Importance of Bearing Capacity in Soil Mechanics Shbaz
Importance of Bearing Capacity in Soil Mechanics Shbaz
Importance of Bearing Capacity in Soil Mechanics Shbaz
Bearing capacity:
It is the load carrying capacity of the soil.
This type of failure is seen in dense and stiff soil. The following are some
characteristics of general shear failure.
1. Continuous, well defined and distinct failure surface develops between the
edge of footing and ground surface.
2. Dense or stiff soil that undergoes low compressibility experiences this failure.
3. Continuous bulging of shear mass adjacent to footing is visible.
4. Failure is accompanied by tilting of footing.
5. Failure is sudden and catastrophic with pronounced peak in curve.
6. The length of disturbance beyond the edge of footing is large.
7. State of plastic equilibrium is reached initially at the footing edge and spreads
gradually downwards and outwards.
8. General shear failure is accompanied by low strain (<5%) in a soil with
considerable ( >36o) and large N (N > 30) having high relative density (I D>
70%).
Local Shear Failure
This type of failure is seen in relatively loose and soft soil. The following are some
characteristics of general shear failure.
This type of failure is seen in loose and soft soil and at deeper elevations. The following
are some characteristics of general shear failure.
Examples:
Classic examples of such failures are as follows (Figure 3): (a) major
damage to thousands of buildings in Niigata, Japan during the 1964 earthquake, (b)
Failure of Lower San Fernando dam which suffered an underwater slide during the San
Fernando earthquake, 1971. Fortunately, the dam barely avoided collapse, thereby
preventing a potential disaster of flooding of the heavily populated areas below the dam,
(c) Liquefied soil also exerts higher pressure on retaining walls, which can cause them
to tilt or slide. This movement can cause settlement of the retained soil and destruction
of structures on the ground surface, and (d) Collapse of the super- structure of the
Showa Bridge by falling off its piers; 1964 Niigata Earthquake. Figure 3. (a) Building
Failure during 1964 Niigata, Japan Earthquake, (ii) Failure of lower San Fernando dam
in 1971 (c) Retaining wall failure (d) Failure of Showa bridge during 1964 Niigata
earthquake in Japan. As such there is no remedial measure reported in literature to
overcome failures of such magnitudes but definitely preventive measures can be taken
through, (i) proper planning of Subsurface Investigation, (ii) Analysis and Design and (iii)
Construction Control and Supervision. For small scale damages underpinning of
structures are suggested.