Uterine Inversion
Uterine Inversion
Uterine Inversion
Uterine Inversion
Monika Thakur; Angesh Thakur.
Objectives:
Introduction
Etiology
Excessive umbilical cord traction with a fundal attachment of the placenta and
fundal pressure in the setting of a relaxed uterus are the 2 most common
proposed aetiologies for uterine inversion.
Other possible risk factors for uterine inversion include rapid labor, invasive
placentation, manual removal of placenta, short umbilical cord, use of uterine-
relaxing agents, uterine overdistension, fetal macrosomia, nulliparity, placenta
previa, connective tissue disorders (Marfan syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos
syndrome), and history of uterine inversion in the previous pregnancy. However,
in most cases, no risk factors are identified, thus making this condition
unpredictable.[2][3][4]
Degrees of Uterine Inversion
Incomplete: Fundus inverts but does not herniate through the level of the
internal os
Complete: The internal lining of the fundus crosses through the cervical os
with no palpable fundus abdominally
Prolapsed: Entire uterus prolapsing through the cervix with the fundus
passing out of the introitus
Classification
Epidemiology
Pathophysiology
1. A portion of the uterine wall prolapses through the dilated cervix or indents
forward
Uterine inversion is a clinical diagnosis and should be suspected when the fundus
is not palpable abdominally. The sudden onset of brisk vaginal bleeding leads to
hemodynamic instability in the mother. Traditionally, the shock has been
considered disproportionate to blood loss, which is possibly mediated by
parasympathetic stimulation caused by the stretching of tissues. However, careful
evaluation of the need for blood transfusion should be made because blood loss is
massive and is greatly underestimated. The other symptoms are mainly severe
lower abdominal pain with a strong bearing down sensation, though
most women may not be able to complain due to severe shock. It may occur
before or after placental detachment.[1][6]
Evaluation
The diagnosis is often made clinically with a bimanual examination, during
which the uterine fundus is palpated in the lower uterine segment or within the
vagina. If a clinical examination is equivocal, then an ultrasound can be used to
confirm the diagnosis.[7][1][8]
Treatment / Management
The recent uterine inversion with the placenta already separated from it
may often be replaced by manually pushing up on the fundus with the palm
and fingers in the direction of the long axis of the vagina. A delay will
render replacement more difficult and also increase the risk of hemorrhage.
After the placenta is removed, steady pressure with the fist is applied to the
inverted fundus in an attempt to push it up into the dilated cervix.
Alternatively, two fingers can be extended rigidly to push the center of the
fundus upward. Undue force is not applied to avoid perforation of the
uterus with the fingertips. This is followed by the administration of
uterotonic agents, which help uterine contraction, thereby preventing
recurrence of the inversion.
If the placenta is not separated from the uterus, then a hysterectomy may be
necessary.
Differential Diagnosis
The conditions that cause a lump in the vagina and lead to postpartum collapse
need to be excluded. These include:
Uterovaginal prolapse
Fibroid polyp
Neurogenic collapse
Postpartum collapse
Coagulopathy
Prognosis
Acute cases can lead to hemorrhagic shock, but prompt management usually
mitigates long-term sequelae. It is unknown whether the condition affects future
pregnancy prospects, but case reports exist of uncomplicated pregnancies.
Complications
Review Questions
References
1. Wendel MP, Shnaekel KL, Magann EF. Uterine Inversion: A Review of a Life-
Threatening Obstetrical Emergency. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018 Jul;73(7):411-
417. [PubMed: 30062382]
2. Free L, Ruhotina M, Napoe GS, Beffa L, Wohlrab K. Uterine Inversion
Presenting as Pelvic Organ Prolapse in a Patient with Leiomyosarcoma. J
Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Nov-Dec;26(7):1217-1218. [PubMed: 30926367]
3. Vieira GTB, Santos GHND, Silva Júnior JBN, Sevinhago R, Vieira MIB, Souza
ACS. Non-puerperal uterine inversion associated with myomatosis. Rev Assoc
Med Bras (1992). 2019 Feb;65(2):130-135. [PubMed: 30892434]
4. Girish B, Davis AA. Chronic uterine inversion with malignancy mimicking
carcinoma cervix. BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Feb 01;12(2) [PMC free article:
PMC6366801] [PubMed: 30709891]
5. Eddaoudi C, Grohs MA, Filali A. [Uterine inversion: about a case]. Pan Afr Med
J. 2018;29:99. [PMC free article: PMC5987136] [PubMed: 29875980]
6. Mishra S. Chronic Uterine Inversion Following Mid-Trimester Abortion. J
Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018 Aug;68(4):320-322. [PMC free article: PMC6046678]
[PubMed: 30065549]
7. Zohav E, Anteby EY, Grin L. U-turn of uterine arteries: a novel sign
pathognomonic of uterine inversion. J Ultrasound. 2020 Mar;23(1):77-79. [PMC
free article: PMC7010891] [PubMed: 30284197]
8. Della Corte L, Giampaolino P, Fabozzi A, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Bifulco G. An
exceptional uterine inversion in a virgo patient affected by submucosal
leiomyoma: Case report and review of the literature. J Obstet Gynaecol Res.
2019 Feb;45(2):466-472. [PubMed: 30187623]
9. Coad SL, Dahlgren LS, Hutcheon JA. Risks and consequences of puerperal
uterine inversion in the United States, 2004 through 2013. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):377.e1-377.e6. [PubMed: 28522320]
10. Oladapo OT, Akinola OI, Fawole AO, Adeyemi AS, Adegbola O, Loto OM,
Fabamwo AO, Alao MO, Sotunsa JO., Nigerian AMTSL Group. Active
management of third stage of labor: evidence versus practice. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(11):1252-60. [PubMed: 19824866]
Disclosure: Monika Thakur declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible
companies.