Source Study 2
Source Study 2
Source Study 2
Jonathan Couser
4/17/24
Religious persecution has occurred for many different reasons over the years, almost
always involving someone speaking out or going against the grain, then being vilified and often
prosecuted and/or killed. After publishing a book on his findings in 1610, the astronomer Galileo
Galilei was subsequently scrutinized by the Roman Catholic Church and Pope Urban VIII for
supporting the Copernican heliocentric system. Copernicus said that the planets, including Earth,
orbit around the Sun, which in his model was the center of the universe. At the time it was
considered heresy to suggest any idea but the Ptolemaic system was accurate, as that was what
had been believed for so long. Galileo fought for his rights and ideology for many years, trying
to prove he was no heretic and that his ideas about the celestial plane were separate from
anything spoken about in the Bible. Despite the trouble the Roman Catholic Church put him
through, Galileo was not secretly an atheist and did not harbor disdain for Christianity as a
whole.
Certainly many who lived at the time of Galileo’s findings being released would say that
the man hated Christianity, indeed, he was on trial with the potential for terrible punishment if he
were to be found guilty of continuing to believe in the Copernican theory of the universe. Galileo
faced torture or death if he did not renounce his statements and more importantly, prove that his
written works were not heresy. Most people would do anything it takes to avoid such a fate, and
hence it is perfectly reasonable to suggest that he entirely lied about his care for Christianity and
added extra disclaimers that otherwise would have been left out. During this time of
investigation, Galileo tried to rally support from people who had influence and had shown
interest in his research previously. One such individual he sent an essay to was the Grand
Duchess Christina of Tuscany, hoping she would understand him and give her good word about
him to Pope Urban. This letter shows what Galileo is willing to say to someone who isn’t
necessarily going to burn him at a moment's notice, giving more insight into where his
sentiments may have laid, making this letter highly useful for analysis.
Despite all of this, Galileo still does his very best to pad most of what he says throughout
his letter to the Duchess and is understandably highly defensive of what he was intending to
mean. It is clear he doesn’t want to allow his opinions to be up for much interpretation. In one
such instance he states the goal behind sharing his findings about the stars, then pads it in the
sentence after:
“My goal is this alone; that if, among errors that may abound in these considerations of a
subject remote from my profession, there is anything that may be serviceable to the holy Church
in making a decision concerning the Copernican system, it may be taken and utilized as seems
best to the superiors. And if not, let my book be torn and burnt, as I neither intend nor pretend to
We see here a great case where he specifically says he does not want to gain anything that
is against his beliefs, due to the potentially risky nature of the line before. To this day an
argument is made that if Galileo lived in a different place or time, he would have been an atheist
or at least less involved with Christianity. Of course, it is impossible for us to know for sure what
Galileo thought, but we can look at his writings, particularly those around the time of his
prosecution, to try and find some clues. In that excerpt, he effectively says ‘Curse me if I am
wrong!’ which, in a society as religiously tied as his, is a rather serious statement. Yes, he could
have lied, but this is a letter to his previous supporter, the Grand Duchess Christina, so needing
to have such a bold lie isn’t really going to make or break his case to her.
A highly important takeaway to consider here is the ways that Galileo speaks about God,
the Bible, and the Church in this letter, and to notice the differences between them. The passage
speaks about the Bible and how it has been simplified, which makes it omit certain direct
descriptions:
“Now the Bible, merely to condescend to popular capacity, has not hesitated to obscure
some very important pronouncements, attributing to God himself some qualities extremely
To argue against Galileo’s faith, it would be easy to look at this quote and say that he is
suggesting God does not possess all of the attributes the Bible gives him and that this is Galileo
suppressing his feeling that God might not have any power, or even exist at all. But that is a far
reach; Galileo here says not that God isn’t in control of these things, but simply that the Bible
does not dive deep enough to get into the intricacies of His relationship with celestial bodies. His
real trouble comes from interpretations of the Bible, when people tried to fill in the blanks
regarding many things such as the sky. Galileo correctly was trying to say that higher-ups of the
church had been saying for many years that the Earth was the center of the universe because the
Bible said so. Indeed, passages from the Bible make vague reference to the Earth not moving and
the sun being something that can be ‘commanded’ but all of these various notes from scripture
can easily be written off as metaphors or simplifications- exactly what Galileo was trying to
Defending himself later in the letter, Galileo talks about how the Bible is being
misinterpreted presumably by people like Pope Urban, and how if God didn’t tell them
specifically how the sky functioned, conclusions about the celestial bodies are in no way against
His word.
“Now if the Holy Spirit has purposely neglected to teach us propositions of this sort as
irrelevant to the highest goal (that is, to our salvation), how can anyone affirm that it is
obligatory to take sides on them, that one belief is required by faith, while the other side is
erroneous?”
This is a perfect argument against those who accused him; there is so little in the Bible
about the skies, and it does not matter for the sake of achieving the ultimate goal of gaining
access to Heaven. Galileo says the stars, moon, sun, and planets are separate from Heaven, and
therefore up to interpretation. It makes very little sense why the Catholic church would care so
passionately about this issue, but it was absolutely due to the pope and others in the church not
wanting to admit the traditional ideas they promoted were wrong, so they inevitably point fingers
at the Bible as the definitive astrological book, which it most certainly is not. Also, when looking
at this passage and the context before and after it, it is hard to find any wording or statements
where Galileo has an undertone of disdain for God or the religion in general, but simply his
frustration with the incredibly stubborn people who ruled over him. This is a common theme
throughout this letter- you can tell he doesn’t want to say anything too bad about anyone, but
because he knows the Grand Duchess is likely to understand where he is coming from, he tells
“Hence I should think it would be the part of prudence not to permit anyone to usurp
scriptural texts and force them in some way to maintain any physical conclusion to be true, when
at some future time the senses and demonstrative or necessary reasons may show the contrary.”
These moments of Galileo’s impatience with the unwavering Pope and other authorities
are what make it even possible to hold the case that Galileo might not be in support of the
religion as a whole. But it is very important to specifically take note of who Galileo refers to. He
never says the Bible is wrong or flawed, just that it doesn’t cover everything in existence. He
never says God, Jesus, or any other Biblical figure is anything less than what the church believes,
even in this letter that was not to be seen by prosecutors, but rather a supporter.
An important piece to remember when analyzing Galileo’s writing here is that he was
advocating for a correct concept, or at least more correct than the preexisting concept. The
Copernican system may have been wrong about the location of the center of the universe, but it
was accurate in the idea of the earth and planets circling the sun. The point here is that Galileo
didn’t need to lie at all here, he knew that Copernicus was more accurate than the Ptolemaic
system and that he was being accused of something that is rather inconsequential, really. So
based on this we know that Galileo was not incorrect or lying in other areas besides his feelings
on organized religion. Indeed the man was likely very dissatisfied with the existing leaders of the
church, but we still fail to see evidence of any anti-Christian sentiments here.
In all of his struggles, Galileo did not lose faith in what he believed, only in those who
imposed their ideas upon it. During April of 1633, he was sentenced to house arrest for the
remainder of his life by Pope Urban, narrowly avoiding more violent fates. The Pope formally
convicted him of believing “that the sun is the center of the world, and that it does not move
from east to west, and that the earth does move, and is not the center of the world.”
Neither side was actually correct in this 23-year affair, as we know with modern
understandings. Galileo finally passed away in Florence in 1642, his findings never having been
accepted in time to free him. He remained a practicing Catholic, with both of his daughters
having become nuns, and did not make any more bold claims about the world. If he lived in a
later time, Galileo may have been able to continue making discoveries, possibly even realizing
that the sun was not the center of the universe either. Regardless of this, his faith did not waver
and he was not an atheist in secret, but just a man who was right at the wrong time.
Citations