Next Steps To Saeu
Next Steps To Saeu
Next Steps To Saeu
TO
SOUTH ASIAN ECONOMIC UNION
A Study on Regional Economic Integration (Phase II)
Commissioned by the SAARC Secretariat
Executive Summary
NEXT STEPS
TO
SOUTH ASIAN ECONOMIC UNION
A STUDY ON REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION (PHASE II)
COMMISSIONED BY THE SAARC SECRETARIAT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Report prepared for the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Secretariat
The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the
SAARC Secretariat and the Asian Development Bank, or their Board of Directors, or the governments they represent.
Contents
Acknowledgmentsiv
1 Background1
2 Genesis of SAEU2
3 Goals, General Objectives, and Terms of Reference3
3.1 Goals 3
3.2 General Objectives and Terms of Reference 3
4 Overview of Intra-Regional Trade in South Asia5
5 Overview of Chapters8
6 Recommendations10
6.1 Elements of SAEU 10
6.2 Trade Potential of SAEU 11
6.3 Full Implementation of SAFTA 12
6.4 Reducing Non-Tariff Barriers 13
6.5 Integrating SAFTA and Bilateral Trade Agreements 13
6.6 Integrating Formal and Informal Trade 14
6.7 Facilitating Trade in Services 14
6.8 Labor Mobility 15
6.9 Investment Cooperation 16
6.10 Economic Corridors 16
6.11 Trade Facilitation 17
6.12 Poverty Eradication 18
6.13 Regional and Global Value Chains 18
6.14 Integration of Capital Markets 19
6.15 Energy Cooperation 19
7 Conclusion21
Appendix: Action Plan Recommended in the Study22
iii
Acknowledgments
The Study on Regional Economic Integration (Phase-II) has been commissioned by the
SAARC Secretariat with the technical and financial assistance of Asian Development Bank.
The lead editor of the report is Dr. Selim Raihan, ADB consultant. The SAARC Secretariat
would also like to recognize the invaluable contributions of Mr. Cuong Minh Nguyen, Dr.
Farazi Binti Ferdous, Mr. Md. Abdur Rahim, Dr. Ather Maqsood Ahmed, Ms. Robina Ather
Ahmed, Dr. Nisha Taneja, Ms. Radhika Saini, Dr. Rupa Chanda, Dr. Arpita Mukherjee, Dr.
Khondaker Golam Moazzem, Ms. Mehruna Islam Chowdhury, Ms. Farzana Sehrin, Dr. Prabir
De, Ms. Suwendrani Jayaratne, Dr. Ganga Tilakaratna, Dr. Saman Kelegama, Dr. Mostafa Abid
Khan, Mr. Shaquib Quoreshi, Dr. Rashmi Banga, Ms. Jennifer Romero-Torres, Mr. Stephen
Wells, Ms. Susan Selwyn-Khan and Mr. P. N. Fernando in writing different chapters of the
study. Special mention is reserved for Dr. David Husband, ADB consultant, for the economic
editing of the report.
I also wish to acknowledge Ms. Savithri Lakshmanan, Director and Mr. Subash C. Sharma,
Programme Officer, Economic, Trade and Finance Division, SAARC Secretariat, for their
valuable advice and guidance and for arranging various technical workshops related to
this report.
I wish to thank Asian Development Bank for its continued support to the SAARC Secretariat,
and in the preparation of this report.
iv
Background 1
The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) is striving to more closely
integrate the economies of its eight member countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan,
India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka). Globalization has helped spur progress and
the Agreement on South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA), signed in 2006, marks an important
milestone in regional cooperation and integration (RCI). However, despite these and other
developments, South Asia is one of the least integrated regions in the world. Intra-regional
trade continues to account for less than 5% of formal trade of the eight member countries.
SAFTA results to date have fallen short of expectations due to complex safeguard measures
and non-tariff barriers (NTBs) among SAARC member countries. Global, regional and
domestic turbulences have also complicated progress in liberalizing trade, investment and
other dimensions of regional economic cooperation. Nonetheless, there has been progress
and relationships among SAARC countries have improved. Increasingly, their mutual interest
lies in accelerating and deepening their economic cooperation and integration. The Heads of
State or Government reaffirmed their commitment to regional cooperation through SAARC
and underscored the importance of annual Summit meetings in charting common strategies
for the realization of the objectives and principles set out in the Charter of the Association.
Meeting for the first time at the dawn of the new millennium, they solemnly renewed
their pledge to strengthen the Association and make it more cohesive, result oriented,
and forward looking, by adopting clearly defined programs and effective implementation
strategies in line with popular expectations. To give effect to the shared aspirations for a more
prosperous South Asia, the Leaders agreed to the vision of a phased and planned process
eventually leading to a South Asian Economic Union (SAEU). Although non-tariff barriers,
infrastructure constraints and other factors continue to hamper regional cooperation and
integration in South Asia, reference by SAARC Leaders to SAEU indicates a willingness to
consider bold action.
On the request of SAARC Secretariat, ADB supported to carry out Phase I of the SAARC
Study on Regional Economic Integration (REI). Phase I of the study on REI proposed
approaches of achieving REI through four pillars, namely market integration, cross-border
connectivity, energy cooperation and private sector liberalization. The current second phase
of the study on REI intends to provide a roadmap for achieving the SAEU.
1
2 Genesis of SAEU
It is therefore needed to reinforce all four RCI approaches, with private and public sector
business interests guiding coordinated initiatives. There is also a need to be clear by what is
meant by SAEU. While the original call a decade ago included the possibility of a common
currency and monetary unification, the Euro debt crisis has cautioned against going beyond
what may be sustainable and of mutual benefit—especially in light of marked differences in the
size and economic status of SAARC member countries. ASEAN provides the evolving model
most closely aligned with the aspirations of South Asia. The ASEAN Economic Community
(AEC) is scheduled to come into effect in 2015, characterized by open, outward-looking,
inclusive and market-driven economies of its ten member countries. Sector roadmaps and
rules-based systems are designed to ensure mutual benefits and effective compliance and
implementation of agreed commitments. The AEC is essentially a Free Trade Area (FTA)
Plus model, in which the barriers to movements of goods, capital, labor and services will be
reduced as much as possible. ASEAN is designed neither as a customs union with common
external tariffs, nor as an economic union with a common currency. ASEAN’s FTA Plus model
can help guide SAARC’s conceptualization of SAEU, taking into account regional needs.
2
Goals, General Objectives,
and Terms of Reference 3
3.1 Goals
The goals of the Second Phase of the study are to provide a detailed road map for SAEU
along with identification of specific priority steps to be taken under each stage of regional
economic integration and quantification of potential gains from various phases of regional
economic integration on priority sectors.
• review and update the completed draft report of SAARC Study on REI along with
country reports of Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka;
• prepare a road map for the identification of 2–3 priority sectors for trade
liberalization under South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA), including the
quantitative assessment of reducing tariff to 0–5 % and their implications to each
individual SAARC country, especially on Least Developed Countries (LDCs);
• prepare a road map for reducing and removing Para-tariff Measures (PTMs) and
Non-tariff Measures (NTMs) by carrying out the following tasks: (a) Examine
the Notifications on NTMs/PTMs submitted by Member States; (b) Examine
Responses and counter-responses on notifications/responses submitted by
Member States; (c) Categorize each NTM/PTM mentioned in each Notification/
Response/Counter-response in broad categories; (d) Examine whether each
NTM/PTM mentioned in the Notifications is compatible with WTO provisions of
not; (e) Suggest ways and means of reducing those identified NTMs/PTMs which
are not compatible with WTO provisions; and (f) make suggestions on how to
address the trade barriers;
• chart out a course of action on how to ultimately move towards SAEU including
the action plan and/or suggestion for harmonization of customs schedules of
countries in the region and identification of specific priority steps to be taken
under each stage of regional economic integration;
• quantify potential gains from various phases of regional economic integration,
including SAEU on priority sectors;
• assess implications of regional economic integration on SAARC countries,
especially on LDCs and provide mechanisms to support LDCs;
3
4 Next Steps to South Asian Economic Union
Table 1 records regional exports as a percentage of a country’s total exports. The shares varied
widely, from 82% in the case of Bhutan to only 2% for Bangladesh and 4% for India. Like
Bhutan, intra-regional exports accounted for 67% and 71%, respectively, of Afghanistan’s and
Nepal’s total exports. Similar to exports, there were wide variations in the relative importance
of intra‑regional imports for SAARC countries. Approximately 50% of Afghanistan imports
and 44% of Nepal’s imports were from SAARC countries. In sharp contrast, only 1% of India’s
Imports Exports
Sri Lanka
Pakistan
24% Bangladesh 13%
23%
Nepal
India
20% India
Bhutan 73%
13%
4%
Pakistan
10%
Maldives
1%
5
6
Regional
export as %
of country’s
Afghanistan
Bangladesh
Bhutan
India
Maldives
Nepal
Pakistan
Sri Lanka
Total Intra
regional Export
Total export
imports were from other SAARC member countries; low intra-regional dependency was also
evident for Pakistan, where imports from other SAARC member countries accounted for
only 5% of total imports.
Total exports of a SAARC member country as a percentage of total exports of all eight
SAARC member countries is another measure of their relative trade openness and size.
India accounts for 65% of the region’s combined total exports. Pakistan accounts for 21%
while Afghanistan and the Maldives together account for only about 1%. In terms of imports,
Sri Lanka accounts for 24% of total intra-regional imports, followed closely by Bangladesh at
22%. Bhutan and Maldives account for only 1% of total imports by SAARC member countries.
5 Overview of Chapters
Chapter I is the introductory chapter of this report. It presents the major issues for
consideration for the movement toward the SAEU. This chapter provides an overview of
the literature on regional integration in South Asia. This chapter presents an analysis on the
definition of the approach for SAEU.
Chapter II provides an analysis of the trade performance and potential in South Asia,
including indicators related to overall economic conditions, the sectoral composition and
direction of trade, and tariff and non-tariff protection. The pattern of intra-regional trade is
analyzed and comparisons made with other regions.
Chapter III provides an overview of the main features of SAFTA, including sensitive lists,
rules of origin, treatment of non-tariff barriers, and the compensation and dispute resolution
mechanisms. SAFTA is compared to ASEAN’s FTA, so as to identify the policy measures and
timelines needed for greater progress toward SAEU.
Chapter IV analyzes bilateral trade agreements in South Asia and investigates how these
agreements could be harmonized with SAFTA.
Chapter V analyzes the importance of informal trade in South Asia. The methodologies
for estimating informal trade flows in South Asia are outlined, together with an analysis
of their composition and the reasons for informal rather than formal trade practices. The
differentiating characteristics between formal and informal traders are identified.
Chapter VI examines the status of trade in services in South Asia, with a view to understanding
the prospects for and challenges to deeper integration of the service sector. Brief overviews
are provided on service sector trends in the SAARC member countries and in the region as
a whole. The key features and modalities of negotiations under the SAARC Agreement on
Trade in Services (SATIS) are outlined, together with the opportunities and challenges of
trade liberalization for a representative set of services (energy, telecommunications, tourism
and health).
Chapter VII examines recent developments in labor mobility and remittances in South Asia
and provides a comparative analysis with other regions, leading to policy recommendations
for greater integration and harmonization consistent with progress toward the SAEU. Focus
is given to facilitating the movement of professionals and skilled workers, as barriers to their
movement are easier to remove, or at least reduce, under trade agreements.
8
Overview of the Chapters 9
Chapter VIII discusses the broad similarities and differences of FDI regulatory regimes of
SAARC member countries and provides a review on SAARC’s perspective on investment
cooperation. Recommendations are made regarding formulation of a road map for investment
cooperation under the SAEU.
Chapter IX discusses the key policy and infrastructure priorities for development of
economic corridors in South Asia, and their importance in networking with regional and
global value chains (RVCs and GVCs).
Chapter X addresses trade facilitation measures consistent with creation of SAEU and
reviews the performance of SAARC member countries in promoting trade facilitation.
Chapter XI analyzes how regional integration in trade in goods and services and in investment
and other areas could help reduce poverty in South Asia. This chapter includes a theoretical
and empirical analysis of the interrelationship between regional integration and poverty
reduction.
Chapter XII outlines the methodology for identifying priority products for fast track trade
liberalization in South Asia, focusing on non-tariff measures (NTMs). Export capacity is
compared to actual export performance, and the NTMs identified 50 products where
bilateral exports are zero despite large export potential.
Chapter XIII quantitatively assesses the implications of full implementation of SAFTA (with
and without the sensitive lists) and the impact of deeper degrees of regional integration in
South Asia. The analysis is based on use of a global general equilibrium model.
Chapter XIV discusses strategic interventions required at national and local levels in support
of RVCs in South Asia and their link to GVCs. Estimates are made of the untapped potential
for regional trade in South Asia, based on a gravity model, and sectors are identified suitable
for development of RVCs.
Chapter XV examines issues related to integration of capital markets in South Asia. It provides
cross-regional analysis of the size of capital markets in South Asia and the regulations
governing them.
Chapter XVI analyzes energy demand and supply in South Asia and the prospects for
cross‑border energy trade.
Chapter XVII reviews the development of regional institutions in South Asia and outlines
broad recommendations on how to improve the overall institutional architecture for SAEU.
Finally Chapter XVIII presents an overall summary of the report and its main conclusions.
6 Recommendations1
Cross-cutting issues should include building and strengthening institutions, capacity building
and financing.
SAEU’s main features are summarized in Table 3, highlighting its FTA, common market, and
growth area elements, supported by efficient regional institutions and funding mechanisms.
1
An Action Plan recommended in the Study is provided in the Appendix.
10
Recommendations 11
Economic analysis provided in the companion document indicates that full implementation
of SAFTA would generate significant increases in intra-regional trade and income gains for
all SAARC member countries. In volume terms, the largest trade gain would accrue to India;
in terms of boosts to GDP, the largest gain would accrue to Nepal. All SAARC countries
12 Next Steps to South Asian Economic Union
would experience measurable increases in their total exports, with the largest increase by
Nepal (32%) followed by Bangladesh (5%), Pakistan (5%), Sri Lanka (3%) and India (1.3%). It
is estimated that intra-regional trade could triple over current levels, providing more than a
$30 billion boost to the region annually.
A High Level Task Force should review the legal, technical, institutional and administrative
features of SAFTA, identifying changes needed to accelerate full implementation of SAFTA.
The review will include not only the Sensitive Lists and Non-Tariff Barriers but also the Rules
of Origin, Compensation Mechanism and Dispute Resolution. The Rules of Origin should
be liberalized, so as to take account of the changing business environment and bilateral
agreements in the region. Combined value addition requirements and the issuance of origin
certificates should be facilitated through better use of technology. The scope and jurisdiction
of the Dispute Resolution Mechanism should be strengthened, thereby providing greater
confidence that SAFTA is being implemented as intended.
Recommendations 13
Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) for specific products or sectors will greatly
expedite intra-regional trade. Adequate funds should support the human and financial
resources needed to make the South Asian Regional Standards Organisation effective. The
process of accreditation and certification should be advanced by more ready acceptance
of certificates issued by competent laboratories in SAARC countries. National treatment is
to be accorded to all products in respect to registration, labeling and testing, together with
charges and fees thereof. SAARC countries should expedite automation of their customs
clearance procedures under the Automated System for Customs Data (ASYCUDA) system.
SAFTA’s rules of origin provisions, notably the 30% value-addition provision, should be
adjusted so as to better facilitate intra-regional export trade expansion in South Asia.
Value‑additions of most LDC export products are very low, hence the current 30%
value‑added provision acts as a barrier to export trade. SAFTA rules of origin should also
better align with the Pakistan/Sri Lanka and other bilateral FTAs regarding tariff headings and
shifts in headings following processing (e.g., final product classification at the first four digit
level vis-à-vis non-originating materials). Trade diversion in South Asia will be minimized by
reducing the absolute level of external tariffs of SAARC member countries and narrowing
inter-country differences in their external tariff rates.
Harmonizing SAFTA preferences with those of bilateral FTAs should be addressed through
easing the rules of origin:
Lack of proper transport and transit facilities, cumbersome customs procedures, excessive
paperwork and poor infrastructure at border areas prompt traders to rely on informal rather
than formal channels. While SAARC member countries have made important progress in
facilitating cross-border trade and in reducing the associated transaction costs (including
time), further improvements are urgent. Customs procedures and paperwork need to be
simplified and connectively improved through improved cross-border infrastructure and
transport protocols. Easier visa processes, cellular services and courier facilities are further
measures for spurring formal trade.
The trade information base should be upgraded, including through increased communication
among export and import traders in SAARC member countries. Greater dialogue among
traders will contribute to a more active and amenable business environment, along with
filling gaps in information concerning trade regulations and procedures. SAARC on-line
networks, trade fairs and exhibitions will be further means for promoting intra-regional trade.
Streamlined border security is another step toward SAEU. Security checks, payment of
bribes, and harassment by border officials discourage formal trade. Border officials must be
better able to differentiate between legitimate trade and informal or illegal trade. Information
concerning legitimately traded goods, routes, correct standards and bonafide trading partners
should be improved.
The payment process for formal trade transactions need to be streamlined. Establishment
of cross-border banking facilities will facilitate traders throughout the region. Easier access
to credit and banking systems will encourage informal traders to gradually switch to formal
trade, although ethnic trading networks are expected to continue.
dispute settlement and contract enforcement; double taxation treaties will also
be developed;
• greater institutional and regulatory cooperation, notably through harmonization
of financial services regulations and standards, thereby facilitating remittances and
investment flows though formal banking and capital market channels; additional
steps will include the reduction of exchange restrictions, adoption of common
standards and strengthening regulatory enforcement of the financial sector;
• improvements in the business environment, including through improved
transport connectivity and transit trade agreements; standards and regulatory
principles for the service sector will be established; and
• an incremental, phased approach to liberalization of trade in services, focusing
first on the least contentious services, such as tourism and information technology
services; negotiations concerning service trade liberalization will proceed on issues,
sectors and sub-sectors where there is a minimum core group of three or more
interested members, following ASEAN’s open approach; bilateral and multilateral
agreements (e.g. BIMSTEC) will also serve for advancing trade in services; SAARC
member countries will consider a request and offer approach to liberalizing the
movement of natural persons for selected categories of service providers; SATIS
discussions will be linked with those on trade facilitation.
Implementation of SATIS should involve four critical steps: first, improving information on the
service sector so as to better understand its importance and the barriers to trade in services;
second, focus regional discussions on regulatory and institutional issues critical to trade in
services; third, development of the regional transport and trade facilitation infrastructure;
and fourth, capacity building, including selected services such healthcare, environment,
education, renewable energy, and tourism.
• draw from the ASEAN model for investment cooperation, while adjusting in
recognition of conditions in South Asia;
• simplify and harmonize procedures for investment applications and approvals;
• widely disseminate investment-related rules and regulations;
• harmonize guidelines for investment in specific sectors;
• strengthen institutional capacity for regulating investment, including foreign direct
investment;
• facilitate investment transactions through improved financial and banking
networks;
• coordinate investment and trade liberalization; and
• simplify cross-border customs regulations.
Policy initiatives for the development and sharing of the hydropower potential in Bhutan,
Nepal and other areas of the region should include:
20 Next Steps to South Asian Economic Union
• analysis of the power structures in the member countries, their legal and regulatory
frameworks, their security and stability standards, and their compatibility;
• analysis of the power generation scheduling and dispatch procedures, energy
accounting systems, financial settlement systems and of the institutional,
regulatory and commercial requirements for cross-border power trade; and
• development of a framework for regional power exchanges linking the power
systems of SAARC member countries.
(i) Why is there a need for deeper regional economic integration in South Asia?
SAARC Summits should pave the way. SAARC’s full institutional structure must
be mobilized in making SAEU a reality. In turn, SAARC’s vast population needs to
be mobilized in support of this vital challenge.
21
APPENDIX
Action Plan Recommended in the Study
22
Action Plan Recommended in the Study 23
Mutual recognition of
qualifications for some
selected professions
among the member
countries.
continued on next page
24 Appendix