GE Math 4 Midterm
GE Math 4 Midterm
GE Math 4 Midterm
Example 1.1. “Drilling for oil caused dinosaurs to become extinct.” is a proposition.
Recall a proposition is a declarative sentence that is either true or false. Here are
some further examples of propositions:
Example 1.7. The Earth is further from the sun than Venus.
Example 1.9. 2 × 2 = 5.
_
LESSON II: SIMPLE AND COMPOUND PROPOSITION
Conjunction and ᴧ
Disjunction or v
Implication or If … then …
Conditional
Biconditional …if and only if…
Negation not ͂ or ⌐
Example:
P Q – The triangle has three sides if and only if it has three corners.
P – Today is Monday.
~P – _______________________________________________________
~Q – _______________________________________________________
P^Q – ______________________________________________________
P v Q – ______________________________________________________
P Q - _____________________________________________________
P Q - ____________________________________________________
TRUTH TABLE
We can express compound propositions using a truth table that displays the relationships
between the truth values of the simple propositions and the compound proposition. In the next three
tables we show the truth tables for the negation, conjunction, and disjunction. Observe that any
proposition p can take only two values, namely true, denoted T , or false, denoted F . Therefore, for a
compound proposition consisting of two propositions (e.g., p ^ q) we must consider only four possible
assignments of T and F .
It shows the truth or falsity of a compound statement. It depends on the truth or falsity of the simple statements
from which it is constructed.
1.
Conjunction
Let p and q be statements, written p ᴧ q, is the statement formed by joining p and q using the word
“and”. For example, if it is cold and it is raining is understood to be true when both conditions – being
cold and rainy- are satisfied. If it is cold but not raining, or rainy but not cold, or neither cold nor rainy, the
sentence is understood to be false. (Dapat duha ka true para ma true) Truth table for Conjunction
P Q PᴧQ
F F F
F T F
T F F
T T T
2.
Disjunction
P v Q, is the statement written formed by joining the statements P and Q using the word “or” Truth table
for Disjunction. (Dapat naay usa ka true para ma true)
P Q PvQ
F F F
F T T
T F T
T T T
3.
BIIMPLICATION/BICONDITIONAL
P Q , “ P if and only if Q
This statement is called biimplication or biconditional of P and Q. (If pareha kay true, if dili
pareha kay false)
P Q P Q
F F T
F T F
T F F
T T T
4.
IMPLICATION
P Q, “ if p, then q”. This statement is called implication or condition. Where p is the hypothesis ,
and Q is called the conclusion. (If pareha kay true, if di pareha, tan awa ang ikaduha nga proposition)
P Q
P Q Q P
F F T T
F T T F
T F F T
T
T T T
Example 1: Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive to the conditional statement
“If I work diligently, then I will gain understanding.”
The inverse p→ q is “If I do not work diligently then I will not gain understanding.”
The contrapositive q→ p is “If I do not gain understanding, then I will not work
diligently."
Example 2: Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive to the conditional statement
“If I teach third grade, then I am an elementary teacher”.
The converse q→p is “If I am an elementary teacher, then I teach third grade.”
The inverse p→ q is “If I don't teach third grade, then I am not an elementary
teacher.”
The contrapositive q→ p is “If I am not an elementary teacher, then I don't teach
third grade."
Example 3: Write the converse, inverse, and contrapositive to the conditional statement
“If it is raining, then I wear a raincoat”
NOTE: Be aware that symbolic logic cannot represent the English language perfectly.
For example, we may need to change the verb tense to show that one thing occurred
before another.
These two individual statements are connected using the logical operator “OR” which is
generally denoted by the symbol “ ”.
Case 1: I will give 10 pesos. In this case, the first statement is true and the second
statement is false. As the given statement is connected using the OR operator, it results
in the true statement.
Case 2: I will not give 10 pesos. In this case, the first statement is false and the second
statement is true. Thus, it produces a true statement.
Now, let us discuss this statement with the help of the truth table.
P (I will give you 10 pesos) ~P ( I will not give you 10 P ~P (I will give you 10
pesos) pesos or I will not give you
10 pesos)
T F T
F T T
Thus, the final column of the truth table is true for all the values, hence the given
statement is a tautology.
TAUTOLOGY LOGIC SYMBOLS
Tautology uses different logical symbols to present compound statements. Here are the
symbols and their meaning used in Maths logic:
For the conclusion of an argument to necessarily follow from the premises, it means that
the symbolic statement
Solution:
While this example is fairly obviously a valid argument, we can analyze it using a truth
table by representing each of the premises symbolically. We can then form a conditional
statement showing that the premises together imply the conclusion. If the truth table is a
tautology (always true), then the argument is valid.
We’ll let b represent “You bought bread” and s represents “you went to the store”. Then
the arguments becomes
Premise 1: b→ s Premise
2: b
Conclusion: s
To test the validity, we look at whether the combination of both premises implies the
conclusion. Is it true that { b→ s)^b}→s
b s b →s { b→s) ^ b} { b→s) ^ b}→s
T T T T T
T F F F T
F T T F T
F F T F T
The last column of the truth table shows that [(b→s)∧b]→s is always true. This is a
tautology, and so the argument is valid. Based on these premises, it is correct to
conclude "You went to the store."
Example 2: p: I go to
get an internship
Premise 1: ∼p →q
Premise 2: p
Conclusion: ∼q
One truth value for [(∼p→q)∧p]→∼q in the last column of the table is False, while the
remaining truth values are True. This is not a tautology, and so the argument is invalid.
Based on these premises, it is not correct to conclude "I won't get an internship."
Example 3: s=I
studied f= I failed
the class
Conclusion: I studied.
Premise 1: s v f
Premise 2: ∼f
Conclusion: s
All truth values for [(s∨f)∧∼f]→s in the last column of the table are True. This is a
tautology, and so the argument is valid. Based on these premises, it is correct to
conclude "I studied."
SEATWORK 2.1.
_____4. 1+1=6
_____5. Go out!
_____7. Flag
_____8. 3 is a multiple of 6
_____9. 5 + 2
_____10. I am happy.
_____13. Move!
_____14. Ouch!
II. Write the following statement in symbolic form and vice versa.
p= I am happy q= I am rich
s=I studied r=I passed the exam
Statement symbolic
I am happy and I am not rich. 1.
2. svr
3. p→q
If I love Joshua, then I don’t love Dlar. 4.
2. If the electricity goes out then the standard telephone will still work 3. The
4. If Cathy Smith walks 4 miles today then she will be sore tomorrow.
5. It is false that if John Wubben fixes your car then you will need to pay him in cash.
r: We go swimming
1. (p v q)^ ~r
___________________________________________________________________________
2. ~p→ (q v r)
___________________________________________________________________________
3. (q↔︎p)^r
___________________________________________________________________________
4. (p→r)^p
___________________________________________________________________________
5. (p^q)vr
___________________________________________________________________________
______________1. The apartment is hot if and only if the temperature is not 90 oF, or the
air conditioner is not working.
______________2. If the apartment is hot and the air conditioner is working, then the
temperature is 90o F.
______________3. It is false that if the apartment is hot then the air conditioner is not
working.
______________4. The apartment is hot or the air conditioner is not working, if and only
if the temperature is 90o F.
______________5. If the temperature is 90oF then the reconditioner is not working, and
the apartment is hot.
SEATWORK 2.4.
P Q ~P ~Q ~P ^ ~Q P v (~P^~Q) P^Q P ~Q ~P Q
T T
T F
F T
F F
dig a hole
Symbolic Form
Premise 1: _________
Premise 2: _________
Conclusion: _________
2. m= I go to the mall
Symbolic Form
Premise 1: _________
Premise 2: _________
Conclusion: _________
m j mvj (mvj)^p [(mvj)^p] → j