural fibers because of its great strength and its resistance to the action of water.
Considered the strongest of natural fibers, it is three times stronger than cotton. The product is known
worldwide as the “Manila Hemp”, with the Philippines as the top producer and exporter.

The official standard grades of abaca fiber are divided into three (3) classes depending on the manner of
extraction, namely: hand-stripping, spindle-stripping and decortication. Quality is determined by strength,
cleaning, color, texture and length of the fiber.

Although the bulk of the country’s abaca fiber production is processed locally, most of these processed
products, particularly abaca pulp (78.6%), cordage/rope (4.9%), and fiber craft/fabrics (0.9%), fabrics and
yarns (0.7%) raw fiber (14.9%) are exported abroad. About 97.0% of the total abaca production in the
country is exported which generated an equivalent of more than Php8 billion revenue in 2019. The country
trades abaca in the world market in forms of fiber, pulp, cordage, yarns and fabrics, and fiber craft products.
Abaca in the Philippines is mainly grown by farmers with small land holdings concentrated in the mountain
and hinterland areas. This is in contrast to other countries like Ecuador for instance where it is grown in
large estates and production is now increasingly being mechanized. Abaca can be grown in many parts of
the Philippines. In 2021, PSA data showed that it is grown in 49 out of the 80 provinces of the country.
Share in production volume over a 5 year period from 2017-2021 is almost evenly distributed amongst the 3
islands of the Philippines. (Figure 3.4.1)

Figure 3.4.1 Volume of Production and Area Planted for Abaca in the Philippines 2017-2021

Region V or the Bicol province remains the leading producer in 2021, recording an output of 16.84 thousand
metric tons or 27.0 % contribution to the total abaca production. This was followed by Eastern Visayas with
19.5 % share and Davao Region with 14.9% share (Figure 3.4.2). In Northern Mindanao, Bukidnon is the
only province which has significant volume contributed to the overall total of the country.
 Figure 3.4.1 Distribution of Production for Abaca by Region, Philippines 2021

Although the Philippines currently dominate production of abaca, this is threatened nowadays by countries
that have recently been aggressively developing their own abaca industry. Indonesia for instance has
extended government support to its abaca farmers in order to massively grow the commodity. Likewise,
Costa Rica, Ecuador and Equatorial Guinea is increasing their areas by as much as 8 %, 11 % and 27 %,
respectively over a 5-year period from 2013 to 2017 (FAOStat). Abaca production in Indonesia, Ecaudor
and Equatorial Guinea also increasing by 5 %, 78 % and 26 %t, respectively over the 5-year period 2013-
2017 (FAOStat).

Status of volume of production in Luzon abaca production from 2017 to 2021 increases from CY2017 to
2019 and gradually decreases in 2020 and 2021. In Visayas it has an erratic up and down trend yearly from
2017 to 2021. So in Mindanao generally volume of production was increasing. As a whole in the Philippines
trend of volume production is same as in Luzon it increases from 2017 to 2019 and gradually decreases
from 2020 to 2021, as shown in Table 3.4.1.

Table 3.4.1 VOLUME OF PRODUCTION OF ABACA (MT) BY CLUSTER

YEARS
Particulars 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Luzon 26,377.62 28,997.17 29,106.28 28,230.43 16,995.22
Visayas 16,570.47 16,320.89 15,999.74 14,988.64 15,920.95
Mindanao 25,893.37 26,197.91 27,102.58 27,733.38 29,487.88
Philippines 68,841.46 71,515.97 72,208.60 70,952.44 62,404.06

In the entire country volume of production increases from 2018 to 2019, it continuously decreases from
2020 to 2021 and increases in 2022. In Northern Mindanao it was gradually decreases from 2018 to 2020,
gradually increases in 2021 and decrease in 2022.
 In Misamis Oriental from 2018 to 2019 slightly decreases and it continuously increases from 2020 to 2022
this was because abaca was promoted by Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) as livelihood project due
to existing market in Iligan City the New Tech. PhilFida also distributing free high quality planting materials.
The increase also attributed in the increase of area planted and yield due to planting of quality planting
materials.

Table 3.4. 2 VOLUME OF P[RODUCTION (MT) IN THE PHILIPPINES, NORTHERN MINDANAO AND
MISAMIS ORIENTAL FROM 2018 TO 2022

YEARS
Particulars 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
National 71,515.47 72,208.60 70,952.44 62,404.06 67,822.17
Northern 5,196.00 5,106.00 5,093.49 5,107.76 4,793.04
Mindanao
Misamis Oriental 649 636 644.65 648.54 694.82
The status of volume of production of abaca was dependent on area planted / harvested as recorded in
Table 3.4.3. In the Country area planted from 2018 to 2019 increases, slightly decreases in 2020 and
continuously increases up to 2022. Northen Mindanao area planted/ harvested it continuously decreases
from 2028 to 2019 it decreases in 2020 then increases until 2022.

In Misamis Oriental area planted was stable from 2018 to 2020; it increases in 2021 and slightly decreases
in 2022.
.

Table 3.4.3 AREA PLANTED/HARVESTED OF ABACA (HA) CY2018 –CY2022

YEARS
Particulars 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
National 132,251.00 132,369.85 132,361.91 131,510.25 135,644.34
Northern
Mindanao 5,196 5,106 5,093.49 5,107.76 9,586.08
Misamis Oriental 768 768 768 775.68 775.59

Philippines Abaca average yield over a 5-year period from 2018 to 2022 is only 0.52 MT. Bicol Region which
produces almost a third of Philippine production has an average yield of only 0.40 MT / Ha over a 5-year
period from 2018 to 2022 while BARMM and Northern Mindanao was part at 0.607 MT / Ha and 0.924 MT /
Ha. Clearly, the Philippine data shows that disparities in the level of production may be improve if only good
agronomic practices, new technologies and government support is readily available to the abaca growers.

Misamis Oriental has the highest average yield produced because of financial support from DAR exact
fertilization and quality planting materials were given plus provision of appropriate stripping machine.
 Table 3.4.4 AVERAGE YIELD ABACA (MT/HA)

PARTICULARS YEARS
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
National 0.54 0.55 0.54 0.47 0.50
Northern Mindanao 0.67 0.69 0.75 0.92 0.50
Misamis Oriental 0.85 0.83 0.84 0.84 0.89

In Misamis Oriental highest producing municipality/city was Naawan because of the assistance from DAR
and near to the biggest buyer in the Region the New Tech in Iligan City and Gingoog City. Abaca production
mostly concentrated in Gingoog Bay Development Area Magsaysay to Balingoan (GBDA), Mis. Or. Eastern
Town (MISORET) from Kinoguitan to Balingasag, Claveria, Jasaan, Villanueva (CLAJAVETA) and
Manticao, Naawan and Lugait (MANLUNA) cluster.

Table 3.4.5 Existing Area Planted, Farmers Involved, Area Harvested and Production of Abaca
2022 by Municipality/City Plus Expansion Area of Abaca in Misamis Oriental

Existing Expansion
Municipality Population Poverty Area No. of Area Production Area
Incidence Planted Farmers Harvested (Mt.) (HA)
Magsaysay 36,803 25.8 5.5 15 5.5 4.9
Gingoog City 136,698 22.7 180 200 180 160.2 150
Medina 35,612 18.2 15 30 15 13.35 50
Talisayan 25,761 19.9 80 100 80 71.2 45
Balingoan 11,020 18.5 8 15 8 7.12
Kinoguitan 14,091 17.1 50 75 50 44.5
Sugbongcogon 9,764 17.9 5 50 25 22.25 150
Binuangan 7,441 17.1 25 8 5 4.45 200
Salay 29,998 17.3 5 10 5 4.45 100
Lagonglong 24,190 18.9 18 25 18 16.02 50
Balingasag 74,385 20.1 14 15 14 12.46 10
Jasaan 57,055 16.7 40 75 40 35.6
Villanueva 40,419 16.0 4.5 15 4.5 4.29
Claveria 52,478 22.1 15 35 15 13.35 100
Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 5 20 5 4.45
Opol 66,327 12.7 45 45 45 40.05
El Salvador 58,771 13.3 0
Alubijid 32,163 14.9 9.59 10 9.59 4.89
Laguindingan 26,363 15.2 0
Gitagum 17,920 15.8 1 1 1 0.89
Libertad 12,948 17.9 0
Initao 33,902 17.0 0
Naawan 22,444 16.7 190 200 190 177 30
Manticao 29,469 17.7 35 35 35 31.15 60
Lugait 20,559 14.1 25 25 25 22.25
Misamis Oriental
957,900 21.4 775.59 1,004 775.59 694.82 805

Figure 3.4.3 Commodity Map of Abaca in Misamis Oriental

3.4.2 Abaca Industry Strategic Development Directions and Investment Plan

Investment Plan

Baroña5 (2005) contends that the Philippine’s monopoly of the abaca industry in the world market is slowly
slipping from the country’s grips. A Japanese owner of an abaca plantation in Davao has also established
plantations in Ecuador – the country’s most probable strongest competitor in the abaca industry. It is the
only other country which is by far, producing abaca in substantial volume for the world next to the
Philippines. Ecuador has been aggressively pursuing massive expansion of abaca farms by giving
government support to its farmers. Apart from Ecuador, Indonesia has also been steadily developing its own
abaca industry. If the Philippine government will not lend strong support to the industry, it will not be long
when the country is finally overtaken by its competitors in the world market.

Misamis Oriental is one of the contributing producers of abaca in Northern Mindanao (Region 10). The
province considered abaca is one of the major priority commodities because of high market potential. Hence
appropriate interventions have to be undertaken for the fiber industry in Misamis oriental. The province
average yield for instance is comparatively higher than other major abaca producing provinces such as
Catanduanes, Surigao del Sur and even Bukidnon. It is therefore important that areas of abaca plantation
that need rehabilitation and expansion be provided with access to high yielding varieties which is disease
and pest resistant varieties. The Philippine Fiber Industry Development Authority (PhilFIDA) and the LGU of
Misamis Oriental have to consider this intervention to be pursued for the development of the industry. The
most important elements for successful abaca production is the provision of high yielding varieties with is
also resistance to pest and diseases. To assured the abaca farmers PLGU Misamis oriental Established
Tissue Culture Laboratory with the help of DOST, DTI and PhilFida. Since most of the abaca farms are
located in the hinterlands of the province production farm-to-market roads (FMR) that are in better shape
are also an important component of the enabling environment for the industry, that will facilitates easier and
cheaper movement of inputs as well as provides access to better market areas. Another investment that is
also important to produced high quality fibers is the provision of stripping machine.

Thus, the above mention interventions must be considered. The province is highly suitable in producing high
quality abaca fiber because of its agronomic requirement for abaca production is present namely the soil
and climate is favorable. With the goal of the new administration “PAGLAUM” wherein agriculture
development is sustainable agriculture thru resilient farming practices. Because of limited land holdings
intercropping, multiple cropping system especially coconut farmers.

At present the province has an existing coconut area of about 121,698 hectares the subject for intercropping
with cacao, banana, abaca and cassava. Other thrust of abaca industry of the province is to access export
market by developing 3,080 hectares that will benefits 4,100 farmers.

Abaca Industry Strategic Development Directions

In order to increase the province market share on abaca, the following are the developmental direction of
the province:

 Increase areas devoted to abaca to promote intercropping of abaca in coconut areas and planting
of abaca in none utilize areas.
  Improvement of farm productivity thru consistency in the provision of high quality planting
materials thru strong convergence initiative between DAR, DTI, DOST and PhilFiDA and
provision of production loan..
 Production of high quality fiber thru provision of appropriate post-harvest equipment/ facilities.
 Facilitate market so that benefits of profits will be to the farmers.
 Facilitate access export market.

3.4.3 Expanded Vulnerability Sustainability Assessment (EVSA) of Abaca

The expanded vulnerability sustainability assessment (EVSA) for Abaca in Misamis Oriental include the
following parameters, 50% soil suitability, 10% area planted, 10% production volume of the commodity, 10%
number of farmers engaged in abaca, 15% poverty incidence and 5% population in determining the ranking
of areas where the commodity is most suitable to be propagated and its value chain developed. Areas with
0.400 new composite index is most suitable for abaca production.

Result of the EVSA for the abaca commodity is presented in the Table 3.4.6 recorded the area suitable for
abaca production generally the province is suitable for abaca production since only Balingoan and
Binuangan got below 0.4000 new composite index. The following municipality/ city suitable for abaca,
Gingoog City the top most suitable, Naawan, Talisayan, Laguindingan, Jasaan Tagoloan,Manticao,
Magsaysay, Balingasag, Kinoguitan, Villanueva, Opol, Initao, Gitagum, Libertad, Claveria, Sugbongcogon,
Alubijid, Lugait, Medina, Lagonglong, Salay and El Salvador City.

Table 3.4.6 EVSA RESULTS OF ABACA IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL

Municipality Poverty Population Area No. of Production Old Old New New
Incidence Planted Farmer Composit Rank Composite Rank
e Index Index
GINGOOG CITY 22.7 136698 330 200 160.2 0.4659 25 0.70544 1
NAAWAN 16.7 22444 220 200 177 0.603 10 0.67347 2
TALISAYAN 19.9 25761 125 100 71.2 0.5475 19 0.52698 3
LAGUINDINGAN 15.2 26363 0 0 0 0.76 1 0.47801 4
JASAAN 16.7 57055 40 75 35.6 0.5763 14 0.47584 5
TAGOLOAN 16.8 80319 5 20 4.45 0.6582 6 0.47018 6
SUGBONGCOGON 17.9 9764 155 50 22.25 0.5483 18 0.46633 7
MANTICAO 17.7 29469 95 35 31.15 0.5719 16 0.46353 8
MAGSAYSAY 25.8 36803 5.5 15 4.9 0.5736 15 0.4622 9
BALINGASAG 20.1 74385 24 15 12.46 0.5924 12 0.46208 10
KINOGUITAN 17.1 14091 50 75 44.5 0.556 17 0.46036 11
VILLANUEVA 16 40419 4.5 15 4.29 0.6731 5 0.45563 12
OPOL 12.7 66327 45 45 40.45 0.5852 13 0.44969 13
INITAO 17 33902 0 0 0 0.6763 4 0.44939 14
BINUANGAN 17.1 7441 225 8 4.45 0.5429 20 0.44828 15
GITAGUM 15.8 17920 1 1 0.89 0.6967 2 0.44806 16
LIBERTAD 17.9 12948 0 0 0 0.6766 3 0.44711 17
CLAVERIA 22.1 52478 115 35 13.35 0.4747 24 0.44493 18
ALUBIJID 14.9 32163 9.59 10 4.89 0.6539 7 0.43601 19
LUGAIT 14.1 20559 25 25 22.25 0.6201 8 0.4322 20
MEDINA 18.2 35612 65 30 13.35 0.5237 22 0.42293 21
LAGONGLONG 18.9 24190 68 25 16.02 0.5212 23 0.42149 22
SALAY 17.13 29998 105 10 4.45 0.536 21 0.41789 23
EL SALVADOR 13.3 58771 0 0 0 0.6188 9 0.40823 24
BALINGOAN 18.5 11020 8 15 7.12 0.5212 23 0.38613 25

Figure 3.4.4 EVSA Map of Abaca in Misamis Oriental

3.4.4 Risk Profiling for Abaca Commodity

One of the main concerns related to climate change is the changing weather patterns. As the climate
becomes more unpredictable, it can lead to extreme weather events such as droughts, flood, and typhoons,
which can damage or destroy abaca production. This can result in reduced yield, lower quality fiber and
increased production costs.

The increase in temperature and change in rainfall patterns can also affect the growth rate and the quality of
abaca fibers. Higher temperature can cause the fibers to become weaker, reducing the overall quality of the
product, and increasing the risk of breakage during processing. Changes in rainfall patterns can also affect
growth rate of abaca plants, potentially leading to decrease in yield.

The change in temperature can also affect the incidence and distribution of pests and diseases that can
attack abaca plants. Rising temperature and change in rainfall pattern can create conditions that are more
conducive to the spread of these pest and diseases, which can lead to a reduction in yields and quality of
fiber.

Below are some of the strategies to mitigate the effect of climate change on abaca production.

1. Use climate resilient verities

Developing and using abaca verities that are more resistant to climate extremes, such as droughts
and floods can help ensure that abaca plantations can withstand changing weather patterns.

2. Improve soil fertility

Enhancing soil fertility through appropriate fertilization and soil management practices can help
increase the resilience of abaca plants and improve yield.

3. Optimize irrigation systems:

Abaca growers can reduce water use and ensure that their plantations are more resilient to drought
4. Implement pest and desease management strategies
Effective pest and disease management practices such as early detection and treatment can help
to prevent or minimize damage to abaca crops.

5. Enhance intercopping
Inercropping abaca with other crop such as fruit trees or vegetables can help improve soil health
and reduce the vulnerability of the plantation to climate extremes.

6. Practice sustainable agriculture

Sustainable agricultural practices such as conservation tillage, crop rotation, and cover cropping
can help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, enhance soil health, and improve the overall
resilience of abaca plantation
7. Increase resilience of supply chain
Implementing measures to improve the resilience of the abaca supply chain, such as diversifying
markets and strengthening logistics and transportation systems that can help to mitigate impact of
climate change on the industry
3.4.5 PCIP Gap Matrix Abaca Fiber Value Chain in Misamis Oriental

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risks Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Intervention (subprojects: including # of farmers Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate Adoption Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of Funds
in the Province (from enterprise or infrastructure, reached, if applicable MFO geologic, pest Measure Players/
the national & business enabling program, & diseases) other
regional VCA etc.) players
results)

INPUT SUPPLY

Lack of supply of Strengthen - Establishment of 8 Gingoo Change in Use climate DA- 500,000 DA-PRDP/
disease-resistant high convergence initiative Community Seed g City temperature resilient PRDP/ PLGU/MLGU/
yielding varieties among government Bank Abaca Nurseries affects the varieties, LGUs// PhilFiDA/ DTI/
abaca planting agencies to provide (CSBAN) Planting growth rate of develop and NGA DOST/NGA
abaca and may use abaca
materials quality planting Materials from the cause low yield varities that are
materials to Tissue Plant Tissue and produce more resistant
culture Laboratory and Laboratory poor quality to climate
commercial plant fiber extremes
nursery operator to - Development of
produce quality capacity of 20
diseases free planting Community Seed
materials to CSBAN. Bank Nursery
Operators to provide
technical assistance.

- Accreditation of 8
CSBN

-Provision of loan
assistance to 8 CSBN
operators.
Low productivity and Upgrading of the Upgrading of PLGU Sugbo The existing .Line agency DA- 500,000 DA-PRDP/
low production Existing Plant Tissue Sugbongcogon Plant ngcogo Tissue with program PRDP/ PLGU/ MLGU/
because lack of Laboratory equipment Tissue Laboratory n Laboratory on abaca LGUs// DAR/ DOST/
knowledge for Tissue and expansion of equipment and could not production NGA DTI /NGA
should allocate
culture operator on Building. expansion of building accommodate funds and
the standard protocol the needs of Execute MOA
of Tissue Culture MLGUs
 production
Key Gap/ Constraint in Brief Description of Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
VC Development in the Potential Intervention Outcome, including # Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province (from the (subprojects: enterprise of farmers reached, if MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional VCA or infrastructure, applicable Players
results) business enabling
program, etc.)
Establishment /Scaling Establishment Gingoo Talisay Mantic Not included in To be included DA-PRDP 350,000 350,000 350,000 DA-PRDP/
up of Existing Nurseries /Scaling up of 8 Plant g City an ao LGU priority in PLGU/ /LGUs/ PLGU
Nursery project & lack of MLGU AIP and NGAs /MLGU/
technical expert. conduct NGA
capability
building on
abaca nursery
propagation
and
management
Majority of farmers will Promote abaca -Conduct 1 cluster Mis. Mis Or. Participants may Letter of DA-PRDP DA-PRDP/
not use/ purchase production and its farmers forum on Or. not be interested invitation must /LGUs/ 1,000 1,000 PLGU
planting materials from significant to farmers and abaca production and mostly be channel to NGAs /MLGU/
nurseries and do not the economy to Fas/ representative of MLGUs and NGA
Cooperatives.. -Plant Now pay later Mis. Mis. Mis. abaca farmers. should indicate 5,000 5,000 5,000
appreciate benefits of /loan program to 500 Or. Or. Or. that must be
doing so. farmers abaca farmers.

-Establishment of 10 Gingoo Magsa Sugbo 1,500 2,000 1.500

abaca demo farm g ysay/ ngcogo
using planting /Talisa Salay/ n/
materials from plant yan/La Claveri Medina
nursery gonglo a/ /
ng Naawa Mantic
n ao
-Documentation & 0.500 0.500 0.500
dissemination of Gingoo Claveri
emerging good g a Medina
practices.
Lack of access to Agri Input Provision -Provision production Mis. Mis. Mis. Farmers will not Affordable DA-PRDP 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA-PRDP/
agricultural inputs (Fertilizer, Herbecide, loan to 500 farmers Or. Or. Or. avail the loan they credit scheme /LGUs/ PLGU
Lack of capital Insecticide) Labor want free. with MOA NGAs /MLGU/
subsidy provision -Free tractor services NGA
(establishment and to 500 farmers
maintenance) linkage to
financial institution.
Key Gap/ Constraint in Brief Description of Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
VC Development in the Potential Intervention Outcome, including # Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province (from the (subprojects: enterprise of farmers reached, if MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional VCA or infrastructure, applicable Players
results) business enabling
program, etc.)
PRODUCTION
Low technological Development of CSBAN shall Easter Wester Mis. Continuity of Highlighting of DA,ATI, 320 640 640 DA-PRDP/
capacity and lack of community-based provide 1 Mis. n Mis. Or. sporadic farm benefits to be PLGU, PLGU
access to providers/ providers/ trainers on technology provider Or. Or. location acquired from MLGU & /MLGU/
services to improve sustainable farming concentrated Farmer NGA
agronomic practices, practices and or clustered Cooperative
reduce incidence of enterprise farm locations
insects and diseases management and possible
including delivery and support to the
financial sustainability establishment
schemes of access and
provision of
Technical & Financial Conduct 1 planting 500 500 500
Support in the set-up Capability Training Mis. Mis. Mis. materials.
Or. Or. Or.
of model farms to on sustainable
showcase good abaca farming practices &
farming technologies enterprise mgt.
and venue for learning including delivery
and financial
scheme

Low uptake and Support the set-up of 5 Model Farm Salay/ Magsa Mantic Low yield due to Improve soil DA,ATI, 2,000 2,000 1,500 DA-PRDP/
adoption of good model farms to established Lagong ysay/ ao/ climate change fertility through PLGU, PLGU
agronomic showcase good abaca long/ Gingoo Naawa and extreme appropriate MLGU & /MLGU/
practices/sustainable farming technologies Claveri g n/ weather. fertilization and Farmer NGA
a/Talis /Medin Alubijid soil
farming practices and venue for learning Giving awards/ ayan a/Sugb management
Cooperative
incentive to farms ongcog practices
Support conduct of selected as learning on
knowledge transfer sites 6 learning sites
including learning and Mis. Or
innovation events such Mis. Mis. 2,000 2,000 2,000
as competitions. Or. Or.
Key Gap/ Constraint in Brief Description of Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
VC Development in the Potential Intervention Outcome, including # Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2025 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province (from the (subprojects: enterprise of farmers reached, if MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional VCA or infrastructure, applicable Players
results) business enabling
program, etc.)
Lack of capacity to Foster closer At least 3 Lead Firm Salay/ Mantic Magsa DA,PLGU, 2,000 2,000 2,500 DA-PRDP/
comply with Rainforest partnerships with lead to assist farmers’ Naawa ao/ ysay/ MLGU LGUs/ NGA
Alliance certification firms (e.g., New Tech cooperative to get n/ Lagong Gingoo & ,Farmer
requirements Pulp) and encourage a Rainforest Alliance Claveri long/Su g/ Cooperatives
shift of approach to Certification a gbongc Medina
supply chain ogon /
development from price Talisay
to capacity an
Matching grant to help
LGUs achieve
Rainforest Alliance
certification
Lack of access to Design a light/efficient Ten (26) low cost, light Mis. Or Mis. DA,PLGU, 6,500 6,500 DA-PRDP/
production, drying and low cost, portable, potable and easily Or. MLGU LGUs/ NGA
postharvest facilities stripping machine and operated stripping & ,Farmer
easy to operate machine. machine /Spindle Cooperatives
machine
Support the upgrading of Provision of 10 Mis. Mis. High maintenance bulk purchase DA,PLGU, 7,000 7,000 DA-PRDP/
existing collective portable abaca Or. Or. costs of parts & of spare parts MLGU LGUs/ NGA
enterprises and/or set-up stripper & twining accessories & no for & ,Farmer
of GMP complaint machine unit with FA/coops takers maintenance & Cooperatives
common service facilities warehouse for storage due to high source out
(stripping machine, dryer, & Drying to each financial funds from DA-
storage facility, and FA/coops. Land requirements PRDP, with
transportation services) Banking for equity funds
warehouse from FA/coop.
Key Gap/ Constraint in Brief Description of Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
VC Development in the Potential Intervention Outcome, including Sub/ 2003 2004 2005 2006 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2003 2004 2005 2006 Source of
Province (from the (subprojects: enterprise or # of farmers MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional VCA infrastructure, business reached, if Players
results) enabling program, etc.) applicable
Provision of decorticating Provision of 10 Mis. Mis. Women in the IEC to DA-PRDP, 5,000 5,000 DA-PRDP/
machine-to process the units of portable Or. Or. target brgys not wives/women PLGU LGUs/ NGA
wastage from stripping abaca weaving interested in on the by- C/MLGU & FA
and machine UV Machine (Hinabol) weaving the product of & COOP
cellophane for drying to FAs/ Coops. abaca into other abaca for
by-products. livelihood
Support the upgrading of Established 5 Clave Gingoo Lagong Naawa Investments Pair DA-PRDP, 100,00 100,000 100,000 100,000 DA-PRDP/
existing collective GMP/Upgrading ria g long/ n orientation and orientation DTI, PLGU, LGUs/ NGA
enterprises and/or set-up of Common Service capability with market C/MLGU, FA,
GMP compliant common Facility / Trading building will not matching & & COOP
service facilities (stripping
machine, dryer, storage
Post translate to establishing
facility, and transportation abaca farm buyer-
services) expansion or producer
increased no. of linkages
banana growers
and processors
Capability Building on Training of 60 . Mis. Or Mis. no abaca planters Require the DA-PRDP, 500 500 DA-PRDP/
Abaca Fiber Weaving for trainors on Abaca Or. wives are willing assigned brgy DTI, PLGU, LGUs/ NGA
livelihood of women Weaving for to undertake the AT to C/MLGU, FA,
livelihood of women trainers training accompany the & COOP
concern women
participants that
will undertake
the weavers
trainers training
Key Gap/ Constraint in Brief Description of Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
VC Development in the Potential Intervention Outcome, including Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province (from the (subprojects: enterprise or # of farmers MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional VCA infrastructure, business reached, if Players
results) enabling program, etc.) applicable
MARKETING
Lack of unified product Training on Fiber Strengthening of Mis. Mis. Mis. Geologic and Improve DA-PRDP, 500 500 500 DA-PRDP/
(Fiber) Standard Classification for buyers quality assurance Or. Or. Or. climate hazards resiliency DTI, PLGU, LGUs/ NGA
and AEWs interpretation. can decrease the through C/MLGU, FA,
resiliency of the diversifying & COOP
supply chain markets and
strengthening
logistics and
transportation
system.
Dominance of all-in Technical assistance in Conduct 1 Mis. Mis. Mis. DA,DTI, 500 500 500 DA-PRDP/
procurement which the harmonization of Fora/Training Or. Or. Or. PLGU, LGUs/ NGA
provides disincentives interpretation of /year MLGU
for upgrading standards and pricing &Farmer
structure and its Cooperative
implementation/
enforcement

Strengthen capacity of
existing formal and
informal information
systems to disseminate
accurate price
information

Lack of scale and capacity to Technical assistance in the Conduct orientation Mis. Mis. Mis. Financial Tap MLGU to DA,DTI, 500 500 500 DA-PRDP/
meet requirements of pulp harmonization of & training on abaca Or. Or. Or. constraints on the provide LGUs/ NGA
PLGU,
industry such as food safety interpretation of standards product standard, part of FA/Coop & financial
and sustainability MLGU
and pricing structure and its pricing, & on AT to attend the assistance for &Farmer
certification. Problem of
procurement standard . implementation/ Rainforest Alliance orientation travelling
enforcement Certification expenses with
Cooperative
Requirements to10 counterpart
FA/coops in funds from
coordination with FA/coops
DA, FIDA, DTI &
 Abaca
consolidators
Key Gap/ Constraint in Brief Description of Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
VC Development in the Potential Intervention Outcome, including Sub/ 2023 2024 2024 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province (from the (subprojects: enterprise or # of farmers MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional VCA infrastructure, business reached, if Players
results) enabling program, etc.) applicable
Lack of price Linkage and forging Stabilized price and Mis. Mis. Mis. DA,DTI, 200 200 200 DA-PRDP/
stabilizing marketing agreement sustainability of Or. Or. Or, LGUs/ NGA
PLGU,
mechanism Supply thru market
matching. MLGU
&Farmer
Cooperative
Foster closer partnerships Training on Mis. Mis. Mis. Unable to Ensure Internet DA,DTI, 200 200 200 DA-PRDP/
with lead firms (e.g. New marketing & product Or. Or. Or, communicate on access/connect LGUs/ NGA
PLGU,
Tech Pulp) and standardization time on line. ion all the time MLGU
encourage a shift of &Farmer
approach to supply chain
development from price
Cooperative
to capability building
perspective.
Strengthen capacity of Reproduction of Mis. Mis. Mis. Pricing scheme Government DA-PRDP, 500 500 500 DA-PRDP/
existing formal and 1,500 IEC materials Or. Or. Or, and products entities and PLGU, LGUs/ NGA
informal information Abaca product standards Abaca C/MLGU,
systems to standard on fiber, between consolidators FA/COOP,
disseminate accurate pulp, cordage, Government entity must find a DTI, FIDA &
price information. yarns and fabrics, and abaca ways to ABACA
and fiber craft. consolidators may harmonize the BUYER
not be the same. abaca pricing
and product
standards
INTERFIRM RELATIONSHIPS AND SUPPLY CHAIN GOVERNANCE
Dominance of spot Strengthening of Linkaging of Abaca Mis. Or Mis. Mis. Farmers directly Tripartite DA,DTI, 200 200 200 DA-PRDP/
transactions makes cooperatives lead firm/trader with Or. Or. sells to local supply PLGU, LGUs/ NGA
farmers more vulnerable Conduct market forum and 10 abaca farmers traders at low contract/agree MLGU
to price fluctuation. Forge marketing Contract Ass./Coops with price (pole ment should &Farmer
between lead firm and C/M LGU & Traders vaulting), despite assure
Cooperative thru a tripartite of the existence of FA/Coops of a
Cooperative
Marketing the Marketing competitive
Broker marketing Agreement/ Agreement/Contra pricing scheme.
agreements among the Contract to jointly ct through FA/
FA/cooperatives, lead undertake bulk Coops.
firms/ consolidators and procurement and
concern gov’t. Entities. collective trading.
Key Gap/ Constraint in Brief Description of Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
VC Development in the Potential Intervention Outcome, including Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province (from the (subprojects: enterprise or # of farmers MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional VCA infrastructure, business reached, if Players
results) enabling program, etc.) applicable
Lack of horizontal Organizational development 1 Hauling Truck Mis. Mis. Mis. DA,DOLE, 10,000 10,000 5,000 DA-PRDP/
collaboration increase support to farmers /LGU Or. Or. Or. CDA, PLGU, LGUs/ NGA
the cost of transactions. complemented with MLGU
Weak capacity to behaviour change & ,Farmer
organize themselves into interventions and Cooperative
structured groups entrepreneurial skills
development

Lack of trust between Organizational development Provision of Mis. Mis. Mis. DA,DOLE, 500 500 500 DA-PRDP/
and among farmers support to farmers trainings to 50 Or. Or. Or. CDA, PLGU, LGUs/ NGA
complemented with abaca farmers on MLGU
behavior change entrepreneurial & ,Farmer
interventions and skills. Cooperative
entrepreneurial skills
development.
SUPPORT SERVICES
Treatment of Infected Technical Mis. Mis. Mis. DA-PRDP, 500 500 500 DA-PRDP,
areas/uproot and eradicate Assistance to 1,200 Or. Or. Or. PLGU, PLGU,
abaca farmers.
Weak Capacity to Support the groups to Availments and Mis. Mis. Mis. Diversion/juggling close DA-PRDP, 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA-PRDP,
organize themselves understand bulks. provision of Or. Or. Or. of fund monitoring of PLGU, PLGU,
revolving capital for funds/weekly
10FA/ Coops
Availment of financing Development of capacity of Availed Mis. Mis. Mis. C.MLGU, 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA-PRDP,
support from financing farmers to incrementally Financial/loans Or. Or. Or. FA/COOP, PLGU,
institution associate, collaborate, and assistance from DTI, FIDA,
(LPB ,DBP ,ACPC etc) coordinate to achieve private and ABACA
1.1 Access to economies of scale and to government lending CONSOLIDA
financing /non bearing become attractive partners firm. TOR/
interest loan program to class A traders and TRADER,
from LBP,DBP,ACPC processors. Linkage to LANDBANK &
etc. financial institution. OTHER FIs.
 Key Gap/ Constraint in Brief Description of Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
VC Development in the Potential Intervention Outcome, including Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Province (from the (subprojects: enterprise or # of farmers MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional VCA infrastructure, business reached, if Players
results) enabling program, etc.) applicable
No or Outdated Abaca Development of pest & Varietal trials of 2 Mis. Mis. Mis. Low priority for DA-PRDP & DA-PRDP, 500 500 500 DA-PRDP,
research disease resistant & high Abaca varieties that Or. Or. Or. funding for crop PLGU, PLGU, PLGU,
yielding abaca varieties are pest & disease varietal trial of C/MLGU, FIDA C/MLGU,
Intensify research initiatives resistant, high research to put seed FA/COOP,
in Abaca key areas. yielding varieties , institutions fund for Abaca FIDA, ATI, DA-
& adaptable to Mis. varietal trials. BAR,
NOMIARC &
Or. Climatic
CMU
condition in 4
strategic sites
Lack of Abaca Designation of AT solely for Designation of 1 Mis. Or Mis. Mis. Limited AEW in PLGU-Prov’l. DA-PRDP & 3,200 3,200 3,200 DA-PRDP,
Technology Expert/ Abaca per LGU Abaca expert per Or. Or. the MLGU Agri. Office to PLGU, P/C/MLGU,
extension Worker in the LGU. Designate AEW C/MLGU NGA, etc
barangay to monitor at
the MLGU
level.
Limited FIDA Reconstitution of FIDA Establish Mis. Or Mis. Mis. Limited FIDA FIDA personnel FIDA 200,000 200,000 200,000 FIDA/PLGU
representative in the personnel assigned in the permanent FIDA Or. Or. personnel to collaborate
Province Province. office in the extension
province efforts with
PLGU
Lack of know-how on Upgrading/expansion Provision of Mis. Or Mis. Mis. Absence of FIDA & DA- DA-PRDP, 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA-PRDP,
standardized protocol for and/or establishment of Financial Or. Or. Financial PRDP to FIDA & DA- P/C/MLGU,
tissue culture production. tissue culture laboratory/ies Assistance to assistance to Agri provide funds BAR NGA, etc
(CMU & Malaybalay LGU existing 1 laboratories for for laboratory
Agri. Laboratory/MF LGU laboratory for the abaca equipments
propagation of propagation thru needed for
Abaca planting tissue culture. abaca research
material thru tissue
culture.
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Poor farm to market Upgrading/Concreting of farm to Construction of farm MLGUs/PLGUs do Setting up of DA-PRDP & DA-PRDP,
roads MLGUs/ CLGUs/ market roads for easy to market roads not have sufficient min. cost MLGU P/C/MLGU,
PLGUs do not have conveyance of agricultural financial capacity sharing to NGA, etc
sufficient capacity to commodities and services as to improve farm to enable LGUs to
construct and/or well as reduced transportation market finance
upgrade roads cost. counterpart
 funds for the
Project,
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province (from enterprise or infrastructure, # of farmers MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
the national & business enabling program, reached, if Players
regional VCA results) etc.) applicable
Concreting of 2 km DA-PRDP & 54,000 DA-PRDP,
Alipuaton FMR- MLGU P/C/MLGU,
Salay NGA, etc
Concreting of 1.5 40,500
Matampa FMR- km
Salay
Concreting of 1.80 48,000
Mimbule FMR- km
Salay
Concreting of 1.80 36,000
Mimbule to Saray km
FMR-Salay
Concreting of 10 km 200,000
Saray-Mimbalite-
Matampa FMR,
Salay
Concreting of 3.000 90,000
Looc-Tinagaan km
FMR, Salay
Concreting of 4.000 120,000
Alipuaton-Bunal km
FMR- Salay
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province (from (subprojects: enterprise or reached, if applicable Su pest & diseases) & other Funds
the national & infrastructure, business b/ Players
regional VCA results) enabling program, etc.) MF
O
Construction of Tibon- 15 km DA-PRDP & 580,000 DA-PRDP,
Tibon-Cabalawan- MLGU P/C/MLGU,
Mindulao-Tama FMR with NGA, etc
Bridge, Magsaysay
Construction of Mahayahay 11.530 311,001
– Katipunan-Gumabon- km
Tama Road, Magsaysay
Concreting of Consuelo- 7 km 189,000
Abunda –Tinaan FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of FMR Along 3 km 90,000
Purok 5-A & Purok 5-B of
Brgy. Pagawan,
Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 4 km 120,000
Sitio Donque, Upper
Malibog, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 5 km 150,000
Barangay Balintad,
Manticao
Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 54,000
Sambuyaan Road, km
Manticao
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province (from (subprojects: enterprise or reached, if applicable Su pest & diseases) & other Funds
the national & infrastructure, business b/ Players
regional VCA results) enabling program, etc.) MF
O
Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km DA-PRDP & 97,200 DA-PRDP,
Kolambugan Road, MLGU P/C/MLGU,
Manticao NGA, etc
Concreting of Mahayag- 3.50 94,500
Digkilaan, Manticao km
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao
Concreting Paniangan 0.70 18,900
Brgy. Road, Manticao km
Concreting Tuod Purok 7 0.50 13,500
, Manticao km
Concreting of Sagyawan 3.00 81,000
– Malibato, Manticao km
Concreting 3.5 km 94,500
PatagTalacogon Road,
Manticao
Concreting of Bal-ot 0.3 km 8,100
Road, Manticao
Concreting Pagawan- 3.00 81,000
Suminanap Road, km
Manticao

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province (from (subprojects: enterprise or reached, if applicable Su pest & diseases) & other Funds
the national & infrastructure, business b/ Players
regional VCA results) enabling program, etc.) MF
O
Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 DA-PRDP & 54,000 DA-PRDP,
Sambuyaan Road, km MLGU P/C/MLGU,
Manticao NGA, etc
 Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km 97,200
Kolambugan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao
Concreting 0.70 18,900
PanianganBrgy. Road, km
Manticao
Concreting TuodPurok 0.50 13,500
7 , Manticao km
Concreting of Balintad – 1.5 km 40,000
Victory Road, Manticao
Concreting of Magpait – 2.50 67,500
Camanga Road, km
Manticao
Concreting of Tuod- 3.00 81,000
Pagangon Road, km
Manticao

Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
in the Province (from (subprojects: enterprise or reached, if applicable Su pest & diseases) & other Funds
the national & infrastructure, business b/ Players
regional VCA results) enabling program, etc.) MF
O
Concreting of 3.00 DA-PRDP & 81,000 DA-PRDP,
Mahayahay – Kilablab, km MLGU P/C/MLGU,
Manticao NGA, etc

Concreting of 3.00 81,000

Mahayahay – Limonda, km
Manticao
Concreting of Donque 3.00 81,000
Hill, Manticao km
Concreting of Bagares 0.50 13,500
 St., Manticao km
Concreting of Sabuero 0.30 8,100
St., Manticao km
Concreting of Cementery 0.30 8,100
Road, Manticao km
Concreting of Mahayag- 3.50 94,500
Digkilaan, Manticao km
Concreting of Sagyawan 3.00 81,000
– Malibato, Manticao km
BangbangSidlakan, 3 km 81,000
Medina
San Vicente – Sidlakan, 2 km 54,000
Medina
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province (from the enterprise or infrastructure, # of farmers MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional business enabling program, reached, if Players
VCA results) etc.) applicable
Mimbolo – Natugod 3 km 81,000
FMR, Medina

San Isidro – Labas 3 km 81,000

Pagsama FMR,
Medina
Concreting of 6.5 km 174,000
Mananum Daan-
Kabolkabol FMR
with Bridge,
Medina
Road Concreting 7 km 189,000
at Upper Malibud
to Dinawehan
FMR, Gingoog
City
Road Concreting 4 km 108,000
Crossing San
Miguel to
Kalagonoy FMR,
Gingoog City
Concreting of 70.910 1,914,570
 Gingoog to km.
Claveria National
Road, Gingoog &
Claveria
Key Gap/ Constraint Brief Description of Potential Target Result/ MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
in VC Development in Intervention (subprojects: Outcome, including Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
the Province (from the enterprise or infrastructure, # of farmers MFO pest & diseases) & other Funds
national & regional business enabling program, reached, if Players
VCA results) etc.) applicable
Concreting of 8.600 232,200
Maanas- km.
Kibuguing Road,
Medina &
Gingoog City
Concreting of 7.000 189,000
Kabug-Sidlakan km.
Road, Medina &
Gingoog City
Concreting of San 5.500 148,500
Luis – Kibuging km.
Road, Gingoog
City
Concreting of San 5.500 148,500
Luis – Kibuging km.
Road, Gingoog
City

Concreting of 10 Km 240,000
Pangpangon-
Putting Balas-
Sibantang-
Mahayahay FMR
-Talisayan
Key Gap/ Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in the (subprojects: enterprise reached, if applicable Sub/ pest & diseases) & other Funds
Province (from the or infrastructure, MF Players
national & regional business enabling O
VCA results) program, etc.)
Concreting of Bugdang FMR, 2 km 54,000
Talisayan
 Concreting of Minlimaw- 5 km 135,000
Mahayag FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,000
Mandahilag-Macopa FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Poblacion – 2 km 54,000
Sindangan FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Pook- 7 km 189,000
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of San Jose – 6 km 162,000
Bugdang –Mahayag FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Mintabon – 5 km 135,000
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Sitio 12.3 246,000
Bangbang, Brgy. Buko- Km
Suarez FMR -Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Sumalag- 2.11 65,000
Calubo Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Salicapan- 2.9 km 78,300
Suarez FMR-Kinoguitan
Key Gap/ Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MF Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Adoption Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Potential Intervention including # of farmers O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Measure Lead Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in the (subprojects: enterprise reached, if applicable Su pest & diseases) & other Funds
Province (from the or infrastructure, b/ Players
national & regional business enabling MF
VCA results) program, etc.) O
Upgrading of Panabol-Buko 1.34 MLGUs, 36,180 MLGUs,
FMR-Kinoguitan km PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
PRDP PRDP
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.726 46,602
Poblacion FMR, Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Calubo-Kitotok 1.16 31,320
FMR, Kinoguitan
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 km 125,500
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad
FMR, Balingasag
Tuboran to Aluna FMR, 1.5 km 45,000
Naawan
Bangcalon to Tuboran FMR, 2.5 km 75,000
Naawan
 Linangkayan Highway to Don 4 km 120,000
Pedro FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Poblacion to 7 km 210,000
Patag FMR, Naawan
Mat-I Linugos to Tagbalogo 6 km 180,000
FMR, Naawan
Don Pedro to Digcamara 3 km 90,000
FMR, Naawan

Key Gap/ Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Potential Intervention including # of farmers Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Adoption Players & other 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in the (subprojects: enterprise reached, if applicable MFO pest & diseases) Measure Players Funds
Province (from the or infrastructure,
national & regional business enabling
VCA results) program, etc.)
Lapad to Tuboran Road, 2 km MLGUs, PLGU, 60,000 MLGUs,
Naawan DA, PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Purok 3 Mapulog to 3 km 90,000
Tagbalogo FMR,
Naawan
Digcamara Mapulog to 2 km 60,000
Cabilin Road, Naawan
Mapulog P2 to Banatihon 5.5 km 160,000
Road, Naawan
Concreting of Mapulog – 4 km 92,400
Tuboran FMR with Arc
bridges component,
Naawan
Concreting of Suwa-Bangko 4.58 137,400
Lubilan FMR, Naawan km
Concreting of Mat-I Lubilan 8.27 165,400
FMR, Naawan km
Lubilan to Mambuntan 3 km 90,000
Road, Naawan
Lubilan to Mahanggub 2 km 60,000
Road, Naawan
 Tagbalogo P8 to 4 km 120,000
Pasagdihon FMR, Naawan
Key Gap/ Brief Description of Target Result/ Outcome, MFO/ Target Areas to be covered Major Risks Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Proposed Rank
Constraint in VC Potential Intervention including # of farmers Sub/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 (Climate geologic, Adoption Players & other 2023 2024 2025 2026 Source of
Development in the (subprojects: enterprise reached, if applicable MFO pest & diseases) Measure Players Funds
Province (from the or infrastructure,
national & regional business enabling
VCA results) program, etc.)
Mat-I to Pasagdihon FMR, 3 km MLGUs, PLGU, 90,000 MLGUs,
Naawan DA, PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Centro Don Pedro to 2.309 60,500
Macawa Road, Naawan km
Don Pedro to Linangkayan 2 km 60,000
FMR, Naawan
Mapulog P6 to P8 FMR, 5 KM 150,000
Naawan
Maputi P8 to P12 FMR, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Maputi to Tuboran, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Commodity Value Chain 5: COCONUT
3.5 Commodity Value Chain 5: Coconut

3.5.1 Commodity Profile: Coconut

Coconut also known as “the tree of life”, is one of the most important crops in the Philippines. It is considered a major
export, Contributing 3.6% of the country’s gross value-added (GVA) in agriculture, next to banana corn, rice. Indeed the
country remains to be a top producer and exporter of coconut worldwide (PSA 2019, Lapina and Andal 2017).

To date, it is still considered as one of the pillars of our national economy contributing an average of 91.4 billion pesos
export earnings (2014-2018) or equivalent to 25% of the total agricultural exports in 2018. However, its gross value
added to our gross domestic product is only 5% (BOC, 2018). Today, 2.5 million coconut farmers sourced their
livelihood in about 3.6 million hectares of coconut farms in the country. Coconut production constitutes one of the four
major sector of Philippine Agriculture, other than rice corn and sugar.

Coconut products are among the Top 10 export products of the region contributing to around US $453.75 Million or
67% of our products exported. These are Oleochemicals, Crude Coconut Oil, Activated Carbon, Copra solvent/
Expeller Cake, and desiccated coconut. Comprising the other 33% of exports are pineapple products, sintered ore,
abaca, and kiln-dried lumber. (BOC-X, 2019). About 85% of the coconut production is export in the form of copra, coco
sugar, desiccated coconut and coco fifer.

Region 10 (Northern Mindanao) called the gateway to the rest of the Philippines, and since it has an international
container port- a direct gateway to the world. The region have ample power supply, Fewer typhoons, and generally
stable peace and order situation, it has 6 major oil Mills Operating within the region, two existing Desiccating Plants and
another 1 just breaking ground in Plaridel, Misamis Occidental, plus 37 other coconut products/by-products processors
registered with PCA.

Region 10 (Northern Mindanao) has about 304,046 hectares of coconut 2022. Misamis Oriental is the highest coconut
producing in the Region with 104,409 hectares or 34% of the total coconut area in the Region.

Area Planted/Harvested in the Philippines it increases from 2028 to 2019, it continuously decreases from 2020 to 2022.
This is because some coconut trees were damage during calamities and change of crops. There was no planting in
Northern Mindanao from CY2018 to 2021 and increases in 2022. For Misamis Oriental there was no planting from 2018
to 2022 thus, area harvested from 2018 to 2022 was the same.

Table 3.5.1 Area Planted/Harvested of Coconut in the Country/ Northern Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental

YEARS
Particulars 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
National 3,628,134.38 3,651,873.03 3,651,288.76 3,646,911.57 3,604,205.71
Northern 303,981.00 303,981 303,981.00 303,981.00 304,046.00
Mindanao
Misamis Oriental 104,409 104,409 104,409.00 104,409.00 104,409.00
PSA-2022

Production performance, in the Philippines from 2018 to 2019 was increasing it slightly decreases in 2020 and
continuously increases from 2020 to 2022. In Northern Mindanao and Misamis Oriental production was increasing from
2018 to 2022. The increase was brought about by the increase in average yield.

Table 3.5.2 Production Performance of the Country/ Northern Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental

YEARS
Particulars 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
National 14,726,,165.43, 14,765,057.06 14,490,922.69 14,717,293.91 14,931,158.30
Northern 1,793,487.90 1,823,886 1,858,779 1,864,904.24 1,872,149.94
Mindanao
Misamis Oriental 539,804 542,070.79 568,485.70 568,693.90 578,115.17
PSA 2022
 Average yield per hectare in the Philippines was slightly decreasing from 2018 to 2020 and increases from 2021 to
2022. In Northern Mindanao average yield was increasing from 2018 to 2022. While in Misamis Oriental average yield
from 2018 to 2020 was increasing and was stable or no increase or decrease from 2020 to 2022.

Table 3.5.3 Average Production of Coconut in the Philippines/ Northern Mindanao/ Misamis oriental

YEARS
Particulars 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
National 4.06 4.04 3.97 4.06 4.14
Northern 5.90 6.00 6.11 6.14 6.15
Mindanao
Misamis Oriental 5.17 5.19 5.44 5.44 5.44
PSA 2022

Coconut is the top most commodities in Misamis Oriental. The highest producer was Gingoog City with an area
covered of 32,520 hectares. The lowest producer of coconut is Claveria the only land lock upland area in the province.
Municipalities along the sea shore are coconut base area and most suitable for coconut crops.

Table 3.5.4 Population, Poverty Incidence, Area Harvested, No. of Farmers Engaged, Production CY2022
And Expansion Area in Coconut of Misamis Oriental by Municipality/City

Existing Expansion
Municipality Population Poverty No. of Area Production Area
Incidence Farmers Harvested (Mt.) (HA)
Magsaysay 36,803 25.8 5,316 5,316 31,364.40 181
Gingoog City 136,698 22.7 32,520 32,520 186,990.01 519
Medina 35,612 18.2 6,929 6,929 37,693.76 38
Talisayan 25,761 19.9 5,718 5,718 31,105.92 3
Balingoan 11,020 18.5 2,186 2,186 11,891.84 19
Kinoguitan 14,091 17.1 2,728 2,728 14,840.32 28
Sugbongcogon 9,764 17.9 1,638 1,638 8,910.72 14
Binuangan 7,441 17.1 1,354 1,354 7,365.70 200
Salay 29,998 17.3 4,613 4,613 25,094.72
Lagonglong 24,190 18.9 3,268 3,268 17,777.92 10
Balingasag 74,385 20.1 6,148 6,148 33,445.12 36
Jasaan 57,055 16.7 3,943 3,943 21,449.92 18
Villanueva 40,419 16.0 258 258 1,403.52 23
Claveria 52,478 22.1 65 65 353.60 35
Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 1,296 1,296 7,050.24 36
Opol 66,327 12.7 1,767 1,767 9,612.48 128
El Salvador 58,771 13.3 1,642 1,642 8,432.48 15
Alubijid 32,163 14.9 3,295 3,295 17,924.80 93
Laguindingan 26,363 15.2 2,100 2,100 11,424.00 56
Gitagum 17,920 15.8 1,219 1,219 6,631.36 4
Libertad 12,948 17.9 1,739 1,739 9,460.16 66
Initao 33,902 17.0 3,911 3,911 21,275.82 46
Naawan 22,444 16.7 3,545 3,545 19,241.80 78
Manticao 29,469 17.7 4,212 4,212 21,060.00 24
Lugait 20,559 14.1 2,999 2,999 16,314.56 10
Misamis Oriental
957,900 21.4 104,409 104,409.00 578,115.17 1,680.00
Figure 3.5.1 Commodity Map of Coconut in Misamis Oriental
Coconut Supply and Value Chain Analysis

Figure 3.5.2 shows the value chain analysis in Region X all the key players of coconut industry in the Region X, from
input segment to the end users. There are different products produced namely copra, whole nut, charcoal, buko, hust
and sap. Among the coconut product that has complete chain are copra, whole nuts, charcoal and buko. Hust and sap
has no intermediary.
 Figure 3.5.2 Coconut Value Chain in Region X

Coconut meat will be process into copra products by coconut growers traded to copra traders namely, Granex Export
Mfg. Corp., World Venture Inc., OSANCO Milling Corp., Limketkai Mkg. Corp., WILMAR and Phil GLOBAL. Copra is
further process into coconut crude oil and copra meal which has available export market.
 Figure 3.5.3 Value Chin Analysis of Coconut Meat in Region X

Young nuts /buko from coconut growers will be channel to buko consolidators which will be sold out to buko juice
processor, in the province the biggest buko processor is AXELUM Resources Corp. in Medina and to buko vendors
both is just for domestic market.

Figure 3.5.4 Value Chain Analysis of Young Meat in Region X

Coconut shell from the farmers will be channel to coconut shell buyers which will be process into granulated
charcoal and activated carbon which has great foreign market.
 Figure 3.5.5 Value Chain Analysis of Coconut Shell in Region X

Coco husk can be process into coir fiber, geonets and coco peat. Base on the Value Chain Analysis results has
available buyers that process into coir fiber and geonets, with available domestic market.

Figure 3.5.6 Value Chain Analysis of Coconut Husk in Region X

Value Chain Analysis of coconut sap, from coconut farmers coco sap syrup is channel to coco sap syrup buyers
processor of coco sugar and coco sauce which has both domestic and export buyers.
Coconut sugar (also known as coco sugar, coconut palm sugar or coco sap sugar) is produced from the sap of cut
flower buds of the coconut palm. Coconut sugar has been used as traditional sweetener for thousands of years in the
South and South-East Asian regions where the coconut palm is in abundant supply. The world's largest producers of
coconuts are the Philippines and Indonesia.
Coconut sugar comes in crystal or granule from block or liquid. The sap is translucent and is about 80% water. As the
water evaporates, it starts to transform into a thick syrup-like substance known as “toddy”. From this form, it further
reduced to crystal, block or soft paste form or it remains in this form. Essentially, coconut sugar’s form depends on the
moisture content of the toddy.

Tapping of coconut tree blossoms for the sap resembles the practice of tapping maple trees for maple syrup.
Containers made out of hollow bamboo tubes are used to collect the sap. The freshly gathered sap is oyster white in
color and has a nearly neutral ph. The production process of coco sugar involves a natural process of heat
evaporation to convert liquid sap to solid form of sugar granules. Eight liters of coconut sap yield one kilo of coco
sugar when cooked.

Coconut sugar consists primarily of sucrose (containing glucose and fructose). Table 3.5.1.5 shows a comparison of
sugar content of coco sap sugar and refined cane sugar nutrient content.

Table 3.5.5 Comparison of Coco Sugar and Refined Cane Sugar Nutrient Composition

COMPOSITION (%)
TYPE OF SUCROSE FRUCTOSE GLOCUSE MACRO MICRO NUTRIENTS
SUGAR NUTRIENTS
Coco Sap 84.98 2.90 2.00 1.89 0.005
Sugar
Refined Cane 99.70 0.02 0.003
Sugar

The classification of Glycemic Index of food is as follows:75-100 GI (High), 56-74 GI (Medium), 55 or < (Low). The
Glycemic Index of coconut sugar was reported by the Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA) to be 35 and by that
measure it is classified as a low glycemic index food. Thus, coconut sugar has gained popularity as a health food and
among people with diabetes because of its low glycemic index. Coconut sugar can be used as a sugar substitute for
diabetics but it should be treated no differently than table sugar. It is considered to be healthier than refined white
sugar (60) and brown sugar (64). It can be used as a 1:1 sugar substitute for coffee, tea, baking, and cooking.

Coconut sugar has high mineral content, being a rich source of potassium, magnesium, zinc and iron. It also contains
Vitamin B1, B2, B3 and B6. When compared to brown sugar, coconut sugar has 18 times the potassium, 30 times the
phosphorus and over 10 times the amount of Zinc. The large amount of K and P can be explained by the way coconut
sugar is tapped from the inflorescences of the tree. Likewise, coconut sap, from which coconut sugar is derived,
contains 17 amino acids. The amino acid which has the highest content in coconut sap is Glutamine.

Coconut sap produces a multitude of other delicious products such as coconut vinegar, coconut amino seasoning
sauce, coconut nectar, and coconut crystals. Other allied products from coco sap are coco sap syrup, coco sap
spread, coco sap drink.
 Figure 3.5.7 Value Chain Analysis of Coconut Sap Region X

Income generated of farmer in 1 hectare who will process his coconut into copra. The farmer can produced copra,
coco shell and coconut husk. In 1 hectare coconut farm a farmers can inquired Php15,000.00 expenses and the total
gross income is P34,055.00 thus, net income is Php19,055.00 per cropping. An annual net income of Php57,165.00.
A monthly income of Php4,763.75 below poverty level.

Figure 3.5.8 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut Farm

For farmer who engaged in semi-integrated processing that will produced copra, shell will be process into
charcoal, husk process into coir fiber, coco peat and coco water into vinegar. In 1 hectare his/her total
investment is Php15,354.00 and his/her gross income will Php117,517.00. So His/her net income P102,163.00
 per cropping. Hence, in one year his/ her total net income will be P306,489.00 or Php 25,540.75 monthly income

which is above poverty level of Php15,000.00.

.
Figure 5.5.9 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut Farm Semi-
Integrated Processing Enterprise

For a farmer with 1 hectare of coconut farmer who fertilize and well manage farm and semi-processing, total expenses
is Php15,505.00 and total gross income of Php402,031.00. The income derived from copra, coco shell charcoal, coir
fiber, coco peat, coco water vinegar and coco sugar. Hence, net income of Php386,526.00 or monthly income of
Php32,210.50.

Figure 3.5.10 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut Farm with
Fertilizer & Well Manage Farm Plus Engaged in Semi-Processing

Income generated from 1 hectare coconut farm of other coconut stakeholder, farmer trader expenses
Php2,400.00 gross income of P29,500.00 and net income of Php 27,100. Vendor with an expenses of
Php88,500.00 has an gross income of Php147,500.00 with a net income of Php59,000.00. For a Processor with
 an expenses of Php59,000.00 will have a gross income of Php247,800.00 with a net income of Php188,800.00.
Among the 3 stakeholders vendor needs bigger expenses and the highest net income is from the processor.

Figure 3.5.11 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare of Coconut

Farm for Young Coconuts

For the following key player of coco industry that will engaged in 1 hectare the total annual income of farmers if his/her
farm if rented is Php90,000.00, for coco sap farmer will Php540,000.00 and for coco sugar will be Php1,125,000.00.
The highest will be the coco sugar processor.

Figure 3.5.12 VCA Income Generated from 1 Hectare Coconut farm for
Coco Sugar Industry

Comparative income of farmer for 1 hectare coconut farm a farmer who engaged in selling whole nuts is lesser
income compared with traders of husked nuts and husks product a difference of Php10,020.00 over that of farmers
just selling whole nuts. For Farmer who is engaged in copra, coco water vinegar, coir fiber, coco peat and shell
charcoal is much bigger a total income of P117,517.
 Figure 3.5.13 VCA Income Generated –From 1 Hectare Coconut Farm

3.5.2 Expanded Vulnerability Suitability Analysis (EVSA): Coconut

The Expanded Vulnerability Sustainability Assessment (EVSA) for Abaca in Misamis Oriental include the following
parameters, 50% soil suitability, 10% area planted, 10% production volume of the commodity, 10% number of farmers
engaged in coconut, 15% poverty incidence and 5% population in determining the ranking of areas where the
commodity is most suitable to be propagated and its value chain developed. Areas with 0.400 new composite index is
most suitable for coconut production.

Result of the EVSA computation for coconut commodity is presented in the Table 3.5.2.1 recorded the area suitable for
coconut production. Generally the province is suitable for coconut production and it is the top commodity of the
province. So base on the result of EVSA computation the top five (5) municipalities/ cities suitable for coconut
production are Gingoog City, Balingasag, Laguindingan, Magsaysay and Initao. The less suitable municipality/ city for
coconut production are Sugbongcogon, Balingoan, Claveria and Binuangan.

3.5.6 Table Showing the Results of EVSA for Coconut of Misamis Oriental

Poverty Area Farmers Volume Old Old New New

Municipality Population Incidence Planted Involved Production Composite Rank Composite Rank
Index
GINGOOG CITY 136698 22.1 33039 32520 186990 0.4659 25 0.71144 1
MAGSAYSAY 36803 25.8 5497 5316 31364.4 0.5736 15 0.50002 2
LAGUINDINGAN 26363 15.2 2156 2100 11424 0.76 1 0.49711 3
BALINGASAG 74385 20.1 6184 6148 33445.12 0.5924 12 0.49579 4
INITAO 33902 17 3957 3911 21275.82 0.6763 4 0.48478 5
LIBERTAD 12948 19.9 1805 1739 9460.16 0.6766 3 0.47461 6
TAGOLOAN 80319 16.8 1332 1296 7050.24 0.6582 6 0.46794 7
GITAGUM 17920 15.8 1223 1219 6631.36 0.6967 2 0.45776 8
ALUBIJID 32163 14.9 3388 3295 17294.8 0.6539 7 0.45498 9
TALISAYAN 25761 19.9 5721 5718 31105.92 0.5475 19 0.45041 10
VILLANUEVA 40419 16 281 258 1403.52 0.6731 5 0.44674 11
MEDINA 35612 18.2 6967 6929 37693.76 0.5237 22 0.44325 12
JASAAN 57055 16.7 3961 3943 21449.92 0.5763 14 0.4417 13
NAAWAN 22444 16.7 3623 3545 19241.8 0.603 10 0.43896 14
MANTICAO 29469 17.7 4236 4212 21060 0.5719 16 0.43667 15
LUGAIT 20559 14.1 3009 2999 16314.56 0.6201 8 0.42661 16
 EL SALVADOR 58771 13.3 1657 1642 8432.48 0.6188 9 0.42281 17
SALAY 136698 22.1 33039 32520 186990 0.4659 25 0.71144 18
Poverty Area Farmers Volume Old Old New New
Municipality Population Incidence Planted Involved Production Composite Rank Composite Rank
Index
LAGONGLONG 24190 18.9 3278 3268 17777.92 0.5212 23 0.40881 19
KINOGUITAN 14091 17.1 2756 2728 14840.32 0.556 17 0.40724 20
OPOL 66327 12.7 1895 1767 9612.48 0.5852 13 0.40701 21
SUGBONGCOGON 9764 17.9 1652 1638 8910.72 0.5483 18 0.3966 22
BALINGOAN 11020 18.5 2205 2186 11891.84 0.5212 23 0.39194 23
BINUANGAN 7441 17.1 1554 1354 7365.7 0.5429 20 0.38639 24
CLAVERIA 52478 22.1 100 65 353.6 0.4747 24 0.38573 25

3.5.2.1 Figure EVSA Map for Coconut of Misamis Oriental

3.5.3 Coconut Commodity Strategic Development Strategic Directions and Investment Plan
Investment Plan

Regional Coconut production can cater only to about 39% of raw material needs of the existing traditional end-users
operating in Northern Mindanao. So, the industry must focus on increasing the coconut production to become more
self-sufficient since other regions are also developing their coconut industry. Production to become more self-sufficient
other regions are also developing their coconut industry.

Misamis Oriental occupies 35% of the total coconut area in Northern Mindanao and it is the top most priority
commodities of the province. With the existing coconut farm majority are senile thus, there is a need to focus on
massive planting of Open Pollinated varieties (OPV) and hybrid coconuts in high density planting design.

Also, there is a need to focus more on gross value adding in the farmer’s level to enhance farmers income if their final
traditional product is copra and or whole/de-husked nuts, and encourage group direct marketing and group farming
operations.

Equally important is the need to configure ways to augment coconut farmer’s income by encouraging them to adopt
production of non-traditional products.

Coconut Industry Strategic Development Directions

To increase regional coconut productivity by adopting massive coconut fertilization using salt; utilization of high-density
planting; planting of hybrids; mulching using coco peat; and establishment of local coconut seed farms for future quality
seed material.

To capacitate the coconut farmers to become coco-entrepreneur’s by adopting more value adding and achieve high
productivity, profitability and sustainability in their farming operations with end result of greatly augmenting their income.
Empower the coconut farmers’ organizations (SCFO & Coop) towards effective and efficient management of business
to achieve high and sustained profitability for all their members.

To establish a regional coconut Research and Development System with strong linkages with local governments, SUCs
and Industry players, geared towards pro-active research development, improvement and transfer of new and existing
technologies beneficial to all sectors.

To further empower the PCA to effectively provide support/assistance and direction toward efficiency, profitability and
sustainability of each level in the supply chain of the coconut production, processing/manufacturing and marketing by
aligning itself to relevant mandates/directives and or laws.

Increase productivity from 4.99 Mt. to 6 Mt. / hectare / year thru establishment of climate change resilient technology,
organic fertilization and rehabilitation

To established a processing facilities and infrastructure which adhered to climate change and environmentally friendly
facilities. More efforts will be focus for more investment to coconut industry.
 3.5.4 PCIP Gap Matrix Coconut Value Chain in Misamis Oriental

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in VC Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & Development in the Potential Intervention Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 & other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
Services Province MFO
INPUT PROVISION
Limited Supply Strengthen the local Develop more On-Farm Gingoog Jasaan/ Drought, Establish drainage PCA, MLGUs, 1,000 1,500 PCA, MLGUs,
of good quality seed nut/ seedlings Hybridization sites. City / Alubijid/ Flood, canal/flood control, PLGU, DA- PLGU, DA-
planting suppliers to ensure Balingasag Naawan Tropical slope protection, PRDP PRDP
materials of good quality planting Storm, Implement
OPV and Hybrid Materials. Establish Accredit local seed Gingoog Jasaan/ earthquake registration for crops PCA, MLGUs, 100 100 PCA, MLGUs,
seedlings more On-Farm nut/ seedling City / Alubijid/ insurance PLGU, DA PLGU, DA
Hybridization sites. suppliers Balingasag Naawan
Establishment of Seed Coordinate MLGU to Magsaysay Talisay Sugb PCA, MLGUs, 6,500 3,500 3,500 PCA, MLGUs,
farm: one (1) site per provide areas for seed /Gingoog/ an/ ongc PLGU, DA- PLGU, DA-
municipality at least 3-5 farm Medina/ Balingo ogon PRDP PRDP
hectares to supply the Salay/ an/ /
potential areas within Lagonglong Kinoguit Binu
the municipality /Balingasag an/ anga
/ Jasaan/ Laguind n/
Villanueva/ ingan/ Liber
Tagoloan/ Gitagu tad/
Opol/ El m/ Initao
Salvador/ Mantica /
Alubijid/ o/Lugait Clav
Naawan eria
Insufficient raw Encourage farmers to Increase productivity Magsaysay Talisay Sugb Clave PCA, MLGUs, 5,500 3,500 2,000 1,500 PCA, MLGUs,
materials to engage diversified through utilization of /Gingoog/ an/ ongc ria/ PLGU, DA PLGU, DA
supply the oil farming especially those high-density planting Medina/ Balingo ogon Villan
mills operating farmers who practiced Salay/ an/ / ueva/
in Northern mono-cropping. Lagonglong Kinoguit Binu Tagol
Mindanao /Balingasag an/ anga oan
/ Jasaan/ Laguind n/
Opol/ El ingan/ Liber
Salvador/ Gitagu tad/
Alubijid/ m/ Initao
Naawan Mantica
o/Lugait
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Farmer’s Non- Educate farmers to Increase provincial Magsaysay Talisay Sugb Clave PCA, MLGUs, 300 250 250 200 PCA, MLGUs,
adaption of adapt non-traditional coconut productivity, /Gingoog/ an/ ongc ria/ PLGU, DA PLGU, DA
fertilization and farming; utilization of profitability, sustainability Medina/ Balingo ogon Villan
high-density high density planting, and augmenting farmers Salay/ an/ / ueva/
planting planting of hybrids, income Lagonglong Kinoguit Binu Tagol
mulching using coco /Balingasag an/ anga oan
peat and coconut / Jasaan/ Laguind n/
fertilization Opol/ El ingan/ Liber
Salvador/ Gitagu tad/
Alubijid/ m/ Initao
Naawan Mantica
o/Lugait
Training on coconut Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Mis. PCA, MLGUs, PCA, MLGUs,
pests and diseases Or. Or. PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
ATI ATI.
Massive coconut Magsaysay Talisay Sugb Clave PCA, MLGUs, 3,300 2,100 1,200 900 PCA, MLGUs,
planting, massive /Gingoog/ an/ ongc ria/ PLGU, DA PLGU, DA
fertilization of bearing Medina/ Balingo ogon Villan
trees Salay/ an/ / ueva/
Lagonglong Kinoguit Binu Tagol
/Balingasag an/ anga oan
/ Jasaan/ Laguind n/
Opol/ El ingan/ Liber
Salvador/ Gitagu tad/
Alubijid/ m/ Initao
Naawan Mantica
o/Lugait
No dropping and Clustering approach 1 Magsaysay Talisay Sugb Clave PCA, MLGUs, 22,000 14,000 8,000 6,000 PCA, MLGUs,
collection points in per respective mun.by /Gingoog/ an/ ongc ria/ PLGU, DA PLGU, DA
rural areas and/ or integrating it with their Medina/ Balingo ogon Villan
inefficient coconut Salay/ an/ / ueva/
waste mgt. Program thru
husk collection Lagonglong Kinoguit Binu Tagol
an ordinance thus, brgy. /Balingasag an/ anga oan
halls/ centers can be / Jasaan/ Laguind n/
their collection and Opol/ El ingan/ Liber
 dropping point thru Salvador/ Gitagu tad/
provision of hauling Alubijid/ m/ Initao
trucks Naawan Mantica
o/Lugait
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Inefficient system or Skills Training offered by Mis. Or. Mis. Or Mis Mis. PCA, MLGUs, 500 500 500 500 PCA, MLGUs,
way of de-husking NGAs and notable Or. Or. PLGU, DA- PLGU, DA, -
(separating meat players of the industry PRDP/ ATI PRDP/ ATI
from husks) 1 training/ year
Inaccessible farms/ Good access roads In ability of Pass ordinance to
poor road conditions and/or barangay roads LGUs to collect tool fees for
leads to high even unpaved as long as maintain the Maintenance
transportation costs it is passable by big roads
for collecting or trucks can reduce
delivery of coconut transportation costs.
husks.
Upgrading/Rehabilitation/
Financial capabilities Concreting of FMR to
of SOME PLGUs and support the production
MLGUs to construct/ area and access road to
develop access the market
roads. Concreting of Katipunan- 4.000 km. 108,000
Gumabon Road,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Talisay- 4.000 km. 108,000
Mahayahay Road,
Gingoog City &
Magsaysay
Rehabilitation of 11.530 311,001
Mahayahay-Katipunan- Km
Gumabon-Tama Road,
Magsaysay
Construction of Kandiis- 4.000 108,000
Tibon-Tibon Road, km
Magsaysay
Construction of 6.57 km 177,390
Damayuhan- Kauswagan
 Road, Magsaysay
Upgrading of Cabantian- 3.000 81,000
Tulang Road, km
Magsaysay

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Rehabilitation of 7.000 PCA, MLGUs, 189,000 PCA,
Bonifacio –Mindulao km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Road, Magsaysay PRDP PLGU, DA,
Construction of 2 km 54,000 PRDP
Mindulao-Tama Road,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Talisay- 4.000 km. 108,000
Mahayahay Road,
Gingoog City &
Magsaysay
Concreting of Tibon- 15 km 580,000
Tibon-Cabalawan –
Mindulao –Tama FMR
with brige, Magsaysay
Concreting of Kibungsod – 2 km 54,000
Cabantian Circuferencial
Road, Magsaysay
Construction of Artadi-San 5 km 150,000
Vicente FMR, Magsaysay
Construction of Kibungsod- 4 km 120,000
Cabubuhan –Villa Felipa
FMR, Magsaysay
Concreting of Consuelo- 7 km 189,000
Abunda-Tinaan FMR,
Magsaysay
Construction of Consuelo 6 km 162,000
(Kimaya) Pag-asa FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Cabubuhan 2.5 km 67,500
(Lilo) Kibungsod FMR,
Magsaysay
11 km 297,000
Road Concreting at
 Upper Malibud to
Dinawihan , Ginoog City
Concreting of Gingoog to 70.910 1,914,570
Claveria National Road, km.
Gingoog & Claveria
Concreting of Maanas- 8.600 km. 232,200
Kibuguing Road, Medina
& Gingoog City

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Kabug- 7.000 PCA, MLGUs, 189,000 PCA,
Sidlakan Road, Medina & km. PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Gingoog City PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Concreting of San Luis – 5.500 148,500
Kibuging Road, Gingoog km.
City
Bulwa – Mananum Bag-o 81,000
FMR, Medina 3 Km
Pahindong – Macopa 81,000
FMR, Medina 3 km
Bangbang Sidlakan 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
Tupon- Maanas-San 81,000
Vicente-Maanyag FMR, 3 km
Medina
San Vicente – Kiiwang 2 Km 54,000
FMR, Medina
San Vicente – Sidlakan 2 Km 54,000
FMR, Medina
San Jose – Hollywood 108,000
4KM
FMR , Medina
 South Poblacion FMR , 54,000
2 Km
Medina
Mananum Bag-o - 81,000
3 Km
Baluarte FMR, Medina
Portulin – Dig-aguyan 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
Gasa - Hangaron FMR, 81,000
3 KM
Medina

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Manamum 6.5 km PCA, MLGUs, 174,000 PCA,
–Daan-Kabol-Kabol FMR PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
with Bridge - Medina PRDP PLGU, DA,
San Roque FMR, Medina 3 KM 81,000 PRDP
Mimbolo - Natugod FMR, 81,000
3 Km
Medina
Maanas – San Vicente 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
San Isidro – Labas 81,000
3 Km
Pagsama FMR , Medina
Concreting of 10 km 240,000
Pangpangon-Putting
Balas-Sibantang-
Mahayahay FMR -
Talisayan
Concreting of Bugdang 2 km 54,000
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Minlimaw- 5 km 135,000
Mahayag FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,00
Mandahilag-Macopa FMR, 0
Talisayan
 Concreting of Poblacion – 2 km 54,000
Sindangan FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Pook- 7 km 189,00
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan 0
Concreting of San Jose – 6 km 162,00
Bugdang –Mahayag FMR, 0
Talisayan
Concreting of Mintabon – 5 km 135,000
Sibantang FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Sitio 12.3 km 246,000
Bangbang, Brgy. Buko-
Suarez FMR -Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Panabol- 1.34 km 36,180
Buko FMR-Kinoguitan
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.726 PCA, MLGUs, 46,602 PCA,
Poblacion FMR, km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
kinoguitan PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Upgrading of Sumalag- 2.11 56,970
Calubo, Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Salicapan- 2.9 78,300
Suarez FMR-Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Calabo- 1.16 31,320
Kitotok FMR, Kinoguitan km
Concreting and 3 km 100,000
Rehabilitation of FMR of
Kitamban – Valdeconcha
– Mosangot Road,
Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1 km 30,000
Valdeconcha-Silad-
Ampianga FMR,
Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1km 30,000
Kitambis – Kidalayon-
Membuahan FMR,
 Binuangan
Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000
(Kumakaykay-
Valdechoncha-
Kitamban), Binuangan
Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000
(Gantangun-Kitambis),
Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini – 1km 30,000
Tinagaan Road,
Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini- 1km 30,000
Tinigaan Road,
Binuangan

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Ran
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub & other Players Funds k
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO
Concreting of Mimbule to 1.80 km PCA, MLGUs, 48,000 PCA,
Saray FMR-Salay PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Concreting of 10 Km 200,000
Kalongonan Kandal
FMR, Salay
Concreting of Alipuaton- 4 km 120,,000
Bunal FMR- Salay
Concreting of Matampa 1.5 km 40,500
FMR-Salay
Concreting of Saray- 10 km 200,000
Mimbalite –Matampa
FMR, Salay
Construction of FMR with 0.75 km 54,000
4 Barrels Box Cluvert at
Salay River II, Salay
Concreting of Looc- 3.000 90,000
Tinagaan FMR, Salay km
Concreting of Mananum- 1.6 km 43,961
 Claveria FMR with
Bridge, Balingasag
Concreting of Kibalua 4.3 km 116,500
FMR, Balingasag
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 125,500
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad km
FMR, Balingasag
Upgrading of Domagooc 4.000 108,000
to SitioPatrocenio FMR, km.
Jasaan
Upgrading of Solana to 3.000 81,000
Sitio Looc FMR, Jasaan km.
Upgrading of SitioKatu- 5.000 135,000
an, Natubo – Kimamaon km.
Kimaya FMR, Jasaan
Upgrading of San 6.000 162,000
Antonio to Sitio Cogon km.
FMR, Jasaan
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Ran
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub & other Players Funds k
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO
Concreting of San 16 PCA, MLGUs, 432,000 PCA,
Nicolas-Upper Antonio- km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
IS-Cruz Road, Jasaan PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Concreting of Sitio Bato, 4 km 320,000
Brgy kimaya- Villanueva
Upgrading of Dawayan-
3.745 101,126
Lokong-Crossing
4 km
Mambuaya FMR,
Villanueva
Construction of FMR with 0.61 km 85,000
slope Protection and
sheet piles (300 meters
long) in Sitio Macusi,
Brgy. Kimaya, Villanueva
Concreting of 4 km 320,000
Cebukawon FMR,
Tagoloan
 Concreting of Nasalaban 2 km 54,000
–Subaya FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of 4 km 120,000
Natumolan-Maribojoc
FMR, Tagolan
Rehabilitation of Rosario 3 km 90,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Danao 5 km 150,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Rosario – 2.2 176,000
Comocomo FMR, km
Tagoloan
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) 10km 300,000
Tugasnon-San Francisco
El Salvador
Concreting of 10 km 300,000
Kalongonan-Kandal
FMR, El Salvador

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Lacapon-Tugasnon Sitio 5.62 PCA, MLGUs, 168,600 PCA,
Bato (Hot Spring) km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Seriwagan Sungay PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Road, Alubijid
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) – 10km 300,000
Tugasnon- San
Fransisco de Asis, El
Salvador
Spring Road, 0.79 km 21,330
Laguindingan
Upgrading of Madrid- 43,956
1.628
Lapad Road ,
km
Laguindingan
Upgrading of Lapad – 2.985 80,595
Sikiton Road-Lourdes km
 Brgy. Road ,
Laguindingan
Upgrading of Lapad- 13,500
Aromahon-Nob Road, 0.5 km
Laguindingan
Salcedo Hills Drive Road 27,000
1 km
, Laguindingan
Sitio Eba Road , 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Tangke Road, 10,800
0.4 km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot Spring Road, 26,460
0.98 km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot Alongan Road, 35,100
1.3 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Pagangon Road, 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Clarin Road , 75,600
2.8 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Pitogo Road, 25,920
0.96 km
Laguindingan

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Liberty Anosa-Liberty PCA, MLGUs, PCA,
Elem. Sch. Road, 3 km PLGU, DA, 81,000 MLGUs,
Laguindingan PRDP PLGU, DA,
Sinai-Aput Road, 40,500 PRDP
1.5 km
Laguindinga
Sambulawan Bajuyo 67,500
2.5 km
Road, Laguindingan
JKT. National Highway to 54,000
Virgin as Fatima, 2 km
Laguindingan
Sambulawan Tambo 39,744
1.472 km
Road, Laguindingan
Sambulawan Tambo 1.25 km 33,750
 Road, Laguindingan
Liberty Pitogo Road, 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Liberty Gasi Road , 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Liberty Campo Road, 3.15 85,050
Laguindingan km
Mauswagon Clarin Road, 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Mauswagon Rajal Road, 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Concreting of Aromahon 37,800
Lapad Road, 1.4 km
Laguindingan
Concreting of Aromahon- 51,300
Tiano Road, 1.9 km
Laguindingan
Gasi-Sinai Road, 16,200
0.6, km
Laguindingan
Gasi-Pipian-Pagangon 23,400
1.2, km
Road, Laguindingan
Sinai-Gasi Road with 40,500
1.5 km
Bridge, Laguindingan

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Pavement 700 PCA, MLGUs, 8,700 PCA,
Road (Prk 4) to Existing meter PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
 Concrete Pavement (Prk PRDP PLGU,
6), Pob. Gitagum DA,
Construction / Concreting 7,600 PRDP
800
of FMR P3A Talao-to
meter
C.P. Gracia, Gitagum
Upgrading of Puga-an – 48,600
1.8 km
Bitaugon FMR , Libertad
Concreting of Upper 135,000
Talacogon-Aya-aya 5 km
Road, Lugait
Concreting of 135,000
Calangahan –Upper 5 km
Talacogon Road, Lugait
Concreting of Aya-aya to 81,000
3 km
Sitio Tamao Road, Lugait
Upgrading of
Gimampang-Aluna- 3.02 km 81,540
Casilihon FMR- Initao
Upgrading/Concreting of
6 km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR,
Initao
Upgrading of Sapong- 5.51
km 148,770
Mamiguis-Bansilang
FMR-Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 6 Km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR,
Initao
Upgrading/ Concreting of 7 km 189,000
Sinalac-Lulang FMR,
Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Calacapan Calanyugan-
Kimalok FMR, Initao
Upgrading/Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Cogon Tawan-tawan –
Aluna FMR, Initao
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Upgrading/ Concreting of 2 km PCA, MLGUs, 54,000 PCA,
Oguis-Bandrera FMR, PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Initao PRDP PLGU,
DA,
PRDP
Tuboran to Aluna FMR, 1.5 km 45,000
Naawan
Bangcalon to Tuboran 2.5 km 75,000
FMR, Naawan
Linangkayan Highway to 4 km 120,000
Don Pedro FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Poblacion to 7 km 210,000
Patag FMR, Naawan
Mat-I Linugos to Tagbalogo 6 km 180,000
FMR, Naawan
Don Pedro to Digcamara 3 km 90,000
FMR, Naawan
Lapad to Tuboran Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Purok 3 Mapulog to 3 km 90,000
Tagbalogo FMR,
Naawan
Digcamara Mapulog to 2 km 60,000
Cabilin Road, Naawan
Mapulog P2 to Banatihon 5.5 km 160,000
Road, Naawan
Concreting of Mapulog – 4 km 92,400
Tuboran FMR with Arc
bridges component,
Naawan
Concreting of Suwa-Bangko 4.58 km 137,400
Lubilan FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Mat-I Lubilan 8.27 km 165,400
FMR, Naawan
Lubilan to Mambuntan 3 km 90,000
Road, Naawan
Lubilan to Mahanggub 2 km 60,000
Road, Naawan
Tagbalogo P8 to 4 km 120,000
Pasagdihon FMR, Naawan
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Mat-I to Pasagdihon FMR, 3 km PCA, MLGUs, 90,000 PCA,
Naawan PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Centro Don Pedro to 2.309 km 60,500
Macawa Road, Naawan
Don Pedro to Linangkayan 2 km 60,000
FMR, Naawan
Mapulog P6 to P8 FMR, 5 KM 150,000
Naawan
Maputi P8 to P12 FMR, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Maputi to Tuboran, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Concreting of FMR Along 3 km 90,000
Purok 5-A & Purok 5-B of
Brgy. Pagawan, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 4 km 120,000
Sitio Donque, Upper
Malibog, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 5 km 150,000
Barangay Balintad,
Manticao
Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 54,000
Sambuyaan Road, km
Manticao
Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km 97,200
Kolambugan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao
Concreting 0.70 18,900
PanianganBrgy. Road, km
Manticao
Concreting TuodPurok 0.50 13,500
7 , Manticao km
Concreting of Balintad – 1.5 km 40,000
Victory Road, Manticao
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Magpait 2.50 PCA, 67,500 PCA,
– Camanga Road, km MLGUs, MLGUs,
PLGU, DA,
Manticao PLGU, DA, PRDP
PRDP
Concreting of Tuod- 3.00 81,000
Pagangon Road, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Mahayahay – Kilablab, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Mahayahay – km
Limonda, Manticao
Concreting of Donque 3.00 81,000
Hill, Manticao km
Concreting of Bagares 0.50 13,500
St., Manticao km
Concreting of Sabuero 0.30 8,100
St., Manticao km
Concreting of 0.30 8,100
Cementery Road, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.50 94,500
Mahayag-Digkilaan, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Sagyawan – Malibato, km
Manticao

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source Rank
Constraints in SUB/ Management Lead & (000) of Funds
the VC Dev’t. in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the Province Players
Upgrading/Concreting Awang Road at 5.985 179,550
Brgy. Awang, Opol

Upgrading/Concreting Giangkan Road 2.655 79,650

at Brgy. Awang, Opol

Upgrading/ Concreting Camingawan – 6.020 180,600

Lala Oro Tapurok Road, Patag &
Malanang, Opol

Upgrading /Concreting Binigwayan-Mala 2.680 80,000

Oro Road, Patag & Malanang, Opol

Upgrading/ Concreting Tulahon- 0.615 18,450

Camaroc Road, Malanang, Opol

Upgrading/ Concreting Megdaha Road, 3.875 116,250

Tingalan, Opol

Upgrading/ Concreting Old Tingalan 1.780 53,400

Road, Opol

Upgrading/ Concreting Tingkulan Road, 3.81 114,300

Bagocboc, Opol

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Production Segment
Limited Provide fast and Provision of technical Mis. Or. Coconut Disseminate DA,PLGU, 700 700 700 700 DA,PLGU,
outreach of efficient extension provider farmers success stories on MLGU & PCA MLGU &
existing services Provision of 2 vehicle for Mis. Or. hesitant to higher yields and Farmer 300 PCA
extension technical provider 1 per follow lower production Cooperatives Farmer
services and District upgraded costs incurred Cooperati
providers Conduct extension Conducted farm visits, All coconut All All All technology. using upgraded 200 200 200 200 ves
service to educate and encouraged farmers areas coconut coconut coco technology
and encourage to venture on coconut areas areas nut
farmers on viability production areas
and high returns of
coconut production
Low Giving Incentives to At Least 50% of coconut 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000
Productivity farmers adopted farmers will comply new
upgraded technology technology
Technical & Financial At Least 70% of coconut 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Support to farmers farmers will provided with
adopted upgraded technical and financial
technology support
Low Production of Availability of subsidy Magsaysay/ Medina/ Balingoa Clav 18,000 18,000 12,000 2,000
coco fiber and coco from government Gingoog Talisayan n/ eria
peat due to lack of agencies like DA thru City/ / Lagonglo
Kinoguitan/ Binuanga ng/
decorticating PRDP, PCA, DOST high
Sugbongco n/Salay/ Balingas
machines and standard 2 pass gon/Jasaan/ Tagoloan/ ag /
Inconsistent quality of decorticating machine Villanueva/ Alubijid, Libertad/
produced coco fiber with appropriate storage Opol/El Laguindin Initao/
due to sub-standard facilities and transport Salvador/ gan/ Lugait
decorticating facilities. Naawan Gitagum/
machines since Manticao
fabricators of good
machines is
discouraged by
lengthy
documentation and
processing to bid.

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Low Production of Information All coconut All All All DA,PLGU, DA,PLGU,
 coco fiber and coco dissemination on the areas coconut coconut coco MLGU & PCA MLGU &
peat due to lack of income opportunities of areas areas nut Farmer PCA
raw materials coconut husk areas Cooperatives Farmer
Cooperati
(coconut husks)
ves
Limited areas Planting of dwarf 5 Cluster/ 1 per Growth Gingoog Naawan/ El PCA/ DA, 1,000 1,000 500 PCA/
planted with varieties thru Areas City / Jasaan Salvador PLGU, DA,PLGU,
dwarf varieties clustering of areas Balingasag DILG, MLGU, DILG,
that produced ATI / PO MLGU,
that will served as
quality sap for ATI/ PO
coco sugar. production areas.
Existing areas Conduct skills training 1 training/year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis.
with dwarf on proper tuba Or. 500 500 500 500
varieties have gathering.
limited skilled
farmers and
resources to
train; this will
affect supply of
sap
Post-Harvest
Lack of Provision of Produce food grade All coconut All All All Drought, Establish drainage PCA, MLGUs, 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 PCA,
production of Equipment’s for copra areas coconut coconut coco Flood, canal/flood PLGU, DA- MLGUs,
good quality “white copra central” areas areas nut Tropical control, slope PRDP , PLGU,
copra and Provision of M & E for Full utilization of whole areas Storm, protection, PhilMech 200 200 200 200 DA-PRDP
copra price composting facilities, nut. -Oil Processing Plant earthquake Implement , PhilMech
classification, coco peat and coir registration for
non-utilization production, charcoal crops insurance
of coconut and coco
husk, coconut
shell and
coconut water

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Management Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
 Lack of access to Availability of techno- All coconut All All All Drought, Establish PCA, MLGUs, 300 300 300 300 PCA,
best practices, transfer and skills areas coconut coconut coconut Flood, drainage PLGU, DA- MLGUs,
areas areas areas Tropical canal/flood PRDP , PLGU,
techno-transfer and training offered by
Storm, control, slope PhilMech DA-PRDP
skills trainings several government earthquake protection, , PhilMech
resulting to lack of agencies, leading Implement
experts and enterprises of the registration for
techniques in industry. crops
producing high quality insurance
hanks and geo-nets
Low Production of Information All coconut All All All PLGU,PCA, 200 200 200 200 PLGU,PC
coco fiber and coco dissemination on the areas coconut coconut coconut MLGU, A, MLGU,
peat due to lack of income opportunities of areas areas areas BLGU, POs BLGU,
POs
raw materials coconut husk
(coconut husks)
Unattractive Development of 1 training/year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. 500 500 500 500
labor rates expert twiner’s and
causes to operators through
produce less
trainings and higher
expert twiners
and operators standard pricing of
since they are hanks
not determined
to learn and
master the
craft
Low production Higher standard of 1 twining machine for Magsaysay/ Medina/ Balingo Claveria 500,000 500,000 500,000 100,000
of high quality manual twining livelihood / LGUs Gingoog Talisayan an/
hanks due to machines for City/ / Lagongl
Kinoguitan/ Binuanga ong/
lack of efficient livelihood purposes
Sugbongco n/Salay/ Balinga
twining gon/Jasaan/ Tagoloan/ sag /
machines Villanueva/ Alubijid, Libertad
Opol/El Laguindin / Initao/
Salvador/ gan/ Lugait
Naawan Gitagum/
Manticao
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Risk Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Processing/Trading/Distribution/
Farmers Capacitate farmers to Establish processors for PCA,
MLGUs,
engagement in engage value adding; food and non-food PCA, MLGUs,
PLGU,
PLGU, DA-
traditional VCO, Coco coconut products PRDP,
DA-PRDP,
PhilMech,
products and sweetener and namely: PhilMech,
ATI,
ATI, TESDA,
not adapting integrated coconut DTI, DOST
TESDA,
value adding processing. -Establishment of Coco DTI,
Gingoog Balingasag El 25,000 30,000 30,000 DOST
Sugar Processing and City Salvador
Marketing
-Establishment of Magsaysay 20,714
Coconut Sauce
Processing and
Marketing
-Establishment of Gingoog/ Jasaan/ Laguindi 300,000 300,000 100,000
Coconut Products Medina/ Naawan ngan
Processing and Balingasag /Manticao
marketing
Lack of Information Increase domestic All coconut All coconut All All 500 500 500 500
Product dissemination consumption of coconut areas areas coconut cocon
Promotion through farmer’s product thru info drive on areas ut
areas
training, Techno- the health benefits of
demo and mass coconut products
Consumer’s media. Private and public
lack of partnership in the
knowledge of processing sector
the health Product diversification
benefits of and enterprise
coconut development for
products sustainable livelihood
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Management Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
No direct access PCA should pass a 2 info drive/annum Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. PCA, DA, 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 PCA, DA,
to market since policy to have much PLGU, PLGU,
buyers requires easier accreditation MLGU, MLGU,
BLGU, PO
accreditation and and permitting BLGU, PO
permits from requirements for
sellers and coconut fiber
presence of big producers, facilitate
consolidators/ cluster consolidators
corporations who and disseminate info
monopolizes the the available market
trading of coco outlet.
fibers causes
small players to
get a much lower
profit margin.
Lack of PCA must incorporate 1 training / year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. PCA, DA, 500 500 500 500 PCA, DA,
installation installation training PLGU, PLGU,
training from the MLGU, MLGU,
BLGU, PO BLGU, PO
buyer, therefore,
appreciation of
the product is
affected
High Shipping cost 1 Government Shipping DA DA-PRDP 100,000 DA-PRDP
shipping/transport reduction facility
costs due to
transshipment

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Management Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
 Doesn’t meet Information 1 training/year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. ATI, DA, ATI, DA,
volume dissemination on the PCA, PLGU, PCA,
requirement due potential & income MLGU, PLGU,
BLGU, PO MLGU,
to low supply of opportunities of
BLGU, PO
finished products coconut fiber and
peat & government
support and subsidy
will result to
development of more
players in the industry
thus, increase in
volume and quality is
expected.
Higher standard 3 POs links to buyers Naawan Gingoog Jasaan ATI, DA, ATI, DA,
pricing and direct City PCA, PLGU, PCA,
access to markets by MLGU, PLGU,
BLGU, PO MLGU,
small players will
BLGU, PO
encourage more
producers of quality
fibres
Existing Coco Enhancement of 3 Processing Center Gingoog Magsaysa Balinga Farmers Emphasis on PRDP, PRDP,
Sugar Producer Coco Sugar City y sag and other collective or DA,PLGU, DA,PLGU,
are not BFAD Processing Center VC players industry level DILG, MLGU, DILG,
will not marketing shall PO MLGU, PO
accredited. that will suit with
share be given as
BFAD standard information back up by DTI
to maintain on competitive
competitive marketing
advantage strategy
(individualis
tic mind-
set)

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Risk Management Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Inter- Firm Relationships
Marketing Establish SCFOs as -Produce production in Magsaysay/ Medina/ Balingo Claveria PCA, MLGUs, 100 100 100 100 PCA,
agreement Consolidators/hub to bulk thus demand high Gingoog Talisayan/ an/ PLGU, DA- MLGUs,
between minimize farmers price City/ Binuangan Lagongl PRDP, PLGU, DA-
Traders and engagement to Kinoguitan/ /Salay/ ong/ PhilMech, PRDP,
middlemen/suki Sugbongco Tagoloan/ Balinga ATI, TESDA, PhilMech,
farmers are
gon/Jasaan/ Alubijid, sag / DTI, DOST, ATI,
informal and Villanueva/ Laguinding Libertad LBP, DBP TESDA,
are Opol/El an/ / Initao/ DTI,
characterized Salvador/ Gitagum/ Lugait DOST,
by the concept Naawan Manticao LBP, DBP
of “suki system
or
personalized
economic
relationship
Research and Development
Pest and Disease Continuing research Conduct Pests and Magsaysay/ Medina/ Balingo Claveria Drought, Establish PCA 200 200 200 200 PCA
Prevention and development on diseases management Gingoog Talisayan/ an/ Flood, drainage Research Research
Pest and disease forum City/ Binuangan Lagongl Tropical canal/flood Centers, Centers,
Kinoguitan/ /Salay/ ong/ Storm, control, slope SCUs, DA SCUs, DA
prevention
Sugbongco Tagoloan/ Balinga earth protection, no Research, Research,
gon/Jasaan/ Alubijid, sag / quake build zone in DTI DOST, DTI DOST,
Villanueva/ Laguinding Libertad hazards prone PCARRD PCARRD
Opol/El an/ / Initao/ areas
Strengthen Research To address the Salvador/ Gitagum/ Lugait High Risk Awareness of
and Devt on challenges of food Naawan Manticao of Health risk due
production, post- contaminants: Mineral Oil Contamin to food
ation contamination
harvest and Saturated Hydrocarbons
processing (MOSH) & Mineral Oil
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
(MOAH)
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Risk Management Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Extension
Limited man- Hire more extension Educate farmers to new Magsaysay/ Medina/ Balingo Claveria Drought, Establish PCA, MLGUs, 500 500 500 500 PCA,
power to outreach workers to reach out farming technologies Gingoog Talisayan/ an/ Flood, drainage PLGU, DA MLGUs,
the existing farmers in remote Enhancement of farmer’s City/ Binuangan Lagongl Tropical canal/flood PLGU, DA
extension areas farming perspective Kinoguitan/ /Salay/ ong/ Storm, control, slope
Sugbongco Tagoloan/ Balinga earth protection, no
services.
gon/Jasaan/ Alubijid, sag / quake build zone in
Villanueva/ Laguinding Libertad hazards prone
Opol/El an/ / Initao/ areas
Salvador/ Gitagum/ Lugait
Naawan Manticao
Policy
Limited Extend all available All stakeholders become Magsaysay/ Medina/ Balingo Claveria PCA, MLGUs, 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 PCA,
knowledge on support to the direct participants in, and Gingoog Talisayan/ an/ PLGU, DA- MLGUs,
available support concerned beneficiaries of, such City/ Binuangan Lagongl PRDP, DTI, PLGU, DA-
Kinoguitan/ /Salay/ ong/ ATI, PCIC, PRDP,
offered under RA stakeholders to development and growth
Sugbongco Tagoloan/ Balinga DA, NDA, DTI, ATI,
11524 or also improve efficiency gon/Jasaan/ Alubijid, sag / CHED, BAI, PCIC, DA,
known as “The and productivity Villanueva/ Laguinding Libertad TESDA, NDA,
Coconut Farmers Opol/El an/ / Initao/ LBP,DBP, CHED,
and Industry Salvador/ Gitagum/ Lugait PhilMech, BAI,
Development Naawan Manticao DPWH, TESDA,
Trust Fund Act”. DOST, LBP,DBP,
PCARRD PhilMech,
DPWH,
DOST,
PCARRD
 PRIORITY COMMODITY CHAIN
DEVELOPMENT

Commodity Value Chain 6: Fresh Mango

Misamis Oriental

III Mango-231
3.6 Commodity Value Chain 7: Mango

3.6.1 Commodity Profile

The Mango, scientifically named as Mangifera indica which is also referred as the King of Fruits, is a tropical
fruit belonging to the Anacardiaceae family. Native to India, it is now being produced in over 90 countries
worldwide and is 2nd to banana as most consumed tropical fruit in the world. According to the Food and
Agriculture Organization (FAO), Asia accounts an average share of 74 % mango, mangosteen and guava
production. Americas and Africa on the other hand average regional shares on production are approximately
12% and 14 %, respectively.

Mangoes grow best in tropical places like India, Thailand, China, Indonesia, Philippines and in other parts of
the world with temperature ranging from 21°C to 30°C, relatively cool dry season and a well distributed
rainfall. During the flowering and fruiting period it is favourable during dry season or rain/moisture free so that
fungal development can be avoided. India, China, Indonesia and Pakistan were among the top producers,
while the Philippine ranked 12th in production volume.

Mango is the national fruit of the Philippines and is considered as one of the most important fruit crops in the
country, next to bananas and pineapple. Base on study conducted by PSA shows that the second as the
most consumed fruit by household respondents. Accordingly, about 34.07% of household respondents
consumed mango second to banana with 56.75% of households reporting consumption. Buying of mango for
consumption was indicated by 74.03% to 87.53% of the consuming households.

Mango is the third largest fruit export of the country next to Cavendish Banana and Pineapple. Among its
varieties, the Carabao Mango also known as the Manila Super Mango is the prime export variety. Other
varieties are Pico, Katchamita and Pahutan.

The Carabao which originated from India, Burma and Malaysia is considered as one of the finest and
sweetest variety in the world. It is elongated and kidney-shaped, with yellow pulp, sweet and tender taste,
and slight aroma.

The Pico and Katchamita also originated from India. Other varieties such as Pahutan, Dubul, Binoboy and
Senorita can also be found in the country. Varieties of mango that can be found in the Philippines are further
described in Table 3.6.1 Aside from its texture and taste, Mango contains a lot of nutritional values such as
Vitamins A, B and C, and is rich in minerals, fiber and pro vitamins.

Table 3.6.1 Common Varieties and its Characteristic of Mango

Variety Description
Carabao  Considered as one of the best mango varieties in the world because of its tender taste and
slight aroma. Originated from India, Burma and Malaya. Tree has coarse, large and conical
trunk with shallow and small cracks on bark, canopy dome shaped.
 Fruit is elongated and kidney-shaped, weighs about 240 grams, with thin, and yellow pulp.
 About 82.32% of the Philippines mango volume production is “Carabao” variety. (80.54% of
varieties produced in Luzon, 91.43% of Visayas and 81.10% of Mindanao production).
Pico  originated from India, Burma and Malaya (Indo-Burma region); tree has upright growth, open
crown; has deeper cracks on bark ; kidney-shaped fruit weighing about 230 grams; distinct
beak on the apex, flesh is fibrous and thick, light orange yellow and sweeter than “Carabao”
variety
Katchamita  Originated from India , has compact crown and lower tree stand than “Carabao” and “Pico” ;
fruit is small to medium, rounded/oval, green skin with yellowish flesh and preferably eaten
as green

III Mango-232
Majority of mango production in the Philippines are consumed locally or exported as fresh. About 5 % of the
world productions are being processed as mango pulps and juices. In the Philippines, green mangoes are
used as appetizer, salad ingredients or for making mango shakes and juices. Majority of ripe mangoes are
being served as a table fruit, other uses are also for juices, purees, nectars and dried mangoes.

In the Philippines it has been performing in the international mango industry. The Philippines rank the 12th
among the major mango producing countries in the world, in terms of production volume. The top three
producing countries are India, China and Kenya. Food and Agriculture Organizations (FAO) of the United
Nations declared that from world production for mangoes, mangosteen and guavas had been consistently
increasing annually.

In the national context, mango industry continues to be one of the backbone industries of the country’s
agriculture sector contributing an average of P14.5 Billion per year to agriculture GVA from 2001-2013. It
ranks 2nd as the most important fruit in the country in terms of value next to banana and ranks 3rd in terms
of volume of production and area after banana and pineapple. It supports about 2.5 million farmers all over
the Philippines.

The productivity of mango is highly dependent to farm inputs. A year round production can now become
possible with the right inputs and proper care and management of the plantation. Given the right application
of technologies being introduced by government agencies and credible research institutions, an 8MT-15MT
yield is not impossible as experienced by most growers. However, the lack of capital to finance the high cost
of inputs constraint them to do so. Conversely, this means the lack of access to financing services that is
responsive to the needs and fitting to the financial capacity of the farmers/growers.

Low productivity is also attributed to other causes such as unpredictable weather which accordingly is
something that is new to Mindanao in the recent years.

In terms of its market, it is well established within the country and internationally with the expanding demand
both for fresh fruit and processed products. At present, the Philippines is exporting fresh mango to 48
countries all over the world. Its major export markets are Japan and Hongkong with 52.9 % and 35.7%
respective shares in terms of value. Other export destinations are Singapore, Korea, United States of
America, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, United Kingdom and Switzerland.

Philippine export performance of fresh mango had been plummeting over the years. But in spite this, because
of the premium quality it has established Philippine Mango still has brilliant opportunities in the world market.
The carabao variety specifically, is considered the sweetest mango in the world

In addition, the declaration of the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) allowing the Philippine Mango to be
imported in the US Mainland poses expanding opportunities not only for Mindanao but also for other mango
producing provinces in the country.

There are however several issues that encumber the growth of the industry in spite the expanding
opportunities. Figure 3.6.1, illustrated summary of key constraints and proposed interventions identified by
players during the stakeholder’s conference in order to achieve the desired results along each segment in the
value chain.

III Mango-233
 Input Transform Distributio
Production Assembly Final Sale
provision ation n

1 1.Susceptibility to 1.Inadequate 1.Low supply of Low buying price

export grade High transportation due to:
1. High investment cost 2. pest and diseases knowledge of cost due to limited 1.Inability to plan
Lack of financial 2.Non- sorters and
resources compliance to GAP harvesters on 2.No VHT, WHT transport services, and monitor
and Post- poor farm to production
Constraints 3. Limited access to and other proper handling
financing and input technologies 2.Ineffective harvest facilities market roads and 2.Limited
distance of market level of buyers
materials 3.Unpredictable harvesting method
weather and equipment 3.Disaggregate
sector and multi
layer marketing

1. 1.R & D to improve 1.Organize and 1. Trainings and

1. Strengthen
train sorters and technical assistance 1.Trainings on
resistance to pest inplementation of
Provision of Free harvesters on buyers standard planning and
and diseases FMR (I-BUILD
input materials 2.Provision of requirements (sizes, monitoring
2. Program)
2.LGU to mechanical fruit texture, ripeness,and 2.Through I-REAP
Continues technical 2.LGUs to develop
provide financing picker and other maximum MRL) encourage private
assistance for GAP, barangay access
program equipment for 2. provision of post- or Cooperative's
HACCP and other roads going to key
harvesting harvest facilities (I- investment on VHT,
food safety production areas
3.R & D REAP) WHT and other
Interventions requirements
treatment facilities

Industry mapping and clustering

Organizing and strengthening of associations and cooperatives
Development and Administration of Mindanao Mango Industry Website
I > > > >
mproved accessibility Improved Reduced post- >Improved export Reduced cost Higher buying
to farm inputs productivity harvest losses performance >Increased price, higher net-
>Improved quality >Improved quality >Improved quality efficiency profit ratio
Desired
produced produced >Reduced
Results
opportunity losses

Figure 3.6.1 Summary of Major Constraints, Proposed Interventions and Desired Result in Every Segment of
the Value Chain

Opportunities and challenges with the growing demand for Mango

Mango is one of the priority crops in the Philippines, and it is being supported by the different Philippine
Government Agencies through major programs of the Department of Agriculture, Department of Trade and
Industry, Department of Science and Technology and other local government agencies.

The Philippine Mango which has been known for its taste and aroma has created a premium niche in the
world market. The high and increasing demand in the international market for fresh and frozen mango offers
a lot of opportunities to the mango industry.

In 2022, the Philippines Statistics Authority (PSA) recorded, an existing production area of 178,138.29
hectares producing a volume of 712,553.17 MT, with 7.35 % the volume production coming from Northern
Mindanao, with a total production of 52,401.69 Mt. from an area of 8,769.50 hectares with an average
production of 6 Mt./hectare. Among the provinces of Northern Mindanao the biggest producing province of
mango is Misamis Occidental and followed by Misamis Oriental a total production of 18,600.10 Mt. which
shared 35.5% of the total Northern Mindanao production.

III Mango-234
Table 3.6.2 reflected area planted/harvested in the Philippines, Northern Mindanao Misamis Oriental. Area
planted and harvested in the country was increasing from2018 to 2020 and continuously decreasing from
2021 to 2022. For Northern Mindanao area planted / harvested was continuously increasing from 2018 to
2022, while in Misamis Oriental was continuously increasing from 2018 to 2020 then it was stable between
2020 and2021 and increases in 2022.

Table 3.6.2 Area Planted/Harvested of Mango in the Philippines/ Northern Mindanao/

Misamis Oriental 2018-2022 (in Hectares)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Philippines 185,858.47 186,621.07 186,798.07 185,900.18 178,138.29
Northern Mindanao 8,722.00 8,730.20 8,827.08 8,832.83 8,769.50
Misamis Oriental 2,009.00 2,017.20 2,034.12 2,034.12 2,014.00

Generally Philippines is a major producer of carabao mango which is also known as super mango. Table
3.6.3 shows volume of mango production in the Country from 2018 to 2021 mango production was increasing
and slightly decreases in 2022. For Northern Mindanao mango production was increasing from 2018 to 2020
and decreases from 2021 to 2022, while for Misamis Oriental production performance is same trend with
Northern Mindanao.

Table 3.6.3 Volume of Mango Production in the Philippines/ Northern Mindanao/

Misamis Oriental 2018-2022 (in Metric Tons)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Philippines 711,659.89 737,938.35 739,249.79 741,694.99 712,553.17
Mango Carabao 571,436.71 593,081.01 596,310.54 603,100.96 581,395.45
Mango Piko 29,764.79 31,570.54 31,251.56 30,995.83 27,548.16
Mango Other 110,458.40 113,286.79 111,687.69 107,598.20 103,609.57
Northern Mindanao 50,705.11 52,571.21 53,448.68 52,477.60 52,401.69
Mango Carabao 47,328.11 48,947.81 49,809.45 48,825.54 48,761.88
Mango Piko 459.32 500.71 517.58 516.84 503.30
Mango Other 2,917.68 3,122.69 3,121.65 3,135.22 3,136.51
Misamis Oriental 17,550.17 18,835.54 19,190.83 18,642.90 18,600.10
Mango Carabao 16,907.00 18,137.00 18,490.11 17,921.33 17,857.53
Mango Piko 7.07 7.64 7.55 7.54 7.00
Mango Other 636.10 690.90 693.17 714.03 735.57

Comparative average yield performance of the country, Northern Mindanao and Misamis Oriental from 2018
to 2022, Misamis Oriental has better average yield compared with Northern Mindanao and Philippines.
Average yield/ hectare of the Philippines were increasing from 2018 to 2021 and was stable in 2022.
Northern Mindanao average yield for the last five years has up and down trend while for Misamis Oriental
was increasing from 2018 to 2020 it decreases in 2021 then slightly increases in 2022.

III Mango-235
Table 3.6.4 Average Yeid/ Hectare of Mango in the Philippines/ Northern Mindanao/
Misamis Oriental 2018-2022 (in Metric Tons/ Hectare)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Philippines 3.83 3,95 3,96 4.00 4.00
Northern Mindanao 5.81 6.02 6.05 5.94 5.98
Misamis Oriental 8.74 9.34 9.43 9.17 9.24

In Misamis Oriental there are 2,526 farmers engaged in mango production covering an area of 2,104 hectares. In 2022
there were about 18,600.10 MT harvested. The top 3 mango producers of the province was Initao, Naawan and
Manticao. The less producers of mango was Balingoan.

Table 3.6.5 Population, Poverty Incidence, Area Harvested, No. of Farmers Engaged and
Production CY2022 of Mango in Misamis Oriental by Municipality/City

Existing
Municipality Population Poverty No. of Area Production
Incidence Farmers Harvested (Mt.)
Magsaysay 36,803 25.8 1215
174 135
Gingoog City 136,698 22.7 1260
180 140
Medina 35,612 18.2 468
65 52
Talisayan 25,761 19.9 684
85 76
Balingoan 11,020 18.5 31.5
44 3.5
Kinoguitan 14,091 17.1 243
120 27
Sugbongcogon 9,764 17.9 112.5
54 12.5
Binuangan 7,441 17.1 274.5
23 30.5
Salay 29,998 17.3 819
50 91
Lagonglong 24,190 18.9 567
43 63
Balingasag 74,385 20.1 1053
150 117
Jasaan 57,055 16.7 1539
114 171
Villanueva 40,419 16.0 783
35 87
Claveria 52,478 22.1 225
89 25
Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 400.5
20 44.5
Opol 66,327 12.7 315
45 35
El Salvador 58,771 13.3 945
150 105
Alubijid 32,163 14.9 729
125 81
Laguindingan 26,363 15.2 400
80 45.5
Gitagum 17,920 15.8 576
120 64
Libertad 12,948 17.9 10 8 72.1

III Mango-236
 Initao 33,902 17.0 1678
210 200.5
Naawan 22,444 16.7 2050
280 250
Manticao 29,469 17.7 1845
220 205
Lugait 20,559 14.1 315
40 35
Misamis Oriental
957,900 21.4 2,526 2,104 18,600.10

Figure 3.6.2 Commodity Map of Mango in Misamis Oriental

Marketing Channel of fresh mango from the Growers it goes either to the processors, contract buyers of
exporters. From the processors it goes to institutional buyers then finally to the consumers. For contact
buyers it goes to the wholesalers/ retailers to institutional buyers then to the consumers, while for exporters
then to institutional buyers then to the consumers. Some times from the growers it goes directly to the
consumers. Below is the schematic diagram of the marketing channel of fresh mango vase in the VCA of
mango.

III Mango-237
 Figure 3.6.3 Marketing Channel of Fresh Mango

Mango Value Chain Development (VCD)

Input Provision

Mangoes are propagated sexually and asexually. Sexual propagations are done through growing of
rootstocks by nursery operators; while sexual propagation can be done through grafting, budding, inarching
etc. Asexual propagation is the most preferred method since seed growing takes longer time. Nurseries are
usually operated by private nursery operators, government agencies or the farmers themselves.

The Bureau of Plant Industry (BPI) under the Department of Agriculture mandated to support the Philippine
plant industry sector including mango. To ensure the integrity of mango being planted it has accredited 31
mango nursery operators in the country, Five (5) of which can be found in Mindanao as shown in table below.
Aside from these accredited nursery operators, farmers also get their seedling from several LGU
municipalities or cities.

Table 3.6.6 BPI Accredited Mango Nursery Operators in Mindanao

REGISTERED BUSINESS NAME LOCATION AREA SQ.M.

La Suerta's Fruit Tree Nursery Don Carlos, Bukidnon NDA

Binahon Agro Forestry Farms (BAFF) Lantapan, Bukidnon 80,000
Dayot Plant Nursery Talomo Dist. Davao City 3,400
Kylle's Nursery and Garden Balindog, Kidapawan City NDA
Cayona-Talento Nursery & Agri. Supply Paco 116, Kidapawan City 30,000
(Source: bpi.da.gov.ph)

III Mango-238
About 73% of the total area planted to mangoes is owned by small farmers with areas less than 3 ha while
24% operate farm sizes between 3 to 9.99ha. Those operating 10 hectares and above constitute only about
3%.

Fertilizers and pesticides are readily available in the locality. However, insufficient financial resources of
growers lead them to enter into contract with input providers.

Production

Mangoes are best planted in tropical countries like Philippines. The volume and the quality of mango
produced varies widely in the tasks under this stage which covers land preparation, flower induction, care and
management including pest and disease control management and bagging, and lastly the harvesting and
hauling.

The tasks under this function are often undertaken by contractors based on management contract with the
farmers. The contractors who provide the input requirement and who do the spraying are the traders at the
same time in most cases. These contractors are called “enhancer” in some areas. The usual practice of profit
sharing in most areas ranges from 25:75 to 30:70 sharing where the latter percentage goes to the
contractors. The services contracted include nutrient, water, pest management and others until its harvest.

Assembly

After harvest, assembly comes next, where sorting, packaging and transporting takes place. Generally this
function is being done by group of sorters in the area. However, most of these sorters which were
commissioned by the growers, consolidators or contractors do not have formal training on sorting and proper
handling. Hence, this is one of the common causes identified for post-harvest damages.

Transformation

This function includes washing or cleaning of fruits, and hot water treatment, Vapor Heat Treatment (VHT),
waxing, sorting, quality control, and packing of mango for export market. These are done by exporters with
VHT facilities.

Hot water treatment usually entails heating dipping of freshly harvested fruit for 5 to 10 minutes in heated
water (52-55°C). This is being done by mango exporters in response to the quality requirements set by
importing countries. It is a disease control technology particularly for anthracnose and stem-end rot, mango
diseases which show up only after the mango is harvested.

Exporters to Japan such as in the case of Nakashin Davao International Inc and Southern Philippine Fresh
Fruit Corporation subject mangoes to VHT after HWT as required by Japanese consignees.

Processors with VHT and HWT are located only in Davao Region. Clearly, if technology or infrastructure such
as these were present in strategic positions along specific regions in Mindanao, it would mean higher
production of export-quality mango. The inadequacy of export quality supply for fresh mango is the main
constraint that this function of the value chain is facing. (Refer to Section 7 for detailed discussion on
constraints).

Table 3.6.7 Buyers Preferred Supply Areas

Region Province Municipalities Peak supply

months
Zamboanga Peninsula Zamboanga Del Sur Dimataling, TabinaLapuyan
Northern Mindanao Misamis Oriental Opol, Puerto and Balingasag, Lugait, April to June
Libertad
Lanao Del Norte Linamon, Kauswagan, Bacolod, Maigo June to December
and Iligan
Davao Region Davao Oriental Mati, San Isidro March to May
Davao Del Sur Digos, Malalag, Bansalan
SOCCSKSARGEN Sultan Kudarat Tacurong, Isulan March to May

III Mango-239
 South Cotabato General Santos City, Tantangan and April to June
Koronadal
North Cotabato Mlang, Pikit, Midsayap April to May
CARAGA Region Agusan Del Norte Nasipit, Buenavista, Butuan and Carmen October-December
Distribution

This function of the value chain is mostly carried out by consolidators and processors. Consolidators usually
buy mangoes from growers and deliver it to processors or local markets and domestic market either for local
consumption or further processing. Domestic buyers of consolidators include those coming from Davao City,
Cebu City and Manila. The processors on the other hand, have contracts with their major export markets in
Japan, Hongkong, Korea and Europe.

Figure 3.6.4 Value Chain Development Map of Fresh Mango

3.6.2 Expanded Vulnerable and Suitability Area (EVSA)

The expanded vulnerability sustainability assessment (EVSA) for mango in Misamis Oriental include the following
parameters, 50% soil suitability, 10% area planted, 10% production volume of the commodity, 10% number of farmers
engaged in mango, 15% poverty incidence and 5% population in determining the ranking of areas where the
commodity is most suitable to be propagated and its value chain developed. An area with new composite index of
0.400 is most suitable for mango production.

Result of the EVSA for the mango commodity is presented in the Table 3.6.8 recorded the area suitable for mango
production. Base on the computation of EVSA Misamis Oriental is generally suitable for mango production because all
municipalities and cities of the province new composite index is above 0.4000 except Balingoan. The top five (5)
municipalities suitable for mango are Naawan, Initao, Manticao, Magsaysay and Jasaan.

Table 3.6.9 RESULTS OF EVSA FOR MANGO IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL

Municipality Population Poverty Area No. of Production Old Old New New Geo Code
Incidence Planted Farmer Composite Rank Composite Rank
Index Index
NAAWAN 22,444 16.7 250 280 2,050 0.603 12 0.70459 1 104320000

III Mango-240
INITAO 33,902 17 200.5 210 1,678 0.6763 6 0.68731 2 104310000
MANTICAO 29,469 17.7 205 220 1,845 0.5719 16 0.64451 3 104318000
MAGSAYSAY 36,803 25.8 135 174 1,215 0.5738 15 0.60446 4 104317000
JASAAN 57,055 16.7 171 114 1,539 0.5957 13 0.59742 5 104311000
BALINGASAG 74,385 20.1 117 150 1,053 0.6112 11 0.59302 6 104302000
GINGOOG CITY 136,698 22.7 140 180 1,260 0.4726 26 0.57966 7 104308000
EL SALVADOR 58,771 13.3 105 150 945 0.6188 10 0.55506 8 104307000
LAGUINDINGAN 26,363 15.2 45.5 80 400 0.76 1 0.55284 9 104314000
GITAGUM 17,920 15.8 64 120 576 0.6967 2 0.54754 10 104309000
ALUBIJID 32,163 14.9 81 125 729 0.6512 7 0.54027 11 104301000
VILLANUEVA 40,419 16 87 35 783 0.6777 4 0.53504 12 104326000
TAGOLOAN 80,319 16.8 44.5 20 400.5 0.6891 3 0.51799 13 104324000
TALISAYAN 25,761 19.9 76 85 684 0.5547 18 0.48577 14 104325000
SALAY 29,998 17.3 91 50 819 0.5416 21 0.47011 15 104322000
LIBERTAD 12,948 17.9 8 10 72.1 0.6766 5 0.45654 16 104315000
LUGAIT 20,559 14.1 35 40 315 0.6201 9 0.44689 17 104316000
LAGONGLONG 24,190 18.9 63 43 567 0.5376 22 0.44601 18 104313000
KINOGUITAN 14,091 17.1 27 120 243 0.556 17 0.44274 19 104312000
OPOL 66,327 12.7 35 45 315 0.5869 14 0.44173 20 104321000
MEDINA 35,612 18.2 52 65 468 0.5247 23 0.439 21 104319000
CLAVERIA 52,478 22.1 25 89 225 0.4796 25 0.42141 22 104306000
SUGBONGCOGON 9,764 17.9 12.5 54 112.5 0.5483 19 0.4043 23 104323000
BINUANGAN 7,441 17.1 30.5 23 274.5 0.5429 20 0.4014 24 104304000
BALINGOAN 11,020 18.5 3.5 44 31.5 0.5212 24 0.38105 25 104303000

VSA Map3.6.5
Figure for Mango
EVSA Commodity
Map of Mango in Misamis Oriental

3.6.3 Mango Industry Strategic Development Directions and Investment Plan

Investment Plan and Strategic Development Direction

III Mango-241
Mango industry needs to overcome numerous challenges to be able to realize its potentials. Among these are
(a) low productivity and production; (b) slow market growth and poor linkage to value-adding activities; (c)
weak institutions and policies; (d) weak governance and resource degradation; and (e) vulnerability to climate
risks and disasters.

With the mentioned challenges, its aims for agriculture and fisheries sector into (a) increase productivity in
the sector; (b) increase forward linkage with the industry and services sectors; and (c) improve sector
resilience to risks, including climate change.

In order to facilitate the linkage of agriculture to the industry and services sectors, farmers will be trained in
value-adding, agri-business development and value chain management farmers will be trained in value-
adding, agri-business development and value chain management activities. Farmers groups and
cooperatives will be strengthened and, where possible, transformed into MSMEs that can transact with other
MSMEs in industry and services. Links with industry and services so as to fulfil its potential to reduce poverty
and generate quality employment for more Filipinos.

By the end of 2026, the sector will have achieved higher incomes and improvement of food security,
especially for the farm households, through (a) further increases in agricultural production with more prudent
use of resources; (b) greater linkage with the manufacturing and industrial sector with increased production of
raw material inputs; and (c) enhanced sector resilience to climate change risks.

In order to make the mango industry stronger, from “sunset to sunrise industry” as quoted from the goal of
not only focused on how to improve productivity but also how to stabilize buying prize in the market. Thus,
aside from increasing the volume produced it is also very important to plan their production cycle through
monitoring other areas production to take advantage for seasons where supply is low and demand is high. At
the long term interventions to stabilize pricing requires investment on processing or treatment plantations.

III Mango-242
 3.6.4 PCIP Gap Matrix Mango Value Chain in Misamis Oriental

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & VC Development in the Potential Intervention O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead & 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
Services Province Sub other
MF Players
O
INPUT PROVISION
In Accessibility of Provision of inputs thru 2,000 bags of fertilizer All mango All mango All mango All mango DA/ PLGU/ 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 DA/ PLGU/
farmers to inputs inputs subsidy will be distributed areas areas areas areas MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
Limited access to LGUs provide financial 80% of the area will be All mango All mango All mango All mango 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000
financing assistance to farmers finance about or 200 areas areas areas areas
thru Plant Now Pay hectare/ year
later /voucher
Mango Growers will be 1 training /year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ PLGU/
trained on Financial MLGU/ MLGU/
Literacy PO/ ATI PO/ATI
PRODUCTION
Limited Training of GAP mango 1 training /year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ PLGU/
knowledge on and sustainable farming MLGU/ MLGU/
GAP mango and system PO/ ATI PO/ATI
sustainable Establishment of 1 Demo per Growth Naawan Jasaan Balingasag Magsaysay DA/ PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ PLGU/
farming system Techno demo Area MLGU/ MLGU/ PO
PO/
Unpredictable Pest and Diseases R & D to improve Naawan Jasaan Balingasag Magsaysay DA/ PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ PLGU/
Weather infestation resistance to pest and MLGU/ MLGU/ PO
Condition diseases-demo 1 per PO/
Growth area
PROCESSING / TRANSFOORMATION
Lack of access to Establishment of 1 per Growth Area Naawan Jasaan Balingasag Magsaysay DA/ PLGU/ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA/ PLGU/
facilities to Consolidation Center & MLGU/ MLGU/ PO
consistently marketing PO/
produce high
quality fresh Provision of tools, tools, equipment, HWT, All mango All mango All mango All mango 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
mango equipment, HWT, other other post-harvest area area area area
post-harvest facilities facilities provided

III Mango-243
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of Potential MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Intervention O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead & 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
Services in the Province Sub other
MF Players
O
Training of farmers 1 Training per year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ 500 500 500 500 DA/
on quality control PLGU/ PLGU/
MLGU/ MLGU/
PO/ ATI PO/ATI
MARKETING
Lack of Training on 1 Training per year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ 500 500 500 500 DA/
entrepreneurial entrepreneurial skill PLGU/ PLGU/
skills and MLGU/ MLGU/
unstable PO/ ATI PO/ATI
market price Strengthening of 6 PO/Coops Gingoog Salay/ Jasaan Manticao DA/ 1,000 2,000 1,000 1,000 DA/
POs/Cooperative in City Opol PLGU/ PLGU/
order to access MLGU/ MLGU/
PO/ ATI PO/ATI
better market

High Establishment of Concreting of Cebukawon 4 km 320,000

Transportation FMR FMR, Tagoloan
Cost
Concreting of Nasalaban – 2 km 24,000
Subaya FMR, Tagoloan
Rehabilitation of Rosario 3 km 45,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Danao FMR, 5 km 80,000
Tagoloan
Concreting of Kalongonan- 10 km 200,000
Kandal FMR, El Salvador
Concreting of Pavement Road 8,700
(Prk 4) to Existing Concrete
700 meter
Pavement (Prk 6), Pob.
Gitagum
Construction / Concreting of 7,600
FMR P3A Talao-to C.P. 800 meter
Gracia, Gitagum

III Mango-244
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Katipunan- 4.000 km. 108,000
Gumabon Road,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Talisay- 4.000 km. 108,000
Mahayahay Road,
Gingoog City &
Magsaysay
Rehabilitation of 11.530 311,001
Mahayahay-Katipunan- Km
Gumabon-Tama Road,
Magsaysay
Construction of Kandiis- 4.000 108,000
Tibon-Tibon Road, km
Magsaysay
Construction of 6.57 177,390
Damayuhan- Kauswagan km
Road, Magsaysay
Upgrading of Cabantian- 3.000 81,000
Tulang Road, km
Magsaysay
Rehabilitation of 7.000 189,000
Bonifacio –Mindulao km
Road, Magsaysay
Construction of 2 km 54,000
Mindulao-Tama Road,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Talisay- 4.00 108,000
Mahayahay Road, 0 km.
Gingoog City &
Magsaysay
Concreting of Tibon- 15 km 580,000
Tibon-Cabalawan –
Mindulao –Tama FMR
with brige, Magsaysay
Concreting of Kibungsod – 2 km 54,000
Cabantian Circuferencial
Road, Magsaysay

III Mango-245
Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & VC Development in Potential Intervention O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead & 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
Services the Province Sub other
MF Players
O
Construction of Artadi-San 5 km 150,000
Vicente FMR, Magsaysay
Construction of Kibungsod- 4 km 120,000
Cabubuhan –Villa Felipa
FMR, Magsaysay
Concreting of Consuelo- 7 km 189,000
Abunda-Tinaan FMR,
Magsaysay
Construction of Consuelo 6 km 162,000
(Kimaya) Pag-asa FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Cabubuhan 2.5 km 67,500
(Lilo) Kibungsod FMR,
Magsaysay
Road Concreting at Upper 11 km 297,000
Malibud to Dinawihan ,
Ginoog City
Concreting of Gingoog to 70.910 km. 1,914,5
Claveria National Road, 70
Gingoog & Claveria
Concreting of Maanas- 8.600 km. 232,200
Kibuguing Road, Medina &
Gingoog City
Concreting of Kabug- 7.000 km. 189,000
Sidlakan Road, Medina &
Gingoog City
Concreting of Mananum- 1.6 km 43,961
Claveria FMR with Bridge,
Balingasag
Concreting of Kibalua FMR, 4.3 km 116,500
Balingasag
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 km 125,500
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad
FMR, Balingasag

III Mango-246
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Bulwa – Mananum Bag-o PCA, MLGUs, 81,000 PCA,
FMR, Medina 3 Km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU,
DA,
Pahindong – Macopa 81,000 PRDP
FMR, Medina 3 km
Bangbang Sidlakan 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
Tupon- Maanas-San 81,000
Vicente-Maanyag FMR, 3 km
Medina
San Vicente – Kiiwang 2 Km 54,000
FMR, Medina
San Vicente – Sidlakan 2 Km 54,000
FMR, Medina
San Jose – Hollywood 108,000
4KM
FMR , Medina
South Poblacion FMR , 54,000
2 Km
Medina
Mananum Bag-o - 81,000
3 Km
Baluarte FMR, Medina
Portulin – Dig-aguyan 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
Gasa - Hangaron FMR, 81,000
3 KM
Medina
81,000
San Roque FMR, Medina 3 KM

Mimbolo - Natugod FMR, 81,000

3 Km
Medina
Maanas – San Vicente 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina

III Mango-247
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Manamum 6.5 km PCA, MLGUs, 174,000 PCA,
–Daan-Kabol-Kabol FMR PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
with Bridge - Medina PRDP PLGU,
San Isidro – Labas 81,000 DA,
3 Km
Pagsama FMR , Medina PRDP
Concreting of 10 km 240,000
Pangpangon-Putting
Balas-Sibantang-
Mahayahay FMR -
Talisayan
Concreting of Bugdang 2 km 54,000
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Minlimaw- 5 km 135,000
Mahayag FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,00
Mandahilag-Macopa FMR, 0
Talisayan
Concreting of Poblacion – 2 km 54,000
Sindangan FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Pook- 7 km 189,00
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan 0
Concreting of San Jose – 6 km 162,00
Bugdang –Mahayag FMR, 0
Talisayan
Concreting of Mintabon – 5 km 135,000
Sibantang FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Sitio 12.3 km 246,000
Bangbang, Brgy. Buko-
Suarez FMR -Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Panabol- 1.34 km 36,180
Buko FMR-Kinoguitan
Upgrading of Sumalag- 2.11 56,970
Calubo, Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Salicapan- 2.9 78,300
Suarez FMR-Kinoguitan km

III Mango-248
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.726 PCA, MLGUs, 46,602 PCA,
Poblacion FMR, km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
kinoguitan PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Upgrading of Calabo- 1.16 31,320
Kitotok FMR, Kinoguitan km
Concreting and 3 km 100,000
Rehabilitation of FMR of
Kitamban – Valdeconcha
– Mosangot Road,
Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1 km 30,000
Valdeconcha-Silad-
Ampianga FMR,
Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1km 30,000
Kitambis – Kidalayon-
Membuahan FMR,
Binuangan
Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000
(Kumakaykay-
Valdechoncha-
Kitamban), Binuangan
Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000
(Gantangun-Kitambis),
Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini – 1km 30,000
Tinagaan Road,
Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini- 1km 30,000
Tinigaan Road,
Binuangan
Concreting of 10 Km 200,000
Kalongonan Kandal
FMR, Salay

III Mango-249
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Ran
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub & other Players Funds k
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO
Concreting of Mimbule to 1.80 km PCA, MLGUs, 48,000 PCA,
Saray FMR-Salay PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Concreting of Alipuaton- 4 km 120,,000
Bunal FMR- Salay
Concreting of Matampa 1.5 km 40,500
FMR-Salay
Concreting of Saray- 10 km 200,000
Mimbalite –Matampa
FMR, Salay
Construction of FMR with 0.75 km 54,000
4 Barrels Box Cluvert at
Salay River II, Salay
Concreting of Looc- 3.000 90,000
Tinagaan FMR, Salay km
Upgrading of Domagooc 4.000 108,000
to SitioPatrocenio FMR, km.
Jasaan
Upgrading of Solana to 3.000 81,000
Sitio Looc FMR, Jasaan km.
Upgrading of SitioKatu- 5.000 135,000
an, Natubo – Kimamaon km.
Kimaya FMR, Jasaan
Upgrading of San 6.000 162,000
Antonio to Sitio Cogon km.
FMR, Jasaan
Concreting of San 16 432,000
Nicolas-Upper Antonio- km
IS-Cruz Road, Jasaan
Concreting of Sitio Bato, 4 km 320,000
Brgy kimaya- Villanueva

III Mango-250
Value Chain Key Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Ran
Segments & Gap/Constraint in Potential Intervention Sub & other Players Funds k
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services VC Development MFO
in the Province
Upgrading of Dawayan- PCA, MLGUs, 101,126 PCA,
Lokong-Crossing 3.745 PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
4 km
Mambuaya FMR, PRDP PLGU, DA,
Villanueva PRDP
Construction of FMR with 0.61 km 85,000
slope Protection and sheet
piles (300 meters long) in
Sitio Macusi, Brgy. Kimaya,
Villanueva
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) 10km 300,000
Tugasnon-San Francisco El
Salvador
Concreting of Kalongonan- 10 km 300,000
Kandal FMR, El Salvador
Lacapon-Tugasnon Sitio 5.62 168,600
Bato (Hot Spring) km
Seriwagan Sungay Road,
Alubijid
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) – 10km 300,000
Tugasnon- San Fransisco
de Asis, El Salvador
Upgrading of Gimampang-
Aluna-Casilihon FMR- 3.02 km 81,540
Initao
Upgrading/Concreting of
6 km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR, Initao
Upgrading of Sapong- 5.51
km 148,770
Mamiguis-Bansilang FMR-
Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 6 Km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR, Initao
Upgrading/ Concreting of 7 km 189,000
Sinalac-Lulang FMR, Initao

III Mango-251
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Spring Road, 0.79 km PCA, MLGUs, 21,330 PCA,
Laguindingan PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Upgrading of Madrid- PRDP 43,956 PLGU, DA,
1.628 PRDP
Lapad Road ,
km
Laguindingan
Upgrading of Lapad – 80,595
Sikiton Road-Lourdes 2.985
Brgy. Road , km
Laguindingan
Upgrading of Lapad- 13,500
Aromahon-Nob Road, 0.5 km
Laguindingan
Salcedo Hills Drive Road 27,000
1 km
, Laguindingan
Sitio Eba Road , 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Tangke Road, 10,800
0.4 km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot Spring Road, 26,460
0.98 km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot Alongan Road, 35,100
1.3 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Pagangon Road, 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Clarin Road , 75,600
2.8 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Pitogo Road, 25,920
0.96 km
Laguindingan
Upgrading /Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Calacapan Calanyugan-
Kimalok FMR, Initao
Upgrading/Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Cogon Tawan-tawan –
Aluna FMR, Initao

III Mango-252
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Liberty Anosa-Liberty PCA, MLGUs, PCA,
Elem. Sch. Road, 3 km PLGU, DA, 81,000 MLGUs,
Laguindingan PRDP PLGU, DA,
Sinai-Aput Road, 40,500 PRDP
1.5 km
Laguindinga
Sambulawan Bajuyo 67,500
2.5 km
Road, Laguindingan
JKT. National Highway to 54,000
Virgin as Fatima, 2 km
Laguindingan
Sambulawan Tambo 39,744
1.472 km
Road, Laguindingan
Sambulawan Tambo 33,750
1.25 km
Road, Laguindingan
Liberty Pitogo Road, 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Liberty Gasi Road , 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Liberty Campo Road, 3.15 85,050
Laguindingan km
Mauswagon Clarin Road, 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Cacao Mauswagon Rajal Road,
Laguindingan
1 km
27,000

Concreting of Aromahon 37,800

Lapad Road, 1.4 km
Laguindingan
Concreting of Aromahon- 51,300
Tiano Road, 1.9 km
Laguindingan
Gasi-Sinai Road, 16,200
0.6, km
Laguindingan
Gasi-Pipian-Pagangon 23,400
1.2, km
Road, Laguindingan
Sinai-Gasi Road with 40,500
1.5 km
Bridge, Laguindingan

III Mango-253
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Upgrading/ Concreting of 2 km PCA, MLGUs, 54,000 PCA,
Oguis-Bandrera FMR, Initao PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Tuboran to Aluna FMR, 1.5 km 45,000
Naawan
Bangcalon to Tuboran 2.5 km 75,000
FMR, Naawan
Linangkayan Highway to 4 km 120,000
Don Pedro FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Poblacion to 7 km 210,000
Patag FMR, Naawan
Mat-I Linugos to Tagbalogo 6 km 180,000
FMR, Naawan
Don Pedro to Digcamara 3 km 90,000
FMR, Naawan
Lapad to Tuboran Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Purok 3 Mapulog to 3 km 90,000
Tagbalogo FMR,
Naawan
Digcamara Mapulog to 2 km 60,000
Cabilin Road, Naawan
Mapulog P2 to Banatihon 5.5 km 160,000
Road, Naawan
Concreting of Mapulog – 4 km 92,400
Tuboran FMR with Arc
bridges component,
Naawan
Concreting of Suwa-Bangko 4.58 km 137,400
Lubilan FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Mat-I Lubilan 8.27 km 165,400
FMR, Naawan
Lubilan to Mambuntan 3 km 90,000
Road, Naawan
Lubilan to Mahanggub 2 km 60,000
Road, Naawan
Tagbalogo P8 to 4 km 120,000
Pasagdihon FMR, Naawan

III Mango-254
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Mat-I to Pasagdihon FMR, 3 km PCA, MLGUs, 90,000 PCA,
Naawan PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Centro Don Pedro to 2.309 km 60,500
Macawa Road, Naawan
Don Pedro to Linangkayan 2 km 60,000
FMR, Naawan
Mapulog P6 to P8 FMR, 5 KM 150,000
Naawan
Maputi P8 to P12 FMR, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Maputi to Tuboran, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Concreting of FMR Along 3 km 90,000
Purok 5-A & Purok 5-B of
Brgy. Pagawan, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 4 km 120,000
Sitio Donque, Upper
Malibog, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 5 km 150,000
Barangay Balintad,
Manticao
Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 54,000
Sambuyaan Road, km
Manticao
Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km 97,200
Kolambugan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao
Concreting 0.70 18,900
PanianganBrgy. Road, km
Manticao
Concreting TuodPurok 0.50 13,500
7 , Manticao km
Concreting of Balintad – 1.5 km 40,000
Victory Road, Manticao

III Mango-255
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Magpait 2.50 PCA, 67,500 PCA,
– Camanga Road, km MLGUs, MLGUs,
PLGU, DA,
Manticao PLGU, DA, PRDP
PRDP
Concreting of Tuod- 3.00 81,000
Pagangon Road, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Mahayahay – Kilablab, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Mahayahay – km
Limonda, Manticao
Concreting of Donque 3.00 81,000
Hill, Manticao km
Concreting of Bagares 0.50 13,500
St., Manticao km
Concreting of Sabuero 0.30 8,100
St., Manticao km
Concreting of 0.30 8,100
Cementery Road, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.50 94,500
Mahayag-Digkilaan, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Sagyawan – Malibato, km
Manticao

III Mango-256
Commodity Value Chain 7:
Green Coffee Bean
in
Misamis Oriental

111-coffee-257
3.7 Commodity Value Chain 7: Coffee

3.7.1 Commodity Profile

Coffee traces its origin to a genus of plants known as Coffea. Within the genus there are over 500 genera and 6,000
species of tropical trees and shrubs. The most common species is the Arabica, Excelsa, Liberica, and Robusta.
However, Arabica and Robusta species are the most popular in the commercial coffee industry7.

Coffea Arabica represents approximately 70% of the world's coffee production. On the world market, Arabica coffee is
considered to exude superior taste and commands higher market price. The better Arabicas are high grown coffees —
generally grown between 2,000 to 6,000 feet (610 to 1830 meters) above sea level — though optimal altitude varies
with proximity to the equator.

Robusta production is increasing, though it accounts for only about 30% of the world market. The Robusta tree is
heartier and more resistant to disease and parasites, which makes it easier and cheaper to cultivate. It also has the
advantage of being able to withstand warmer climates, preferring constant temperatures between 75 and 85 degrees
Fahrenheit. Compared with Arabica, Robusta beans produce a coffee which has a distinctive taste and about 50-60%
more caffeine.

Coffee is one of the world top commodities and third most consumed beverage globally. It is also the second-most
exported commodity in the world after oil. In 2020, worldwide coffee production is at 169.6 million 60-kilogram bags.
Brazil (63.4M), Vietnam (29.0M), and Columbia (14.3M) were the top three (3) coffee producing countires which 63% of
the world’s production 8.

The Philippine produced 60,607.18 metric tons of coffee in 2021. Of the total production, 70% is Robusta, 23% is
Arabica, 6% is Excelsa, and 1% Liberica. Further, 83% of the country’s production was from Mindanao. Majority of
Mindanao coffee produce were from Region 12 which is 42% (21,007.41MT) while Northern Mindanao has 12% share
(6,234.44MT) of the production (Figure 3.7.1). Of the Northern Mindanao production, Bukidnon contributed 82%
(5,096.29MT) followed by Misamis Oriental with 11% share (689.74MT). Of Bukidnon’s produced, 99% is Robusta
variety (PSA). Robusta’s prominence can be attributed to cheaper cultivation cost and resistant to disease and
parasites which encourage farmers to plant.

The Philippines’ most pronounced advantage in coffe is its geographical condition where it allows production of the four
(4) coffee varieties and it provides natural barriers to disease, and support from government and private sector
stakeholders. However, the Philippine coffee production

The country is importing coffee to meet its demands. The inadequate supply is possibly due to the limited stock of
quality seedlings, aging trees, farmers approaching retirement, limited modern production techniques, limited
knowledge of production and harvesting techniques required to maintain quality, and effects of extreme weather and
rapid urbanization. Another constraint is the absence of washing station infrastructure thus farmers opt to plant robusta
which is less profitable than Arabica. Further, the underdeveloped backward linkages between retailers and domestic
sector posed a challenge in product marketability.

Figure 3.7.1.1 shows the production performance in Mindanao by Region, Region 12 SOCCSKSARGEN is the biggest
coffee producer in Mindanao shared 42% while BARMM and Region 11 Davao Region shared 21% and Region 10
Northern Mindanao shared 12%, while Region 9 Zamboanga Penensula is the lowest producers of coffee shared only
1 %.

111-coffee-258
 Figure 3.7.1 Percent share of Production, Mindanao by Region,
2021 ( in Metric Tons)

From 2018 to 2022 area planted/ harvested with coffee in the Philippines it has up and down trend, in Northern
Mindanao a decreasing trend while for Misamis Oriental from 2018 to 2019 it decreases then it was stable from 2019 to
2021 then increase in 2022. The show production of coffee in Misamis oriental even though Nestle Philippines is
located in the province the buyer of coffee and provide technical assistance to the coffee growers is lack of capital for
inputs and lack of available quality planting materials.

Table 3.7.1 Area Planted/Harvested of Coffee in the Philippines/ Northern Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental
2018-2022 (in Hectares)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Philippines 113,351.88 112,023.69 113,264.89 112,552.80 112,278.89
Northern Mindanao 11,650.40 11,650.30 11,639.41 11,630.28 11,630.28
Misamis Oriental 1,215 1,208 1,208 1,208 1,228

In the Philippines biggest volume of production are robusta, rrabica excels then liberica. According to coffee lover the
best coffee are Arabica. The trend in volume of production for Arabica it increases from 2018 to 2020 them it
continuously decreasing from 2021 to 2022. For robusta it continuously was increasing from 2018 to 2022. Excelsa
increases from 2018 to 2020 and slightly decreasing from 2021 to 2022. While for liberica coffee, volume of production
was continuously decreasing from 2018 to 2022. In general coffe production in the Philippines has up and down trend.

In Northern Mindanao coffee production, it increases from 2018 to 2019, was continuously decreasing from 2020 to
2021 and slightly increasing in 2022. In Northern Mindanao the suitable varieties are Arabica, Robusta and Excelsa.
Among the tree (3) coffee varieties the dominant is robusta followed by Arabica then excels. The follow of production
according to its varieties, Arabica from 2018 it continuously decreasing from 2018 to 2022, robusta it has an up and
down trend. While for excelsa it increasing from 2018 to 2022.

For Misamis oriental there were also three (3) varieties grow namely Arabica, robusta the biggest and excelsa. For
Arabica from 2018 it has an up and down tren from 2018 to 2020 then it continuously decreasing up to 2022. For
robusta it continuously increasing from 2018 to 2020 it slightly decreases in 2021 and it increases in 2022. In general
coffee production in Misamis Oriental it increases from 2018 to 2020 then slightly decreases in 2021 and it increases in
2022. The factors that affects the production of coffee is lack of new technology especially during harvest, the use of
not appropriate post-harvest facilities / equipment hence, resulted to low quality coffee beans.

Table 3.7.2 Volume of Production of Coffee in the Philippines/ Northern Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental
CY2018-2022 (in Metric Tons)

111-coffee-259
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Philippines 60,312.76 60,043.88 60,640.95 60,607.18 59,873.60
Arabica 13,706.19 14,102.30 14,657.46 13,853.22 13,151.12
Robusta 42,070.88 41,550.14 41,808.65 42,627.85 42,729.60
Excelsa 4,039.32 3,907.87 3,712.31 3,676.65 3,551.12
Liberica 496.37 483.57 462.53 449.46 441.76
Northern
Mindanao 5,739.12 5,839.37 5,601.32 6,234.44 6,249.84
Arabica 229.24 206.98 198.88 189.45 181.62
Robusta 5,240.88 5,363.07 5,131.00 5,758.59 5,753.36
Excelsa 269.00 269.32 271.44 286.40 314.86
Misamis Oriental 330.94 335.12 337.22 344.87 415.37
Arabica 1.77 1.79 1.78 1.66 1.53
Robusta 203.43 205.93 207.03 206.18 262.02
Excelsa 125.75 127.40 128.40 137.03 151.82

The average production per hectare, in the Philippines from 2018 it increases in 2019 and was stable from 2019 to
2021 and decreases in 2022. In Northern Mindanao it was increasing from 2018 to 2020, it decreases in 2021 and
stable in 2022. While in Mindanao it was increasing from 2019 to 2022. The good performance in Misamis Oriental was
the strong support of National Agencies organizing the Coffee Producers in the province so new technology is easily
disseminated thru trainings, forming coffee mentors in the community and establishment of model farm. Rejuvenation
program was encourage to old coffee plant and promotion of intercropping of coffee was promoted. It also started
distribution of quality planting materials to coffee growers.

Table 3.7.4 Average Production in the Philippines/ Northern Mindanao/ Misamis Oriental CY2018-2022
(in Mt./Hectare)

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Philippines 0.53 0.54 0.54 0.54 053
Northern Mindanao 0.49 0.50 0.58 0.54 0.54
Misamis Oriental 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.34

In the province the biggest producer of coffee is in Gingoog City, Claveria and Balingasag base on the data submitted
by the LGUs during the consultative workshop in the updating of PCIP.

Table 3.7.4 Population, Poverty Incidence, Area Harvested, No. of Farmers Engaged, Production CY2022
And Expansion Area in Coffee of Misamis Oriental by Municipality/City

Existing Expansion
Municipality Population Poverty No. of Area Production Area
Incidence Farmers Harvested (Mt.) (HA)
Magsaysay 36,803 25.8 40 20 10
Gingoog City 136,698 22.7 600 530 174 600
Medina 35,612 18.2 55 25 15
Talisayan 25,761 19.9 9 15 10
Balingoan 11,020 18.5 5 6 4
Kinoguitan 14,091 17.1 75 50 15 50
Sugbongcogon 9,764 17.9 20 16 10
Binuangan 7,441 17.1
Salay 29,998 17.3 65 47 13
Lagonglong 24,190 18.9 40 34 8
Balingasag 74,385 20.1 180 161 62 150
Jasaan 57,055 16.7 35 28 8
Villanueva 40,419 16.0 40 20 5
Claveria 52,478 22.1 300 227 70.37 300
Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 8 5 2
Opol 66,327 12.7 20 8 2
Municipality/City Existing Expansion
Population Poverty No. of Area Production Area
Incidence Farmers Harvested (Mt.) (HA)
El Salvador 58,771 13.3

111-coffee-260
 Alubijid 32,163 14.9 22 14 2
Laguindingan 26,363 15.2
Gitagum 17,920 15.8
Libertad 12,948 17.9
Initao 33,902 17.0
Naawan 22,444 16.7 8 7 2
Manticao 29,469 17.7 20 15 3
Lugait 20,559 14.1
Misamis Oriental
957,900 21.4 1,542 1,228 415.37 1,100

Figure 3.7.2 Commodity Map of Coffee in Misamis Oriental

3.7.2 Coffee Industry Strategic Development Directions and Investment Plan

Investment Plan

The growth of coffee industry in Misamis Oriental has significant share in its economic growth particularly in the
agriculture sector. It addresses the increasing local demand of coffee specifically on soluble or single-served coffee
mixes. Misamis oriental has taken advantage of its geographical condition considering that some of the area in the
province has high elevations and the soil is suitable to Arabica variety where it is lucrative. Other advantage of the
province is the presence of big buyers the Nestle Philippines Inc. and consolidators, strong Coffee Growers Association
plus establishment of coffee shops.

Robusta and excels which is also suitable in the province local economy and agricultural productivity is among the
development thrusts of Gov. Peter M. Unabia. In order to sustain the gains on the upward growth of the coffee industry,

111-coffee-261
 it requires strategic development initiatives. These initiatives shall be focused on developing /improving the value chain
of coffee industry in the province and improving its road networks. Also, strengthening the capacities of the local
farmers, provide infrastructure facilities and collaborate with other stakeholders.

Coffee Industry Strategic Development Directions

The increasing trend of coffee production should progress until it becomes self-sufficient and able to participate in the
export market. The strategic development directions will pursue an inclusive growth models thru value chain approach,
improve farm productivity, and enhance farmers’ technical capability and skills that will sustain increases in yields and
incomes that can create avenues for food security and poverty alleviation. Below are some of the strategic development
directions of the province:

 Strengthening of the existing Coffee Growers Association and capacitate then to be Entrepreneur.
 Identify, organize, capacitate coffee farmers, IPs, and other coffee enthusiast, and implement appropriate
interventions, in order to increase coffee production in the province.
 Provide financial loans to farmers that is accessible and available, create guarantee funds, and crop insurance
for coffee farmers and cooperatives;
 Provide incentives for coffee seedling propagators, coffee farm establishment and farmers that can produced
quality coffee beans.
 Improve and established necessary infrastructure and other support facilities and services that aims to make
green coffee beans production more competitive.
 Reduce vulnerability of subsistence and marginal farmers thru subsidized and diversified livelihood support
services.
 Promote contribution to ecological balance and environmental sustainability.

3.7.3 Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability Analysis (EVSA): Coffee

The expanded vulnerability sustainability assessment (EVSA) for green coffee in Misamis Oriental include the following
parameters, 50% soil suitability, 10% area planted, 10% production volume of the commodity, 10% number of farmers
engaged in green coffee, 15% poverty incidence and 5% population in determining the ranking of areas where the
commodity is most suitable to be propagated and its value chain developed. An area with new composite index of
0.400 is most suitable for green coffee production.

Result of the EVSA for the green coffee commodity is presented in the Table 3.7.6 recorded the area suitable for green
coffee production. Base on the computation of EVSA Misamis Oriental is suitable for green coffee production because
almost all the municipalities and cities of the province new composite index is above 0.4000 except Lugait, Opol,
Lagonglong, Balingoan and Binuangan. The top five (5) municipalities suitable for green coffee are Gingoog City,
Balingasag, Claveria, Laguindingan and Magsaysay.

Table 3.7.5 EVSA Results of Coffee in Misamis Oriental

Municipality Population Poverty Area No. of Production Old Old New New Geo Code
Incidence Planted Farmer Composi Rank Composite Rank
te Index Index
GINGOOG CITY 136,698 22.7 600 1,130 174 0.4659 25 0.71493 1 104308000
BALINGASAG 74,385 20.1 180 311 62 0.5924 12 0.53342 2 104302000
CLAVERIA 52,478 22.1 300 527 70.37 0.4747 24 0.52212 3 104306000
LAGUINDINGAN 26,363 15.2 0 0 0 0.76 1 0.47801 4 104314000
MAGSAYSAY 36,803 25.8 40 20 10 0.5736 15 0.46445 5 104317000
TAGOLOAN 80,319 16.8 8 5 2 0.6582 6 0.45907 6 104324000
VILLANUEVA 40,419 16 40 20 5 0.6731 5 0.45566 7 104326000
INITAO 33,902 17 0 0 0 0.6763 4 0.44939 8 104310000
LIBERTAD 12,948 17.9 0 0 0 0.6766 3 0.44711 9 104315000
GITAGUM 17,920 15.8 0 0 0 0.6967 2 0.44676 10 104309000
ALUBIJID 32,163 14.9 22 14 2 0.6539 7 0.4314 11 104301000
JASAAN 57,055 16.7 35 28 8 0.5763 14 0.41902 12 104311000

111-coffee-262
Municipality Population Poverty Area No. of Production Old Old New New Geo Code
Incidence Planted Farmer Composi Rank Composite Rank
te Index Index
KINOGUITAN 14,091 17.1 75 100 15 0.556 17 0.41254 13 104312000
NAAWAN 22,444 16.7 8 7 2 0.603 10 0.4099 14 104320000
EL SALVADOR 58,771 13.3 0 0 0 0.6188 9 0.40823 15 104307000
TALISAYAN 25,761 19.9 9 15 10 0.5475 19 0.40745 16 104325000
MANTICAO 29,469 17.7 20 15 3 0.5719 16 0.40602 17 104318000
SUGBONGCOGON 9,764 19.9 20 16 10 0.5483 18 0.40392 18 104323000
SALAY 29,998 17.3 65 47 13 0.536 21 0.40201 19 104322000
MEDINA 35,612 18.2 55 25 15 0.5237 22 0.40069 20 104319000
LUGAIT 20,559 14.1 0 0 0 0.6201 8 0.39955 21 104316000
OPOL 66,327 12.7 20 8 2 0.5852 13 0.39589 22 104321000
LAGONGLONG 24,190 18.9 40 34 8 0.5212 23 0.39361 23 104313000
BALINGOAN 11,020 18.5 5 6 4 0.5212 23 0.37585 24 104303000
BINUANGAN 7,441 17.1 0 0 0 0.5429 20 0.37359 25 104304000

Figure 3.7.3 EVSA Map of Coffee in Misamis Oriental

111-coffee-263
 Gap Matrix Green Coffee Value chain in Misamis Oriental

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & VC Development in the Potential Intervention O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Risk Management Lead & 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
Services Province Sub other
MF Players
O
INPUT PROVISION
Lack of quality Provision of quality 11,500 seedling will Gingoog Kinoguitan/ Pest & Use planting DA/ 4,500 1,500 DA/ PLGU/
planting materials planting materials be distributed tru City / Balingasag Diseases materials that PLGU/ MLGU/ PO
thru subsidy or plant now pay later Claveria resistant to MLGU/
Limited access of Plant Now Pay later Produced high pest and PO 4,500 1,500
high yielding yielding and disease- diseases
planting materials free coffee seedlings
within the
proximity of coffee
production
Establishment of high Establishment of 1,000 1,000
yielding/quality Coffee nursery in
coffee seedlings strategic location
nursery
Provision of Farm Tools distributed to
Tools in support to nursery operators
nursery operation
Lack of quality Encourage farmers 16 bags of organic Gingoog Kinoguitan/ Uncertain Extensive 13,500 3,000
organic fertilizer to adopt sustainable fertilizer distributed City/ Balingasag ty on the promotion /info
farming thru organic thru buy now pay Claveria use of dissemination
farming thru fertilizer later organic
subsidy program fertilizer
Capacity building on Establishment of in lieu of
organic fertilizer organic producers/ commerc
production suppliers ial
fertilizer

111-coffee-264
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Propose Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & VC Development in the Potential Intervention O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management d Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
Services Province Sub & other
MF Players
O
Available supply of Gingoog Magsaysay Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ DA/ 13,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 DA/ PLGU/
organic fertilizer- City/ / Medina/ Sugbongco Tagoloan/ PLGU/ MLGU/ PO
PLGU to purchase Claveria/ Talisayan/ gon/ Alubijid/ MLGU/
the produced and Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong Naawan/ PO
distributed to coffee Balingasag salay / opol Manticao
growers thru buy now
pay later
DA-HVCDP provide Increase in the Gingoog Magsaysay Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ DA/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/PLGU/
business production of organic City/ / Medina/ Sugbongco Tagoloan/ PLGU/ MLGU/ PO
development fertilizer and increase Claveria/ Talisayan/ gon/ Alubijid/ MLGU/
assistance on the in income for Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong Naawan/ PO
viability of producing cooperative/associati Balingasag salay / opol Manticao
organic fertilizer as on of farmers
additional source of
income for
cooperative/associati
on of farmers and
source of inputs for
Hesitant to Conduct stakeholders Adaption of new Gingoog Magsaysay Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ Negative Emphasize DA/ 500 500 500 500 DA/
adapt new meeting to improve technologies of coffee City/ / Medina/ Sugbongco Tagoloan/ attitude of the benefits PLGU/ PLGU/
technology due linkages/access to production Claveria/ Talisayan/ gon/ Alubijid/ farmers of new and MLGU/ ATI/
to financial financing institutions Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong Naawan/ advanced ATI/ PO MLGU/ PO
limitation Balingasag salay / opol Manticao technologies
PRODUCTION
Decline in Offers rehabilitation Farmers are well Gingoog Magsaysay Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ Not Include in DA/ 100 100 100 100 DA/
coffee to unproductive informed and willing City/ / Medina/ Sugbongco Tagoloan/ priority of the list of PLGU/ PLGU/
production due coffee farms. to venturing into Claveria/ Talisayan/ gon/ Alubijid/ LGUs LGUs MLGU/ MLGU/
to coffee coffee farming; thus, Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong Naawan/ priority ATI/ PO ATI/ PO
rehabilitation/ increasing coffee Balingasag salay / opol Manticao
rejuvenation plantation /production

111-coffee-265
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Propose Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & VC Development in the Potential Intervention O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management d Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
Services Province Sub & other
MF Players
O
Provision of appropriate All area will be provided Gingoog Magsaysay Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ Farmers Info DA, 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA, PLGU,
machinery/ equipment / PO for borrowing City/ / Medina/ Sugbongco Tagoloan hesitant to dissemination PLGU, MLGU,
for rejuvenation scheme Claveria/ Talisayan/ gon/ / Alubijid/ under go on the MLGU, ATI/ PO
Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong Naawan/ rejuvenation importance of ATI/ PO
rejuvenation
Balingasag salay / opol Manticao
Limited Establishment of 4 Techno Demo Gingoog/ Balingasag Naawan/ Jasaan / DA, 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA, PLGU,
outreach of techno demo Claveria / Kinoguitan Opol Salay PLGU, MLGU, PO
existing showcasing GAP on MLGU,
PO
extension coffee
services and
providers
Limited Training on GAP Training on Coffee Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Farmers Giving DA, 500 500 500 500 DA, PLGU,
knowledge on coffee and GAP and sustainable hesitant in incentive to PLGU, MLGU,
GAP Coffee and sustainable farming farming system 1/ applying farmers who MLGU, PO/ ATI
year GAP adopted ATI/ PO
sustainable system
GAP
farming system
No climate Establishment of Coffee production All Coffee All coffee All coffee All coffee Flood & soil Contour DA, 100 100 100 100 DA, PLGU,
change contour farming in area must be climate areas areas areas areas erosion Farming PLGU, MLGU,
mitigation landslide areas and proof MLGU, ATI/ PO
measure for reduction of soil ATI/ PO
implemented. erosion
Poor farm to Upgrading/ Decrease on
market roads Rehabilitation/ transport cost
result to limited
and inefficient Concreting of FMR to
transport support the
services production area and
access road to the
market

111-coffee-266
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Propose Estimated Project Cost (000) Source Rank
Segments & VC Development in the Potential Intervention O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management d Lead 2023 2024 2025 2026 of Funds
Services Province Sub & other
MF Players
O
Concreting of FMR to Construction / In ability of Pass MLGUs MLGUs,
support the Upgrading of LGUs to ordinance to , PLGU, PLGU,
production area and Roads/FMR maintain collect tool DA- DA-
access road to the Concreting of Tibon- 15.23 km PRDP 580,000 PRDP
the roads fees for
market tibon –Cabalawan-
Maintenance
Mindulao-Tama FMR
with Bridge, Magsaysay

Construction of 7.000 km 189,000

Bonifacio –Mindulao
Road, Magsaysay

Construction of 11.530 Km 311,001

Mahayahay-
Katipunan-Gumabon-
Tama Road,
Magsaysay

Construction of 6.000 km 162,000

Kandiis-Tibon-Tibon
Road, Magsaysay

Construction of 10.000 km 270,000

Cabantian-Tulang-
Kauswagan-
Damayohan Road,
Magsaysay

111-coffee-267
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of Potential MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Kibungsod – 2 km MLGUs, 54,000 MLGUs,
Cabantian Circuferencial PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
Road PRDP PRDP
Concreting of Consuelo- 7 km 189,000
Abunda –Tinaan FMR
Road Concreting at Upper 11 km 297,000
Malibud to Dinawihan ,
Ginoog City
Concreting of Gingoog to 70.910 1,914,570
Claveria National Road, km.
Gingoog & Claveria
Concreting of Maanas- 8.600 km. 232,200
Kibuguing Road, Medina &
Gingoog City
Concreting of Kabug- 7.000 km. 189,000
Sidlakan Road, Medina &
Gingoog City
Concreting of San Luis – 5.500 km. 148,500
Kibuging Road, Gingoog
City
Bulwa – Mananum Bag-o 81,000
FMR, Medina 3 Km
Pahindong – Macopa FMR, 81,000
Medina 3 km
Bangbang Sidlakan FMR, 81,000
3 Km
Medina
Tupon- Maanas-San 81,000
Vicente-Maanyag FMR, 3 km
Medina
San Vicente – Kiiwang FMR, 2 Km 54,000
Medina

111-coffee-268
 San Vicente – Sidlakan 2 Km 54,000
FMR, Medina

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Manamum 6.5 km PCA, MLGUs, 174,000 PCA,
–Daan-Kabol-Kabol FMR PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
with Bridge - Medina PRDP PLGU, DA,
San Roque FMR, Medina 3 KM 81,000 PRDP
Mimbolo - Natugod FMR, 81,000
3 Km
Medina
Maanas – San Vicente 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
San Isidro – Labas 81,000
3 Km
Pagsama FMR , Medina
Concreting of 10 km 240,000
Pangpangon-Putting
Balas-Sibantang-
Mahayahay FMR -
Talisayan
Concreting of Bugdang 2 km 54,000
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Minlimaw- 5 km 135,000
Mahayag FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,00
Mandahilag-Macopa FMR, 0
Talisayan
Concreting of Poblacion – 2 km 54,000
Sindangan FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Pook- 7 km 189,00
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan 0
Concreting of San Jose – 6 km 162,00
Bugdang –Mahayag FMR, 0
Talisayan
Concreting of Mintabon – 5 km 135,000
Sibantang FMR,

111-coffee-269
 Talisayan
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.726 46,602
Pob. FMR, Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Sumalag – 2.11 km 56,970
Calubo, Kinoguitan
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub & other Players Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO
Upgrading of Calabo- 1.16 PCA, MLGUs, 31,320 PCA,
Kitotok FMR, Kinoguitan km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Concreting of Mimbule to 1.80 km 48,000
Saray FMR-Salay
Concreting of Kalongonan 10 Km 200,000
Kandal FMR, Salay
Concreting of Alipuaton- 4 km 120,,000
Bunal FMR- Salay
Concreting of Matampa 1.5 km 40,500
FMR-Salay
Concreting of Saray- 10 km 200,000
Mimbalite –Matampa FMR,
Salay
Construction of FMR with 4 0.75 km 54,000
Barrels Box Cluvert at
Salay River II, Salay
Concreting of Looc- 3.000 90,000
Tinagaan FMR, Salay km
Concreting of Mananum- 1.6 km 43,961
Claveria FMR with Bridge,
Balingasag
Concreting of Kibalua FMR, 4.3 km 116,500
Balingasag
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 125,500
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad km
FMR, Balingasag
Upgrading of Domagooc to 4.000 108,000
SitioPatrocenio FMR, km.

111-coffee-270
 Jasaan
Upgrading of Solana to 3.000 81,000
Sitio Looc FMR, Jasaan km.
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Potential Intervention Sub & other Players Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO
Concreting of San Nicolas- 16 PCA, MLGUs, 432,000 PCA,
Upper Antonio-IS-Cruz km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Road, Jasaan PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Upgrading of SitioKatu-an, 5.000 135,000
Natubo – Kimamaon km.
Kimaya FMR, Jasaan
Upgrading of San Antonio 6.000 162,000
to Sitio Cogon FMR, km.
Jasaan
Concreting of Sitio Bato, 4 km 320,000
Brgy kimaya- Villanueva
Upgrading of Dawayan-
Lokong-Crossing 3.745 101,126
4 km
Mambuaya FMR,
Villanueva
Construction of FMR with 0.61 km 85,000
slope Protection and sheet
piles (300 meters long) in
Sitio Macusi, Brgy. Kimaya,
Villanueva
Concreting of Cebukawon 4 km 320,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Nasalaban – 2 km 54,000
Subaya FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Natumolan- 4 km 120,000
Maribojoc FMR, Tagolan
Rehabilitation of Rosario 3 km 90,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Danao FMR, 5 km 150,000
Tagoloan
Concreting of Rosario – 2.2 176,000

111-coffee-271
 Comocomo FMR, Tagoloan km
Concreting of Kalongonan- 10 km 300,000
Kandal FMR, El Salvador

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention / Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province Sub Players
MFO
Lacapon-Tugasnon Sitio 5.62 PCA, MLGUs, 168,600 PCA,
Bato (Hot Spring) km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Seriwagan Sungay Road, PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Alubijid
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) – 10km 300,000
Tugasnon- San Fransisco
de Asis, El Salvador
Spring Road, Laguindingan 0.79 km 21,330
Upgrading of Madrid-Lapad 1.628 43,956
Road , Laguindingan km
Upgrading of Lapad – 80,595
2.985
Sikiton Road-Lourdes Brgy.
km
Road , Laguindingan
Upgrading of Lapad- 0.5 km 13,500
Aromahon-Nob Road,
Laguindingan
Salcedo Hills Drive Road , 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Sitio Eba Road , 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Tangke Road, 10,800
0.4 km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot Spring Road, 26,460
0.98 km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot Alongan Road, 35,100
1.3 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Pagangon Road, 3 km 81,000

111-coffee-272
 Laguindingan
Gasi Clarin Road , 75,600
2.8 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Pitogo Road, 25,920
0.96 km
Laguindingan
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of Potential MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Pavement Road PCA, MLGUs, 8,700 PCA,
(Prk 4) to Existing Concrete 700 PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Pavement (Prk 6), Pob. meter PRDP PLGU,
Gitagum DA,
Construction / Concreting of 7,600 PRDP
800
FMR P3A Talao-to C.P.
meter
Gracia, Gitagum
Upgrading of Puga-an – 48,600
1.8 km
Bitaugon FMR , Libertad
Upgrading of Gimampang-
Aluna-Casilihon FMR- Initao 3.02 km 81,540

Upgrading/Concreting of
6 km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR, Initao
Upgrading of Sapong- 5.51
km 148,770
Mamiguis-Bansilang FMR-
Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 6 Km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR, Initao
Upgrading/ Concreting of 7 km 189,000
Sinalac-Lulang FMR, Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Calacapan Calanyugan-
Kimalok FMR, Initao

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Upgrading/ Concreting of 2 km PCA, MLGUs, 54,000 PCA,

111-coffee-273
 Oguis-Bandrera FMR, PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Initao PRDP PLGU,
Upgrading/Concreting of 3 km 84,000 DA,
Cogon Tawan-tawan – PRDP
Aluna FMR, Initao
Tuboran to Aluna FMR, 1.5 km 45,000
Naawan
Bangcalon to Tuboran 2.5 km 75,000
FMR, Naawan
Linangkayan Highway to 4 km 120,000
Don Pedro FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Poblacion to 7 km 210,000
Patag FMR, Naawan
Mat-I Linugos to Tagbalogo 6 km 180,000
FMR, Naawan
Don Pedro to Digcamara 3 km 90,000
FMR, Naawan
Lapad to Tuboran Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Purok 3 Mapulog to 3 km 90,000
Tagbalogo FMR,
Naawan
Digcamara Mapulog to 2 km 60,000
Cabilin Road, Naawan
Mapulog P2 to Banatihon 5.5 km 160,000
Road, Naawan
Concreting of Mapulog – 4 km 92,400
Tuboran FMR with Arc
bridges component,
Naawan
Concreting of Suwa-Bangko 4.58 km 137,400
Lubilan FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Mat-I Lubilan 8.27 km 165,400
FMR, Naawan
Lubilan to Mambuntan 3 km 90,000
Road, Naawan
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Mat-I to Pasagdihon FMR, 3 km PCA, MLGUs, 90,000 PCA,

111-coffee-274
 Naawan PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Centro Don Pedro to 2.309 km 60,500
Macawa Road, Naawan
Lubilan to Mahanggub 2 km 60,000
Road, Naawan
Tagbalogo P8 to 4 km 120,000
Pasagdihon FMR, Naawan
Don Pedro to Linangkayan 2 km 60,000
FMR, Naawan
Mapulog P6 to P8 FMR, 5 KM 150,000
Naawan
Maputi P8 to P12 FMR, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Maputi to Tuboran, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Concreting of FMR Along 3 km 90,000
Purok 5-A & Purok 5-B of
Brgy. Pagawan, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 4 km 120,000
Sitio Donque, Upper
Malibog, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 5 km 150,000
Barangay Balintad,
Manticao
Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 54,000
Sambuyaan Road, km
Manticao
Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km 97,200
Kolambugan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players

111-coffee-275
 Concreting of Magpait – 2.50 PCA, MLGUs, 67,500 PCA,
Camanga Road, km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Manticao PRDP PLGU,
Concreting of Tuod- 3.00 81,000 DA,
Pagangon Road, km PRDP
Manticao
Concreting 0.70 18,900
PanianganBrgy. Road, km
Manticao
Concreting TuodPurok 0.50 13,500
7 , Manticao km
Concreting of Balintad – 1.5 km 40,000
Victory Road, Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Mahayahay – Kilablab, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Mahayahay – Limonda, km
Manticao
Concreting of Donque 3.00 81,000
Hill, Manticao km
Concreting of Bagares 0.50 13,500
St., Manticao km
Concreting of Sabuero 0.30 8,100
St., Manticao km
Concreting of Cementery 0.30 8,100
Road, Manticao km
Concreting of Mahayag- 3.50 94,500
Digkilaan, Manticao km
Concreting of Sagyawan 3.00 81,000
– Malibato, Manticao km

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in of Potential Sub Management Lead & Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province Intervention MFO other

111-coffee-276
 Players
POST – HARVEST/ PROCESSING
Limited access to The Department of Postharvest Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ Maintenanc Strict DA-PRDP/ 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 DA-
adequate Trade and Industry facilities City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ e/ selection of DTI / PRDP/
postharvest grants share service constructed Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ sustainabilit POs to handle DOST/ DTI /
facilities facilities that can be Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/ y of the the facility PLGU/ DOST/
provided
used by farmers to Balingasag salay opol Manticao facility must be MLGU/ PO PLGU/
produce green coffee active and MLGU/
beans has the PO
Provision of modular capability to
all-weather dryer manage &
Construction of Multi- maintain the
Purpose Drying facility
Payment with ware
house
Establishment/ Gingoog Balingasag 300,000 150,000
Construction of City/
Coffee Village Type Claveria
Processing and
Marketing
Insufficient Construction of Sufficient supply Claveria - 1 Alubijid – 1 Maintenanc Must be 320,000 350,000
Potable water in Potable water System of water in the lot lot e of included in
the Processing processing facility facilities the LGU/ PO
Area maintenance
cost
Lack of access Establishment of 4 GMP compliant Gingoog Balingasag/ 10,000 5,000
to facilities to GMP compliant CSF established City/ Kinoguitan
consistently common service Claveria
produce high facilities (CSF) for
quality dry fermentation, drying,
beans packing, storage, and
transport services

Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank

111-coffee-277
Segments & in VC Development in of Potential Sub 2023 2024 2025 2026 Managem & other Players 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
Services the Province Intervention MFO ent
Limited know- Training on GMP Once a year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ ATI/ DTI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ ATI/
how and skills and sustainable PLGU/ DTI/ PLGU/
MLGU/PO MLGU/PO
on Good production
Manufacturing
Practices
(GMP) and
Sustainable
Production
MARKETING
Weak Continuing capacity Sustained Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ DA, PLGU/ 200 200 200 200 DA, PLGU/
organizational development, farmers’ City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ SUCs, FCAs LGU, SUCs,
Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ FCAs
and financial values re- association and Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/
management orientation, increased Balingasag salay opol Manticao
among coffee leadership and income and
farmers financial assets
associations management skills
and
cooperatives
Unable to Clustering of coffee Facilitation in Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ DA/ PLGU/ DA/ PLGU/
meet supply farmers in the clustering of City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ MLGU/ DTI/ MLGU/ DTI/
Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ PO PO
volume barangays barangay Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/
requirement of Balingasag salay opol Manticao
buyers for Expand production Promotion in Gingoog Kinoguitan /
Arabica coffee area of Arabica developing City/ Balingasag
Claveria
farmers/ coffee expansion area
assemblers. 1,100 hectares
Establishment of 4 Trading Post DA-PRDP/ 300,000 300,000 DA-PRDP/
Trading Post LGU/MLGU LGU/MLGU

111-coffee-278
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in of Potential Sub Managem & other Players Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province Intervention MFO ent
To many Establishment of Lessen Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ PRDP-DA, 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 PRDP-
“middlemen” in buying stations in the transportation City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ PLGU/ MLGU/ DA,
between far flung barangays cost of farmers, Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ PO PLGU/
farmers/ improved access Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/ MLGU/
assemblers of to market Balingasag salay opol Manticao PO
robusta GCB Provision of 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
and buyers hauling trucks
which results to Contract Growing Promoted PLGU/ MLGU / PLGU/
low buying price. Contract PO MLGU /
PO
Growing
Lack of Training on Once a year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ ATI/
entrepreneuria entrepreneurial PLGU/ MLGU/ PLGU/
PO MLGU/
l skills skills PO
TRANSFORMATION
Limited Provision of PHF Produced high Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ DA-PRDP/ 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 DA-
access to quality of coffee City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ DTI/ PLGU/ PRDP/
Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ MLGU/ PO DTI/
adequate beans resulting Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/ PLGU/
postharvest to high price Balingasag salay opol Manticao MLGU/
facilities/ Provision of Fermentation, Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 PO
coffee fermentation facility, roasting & City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/
roasting and grinding Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/
processing grinding Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/
facilities facilities Balingasag salay opol Manticao
provided

111-coffee-279
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & VC Development in the Potential O/ Managem & other Players Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services Province Intervention Sub ent
MF
O
Promote Local Immediate and Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ MLGU/ PLGU/ MLGU/
Integrated Coffee Base Alternative market City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ PO PLGU/
Enterprise that will provided for coffee Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ PO
Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/
provide immediate and producers
Balingasag salay opol Manticao
alternative market for
coffee producers
Provide technical Technical Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ MLGU/ PLGU/ MLGU/
support/assistance to support/assistance City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ PO PLGU/
Proponent Group (PG) provided to PG Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ PO
Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/
in order to avail project
Balingasag salay opol Manticao
funds
Provide financial Establishment of Gingoog Balingasag / DA-PRDP/ 300,000 300,000 DA-
Support to Integrated Coffee Processing City/ Kinoguitan DTI/ PLGU/ PRDP/
Coffee-Based and Marketing Claveria/ MLGU/ PO DTI/
PLGU/
Enterprise to qualified
MLGU/
PG in a form of PO
counterpart or equity to
avail of national/foreign
funded projects in the
construction of
Processing Center
Provision of appropriate Provision of solsr Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ DA-PRDP/ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA-
coffee post-harvest & dries/ depulper City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ DTI/ PLGU/ PRDP/
processing equipment /dehuller /roasting Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ MLGU/ PO DTI/
Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/ PLGU/
and machineries machine / grinding
Balingasag salay opol Manticao MLGU/
machine, coffee PO
milling machine/
coffee berry dryer
Ware House Gingoog city Claveria Balingasag Kinoguitan 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000

111-coffee-280
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & VC Development in the Potential O/ Managem & other Players Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services Province Intervention Sub ent
MF
O
LOGISTICS
Limited Conduct SOA on coffee Once a year Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ DA/ ATI/ DTI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/
access to production City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ MLGU/ PLGU DTI/
effective Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ MLGU/
Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/ PLGU
capacity
Balingasag salay opol Manticao
building
Establishment of demo- 5 site Gingoog Balingasag/ Opol DA/ ATI/ DTI/ 500 500 250 DA/ ATI/
program City/ Kinoguitan MLGU/ PLGU DTI/
farms
aimed at Claveria MLGU/
increasing the Conduct of Field Day Gingoog Balingasag/ Opol 300 300 150 PLGU
awareness City/ Kinoguitan
and adoption Claveria
Distribution of IEC Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ 500 500 500 500
Materials City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/
Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/
Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/
Balingasag salay opol Manticao
Unpredictable Conduct IEC on Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/
weather Climate Change City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/
condition Adaptation & Mitigation Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/
Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/
affects farm
Balingasag salay opol Manticao
productivity

111-coffee-281
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint in Brief Description of MF Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & VC Development in the Potential O/ Managem & other Players Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services Province Intervention Sub ent
MF
O
POLICY
Absence of Establish a centralized Gingoog Magsaysay/ Kinoguitan/ Jasaan/ DA/ ATI/ DTI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/
Information information database City/ Medina/ Sugbongcog Tagoloan/ MLGU/ PLGU DTI/
Management system for the coffee Claveria/ Talisayan/ on/ Alubijid/ MLGU/
Kinoguitan/ Balingoan/ Lagonglong / Naawan/ PLGU
System of the industry in the province
Balingasag salay opol Manticao
entire coffee to facilitate easy access
industry in of industry information
Mindanao to all players in the
resulted to value chain
farmers’ development
limited
knowledge/un
derstanding
on price and
demand and
supply at a
given time
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
Inadequate Capacitate AEWs to Capacitated AEWs Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ATI/DTI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ATI/
research and conduct research and PLGU/ MLGU DTI/
development development in Coffee PLGU/
MLGU
initiatives on
Coffee among
AEWs

111-coffee-282
III. PRIORITY COMMODITY CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

Commodity Value Chain 8: Dairy Cattle

Dairy Cattle

Dairy Products

Milk Bars Flavor Milk Fresh Milk

III Dairy Milk-283

3.8 Commodity Value Chain 8: Dairy Cattle

3.8.1 Commodity Profile

Dairy cattle are cattle cows bred for the ability to produce large quantities of milk, from which dairy products
are made. Dairy cows may be found either in herds or dairy farms where dairy farmers own, manage, care
for, and collect milk from them, or on commercial farms. Herd sizes vary around the world depending on
landholding culture and social structure. Compared with other dairy animals, cattle present many advantages
in terms of ease of milking, udder size and the animal’s ability to store milk, and milk yield. In fact, cattle milk
constitutes the largest share of the total world milk production. In some countries almost half the milk
produced is consumed as fresh pasteurized whole, low-fat, or skim milk. However, most milk is manufactured
into more stable dairy products of worldwide commerce, such as butter, cheese, dried milks, ice cream, and
condensed milk.

Dairy milk is widely produced in developed countries than the developing countries due to poor performance
in small-scale dairy systems, high ambient temperature, humidity, low quality feed, low levels of concentrate
supplementation, indigenous cattle breeds, and high incidence of disease. United State of America is the
world’s largest milk producer, with 18.96 percent of the 588 million tons global production in 2020 followed by
India, Brazil, China, and Germany (FAO).

The Philippines dairy supply situation for 2021 is characterized by increasing local milk production and
decreasing imports and exports of milk and dairy products. The net supply stood at 26.30 thousand MT. lower
than last year’s net supply of 26.71 thousand MT. Local production decline by 1.5% (from 26.71 million liters
to 26.30 million liters) while imports up by 3% (from 2.94 million MT to 3.04 million MT) and Exports up to
44% (from 35.81 thousand MT to 51.42 thousand MT) (NDA). Total dairy production reached 26.30 thousand
MT-level and grossed more than P1, 408 million at current prices. Local milk production comes from the dairy
animal (herd) inventory of 69,696 head. Of this inventory, dairy cattle registered a number of 24,252 head
and the number of dairy carabaos reached to 17,907 head. By animal source, 61% of the total volume of milk
produced came from dairy cattle, 32% from carabao and 7% from goat. Based on the report of the Philippine
Statistical Authority (PSA), the significant uptrend of milk production was noted in Mindanao areas, thus,
resulted into higher milk production and better pricing.

Figure 3.8.1 shows the dairy production performance of the Philippines from 2017 to 2021. Production
gradually increasing from 2017 to 2020 then slightly decreases in 2021. In 2022 the annual production of
dairy milk in the Philippines was 30,281.05 MT. an increase of 15% and about 3,633.11 MT or 12% was
coming from Northern Mindanao.

In the Philippines cattle production in 2021, top most milk producing province is Batangas with 4.1 thousand
Mt., followed by Bukidnon with 2.8 thousand MT. also Laguna, Bulacan and Iloilo shared great number of
milk production in the country ranging from 1.5 to 1.2 thousand MT. Bukidnon estimated to have more than
13 % contribution in country milk production (NDA).

III Dairy Milk-284

Misamis Oriental is the 2nd diary milk producer in Northern Mindanao. The province has strong/ active dairy
cooperative the Northern Mindanao Federation of Dairy Cooperative the Owner of High Fresh Dairy Milk
Processing Plant in El Salvador City, Misamis oriental. The Coop was able to avail in the PRDP the
Enhancement of Dairy Processing and Marketing project. Thus, at present their products self’s life is from 1
week to 1 month plus refrigerated van.

Figure 3.8.1 DAIRY PRODUCTION (MT) IN THE PHILIPPINES

(2017 TO 2021)

Dairy Milk and be process into several products, the following product description of dairy milk and
other dairy products

 Raw milk This is the type of milk directly extracted from dairy animals including cattle,
goat, carabao, or sheep. This raw form is the type that has not been pasteurized
or homogenized.

 Fresh Milk Fresh milk is a milk product made wholly or partly blended with other fresh dairy
(PNS FreshMilk) high quality milk produced by the dairy farms or individual farmers.

 Fresh Cow’s Milk Normal mammary secretion obtained by the complete milking of one or more
(PNS Fresh Milk) healthy cows, free from colostrum, without either addition to it, or extraction from
it, has undergone heat processing, intended for consumption as liquid milk or for
further processing. It is composed of 3% milkfat, and 8.25% milk solids not fat.

III Dairy Milk-285

 Pasteurized Milk Milk which has been subjected to a temperature not lower than 63oC (145oF)
and holding it continuously at that temperature for not less than 30 minutes or at
least 72oC (161oF) and holding it at that temperature for at least 15 seconds.
Pasteurization is a sanitation process in which milk is heated briefly to a
temperature high enough to kill pathogens (disease – causing microorganisms
that ay be present in raw milk) followed by rapid cooling.

 Whole Milk Milk from which milk fat has not been extracted.

 Low-fat Milk Milk from which sufficient milk fat has been removed to reduce its milk fat
content to not less than 0.50% and not more than 2.00%

 Toned Milk Made using either high fat, cow or carabao milk and added with fresh skim milk
and standardized at 3.0% milk fat.

 Homogenized Milk Defined as milk which has been treated in such manner as to ensure break-up
of the fat globules to such an extent that after 43 hours of quiescent storage at
7oC, no visible cream separation occurs on the milk and the fat percentage of
the top 100 cc of milk in containers does not differ by more than 10%.

 Sterilized Milk Milk that has been heated without concentration or appreciable loss of volume to
a temperature of at least 100oC for a length of time to kill the all the organisms
present and delivered to the consumer in hermetically sealed containers.

 Flavoured Milk Flavored milk consists of milk, flavoring material and sugar. Flavors vary with
local preference. These are consumed by those who would not drink milk alone.

 Cream It is that portion of milk rich in fat that rests on top of the milk while standing, or is
separated by means of centrifugal separator. When it is intended for direct
consumption rather than in the manufacture of butter or ice cream, it is called
market cream.

 Butter Mixture of milk fat, buttermilk, and water usually with salt and added color. Its
composition varies according to the method of manufacture and whether it is
made from sweet or sour cream. It contains not less than 80% of milk fat by
weight, not more than 2% of milk solids-non-fat by weight and not more than
16% water by weight.

 Buttermilk Fluid product resulting from the manufacture of butter from milk or cream. It
contains not less than 8.25% of milk solids-non-fat.

 Cheese Curd or substance formed by the coagulation of the milk of certain mammals by
rennet or certain enzymes in the presence of lactic acid produced by added or
adventitious microorganisms from which part of the moisture has been removed

III Dairy Milk-286

 by cutting, warming and/or pressing, which has been shaped in a mold, and then
ripened by holding for some time at suitable temperatures and humidity.

 Cottage Cheese, Dry Soft uncured cheese prepared from sweet skim milk, concentrated skim milk,
Curd or Dry Curd and non-fat dry milk by the action of harmless lactic acid-producing bacteria with
Cottage Cheese or without rennet or other safe and suitable milk clotting enzyme. Calcium
chloride may be added in a quantity of not more than 0.02% of the weight of the
milk. The finished food contains less than 0.5% milk fat.

 Yogurt Have an acid flavor and a smooth and light custard texture. The lactic
fermentation of yoghurt is accomplished by using Streptococcus thermophiles
and Lactobacillus bulgaricus growing symbiotically. These microorganisms are
extremely sensitive to penicillin. Hence, it is necessary to carefully select
antibiotic-free milk for manufacture of yoghurt.

 Milk-based Probiotics The term probiotic is currently used to refer to ingested microorganisms
associated with beneficial effects to humans and animals. For purposes of this
study, discussions are limited to milk-based probiotics.

 Yema, Pastillas, other Philippine milk-based delicacies and candies often taken as snack and/or
milk candies dessert.

Figure 3.8.2 Utilization of Raw Milk

III Dairy Milk-287

Production Performance

Base on PSA records there was no available data from 2018 to 2020

Table 3.8.1 MILK PRODUCTION (MT) IN THE PHILIPPINES, NORTHERN MINDANAO AND MISAMIS
OREINTAL CY2017-2022

2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Philippines 26,300.00 30,281.05
Northern Mindanao 3,156.00 3,633.11
Misamis Oriental 1,355.25 1,473.33
Source: Philippines & Northern Mindanao – PSA
Misamis Oriental –NDA & NMFDC

In Misamis Oriental, production area are mostly concentrated in CLAJAVETA areas because of available area for
pasture development and proximately near to Highland Fresh Dairy Processing Center the main buyer of fresh milk in
the province. In the Eastern side of the province the other dairy project was established by Gingoog City Government
and NDA. So the top 5 LGUs dairy milk producer in the province are Claveria, Opol, Balingasag, Tagoloan, Naawan and
Gingoog. Most of the farmers are encourage to venture into dairy milk production because of the presence of support
from NDA and ready buyers of milk. At present there are two (2) processing plant the Highland Fresh Processing Center
and Gingoog Dairy Milk Processing Center.

Table 3.8.2 MILK PRODUCTION (MT) IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL CY2022

III Dairy Milk-288

Municipality/City Population Poverty No. of Dairy Production (MT)
Incidence Animals
Claveria 52,478 22.1 250 502.50
Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 60 120.60
Jasaan 57,055 16.7 5 10.05
Balingasag 74,385 20.1 95 190.95
Opol 66,327 12.7 150 301.50
El Salvador 58,771 13.3 20 40.20
Laguindingan 26,363 15.2 20 40.20
Initao 33,902 17.0 3 6.03
Municipality/City Population Poverty No. of Dairy Production (MT)
Incidence Animals
Naawan 22,444 16.7 50 100.50
Manticao 29,469 17.7 25 50.25
Gingoog 136,698 22.7 50 100.50
Talisayan 25,761 19.9 5 10.50
TOTAL 733 1,473.33

Figure 3.8.3 COMMODITY MAP OF DAIRY CATTLE IN MISAMIS ORIENTAL

III Dairy Milk-289

3.8.2 Expanded Vulnerability and Suitability Assessment (EVSA) of Dairy Milk in Misamis Oriental

Base on the results computation of EVSA the most suitable area for Dairy Milk is Gingoog City. LGUs with total
index below 4.000 are Gitagum, Kinoguitan, Libertad, Balingoan, Sugbongcogon and Binuangan, which means
not suitable for dairy milk production.

Parameters
Ranking
Poverty Total
City/Municipality No. of No. of Base on
Population Incidenc No. of support Index
Heads Raisers Index
e Facilities
20% 25% 25% 10% 20%
Gingoog City 27,340 6 13 0 5 27,363 1
Tagoloan 16,064 4 15 0 6 16,089 2
Balingasag 14,877 5 24 0 2 14,908 3
Opol 13,265 3 38 0 15 13,321 4
El Salvador City 11,754 3 5 0 2 11,765 5
Jasaan 11,411 4 1 0 0 11,417 6
Claveria 10,496 6 63 0 25 10,589 7
Villanueva 8,084 4 0 0 0 8,088 8
Magsaysay 7,361 6 0 0 0 7,367 9
Medina 7,122 5 0 0 0 7,127 10
Initao 6,780 4 1 0 0 6,786 11

III Dairy Milk-290

Alubijid 6,433 4 0 0 0 6,436 12
Salay 6,000 4 0 0 0 6,004 13
Manticao 5,894 4 6 0 2 5,907 14
Languindingan 5,273 4 5 0 2 5,284 15
Talisayan 5,152 5 1 0 1 5,159 16
Lagonglong 4,838 5 0 0 0 4,843 17
Naawan 4,489 4 13 0 5 4,510 18
Lugait 4,112 4 0 0 0 4,115 19
Gitagum 3,584 4 0 0 0 3,588 20
Kinoguitan 2,818 4 0 0 0 2,823 21
Libertad 2,590 4 0 0 0 2,594 22
Balingoan 2,204 5 0 0 0 2,209 23
Sugbongcogon 1,953 4 0 0 0 1,957 24
Binuangan 1,488 4 0 0 0 1,493 25

Figure 3.1.4 EVSA Map of Dairy Cattle in Misamis

Oriental

III Dairy Milk-291

3.8.2 Commodity Strategic Development Strategic Directions and Investment Plan

3.8.3 Commodity Strategic Development Direction and Investment Plan

Investment Plan

The value chain of dairy commodity plays a vital role in the agricultural development of the province considering
that dairy farming industry is largely composed of small scale cattle growers. The small scale growers formed an
association or cooperatives. The progressive development of the industry can provide regular source of income
which in turn reduce poverty in the province, nutritious food consequently reduce malnutrition, improves the use
of resources that can assist in achieving ecologically balance environment, generates on-and off-employment,
and financial stability and asset creation consequently allows the farmers to have monetary savings.

The rising populations and changing diets will redound to increasing demand for dairy. As income increases and
presence of urbanization place, individuals tend to receive more calories from proteins (including dairy) as
opposed to basic carbohydrates (mostly grains). Considering this trend, dairy farming becomes competitive
compared to other agricultural commodities. It is therefore important that investments should include provision of
value-adding facilities, upgrading of existing dairy processing facilities and upgrading of the farm to market
roads necessary to bring the commodity from the farms to the processing plants and finally to the consumers.
Dairy Industry Strategic Development Directions

The current situation of the dairy farming industry in the province faced many challenges in input provision,
production, processing, and marketing. These challenges hamper the growth of the industry. In order for the
province to have a competitive and stable dairy cattle farming industry the strategic development directions
should be focused on inviting investors to address the production by providing quality dairy animals, plus
provision of production facilities, processing challenges and increasing its dairy production to improve quality of
life.

The Strategic development directions for dairy production will include:

 Enhance knowledge and skills of dairy cattle farmers in animal health care management and farm
management, including management of farm wastes;
 Upgrade local breeds;
 Improve the quality of milk and milk products to be able to compete in the export and domestic market;
 Encourage more farmers to engage in dairy cattle industry;
 Development of forage area;
 Increase number of dairy multiplier farms;
 Establish milk consolidators in strategic areas;
 Strengthen linkages of stakeholders and collaboration of dairy cattle farmers, processors, LGUs, NGAs and
NGOs;
 Federate small processing facilities to make it more competitive;
 Intensify product development; and
 Ensure that the dairy sector develops in a socially and environmentally responsible manner;

III Dairy Milk-292

 The Existing Dairy Processing Plant in Misamis Oriental will be more competitive with export market thru
enhancement of the facility and became the center of educational and tourist destination.
 To eliminate malnutrition thru supplemental feeding using dairy products.

III Dairy Milk-293

III Dairy Milk-294
3.8.3: PCIP Gap Matrix Dairy Product Value Chain in Misamis Oriental

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province Players
Input Provision
Insufficient number Financial support in 50 heads/year All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA, 12,500 12,500 12,500 12,500 NDA, DA,ATI,
and high cost of the procurement of Areas Areas Areas Areas DA,ATI, PLGU,
dairy cattle dairy cattle thru NDA PLGU, MLGU,PO/Fa
MLGU,PO/ rmers’
Insufficient Supply Information campaign IEC once every All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy Farmers’ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Cooperative
of forage and to utilize open and Quarter Areas Areas Areas Areas Cooperative
pasture unutilized coco areas
for pasture area.
NDA/ Institution 50 hectares/year All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy 100,000 100,00 100,000 100,000
provider of dairy Areas Areas Areas Areas
stock will not extend
assistance to farmers
without forage area
established
Establishment & 1 to 2 hectares/ All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
maintenance of barangay / 100% Areas Areas Areas Areas
communal forage of the Brgys.
area/improved established
pasture area
Provision of tractor 1 tractor with 1 Gingoog/ Villanueva/ El Alubijid/ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000
for pasture trailers truck per Claveria/ Tagoloan/ Salvador/ Gitagum/
development) & communal dairy Naawan Manticao Opol Magsaysay
trailer truck (to farm
transport
roughage) to
communal dairy
farms

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds

III Dairy Milk-295

VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province Players
Pasture lease areas 5 Pasture Lease Claveria/ Gingoog Alubijid/ Balingasag/ NDA, 5,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 NDA, DA,ATI,
must allocate lots Areas Medina/ City/ Villanueva Lagonglong DA,ATI, PLGU,
for proposed Salay/ Talisayan/ / Jasaan/ /Gitagum PLGU, MLGU,PO/
Government Opol/ El Naawan/M Manticao MLGU,PO/ Farmers’
Livestock Dairy Salvador agsaysay Farmers’ Cooperative
Farms and other Cooperative
agricultural
intended facilities
and
Limited forage Establishment & Silage/ Hay/ Claveria/ Gingoog Alubijid/ Balingasag/ NDA, 5,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 NDA, DA,ATI,
feeds supply maintenance of Haylage/(Feeds) Medina/ City/ Villanueva Lagonglong DA,ATI, PLGU,
trench type silo or availability will be Salay/ Talisayan/ / Jasaan /Gitagum PLGU, MLGU,PO/
bunker silo, sustained, Opol/ El Magsaysay MLGU,PO/ Farmers’
procurement of whole especially during Salvador Farmers’ Cooperative
crop Corn for silage long drought Cooperative
& Forage production
and preservation
Provide facilities/ 1 per area Claveria/ Gingoog Alubijid/ Balingasag/ NDA, 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 NDA, DA,ATI,
equipment (hammer Medina/ City/ Villanueva Lagonglong DA,ATI, PLGU,
mill ,feed mixers, etc) Salay/ Talisayan/ / Jasaan / Gitagum PLGU, MLGU,PO/
to dairy animal Opol/ El Magsaysay MLGU,PO/ Farmers’
raisers, association/ Salvador Farmers’ Cooperative
coops Cooperative
High Potential for Utilization of Developed Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA, 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 NDA, DA,ATI,
dairy cattle upgraded animals for cattle Areas Areas Areas Areas DA,ATI, PLGU,
production/ under- dairy production industry in the PLGU, MLGU,PO/
utilized potential province MLGU,PO/ Farmers’
areas for dairy Farmers’ Cooperative
production. Cooperative

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026

III Dairy Milk-296

Province Players
More Dairy Multiplier Increased dairy Claveria/ Gingoog Alubijid/ Balingasag/ DA/ 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 DA/
Farms (beef cattle animal production Medina/ City/ Villanueva Lagonglong NDA/PLGU/ NDA/PLGU/
farms to engage in by 5%; increased Salay/ Talisayan/ / Jasaan MLGU/ MLGU/Dairy
dairy cattle dairy milk Opol/ El Magsaysay Dairy Cooperative
production produced by 5%. Salvador Cooperative
Poor management Strict implementation Attain 98% Claveria/ Gingoog Alubijid/ Balingasag/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
resulting poor on animal health and healthy breeding Medina/ City/ Villanueva Lagonglong
resiliency of husbandry stocks Salay/ Talisayan/ / Jasaan
breeding stocks. requirement Opol/ El Magsaysay
Salvador
Limited supply of Establishment & Provide 90-98% All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
liquid Nitrogen Maintenance of sustainability of Areas Areas Areas Areas
resulting to “Provincial Liquid AI program/
decrease output in Nitrogen Plant activities
#animal
inseminated
Lack or Establishment & Assure 100% All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy DA-PRDP/ 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 DA-PRDP/
Inadequate maintenance of continued milking Areas Areas Areas Areas NDA/PLGU/ NDA/PLGU/
building facility for climate resistant barn activity & doing MLGU/ MLGU/
dairy cattle for dairy cows other farm Dairy Dairy
practices Cooperative Cooperative
throughout the
production period.
Procurement of 100% provided All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy DA/ 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 DA/
plastic drums used Areas Areas Areas Areas NDA/PLGU/ NDA/PLGU/
as feed trough & MLGU/ MLGU/
water container Dairy Dairy
Cooperative Cooperative

III Dairy Milk-297

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province Players
PRODUCTION
Low milk Technical training to 1 trainings/year All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA/ DA/ 500 500 500 500 NDA/ DA/
productivity dairy farmers on Areas Areas Areas Areas PLGU/ML PLGU/MLG
nutritional GU/ATI U/ATI
requirement of dairy
cattle
Low number of Continue Importation Improved All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA/ DA- 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 NDA/ DA-
serviceable bulls of semen straws and genetics and Areas Areas Areas Areas PRDP/ PRDP/
for semen quality breeder bull. production PLGU PLGU
collection. performance. /MLGU /MLGU
Continue to intensify 1 Trainings/ years All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA/ DA/ 500 500 500 500 NDA/ DA/
AI Program;Training Areas Areas Areas Areas PLGU/ML PLGU/MLG
of incoming LGU AI GU/ATI U/ATI
personnel, dairy
farmers and or dairy
farm worker. From
basic advanced
training course/
Insufficient milking Provision of 10 units provided All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA/ DA- 300,000 300,000 200,000 200,000 NDA/ DA-
equipment that leadsappropriate
to poor milking Areas Areas Areas Areas PRDP/ PRDP/
milk handling and equipment PLGU PLGU
intensive labor /MLGU/ /MLGU/
requirement
Few farmers Distribution of dairy Dairy dispersal All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000
engaged in dairy animals (dispersal increased by 2- Areas Areas Areas Areas
farming scheme) to 5% per year
Interested qualified
farmers

III Dairy Milk-298

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province Players
Limited area for Utilization of 10% increase in Claveria/ NDA, 20,000 NDA, PRDP,
Dairy MOPADC & areas intended PRDP,PL PLGU,
Production MOSCAT pasture for dairy cattle GU, MLGU/
area development for farming for the MLGU/ MOSCAT
dairy project succeeding year MOSCAT
and every year
after
Poor management Conduct basic dairy 1 training / year All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA/ DA/ 500 500 500 500 NDA/ DA/
due to insufficient animal production Areas Areas Areas Areas PLGU/ML PLGU/MLG
knowledge on seminar and GU/ATI U/ATI
dairy animal continuing education
production on new technologies/
updates
Non-availability of Cap dev on feed 1 training / year All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA/ DA/ 500 500 500 500 NDA/ DA/
concentrate feeds formulation; silage Areas Areas Areas Areas PLGU/ML PLGU/MLG
for dairy animals mgt. GU/ATI U/ATI
Establishment of 4 units Claveria Gingoog Naawan Manticao NDA/ DA- 500,000 500,000 500,00 500,00 NDA/ DA-
feedmill City PRDP/ PRDP/
PLGU PLGU
/MLGU/ /MLGU/
Provision of plastic 90% of the All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA/ DA/ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 NDA/ DA/
drums for storage to farmers provided Areas Areas Areas Areas PLGU/ML PLGU/MLG
individual farmers or GU/ATI U/ATI
dairy farmers
assn/coops
Construction of 4 unit Claveria Gingoog Naawan Manticao NDA/ DA- 500,000 500,000 500,00 500,00 NDA/ DA-
bunker silo City PRDP/ PRDP/
PLGU PLGU
/MLGU/ /MLGU/

III Dairy Milk-299

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the SUB/ Risk Managemen Lead & (000) Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 t Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province Players
Limited knowledge Conduct of training/ 1,training/ year All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy All Dairy NDA/ DA/ 500 500 500 500 NDA/ DA/
on dairy animal refresher course on Areas Areas Areas Areas PLGU/MLG PLGU/MLG
diseases animal diseases U/ATI U/ATI
prevention and prevention and
intervention control
PROCESSING
Ageing processing Enhancement of 1 Facility El Naawan Gingoog NDA, DA 30,000 30,000 30,000 NDA, DA
plants Dairy Processing Salvador City PRDP, PRDP,
Plant into Agri- PLGU, PLGU,
Science Tourist MLGU,PO/ MLGU,PO/
Center and Provision Farmers’ Farmers’
of Refrigerated Cooperative Cooperative
delivery van
Establishment of 1 Facility Claveria
Village Type Dairy
processing Plant and
Marketing
Lack of potable Establishment of 3 lot El Alubijid/ 500,000 300,000
water in the PWS Salvador Tagoloan/
production/ / Gingoog 4,000
processing area Claveria City

III Dairy Milk-300

VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Managemen Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 t Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
Difficulty in Establishment Concreting of Maanas- 8.600 km. NDA/ DA/ 232,200 NDA/ DA/
the delivery of of FMR Kibuguing Road, Medina & PLGU/MLG PLGU/MLG
fresh milk to Gingoog City U/ATI U/ATI
the Concreting of San Luis – 5,500 km 148,500
Processing Kibuging Road, Gingoog City
Plant due to
FMR Road Concreting at Upper 11 km 297,000
Malibud to Dinawihan ,
Ginoog City
Concreting of Gingoog to 70.910 1,914,5
Claveria National Road, km. 70
Gingoog & Claveria
Concreting of Kabug- 7.000 km. 189,000
Sidlakan Road, Medina &
Gingoog City
Concreting of Pangpangon- 10 km 240,000
Putting Balas-Sibantang-
Mahayahay FMR -Talisayan
Concreting of Bugdang FMR, 2 km 54,000
Talisayan
Concreting of Minlimaw- 5 km 135,000
Mahayag FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,000
Mandahilag-Macopa FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Poblacion – 2 km 54,000
Sindangan FMR, Talisayan

III Dairy Milk-301

VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
Concreting of Pook- 7 km 189,000
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of San Jose – 6 km 162,000
Bugdang –Mahayag FMR,
Talisayan

Concreting of Mintabon – 5 km 135,000

Sibantang FMR, Talisayan
Bulwa – Mananum Bag-o 81,000
FMR, Medina 3 Km
Pahindong – Macopa 3 km 81,000
FMR, Medina
Bangbang Sidlakan FMR, 81,000
3 Km
Medina
Tupon- Maanas-San 81,000
Vicente-Maanyag FMR, 3 km
Medina
San Vicente – Kiiwang 2 Km 54,000
FMR, Medina
San Vicente – Sidlakan 2 Km 54,000
FMR, Medina

VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank

III Dairy Milk-302

Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
MLGUs, 108,000 MLGUs,
San Jose – Hollywood PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
4KM
FMR , Medina PRDP PRDP
South Poblacion FMR , 54,000
2 Km
Medina
Mananum Bag-o - 81,000
3 Km
Baluarte FMR, Medina
Portulin – Dig-aguyan 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
Gasa - Hangaron FMR, 81,000
3 KM
Medina
Concreting of Manamum – 6.5 km 174,000
Daan-Kabol-Kabol FMR
with Bridge - Medina

San Roque FMR, Medina 3 KM 81,000

Mimbolo - Natugod FMR, 81,000
3 Km
Medina
Maanas – San Vicente 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina

III Dairy Milk-303

VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
MLGUs, 81,000 MLGUs,
San Isidro – Labas PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
3 Km
Pagsama FMR , Medina PRDP PRDP
Concreting of Mimbule to 1.80 km 48,000
Saray FMR-Salay
Concreting of Kalongonan 10 Km 200,000
Kandal FMR, Salay
Concreting of Alipuaton- 4 km 120,,00
Bunal FMR- Salay 0
Concreting of Matampa 1.5 km 40,500
FMR-Salay
Concreting of Saray- 10 km 200,000
Mimbalite –Matampa
FMR, Salay
Construction of FMR with 0.75 km 54,000
4 Barrels Box Cluvert at
Salay River II, Salay
Concreting of Looc- 3.000 km 90,000
Tinagaan FMR, Salay

III Dairy Milk-304

VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 km MLGUs, 125,500 MLGUs,
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
FMR, Balingasag PRDP PRDP
Concreting and 3 km 100,000
Rehabilitation of FMR of
Kitamban – Valdeconcha
– Mosangot Road,
Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1 km 30,000
Valdeconcha-Silad-
Ampianga FMR,
Binuangan

Construction/ Rehab of 1km 30,000

Kitambis – Kidalayon-
Membuahan FMR,
Binuangan

Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000

(Kumakaykay-
Valdechoncha-Kitamban),
Binuangan

Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000

(Gantangun-Kitambis),
Binuangan

III Dairy Milk-305

VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 km MLGUs, 125,500 MLGUs,
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
FMR, Balingasag PRDP PRDP
Concreting of Mabini – 1km 30,000
Tinagaan Road,
Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini- 1km 30,000
Tinigaan Road, Binuangan
Upgrading of Domagooc 4.000 km. 108,000
to SitioPatrocenio FMR,
Jasaan
Upgrading of Solana to 3.000 km. 81,000
Sitio Looc FMR, Jasaan
Upgrading of SitioKatu-an, 5.000 km. 135,000
Natubo – Kimamaon
Kimaya FMR, Jasaan
Upgrading of San Antonio 6.000 km. 162,000
to Sitio Cogon FMR,
Jasaan

Concreting of San 16 km 432,000

Nicolas-Upper Antonio-IS-
Cruz Road, Jasaan
VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province

III Dairy Milk-306

 Concreting of Sitio Bato, 4 km MLGUs, 320,000 MLGUs,
Brgy kimaya- Villanueva PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
PRDP PRDP
Upgrading of Dawayan-
3.7454 km 101,126
Lokong-Crossing
Mambuaya FMR,
Villanueva
Construction of FMR with 0.61 km 85,000
slope Protection and sheet
piles (300 meters long) in
Sitio Macusi, Brgy.
Kimaya, Villanueva
Concreting of Cebukawon 4 km 320,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Nasalaban – 2 km 54,000
Subaya FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Natumolan- 4 km 120,000
Maribojoc FMR, Tagolan
Rehabilitation of Rosario 3 km 90,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Danao 5 km 150,000
FMR, Tagoloan
VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
Concreting of Rosario – 2.2 km MLGUs, 176,000 MLGUs,
Comocomo FMR, PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
Tagoloan PRDP PRDP
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) 10km 300,000
Tugasnon-San Francisco
El Salvador

III Dairy Milk-307

 Concreting of 10 km 300,000
Kalongonan-Kandal FMR,
El Salvador
Lacapon-Tugasnon Sitio 5.62 km 168,600
Bato (Hot Spring)
Seriwagan Sungay Road,
Alubijid
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) – 10km 300,000
Tugasnon- San Fransisco
de Asis, El Salvador
Tuboran to Aluna FMR, 1.5 km 45,000
Naawan
Bangcalon to Tuboran FMR, 2.5 km 75,000
Naawan
Linangkayan Highway to Don 4 km 120,000
Pedro FMR, Naawan
VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
Concreting of Poblacion to 7 km MLGUs, 210,000 MLGUs,
Patag FMR, Naawan PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
PRDP PRDP
Mat-I Linugos to Tagbalogo 6 km 180,000
FMR, Naawan
Don Pedro to Digcamara 3 km 90,000
FMR, Naawan
Lapad to Tuboran Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Purok 3 Mapulog to 3 km 90,000
Tagbalogo FMR, Naawan
Digcamara Mapulog to 2 km 60,000
Cabilin Road, Naawan
Mapulog P2 to Banatihon 5.5 km 160,000
Road, Naawan

III Dairy Milk-308

 Concreting of Mapulog – 4 km 92,400
Tuboran FMR with Arc
bridges component, Naawan
Concreting of Suwa-Bangko 4.58 km 137,400
Lubilan FMR, Naawan

VCA/Key Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Gap/ Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Constraints in MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
the VC Dev’t. Players
in the
Province
Concreting of Mat-I Lubilan 8.27 km MLGUs, 165,400 MLGUs,
FMR, Naawan PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
PRDP PRDP
Lubilan to Mambuntan Road, 3 km 90,000
Naawan
Lubilan to Mahanggub Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Tagbalogo P8 to Pasagdihon 4 km 120,000
FMR, Naawan
Mat-I to Pasagdihon FMR, 3 km 90,000
Naawan
Centro Don Pedro to 2.309 km 60,500
Macawa Road, Naawan
Don Pedro to Linangkayan 2 km
FMR, Naawan
Mapulog P6 to P8 FMR, 5 KM
Naawan
Maputi P8 to P12 FMR, 4 km
Naawan
Maputi to Tuboran, 4 km
Naawan

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds

III Dairy Milk-309

VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province Players
Concreting of FMR Along 3 km MLGUs, 90,000 MLGUs,
Purok 5-A & Purok 5-B of PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
Brgy. Pagawan, Manticao PRDP PRDP
Concreting of FMR at Sitio 4 km 120,000
Donque, Upper Malibog,
Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 5 km 150,000
Barangay Balintad,
Manticao
Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 km 54,000
Sambuyaan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km 97,200
Kolambugan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao
Concreting PanianganBrgy. 0.70 km 18,900
Road, Manticao
Concreting TuodPurok 7 , 0.50 km 13,500
Manticao
Concreting of Balintad – 1.5 km 40,000
Victory Road, Manticao
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province Players
Concreting of Magpait – 2.50 km MLGUs, 67,500 MLGUs,
Camanga Road, Manticao PLGU, DA, PLGU, DA,
PRDP PRDP
Concreting of Tuod- 3.00 km 81,000
Pagangon Road, Manticao
Concreting of Mahayahay – 3.00 km 81,000
Kilablab, Manticao

III Dairy Milk-310

 Concreting of Mahayahay – 3.00 km 81,000
Limonda, Manticao
Concreting of Donque Hill, 3.00 km 81,000
Manticao
Concreting of Bagares St., 0.50 km 13,500
Manticao
Concreting of Sabuero St., 0.30 km 8,100
Manticao
Concreting of Cementery 0.30 km 8,100
Road, Manticao
Concreting of Mahayag- 3.50 km 94,500
Digkilaan, Manticao
Concreting of Sagyawan – 3.00 km 81,000
Malibato, Manticao

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the Intervention SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO 2023 2024 2025 2026 Other 2023 2024 2025 2026
Province Players
Upgrading/Concreting 5.985 179,550
Awang Road at Brgy.
Awang, Opol
Upgrading/Concreting 2.655 79,650
Giangkan Road at Brgy.
Awang, Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting 6.020 180,600
Camingawan – Lala Oro
Tapurok Road, Patag &
Malanang, Opol
Upgrading /Concreting 2.680 80,000
Binigwayan-Mala Oro
Road, Patag & Malanang,
Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting 0.615 18,450
Tulahon-Camaroc Road,
Malanang, Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting 3.875 116,250

III Dairy Milk-311

 Megdaha Road, Tingalan,
Opol
Upgrading/ Concreting Old 1.780 53,400
Tingalan Road, Opol

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Intervention Target/ MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost Source of Rank
Constraints in the VC Outcomes SUB/ Risk Management Lead & (000) Funds
Dev’t. in the Province MFO Other
Players
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
MARKETING
Dominance of spot Strengthening of 2 Cooperative El MLGUs/ 100 MLGUs/
transactions makes cooperatives strengthen Salvador PLGUs/ PLGUs/
farmers more /Gingoog CDA CDA
vulnerable to price
fluctuation.

III Dairy Milk-312

III. PRIORITY COMMODITY CHAIN DEVELOPMENT

Commodity Value Chain 9: SWINE PRODUCTION

111-swine -313
3.9 Commodity Value Chain 9: Swine

3.9.1 Commodity Profile

Swine is believed to be among the earliest animal to be domesticated, proven by paintings and carvings of pigs that
date back to 25,000 years have been found. The pig was allegedly domesticated as early as 9,000 BC from the wild
boar, which is found in the forests of Asia and Europe.

A boar is an uncast rated male domestic pig which can weigh more than 120 lbs. (54 kilograms). Female pigs or
sows give birth to offspring twice a year to litter of around 12 young that are called piglets. At birth, piglets weigh
around 2.5 lbs. (1.1 kg) which most of them double their weigh within a week. When they are two to four weeks old,
these piglets are weaned.

Pigs are mammals with stocky bodies, flat snouts, small eyes and large ears. They are highly intelligent, social
animals, and are found all over the world. Both feral and domestic pigs are opportunistic omnivores, content to eat
whatever is provided. Domestic pigs are fed a mix of dry and wet foods by farmers that encourage them to grow very
large.

Global

Pigs or swine have been grown worldwide. China is the top country by number of pigs in the world. As of 2022,
number of pigs in China was almost 449 million heads that accounts for more than half or 57.29 percent of the
world’s number of pigs. The countries involve are European Union, United States, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, South
Korea, Japan and United Kingdom which account for an aggregate total of 38.64 percent of the world pigs. Other
countries account 4.07 percent having 32 million heads in the same year. The total number of pigs is estimated at
784 million heads in 2022 (Table 3.9.1).

Table 3.9.1: Number of Swine, Selected Countries, (in 1000 heads) 2019-2022

%of Share
2019 2020 2021 2022
Country (2022)
China 428,070 310,410 406,500 449,220 57.29
European Union 143,519 143,146 145,843 141,656 18.07
United States 75,070 76,833 7,312 74,446 9.49
Brazil 38,427 37,850 37,850 35,688 4.55
Canada 14,070 14,065 14,120 14,075 1.80
Mexico 10,700 11,050 11,500 11,775 1.50
Korea, South 11,333 11,280 11,078 11,217 1.43
Japan 9,156 9,090 9,290 8,949 1.14
United Kingdom 4,648 4,741 4,828 5,150 0.66
Others 29,750 30,890 31,730 31,918 4.07
TOTAL 764,743 649,355 680,051 784,094 100

111-swine -314
Pigs are one of the most commonly raised animals in the world. They are primary source of protein for billions of
people across different cultures and geographical regions. In 2024, there were over 784 million pigs worldwide,
increasing from around 764 million heads in 2019. An increase of about 2.5 percent was observed in table above
from 2019 to 2022.

National
The various breeds of pigs or swine in the Philippines used by livestock farmers vary. Many micro-scale farmers grow
native breed pigs and most medium to large scale production grow and sell imported breed varieties.

Despite being dynamic and technologically advanced, the local pig industry is still confronted with inefficiency of
production due to low sow productivity, high mortality due to inefficient diagnostic tool, and lack of native pig genetic
resource conservation, improvement and utilization initiative. Hence, LGUs are enjoined to support the initiative of the
national government in creating new opportunities and increase overall competitiveness of the Philippine swine
industry.

Pork is the main livestock product being consumed in the country. In 2022 according to Philippine Statistics Authority,
there was a reduction in the number of heads of pigs due to the African Swine Fever (ASF) that recently strict the
country. From 12 million swine in 2017 it will become 9 million in 2022 or simply a reduction of 3 million swine. During
this period backyard swine accounts for 69.82 percent or 6,810,831 swine and commercially grown swine reached to
30.18 percent (Table 3.9.2).

Table 3.9.2: Inventory of Swine in the Philippines, 2017-2022

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Philippines 12,604,441 12,709,248 12,795,721 9,943,119 9,426,092 9,753,697
Backyard 8,092,940 8,167,864 7,971,400 7,205,749 6,730,794 6,810,831
Commercial 4,511,501 4,541,384 4,824,321 2,737,370 2,695,298 2,942,866
Source: PSA, Open Stat, Livestock, 2022

Regional

In Mindanao, various product formats of hogs are being produced and traded across the different regions. These
include the animals for breeding and reared for meat. The live hogs used for swine production by both backyard and
commercial farmers are traded all over the island. Boars and sows are mostly locally bred which are brought to
commercial farms in the locality. Gilts and piglets are directly distributed and multiplied in both commercial and
backyard farms throughout the island. Culls are sold locally in surrounding barangays for household consumption
and meat processing.

Quality breeders (boards and gilt), which are used for breeding purposes only are purchased by commercial farmers
from other areas of the country.

111-swine -315
Northern Mindanao has produced 960,716 swine in 2022 with 571,467 or 59.48 percent raised backyard while
389,249 or 40.52 percent were grown commercially. Both of this type of growing for swine suffered a fluctuating trend
of raising hogs imposed by the national government due to swine’s diseases (Table 3.9.3).

Table 3.9.3 Swine Inventory of Northern Mindanao 2017-2022

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Region X (Northern 999,706 1,021,102 1,062,320 990,765 950,182 960,716
Mindanao)
Backyard 574,491 589,924 604,132 559,699 537,394 571,467
Commercial 425,215 431,178 458,188 431,066 412,788 389,249

Misamis Oriental

Swine industry in Misamis Oriental, like most of the meat production industry of the country, is based on intensive
production with trends suggesting future increases in intensification. Pork is the main source of protein in the
province. This industry depends on cheap grain, cheap energy, and intensive care and management on disease
control.

Just like in Region X, various product formats of hogs are being produced and traded across different local buyers
and sellers. Swine industry in province raised for meat and for breeding both for backyard and commercial farmers
to have a better financial return of their investment.

Misamis Oriental is the second swine producer in the Region shared 17.8%. Table 3.9.4 recorded the swine
inventory of the province from 2017 to 2022 both backyard and commercial raisers. Animal inventory from 2017 to
2020 was increasing and continuously decreasing from 2021 to 2022.

Table 3.9.4 Swine Inventory of Misamis Oriental 2017-2022

2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Misamis
177,947 181,756 189,092 208,374 198,948 171,007
Oriental
Backyard 158,372 161,762 168,291 179,485 175,885 152,196
Commercial 19,575 19,994 20,801 28,889 23,063 18,811
Source: PSA, Open Stat, Livestock, 2022

Global Production

In 2022 China dominated almost 50 percent of the world share on swine production and consumption. This is
followed by European Union and United States having 19% and 10%, respectively. The rest of the world varies in
carcass weight production below the 10 percent marks. Philippines, on the other hand have meager hog production
in carcass weight with less than one percent during the year. The world has produced 114 metric tons more than 14
million metric tons produced four (4) years ago (2019).

111-swine -316
Table 3.9.5: Hog Production, Carcass Weight Equivalent (in 1000 MT) 2019-2022

Country 2019 2020 2021 2022 % of Share (2022)

China 42,550 36,340 47,500 55,000 48.34
European Union 22,996 23,219 23,615 22,670 19.93
United States 12,543 12,845 12,560 12,252 10.77
Brazil 3,975 4,125 4,365 4,350 3.82
Canada 2,000 2,115 2,101 2,085 1.83
Mexico 1,408 1,451 1,484 1,530 1.34
Korea, South 1,364 1,403 1,407 1,415 1.24
Japan 1,279 1,306 1,318 1,295 1.14
United Kingdom 960 980 1,035 945 0.83
Philippines 1,585 1,115 1,000 925 0.81
Hong Kong 74 63 74 84 0.07
Others 10,296 10,797 11,148 11,224 9.87
TOTAL 101,030 95,759 107,607 113,775 100

Meat consumption was dominated by the China with more than half the carcass weight equivalent of 112 million
metric tons in 2022. European Union and the United States have at least 17 percent and 9 percent, respectively. The
rest of the world has consumption of less than eight percent during the year. The Philippines during the year have
consumption of more than one percent which means that we have to order some pork in the adjacent countries. The
world consumed about 113 million metric tons more than 13 million metric tons consumed 4 years ago (2019).

Table 3.9.6: Total Consumption, Carcass Weight Equivalent (in 1000 MT) 2019-2022

Country 2019 2020 2021 2022 % of Share

(2022)
China 44,865 41,517 51,724 56,948 50.60
European Union 18,894 18,204 18,723 18,640 16.56
United States 10,066 10,034 9,918 9,964 8.85
Brazil 3,116 2,949 3,047 3,033 2.70
Japan 2,714 2,732 2,760 2,782 2.47
Mexico 2,159 2,052 2,320 2,505 2.23
Korea, South 2,011 1,976 1,997 2,082 1.85
Philippines 1,806 1,282 1,460 1,509 1.34
United Kingdom 1,502 1,426 1,506 1,475 1.31
Canada 945 857 859 894 0.79
Hong Kong 405 441 438 349 0.31
Others 11,343 11,557 12,230 12,357 10.98
TOTAL 99,826 95,027 106,982 112,538 100.00

Pork, the meat of hogs or swine, is widely consumed in the world than poultry and beef. People eat many different
pork products, such as bacon, sausage and pork chops. A 250-pound market hog yield about 150 pounds of pork. In

111-swine -317
addition to pork, several valuable products come from swine. These include insulin for the regulation of diabetes,
valves for human heart surgery, suede for shoes and clothing, and gelatin for foods and non-food uses. Swine by-
products are also important parts of products such as water filters, insulation, rubber, antifreeze, certain plastics, floor
waxes, crayons, chalk, adhesives and fertilizer. Lard is fat from pig abdomens and is used in shaving creams, soaps,
make-up, baked goods and other foods.

National Production

Swine is also one of the most significant agri-based industries in the Philippines. Swine production in the Philippines
is the revenue generator among agricultural products. Total swine production as of 2022 was estimated at 1,737,120
metric tons which was much lower than the 2018 by almost one million. About 70 percent of the country’s swine
came from small holds farms, followed by commercial farm with 30 percent.

The highest contributors of hog in the country were reported in Central Visayas, Northern Mindanao and Western
Visayas with 13.19 percent, 12.66 percent, and 11.80 percent, respectively. The raisers from CALABARZON have
contributed about a little lower than the Western Visayas with 11.70 percent. The rest of the areas in the country
have contribution below 7 percent.

Table 3.9.7 Volume of Hog Production, by Region, 2018 -2022

Region 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Philippines 2,319,764 2,296,651 2,142,647 1,696,150 1,737,120
National Capital Region 240 172
Cordillera Administrative Region 26,655 26,647 25,782 21,889 20,449
(CAR)
Region I (Ilocos Region) 94,684 94,568 92,223 57,660 53,062
Region II (Cagayan Valley) 71,805 72,488 68,922 39,671 32,052
Region III (Central Luzon) 472,552 417,748 322,410 104,782 131,901
Region IV-A (CALABARZON) 381,590 395,545 348,511 187,902 203,241
MIMAROPA Region 80,840 79,381 79,794 91,711 92,183
Region V (Bicol Region) 130,063 133,246 119,881 99,213 100,502
Region VI (Western Visayas) 187,105 191,899 195,298 200,283 205,040
Region VII (Central Visayas) 194,472 192,758 192,871 208,755 229,142
Region VIII (Eastern Visayas) 77,972 77,522 81,955 78,142 51,070
Region IX (Zamboanga Peninsula) 82,084 82,135 82,950 85,147 96,400
Region X (Northern Mindanao) 196,623 200,965 210,032 217,466 219,917
Region XI (Davao Region) 154,784 155,894 150,190 136,298 138,640
Region XII (SOCCSKSARGEN) 117,291 124,594 122,809 124,689 127,159
Region XIII (Caraga) 40,689 40,495 38,492 31,286 24,679
Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in 10,555 10,767 10,527 11,016 11,511
Muslim Mindanao (BARMM)
Source: PSA, OpenStat, Livestock, 2022

111-swine -318
Swine production plays a major role in ensuring the country’s food security by meat consumption of Filipinos. Data
showed that swine in the Philippine have put the country limelight of the world in in terms of the volume of pork
production. However, majority or about two-thirds of the pigs in the Philippines are kept by small hold pig raisers.
These swine farmers are confronted with low productivity and swine mismanagement practices resulting to low sow
production and high mortality rates.

In the Philippines around 65% of swine production is done by backyard farmers, which shows a growing number of
Filipinos venturing into this field. However, backyard swine farmers are confronted with low productivity and swine
mismanagement practices resulting to low sow production and high mortality rates.

Global warming is one of the external factors that contribute to low productivity and profitability which heighten the
unpredictable weather that resulted into increase in infection and respiratory diseases for farm animals.

There are many studies on technologies and systems have been developed which can improve productivity and
production efficiency of the swine industry. Through these initiatives, the program seeks to create a new opportunity
and increase the overall competitiveness of the Philippine swine industry.

As the country’s experiencing and increase of production of swine throughout the regions, there is also a slow rise of
the produce from commercial farms. For the time being, backyard farming produce has also gradually declined which
shows that there is an increased pig production and program of commercial farms in various areas of the country
which provides a more accessible supply of pork in the market centers.

Regional Production

The inventory of the number of heads of swine in the Region is 12.66 percent of the total number of swine production
in the country. In terms of production of swine, the region has 219,917 metric tons in 2022.

Northern Mindanao ranks second in terms of swine production in the country with Central Visayas garnering first and
Western Visayas third. This is followed by CALABARZON, Davao Region, Central Luzon and SOCSSKSARGEN.
Understandably, ARMM being a predominant Muslim has the smallest population of hogs.

In Mindanao, various pork product formats are being produced and traded across the regions of country. Upon
slaughter house processing, ideally, pork carcass is either distributed as whole body or chopped meat in specific
retail outlets, lechon houses or other business markets. Most of these choice cuts are sold in both public markets and
meat shops in regions and supermarkets in urban cities or municipalities. Other product formats are directly sold to
meat processors.

Misamis Oriental Production

In Misamis Oriental, swine is mostly farmed for its meat. Food products made from pigs include pork sausages which
include casing from its intestines, bacons, hams, pork rinds and others. Livestock pigs are also exhibited at the
agricultural shows judged either as stock compare to the standard features of each pig breed or in commercial
classes where animals are judged primarily on their suitability for slaughter to provide premium meat.

111-swine -319
Unlike, the Philippines and Regional number of heads for swine, Misamis Orintal posted a higher total in backyard
grown swine of 89% compared to commercial. Hence, swine production in the province is dominated by the backyard
growers. In 2022 the number of swine produced in the province is 17.8% of the Region’s and 2% as compared to
the country total.

Since Misamis Oriental is the second producers of swine in the Region. The top five (5) swine producer of the
province are Magsaysay, Opol, Claveria, Salay and Gingoog City. The lowest producer is Balingoan.

Table 3.9.8 Volume of Hog Production in Misamis Oriental Per Municipalities/ Cities CY2022

Municipalities / Population Poverty No. Swine Volume of No. of Raisers

Cities Incidence Raised Production (MT)
Magsaysay 36,803 25.8 15,933 637.32 3,187
Gingoog City 136,698 22.7 13,785 551.4 2,757
Medina 35,612 18.2 2,750 110.00 550
Talisayan 25,761 19.9 1,450 58.00 290
Balingoan 11,020 18.5 1,106 44.24 221
Kinoguitan 14,091 17.1 3,550 142.00 710
Sugbongcogon 9,764 17.9 1,300 52.00 260
Binuangan 7,441 17.1 1,550 62.00 310
Salay 29,998 17.3 14,250 570.00 2,850
Lagonglong 24,190 18.9 1,450 58.00 290
Balingasag 74,385 20.1 9,645 385.80 1,929
Jasaan 57,055 16.7 8,488 339.52 1,698
Villanueva 40,419 16.0 2,205 88.20 441
Claveria 52,478 22.1 14,900 596.00 2,980
Tagoloan 80,319 16.8 8,493 339.72 1,699
Opol 66,327 12.7 15,751 630.04 3,150
El Salvador 58,771 13.3 9,950 398.00 1,990
Alubijid 32,163 14.9 8,106 324.24 1,621
Laguindingan 26,363 15.2 2,164 86.56 433
Gitagum 17,920 15.8 1,645 65.80 329
Libertad 12,948 17.9 2,115 84.60 423
Initao 33,902 17.0 7,700 308.00 1,540
Naawan 22,444 16.7 5,190 207.60 1,038
Manticao 29,469 17.7 10,526 421.04 2,105
Lugait 20,559 14.1 7,005 280.20 1,401
Misamis Oriental 957,900 21.4 171,007 6,840.28 34,201

111-swine -320
Figure 3.9.1 Commodity Map for Hog Production in Misamis Oriental

3.9.2 Swine Industry Strategic Development Directions and Investment Plan

Investment Plan

The swine industry of the province is continuously upgrading and influenced the private sector. All value chain its
players are dominated by the private firms, both large-based firms and MSME-based enterprises. However, the
chunk player involved in the production of live hogs is attributed to backyard farmer who are the major focus for the
development of the industry. As the PRDP of the DA adopts the value chain approach in developing the swine
industry in Mindanao, the program will invest on substantial and initiatives in necessary part of the chain that will
pave sustainable impact to the whole chain, from input provision to distribution.

111-swine -321
Major constraints that limit the industry’s growth and development include:

 High cost and limited supplies of needed agricultural inputs

 Lack of financial, technical and business capacities of backyard farmers
 Lack of focus of government to livestock sector in terms of regulation and marketing.
 Lack of appropriate facilities to produced quality pork products

With these influencing factors, a sustainable farm village approach should be laid down and utilized to support the
weak links within the chain: the backyard farmers. This approach presents the various players that will synergize to
formulate comprehensive and packaged initiative to help improve backyard farmers and other related MSMEs. This
approach involves integrated vertical and horizontal relationships that will provide opportunities for capacity building
and productivity.

Priority recommendation for Swine Industry includes:

 Develop and enhance soya and yellow corn industries as support to the swine industry
 Capacity building for backyard farmers
 Promote Mindanao as an investment area for swine industry
 Organize and strengthen backyard farmer’s associations
 Public-Private Partnership initiatives on slaughterhouse management and establishment
 Intensify macro-level market penetration assistance for exports market and available markets within the
country
 Intensify government on all regulatory initiatives: GAHP certification, importation/dumping, meat
inspections, slaughtering, slaughter house management and local zone policies

The value chain of swine in Misamis Oriental plays a significant role in so far as providing opportunities for the
commercial growers, backyard farmers, traders and pork consumers. Misamis Oriental contribution to the industry
has provided backyard and commercial growers a source of income. The development and enhance soya and yellow
corn industries will give opportunities to both agricultural and backyard farmers. The investment for swine industry
will surely improve the living conditions of the populace of the province.

Swine Industry Strategic Development Directions

The direction that the stakeholders see for the swine industry is to go upward and is to expand its market horizon
outside the province and developing all concerned players and addressing technical and marketing concerns of the
operations. As the trend of the industry leads to the supply pork products in Visayas and Luzon and providing the
growing demand of pork in said areas, developing the industry in all aspects of value chain is essential.

The following strategic directions have been laid down for the swine industry:

 Create and expand opportunities in related farm inputs production and trade by establishing/improving
related industries such as the soy meal, yellow corn and swine breeder production.
 Increase the level of production of swine by developing the backyard farm players efficiently and upgrading
commercial farms for GAHP certification.

111-swine -322
  Sustain a province’s FMD and ASF-free status and effectively minimizing incidents of swine-related
diseases by all players through intensive monitoring of farm operation and transferring of livestock and meat
products within and outside the province.
 Improve quality of pork meat by putting up or upgrading of slaughter houses to double A or triple A
categories and monitoring of compliance of meat establishments to mandatory requirements including food
safety.
 Establish and penetrate into new market opportunities in the inter country through multi-sectoral
collaboration and intensive industry promotion.
 Develop a proactive and needs-based support community that strives to establish an inclusive and clear
industry growth and direction that will benefit all stakeholders.
 Establishment of Quarantine Station in all entry points of the province from other provinces and intensify
strict implementation of the facility.
 Establishment of Swine Multiplier Farm in every municipality/cities with quality breed and source of breeder
stock in the respective areas to minimize spread of diseases.

3.9.3 Expanded Vulnerability and Sustainability Assessment (EVSA): Swine

The elements / parameters being assessed in the EVSA analysis tools. Among those being look into are
the population of the locality 20%, the number of heads raised 25%, the number of support facilities 10%,
number of raisers or farmers 20% and the poverty incidence 25%. However, other factors considered
assessment on swine production relies on the ability of each LGU to implement projects within the value
chain of the swine industry. An area with a new composite index of 0.4000 is suitable for swine production.

3.9.9 The Result of the EVSA Computation for Swine Production in Misamis Oriental

Parameters
Ranking
No. of Total
City/Municipality Poverty No. of No. of Base on
Population support Index
Incidence Heads Raisers Index
Facilities
20% 25% 25% 10% 20%
Gingoog City 27,340 6 3,446 0 551 31,343 1
Tagoloan 16,064 4 2,123 0 340 18,531 2
Opol 13,265 3 3,938 0 630 17,836 3
Balingasag 14,877 5 2,411 0 386 17,679 4
Claveria 10,496 6 3,725 0 596 14,822 5
El Salvador City 11,754 3 2,488 0 398 14,643 6
Jasaan 11,411 4 2,122 0 340 13,877 7
Magsaysay 7,361 6 3,983 0 637 11,988 8
Salay 6,000 4 3,563 0 570 10,137 9

111-swine -323
 Parameters
No. of Ranking
City/Municipality Poverty No. of No. of
Population support Total Base on
Incidence Heads Raisers
Facilities Index Index
20% 25% 25% 10% 20%
Initao 6,780 4 1,925 0 308 9,018 10
Manticao 5,894 4 2,632 0 421 8,951 11
Alubijid 6,433 4 2,027 0 324 8,787 12
Villanueva 8,084 4 551 0 88 8,727 13
Medina 7,122 5 688 0 110 7,925 14
Lugait 4,112 4 1,751 0 280 6,147 15
Naawan 4,489 4 1,298 0 208 5,998 16
Languindingan 5,273 4 541 0 87 5,904 17
Talisayan 5,152 5 363 0 58 5,578 18
Lagonglong 4,838 5 363 0 58 5,263 19
Gitagum 3,584 4 411 0 66 4,065 20
Kinoguitan 2,818 4 888 0 142 3,852 21
Libertad 2,590 4 529 0 85 3,208 22
Balingoan 2,204 5 277 0 44 2,529 23
Sugbongcogon 1,953 4 325 0 52 2,334 24
Binuangan 1,488 4 388 0 62 1,942 25

111-swine -324
Figure 3.9.2 EVSA Map of Swine in Misamis Oriental

111-swine -325
 3.9.4: PCIP Gap Matrix Swine Product Value Chain in Misamis Oriental

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in Intervention SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
the VC Dev’t. MFO Other Players
in the Province
Input Provision
Limited supply Develop an Enough supply of Gingoog Gingoog Gingoog Gingoog Drought or Adopt a DA/PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/PLGU/
of feed mix integrated soya Soya thru City/ City/ City/ City/ Dry Spell, resistant MLGU/ MLGU/
ingredients industry that will Development of Magsaysay Magsaysay Magsaysay Magsaysay/ Flood, crops/ variety Farmers Farmers
[soya meal, Soya production by / Claveria/ / Claveria/ / Claveria/ Claveria/ Tropical to changing
support the
yellow corn] at least 500 Balingasag/ Balingasag/ Balingasag/ Balingasag/ Storm, pest climate; IPM
swine hectares /year Salay/ Salay/ Salay/ Salay/ and practices;
Jasaan/ Jasaan/ Jasaan/ Jasaan/ disease. contouring.
Medina/ Medina/ Medina/ Medina/
Talisayan/ Talisayan/ Talisayan/ Talisayan/
Kinoguitan/ Kinoguitan/ Kinoguitan/ Kinoguitan/
Sugbongco Sugbongco Sugbongco Sugbongcog
gon/ gon/ gon/ on/
Tagoloan Tagoloan Tagoloan Tagoloan
Promote Increase area of at Province Province Province Province DA/PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/PLGU/
Increase area least 500 Wide Wide Wide Wide MLGU/ MLGU/
production of hectares / year Farmers Farmers
yellow corn
Provision of 5 units distributed Magsaysay Medina/ Manticao/ Balingasag/ DA/PLGU/ 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 DA/PLGU/
Hammer Mills / Gingoog Talisayan/ Naawan/ Villanueva/ MLGU/ MLGU/
for feed mixing City/ Salay/ Claveria/ Initao/ Gitagum/ Farmers Farmers
and Provision of El Opol/ Jasaan/ Lugait/
Palletizing Salvador/ Alubijid Tagoloan Alubijid
machine Laguinding
an
Establishment of 2 Units Established Claveria Gingoog DA-PRDP/ 20,000 20,000 DA-PRDP/
Feed Mill City PhiMech/ PhiMech/
Facilities PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/ MLGU
/ FA / FA

VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
111-swine -326
Constraints in the Intervention Outcomes SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO Other Players
Province
Input Provision
Alternative Promotion in the Province Province Province Province DA/PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/PLGU/
Feed development of Wide Wide Wide Wide MLGU/ MLGU/
ingredients alternative feeds Farmers Farmers
at least each
growers will
plant at least
half hectare
Promote the Production Cost Province Province Province Province DA/PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/PLGU/
use of reduced at least Wide Wide Wide Wide MLGU/ MLGU/
alternative 5% by provision Farmers Farmers
protein mix of alternative
available in the protein mix thru
market ex: voucher
copra meal
Establish a Agrivet Store Magsaysay Medina/ Jasaan/ Opol/ El DA/PLGU/ 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 DA/PLGU/
COOP / PO owned by a / Gingoog Claveria/ Naawan / Salvador/ MLGU/ MLGU/
Agrivet store cooperative/ PO City/ Balingasag Libertad Alubijid Farmers Farmers
of backyard Salay /
swine Laguinding
an
Lack of technical Conduct IEC and Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ ATI/
knowhow in feed intensive 1 training/ year PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/ MLGU
formulation and training on feed / PO / PO
mixing by mixing/ Feed
backyard farmers Formulation to
backyard
farmers
growers
Advocate local- Conduct IEC Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ ATI/
based or advocating use PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/ MLGU
indigenous of indigenous / PO / PO
ingredients ingredients to
feed mixing backyard

111-swine -327
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in the Intervention Outcomes SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO Other Players
Province
Strengthen 6 Training Claveria/ Gingoog Opol/ DA/ ATI/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ ATI/
provincial/ Center/ Learning Magsaysay City/ Naawan PLGU/ PLGU/
municipal Site strengthen/ Balingasag MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
farmers Established
Training
Center/
Learning Site
Monitoring and Insure feed Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ PLGU/ 5 5 5 5 DA/ PLGU/
control of ingredients MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
supply and sufficiency and
price of feed stable price
ingredients control
Limited superior Push Acquire 20 Claveria DA/ PLGU/ 200 DA/ PLGU/
genetic stock investment on heads of /Gingoog MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
Quality breeder to City
Breeder stock produce semen
for AI
Sustain the PLGU Mis. PLGU Mis. PLGU Mis. PLGU Mis. DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
operation of LN2 Or. Or. Or. Or. MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
Project
Establishment of Gingoog Laguinding Naawan DA/ PLGU/ 2,000 2,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
Breeder Farm/ City/ Salay an/ MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
Growth Areas Claveria
Provision of 100/ GBDA & CLAJAVET MANLUNA Mis. Or. DA/ PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ PLGU/
year piglets to MISORET A/ Area MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
famers for Areas GALILIEO
backyard Areas
Provision of AI GBDA & CLAJAVET MANLUNA DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
Equipment MISORET A/ Area MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
Areas GALILIEO
Areas

111-swine -328
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in Intervention SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
the VC Dev’t. in MFO Other Players
the Province
All LGUs must All LGUs PLGU/MLGU/
pass an ordinance
regarding the
implementation of
swine
establishment
Intensive Conduct quality CLAJAVET MISORET/ PLGU/MLGU/ 500 500 PLGU/MLGU/
breeder / breeder A/ GBDA PO PO
Artificial insemination (AI) GALILIEO/
Insemination program to MANLUNA
(AI) program interested
backyard farmers
Train barangay
Artificial
Insemination
technicians to
improve genetics
of swine in the
backyard raisers
Intensify Increase number CLAJAVET MISORET/ DA/ 1,000 1,000 DA/
implementatio of swine A/ GBDA PLGU/MLGU/ PLGU/MLGU/
n of multiplier producer’s GALILIEO/ PO PO
farms association MANLUNA
investing in a
breeder farms
Low quality of Advocate Conduct of an Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/PLGU/ DA/PLGU/
swine housing locally-based information MLGU/ ATI/ MLGU/ ATI/
facilities used by or indigenous education PO PO
backyard materials for campaign to
farmers housing backyard farmers
facilities on the proper
housing facilities
for Swine Raisers

111-swine -329
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in Intervention SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
the VC Dev’t. in MFO Other Players
the Province
Lack of proper Operate Animal disease Province Province Province Province DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
disease provincial profiling Wide Wide Wide Wide MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
diagnosis animal
disease
diagnosis by
provision of
basic lab
equipment/su
pplies
(microscope)
Intensify the Strengthen Tagoloan Opol DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
operation of control of trans MLGU MLGU
Quarantine in boundary animal
all entry point thru Establishment
of Mis. Or. of Quarantine
Sustainability PCIC Insurance thru Province Province Province Province DA/ PLGU/ 100 100 100 100 DA/ PLGU/
/ Security of registration of Wide Wide Wide Wide MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
swine project farmers in RSBSA
PRODUCTION/CONSOLIDATION
Backyard swine Organize and 1 Swine PO /LGU Province DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
growers are not federate organized & Wide MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
organized barangay Swine Strengthen Swine
Raisers Raisers
Federation
1 Swine Farmers Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ PLGU/ 2500 2,500 2,500 2,500 DA/ PLGU/
Congress/ year MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
Lack of Conduct trainings 1 Training / year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ATI/
competencies on care and mgt. PLGU/ PLGU/
Trained Municipal Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. 500 500 500 500
on care and on hog production MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
to backyard Biosecurity
management on Officers
farmers and
hog by farmers Enforce DA AO 7
on biosecurity series of 2021 –
and waste Guidelines for the
management Bantay ASF sa
Brgy

111-swine -330
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in Intervention SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
the VC Dev’t. in MFO Other Players
the Province
Abuse on the Educate Conduct Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ATI/
use of antibiotics farmers on IEC/Training on PLGU/ PLGU/
Anti-microbial (AMR) MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
resistance
(AMR)
Conduct 1 Training Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ATI/
trainings on conducted / year PLGU/ PLGU/
Organic MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
production 1 Training on GAHP Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ATI/
practices and conducted / year PLGU/ PLGU/
GAHP among MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
backyard
farmers
Season long /in- Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ATI/ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA/ATI/
house training of PLGU/ PLGU/
farmers with partner MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
pig farm 10
farmers / LGU/ Year
Conduct of 1 Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ATI/ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA/ATI/
trainings/ year for PLGU/ PLGU/
swine production MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
and/or processing
with provision of
starter kits

111-swine -331
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in Intervention SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
the VC Dev’t. in MFO Other Players
the Province
Lack of Capital Assist on Forge partnership CLAJAVET GBDA/ DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
by backyard Finance among different A/ MISORET MLGU/ FI MLGU/ FI
farmers access with financing institution MANLUNA/
Lower in relation to swine GALILIEO
requirements production of the
with other province
micro-
financial
institutions
specifically on
input
provision,
feeds,
equipment or
infrastructure
support
Develop and Provision of the loan All Areas All Areas All Areas All Areas DA/ PLGU/ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 DA/ PLGU/
strengthen scheme through MLGU/ FI MLGU/ FI
promotion of livelihood programs
customized from the local
government government units
special loan
for livestock
Lack of Identification Conduct technology All Areas All Areas All Areas All Areas DA/ PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ PLGU/
entrepreneurial and proper skills programs on MLGU/ ATI MLGU/ ATI
and basic assessment the identified
financial of bankable backyard farmers
management farmer
associations
that will be
given skills
technology
programs for
sustainability

111-swine -332
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in Intervention Outcomes SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
the VC Dev’t. in MFO Other Players
the Province
Improvement of Conduct All Areas All Areas All Areas All Areas DA/ PLGU/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ PLGU/
the trainings on MLGU/ ATI MLGU/ ATI
entrepreneurial entrepreneurial
and financial and
management basic financial
skills of the management
backyard and skills
swine producers
Urbanization: Conduct 2 community 1st District 2nd District DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
There is a extensive consultations MLGU/ MLGU/
growing concern community with swine
of possible consultations farmers on
misplacement of specifically with policy concerns
farms due to the swine farmers and
land use plans, on policy recommendation
tourism concerns and
development recommendations
and increase of Implement and 25 LGUs 1st District 2nd District DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
population enforce land use implemented MLGU/ MLGU/
resulting to land zoning effectively land use and
conversions and zoning
swine farms are effectively
currently
established
Slow Strengthen Strict All Areas All Areas All Areas All Areas DA/ PLGU/ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 DA/ PLGU/
implementation provincial and implementation MLGU MLGU
of municipal of Swine
Dispersal dispersal program Dispersal
Programs of mechanism Livelihood
LGUs Strict monitoring Project
of dispersal
program

111-swine -333
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in the Intervention Outcomes SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO Other Players
Province
Minimal number Conduct training 1 training / year Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ ATI/
of commercial on organic PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/ MLGU
farmers with production / PO / PO
Good Animal practices and
Husbandry GAHP among
Practices backyard
(GAHP) farmers
certification
Poor quality of Provide better Provision of All areas All Areas All Areas All Areas DA/ ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ ATI/
pork meat for genetics for quality stock by PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/ MLGU
large meat backyard AI Intensification / PO / PO
processors farmers
Encourage use Provision of All areas All Areas All Areas All Areas DA/ ATI/ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 DA/ ATI/
of superior quality feeds PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/ MLGU
quality breed thru voucher / PO / PO
Strengthen drive
on superior
quality breed
Sharing of 1 Matching / Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ ATI/ 500 500 500 500 DA/ ATI/
product year PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/ MLGU
specifications / PO / PO
through supplier
matching of
meat processors
and farmer
associations
Develop 1 Marketing Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. Mis. Or. DA/ ATI/ 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 DA/ ATI/
marketing Contract forge / PLGU/ MLGU PLGU/ MLGU
contracts with year / PO / PO
current local
meat processors
in Mindanao and
other areas in
the country

111-swine -334
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in the Intervention Outcomes SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO Other Players
Province
Establishment of 1 Multiplier Farm Laguindingan/ Gingoog Naawan DA/ PLGU/ 10,000 5,000 5,000 DA/ PLGU/
swine multiplier established / Salay MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
farm Cluater
Develop nucleus Developed 1 Claveria DA/ PLGU 15,000 DA/ PLGU
farm within the Nucleus Farm
local
government unit
in the province
Processing
Rampant “Hot Construction of Construction of Laguindingan Initao/ DA-PRDP/ 180,000 90,000 DA-PRDP/
Meat” sold to slaughterhouse Double “A” / Salay Tagoloan PLGU/ PLGU/
consumers with cold Slaughter House MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
storage and cold with Cold
facility and Storage Facility
Marketing plus Ref Van
Facilities Upgrading of Gingoog Naawan DA-PRDP/ 50,000 50,000 DA-PRDP/
Slaughter House City/ PLGU/ PLGU/
with Cold Tagoloan MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
Storage & Ref
Van
Establishment of Bio Security All Growers All All Growers All Growers DA/ PLGU/ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 DA/ PLGU/
Bio-Secure installed Backyard Growers Backyard Backyard MLGU /PO MLGU /PO
Facility on farmers & Backyard farmers & farmers &
Integrated Commercial farmers Commercia Commercial
National Swine Growers & l Growers Growers
Production Commer
Initiatives for cial
Recovery and Growers
Expansion
Insufficient Construction of Provision of Claveria Alubijid/ Tagoloa DA-PRDP/ 320,000 400,000 DA-PRDP/
potable water Potable water Potable water in El PLGU/ PLGU/
the production Salvador MLGU/ PO MLGU/ PO
area City

111-swine -335
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ MFO/ Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in the Intervention Outcomes SUB/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
VC Dev’t. in the MFO Other Players
Province
Unregulated Intensify 25 LGUs meat All LGUs All LGUs All LGUs All LGUs DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
slaughtering of implementation inspection code MLGU/ MLGU/
hogs for Lechon and regulation of implemented
houses, meat Meat inspection and regulated
shops, malls, etc. code of the and IEC
Philippines or
“Oplan Bantay
Karne
Empower LGUs 25 LGUs have All LGUs All LGUs All LGUs All LGUs DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
on local-based organized local MLGU/ MLGU/
inspection meat inspection
through creation team
of local meat
inspection
Intensify IEC to LGUs prepared All LGUs All LGUs All LGUs All LGUs DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
consumers on slogans and MLGU/ MLGU/
slaughterhouse signages to be
policies placed within the
markets and
other
conspicuous
places
Intensify LGUs to All LGUs All LGUs All LGUs All LGUs DA/ PLGU/ 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 DA/ PLGU/
regulation and intensify MLGU/ MLGU/
monitoring of regulations and
malls on monitoring
outsourcing of
pork inventory
from regulated/
accredited of
abattoir

111-swine -336
VCA/Key Gap/ Potential Target/ Outcomes MF Target Area Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Constraints in the Intervention O/ 2023 2024 2025 2026 Management Lead and 2023 2024 2025 2026 Funds
VC Dev’t. in the SU Other Players
Province B/
MF
O
Marketing /Distribution
Existence of Review Conduct review on Province Province Province Province Drought, no build in DTI-AMAS, 200 200 200 200 DTI-AMAS,
import “dumping” minimum minimum access Wide Wide Wide Wide Flood, identified BOC, DTI, BOC, DTI,
cases - access volume volume policies on Tropical hazard areas DA- DA-
Unregulated policies Pork meat and Storm, Quarantine Quarantine
influx of pork products entering earthquake Services Services
carcass from the province
other Mindanao
Intensify regulationPrepare
of local Province Province Province Province DTI-AMAS, 200 200 200 200 DTI-AMAS,
meat importation policies on meat Wide Wide Wide Wide BOC, DTI, BOC, DTI,
importation coming DA- DA-
to the province Quarantine Quarantine
Services Services

Prioritize local IEC Conducted Province Province Province Province DTI-AMAS, 200 200 200 200 DTI-AMAS,
products thru every quarter Wide Wide Wide Wide BOC, DTI, BOC, DTI,
massive IEC DA- DA-
Quarantine Quarantine
Services Services
High Cost Poor Farm to Concreting/ DA-PRDP/ DA-PRDP/
/Logistic in Market Road Upgrading of PLGU/ PLGU/
marketing of meat along the FMRs: MLGU/ BLGU MLGU/ BLGU
products production areas Concreting of
to the processing Katipunan- 4.000 km. 108,000
Center Gumabon Road,
Magsaysay
Concreting of 4.000 km. 108,000
Talisay-
Mahayahay Road,
Gingoog City &
Magsaysay

111-swine -337
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Rehabilitation of 7.000 PCA, MLGUs, 189,000 PCA,
Bonifacio –Mindulao km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Road, Magsaysay PRDP PLGU, DA,
Construction of 2 km 54,000 PRDP
Mindulao-Tama Road,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Talisay- 4.000 km. 108,000
Mahayahay Road,
Gingoog City &
Magsaysay
Concreting of Tibon- 15 km 580,000
Tibon-Cabalawan –
Mindulao –Tama FMR
with brige, Magsaysay
Concreting of Kibungsod – 2 km 54,000
Cabantian Circuferencial
Road, Magsaysay
Construction of Artadi-San 5 km 150,000
Vicente FMR, Magsaysay
Construction of Kibungsod- 4 km 120,000
Cabubuhan –Villa Felipa
FMR, Magsaysay
Concreting of Consuelo- 7 km 189,000
Abunda-Tinaan FMR,
Magsaysay
Construction of Consuelo 6 km 162,000
(Kimaya) Pag-asa FMR,
Magsaysay
Concreting of Cabubuhan 2.5 km 67,500
(Lilo) Kibungsod FMR,
Magsaysay
Road Concreting at 11 km 297,000
Upper Malibud to
Dinawihan , Ginoog City
Concreting of Gingoog to 70.910 1,914,570
Claveria National Road, km.
Gingoog & Claveria

111-swine -338
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of Potential MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Kabug- 7.000 PCA, MLGUs, 189,000 PCA,
Sidlakan Road, Medina & km. PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Gingoog City PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Concreting of San Luis – 5.500 148,500
Kibuging Road, Gingoog km.
City
Bulwa – Mananum Bag-o 81,000
FMR, Medina 3 Km
Pahindong – Macopa FMR, 81,000
Medina 3 km
Bangbang Sidlakan FMR, 81,000
3 Km
Medina
Tupon- Maanas-San 81,000
Vicente-Maanyag FMR, 3 km
Medina
San Vicente – Kiiwang FMR, 2 Km 54,000
Medina
San Vicente – Sidlakan 2 Km 54,000
FMR, Medina
San Jose – Hollywood 108,000
4KM
FMR , Medina
South Poblacion FMR , 54,000
2 Km
Medina
Mananum Bag-o - Baluarte 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
Portulin – Dig-aguyan FMR, 81,000
3 Km
Medina
Gasa - Hangaron FMR, 81,000
3 KM
Medina

111-swine -339
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Manamum 6.5 km PCA, MLGUs, 174,000 PCA,
–Daan-Kabol-Kabol FMR PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
with Bridge - Medina PRDP PLGU, DA,
San Roque FMR, Medina 3 KM 81,000 PRDP
Mimbolo - Natugod FMR, 81,000
3 Km
Medina
Maanas – San Vicente 81,000
3 Km
FMR, Medina
San Isidro – Labas 81,000
3 Km
Pagsama FMR , Medina
Concreting of 10 km 240,000
Pangpangon-Putting
Balas-Sibantang-
Mahayahay FMR -
Talisayan
Concreting of Bugdang 2 km 54,000
FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Minlimaw- 5 km 135,000
Mahayag FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Casibole- 7 km 189,00
Mandahilag-Macopa FMR, 0
Talisayan
Concreting of Poblacion – 2 km 54,000
Sindangan FMR, Talisayan
Concreting of Pook- 7 km 189,00
Sibantang FMR, Talisayan 0
Concreting of San Jose – 6 km 162,00
Bugdang –Mahayag FMR, 0
Talisayan
Concreting of Mintabon – 5 km 135,000
Sibantang FMR,
Talisayan
Concreting of Maanas- 8.600 232,200
Kibuguing Road, Medina km.
& Gingoog City

111-swine -340
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of Potential MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Ran
Segments & in VC Development Intervention Sub & other Players Funds k
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO
Concreting of Mimbule to 1.80 km PCA, MLGUs, 48,000 PCA,
Saray FMR-Salay PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Concreting of Kalongonan 10 Km PRDP 200,000 PLGU, DA,
Kandal FMR, Salay PRDP
Concreting of Alipuaton- 4 km 120,,000
Bunal FMR- Salay
Concreting of Matampa 1.5 km 40,500
FMR-Salay
Concreting of Saray- 10 km 200,000
Mimbalite –Matampa FMR,
Salay
Construction of FMR with 4 0.75 km 54,000
Barrels Box Cluvert at Salay
River II, Salay
Concreting of Looc- 3.000 90,000
Tinagaan FMR, Salay km
Concreting of Mananum- 1.6 km 43,961
Claveria FMR with Bridge,
Balingasag
Concreting of Kibalua FMR, 4.3 km 116,500
Balingasag
Concreting of Sitio 4.6 125,500
Nabuangan-Sitio Lantad km
FMR, Balingasag
Upgrading of Domagooc to 4.000 108,000
SitioPatrocenio FMR, km.
Jasaan
Upgrading of Solana to Sitio 3.000 81,000
Looc FMR, Jasaan km.
Upgrading of SitioKatu-an, 5.000 135,000
Natubo – Kimamaon Kimaya km.
FMR, Jasaan
Upgrading of San Antonio to 6.000 162,000
Sitio Cogon FMR, Jasaan km.

111-swine -341
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Lead Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Ran
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub & other Players Funds k
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO
Concreting of San 16 PCA, MLGUs, 432,000 PCA,
Nicolas-Upper Antonio- km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
IS-Cruz Road, Jasaan PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Concreting of Sitio Bato, 4 km 320,000
Brgy kimaya- Villanueva
Upgrading of Dawayan-
Lokong-Crossing 3.74 101,12
Mambuaya FMR, 54 6
Villanueva
km
Construction of FMR with 0.61 km 85,000
slope Protection and
sheet piles (300 meters
long) in Sitio Macusi,
Brgy. Kimaya, Villanueva
Concreting of 4 km 320,000
Cebukawon FMR,
Tagoloan
Concreting of Nasalaban 2 km 54,000
–Subaya FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of 4 km 120,000
Natumolan-Maribojoc
FMR, Tagolan
Rehabilitation of Rosario 3 km 90,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Danao 5 km 150,000
FMR, Tagoloan
Concreting of Rosario – 2.2 176,000
Comocomo FMR, km
Tagoloan
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) 10km 300,000
Tugasnon-San Francisco
El Salvador
Concreting of 10 km 300,000
Kalongonan-Kandal
FMR, El Salvador

111-swine -342
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of Potential MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO Players
Upgrading of Calubo- 1.726 PCA, MLGUs, 46,602 PCA,
Poblacion FMR, kinoguitan km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Upgrading of Sumalag- 2.11 56,970
Calubo, Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Salicapan- 2.9 78,300
Suarez FMR-Kinoguitan km
Upgrading of Calabo-Kitotok 1.16 31,320
FMR, Kinoguitan km
Concreting and 3 km 100,000
Rehabilitation of FMR of
Kitamban – Valdeconcha –
Mosangot Road, Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1 km 30,000
Valdeconcha-Silad-
Ampianga FMR, Binuangan
Construction/ Rehab of 1km 30,000
Kitambis – Kidalayon-
Membuahan FMR,
Binuangan
Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000
(Kumakaykay-
Valdechoncha-Kitamban),
Binuangan
Concreting of FMR 1km 30,000
(Gantangun-Kitambis),
Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini – 1km 30,000
Tinagaan Road, Binuangan
Concreting of Mabini- 1km 30,000
Tinigaan Road, Binuangan

111-swine -343
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO Players
Lacapon-Tugasnon Sitio 5.62 PCA, MLGUs, 168,600 PCA,
Bato (Hot Spring) km PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Seriwagan Sungay Road, PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Alubijid
Sitio Bato (Hot Spring) – 10km 300,000
Tugasnon- San Fransisco
de Asis, El Salvador
Spring Road, Laguindingan 0.79 km 21,330
Upgrading of Madrid-Lapad 1.628 43,956
Road , Laguindingan km
Upgrading of Lapad – 80,595
2.985
Sikiton Road-Lourdes Brgy.
km
Road , Laguindingan
Upgrading of Lapad- 13,500
Aromahon-Nob Road, 0.5 km
Laguindingan
Salcedo Hills Drive Road , 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Sitio Eba Road , 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Tangke Road, 10,800
0.4 km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot Spring Road, 26,460
0.98 km
Laguindingan
Kibaghot Alongan Road, 35,100
1.3 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Pagangon Road, 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Clarin Road , 75,600
2.8 km
Laguindingan
Gasi Pitogo Road, 25,920
0.96 km
Laguindingan

111-swine -344
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO Players
Liberty Anosa-Liberty Elem. PCA, MLGUs, PCA,
3 km
Sch. Road, Laguindingan PLGU, DA, 81,000 MLGUs,
Sinai-Aput Road, PRDP 40,500 PLGU, DA,
1.5 km
Laguindinga PRDP
Sambulawan Bajuyo Road, 67,500
2.5 km
Laguindingan
JKT. National Highway to 54,000
Virgin as Fatima, 2 km
Laguindingan
Sambulawan Tambo Road, 39,744
1.472 km
Laguindingan
Sambulawan Tambo Road, 33,750
1.25 km
Laguindingan
Liberty Pitogo Road, 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Liberty Gasi Road , 81,000
3 km
Laguindingan
Liberty Campo Road, 3.15 85,050
Laguindingan km
Mauswagon Clarin Road, 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Mauswagon Rajal Road, 27,000
1 km
Laguindingan
Concreting of Aromahon 37,800
1.4 km
Lapad Road, Laguindingan
Concreting of Aromahon- 51,300
1.9 km
Tiano Road, Laguindingan
Gasi-Sinai Road, 16,200
0.6, km
Laguindingan
Gasi-Pipian-Pagangon 23,400
1.2, km
Road, Laguindingan
Sinai-Gasi Road with 40,500
1.5 km
Bridge, Laguindingan

111-swine -345
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Pavement PCA, MLGUs, 8,700 PCA,
Road (Prk 4) to Existing 700 PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Concrete Pavement (Prk meter PRDP PLGU,
6), Pob. Gitagum DA,
Construction / Concreting 7,600 PRDP
800
of FMR P3A Talao-to C.P.
meter
Gracia, Gitagum
Upgrading of Puga-an – 48,600
1.8 km
Bitaugon FMR , Libertad
Concreting of Upper 135,000
Talacogon-Aya-aya Road, 5 km
Lugait
Concreting of Calangahan 135,000
–Upper Talacogon Road, 5 km
Lugait
Concreting of Aya-aya to 81,000
3 km
Sitio Tamao Road, Lugait
Upgrading of Gimampang-
Aluna-Casilihon FMR- 3.02 km 81,540
Initao
Upgrading/Concreting of
6 km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR, Initao
Upgrading of Sapong- 5.51
km 148,770
Mamiguis-Bansilang FMR-
Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 6 Km 162,000
Cogon-Lulang FMR, Initao
Upgrading/ Concreting of 7 km 189,000
Sinalac-Lulang FMR, Initao
Upgrading /Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Calacapan Calanyugan-
Kimalok FMR, Initao
Upgrading/Concreting of 3 km 84,000
Cogon Tawan-tawan –
Aluna FMR, Initao

111-swine -346
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services in the Province MFO Players
Upgrading/ Concreting of 2 km PCA, MLGUs, 54,000 PCA,
Oguis-Bandrera FMR, PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
Initao PRDP PLGU,
DA,
PRDP

111-swine -347
 Tuboran to Aluna FMR, 1.5 km 45,000
Naawan
Bangcalon to Tuboran FMR, 2.5 km 75,000
Naawan
Linangkayan Highway to Don 4 km 120,000
Pedro FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Poblacion to 7 km 210,000
Patag FMR, Naawan
Mat-I Linugos to Tagbalogo 6 km 180,000
FMR, Naawan
Don Pedro to Digcamara 3 km 90,000
FMR, Naawan
Lapad to Tuboran Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Purok 3 Mapulog to 3 km 90,000
Tagbalogo FMR, Naawan
Digcamara Mapulog to 2 km 60,000
Cabilin Road, Naawan
Mapulog P2 to Banatihon 5.5 km 160,000
Road, Naawan
Concreting of Mapulog – 4 km 92,400
Tuboran FMR with Arc bridges
component, Naawan
Concreting of Suwa-Bangko 4.58 km 137,400
Lubilan FMR, Naawan
Concreting of Mat-I Lubilan 8.27 km 165,400
FMR, Naawan
Lubilan to Mambuntan Road, 3 km 90,000
Naawan
Lubilan to Mahanggub Road, 2 km 60,000
Naawan
Tagbalogo P8 to Pasagdihon 4 km 120,000
FMR, Naawan
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Mat-I to Pasagdihon FMR, 3 km PCA, MLGUs, 90,000 PCA,
Naawan PLGU, DA, MLGUs,
PRDP PLGU, DA,
PRDP
Centro Don Pedro to 2.309 km 60,500
Macawa Road, Naawan
Don Pedro to Linangkayan 2 km 60,000

111-swine -348
 FMR, Naawan
Mapulog P6 to P8 FMR, 5 KM 150,000
Naawan
Maputi P8 to P12 FMR, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Maputi to Tuboran, 4 km 120,000
Naawan
Concreting of FMR Along 3 km 90,000
Purok 5-A & Purok 5-B of
Brgy. Pagawan, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 4 km 120,0
Sitio Donque, Upper 00
Malibog, Manticao
Concreting of FMR at 5 km 150,0
Barangay Balintad, 00
Manticao
Concreting Pagawan – 2.00 54,000
Sambuyaan Road, km
Manticao
Concreting Cabalantian – 3.6 km 97,200
Kolambugan Road,
Manticao
Concreting Argayoso – 2.5 km 67,000
Mat-I , Manticao
Concreting 0.70 18,900
PanianganBrgy. Road, km
Manticao
Concreting TuodPurok 0.50 13,500
7 , Manticao km
Concreting of Balintad – 1.5 km 40,000
Victory Road, Manticao
Value Chain Key Gap/Constraint Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Management Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & in VC Development in Potential Intervention Sub Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services the Province MFO Players
Concreting of Magpait 2.50 PCA, 67,500 PCA,
– Camanga Road, km MLGUs, MLGUs,
PLGU, DA,
Manticao PLGU, DA, PRDP
PRDP
Concreting of Tuod- 3.00 81,000
Pagangon Road, km
111-swine -349
 Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Mahayahay – Kilablab, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Mahayahay – km
Limonda, Manticao
Concreting of Donque 3.00 81,000
Hill, Manticao km
Concreting of Bagares 0.50 13,500
St., Manticao km
Concreting of Sabuero 0.30 8,100
St., Manticao km
Concreting of 0.30 8,100
Cementery Road, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.50 94,500
Mahayag-Digkilaan, km
Manticao
Concreting of 3.00 81,000
Sagyawan – Malibato, km
Manticao

Value Chain Key Gap/ Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & Constraint in VC Potential Intervention Sub Management Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services Development in MFO Players
the Province
Inter-firm Relationship/ Governance
Strict Local Provision of livelihood Province Province Province Province PLGU/ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 PLGU/
requirements Government programs thru loans at Wide Wide Wide Wide MLGU/ CLGU MLGU/
imposed by Units to provide least 50 farmers provided CLGU
financing credit/ loan loan / year

111-swine -350
institutions program for the
farmers
Minimal Strengthen DA's Establishment of Province Province Province Province Drought, no build in DA-BA, DILG 100 100 100 100 DA-BA,
prioritization linkage C/MVET in local Wide Wide Wide Wide Flood, identified PLGU-PVO DILG
of livestock strategies with government units of the Tropical hazard areas Provincial/City PLGU-PVO
industry livestock sector province thru RA 9482 Storm, Veterinarian Provincial /
earthquake league of the City
developed in PVET Office
Philippines Veterinaria
most n league of
municipality the
Philippines
Ineffective Implement land Presence of approved 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs PLGU/ 100 100 100 100 PLGU/
implementatio use and zoning CLUPs in the LGUs of MLGU/ CLGU MLGU/
n of land use effectively based the province CLGU
ordinance on the LGUs
approved CLUP
Strengthening of the 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs PLGU/ 100 100 100 100 PLGU/
existing Bio-Security MLGU/ CLGU MLGU/
(Quarantine) CLGU
LGU policies on 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs PLGU/ 100 100 100 100 PLGU/
establishment of MLGU/ CLGU MLGU/
livestock farms CLGU
Enforcement of 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs PLGU/ 100 100 100 100 PLGU/
Environmental Laws on MLGU/ CLGU MLGU/
raising swine CLGU

Value Chain Key Gap/ Brief Description of MFO/ Target Results Major Risk Risk Proposed Estimated Project Cost (000) Source of Rank
Segments & Constraint in VC Potential Intervention Sub Management Lead & other Funds
2023 2024 2025 2026 2023 2024 2025 2026
Services Development in MFO Players
the Province
Insurance PCIC Insurance Intensive IEC and 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs 25 LGUs PLGU/M/ PLGU/M/
for both Backyard Registration of farmers in CLGU/PCIC CLGU/
& Commercial the RSBSA. PCIC
farm
PLGU included farmers All Swine All Swine All Swine All Swine PLGU/M/ 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 PLGU/M/
accident & life insurance Raisers Raisers Raisers Raisers CLGU/PCIC CLGU/
PCIC
111-swine -351
Loan Program Provision of easy 150 farmers provided All Swine All Swine All Swine All Swine PLGU/ PLGU/
access to loans Raisers Raisers Raisers Raisers MLGU/PO/DA MLGU/DA
agricultural
loan/credit
program
Policy Support Policy support Policy supported by SP & All Swine All Swine All Swine All Swine PLGU/ MLGU MLGU/
requiring all SB strict implementation Raisers Raisers Raisers Raisers PLGU
slaughtering of
animal be done at
the slaughter
house

111-swine -352
Chapter IV Institutional Arrangements for PRDP-Funding

4.1. Implementation Supervision

The Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP) of the Provincial Government of Misamis Oriental
shall be implemented through the Provincial Project Management Implementing Unit (PPMIU)
spearheaded by the Planning Development Office in close Coordination with Provincial Agriculture
Office. The PPMIU shall be managing the overall program implementation of the PRDP in the province.
Support units such as the Investment in AFMP Planning at the Local and National Levels (I-PLAN),
Intensified Building-Up of Infrastructure and Logistics for Development (I-BUILD) and the Investments in
Rural Enterprises and Agriculture and Fisheries Productivity (I-REAP) units shall assist in the
implementation particularly on sub-components which responsibilities are vested on these units.

At the City and Municipal levels, implementation supervision on sub-projects co-funded by the
participating LGUs and the DA through the PRDP shall be the responsibility of the LGU itself. For I-
BUILD sub-projects for instance, the LGU through its City/Municipal Engineers Office shall see that
procurement(s) made relative to sub-project implementation are in accordance with all legal provisions
and the implementation of projects are all within the specifications of the approved program of works
(POW) or plan specifications of the sub-project(s). The implementation of the I-REAP sub-projects will be
supervised by the business enterprise/Peoples Organization (PO) itself. However, implementation of the
I-REAP sub-projects shall be closely coordinated with the I-REAP Unit of the PPMIU.

4.2 Organization and Management

Executive Order No. 069 series of 2022 issued by the provincial governor of Misamis Oriental on
December 28, 2022 shall be the main basis for the organization and management in the implementation
of the PRDP in the province. The PPMIU shall be the organization responsible for the overall
coordination efforts and see that the implementation and management of the PRDP in the province is in
accordance to the project’s goals and objectives. Responsibility on activities on the sub-components of
the project will correspondingly fall on the units under the PPMIU. These are the I-PLAN, I-BUILD, I-
REAP and the Monitoring and Evaluation Units.

Presented in Figure 14.1 is the overall organizational structure as per EO No. 069 Series of. 2022 the
implementation and management of the PRDP in the province.

IV-353
Figure 4.1: Organizational Structure for the Implementation of the PRDP in the province of
Misamis Oriental

PPMIU Head

Coordinating GRM C/MPMIU

NGAs Committee Project Head

AN UNIT
I-PLAN I-BUILD UNIT I-SUPPORT – I-SUPPORT – SES
ECONOMIC

The PPMIU Head is the overall supervisor of the project. Direct and insure the smooth operation of the
project from the formulation of the Provincial Commodity Investment Plan (PCIP), conceptualization of
FS for I-Build project, Business Plan for I-REAP in coordination with the Support Team such as the
Economics and Social Environmental Safeguard (SES) unit. The PPMIU Head is supported by the
Project Head.

I-Plan Team, shall lead the formulation of the Provincial Commodity Investment Plan (PCIP) and prepare
other related documents.

The effective implementation of the PRDP Provincial Commodity Investment Plan (PCIP) of the Province
of Misamis Oriental entails the following stakeholders to undertake their respective tasks:

 National Program Coordination Office (NPCO), headed by the DA Undersecretary for Operations,
shall handle overall coordination and support, particularly in information and external
communications. It shall coordinate Program management information and monitoring and
evaluation and shall serve as the interim Program Support Office (PSO) for Luzon B Cluster.

 Regional Program Advisory Board, headed by the DA 10 Regional Executive Director, shall provide
guidance to the Regional Program Coordination Office (RPCO) and ensure that policy directions are
carried out in project planning and implementation. It shall review and approve for funding I-Build

IV-354
 and I-Reap subprojects endorsed by RPCO and shall review, approve and endorse PRDP annual
regional work and financial plan to the National Program Coordination Office.

 Program Support Office (PSO) shall oversee the regional cluster operations and support services,
disburse funds and prepare reports related to fund management and support the NPCO in ensuring
achievement of Program milestones.

 Regional Program Coordination Office (RPCO), established in DA 10 with guidance and support
from PSO and NPCO, is the key implementing unit of Philippine Rural Development Program
(PRDP). It shall ensure full play of RFU, including mobilization of DA-related agencies. It shall
review, evaluate and validate subproject proposals submitted by Local Government Units (LGUs) for
endorsement to RPAB. RPCO shall monitor the physical and financial progress of PRDP
components following reporting arrangements prescribed in the Program Monitoring and Evaluation
System.

 The PRDP Provincial Project Management Unit (PPMIU) of the Province of Misamis Oriental,
created through Provincial Executive Order shall oversee the implementation of the Program in the
Province. It shall determine the necessary interventions to ensure timely delivery of government
commitments to the Program. It shall coordinate program requirements with concerned national
government offices, LGUs and the private sector, if necessary PPMIU shall resolve issues and
concerns relative to the implementation of the Program and shall require regular submission to
appropriate authorities of accomplishment reports by the Program Action Teams.

I-Build Team shall oversee the implement of the PRDP infrastructure projects from the formulation of the
plan, project implementation, monitoring .and evaluation of all I-BUILD projects.

I-Reap Team shall carry out the investment plan in rural enterprises and agri- fisheries productivity.
Responsible in providing technical assistance to I-REAP Proponent in formulating their Business Plan,
project implementation, monitoring and evaluation.

I-Support Team shall ascertain sufficient allocation, timely disbursement and proper utilization of the
local counterpart funds for the Program. It shall also ensure that the Program components and
objectives are implemented and achieved and DRR-CCA dimensions are integrated in the PRDP plan of
the Province.

IV-355
  Monitoring & Evaluation

The PRDP standard monitoring and evaluation system shall be utilized by the Provincial Planning and
Development Office through the Monitoring and Evaluation Team of Provincial Agriculture Office. There
shall be periodic submission of web-based geo-tagged monitoring reports to concerned agencies.
Results and recommendations shall be used in the improvement or modification necessary to enhance
project management.

 Social and Environmental Safeguards (SES)

The social and environmental safeguards (SES) is one of the support activities that will be undertaken to
ensure that all subprojects to be implemented are not only technically, economically and financially viable,
but are also environmentally and socially sound and sustainable. The Provincial Environment Natural
Resource Office (PENRO) shall take charge of the aspect of the sound management of environmental
activities, while, the Provincial Cooperative Office in support with Office Barangay Affairs (OBA) shall be
tapped to assist in the social preparation of the proponents thru its community development affairs section.
The SES will operate according to the provisions of the existing Philippine Government policies, framework
and guidelines (including local policies) as well as other Donor governing policies concerning the sub-project
implementation. SES consideration will ensure that the people and the environment will not be adversely
affected by any sub-projects implementation.

Thus, all PRDP sub-projects under the I-BUILD and I-REAP components shall undergo environmental
screening conforming to the environmental guidelines. Project implementation will also determine if
construction activities cause to displace and affect persons such that appropriate resettlement,
compensation and rehabilitation plans in accordance to land acquisition, resettlement and rehabilitation
framework are to be formulated for sub-project affected persons. Moreover, affected rural communities,
particularly involving the indigenous peoples and communities will be involved at the start of the planning
and design stage of sub-project in accordance with the provisions in the IP policy framework.
All necessary compliance concerning the social and environmental assessment will be adopted and will be
discussed in detail in the social and environmental section of each sub-project Feasibility Study or Business
Plan.

The province of Misamis Oriental will adhere to the general policy espoused by the PRDP with regards to
the selection and implementation of sub-projects which is “to ensure that the people and the environment
are not adversely affected by the sub-projects implemented under the PRDP”. For this reason the province
together with all its participating LGUs to the PRDP will be observing the policy frameworks that govern the
application of social and environmental safeguards. The province, through the PPMIU and the cities and
municipalities through their respective C/MPMIUs will be guided by the following PRDP Social and
Environmental Safeguards Frameworks (SESF):

IV-356
 1. Environmental management framework and guidelines
2. Indigenous people’s policy framework
3. Land acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement framework

To adhere to the framework and guidelines on environment management, the provincial government of
Misamis Oriental and all participating city and municipal LGUs shall see to it that sub-projects under the I-
BUILD and/or I-REAP components of the PRDP follow the technical guidelines for environmentally sound
design projects. As a matter of provincial and city/municipal LGUs policy, all sub-projects to be proposed for
co-funding with the PRDP should not be located within or encroach into a declared or proposed protected
area of natural habitat. Sub-projects, especially under the I-BUILD component should not be such, that it
displace, damage or render inaccessible or inoperable, sites or structures of cultural or historical
significance. These are but some of the policies that will be observed in the selection and implementation of
sub-projects to be proposed for funding under the PRDP. Overall, the province and city/municipal LGUs
shall see to it that national and local laws/provisions/issuances as well as that of the donor country
concerning the selection and implementation of sub-projects will be observed and strictly followed.

The implementation of the PRDP in the province shall also comply with the Indigenous People Policy
Framework. The Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (RA 8371) and the World Bank’s policy on indigenous
peoples will serve as the overarching laws/principles that shall be adhered in the implementation of sub-
projects under the PRDP in the province. This is to ensure that the interests, needs and concerns of the
Indigenous Cultural Communities (ICC) and Indigenous Peoples (IPs) are taken in consideration in the
selection, design and implementation of specific sub-projects near or within their communities and/or
territories.

The selection and implementation of PRDP sub-projects in the province will also be guided by the land
acquisition, rehabilitation and resettlement framework. This is to ensure that all involuntary losses, (be it
lands, structures, crops or other properties of Project-Affected-Persons (PAPs) are properly and justly
compensated. Those who are displaced (whether physically or economically) are resettled and/or provided
with assistance to improve, or at least maintain their pre-project living standards and income earning
capacity.

In order to have smooth implementation Executive Orders was issued by Governor Yevgeny Vincente B.
Emano last 2021 as shown in Annex – 1. After the Administration of Governor Emano another EO was
executed by Governor Peter M. Unabia as reflected in Annex- 2.

IV-357
IV-358
 Annex - 1 Executive Order No. 2014-003 Series of 2014

IV-359
Annex – 2 Executive Order No. 069 issued by Governor Peter M. Unabia creating the PPMIU of Misamis Oriental

IV-360
Philippine Rural Development Project (PRDP) MOA of 2015

IV-361
IV-362